Recent Changes for "ASUCD External Vice President" - Davis Wiki

ASUCD External Vice President

BrentLaabs — 2009-02-28 23:00:57

gnoming

Differences for ASUCD External Vice President

Deletions are marked with - .	Additions are marked with +.
Line 11:	Line 11:
- * Represenatation -- As the current structure stands, the Unit Directors of ["Lobby Corps"], ["State and National Affairs"], and ["City/County Affairs"] are hired by a committee consisting of the President, Vice President, the outgoing Unit Director, Business Manager, and two Senators, and are then confirmed by the Senate as a whole. Since Senators are elected by ["Choice Voting"], the entire student body is represented in this informed microcosm, and hired person must represent more than just his or her personal goals.	+ * Representation -- As the current structure stands, the Unit Directors of ["Lobby Corps"], ["ASUCD University Affairs"], and ["ASUCD City/County Affairs Office"] are hired by a committee consisting of the President, Vice President, the outgoing Unit Director, Business Manager, and two Senators, and are then confirmed by the Senate as a whole. Since Senators are elected by ["Choice Voting"], the entire student body is represented in this informed microcosm, and hired person must represent more than just his or her personal goals.

ASUCD External Vice President

JoePomidor — 2009-02-28 18:59:04

missed one

Differences for ASUCD External Vice President

Deletions are marked with - .	Additions are marked with +.
Line 14:	Line 14:
- * Power structure -- The EVP would create a new heirarchial structure, while the current ASUCD power structure is more distributed. More and different goals can be accomplished under the current system. ["Brian McInnis" One person] can't impede everyone's progress.	+ * Power structure -- The EVP would create a new hierarchical structure, while the current ASUCD power structure is more distributed. More and different goals can be accomplished under the current system. ["Brian McInnis" One person] can't impede everyone's progress.

ASUCD External Vice President

JoePomidor — 2009-02-28 18:58:50

Differences for ASUCD External Vice President

Deletions are marked with - .	Additions are marked with +.
Line 5:	Line 5:
- * Direct represenation -- The electorate may not know what kind of external affairs policy the ASUCD may be setting at election time. - * Accountablity -- Elections are frequently run on internal issues, such as ["Tipsy Taxi" Tapsy Ticksy], and not on external issues.	+ * Direct Representation -- The electorate may not know what kind of external affairs policy the ASUCD may be setting at election time. + * Accountability -- Elections are frequently run on internal issues, such as ["Tipsy Taxi" Tapsy Ticksy], and not on external issues.
Line 13:	Line 13:
- * Accountablity -- An elected person is accountable only to a recall election, but an appointed official is accountable to the entire Senate and President, and can be removed or their funding cut.	+ * Accountability -- An elected person is accountable only to a recall election, but an appointed official is accountable to the entire Senate and President, and can be removed or their funding cut.

ASUCD External Vice President

JasonAller — 2008-09-28 12:24:03

link fixes

Differences for ASUCD External Vice President

Deletions are marked with - .	Additions are marked with +.
Line 18:	Line 18:
	+ + ''2006-06-22 16:42:11'' [[nbsp]] With more disadvantages than advantages, why do most of the other ASUCs have one? --["Users/JosephBleckman"]
Line 19:	Line 21:
- ''2006-06-22 16:42:11'' [[nbsp]] With more disadvantages than advantages, why do most of the other ASUCs have one? --["JosephBleckman"] - ------ - ''2006-06-22 17:45:42'' [[nbsp]] I'd venture to guess it depends on how you weight it. Maybe they consider the advantages are of greater benefit than the disadvantages. --["EdWins" ES]	+ ''2006-06-22 17:45:42'' [[nbsp]] I'd venture to guess it depends on how you weight it. Maybe they consider the advantages are of greater benefit than the disadvantages. --["Users/EdWins" ES]

ASUCD External Vice President

EdWins — 2007-06-28 10:24:40

Differences for ASUCD External Vice President

Deletions are marked with - .	Additions are marked with +.
Line 21:	Line 21:
- ''2006-06-22 17:45:42'' [[nbsp]] I'd venture to guess it depends on how you weight it. Maybe they consider the advantages are of greater benefit than the disadvantages. --["EdwinSaada"]	+ ''2006-06-22 17:45:42'' [[nbsp]] I'd venture to guess it depends on how you weight it. Maybe they consider the advantages are of greater benefit than the disadvantages. --["EdWins" ES]

ASUCD External Vice President

EdwinSaada — 2006-06-22 16:45:42

Comment added.

Differences for ASUCD External Vice President

Deletions are marked with - .	Additions are marked with +.
Line 20:	Line 20:
	+ ------ + ''2006-06-22 17:45:42'' [[nbsp]] I'd venture to guess it depends on how you weight it. Maybe they consider the advantages are of greater benefit than the disadvantages. --["EdwinSaada"]

ASUCD External Vice President

JosephBleckman — 2006-06-22 15:42:11

Comment added.

Differences for ASUCD External Vice President

Deletions are marked with - .	Additions are marked with +.
Line 18:	Line 18:
	+ ------ + ''2006-06-22 16:42:11'' [[nbsp]] With more disadvantages than advantages, why do most of the other ASUCs have one? --["JosephBleckman"]

ASUCD External Vice President

BrentLaabs — 2006-06-13 18:08:01

Differences for ASUCD External Vice President

Deletions are marked with - .	Additions are marked with +.
Line 1:	Line 1:
	+ Unlike the majority of other ASUCs and GSAs, ["ASUCD"] '''does not have and has never had an External Vice President''', an elected person responsible for dealing with external affairs. The debate on creating this position has existed for many years, and continues to be debated within ASUCD; however, the general consensus is that an External Vice President (EVP) is not necessary. This debate came to head in 2004, when Senator ["Donald Cohen-Cutler"] proposed a constitutional amendment creating an EVP, which did not pass the Senate. In the meantime, debate has died away with the departure of ["Brian McInnis"]. + + = Advantages = + + Direct represenation -- The electorate may not know what kind of external affairs policy the ASUCD may be setting at election time. + * Accountablity -- Elections are frequently run on internal issues, such as ["Tipsy Taxi" Tapsy Ticksy], and not on external issues. + * Power structure -- one person is accountable for all of external affairs, consolidating power. + + = Disadvantages = + + * Represenatation -- As the current structure stands, the Unit Directors of ["Lobby Corps"], ["State and National Affairs"], and ["City/County Affairs"] are hired by a committee consisting of the President, Vice President, the outgoing Unit Director, Business Manager, and two Senators, and are then confirmed by the Senate as a whole. Since Senators are elected by ["Choice Voting"], the entire student body is represented in this informed microcosm, and hired person must represent more than just his or her personal goals. + * Diversity of opinion -- Hired external affairs people are responsible to the entire student government -- elected people are responsible only to themselves. + * Accountablity -- An elected person is accountable only to a recall election, but an appointed official is accountable to the entire Senate and President, and can be removed or their funding cut. + * Power structure -- The EVP would create a new heirarchial structure, while the current ASUCD power structure is more distributed. More and different goals can be accomplished under the current system. ["Brian McInnis" One person] can't impede everyone's progress. + * Communication -- An EVP may not be informed on what is going on in the rest of the government, and will be less likely to understand the problems in ASUCD. Therefore, an EVP may not represent students and the student government as well at organizations such as ["UCSA"], and instead work on personal goals. + + [[Comments]]