Recent Changes for "Apartments/Talk" - Davis Wikihttp://daviswiki.org/Apartments/TalkRecent Changes of the page "Apartments/Talk" on Davis Wiki.en-us Apartments/Talkhttp://daviswiki.org/Apartments/Talk2013-03-05 17:13:59PeteBRevert to version 24 (moving ashley's request to roommate page). <div id="content" class="wikipage content"> Differences for Apartments/Talk<p><strong></strong></p><table> <tr> <td> <span> Deletions are marked with - . </span> </td> <td> <span> Additions are marked with +. </span> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> Line 47: </td> <td> Line 47: </td> </tr> <tr> <td> <span>- ------<br> - ''2013-03-05 16:03:12'' [[nbsp]] Location: Adobe at Evergreen (by sutter memorial hospital)<br> - Time Period: Beginning June 2013 sublease and then can continue lease<br> - Price: $765 for upstairs apartment with balcony, large kitchen, large living room, large bedroom big enough for two, personal bathroom, personal mini fridge, rent includes xfinity high speed wireless internet, PG&amp;E, and 24 hour access to on site gym and pool<br> - Gender Preference: girl<br> - Roomates: 2 girls<br> - <br> - looking for someone to sublease at adobe at evergreen apartments starting June 2013. You would have your own room, bathroom, mini fridge, and great amenities such as a pool and hot tub, 24 hour gym, and beautiful lounge. The rent also includes internet and pg&amp;e. The room is big enough for two if you and a friend want to bunk together. The room is also cable ready. The rent, internet, PG&amp;E and utilities cost is 765 a month. Message me if interested<br> - --["Users/AshleyFord"]</span> </td> <td> </td> </tr> </table> </div> Apartments/Talkhttp://daviswiki.org/Apartments/Talk2013-03-05 17:03:12AshleyFordComment added. <div id="content" class="wikipage content"> Differences for Apartments/Talk<p><strong></strong></p><table> <tr> <td> <span> Deletions are marked with - . </span> </td> <td> <span> Additions are marked with +. </span> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> Line 47: </td> <td> Line 47: </td> </tr> <tr> <td> </td> <td> <span>+ ------<br> + ''2013-03-05 16:03:12'' [[nbsp]] Location: Adobe at Evergreen (by sutter memorial hospital)<br> + Time Period: Beginning June 2013 sublease and then can continue lease<br> + Price: $765 for upstairs apartment with balcony, large kitchen, large living room, large bedroom big enough for two, personal bathroom, personal mini fridge, rent includes xfinity high speed wireless internet, PG&amp;E, and 24 hour access to on site gym and pool<br> + Gender Preference: girl<br> + Roomates: 2 girls<br> + <br> + looking for someone to sublease at adobe at evergreen apartments starting June 2013. You would have your own room, bathroom, mini fridge, and great amenities such as a pool and hot tub, 24 hour gym, and beautiful lounge. The rent also includes internet and pg&amp;e. The room is big enough for two if you and a friend want to bunk together. The room is also cable ready. The rent, internet, PG&amp;E and utilities cost is 765 a month. Message me if interested<br> + --["Users/AshleyFord"]</span> </td> </tr> </table> </div> Apartments/Talkhttp://daviswiki.org/Apartments/Talk2012-08-02 16:41:50ScottMeehleibComment added. <div id="content" class="wikipage content"> Differences for Apartments/Talk<p><strong></strong></p><table> <tr> <td> <span> Deletions are marked with - . </span> </td> <td> <span> Additions are marked with +. </span> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> Line 45: </td> <td> Line 45: </td> </tr> <tr> <td> </td> <td> <span>+ ------<br> + ''2012-08-02 16:41:50'' [[nbsp]] Doesn't really bother me that much yet to be honest. One of the photo captions came across as a bit promotional and obnoxious, but for the most part I'm okay with it, unless I'm missing something. --["Users/ScottMeehleib"]</span> </td> </tr> </table> </div> Apartments/Talkhttp://daviswiki.org/Apartments/Talk2012-08-02 16:17:37TomGarbersonComment added. <div id="content" class="wikipage content"> Differences for Apartments/Talk<p><strong></strong></p><table> <tr> <td> <span> Deletions are marked with - . </span> </td> <td> <span> Additions are marked with +. </span> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> Line 43: </td> <td> Line 43: </td> </tr> <tr> <td> </td> <td> <span>+ ------<br> + ''2012-08-02 16:17:37'' [[nbsp]] Ugh. Anyone else have any input on this page? I'm really not a fan of increased commercialization of it. --["Users/TomGarberson"]</span> </td> </tr> </table> </div> Apartments/Talkhttp://daviswiki.org/Apartments/Talk2012-07-23 10:25:10TomGarbersonComment added. <div id="content" class="wikipage content"> Differences for Apartments/Talk<p><strong></strong></p><table> <tr> <td> <span> Deletions are marked with - . </span> </td> <td> <span> Additions are marked with +. </span> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> Line 41: </td> <td> Line 41: </td> </tr> <tr> <td> </td> <td> <span>+ ------<br> + ''2012-07-23 10:25:10'' [[nbsp]] Is it just me or is this category page getting a bit on the promotional side? I like having an example photo for each section, but I don't like that they're coming from self-interested parties and I don't like that they feel so promotional. Ideas on how to clean it up? --["Users/TomGarberson"]</span> </td> </tr> </table> </div> Apartments/Talkhttp://daviswiki.org/Apartments/Talk2011-10-15 01:26:50JabberWokky <div id="content" class="wikipage content"> Differences for Apartments/Talk<p><strong></strong></p><table> <tr> <td> <span> Deletions are marked with - . </span> </td> <td> <span> Additions are marked with +. </span> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> Line 40: </td> <td> Line 40: </td> </tr> <tr> <td> </td> <td> <span>+ * I use the term "traditions", because it connotes to me the most honest portrayal of the situation. I think any photo that is misleading should be edited in the same way text that is misleading should be handled: either clarified or removed. Pretty simple. It is, of course, nicer to have photos provided by a wider spectrum of the community, but I do think that having photos is better than none, and in many cases that's the situation. Of course, I've captioned some photos in ways that make it clear they are more artistic than representation -- what's the one where they photo edited them and cranked the saturation to 11? That happens with photos taken by anybody else, too. -jw</span> </td> </tr> </table> </div> Apartments/Talkhttp://daviswiki.org/Apartments/Talk2011-10-14 19:58:03CovertProfessor <div id="content" class="wikipage content"> Differences for Apartments/Talk<p><strong></strong></p><table> <tr> <td> <span> Deletions are marked with - . </span> </td> <td> <span> Additions are marked with +. </span> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> Line 39: </td> <td> Line 39: </td> </tr> <tr> <td> </td> <td> <span>+ * Fewer pictures that were clearly labeled as management photos would certainly help. The common-area pictures are in fact helpful to prospective tenants, I think. As for the others, I added labels based on the filenames and reorganized a bit so I could see what was what. I think we could delete pics that are just alternate perspectives of a room that don't add anything. There are also two pictures that were not given meaningful filenames and so I could not label them meaningfully; those might be deleted as well. --cp</span> </td> </tr> </table> </div> Apartments/Talkhttp://daviswiki.org/Apartments/Talk2011-10-14 17:44:03KemblePopeComment added. <div id="content" class="wikipage content"> Differences for Apartments/Talk<p><strong></strong></p><table> <tr> <td> <span> Deletions are marked with - . </span> </td> <td> <span> Additions are marked with +. </span> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> Line 35: </td> <td> Line 35: </td> </tr> <tr> <td> </td> <td> <span>+ ------<br> + ''2011-10-14 17:44:03'' [[nbsp]] Some pages simply say "Photos by Management" and leave it at that. Perhaps a couple of the Anderson Place photos could be removed as duplicates. As to "interesting angles", I assumed that a fish lens was used because they were taking a photo in a very small space that doesn't allow much perspective.<br> + <br> + I think a line should be drawn somewhere, but let's not lose sight of the fact that this property manager (and most business owners) are trying really hard to be active, positive users that follow DavisWiki culture, guidelines, protocol (whatever you want to call this amorphous collection of consensus decisions) and we need to ensure that we encourage their participation. --["Users/KemblePope"]</span> </td> </tr> </table> </div> Apartments/Talkhttp://daviswiki.org/Apartments/Talk2011-10-14 15:58:08CovertProfessorComment added. <div id="content" class="wikipage content"> Differences for Apartments/Talk<p><strong></strong></p><table> <tr> <td> <span> Deletions are marked with - . </span> </td> <td> <span> Additions are marked with +. </span> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> Line 33: </td> <td> Line 33: </td> </tr> <tr> <td> </td> <td> <span>+ ------<br> + ''2011-10-14 15:58:08'' [[nbsp]] I just want to mention that "too many photos" or "too many staged photos" has definitely come up before, the former with Elizabeth's pet sitting, the latter with other apartments. As ES suggests, the staged photos can be misleading and geared towards showing things in the best light, thus promotional. --["Users/CovertProfessor"]</span> </td> </tr> </table> </div> Apartments/Talkhttp://daviswiki.org/Apartments/Talk2011-10-14 14:59:26EdWins <div id="content" class="wikipage content"> Differences for Apartments/Talk<p><strong></strong></p><table> <tr> <td> <span> Deletions are marked with - . </span> </td> <td> <span> Additions are marked with +. </span> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> Line 32: </td> <td> Line 32: </td> </tr> <tr> <td> <span>-</span> ''2011-10-14 14:56:43'' [[nbsp]] With a layout like that, and so many photos, I end up feeling it's not much different than a vertical scrolling [http://daviswiki.org/Greystone?action=Files&amp;do=view&amp;target=better.jpg brochure]. At the least, the photos are promoted by the management/owners and should be marked as they're clearly trying to show the place in the best possible light. They're not neccessarily representative, and in many cases (both now and in the past) they seem to be deliberately misleading using [http://daviswiki.org/Anderson_Place_Apartments?action=Files&amp;do=view&amp;target=2x1MBRPartial.jpg interesting angles] at best, editing photos at worst. (In this case, they're the same photos from their [http://www.tandemproperties.com/listings/anderson-place/ own website], so are we even allowed to have those up with CC?) I popped this page up to get input from other people on whether we can try to draw a line somewhere, or somehow standardize formatting/mark up throughout <span>the apartment pages</span>. --["Users/EdWins"] </td> <td> <span>+</span> ''2011-10-14 14:56:43'' [[nbsp]] With a layout like that, and so many photos, I end up feeling it's not much different than a vertical scrolling [http://daviswiki.org/Greystone?action=Files&amp;do=view&amp;target=better.jpg brochure]. At the least, the photos are promoted by the management/owners and should be marked as they're clearly trying to show the place in the best possible light. They're not neccessarily representative, and in many cases (both now and in the past) they seem to be deliberately misleading using [http://daviswiki.org/Anderson_Place_Apartments?action=Files&amp;do=view&amp;target=2x1MBRPartial.jpg interesting angles] at best, editing photos at worst. (In this case, they're the same photos from their [http://www.tandemproperties.com/listings/anderson-place/ own website], so are we even allowed to have those up with CC?) I popped this page up to get input from other people on whether we can try to draw a line somewhere, or somehow standardize formatting/mark up throughout <span>ALL the apartment pages, even if my example is focused on one</span>.<span>&nbsp;&nbsp;</span> --["Users/EdWins"] </td> </tr> </table> </div> Apartments/Talkhttp://daviswiki.org/Apartments/Talk2011-10-14 14:58:34EdWinsalso <div id="content" class="wikipage content"> Differences for Apartments/Talk<p><strong></strong></p><table> <tr> <td> <span> Deletions are marked with - . </span> </td> <td> <span> Additions are marked with +. </span> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> Line 32: </td> <td> Line 32: </td> </tr> <tr> <td> <span>-</span> ''2011-10-14 14:56:43'' [[nbsp]] With a layout like that, and so many photos, I end up feeling it's not much different than a vertical scrolling [http://daviswiki.org/Greystone?action=Files&amp;do=view&amp;target=better.jpg brochure]. At the least, the photos are promoted by the management/owners and should be marked as they're clearly trying to show the place in the best possible light. They're not neccessarily representative, and in many cases (both now and in the past) they seem to be deliberately misleading using [http://daviswiki.org/Anderson_Place_Apartments?action=Files&amp;do=view&amp;target=2x1MBRPartial.jpg interesting angles] at best, editing photos at worst. I popped this page up to get input from other people on whether we can try to draw a line somewhere, or somehow standardize formatting/mark up throughout the apartment pages. --["Users/EdWins"] </td> <td> <span>+</span> ''2011-10-14 14:56:43'' [[nbsp]] With a layout like that, and so many photos, I end up feeling it's not much different than a vertical scrolling [http://daviswiki.org/Greystone?action=Files&amp;do=view&amp;target=better.jpg brochure]. At the least, the photos are promoted by the management/owners and should be marked as they're clearly trying to show the place in the best possible light. They're not neccessarily representative, and in many cases (both now and in the past) they seem to be deliberately misleading using [http://daviswiki.org/Anderson_Place_Apartments?action=Files&amp;do=view&amp;target=2x1MBRPartial.jpg interesting angles] at best, editing photos at worst. <span>&nbsp;(In this case, they're the same photos from their [http://www.tandemproperties.com/listings/anderson-place/ own website], so are we even allowed to have those up with CC?) </span>I popped this page up to get input from other people on whether we can try to draw a line somewhere, or somehow standardize formatting/mark up throughout the apartment pages. --["Users/EdWins"] </td> </tr> </table> </div> Apartments/Talkhttp://daviswiki.org/Apartments/Talk2011-10-14 14:56:43EdWinsComment added. <div id="content" class="wikipage content"> Differences for Apartments/Talk<p><strong></strong></p><table> <tr> <td> <span> Deletions are marked with - . </span> </td> <td> <span> Additions are marked with +. </span> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> Line 31: </td> <td> Line 31: </td> </tr> <tr> <td> </td> <td> <span>+ ------<br> + ''2011-10-14 14:56:43'' [[nbsp]] With a layout like that, and so many photos, I end up feeling it's not much different than a vertical scrolling [http://daviswiki.org/Greystone?action=Files&amp;do=view&amp;target=better.jpg brochure]. At the least, the photos are promoted by the management/owners and should be marked as they're clearly trying to show the place in the best possible light. They're not neccessarily representative, and in many cases (both now and in the past) they seem to be deliberately misleading using [http://daviswiki.org/Anderson_Place_Apartments?action=Files&amp;do=view&amp;target=2x1MBRPartial.jpg interesting angles] at best, editing photos at worst. I popped this page up to get input from other people on whether we can try to draw a line somewhere, or somehow standardize formatting/mark up throughout the apartment pages. --["Users/EdWins"]</span> </td> </tr> </table> </div> Apartments/Talkhttp://daviswiki.org/Apartments/Talk2011-10-14 14:50:19KemblePopeComment added. <div id="content" class="wikipage content"> Differences for Apartments/Talk<p><strong></strong></p><table> <tr> <td> <span> Deletions are marked with - . </span> </td> <td> <span> Additions are marked with +. </span> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> Line 21: </td> <td> Line 21: </td> </tr> <tr> <td> </td> <td> <span>+ ------<br> + ''2011-10-14 14:50:19'' [[nbsp]] There is no discussion on the "For Profit Restrictions" page about the number of allowable photos. Basically, the rule now is "go with your gut". I don't think that there are too many photos on the Anderson Place Apartments...<br> + <br> + I don't think that "user contributed" images are inherently better than those submitted by owners/manager. In my mind, a good photo is better than a poor photo... no matter who submits it.<br> + <br> + I think that professional, staged photos are better than photos of empty spaces. And I think that any photo is better than no photo.<br> + <br> + I would also prefer some consensus on how many photos are too many, and what exactly constitutes "representative".<br> + <br> + Any thoughts on the "impact on the servers" angle? --["Users/KemblePope"]</span> </td> </tr> </table> </div> Apartments/Talkhttp://daviswiki.org/Apartments/Talk2011-10-14 13:19:40EdWins <div id="content" class="wikipage content"> Differences for Apartments/Talk<p><strong></strong></p><table> <tr> <td> <span> Deletions are marked with - . </span> </td> <td> <span> Additions are marked with +. </span> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> Line 18: </td> <td> Line 18: </td> </tr> <tr> <td> <span>-</span> Thought I'd open it up to discussion, might be a good project to organize and update the pages from this Apartments listing. Thoughts? -["users/Edwins" ES] </td> <td> <span>+</span> Thought I'd open it up to discussion, might be a good project to organize and update the pages from this Apartments listing.<span>&nbsp;&nbsp;Are promotional staged photos crossing the lines into advert territory? Are having *some* of those photos (maybe not all 30) good or bad for the wiki, especially for pages lacking photos?</span> Thoughts? -["users/Edwins" ES] </td> </tr> </table> </div> Apartments/Talkhttp://daviswiki.org/Apartments/Talk2011-10-14 13:16:04EdWins <div id="content" class="wikipage content"> Differences for Apartments/Talk<p><strong></strong></p><table> <tr> <td> <span> Deletions are marked with - . </span> </td> <td> <span> Additions are marked with +. </span> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> Line 16: </td> <td> Line 16: </td> </tr> <tr> <td> <span>-</span> I was going to respond to Kemble with "Representative pictures is always the goal, preferably user contributed, not cherrypicked by owners/managers." </td> <td> <span>+</span> I was going to respond to Kemble with "Representative pictures is always the goal, preferably user contributed, not cherrypicked by owners/managers."<span>&nbsp;&nbsp;Additionally, the standards do differ - the wiki has ["Wiki Community/For Profit Restrictions"] that mean there is a heckuva difference between business pages and personal pages.</span> </td> </tr> </table> </div> Apartments/Talkhttp://daviswiki.org/Apartments/Talk2011-10-14 13:11:30EdWins <div id="content" class="wikipage content"> Differences for Apartments/Talk<p><strong></strong></p><table> <tr> <td> <span> Deletions are marked with - . </span> </td> <td> <span> Additions are marked with +. </span> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> Line 1: </td> <td> Line 1: </td> </tr> <tr> <td> <span>- deleted</span> </td> <td> <span>+ This page is for discussing the contents of ["Apartments"].<br> + <br> + I had put an 'Advert' include on an apartment page. My stated reason was "The 100 staged photos :P" to KP when asked why. If he doesn't mind the cross-post, he responded:<br> + <br> + 2011-10-14 12:49:45 aha! interesting point... I can't recall ever seeing any discussion about "how much is too much?" when it comes to photographs. I do think that the same standard should be applied across the board for all users e.g. there shouldn't be different standards for business owners.<br> + <br> + Two thoughts:<br> + 1) As a renter, I like the idea of seeing as many photographs as possible... interiors, exteriors, amenities, location etc.<br> + 2) Hosting images is data intensive, should the "health" of the servers be considered and a limit set? -["Users/KemblePope"]<br> + <br> + <br> + So...<br> + <br> + Some apartment pages are a bit stark (["Davisville Apartments"], ["Chateau Apartments"], ["Davis Townhouse Apartments"]) while others are a manager/owners dream, complete with floor plans and staged photos: ["Anderson Place Apartments"], ["Casitas"], ["Greystone"], some with textual overlays. ("A better lifestyle"....)<br> + <br> + I was going to respond to Kemble with "Representative pictures is always the goal, preferably user contributed, not cherrypicked by owners/managers."<br> + <br> + Thought I'd open it up to discussion, might be a good project to organize and update the pages from this Apartments listing. Thoughts? -["users/Edwins" ES]<br> + <br> + [[Comments]]</span> </td> </tr> </table> </div> Apartments/Talkhttp://daviswiki.org/Apartments/Talk2010-06-14 08:29:59JabberWokkyPage deleted (mishmash of old or done items plus some confusion about talk pages.) <div id="content" class="wikipage content"> Differences for Apartments/Talk<p><strong></strong></p><table> <tr> <td> <span> Deletions are marked with - . </span> </td> <td> <span> Additions are marked with +. </span> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> Line 1: </td> <td> Line 1: </td> </tr> <tr> <td> <span>- This page is for ["Talk Pages" discussing] the contents of ["Apartments"].<br> - <br> - [[Comments]]<br> - <br> - The spreadsheet is listed under two headings here? Also, while the spreadsheet is neat, I think it should be at the bottom of the page.<br> - <br> - I figured that it made more sense to have the spreadsheet and map at the top, since they provide an overview of the entire apartment rental picture. Then, if you want to focus on a specific area or apartment, you can see it below. In particular, the map is useful for getting a sense of which apartments would be too far out or too inconvenient to live in. The spreadsheet is good for eliminating apartments that lack desired features. -["Users/IDoNotExist"]<br> - <br> - ''2008-04-06 20:47:02'' [[nbsp]] Would it be better if I convert the spreadsheet to a table and upload it to its own page? That way anyone can edit it with their wiki credentials. --["Users/JasonAller"]<br> - ------<br> - ''2009-10-04 23:25:29'' [[nbsp]] I have an apartment for rent in Davis! Please email me at Hadar216@yahoo.com You can move in immediately- located 1 mile from campus with 3 pools and 24 hour gym and study lounge! --["Users/Hadar"]<br> - ------<br> - ''2010-03-17 14:23:50'' [[nbsp]] I noticed that there really don't appear to be any apartment complexes in Davis that state they offer month-month leases. Are there any that people are aware of? Considering the vacancy rate in Davis is starting to rise a little, I would assume complexes would rather have a month-month with some income than to have the unit just sit there. --["Users/B.Egan"]<br> - * Sometimes apartments that don't advertise month-to-month leases will still use them to fill a place if you ask. It'd be worth checking with some rental offices to see if they can accommodate you. Be warned, though, it seems fairly common for apartments to hold off on taking short-term leases until after the new school year starts, since they often fill some units over the summer, and especially once professional students start showing up for classes in August or early September. If you're looking for something relatively short-term, you might check out Craigslist or one of the housing boards for subleases. Students studying abroad love to save on some or all of the rent by filling their room for a quarter, a couple of quarters, or even a full year, and might well accept a month-to-month. Also, be aware that you can save a LOT on subleases, especially in the summer when there are far more subletters than prospective short-term residents. The ["Rental Housing Guide"] may offer some more useful info. --["Users/TomGarberson"]<br> - ------<br> - ''2010-04-01 12:02:22'' [[nbsp]] "745 F Street" is advertising for Fall 2010 on Craigslist and on Davis Housing. Complex seems to be called the "Stratford" but I can find no info about it on this site. Does anyone have any information? --["Users/CMAmmirati"]<br> - ------<br> - ''2010-05-10 18:45:39'' [[nbsp]] I NEED TO FIND AN AWESOME APARTMENT COMPLEXT<br> - <br> - im gonna be a student next year at UCD and am a transfer student. I wanna find an awesome apartment complex that is more upper-end, close to campus, groceries &amp; shopping, and is somewhat lively (maybe not parties every night, but surrounded by people who have a pulse!)<br> - <br> - your help is appreciate :) thanks! --["Users/zsomers1"]</span> </td> <td> <span>+ deleted</span> </td> </tr> </table> </div> Apartments/Talkhttp://daviswiki.org/Apartments/Talk2010-05-10 18:45:39zsomers1Comment added. <div id="content" class="wikipage content"> Differences for Apartments/Talk<p><strong></strong></p><table> <tr> <td> <span> Deletions are marked with - . </span> </td> <td> <span> Additions are marked with +. </span> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> Line 17: </td> <td> Line 17: </td> </tr> <tr> <td> </td> <td> <span>+ ------<br> + ''2010-05-10 18:45:39'' [[nbsp]] I NEED TO FIND AN AWESOME APARTMENT COMPLEXT<br> + <br> + im gonna be a student next year at UCD and am a transfer student. I wanna find an awesome apartment complex that is more upper-end, close to campus, groceries &amp; shopping, and is somewhat lively (maybe not parties every night, but surrounded by people who have a pulse!)<br> + <br> + your help is appreciate :) thanks! --["Users/zsomers1"]</span> </td> </tr> </table> </div> Apartments/Talkhttp://daviswiki.org/Apartments/Talk2010-04-01 12:02:22CMAmmiratiComment added. <div id="content" class="wikipage content"> Differences for Apartments/Talk<p><strong></strong></p><table> <tr> <td> <span> Deletions are marked with - . </span> </td> <td> <span> Additions are marked with +. </span> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> Line 15: </td> <td> Line 15: </td> </tr> <tr> <td> </td> <td> <span>+ ------<br> + ''2010-04-01 12:02:22'' [[nbsp]] "745 F Street" is advertising for Fall 2010 on Craigslist and on Davis Housing. Complex seems to be called the "Stratford" but I can find no info about it on this site. Does anyone have any information? --["Users/CMAmmirati"]</span> </td> </tr> </table> </div> Apartments/Talkhttp://daviswiki.org/Apartments/Talk2010-03-17 15:49:10TomGarbersonReply <div id="content" class="wikipage content"> Differences for Apartments/Talk<p><strong></strong></p><table> <tr> <td> <span> Deletions are marked with - . </span> </td> <td> <span> Additions are marked with +. </span> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> Line 14: </td> <td> Line 14: </td> </tr> <tr> <td> </td> <td> <span>+ * Sometimes apartments that don't advertise month-to-month leases will still use them to fill a place if you ask. It'd be worth checking with some rental offices to see if they can accommodate you. Be warned, though, it seems fairly common for apartments to hold off on taking short-term leases until after the new school year starts, since they often fill some units over the summer, and especially once professional students start showing up for classes in August or early September. If you're looking for something relatively short-term, you might check out Craigslist or one of the housing boards for subleases. Students studying abroad love to save on some or all of the rent by filling their room for a quarter, a couple of quarters, or even a full year, and might well accept a month-to-month. Also, be aware that you can save a LOT on subleases, especially in the summer when there are far more subletters than prospective short-term residents. The ["Rental Housing Guide"] may offer some more useful info. --["Users/TomGarberson"]</span> </td> </tr> </table> </div> Apartments/Talkhttp://daviswiki.org/Apartments/Talk2010-03-17 14:23:50B.EganComment added. <div id="content" class="wikipage content"> Differences for Apartments/Talk<p><strong></strong></p><table> <tr> <td> <span> Deletions are marked with - . </span> </td> <td> <span> Additions are marked with +. </span> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> Line 12: </td> <td> Line 12: </td> </tr> <tr> <td> </td> <td> <span>+ ------<br> + ''2010-03-17 14:23:50'' [[nbsp]] I noticed that there really don't appear to be any apartment complexes in Davis that state they offer month-month leases. Are there any that people are aware of? Considering the vacancy rate in Davis is starting to rise a little, I would assume complexes would rather have a month-month with some income than to have the unit just sit there. --["Users/B.Egan"]</span> </td> </tr> </table> </div> Apartments/Talkhttp://daviswiki.org/Apartments/Talk2009-10-04 23:25:29HadarComment added. <div id="content" class="wikipage content"> Differences for Apartments/Talk<p><strong></strong></p><table> <tr> <td> <span> Deletions are marked with - . </span> </td> <td> <span> Additions are marked with +. </span> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> Line 10: </td> <td> Line 10: </td> </tr> <tr> <td> </td> <td> <span>+ ------<br> + ''2009-10-04 23:25:29'' [[nbsp]] I have an apartment for rent in Davis! Please email me at Hadar216@yahoo.com You can move in immediately- located 1 mile from campus with 3 pools and 24 hour gym and study lounge! --["Users/Hadar"]</span> </td> </tr> </table> </div> Apartments/Talkhttp://daviswiki.org/Apartments/Talk2009-01-08 23:36:43JasonAller <div id="content" class="wikipage content"> Differences for Apartments/Talk<p><strong></strong></p><table> <tr> <td> <span> Deletions are marked with - . </span> </td> <td> <span> Additions are marked with +. </span> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> Line 1: </td> <td> Line 1: </td> </tr> <tr> <td> <span>-</span> This page is for discussing the contents of ["Apartments"]. </td> <td> <span>+</span> This page is for <span>["Talk Pages" </span>discussing<span>]</span> the contents of ["Apartments"].<span><br> + <br> + [[Comments]]</span> </td> </tr> </table> </div> Apartments/Talkhttp://daviswiki.org/Apartments/Talk2008-04-06 20:48:24JasonAller <div id="content" class="wikipage content"> Differences for Apartments/Talk<p><strong></strong></p><table> <tr> <td> <span> Deletions are marked with - . </span> </td> <td> <span> Additions are marked with +. </span> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> Line 6: </td> <td> Line 6: </td> </tr> <tr> <td> </td> <td> <span>+ <br> + ''2008-04-06 20:47:02'' [[nbsp]] Would it be better if I convert the spreadsheet to a table and upload it to its own page? That way anyone can edit it with their wiki credentials. --["Users/JasonAller"]</span> </td> </tr> </table> </div> Apartments/Talkhttp://daviswiki.org/Apartments/Talk2008-04-06 20:36:56IDoNotExist <div id="content" class="wikipage content"> Differences for Apartments/Talk<p><strong></strong></p><table> <tr> <td> <span> Deletions are marked with - . </span> </td> <td> <span> Additions are marked with +. </span> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> Line 4: </td> <td> Line 4: </td> </tr> <tr> <td> </td> <td> <span>+ <br> + I figured that it made more sense to have the spreadsheet and map at the top, since they provide an overview of the entire apartment rental picture. Then, if you want to focus on a specific area or apartment, you can see it below. In particular, the map is useful for getting a sense of which apartments would be too far out or too inconvenient to live in. The spreadsheet is good for eliminating apartments that lack desired features. -["Users/IDoNotExist"]</span> </td> </tr> </table> </div> Apartments/Talkhttp://daviswiki.org/Apartments/Talk2008-04-06 19:59:30PhilipNeustromspreadsheet is listed twice. <div id="content" class="wikipage content"> Differences for Apartments/Talk<p><strong></strong></p><table> <tr> <td> <span> Deletions are marked with - . </span> </td> <td> <span> Additions are marked with +. </span> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> Line 1: </td> <td> Line 1: </td> </tr> <tr> <td> </td> <td> <span>+ This page is for discussing the contents of ["Apartments"].<br> + <br> + The spreadsheet is listed under two headings here? Also, while the spreadsheet is neat, I think it should be at the bottom of the page.</span> </td> </tr> </table> </div>