Bar Taboos

InfoInfo
Search:    
# Date Editor Comment Action
86 2014-08-25 18:25:50 Fructose    view raw print
85 2013-08-25 23:22:16 MikeyCrews I work at a bar and I don't think drawing on receipts is frowned upon.  view raw print
84 2013-08-25 22:04:23 CovertProfessor is this better?  view raw print
83 2013-08-24 20:12:41 MikeyCrews Comment added.  view raw print
82 2013-08-24 19:52:04 JabberWokky    view raw print
81 2013-08-24 16:40:35 CovertProfessor    view raw print
80 2013-08-24 16:06:51 RyanMeyerhoff Comment added.  view raw print
79 2013-08-24 07:11:59 HannahToru Comment added.  view raw print
78 2012-09-11 15:06:56 LanyardLad (quick edit)  view raw print
77 2012-09-11 15:06:29 LanyardLad Deleted a suggestion that one should accept profanity from employees of a bar  view raw print
76 2012-08-31 09:17:29 BarnabasTruman Comment added.  view raw print
75 2012-07-31 22:08:36 MichelleKoehler Falsly identifying as a Peace Officer is a violation of CA Penal Code Sec. 538d  view raw print
74 2012-05-15 13:55:02 jsogul felony drawing of genitalia, eh?  view raw print
73 2012-04-27 22:41:05 ChuckFrank    view raw print
72 2012-04-27 22:38:42 ChuckFrank updated to include Little Prague Rules.  view raw print
71 2012-03-18 10:11:55 WilliamLewis Revert to version 68 (that law only refers to fraudulent use of LEO indicia.).  view raw print
70 2012-03-18 00:56:19 TheDrDonna But you can say you're too old for this shiz.  view raw print
69 2012-03-17 21:23:34 Jrat    view raw print
68 2012-02-04 02:05:53 nathanvazquez Comment added.  view raw print
67 2011-11-05 17:41:14 ndah100    view raw print
66 2011-08-17 23:25:29 MeggoWaffle (quick edit)  view raw print
65 2011-08-17 08:01:19 JabberWokky Also don't use unnecessary commas, but, hey, working, on, it.  view raw print
64 2011-08-17 08:00:36 JabberWokky    view raw print
63 2011-08-17 04:18:36 Wes-P    view raw print
62 2011-08-17 04:15:50 Wes-P Revert to version 60 (oops, sorry Shah.. wrong guy).  view raw print
61 2011-08-17 04:14:41 Wes-P Revert to version 58 (Shah is wrong yet again, at least about public use).  view raw print
60 2011-08-16 22:54:19 TheShah (quick edit)  view raw print
59 2011-08-16 22:47:08 TheShah (quick edit)  view raw print
58 2011-06-16 21:15:41 MasonMurray The google wins again.  view raw print
57 2011-06-16 15:15:13 NikhilDahal More "to the point"  view raw print
56 2011-06-16 15:12:27 NikhilDahal quick edit  view raw print
55 2011-06-16 15:00:12 TomGarberson Clarifying :)  view raw print
54 2011-06-16 14:19:04 TomGarberson It's pretty transparent. Only douches do that at the door.  view raw print
53 2011-06-16 14:05:20 NikhilDahal Just a minor addition  view raw print
52 2011-06-16 01:26:51 hankim We shouldn't suggest breaking the law!  view raw print
51 2011-05-20 23:39:07 NikhilDahal ...you could face minor criminal charges and possibly fines...", funny wiki page  view raw print
50 2011-05-09 21:04:05 RussellFurey (quick edit)  view raw print
49 2011-05-02 18:24:49 MattHh more streamlining for passing out section  view raw print
48 2011-05-02 18:21:36 MattHh some states don't even allow that to be asked on a job ap  view raw print
47 2011-05-02 18:20:03 MattHh helping with some streamlining geez this is way too wordy  view raw print
46 2011-04-09 08:05:54 WilliamLewis    view raw print
45 2011-04-09 08:04:29 WilliamLewis bar patrons aren't the only rude ones in the bar.  view raw print
44 2011-04-09 07:58:43 WilliamLewis (quick edit)  view raw print
43 2011-04-09 07:53:43 WilliamLewis not criminal in the slightest.  view raw print
42 2011-04-09 07:52:51 WilliamLewis it's only illegal sexual harassment if a coworker does it. should rewrite this.  view raw print
41 2011-04-09 07:51:04 WilliamLewis tl;dr  view raw print
40 2011-04-09 07:46:59 WilliamLewis Don't need this summary  view raw print
39 2011-04-09 07:45:45 WilliamLewis more inaccurate legal crap.  view raw print
38 2011-04-09 07:42:57 DougWalter Format & comment  view raw print
37 2011-04-09 07:39:28 WilliamLewis more overly legal crap.  view raw print
36 2011-04-09 07:37:58 WilliamLewis (quick edit)  view raw print
35 2011-04-09 07:37:16 WilliamLewis this is a stretch. and it doesn't need to be here.  view raw print
34 2011-04-09 07:35:12 WilliamLewis (quick edit)  view raw print
33 2011-04-09 07:34:18 WilliamLewis can summarize this in fewer words.  view raw print
32 2011-04-09 07:31:14 DougWalter revised to remove repetition  view raw print
31 2011-04-09 07:25:55 WilliamLewis (quick edit)  view raw print
30 2011-04-09 07:24:09 WilliamLewis    view raw print
29 2011-04-09 07:23:15 WilliamLewis cutting out the unnecessary and inaccurate legal crap.  view raw print
28 2011-04-08 22:34:00 stevie13 California Penal Code Section 640 is not included in Megan's Law  view raw print
27 2011-04-08 22:01:39 stevie13 Modified comment to be polite.  view raw print
26 2011-04-08 21:56:13 stevie13 Comment added.  view raw print
25 2011-04-08 21:52:07 stevie13    view raw print
24 2011-03-13 13:27:44 Wes-P    view raw print
23 2011-03-13 13:00:43 CovertProfessor thanks!  view raw print
22 2011-03-13 12:48:33 jefftolentino One for CP  view raw print
21 2011-03-13 00:42:47 JoePomidor A bit of a tune-up  view raw print
20 2011-03-12 20:19:06 Wes-P    view raw print
19 2011-03-12 18:24:07 Wes-P Typo  view raw print
18 2011-03-12 18:12:10 Wes-P    view raw print
17 2011-03-12 18:11:34 Wes-P Revert to version 15 (revert, subtracting the illegal clause for technicality reasons).  view raw print
16 2011-03-12 18:09:01 WilliamLewis Revert to version 14 (give an actual cite and this can stay. until then, stop it.).  view raw print
15 2011-03-12 18:08:36 Wes-P Revert to version 13 (Check with the PD and the law school profs.. stop being a troll).  view raw print
14 2011-03-12 18:06:03 WilliamLewis Revert to version 12 (you are wrong wes. your sources say no such thing. stop it.).  view raw print
13 2011-03-12 18:04:57 Wes-P Revert to version 11 (Not incorrect information, you need to check your sources sir.).  view raw print
12 2011-03-12 18:03:58 WilliamLewis Revert to version 10 (please don't restore incorrect information).  view raw print
11 2011-03-12 18:03:10 Wes-P    view raw print
10 2011-03-12 17:58:59 WilliamLewis $1000 is not exactly hefty as far as fines go.  view raw print
9 2011-03-12 17:58:10 WilliamLewis not illegal, not practicing law.  view raw print
8 2011-03-12 17:56:20 Wes-P    view raw print
7 2011-03-12 17:49:05 JasonAller    view raw print
6 2011-03-12 17:47:12 JasonAller    view raw print
5 2011-03-12 17:43:04 DonShor a rash of for many years?  view raw print
4 2011-03-12 17:37:12 JasonAller    view raw print
3 2011-03-12 17:22:38 JasonAller    view raw print
2 2011-03-12 17:21:48 JasonAller    view raw print
1 2011-03-12 17:16:36 Wes-P    view raw print
This is a Wiki Spot wiki. Wiki Spot is a 501(c)3 non-profit organization that helps communities collaborate via wikis.