Recent Changes for "Burning Man" - Davis Wiki

Burning Man

JasonAller — 2008-07-13 17:13:49

link fixes

Differences for Burning Man

Deletions are marked with - .	Additions are marked with +.
Line 17:	Line 17:
- ''2005-08-22 10:40:59'' [[nbsp]] Who are the "many" staff that Burning Man consists of? In its "Senior Staff" page, I only see one UCD alumni. And why wasn't he (or they) listed on this Burning Man page? I don't see enough of a connection to Davis that warrants this page. Any disagree? --["JesseSingh"]	+ ''2005-08-22 10:40:59'' [[nbsp]] Who are the "many" staff that Burning Man consists of? In its "Senior Staff" page, I only see one UCD alumni. And why wasn't he (or they) listed on this Burning Man page? I don't see enough of a connection to Davis that warrants this page. Any disagree? --["Users/JesseSingh"]
Line 19:	Line 19:
- ''2005-08-22 10:55:29'' [[nbsp]] Jesse, you may not like this page, but it's sufficiently related to Davis. While I appreciate your thirst for specific data on who the UC Davis contributors of burning man are, I think the fact that "only one" of their 18 senior staff are UC Davis alumni suggests the opposite of what you think it suggests, really. --["JaimeRaba"]	+ ''2005-08-22 10:55:29'' [[nbsp]] Jesse, you may not like this page, but it's sufficiently related to Davis. While I appreciate your thirst for specific data on who the UC Davis contributors of burning man are, I think the fact that "only one" of their 18 senior staff are UC Davis alumni suggests the opposite of what you think it suggests, really. --["Users/JaimeRaba"]
Line 21:	Line 21:
- ''2005-08-22 11:42:23'' [[nbsp]] Check out [http://www.jwz.org/gruntle/burningman.html the hypocracy of Burning Man] --["JimSchwab"]	+ ''2005-08-22 11:42:23'' [[nbsp]] Check out [http://www.jwz.org/gruntle/burningman.html the hypocracy of Burning Man] --["Users/JimSchwab"]
Line 23:	Line 23:
- ''2005-08-22 14:35:56'' [[nbsp]] Yeah, my brother loved Burning Man and went to it every year until it was "ruined" and became a sort of commercial theme park and the type of people attending it changed completely. --["MikeIvanov"]	+ ''2005-08-22 14:35:56'' [[nbsp]] Yeah, my brother loved Burning Man and went to it every year until it was "ruined" and became a sort of commercial theme park and the type of people attending it changed completely. --["Users/MikeIvanov"]
Line 25:	Line 25:
- ''2005-08-22 15:53:49'' [[nbsp]] Well, I think it's better enjoyed as an adventure and an escape. It's gotten so big that it's necessary to impose rules and tax commercial exploitation, otherwise it would be a bigger zoo than it is. It's obviously not what it once was, but I don't think it's hypocracy at stake. In fact, if you look at the hypocracy article cited above, it looks like the author is upset that the originzation is trying to preserve the identity of Burning Man which would otherwise drift into archistic oblivion with so many participants these days. Well, it's huge now and things change, so Jamie Zawinski needs to get over it. --["JaimeRaba"]	+ ''2005-08-22 15:53:49'' [[nbsp]] Well, I think it's better enjoyed as an adventure and an escape. It's gotten so big that it's necessary to impose rules and tax commercial exploitation, otherwise it would be a bigger zoo than it is. It's obviously not what it once was, but I don't think it's hypocracy at stake. In fact, if you look at the hypocracy article cited above, it looks like the author is upset that the originzation is trying to preserve the identity of Burning Man which would otherwise drift into archistic oblivion with so many participants these days. Well, it's huge now and things change, so Jamie Zawinski needs to get over it. --["Users/JaimeRaba"]
Line 27:	Line 27:
- I think the restrictions are more of an attempt to protect those who may be engaging in the above acts but do not want images of themselves doing so to become ''more public'' than within the sphere of the event. ["AmeliaCarlson" aec]	+ I think the restrictions are more of an attempt to protect those who may be engaging in the above acts but do not want images of themselves doing so to become ''more public'' than within the sphere of the event. ["Users/AmeliaCarlson" aec]
Line 30:	Line 30:
- ''2005-09-04 10:43:07'' [[nbsp]] Did anyone from the wiki attend this year? --["JasonAller"]	+ ''2005-09-04 10:43:07'' [[nbsp]] Did anyone from the wiki attend this year? --["Users/JasonAller"]
Line 32:	Line 32:
- ''2006-11-28 17:05:30'' [[nbsp]] I know someone who got dosed with LSD at burning man! --["StevenDaubert"]	+ ''2006-11-28 17:05:30'' [[nbsp]] I know someone who got dosed with LSD at burning man! --["Users/StevenDaubert"]

Burning Man

RalphFinch — 2006-11-30 18:08:11

Removed old news about 2005 dates.

Differences for Burning Man

Deletions are marked with - .	Additions are marked with +.
Line 2:	Line 2:
- - For 2005 the dates are: August 29^th^ until September 5^th^. Tickets are needed, and it is recommended if not required that you read the [http://www.burningman.com/preparation/event_survival/index.html survival guide]

Burning Man

StevenDaubert — 2006-11-28 17:31:04

Revert to version 47 (the Davis Carpool to burning man is related to Davis).

Differences for Burning Man

Deletions are marked with - .	Additions are marked with +.
Line 1:	Line 1:
- deleted	+ [http://www.burningman.com/ Burning Man] is annual festival held at [wiki:WikiPedia:Burning_Man Black Rock City, Nevada], emphasizing art, ecology and community. This festival is popular not only with Davis locals, but also with Davis students--with more than 100 Davis-dwellers in attendance. With over 35,000 temporary residents, Black Rock City is the largest temporary city in the world, but it also qualifies (for one week) as Nevada's fifth largest city. + + For 2005 the dates are: August 29^th^ until September 5^th^. Tickets are needed, and it is recommended if not required that you read the [http://www.burningman.com/preparation/event_survival/index.html survival guide] + + Clothing is optional, and it has a reputation for debauchery (including alcohol, drugs, sex, etc.) However, law enforcement is present and willing to uphold the law. + + [http://www.boingboing.net/images/map05_Psyche_LH.gif Hand drawn map of the site] + + =Events= + The main event is the burning of a large wooden sculpture of a man on Saturday night. + + Another notable event is [http://pic.templetons.com/brad/photo/bm01/crtits/ Critical Tits] an all-female (although some men do join in) topless bike ride, in which there is a particularly bumpy stretch of trail, causing the women's breasts to bounce alluringly or painfully depending on size and your status as a bicyclist or bystander. The ride is usually followed with a free meal for the participants. + + + Since this festival has an environmentalist bent, has a leave-no-trace (zero impact on the ecosystem), and emphasizes community, it makes sense that "Burners" from Davis would want to try to get a group together to go. There is an official [http://burningman.com/preparation/travel_info/rideshare.html Burning Man rideshare] on their site. + + [[Comments()]] + + ''2005-08-22 10:40:59'' [[nbsp]] Who are the "many" staff that Burning Man consists of? In its "Senior Staff" page, I only see one UCD alumni. And why wasn't he (or they) listed on this Burning Man page? I don't see enough of a connection to Davis that warrants this page. Any disagree? --["JesseSingh"] + ------ + ''2005-08-22 10:55:29'' [[nbsp]] Jesse, you may not like this page, but it's sufficiently related to Davis. While I appreciate your thirst for specific data on who the UC Davis contributors of burning man are, I think the fact that "only one" of their 18 senior staff are UC Davis alumni suggests the opposite of what you think it suggests, really. --["JaimeRaba"] + ------ + ''2005-08-22 11:42:23'' [[nbsp]] Check out [http://www.jwz.org/gruntle/burningman.html the hypocracy of Burning Man] --["JimSchwab"] + ------ + ''2005-08-22 14:35:56'' [[nbsp]] Yeah, my brother loved Burning Man and went to it every year until it was "ruined" and became a sort of commercial theme park and the type of people attending it changed completely. --["MikeIvanov"] + ------ + ''2005-08-22 15:53:49'' [[nbsp]] Well, I think it's better enjoyed as an adventure and an escape. It's gotten so big that it's necessary to impose rules and tax commercial exploitation, otherwise it would be a bigger zoo than it is. It's obviously not what it once was, but I don't think it's hypocracy at stake. In fact, if you look at the hypocracy article cited above, it looks like the author is upset that the originzation is trying to preserve the identity of Burning Man which would otherwise drift into archistic oblivion with so many participants these days. Well, it's huge now and things change, so Jamie Zawinski needs to get over it. --["JaimeRaba"] + His concern is that they attempt to control the public's perception of the event by not allowing free photographic reign. Many businesses (such as ["Nugget"]) don't allow you to photograph inside their stores, and they're perfectly within their rights to do that. These restrictions may be contrary to the notions that many associate (whether these are deserved or not) with the festival, such as freedom, cooperation, and anarchy. It's not just about them making some bucks off the photos, either, as they don't allow photographs of "nudity, sexual activity, the use of drugs" to be used by photographers. + I think the restrictions are more of an attempt to protect those who may be engaging in the above acts but do not want images of themselves doing so to become ''more public'' than within the sphere of the event. ["AmeliaCarlson" aec] + Excellent point. However, if the people were readily identifiable then the photographer would have needed them to agree to a model release of their image, because the photo wasn't taken in public (it was taken within a controlled businessed area). Regardless, sometimes these releases are ignored and photos slip out where people are identifiable. The legality of photos of people is murky so I can see the policy as advocating protection. + ------ + ''2005-09-04 10:43:07'' [[nbsp]] Did anyone from the wiki attend this year? --["JasonAller"] + ------ + ''2006-11-28 17:05:30'' [[nbsp]] I know someone who got dosed with LSD at burning man! --["StevenDaubert"]

Burning Man

ChebaccoThirty — 2006-11-28 17:21:16

Page deleted (This is not about Davis.)

Differences for Burning Man

Deletions are marked with - .	Additions are marked with +.
Line 1:	Line 1:
- [http://www.burningman.com/ Burning Man] is annual festival held at [wiki:WikiPedia:Burning_Man Black Rock City, Nevada], emphasizing art, ecology and community. This festival is popular not only with Davis locals, but also with Davis students--with more than 100 Davis-dwellers in attendance. With over 35,000 temporary residents, Black Rock City is the largest temporary city in the world, but it also qualifies (for one week) as Nevada's fifth largest city. - - For 2005 the dates are: August 29^th^ until September 5^th^. Tickets are needed, and it is recommended if not required that you read the [http://www.burningman.com/preparation/event_survival/index.html survival guide] - - Clothing is optional, and it has a reputation for debauchery (including alcohol, drugs, sex, etc.) However, law enforcement is present and willing to uphold the law. - - [http://www.boingboing.net/images/map05_Psyche_LH.gif Hand drawn map of the site] - - =Events= - The main event is the burning of a large wooden sculpture of a man on Saturday night. - - Another notable event is [http://pic.templetons.com/brad/photo/bm01/crtits/ Critical Tits] an all-female (although some men do join in) topless bike ride, in which there is a particularly bumpy stretch of trail, causing the women's breasts to bounce alluringly or painfully depending on size and your status as a bicyclist or bystander. The ride is usually followed with a free meal for the participants. - - - Since this festival has an environmentalist bent, has a leave-no-trace (zero impact on the ecosystem), and emphasizes community, it makes sense that "Burners" from Davis would want to try to get a group together to go. There is an official [http://burningman.com/preparation/travel_info/rideshare.html Burning Man rideshare] on their site. - - [[Comments()]] - - ''2005-08-22 10:40:59'' [[nbsp]] Who are the "many" staff that Burning Man consists of? In its "Senior Staff" page, I only see one UCD alumni. And why wasn't he (or they) listed on this Burning Man page? I don't see enough of a connection to Davis that warrants this page. Any disagree? --["JesseSingh"] - ------ - ''2005-08-22 10:55:29'' [[nbsp]] Jesse, you may not like this page, but it's sufficiently related to Davis. While I appreciate your thirst for specific data on who the UC Davis contributors of burning man are, I think the fact that "only one" of their 18 senior staff are UC Davis alumni suggests the opposite of what you think it suggests, really. --["JaimeRaba"] - ------ - ''2005-08-22 11:42:23'' [[nbsp]] Check out [http://www.jwz.org/gruntle/burningman.html the hypocracy of Burning Man] --["JimSchwab"] - ------ - ''2005-08-22 14:35:56'' [[nbsp]] Yeah, my brother loved Burning Man and went to it every year until it was "ruined" and became a sort of commercial theme park and the type of people attending it changed completely. --["MikeIvanov"] - ------ - ''2005-08-22 15:53:49'' [[nbsp]] Well, I think it's better enjoyed as an adventure and an escape. It's gotten so big that it's necessary to impose rules and tax commercial exploitation, otherwise it would be a bigger zoo than it is. It's obviously not what it once was, but I don't think it's hypocracy at stake. In fact, if you look at the hypocracy article cited above, it looks like the author is upset that the originzation is trying to preserve the identity of Burning Man which would otherwise drift into archistic oblivion with so many participants these days. Well, it's huge now and things change, so Jamie Zawinski needs to get over it. --["JaimeRaba"] - His concern is that they attempt to control the public's perception of the event by not allowing free photographic reign. Many businesses (such as ["Nugget"]) don't allow you to photograph inside their stores, and they're perfectly within their rights to do that. These restrictions may be contrary to the notions that many associate (whether these are deserved or not) with the festival, such as freedom, cooperation, and anarchy. It's not just about them making some bucks off the photos, either, as they don't allow photographs of "nudity, sexual activity, the use of drugs" to be used by photographers. - I think the restrictions are more of an attempt to protect those who may be engaging in the above acts but do not want images of themselves doing so to become ''more public'' than within the sphere of the event. ["AmeliaCarlson" aec] - Excellent point. However, if the people were readily identifiable then the photographer would have needed them to agree to a model release of their image, because the photo wasn't taken in public (it was taken within a controlled businessed area). Regardless, sometimes these releases are ignored and photos slip out where people are identifiable. The legality of photos of people is murky so I can see the policy as advocating protection. - ------ - ''2005-09-04 10:43:07'' [[nbsp]] Did anyone from the wiki attend this year? --["JasonAller"] - ------ - ''2006-11-28 17:05:30'' [[nbsp]] I know someone who got dosed with LSD at burning man! --["StevenDaubert"]	+ deleted

Burning Man

StevenDaubert — 2006-11-28 17:05:30

Comment added.

Differences for Burning Man

Deletions are marked with - .	Additions are marked with +.
Line 1:	Line 1:
- [http://www.burningman.com/ Burning Man] is annual festival held at [wiki:WikiPedia:Burning_Man Black Rock City, Nevada], emphasizing art, ecology and community. This festival is popular not only with Davis locals, but also with Davis students--with more than 100 Davis-dwellers in attendance. With over 35,000 temporary residents, Black Rock City is the largest temporary city in the world, but it also qualifies (for one week) as Nevada's fifth largest city.	+ [http://www.burningman.com/ Burning Man] is annual festival held at [wiki:WikiPedia:Burning_Man Black Rock City, Nevada], emphasizing art, ecology and community. This festival is popular not only with Davis locals, but also with Davis students--with more than 100 Davis-dwellers in attendance. With over 35,000 temporary residents, Black Rock City is the largest temporary city in the world, but it also qualifies (for one week) as Nevada's fifth largest city.
Line 19:	Line 19:
- ''2005-08-22 10:40:59'' [[nbsp]] Who are the "many" staff that Burning Man consists of? In its "Senior Staff" page, I only see one UCD alumni. And why wasn't he (or they) listed on this Burning Man page? I don't see enough of a connection to Davis that warrants this page. Any disagree? --["JesseSingh"]	+ ''2005-08-22 10:40:59'' [[nbsp]] Who are the "many" staff that Burning Man consists of? In its "Senior Staff" page, I only see one UCD alumni. And why wasn't he (or they) listed on this Burning Man page? I don't see enough of a connection to Davis that warrants this page. Any disagree? --["JesseSingh"]
Line 33:	Line 33:
	+ ------ + ''2006-11-28 17:05:30'' [[nbsp]] I know someone who got dosed with LSD at burning man! --["StevenDaubert"]

Burning Man

JasonAller — 2005-09-04 09:43:07

Comment added.

Differences for Burning Man

Deletions are marked with - .	Additions are marked with +.
Line 31:	Line 31:
	+ ------ + ''2005-09-04 10:43:07'' [[nbsp]] Did anyone from the wiki attend this year? --["JasonAller"]

Burning Man

PhilipNeustrom — 2005-08-22 16:41:07

damn previews

Differences for Burning Man

Deletions are marked with - .	Additions are marked with +.
Line 30:	Line 30:
- Excellent point. However, if the people were readily identifiable then the photographer would have needed them to agree to a model release of their image, because the photo wasn't taken in public (it was taken within a controlled businessed area). Regardless, sometimes these releases are ignore and photos slip out where people are identifiable. The legality of photos of people is murky so I can see the policy as advocating protection of said individuals.	+ Excellent point. However, if the people were readily identifiable then the photographer would have needed them to agree to a model release of their image, because the photo wasn't taken in public (it was taken within a controlled businessed area). Regardless, sometimes these releases are ignored and photos slip out where people are identifiable. The legality of photos of people is murky so I can see the policy as advocating protection.

Burning Man

JasonAller — 2005-08-22 16:38:44

re added dates

Differences for Burning Man

Deletions are marked with - .	Additions are marked with +.
Line 2:	Line 2:
	+ + For 2005 the dates are: August 29^th^ until September 5^th^. Tickets are needed, and it is recommended if not required that you read the [http://www.burningman.com/preparation/event_survival/index.html survival guide]

Burning Man

PhilipNeustrom — 2005-08-22 16:38:05

Differences for Burning Man

Deletions are marked with - .	Additions are marked with +.
Line 28:	Line 28:
- Excellent point. However, if the people were readily identifiable then the photographer would have needed them to agree to a model release of their image, because the photo wasn't taken in public (it was taken within a controlled businessed area). Regardless, sometimes these releases are ignore and photos slip out where people are identifiable. The legality of photos of people is murky so I can see the policy as advocating protection of said individuals, but a poor form of protection.	+ Excellent point. However, if the people were readily identifiable then the photographer would have needed them to agree to a model release of their image, because the photo wasn't taken in public (it was taken within a controlled businessed area). Regardless, sometimes these releases are ignore and photos slip out where people are identifiable. The legality of photos of people is murky so I can see the policy as advocating protection of said individuals.

Burning Man

PhilipNeustrom — 2005-08-22 16:37:06

Differences for Burning Man

Deletions are marked with - .	Additions are marked with +.
Line 28:	Line 28:
- Excellent point. However, if the people were readily identifiable then the photographer would have needed them to agree to a model release of their image, because the photo wasn't taken in public (it was taken within a controlled businessed area). Regardless, sometimes these releases are ignore and photos slip out where people are identifiable.	+ Excellent point. However, if the people were readily identifiable then the photographer would have needed them to agree to a model release of their image, because the photo wasn't taken in public (it was taken within a controlled businessed area). Regardless, sometimes these releases are ignore and photos slip out where people are identifiable. The legality of photos of people is murky so I can see the policy as advocating protection of said individuals, but a poor form of protection.

Burning Man

PhilipNeustrom — 2005-08-22 16:34:45

Differences for Burning Man

Deletions are marked with - .	Additions are marked with +.
Line 28:	Line 28:
- Excellent point. However, if the people were readily identifiable then the photographer would have needed them to agree to a model release of their image, becasue the photo wasn't taken in public (it was taken within a controlled businessed area).	+ Excellent point. However, if the people were readily identifiable then the photographer would have needed them to agree to a model release of their image, because the photo wasn't taken in public (it was taken within a controlled businessed area). Regardless, sometimes these releases are ignore and photos slip out where people are identifiable.

Burning Man

PhilipNeustrom — 2005-08-22 16:32:47

Differences for Burning Man

Deletions are marked with - .	Additions are marked with +.
Line 27:	Line 27:
- I think the restrictions are more of an attempt to protect those who may be engaging in the above acts but do not want images of themselves doing so to become ''more public'' than within the sphere of the event. ["AmeliaCarlson" aec] -	+ I think the restrictions are more of an attempt to protect those who may be engaging in the above acts but do not want images of themselves doing so to become ''more public'' than within the sphere of the event. ["AmeliaCarlson" aec] + Excellent point. However, if the people were readily identifiable then the photographer would have needed them to agree to a model release of their image, becasue the photo wasn't taken in public (it was taken within a controlled businessed area).

Burning Man

AmeliaCarlson — 2005-08-22 16:28:13

comment

Differences for Burning Man

Deletions are marked with - .	Additions are marked with +.
Line 27:	Line 27:
	+ I think the restrictions are more of an attempt to protect those who may be engaging in the above acts but do not want images of themselves doing so to become ''more public'' than within the sphere of the event. ["AmeliaCarlson" aec] +

Burning Man

PhilipNeustrom — 2005-08-22 16:20:09

Differences for Burning Man

Deletions are marked with - .	Additions are marked with +.
Line 26:	Line 26:
- His concern is that they attempt to control the public's perception of the event by not allowing free photographic reign. Many businesses (such as ["Nugget"]) don't allow you to photograph inside their stores, and they're perfectly within their rights to do that. It may be contrary to the notions that many associate (whether these are deserved or not) with the festival, such as freedom, cooperation, and anarchy. It's not just about them making some bucks off the photos, either, as they don't allow photographs of "nudity, sexual activity, the use of drugs" to be used by photographers.	+ His concern is that they attempt to control the public's perception of the event by not allowing free photographic reign. Many businesses (such as ["Nugget"]) don't allow you to photograph inside their stores, and they're perfectly within their rights to do that. These restrictions may be contrary to the notions that many associate (whether these are deserved or not) with the festival, such as freedom, cooperation, and anarchy. It's not just about them making some bucks off the photos, either, as they don't allow photographs of "nudity, sexual activity, the use of drugs" to be used by photographers.

Burning Man

PhilipNeustrom — 2005-08-22 16:19:31

Differences for Burning Man

Deletions are marked with - .	Additions are marked with +.
Line 13:	Line 13:
- =RideShare= - Since this festival has an environmentalist bent, and has a leave-no-trace (zero impact on the ecosystem), and emphasizes community, it makes sense that "Burners" from Davis would want to try to get a group together to go.	+ Since this festival has an environmentalist bent, has a leave-no-trace (zero impact on the ecosystem), and emphasizes community, it makes sense that "Burners" from Davis would want to try to get a group together to go. There is an official [http://burningman.com/preparation/travel_info/rideshare.html Burning Man rideshare] on their site.
Line 16:	Line 15:
- [[Comments(Needing/Offering a Ride and other comments:)]] - ------	+ [[Comments()]] +
Line 27:	Line 26:
	+ His concern is that they attempt to control the public's perception of the event by not allowing free photographic reign. Many businesses (such as ["Nugget"]) don't allow you to photograph inside their stores, and they're perfectly within their rights to do that. It may be contrary to the notions that many associate (whether these are deserved or not) with the festival, such as freedom, cooperation, and anarchy. It's not just about them making some bucks off the photos, either, as they don't allow photographs of "nudity, sexual activity, the use of drugs" to be used by photographers.

Burning Man

AmeliaCarlson — 2005-08-22 15:34:26

oops

Differences for Burning Man

Deletions are marked with - .	Additions are marked with +.
Line 10:	Line 10:
- Another notable event is [http://pic.templetons.com/brad/photo/bm01/crtits/ Critical Tits] an all-female (although some men do join in) topless bike ride, in which there is a particularly bumpy stretch of trail, causing the women's to bounce alluringly or painfully depending on size and your status as a bicyclist or bystander. The ride is usually followed with a free meal for the participants.	+ Another notable event is [http://pic.templetons.com/brad/photo/bm01/crtits/ Critical Tits] an all-female (although some men do join in) topless bike ride, in which there is a particularly bumpy stretch of trail, causing the women's breasts to bounce alluringly or painfully depending on size and your status as a bicyclist or bystander. The ride is usually followed with a free meal for the participants.

Burning Man

AmeliaCarlson — 2005-08-22 15:32:31

put some actual info & link about critical tits in

Differences for Burning Man

Deletions are marked with - .	Additions are marked with +.
Line 10:	Line 10:
- Another notable event is the topless bike ride, in which there is a particularly bumpy stretch of trail, causing things to bounce alluringly.	+ Another notable event is [http://pic.templetons.com/brad/photo/bm01/crtits/ Critical Tits] an all-female (although some men do join in) topless bike ride, in which there is a particularly bumpy stretch of trail, causing the women's to bounce alluringly or painfully depending on size and your status as a bicyclist or bystander. The ride is usually followed with a free meal for the participants.

Burning Man

JaimeRaba — 2005-08-22 14:53:49

Comment added.

Differences for Burning Man

Deletions are marked with - .	Additions are marked with +.
Line 25:	Line 25:
	+ ------ + ''2005-08-22 15:53:49'' [[nbsp]] Well, I think it's better enjoyed as an adventure and an escape. It's gotten so big that it's necessary to impose rules and tax commercial exploitation, otherwise it would be a bigger zoo than it is. It's obviously not what it once was, but I don't think it's hypocracy at stake. In fact, if you look at the hypocracy article cited above, it looks like the author is upset that the originzation is trying to preserve the identity of Burning Man which would otherwise drift into archistic oblivion with so many participants these days. Well, it's huge now and things change, so Jamie Zawinski needs to get over it. --["JaimeRaba"]

Burning Man

MikeIvanov — 2005-08-22 13:35:56

Comment added.

Differences for Burning Man

Deletions are marked with - .	Additions are marked with +.
Line 23:	Line 23:
	+ ------ + ''2005-08-22 14:35:56'' [[nbsp]] Yeah, my brother loved Burning Man and went to it every year until it was "ruined" and became a sort of commercial theme park and the type of people attending it changed completely. --["MikeIvanov"]

Burning Man

BrentLaabs — 2005-08-22 12:30:10

comment boxes append to the end of the page, three would not have desired effect

Differences for Burning Man

Deletions are marked with - .	Additions are marked with +.
Line 16:	Line 16:
- [[Comments(I'm offering a ride to Burning Man)]] - - [[Comments(I'm looking to share a ride to Burning Man)]] - - [[Comments(General Comments)]]	+ [[Comments(Needing/Offering a Ride and other comments:)]]

Burning Man

JimSchwab — 2005-08-22 10:42:23

Comment added.

Differences for Burning Man

Deletions are marked with - .	Additions are marked with +.
Line 25:	Line 25:
	+ ------ + ''2005-08-22 11:42:23'' [[nbsp]] Check out [http://www.jwz.org/gruntle/burningman.html the hypocracy of Burning Man] --["JimSchwab"]

Burning Man

ApolloStumpy — 2005-08-22 10:04:43

someone accidentally deleted the events

Differences for Burning Man

Deletions are marked with - .	Additions are marked with +.
Line 4:	Line 4:
	+ + [http://www.boingboing.net/images/map05_Psyche_LH.gif Hand drawn map of the site] + + =Events= + The main event is the burning of a large wooden sculpture of a man on Saturday night. + + Another notable event is the topless bike ride, in which there is a particularly bumpy stretch of trail, causing things to bounce alluringly. +

Burning Man

JaimeRaba — 2005-08-22 09:55:29

Comment added.

Differences for Burning Man

Deletions are marked with - .	Additions are marked with +.
Line 15:	Line 15:
	+ ------ + ''2005-08-22 10:55:29'' [[nbsp]] Jesse, you may not like this page, but it's sufficiently related to Davis. While I appreciate your thirst for specific data on who the UC Davis contributors of burning man are, I think the fact that "only one" of their 18 senior staff are UC Davis alumni suggests the opposite of what you think it suggests, really. --["JaimeRaba"]

Burning Man

JaimeRaba — 2005-08-22 09:49:20

Inserted Jesse's comment he made mid-edit.

Differences for Burning Man

Deletions are marked with - .	Additions are marked with +.
Line 14:	Line 14:
-	+ ''2005-08-22 10:40:59'' [[nbsp]] Who are the "many" staff that Burning Man consists of? In its "Senior Staff" page, I only see one UCD alumni. And why wasn't he (or they) listed on this Burning Man page? I don't see enough of a connection to Davis that warrants this page. Any disagree? --["JesseSingh"]

Burning Man

JaimeRaba — 2005-08-22 09:44:11

Tried to improve to DavisWiki standards.

Differences for Burning Man

Deletions are marked with - .	Additions are marked with +.
Line 1:	Line 1:
- [http://www.burningman.com/ Burning Man] An annual festival held at [wiki:WikiPedia:Burning_Man Black Rock City, Nevada], of which many (how many from Davis?) ["Hippies" hippie] (it isn't classical hippy, isn't it something else entirely?) Davisites are attuned to going.	+ [http://www.burningman.com/ Burning Man] is annual festival held at [wiki:WikiPedia:Burning_Man Black Rock City, Nevada], emphasizing art, ecology and community. This festival is popular not only with Davis locals, but also with Davis students--with more than 100 Davis-dwellers in attendance. With over 35,000 temporary residents, Black Rock City is the largest temporary city in the world, but it also qualifies (for one week) as Nevada's fifth largest city.
Line 3:	Line 3:
- For 2005 the dates are: August 29^th^ until September 5^th^. Tickets are needed, and it is recommended if not required that you read the [http://www.burningman.com/preparation/event_survival/index.html survival guide] - - Clothing is optional. If nudity is the only reason that you are going, look elsewhere. Drugs, too; law enforcement is present and willing to uphold the law. - - =Events= - The main event is the burning of a large wooden sculpture of a man on Saturday night. - - Another notable event is the topless bike ride, in which there is a particularly bumpy stretch of trail, causing things to bounce alluringly.	+ Clothing is optional, and it has a reputation for debauchery (including alcohol, drugs, sex, etc.) However, law enforcement is present and willing to uphold the law.
Line 13:	Line 6:
- Any Burners going? Rides given, rides needed, direction, etc..	+ Since this festival has an environmentalist bent, and has a leave-no-trace (zero impact on the ecosystem), and emphasizes community, it makes sense that "Burners" from Davis would want to try to get a group together to go.
Line 15:	Line 8:
	+ [[Comments(I'm offering a ride to Burning Man)]]
Line 16:	Line 10:
- [[Comments]] - ''2005-08-21 20:24:11'' [[nbsp]] This really doesn't have much to do with Davis at all. "Some people" have gone to a ton of places - that doesn't warrant a page or relevance. But I had to comment....the Reno 911 episode about Burning Man is freaking hilarious. --["EdwinSaada"]	+ [[Comments(I'm looking to share a ride to Burning Man)]] + + [[Comments(General Comments)]]
Line 19:	Line 14:
- ''2005-08-21 20:39:12'' [[nbsp]] If the page had included information on ridesharing up there, or particular ties between Davis and Burning Man... maybe it would feel less like he was just looking to add a page where he could comment on nudity. As it stands the shallowness of this page in its current condition will cause someone to delete it. Something as impressive as Burning Man shouldn't be reduced to a page like this. --["JasonAller"] - ------ - ''2005-08-21 21:16:01'' [[nbsp]] JasonAller caught my thoughts! Let's make all of Apollo's pages valid. Anyone going to Burning Man? I'd be interested in checking it out... --["MichelleAccurso"] - ------ - ''2005-08-21 22:17:30'' [[nbsp]] How do you pay hundreds of dollars to go this? That seems to go against what it was originally meantto be. Plus now, they censor art, have cops arresting people for drug use and patrol the borders for people trying to sneak in... --["JimSchwab"] - You need to move to a place where they actually have civil liberties, like Canada. --["BrentLaabs"] - Ya, freedom aint free...and with all my student loans and low paying jobs I can't afford US freedom....so I guess I need to go to a place where freedom is more socialized. --["JimSchwab"] - ------ - ''2005-08-21 22:59:38'' [[nbsp]] The range of the Davis Wiki has really expanded beyong Davis (or even Yolo County). Someone should make a wiki page on New York City, I hear it's an interesting place. --["JesseSingh"] - Yeah, with the whole six-degrees of separation...or maybe five for the Discordians....you can put everything on the wiki....I think I'll make the Kevin Bacon page soon --["JimSchwab"] - - This page does seem kind of pointless to me. --["PhilipNeustrom"] - ------ - ''2005-08-22 10:40:59'' [[nbsp]] Who are the "many" staff that Burning Man consists of? In its "Senior Staff" page, I only see one UCD alumni. And why wasn't he (or they) listed on this Burning Man page? I don't see enough of a connection to Davis that warrants this page. Any disagree? --["JesseSingh"]	+

Burning Man

JesseSingh — 2005-08-22 09:40:59

Comment added.

Differences for Burning Man

Deletions are marked with - .	Additions are marked with +.
Line 31:	Line 31:
	+ ------ + ''2005-08-22 10:40:59'' [[nbsp]] Who are the "many" staff that Burning Man consists of? In its "Senior Staff" page, I only see one UCD alumni. And why wasn't he (or they) listed on this Burning Man page? I don't see enough of a connection to Davis that warrants this page. Any disagree? --["JesseSingh"]

Burning Man

JaimeRaba — 2005-08-22 09:27:39

Revert to version dated 2005-08-22 09:10:10.

Differences for Burning Man

No differences found!

Burning Man

JaimeRaba — 2005-08-22 09:10:10

Revert to version dated 2005-08-22 08:12:14.

Differences for Burning Man

No differences found!

Burning Man

PhilipNeustrom — 2005-08-22 08:12:14

removed old comments + comment

Differences for Burning Man

Deletions are marked with - .	Additions are marked with +.
Line 17:	Line 17:
- ------ - ''2005-08-21 19:07:52'' [[nbsp]] There is a female topless bike ride, of which one stretch goes over bumpy terrain. I'm sure you know what that means. --["ApolloStumpy"] - ------ - ''2005-08-21 19:36:23'' [[nbsp]] Hey, ["ApolloStumpy"] have you ever been to Burning Man? --["JasonAller"] - ------ - ''2005-08-21 19:44:34'' [[nbsp]] Some of us have --["ApolloStumpy"] - ------ - ''2005-08-21 19:46:31'' [[nbsp]] If you've been surely you can paint a more colorful picture of the event than reducing it to some exposed breasts? --["JasonAller"] - ------ - ''2005-08-21 19:48:01'' [[nbsp]] there were penii, too, but they weren't as remarkable --["ApolloStumpy"] - ------
Line 30:	Line 19:
- ''2005-08-21 20:39:12'' [[nbsp]] If ApolloStumpy had included information on ridesharing up there, or particular ties between Davis and Burning Man... maybe it would feel less like he was just looking to add a page where he could comment on nudity. As it stands the shallowness of this page in its current condition will cause someone to delete it. Something as impressive as Burning Man shouldn't be reduced to a page like this. --["JasonAller"]	+ ''2005-08-21 20:39:12'' [[nbsp]] If the page had included information on ridesharing up there, or particular ties between Davis and Burning Man... maybe it would feel less like he was just looking to add a page where he could comment on nudity. As it stands the shallowness of this page in its current condition will cause someone to delete it. Something as impressive as Burning Man shouldn't be reduced to a page like this. --["JasonAller"]
Line 35:	Line 24:
- ------ - ''2005-08-21 22:30:31'' [[nbsp]] Jim, you need to move to a place where they actually have civil liberties, like Canada. --["BrentLaabs"] - ------ - ''2005-08-21 22:54:17'' [[nbsp]] Ya, freedom aint free...and with all my student loans and low paying jobs I can't afford US freedom....so I guess I need to go to a place where freedom is more socialized. --["JimSchwab"]	+ You need to move to a place where they actually have civil liberties, like Canada. --["BrentLaabs"] + Ya, freedom aint free...and with all my student loans and low paying jobs I can't afford US freedom....so I guess I need to go to a place where freedom is more socialized. --["JimSchwab"]
Line 41:	Line 28:
- ------ - ''2005-08-21 23:02:40'' [[nbsp]] Yeah, with the whole six-degrees of separation...or maybe five for the Discordians....you can put everything on the wiki....I think I'll make the Kevin Bacon page soon --["JimSchwab"]	+ Yeah, with the whole six-degrees of separation...or maybe five for the Discordians....you can put everything on the wiki....I think I'll make the Kevin Bacon page soon --["JimSchwab"] + + This page does seem kind of pointless to me. --["PhilipNeustrom"]

Burning Man

JimSchwab — 2005-08-21 22:02:40

Comment added.

Differences for Burning Man

Deletions are marked with - .	Additions are marked with +.
Line 41:	Line 41:
	+ ------ + ''2005-08-21 23:02:40'' [[nbsp]] Yeah, with the whole six-degrees of separation...or maybe five for the Discordians....you can put everything on the wiki....I think I'll make the Kevin Bacon page soon --["JimSchwab"]

Burning Man

JesseSingh — 2005-08-21 21:59:38

Comment added.

Differences for Burning Man

Deletions are marked with - .	Additions are marked with +.
Line 39:	Line 39:
	+ ------ + ''2005-08-21 22:59:38'' [[nbsp]] The range of the Davis Wiki has really expanded beyong Davis (or even Yolo County). Someone should make a wiki page on New York City, I hear it's an interesting place. --["JesseSingh"]

Burning Man

JimSchwab — 2005-08-21 21:54:17

Comment added.

Differences for Burning Man

Deletions are marked with - .	Additions are marked with +.
Line 37:	Line 37:
	+ ------ + ''2005-08-21 22:54:17'' [[nbsp]] Ya, freedom aint free...and with all my student loans and low paying jobs I can't afford US freedom....so I guess I need to go to a place where freedom is more socialized. --["JimSchwab"]

Burning Man

BrentLaabs — 2005-08-21 21:30:31

Comment added.

Differences for Burning Man

Deletions are marked with - .	Additions are marked with +.
Line 35:	Line 35:
	+ ------ + ''2005-08-21 22:30:31'' [[nbsp]] Jim, you need to move to a place where they actually have civil liberties, like Canada. --["BrentLaabs"]

Burning Man

ApolloStumpy — 2005-08-21 21:23:22

Differences for Burning Man

Deletions are marked with - .	Additions are marked with +.
Line 9:	Line 9:
	+ + Another notable event is the topless bike ride, in which there is a particularly bumpy stretch of trail, causing things to bounce alluringly.

Burning Man

JimSchwab — 2005-08-21 21:17:30

Comment added.

Differences for Burning Man

Deletions are marked with - .	Additions are marked with +.
Line 31:	Line 31:
	+ ------ + ''2005-08-21 22:17:30'' [[nbsp]] How do you pay hundreds of dollars to go this? That seems to go against what it was originally meantto be. Plus now, they censor art, have cops arresting people for drug use and patrol the borders for people trying to sneak in... --["JimSchwab"]

Burning Man

MarieHuynh — 2005-08-21 20:54:10

Differences for Burning Man

Deletions are marked with - .	Additions are marked with +.
Line 8:	Line 8:
- The main even is the burning of a large wooden sculpture of a man on Saturday night.	+ The main event is the burning of a large wooden sculpture of a man on Saturday night.

Burning Man

MichelleAccurso — 2005-08-21 20:46:18

Differences for Burning Man

Deletions are marked with - .	Additions are marked with +.
Line 8:	Line 8:
-
Line 11:	Line 10:
- There is a female topless bike ride, of which one stretch goes over bumpy terrain. I'm sure you know what that means. -- ["ApolloStumpy"]	+ =RideShare= + Any Burners going? Rides given, rides needed, direction, etc.. +
Line 14:	Line 15:
	+ ------ + ''2005-08-21 19:07:52'' [[nbsp]] There is a female topless bike ride, of which one stretch goes over bumpy terrain. I'm sure you know what that means. --["ApolloStumpy"]

Burning Man

JasonAller — 2005-08-21 20:39:31

attempting to lay groundwork for salvage operation

Differences for Burning Man

Deletions are marked with - .	Additions are marked with +.
Line 1:	Line 1:
- An annual festival held at [wiki:WikiPedia:Burning_Man Black Rock City, Nevada], of which many ["Hippies" hippie] Davisites are attuned to going.	+ [http://www.burningman.com/ Burning Man] An annual festival held at [wiki:WikiPedia:Burning_Man Black Rock City, Nevada], of which many (how many from Davis?) ["Hippies" hippie] (it isn't classical hippy, isn't it something else entirely?) Davisites are attuned to going.
Line 3:	Line 3:
- Despite the name, there are no male bodies in flames, per se, though there are many horny ones.	+ For 2005 the dates are: August 29^th^ until September 5^th^. Tickets are needed, and it is recommended if not required that you read the [http://www.burningman.com/preparation/event_survival/index.html survival guide]
Line 5:	Line 5:
- Clothing is optional. Drugs, too.	+ Clothing is optional. If nudity is the only reason that you are going, look elsewhere. Drugs, too; law enforcement is present and willing to uphold the law.
Line 8:	Line 8:
- There is a female topless bike ride, of which one stretch goes over bumpy terrain. I'm sure you know what that means.	+ + The main even is the burning of a large wooden sculpture of a man on Saturday night. + + There is a female topless bike ride, of which one stretch goes over bumpy terrain. I'm sure you know what that means. -- ["ApolloStumpy"]

Burning Man

MichelleAccurso — 2005-08-21 20:16:01

Comment added.

Differences for Burning Man

Deletions are marked with - .	Additions are marked with +.
Line 23:	Line 23:
	+ ------ + ''2005-08-21 21:16:01'' [[nbsp]] JasonAller caught my thoughts! Let's make all of Apollo's pages valid. Anyone going to Burning Man? I'd be interested in checking it out... --["MichelleAccurso"]

Burning Man

JasonAller — 2005-08-21 19:39:12

Comment added.

Differences for Burning Man

Deletions are marked with - .	Additions are marked with +.
Line 21:	Line 21:
	+ ------ + ''2005-08-21 20:39:12'' [[nbsp]] If ApolloStumpy had included information on ridesharing up there, or particular ties between Davis and Burning Man... maybe it would feel less like he was just looking to add a page where he could comment on nudity. As it stands the shallowness of this page in its current condition will cause someone to delete it. Something as impressive as Burning Man shouldn't be reduced to a page like this. --["JasonAller"]

Burning Man

EdwinSaada — 2005-08-21 19:24:11

Comment added.

Differences for Burning Man

Deletions are marked with - .	Additions are marked with +.
Line 19:	Line 19:
	+ ------ + ''2005-08-21 20:24:11'' [[nbsp]] This really doesn't have much to do with Davis at all. "Some people" have gone to a ton of places - that doesn't warrant a page or relevance. But I had to comment....the Reno 911 episode about Burning Man is freaking hilarious. --["EdwinSaada"]

Burning Man

ApolloStumpy — 2005-08-21 18:49:08

Differences for Burning Man

Deletions are marked with - .	Additions are marked with +.
Line 3:	Line 3:
- Clothing is optional.	+ Despite the name, there are no male bodies in flames, per se, though there are many horny ones. + + Clothing is optional. Drugs, too.

Burning Man

ApolloStumpy — 2005-08-21 18:48:01

Comment added.

Differences for Burning Man

Deletions are marked with - .	Additions are marked with +.
Line 15:	Line 15:
	+ ------ + ''2005-08-21 19:48:01'' [[nbsp]] there were penii, too, but they weren't as remarkable --["ApolloStumpy"]

Burning Man

JasonAller — 2005-08-21 18:47:29

typo

Differences for Burning Man

Deletions are marked with - .	Additions are marked with +.
Line 14:	Line 14:
- ''2005-08-21 19:46:31'' [[nbsp]] If you've been surely you can paint a more colorful picture of the even than reducing it to some exposed breasts? --["JasonAller"]	+ ''2005-08-21 19:46:31'' [[nbsp]] If you've been surely you can paint a more colorful picture of the event than reducing it to some exposed breasts? --["JasonAller"]

Burning Man

JasonAller — 2005-08-21 18:46:31

Comment added.

Differences for Burning Man

Deletions are marked with - .	Additions are marked with +.
Line 13:	Line 13:
	+ ------ + ''2005-08-21 19:46:31'' [[nbsp]] If you've been surely you can paint a more colorful picture of the even than reducing it to some exposed breasts? --["JasonAller"]

Burning Man

ApolloStumpy — 2005-08-21 18:44:34

Comment added.

Differences for Burning Man

Deletions are marked with - .	Additions are marked with +.
Line 11:	Line 11:
	+ ------ + ''2005-08-21 19:44:34'' [[nbsp]] Some of us have --["ApolloStumpy"]

Burning Man

JasonAller — 2005-08-21 18:36:23

Comment added.

Differences for Burning Man

Deletions are marked with - .	Additions are marked with +.
Line 9:	Line 9:
	+ ------ + ''2005-08-21 19:36:23'' [[nbsp]] Hey, ["ApolloStumpy"] have you ever been to Burning Man? --["JasonAller"]

Burning Man

JasonAller — 2005-08-21 18:35:29

Differences for Burning Man

Deletions are marked with - .	Additions are marked with +.
Line 7:	Line 7:
	+ + [[Comments]]

Burning Man

BrentLaabs — 2005-08-21 18:18:56

okay that was a little overkill on your description there

Differences for Burning Man

Deletions are marked with - .	Additions are marked with +.
Line 1:	Line 1:
- An annual festival held at Black Rock City, Nevada, of which many hippie Davisites are attuned to going.	+ An annual festival held at [wiki:WikiPedia:Burning_Man Black Rock City, Nevada], of which many ["Hippies" hippie] Davisites are attuned to going.
Line 3:	Line 3:
- Clothing is optional	+ Clothing is optional.
Line 6:	Line 6:
- There is a female topless bike ride, of which one stretch goes over bumpy terrain. You know what that means...''boingy boingy boingy!...schwwiiiiiing!!!!''	+ There is a female topless bike ride, of which one stretch goes over bumpy terrain. I'm sure you know what that means.

Burning Man

ApolloStumpy — 2005-08-21 18:16:20

Differences for Burning Man

Deletions are marked with - .	Additions are marked with +.
Line 6:	Line 6:
- There is a female topless bike ride, of which one stretch goes over bumpy terrain. You know what that means...''boingy boingy boingy!''	+ There is a female topless bike ride, of which one stretch goes over bumpy terrain. You know what that means...''boingy boingy boingy!...schwwiiiiiing!!!!''

Burning Man

ApolloStumpy — 2005-08-21 18:07:52

Differences for Burning Man

Deletions are marked with - .	Additions are marked with +.
Line 1:	Line 1:
	+ An annual festival held at Black Rock City, Nevada, of which many hippie Davisites are attuned to going. + + Clothing is optional + + =Events= + There is a female topless bike ride, of which one stretch goes over bumpy terrain. You know what that means...''boingy boingy boingy!''