Recent Changes for "Campus Expansion Initiative" - Davis Wiki

Campus Expansion Initiative

DylanSchaefer — 2010-12-13 02:52:25

fixing a factual inaccuracy

Differences for Campus Expansion Initiative

Deletions are marked with - .	Additions are marked with +.
Line 3:	Line 3:
- [[Image(electionresults.jpg, "Fall 2002 Election results. The initiative only passed with 8% of the student body voting, as well as difference of only 709 votes.", thumbnail, right)]]	+ [[Image(electionresults.jpg, "Fall 2002 Election results. The initiative passed by a margin of ~8%: 709 votes.", thumbnail, right)]]

Campus Expansion Initiative

BrentLaabs — 2009-03-13 14:09:34

Fees are not increasing, for once

Differences for Campus Expansion Initiative

Deletions are marked with - .	Additions are marked with +.
Line 12:	Line 12:
	+ + The CEI continues to generate controversy. ["SSFAAC"] has twice voted not to increase the fee in accordance with the CPI (inflation), in 2007 and 2009.

Campus Expansion Initiative

JoePomidor — 2009-02-24 16:05:16

Differences for Campus Expansion Initiative

Deletions are marked with - .	Additions are marked with +.
Line 34:	Line 34:
- * '''New Student Health Center.''' The fees will fund the constuction and maintenance of a new upgraded, redesigned, and modernized student health center to accommodate more studnet utilization and advancements in healthcare service delivery.	+ * '''New Student Health Center.''' The fees will fund the construction and maintenance of a new upgraded, redesigned, and modernized student health center to accommodate more student utilization and advancements in health care service delivery.
Line 38:	Line 38:
- The student fees will be collected as showen in the table.	+ The student fees will be collected as shown in the table.

Campus Expansion Initiative

BrentLaabs — 2008-09-04 17:24:26

might as well make this the permanent location

Differences for Campus Expansion Initiative

Deletions are marked with - .	Additions are marked with +.
Line 11:	Line 11:
- [http://math.ucdavis.edu/~jerdonek/cei.pdf Here] is the ASUCD Student Court opinion (dated January 2003) declaring the Campus Expansion Initiative "null and void." ''(Please move the PDF to a more permanent location. Thanks.)	+ [http://math.ucdavis.edu/~jerdonek/cei.pdf Here] is the ASUCD Student Court opinion (dated January 2003) declaring the Campus Expansion Initiative "null and void.": [[File(cei.pdf)]]

Campus Expansion Initiative

BrentLaabs — 2008-09-04 17:23:21

Upload of file cei.pdf.

Campus Expansion Initiative

BrentLaabs — 2008-09-04 17:22:47

fixing links

Differences for Campus Expansion Initiative

Deletions are marked with - .	Additions are marked with +.
Line 7:	Line 7:
- ''I hear the the advisory vote was actually illegal because they put it on the ballot right before the vote, thus not giving opposition any chance to mobolize. Can any one confirm this?''-- ["josephaaronelijahstewart"] - * I can confirm that. It was put on after the normal deadline for ["ASUCD"] Ballot Initiatives, and there is no ["ASUCD Senate" Senate] Bill authorizing the initiative's placement on the ballot. However, it was not ''illegal'', but it did violate ASUCD's Elections Code. ["RobRoy"] is looking into this. --["BrentLaabs"] - * Someone already looked into this shortly after it happened. The Chief Justice of the ["ASUCD Court"] at the time declared the vote "Null and Void" because it was placed on the ballot in violation of the elections codes. I believe that justice was then removed from her position during a closed ["Senate"] session for a reason that I honestly can't remember. Hopefully ["Rob Roy"] can help refresh my memory through his own research. And yes, the ["Senate"] decided around that time that the ["ASUCD Court"] still did not have any power over elections. - ["Paul Amnuaypayoat"]	+ ''I hear the the advisory vote was actually illegal because they put it on the ballot right before the vote, thus not giving opposition any chance to mobolize. Can any one confirm this?''-- ["Users/josephaaronelijahstewart"] + * I can confirm that. It was put on after the normal deadline for ["ASUCD"] Ballot Initiatives, and there is no ["ASUCD Senate" Senate] Bill authorizing the initiative's placement on the ballot. However, it was not ''illegal'', but it did violate ASUCD's Elections Code. ["Users/RobRoy"] is looking into this. --["Users/BrentLaabs"] + * Someone already looked into this shortly after it happened. The Chief Justice of the ["ASUCD Court"] at the time declared the vote "Null and Void" because it was placed on the ballot in violation of the elections codes. I believe that justice was then removed from her position during a closed ["ASUCD Senate" Senate] session for a reason that I honestly can't remember. Hopefully ["Rob Roy"] can help refresh my memory through his own research. And yes, the Senate decided around that time that the ["ASUCD Court"] still did not have any power over elections. - ["Paul Amnuaypayoat"]

Campus Expansion Initiative

MichaelAWoods — 2007-05-22 15:16:08

(quick edit)

Differences for Campus Expansion Initiative

Deletions are marked with - .	Additions are marked with +.
Line 22:	Line 22:
- The student fees will be collected as showen in the table.	+ The student fees will be collected as shown in the table.

Campus Expansion Initiative

MichaelAWoods — 2007-05-22 15:12:52

(quick edit)

Differences for Campus Expansion Initiative

Deletions are marked with - .	Additions are marked with +.
Line 1:	Line 1:
- The Campus Expansion Initiative was influential in pushing the ["Campus" campus] ["Move to D1" move to NCAA Division I-AA athletics]. The initiative resulted in an increase in ["Undergraduate Student Fees" student fees] of $120 on average per quarter for["Undergraduate Students" undergraduate] and $22 for ["Grad Students" graduate students]. The majority of these fees are meant to pay for other ["Campus Buildings" campus buildings] (expansions?). The student vote was purely advisory.	+ The Campus Expansion Initiative was influential in pushing the ["Campus" campus] ["Move to D1" move to NCAA Division I-AA athletics]. The initiative resulted in an increase in ["Undergraduate Student Fees" student fees] of $120 on average per quarter for ["Undergraduate Students" undergraduate] and $22 for ["Grad Students" graduate students]. The majority of these fees are meant to pay for other ["Campus Buildings" campus buildings] (expansions?). The student vote was purely advisory.

Campus Expansion Initiative

SteveOstrowski — 2006-09-14 10:13:20

Differences for Campus Expansion Initiative

Deletions are marked with - .	Additions are marked with +.
Line 1:	Line 1:
- The Campus Expansion Initiative was influential in pushing the ["Campus" campus] ["Move to D1" move to NCAA Division I-AA athletics]. The initiative resulted in an increase in ["Undergraduate Student Fees" student fees] of $92 per quarter for both ["Undergraduate Students" undergraduate] and ["Grad Students" graduate students]. The majority of these fees are meant to pay for other ["Campus Buildings" campus buildings] (expansions?). The student vote was purely advisory.	+ The Campus Expansion Initiative was influential in pushing the ["Campus" campus] ["Move to D1" move to NCAA Division I-AA athletics]. The initiative resulted in an increase in ["Undergraduate Student Fees" student fees] of $120 on average per quarter for["Undergraduate Students" undergraduate] and $22 for ["Grad Students" graduate students]. The majority of these fees are meant to pay for other ["Campus Buildings" campus buildings] (expansions?). The student vote was purely advisory.

Campus Expansion Initiative

PhilipNeustrom — 2006-08-04 16:08:07

moved to right side for readability w/bullets

Differences for Campus Expansion Initiative

Deletions are marked with - .	Additions are marked with +.
Line 2:	Line 2:
- [[Image(electionresults.jpg,"Fall 2002 Election results. The initiative only passed with 8% of the student body voting, as well as difference of only 709 votes.", thumbnail)]]
Line 4:	Line 3:
	+ [[Image(electionresults.jpg, "Fall 2002 Election results. The initiative only passed with 8% of the student body voting, as well as difference of only 709 votes.", thumbnail, right)]]

Campus Expansion Initiative

JamesSchwab — 2006-08-04 16:02:50

Image of election results

Differences for Campus Expansion Initiative

Deletions are marked with - .	Additions are marked with +.
Line 2:	Line 2:
	+ [[Image(electionresults.jpg,"Fall 2002 Election results. The initiative only passed with 8% of the student body voting, as well as difference of only 709 votes.", thumbnail)]] +

Campus Expansion Initiative

JamesSchwab — 2006-08-04 15:57:41

Upload of image electionresults.jpg.

Campus Expansion Initiative

JasonAller — 2006-07-22 10:06:40

Differences for Campus Expansion Initiative

Deletions are marked with - .	Additions are marked with +.
Line 1:	Line 1:
- The Campus Expansion Initiative was influential in pushing the ["Campus" campus] ["Move to D1" move to NCAA Division I-AA athletics]. The initiative resulted in an increase in ["Undergraduate Student Fees" student fees] of $92 per quarter for both ["Undergraduate Students" undergraduate] and ["Grad Students" graduate students]. The majority of these fees are meant to pay for other ["Campus Buildings" campus buildings] (expansions?). The student vote was purely advisory.	+ The Campus Expansion Initiative was influential in pushing the ["Campus" campus] ["Move to D1" move to NCAA Division I-AA athletics]. The initiative resulted in an increase in ["Undergraduate Student Fees" student fees] of $92 per quarter for both ["Undergraduate Students" undergraduate] and ["Grad Students" graduate students]. The majority of these fees are meant to pay for other ["Campus Buildings" campus buildings] (expansions?). The student vote was purely advisory.
Line 9:	Line 9:
- [http://math.ucdavis.edu/~jerdonek/cei.pdf Here] is the ASUCD Student Court opinion (dated January 2003) declaring the Campus Expansion Initiative "null and void." ''(Please move the PDF to a more permanent location. Thanks.)	+ [http://math.ucdavis.edu/~jerdonek/cei.pdf Here] is the ASUCD Student Court opinion (dated January 2003) declaring the Campus Expansion Initiative "null and void." ''(Please move the PDF to a more permanent location. Thanks.)
Line 31:	Line 31:
- [[BR]][[BR]]
Line 42:	Line 41:
-

Campus Expansion Initiative

ChrisJerdonek — 2005-05-27 04:08:21

pdf of asucd student court opinion declaring cei "null and void"

Differences for Campus Expansion Initiative

Deletions are marked with - .	Additions are marked with +.
Line 9:	Line 9:
	+ [http://math.ucdavis.edu/~jerdonek/cei.pdf Here] is the ASUCD Student Court opinion (dated January 2003) declaring the Campus Expansion Initiative "null and void." ''(Please move the PDF to a more permanent location. Thanks.) +
Line 10:	Line 12:
- --> Part A <-- - '''Do you support a student fee that would include the following:'''	+ --> Part A <-- '''Do you support a student fee that would include the following:'''
Line 31:	Line 32:
- --> Part B <-- - '''Do you support a student fee that would include the following:'''	+ --> Part B <-- '''Do you support a student fee that would include the following:'''

Campus Expansion Initiative

PaulAmnuaypayoat — 2005-05-02 05:44:48

more info about the recent history behind this

Differences for Campus Expansion Initiative

Deletions are marked with - .	Additions are marked with +.
Line 7:	Line 7:
-	+ * Someone already looked into this shortly after it happened. The Chief Justice of the ["ASUCD Court"] at the time declared the vote "Null and Void" because it was placed on the ballot in violation of the elections codes. I believe that justice was then removed from her position during a closed ["Senate"] session for a reason that I honestly can't remember. Hopefully ["Rob Roy"] can help refresh my memory through his own research. And yes, the ["Senate"] decided around that time that the ["ASUCD Court"] still did not have any power over elections. - ["Paul Amnuaypayoat"]

Campus Expansion Initiative

BrentLaabs — 2005-05-02 01:55:19

response to joseph

Differences for Campus Expansion Initiative

Deletions are marked with - .	Additions are marked with +.
Line 6:	Line 6:
	+ * I can confirm that. It was put on after the normal deadline for ["ASUCD"] Ballot Initiatives, and there is no ["ASUCD Senate" Senate] Bill authorizing the initiative's placement on the ballot. However, it was not ''illegal'', but it did violate ASUCD's Elections Code. ["RobRoy"] is looking into this. --["BrentLaabs"]
Line 7:	Line 8:
- ''does anyone know what else was on the bill at the time? that would be good info to have here'' -- ["arlen"]

Campus Expansion Initiative

JosephAaronElijahStewart — 2005-05-02 00:11:13

Differences for Campus Expansion Initiative

Deletions are marked with - .	Additions are marked with +.
Line 1:	Line 1:
- The Campus Expansion Initiative was influential in pushing the ["Campus" campus] ["Move to D1" move to NCAA Division I-AA athletics]. The initiative resulted in an increase in ["Undergraduate Student Fees" student fees] of $92 per quarter for both ["Undergraduate Students" undergraduate] and ["Grad Students" graduate students]. The majority of these fees are meant to pay for other ["Campus Buildings" campus buildings] (expansions?). This Initiative was purely an advisory vote.	+ The Campus Expansion Initiative was influential in pushing the ["Campus" campus] ["Move to D1" move to NCAA Division I-AA athletics]. The initiative resulted in an increase in ["Undergraduate Student Fees" student fees] of $92 per quarter for both ["Undergraduate Students" undergraduate] and ["Grad Students" graduate students]. The majority of these fees are meant to pay for other ["Campus Buildings" campus buildings] (expansions?). The student vote was purely advisory.
Line 6:	Line 6:
	+

Campus Expansion Initiative

JosephAaronElijahStewart — 2005-05-02 00:08:39

Differences for Campus Expansion Initiative

Deletions are marked with - .	Additions are marked with +.
Line 1:	Line 1:
- The Campus Expansion Initiative was influential in pushing the ["Campus" campus] ["Move to D1" move to NCAA Division I-AA athletics]. The initiative resulted in an increase in ["Undergraduate Student Fees" student fees] of $92 per quarter for both ["Undergraduate Students" undergraduate] and ["Grad Students" graduate students]. The majority of these fees are meant to pay for other ["Campus Buildings" campus buildings] (expansions?).	+ The Campus Expansion Initiative was influential in pushing the ["Campus" campus] ["Move to D1" move to NCAA Division I-AA athletics]. The initiative resulted in an increase in ["Undergraduate Student Fees" student fees] of $92 per quarter for both ["Undergraduate Students" undergraduate] and ["Grad Students" graduate students]. The majority of these fees are meant to pay for other ["Campus Buildings" campus buildings] (expansions?). This Initiative was purely an advisory vote.
Line 5:	Line 5:
	+ ''I hear the the advisory vote was actually illegal because they put it on the ballot right before the vote, thus not giving opposition any chance to mobolize. Can any one confirm this?''-- ["josephaaronelijahstewart"]

Campus Expansion Initiative

BrentLaabs — 2005-04-06 20:29:15

text of the bill

Differences for Campus Expansion Initiative

Deletions are marked with - .	Additions are marked with +.
Line 6:	Line 6:
	+ + = Text of the Initiative = + --> Part A <-- + '''Do you support a student fee that would include the following:''' + * '''A move to NCAA Division I Intercollegiate Athletics.''' The initiative will allow the University to explore a move from Division II to Division I. If the campus formally declares its intention to transition to Division I, collection of the Student fees will begin in Fall 2003 at a rate that will fund athletic grants-in-aid (only) to the maximum level allowed by the NCAA. + * '''Coffee House Expansion.''' The ASUCD Coffee House will be expanded to accommodate more students and more food services. + * '''Unitrans.''' Fees will be used for new buses, a new Silo bus terminal, and to provide matching funds for Federal grants. + * A '''"Principles of Community Center"''' to co-locate student service departments and provide student intern work space, multicultural educational programming areas and student gathering spaces focused on campus community and student life. + * '''Return to Aid.''' This fee will provide funding to support undergraduate students with the greatest financial need. + + === Schedule and Summary of Fees Per Quarter === + The student fees will be collected as showen in the table. + \|\| [[nbsp]] \|\|<colspan=6>Fees Per Quarter \|\| + \|\|'''Service Supported[[BR]]by Fees'''\|\| 2003-04 \|\| 2004-05 \|\| 2005-06 \|\| 2006-07 \|\| 2007-08 \|\| 2008-09 and [[BR]] beyond \|\| + \|\|Division I\|\|$15\|\|$30\|\|$46\|\|$61\|\|$61\|\|$61\|\| + \|\|Coffee House Expansion\|\|[[nbsp]]\|\|$8\|\|$8\|\|$8\|\|$8\|\|$8\|\| + \|\|Unitrans\|\|[[nbsp]]\|\|$4\|\|$4\|\|$4\|\|$4\|\|$4\|\| + \|\|Sports Clubs & IM\|\|$1\|\|$2\|\|$2\|\|$2\|\|$2\|\|$2\|\| + \|\|Community Center\|\|[[nbsp]]\|\|$13\|\|$13\|\|$13\|\|$13\|\|$13\|\| + \|\|Return to Aid\|\|$4\|\|$16\|\|$20\|\|$25\|\|$25\|\|$25\|\| + \|\|'''Quarterly Total'''\|\|$20\|\|$73\|\|$93\|\|$113\|\|$113\|\|$113\|\| + + [[BR]][[BR]] + --> Part B <-- + '''Do you support a student fee that would include the following:''' + * '''New Student Health Center.''' The fees will fund the constuction and maintenance of a new upgraded, redesigned, and modernized student health center to accommodate more studnet utilization and advancements in healthcare service delivery. + * '''Return to Aid.''' This fee will provide funding to support undergraduate students with the greatest financial need. + + === Schedule and Summary of Fees Per Quarter === + The student fees will be collected as showen in the table. + \|\| [[nbsp]] \|\|<colspan=6>Fees Per Quarter \|\| + \|\|'''Service Supported[[BR]]by Fees'''\|\| 2003-04 \|\| 2004-05 \|\| 2005-06 \|\| 2006-07 \|\| 2007-08 \|\| 2008-09 and [[BR]] beyond \|\| + \|\|Student Health Center\|\|[[nbsp]]\|\|$15\|\|$15\|\|$15\|\|$15\|\|$47\|\| + \|\|Return to Aid\|\|[[nbsp]]\|\|$4\|\|$4\|\|$4\|\|$4\|\|$13\|\| +

Campus Expansion Initiative

MiriamKaufman — 2005-04-05 19:40:39

Differences for Campus Expansion Initiative

Deletions are marked with - .	Additions are marked with +.
Line 1:	Line 1:
- The Campus Expansion Initiative was influential in pushing the ["Campus" campus] ["Move to D1" move to NCAA Division I-AA athletics]. It resulted in an increase in ["Undergraduate Student Fees" student fees] of $92 per quarter for both ["Undergraduate Students" undergraduate] and ["Grad Students" graduate students]. The majority of these fees are meant to pay for other ["Campus Buildings" campus buildings] (expansions?).	+ The Campus Expansion Initiative was influential in pushing the ["Campus" campus] ["Move to D1" move to NCAA Division I-AA athletics]. The initiative resulted in an increase in ["Undergraduate Student Fees" student fees] of $92 per quarter for both ["Undergraduate Students" undergraduate] and ["Grad Students" graduate students]. The majority of these fees are meant to pay for other ["Campus Buildings" campus buildings] (expansions?).

Campus Expansion Initiative

ArlenAbraham — 2005-04-05 19:01:26

moving info to D1 page

Differences for Campus Expansion Initiative

Deletions are marked with - .	Additions are marked with +.
Line 5:	Line 5:
- Advocates of the ["Move to D1" move to D1] argue that it will benefit UCD graduates in the future. While not everyone is involved or interested in athletics, the title of being a D1 school suggests excellence in academia. The UC Davis athletics department has stated that they will maintain a commitment to academia above athletics and will not allow UCD to become a "sports school," which raises the question as to why there is a need for a new ["Multi Use Stadium" multi-use stadium].	+ ''does anyone know what else was on the bill at the time? that would be good info to have here'' -- ["arlen"]

Campus Expansion Initiative

MiriamKaufman — 2005-04-05 15:42:30

grammar, syntax, spelling

Differences for Campus Expansion Initiative

Deletions are marked with - .	Additions are marked with +.
Line 1:	Line 1:
- The Campus Expansion Initiative was influencial in pushing the ["Campus"] into ["Move to D1" moving to NCAA Division I-AA athletics]. It results in a ["Undergraduate Student Fees" student fee] to both ["Undergraduate Students"] and ["Grad Students"] of $92 a quarter. Much of this is to pay for other ["Campus Buildings"].	+ The Campus Expansion Initiative was influential in pushing the ["Campus" campus] ["Move to D1" move to NCAA Division I-AA athletics]. It resulted in an increase in ["Undergraduate Student Fees" student fees] of $92 per quarter for both ["Undergraduate Students" undergraduate] and ["Grad Students" graduate students]. The majority of these fees are meant to pay for other ["Campus Buildings" campus buildings] (expansions?).
Line 3:	Line 3:
- Even though it was approved by 54% of students who voted, it is the worst idea ever -- a [http://www.senate.gov/reference/glossary_term/christmas_tree_bill.htm Christmas Tree Bill] in addition to a worthless athletic expansion.	+ Although the bill was approved by 54% of the voting student body, some argue it is "the worst idea ever," deeming it a [http://www.senate.gov/reference/glossary_term/christmas_tree_bill.htm Christmas Tree Bill], and believe that the athletic expansion was worthless.
Line 5:	Line 5:
- Some argue that the ["Move to D1"] will help UCD graduates in the future. They themselves perhaps not interested in sports, a school and the degrees it confers are often judged by noteritiey of its sports teams. This being said, the UC Davis athletics department maintains a comitment to academia over sports and does not want to make UCD into a sports school, which makes one wonder about the need for a ["Multi Use Stadium"].	+ Advocates of the ["Move to D1" move to D1] argue that it will benefit UCD graduates in the future. While not everyone is involved or interested in athletics, the title of being a D1 school suggests excellence in academia. The UC Davis athletics department has stated that they will maintain a commitment to academia above athletics and will not allow UCD to become a "sports school," which raises the question as to why there is a need for a new ["Multi Use Stadium" multi-use stadium].

Campus Expansion Initiative

PhilipNeustrom — 2005-04-05 14:53:44

Differences for Campus Expansion Initiative

Deletions are marked with - .	Additions are marked with +.
Line 5:	Line 5:
- Some argue that the ["Move to D1"] will help UCD graduates in the future. They themselves perhaps not be interested in sports, a school and the degrees it confers are often judged by noteritiey of its sports teams. This being said, the UC Davis athletics department maintains a comitment to academia over sports and does not want to make UCD into a sports school, which makes one wonder about the need for a ["Multi Use Stadium"].	+ Some argue that the ["Move to D1"] will help UCD graduates in the future. They themselves perhaps not interested in sports, a school and the degrees it confers are often judged by noteritiey of its sports teams. This being said, the UC Davis athletics department maintains a comitment to academia over sports and does not want to make UCD into a sports school, which makes one wonder about the need for a ["Multi Use Stadium"].

Campus Expansion Initiative

PhilipNeustrom — 2005-04-05 14:52:54

phrasing, link fixed

Differences for Campus Expansion Initiative

Deletions are marked with - .	Additions are marked with +.
Line 5:	Line 5:
- Some would argue that the ["Move to D1"] will help UCD graduates in the future. Although they themselves may not be interested in sports, a school and the degrees it confers are often judged by noteritiey of its sports teams. This being said, the UC Davis athletics department maintians a comitment to academia over sports and does not want to make UCD into a sports school, which makes one wonder about the need for a ["Multiuse Stadium"].	+ Some argue that the ["Move to D1"] will help UCD graduates in the future. They themselves perhaps not be interested in sports, a school and the degrees it confers are often judged by noteritiey of its sports teams. This being said, the UC Davis athletics department maintains a comitment to academia over sports and does not want to make UCD into a sports school, which makes one wonder about the need for a ["Multi Use Stadium"].

Campus Expansion Initiative

ArlenAbraham — 2005-04-05 14:08:07

$0.02

Differences for Campus Expansion Initiative

Deletions are marked with - .	Additions are marked with +.
Line 4:	Line 4:
	+ + Some would argue that the ["Move to D1"] will help UCD graduates in the future. Although they themselves may not be interested in sports, a school and the degrees it confers are often judged by noteritiey of its sports teams. This being said, the UC Davis athletics department maintians a comitment to academia over sports and does not want to make UCD into a sports school, which makes one wonder about the need for a ["Multiuse Stadium"].

Campus Expansion Initiative

BrentLaabs — 2005-04-05 13:52:36

might as well link that too.

Differences for Campus Expansion Initiative

Deletions are marked with - .	Additions are marked with +.
Line 1:	Line 1:
- The Campus Expansion Initiative was influencial in pushing the ["Campus"] into ["Move to D1" moving to NCAA Division I-AA athletics]. It results in a ["Undergraduate Student Fees" student fee] to both ["Undergraduate Students"] and ["Grad Students"] of $92 a quarter. Much of this is to pay for other campus buildings.	+ The Campus Expansion Initiative was influencial in pushing the ["Campus"] into ["Move to D1" moving to NCAA Division I-AA athletics]. It results in a ["Undergraduate Student Fees" student fee] to both ["Undergraduate Students"] and ["Grad Students"] of $92 a quarter. Much of this is to pay for other ["Campus Buildings"].

Campus Expansion Initiative

BrentLaabs — 2005-04-05 13:47:04

modified arlen theory

Differences for Campus Expansion Initiative

Deletions are marked with - .	Additions are marked with +.
Line 1:	Line 1:
	+ The Campus Expansion Initiative was influencial in pushing the ["Campus"] into ["Move to D1" moving to NCAA Division I-AA athletics]. It results in a ["Undergraduate Student Fees" student fee] to both ["Undergraduate Students"] and ["Grad Students"] of $92 a quarter. Much of this is to pay for other campus buildings. + + Even though it was approved by 54% of students who voted, it is the worst idea ever -- a [http://www.senate.gov/reference/glossary_term/christmas_tree_bill.htm Christmas Tree Bill] in addition to a worthless athletic expansion.