Recent Changes for "Campus Judicial Board" - Davis Wiki

Campus Judicial Board

pfmcniel — 2008-10-31 10:53:14

Differences for Campus Judicial Board

Deletions are marked with - .	Additions are marked with +.
Line 49:	Line 49:
- \|\|Paul McNiel\|\| pfmcniel@ucdaivs.edu\|\|	+ \|\|Paul McNiel\|\| pfmcniel@ucdavis.edu\|\|

Campus Judicial Board

JabberWokky — 2008-10-13 11:01:16

Differences for Campus Judicial Board

Deletions are marked with - .	Additions are marked with +.
Line 11:	Line 11:
- = Introduction = - The UC Davis Campus Judicial Board (CJB) is a University body which has two primary responsibilities: 1) Educational outreach to faculty and students, 2) Hearing and deciding cases of contested student misconduct. The CJB consists of 12 student members and 8 faculty members. The student members are appointed under the authority of the Vice Chancellor for ["Student Affairs"], but are selected through an interview and recruitment process conducted by the current/outgoing student members and the CJB Staff Advisor (who is also a SJA officer). The faculty members of the Board are appointed by the ["Academic Senate"] and serve on the Board for 2 year periods (IIRC). Because their mission and purpose is closely related to the duties of the Office of ["Student Judicial Affairs"], the two groups often work side-by-side. The students of the CJB work out of the Office of ["Student Judicial Affairs"] in ["Dutton Hall"]	+ + The '''UC Davis Campus Judicial Board''' (CJB) is a University body which has two primary responsibilities: 1) Educational outreach to faculty and students, 2) Hearing and deciding cases of contested student misconduct. The CJB consists of 12 student members and 8 faculty members. The student members are appointed under the authority of the Vice Chancellor for ["Student Affairs"], but are selected through an interview and recruitment process conducted by the current/outgoing student members and the CJB Staff Advisor (who is also a SJA officer). The faculty members of the Board are appointed by the ["Academic Senate"] and serve on the Board for 2 year periods (IIRC). Because their mission and purpose is closely related to the duties of the Office of ["Student Judicial Affairs"], the two groups often work side-by-side. The students of the CJB work out of the Office of ["Student Judicial Affairs"] in ["Dutton Hall"]

Campus Judicial Board

pfmcniel — 2008-10-13 10:49:03

Differences for Campus Judicial Board

Deletions are marked with - .	Additions are marked with +.
Line 43:	Line 43:
- \|\|Mark Waylonis\|\| mtwaylonis@ucdavis.edu\|\| Co-Chair\|\| - \|\|Jennifer Binger \|\| mbinger@ucdavis.edu\|\|Co-Chair\|\|	+ \|\|Co-Chair\|\| Jennifer Binger \|\| mbinger@ucdavis.edu\|\| + \|\|Co-Chair\|\| Mark Waylonis \|\| mtwaylonis@ucdavis.edu\|\|
Line 46:	Line 46:
- \|\|["Users/Alexquan" Alexander Quan] \|\| alquan@ucdavis.edu\|\|	+ \|\|Raymond Concha\|\| rlconcha@ucdavis.edu\|\| + \|\|Amanda Gau\|\| ahgau@ucdavis.edu\|\| + \|\|Melisssa Jost\|\| msjost@ucdavis.edu\|\| + \|\|Paul McNiel\|\| pfmcniel@ucdaivs.edu\|\|
Line 48:	Line 51:
- \|\|Ray Concha\|\| rlconcha@ucdavis.edu\|\| - \|\|Brian Miller \|\| blmiller@ucdavis.edu\|\| - \|\|Mandeep Pooni\|\| mkpooni@ucdavis.edu\|\|	+ \|\|Jessica Moreno\|\| jgmoreno@ucdavis.edu\|\| + \|\|Victoria Phillips\|\| vephillips@ucdavis.edu\|\| + \|\|Mandeep Pooni\|\| mkpooni@ucdavis.edu\|\| + \|\|Alexander Quan \|\| alquan@ucdavis.edu\|\| + \|\|Gabriella Wong\|\| gamwong@ucdavis.edu\|\|

Campus Judicial Board

JasonAller — 2008-08-11 17:05:51

link fixes

Differences for Campus Judicial Board

Deletions are marked with - .	Additions are marked with +.
Line 10:	Line 10:
-
Line 57:	Line 56:
	+ [[Comments]]
Line 58:	Line 58:
- ----- - - - [[Comments]]	+ ''2006-04-22 23:10:47'' [[nbsp]] To RandyStone: I'm sorry, I don't understand. How can one of the primary missions of CJB be outreach to students and faculty, but putting a list of the members online is a privacy concern? Please resolve this paradox. ktxbye --["Users/BrentLaabs"]
Line 63:	Line 60:
- ''2006-04-22 23:10:47'' [[nbsp]] To RandyStone: I'm sorry, I don't understand. How can one of the primary missions of CJB be outreach to students and faculty, but putting a list of the members online is a privacy concern? Please resolve this paradox. ktxbye --["BrentLaabs"]	+ ''2006-04-25 09:33:04'' [[nbsp]] Brent, I cannot comment on CJB membership. Let's just say that former members should not be listed here, okay? If you'd like to post a list of current members, please contact SJA, and they can give you an updated list (updated at the beginning of Spring Quarter 2006). Thanks. --["Users/RandyStone"]
Line 65:	Line 62:
- ''2006-04-25 09:33:04'' [[nbsp]] Brent, I cannot comment on CJB membership. Let's just say that former members should not be listed here, okay? If you'd like to post a list of current members, please contact SJA, and they can give you an updated list (updated at the beginning of Spring Quarter 2006). Thanks. --["RandyStone"]	+ ''2006-04-25 10:02:19'' [[nbsp]] The list is on their website. It's not exactly some big secret. It seems like something that CJB wants to disseminate, in fact. --["Users/WilliamLewis"]
Line 67:	Line 64:
- ''2006-04-25 10:02:19'' [[nbsp]] The list is on their website. It's not exactly some big secret. It seems like something that CJB wants to disseminate, in fact. --["WilliamLewis"]	+ ''2006-04-26 18:28:35'' [[nbsp]] Gee whiz, I stand corrected. Nice to know that their site has been updated. One of these listed members has left, but the list looks current aside from that. I happy to be fond of secrets, however. --["Users/RandyStone"]
Line 69:	Line 66:
- ''2006-04-26 18:28:35'' [[nbsp]] Gee whiz, I stand corrected. Nice to know that their site has been updated. One of these listed members has left, but the list looks current aside from that. I happy to be fond of secrets, however. --["RandyStone"] - ------ - ''2006-09-01 02:44:27'' [[nbsp]] Yes, I'm curious as well... why should people not be allowed to know current or former members' names? --["ElvinLee"]	+ ''2006-09-01 02:44:27'' [[nbsp]] Yes, I'm curious as well... why should people not be allowed to know current or former members' names? --["Users/ElvinLee"]

Campus Judicial Board

AlexQuan — 2008-08-03 22:18:48

Differences for Campus Judicial Board

Deletions are marked with - .	Additions are marked with +.
Line 45:	Line 45:
- \|\|Youchen Wang\|\| ycwang@ucdavis.edu\|\|Co-Chair	+ \|\|Jennifer Binger \|\| mbinger@ucdavis.edu\|\|Co-Chair\|\| +
Line 47:	Line 48:
	+ \|\|Amandala McWright\|\| azmcwright@ucdavis.edu\|\| + \|\|Ray Concha\|\| rlconcha@ucdavis.edu\|\|
Line 48:	Line 51:
- \|\|Amandala McWright\|\| azmcwright@ucdavis.edu\|\| - \|\|Wongsiya Boon-Long \|\| wboonlong@ucdavis.edu\|\| - \|\|Jennifer Binger \|\| mbinger@ucdavis.edu\|\| - \|\|Jamie Davies \|\| jdavies@ucdavis.edu\|\| - \|\|Lisa Lin \|\| lislin@ucdavis.edu\|\| - \|\|Ray Concha\|\| rlconcha@ucdavis.edu\|\|
Line 58:	Line 55:
- Student Judicial Affairs recruits students for open positions on the following year's board during Winter Quarter. Generally, applications are available in January and are due in February. Interested students should contact A. Quan at the email address listed above to be entered in the SJA list-serve for prospective applicants. Everyone from undergraduate students to UCD professional school students are encouraged to apply.	+ Student Judicial Affairs recruits students for open positions on the following year's board during Winter Quarter. Generally, applications are available in January and are due in February. Interested students should contact sja@ucdavis.edu to be entered in the SJA list-serve for prospective applicants. Everyone from undergraduate students to UCD professional school students are encouraged to apply.

Campus Judicial Board

AlexQuan — 2008-05-23 15:53:27

Change in membership

Differences for Campus Judicial Board

Deletions are marked with - .	Additions are marked with +.
Line 41:	Line 41:
- Because the current SJA website has yet to be updated with information about the 2007-2008 Campus Judicial Board, names and contact information will be listed here. Despite names being listed here once then removed because of privacy concerns, campus outreach and promotional activities are part of CJB duties which require availability for contact. All CJB members hold office hours in SJA at varying times.	+ All CJB members hold office hours in SJA at varying times.
Line 43:	Line 43:
- \|\|Anna Bokides \|\| agbokides@ucdavis.edu\|\| Co-Chair\|\|	+
Line 45:	Line 45:
	+ \|\|Youchen Wang\|\| ycwang@ucdavis.edu\|\|Co-Chair
Line 53:	Line 54:
- \|\|Misay Partnof\|\| mapartnof@ucdavis.edu\|\|

Campus Judicial Board

AlexQuan — 2007-11-18 13:58:14

Differences for Campus Judicial Board

Deletions are marked with - .	Additions are marked with +.
Line 58:	Line 58:
- Student Judicial Affairs recruits students for open positions on the following year's board during Winter Quarter. Generally, applications are available in January and are due in February. Interested students should contact A. Quan at the email address listed above to be entered in the SJA list-serve for prospective applicants.	+ Student Judicial Affairs recruits students for open positions on the following year's board during Winter Quarter. Generally, applications are available in January and are due in February. Interested students should contact A. Quan at the email address listed above to be entered in the SJA list-serve for prospective applicants. Everyone from undergraduate students to UCD professional school students are encouraged to apply.

Campus Judicial Board

AlexQuan — 2007-11-17 01:16:47

typo

Differences for Campus Judicial Board

Deletions are marked with - .	Additions are marked with +.
Line 22:	Line 22:
- * ALL Members are Vested Judicial Authorities of ASUCD, in accordance to the ASUCD Constitution.	+ * ALL Members are Vested Judicial Authorities of ASUCD, in accordance with the ASUCD Constitution.

Campus Judicial Board

AlexQuan — 2007-11-16 23:58:08

Added names, contact info, recruitment info, ASUCD

Differences for Campus Judicial Board

Deletions are marked with - .	Additions are marked with +.
Line 31:	Line 31:
	+ It should be noted that if ASUCD cases are referred to Student Judicial Affairs, and those cases are contested by all parties involved, the matter will go to a formal hearing. Most likely, the Campus Judicial Board would preside over that hearing as opposed to a single Hearing Officer which sometimes might be done. +
Line 32:	Line 34:
- ... Too much to say here. I'll save this for another time. The one thing I will for now is that the Campus Judicial Board has existed longer than Student Judicial Affairs has at UC Davis.
Line 34:	Line 35:
- There's a nice history of it on the website, which has now been updated.	+ The Campus Judicial Board was created in 1976 under a "modified" honor code which UC Davis still upholds today. It was created in conjunction with the Academic Code of Conduct along with Student Judicial Affairs. Although the board itself is a fairly recent creation, the involvement of students in the disciplinary process at UC Davis can be traced to the beginning of the 20th century when the first student government was formed. + + More information can be found on the CJB website listed above. + + = Current Campus Judicial Board Appointees = + + Because the current SJA website has yet to be updated with information about the 2007-2008 Campus Judicial Board, names and contact information will be listed here. Despite names being listed here once then removed because of privacy concerns, campus outreach and promotional activities are part of CJB duties which require availability for contact. All CJB members hold office hours in SJA at varying times. + + \|\|Anna Bokides \|\| agbokides@ucdavis.edu\|\| Co-Chair\|\| + \|\|Mark Waylonis\|\| mtwaylonis@ucdavis.edu\|\| Co-Chair\|\| + \|\|["Users/Alexquan" Alexander Quan] \|\| alquan@ucdavis.edu\|\| + \|\|Brian Miller \|\| blmiller@ucdavis.edu\|\| + \|\|Amandala McWright\|\| azmcwright@ucdavis.edu\|\| + \|\|Wongsiya Boon-Long \|\| wboonlong@ucdavis.edu\|\| + \|\|Jennifer Binger \|\| mbinger@ucdavis.edu\|\| + \|\|Jamie Davies \|\| jdavies@ucdavis.edu\|\| + \|\|Lisa Lin \|\| lislin@ucdavis.edu\|\| + \|\|Ray Concha\|\| rlconcha@ucdavis.edu\|\| + \|\|Misay Partnof\|\| mapartnof@ucdavis.edu\|\| + \|\|Mandeep Pooni\|\| mkpooni@ucdavis.edu\|\| + + = Joining the Board = + + Student Judicial Affairs recruits students for open positions on the following year's board during Winter Quarter. Generally, applications are available in January and are due in February. Interested students should contact A. Quan at the email address listed above to be entered in the SJA list-serve for prospective applicants. + +

Campus Judicial Board

JabberWokky — 2007-08-15 07:33:22

(quick edit)

Differences for Campus Judicial Board

Deletions are marked with - .	Additions are marked with +.
Line 21:	Line 21:
- -ALL Members are Campus Judicial Board Appointees. - -ALL Members are Vested Judicial Authorities of ASUCD, in accordance to the ASUCD Constitution. - -ALL Members are UC Davis Campus Officials as defined by the Administration of Student Discipline. - -TWO Members are appointed as Co-chairs of the Board each academic school year. - -ONE Member is appointed as Ex-Officio Undergraduate Student Representative to the Student-Faculty Relationships Committee of the Academic Senate.	+ * ALL Members are Campus Judicial Board Appointees. + * ALL Members are Vested Judicial Authorities of ASUCD, in accordance to the ASUCD Constitution. + * ALL Members are UC Davis Campus Officials as defined by the Administration of Student Discipline. + * TWO Members are appointed as Co-chairs of the Board each academic school year. + * ONE Member is appointed as Ex-Officio Undergraduate Student Representative to the Student-Faculty Relationships Committee of the Academic Senate.

Campus Judicial Board

AlexQuan — 2007-08-14 12:10:50

"Titles Held By Members of the CJB" added.

Differences for Campus Judicial Board

Deletions are marked with - .	Additions are marked with +.
Line 19:	Line 19:
	+ + = Titles Held By Members of the CJB = + -ALL Members are Campus Judicial Board Appointees. + -ALL Members are Vested Judicial Authorities of ASUCD, in accordance to the ASUCD Constitution. + -ALL Members are UC Davis Campus Officials as defined by the Administration of Student Discipline. + -TWO Members are appointed as Co-chairs of the Board each academic school year. + -ONE Member is appointed as Ex-Officio Undergraduate Student Representative to the Student-Faculty Relationships Committee of the Academic Senate.

Campus Judicial Board

AlexQuan — 2007-07-21 08:34:13

Hours of service updated

Differences for Campus Judicial Board

Deletions are marked with - .	Additions are marked with +.
Line 4:	Line 4:
- \|\|9am-12noon, 1pm-4:30pm\|\|	+ \|\| 8:30AM-12:00PM & \|\| + \|\| 1:00PM-4:30PM \|\|

Campus Judicial Board

AlexQuan — 2007-07-20 21:19:42

Relation to ASUCD title added, content added.

Differences for Campus Judicial Board

Deletions are marked with - .	Additions are marked with +.
Line 19:	Line 19:
- As of a few years ago, ["ASUCD"] amended its Government Codes to include the Campus Judicial Board in its procedures. Complaints against the ["Elections Committee"], for example, are to be brought before the Campus Judicial Board. In recent years, this has happened on a few occasions: the so-called ["Election Statement Controversy"], as well as an issue regarding the ["Move to Division I"] in Winter 2002. Under this authority, CJB heard and decided the ["Election Statement Controversy"] of Fall 2004. CJB eventually ruled against the Elections Committee, but declined to recommend disciplinary action (instead leaving this to the discretion of the Senate). Shortly afterwards, ["ASUCD"] removed CJB from its role in procedural review, returning such powers to the ["ASUCD Court"].	+ = Relation to ASUCD = + + As of a few years ago, ["ASUCD"] amended its Government Codes to include the Campus Judicial Board in its procedures. Complaints against the ["Elections Committee"], for example, are to be brought before the Campus Judicial Board. In recent years, this has happened on a few occasions: the so-called ["Election Statement Controversy"], as well as an issue regarding the ["Move to Division I"] in Winter 2002. Under this authority, CJB heard and decided the ["Election Statement Controversy"] of Fall 2004. CJB eventually ruled against the Elections Committee, but declined to recommend disciplinary action (instead leaving this to the discretion of the Senate). Shortly afterwards, ["ASUCD"] removed CJB from its role in procedural review, returning such powers to the ["ASUCD Court"]. Although the CJB appears powerless now within ASUCD functions, it is still mentioned in the ["ASUCD Constitution"] as having the ASUCD's judicial power vested within it. Hence, purely in name, the CJB remains a figurehead of ASUCD judicial authority, alongside the power-enabled ASUCD Court. Since this relation still exists, campaigns within student government are prohibited from utilizing endorsements from CJB members, as a way of promoting the impartial image of the CJB.

Campus Judicial Board

AlexQuan — 2007-07-20 20:49:33

Student Conduct Committee outdated and deleted.

Differences for Campus Judicial Board

Deletions are marked with - .	Additions are marked with +.
Line 17:	Line 17:
- Typically, Campus Judicial Board hearings will be heard by a panel consisting of 2 student members and 1 faculty member. One of the student members chairs the formal hearing. For more serious violations, hearings are brought before the ["Student Conduct Committee"], which is a body that has a slightly different mandate (and thus extended powers, such as dismissal and suspension). However, students who are appointed to CJB also receive a co-appointment to the SCC. One of the other ways ["Student Conduct Committee"] hearings differ from CJB hearings is that they typically (but not always) have a faculty majority (2) and student minority (1). SCC Hearings are chaired by a faculty member as well, usually a faculty member from the UC Davis Law School (["King Hall"]).	+ Typically, Campus Judicial Board hearings will be heard by a panel consisting of 2 student members and 1 faculty member. One of the student members chairs the formal hearing. Previously, more serious cases under SJA jurisdiction would go to the Student Conduct Committee, however, that set-up has recently been eliminated. All cases that warrant a formal hearing now go to the Campus Judicial Board. Incidents that can result in a referral to SJA can occur on-campus and off-campus and can range from ["Academic Dishonesty"] to assault.

Campus Judicial Board

ElvinLee — 2006-09-01 01:50:02

Differences for Campus Judicial Board

Deletions are marked with - .	Additions are marked with +.
Line 8:	Line 8:
- \|\|[http://sja.ucdavis.edu/cjb.htm]\|\|	+ \|\|[http://sja.ucdavis.edu/cjb]\|\|
Line 19:	Line 19:
- As of a few years ago, ["ASUCD"] amended its Government Codes to include the Campus Judicial Board in its procedures. Complaints against the ["Elections Committee"], for example, are to be brought before the Campus Judicial Board. In recent years, this has happened on a few occasions: the so-called ["Election Statement Controversy"], as well as an issue regarding the ["Move to Division I"] in Winter 2002.	+ As of a few years ago, ["ASUCD"] amended its Government Codes to include the Campus Judicial Board in its procedures. Complaints against the ["Elections Committee"], for example, are to be brought before the Campus Judicial Board. In recent years, this has happened on a few occasions: the so-called ["Election Statement Controversy"], as well as an issue regarding the ["Move to Division I"] in Winter 2002. Under this authority, CJB heard and decided the ["Election Statement Controversy"] of Fall 2004. CJB eventually ruled against the Elections Committee, but declined to recommend disciplinary action (instead leaving this to the discretion of the Senate). Shortly afterwards, ["ASUCD"] removed CJB from its role in procedural review, returning such powers to the ["ASUCD Court"].

Campus Judicial Board

ElvinLee — 2006-09-01 01:44:27

Comment added.

Differences for Campus Judicial Board

Deletions are marked with - .	Additions are marked with +.
Line 37:	Line 37:
	+ ------ + ''2006-09-01 02:44:27'' [[nbsp]] Yes, I'm curious as well... why should people not be allowed to know current or former members' names? --["ElvinLee"]

Campus Judicial Board

RandyStone — 2006-04-26 17:28:35

Comment added.

Differences for Campus Judicial Board

Deletions are marked with - .	Additions are marked with +.
Line 1:	Line 1:
- \|\|<bgcolor='#E0E0FF'>'''Location'''\|\|<\|8>[[nbsp]][[nbsp]]\|\|<\|8>borderless:cjb.jpg\|\|<^\|8> [[TableOfContents]] \|\|	+ \|\|<bgcolor='#E0E0FF'>'''Location'''\|\|<\|8>[[nbsp]][[nbsp]]\|\|<\|8>[[Image(cjb.jpg, noborder)]]\|\|<^\|8> [[TableOfContents]] \|\|
Line 35:	Line 35:
	+ ------ + ''2006-04-26 18:28:35'' [[nbsp]] Gee whiz, I stand corrected. Nice to know that their site has been updated. One of these listed members has left, but the list looks current aside from that. I happy to be fond of secrets, however. --["RandyStone"]

Campus Judicial Board

WilliamLewis — 2006-04-25 09:02:19

Comment added.

Differences for Campus Judicial Board

Deletions are marked with - .	Additions are marked with +.
Line 33:	Line 33:
	+ ------ + ''2006-04-25 10:02:19'' [[nbsp]] The list is on their website. It's not exactly some big secret. It seems like something that CJB wants to disseminate, in fact. --["WilliamLewis"]

Campus Judicial Board

JabberWokky — 2006-04-25 08:36:11

Differences for Campus Judicial Board

Deletions are marked with - .	Additions are marked with +.
Line 1:	Line 1:
- \|\|<bgcolor='#E0E0FF'>'''Location'''\|\|<\|8>[[nbsp]][[nbsp]]\|\|<\|8>attachment:cjb.jpg\|\|<^\|8> [[TableOfContents]] \|\|	+ \|\|<bgcolor='#E0E0FF'>'''Location'''\|\|<\|8>[[nbsp]][[nbsp]]\|\|<\|8>borderless:cjb.jpg\|\|<^\|8> [[TableOfContents]] \|\|

Campus Judicial Board

RandyStone — 2006-04-25 08:33:04

Comment added.

Differences for Campus Judicial Board

Deletions are marked with - .	Additions are marked with +.
Line 31:	Line 31:
	+ ------ + ''2006-04-25 09:33:04'' [[nbsp]] Brent, I cannot comment on CJB membership. Let's just say that former members should not be listed here, okay? If you'd like to post a list of current members, please contact SJA, and they can give you an updated list (updated at the beginning of Spring Quarter 2006). Thanks. --["RandyStone"]

Campus Judicial Board

BrentLaabs — 2006-04-22 22:10:47

Comment added.

Differences for Campus Judicial Board

Deletions are marked with - .	Additions are marked with +.
Line 29:	Line 29:
	+ ------ + ''2006-04-22 23:10:47'' [[nbsp]] To RandyStone: I'm sorry, I don't understand. How can one of the primary missions of CJB be outreach to students and faculty, but putting a list of the members online is a privacy concern? Please resolve this paradox. ktxbye --["BrentLaabs"]

Campus Judicial Board

RandyStone — 2006-04-21 14:07:32

Differences for Campus Judicial Board

Deletions are marked with - .	Additions are marked with +.
Line 15:	Line 15:
- CJB can also refer to simply the (12) student members, as they will meet and work together to conduct campus outreach programs in order to promote academic and social integrity amongst students. Other responsibilities of CJB students include serving as advisors or advocates for students or faculty who are going into formal hearings (for contested misconduct). CJB students also conduct follow-up meetings with students who have been through the informal disciplinary process to obtain valuable assessment information, as well as help facilitate a more comprehensive learning experience for students who have been referred for misconduct. Responsibilities and duties of CJB students have been known to vary, as well.	+ CJB can also refer only to the student members, as they will meet and work together to conduct campus outreach programs in order to promote academic and social integrity amongst students. Other responsibilities of CJB students include serving as advisors or advocates for students or faculty who are going into formal hearings (for contested misconduct). CJB students also conduct follow-up meetings with students who have been through the informal disciplinary process to obtain valuable assessment information, as well as help facilitate a more comprehensive learning experience for students who have been referred for misconduct. Responsibilities and duties of CJB students have been known to vary, as well.

Campus Judicial Board

RandyStone — 2006-04-21 14:04:42

Differences for Campus Judicial Board

Deletions are marked with - .	Additions are marked with +.
Line 12:	Line 12:
- The UC Davis Campus Judicial Board (CJB) is a University body which has two primary responsibilies: 1) Educational outreach to faculty and students, 2) Hearing and deciding cases of contested student misconduct. The CJB consists of 12 student members and 8 faculty members. The student members are appointed under the authority of the Vice Chancellor for ["Student Affairs"], but are selected through an interview and recruitment process conducted by the current/outgoing student members and the CJB Staff Advisor (who is also a SJA officer). The faculty members of the Board are appointed by the ["Academic Senate"] and serve on the Board for 2 year periods (IIRC). Because their mission and purpose is closely related to the duties of the Office of ["Student Judicial Affairs"], the two groups often work side-by-side. The students of the CJB work out of the Office of ["Student Judicial Affairs"] in ["Dutton Hall"]	+ The UC Davis Campus Judicial Board (CJB) is a University body which has two primary responsibilities: 1) Educational outreach to faculty and students, 2) Hearing and deciding cases of contested student misconduct. The CJB consists of 12 student members and 8 faculty members. The student members are appointed under the authority of the Vice Chancellor for ["Student Affairs"], but are selected through an interview and recruitment process conducted by the current/outgoing student members and the CJB Staff Advisor (who is also a SJA officer). The faculty members of the Board are appointed by the ["Academic Senate"] and serve on the Board for 2 year periods (IIRC). Because their mission and purpose is closely related to the duties of the Office of ["Student Judicial Affairs"], the two groups often work side-by-side. The students of the CJB work out of the Office of ["Student Judicial Affairs"] in ["Dutton Hall"]

Campus Judicial Board

RandyStone — 2006-04-21 14:02:59

Because of privacy concerns, the names of student CJB members have been deleted.

Differences for Campus Judicial Board

Deletions are marked with - .	Additions are marked with +.
Line 12:	Line 12:
- The UC Davis Campus Judicial Board, or CJB for short, is a University body which has the primary responsibility of hearing and deciding cases of contested student misconduct. CJB "proper" usually consists of 12 student members and 4 faculty members. The student members are appointed under the authority of the Vice Chancellor of ["Student Affairs"], but are typically selected through an interview and recruitment process conducted by the current/outgoing student members and the CJB Staff Advisor (who is an SJA officer). The faculty members of the Board are appointed by the ["Academic Senate"] and serve on the Board for 2 year periods (IIRC). Because their mission and purpose is closely related to the duties of the Office of ["Student Judicial Affairs"], the two groups often work side-by-side. The students of the Campus Judicial Board work out of the Office of ["Student Judicial Affairs"] in ["Dutton Hall"]	+ The UC Davis Campus Judicial Board (CJB) is a University body which has two primary responsibilies: 1) Educational outreach to faculty and students, 2) Hearing and deciding cases of contested student misconduct. The CJB consists of 12 student members and 8 faculty members. The student members are appointed under the authority of the Vice Chancellor for ["Student Affairs"], but are selected through an interview and recruitment process conducted by the current/outgoing student members and the CJB Staff Advisor (who is also a SJA officer). The faculty members of the Board are appointed by the ["Academic Senate"] and serve on the Board for 2 year periods (IIRC). Because their mission and purpose is closely related to the duties of the Office of ["Student Judicial Affairs"], the two groups often work side-by-side. The students of the CJB work out of the Office of ["Student Judicial Affairs"] in ["Dutton Hall"]
Line 21:	Line 21:
- = Membership = - While the roster on the website is outdated, the current (2004-2005) student members of the Campus Judicial Board are: - * ["ElvinLee" Elvin Lee], co-Chair - * ["Michael Fein"], co-Chair - * ["Daniel Braunschweig"] - * ["Dana Davies-Shawhyde"] - * ["Dirk Daza"] - * ["Leona Dondi"] - * ["Jennifer Frost"] - * ["Carla Hernandez"] - * ["Oliver Hsu"] - * ["Dustin Ingraham"] - * ["Venessa Laurel"] - * ["Eimi Stokes"] -
Line 39:	Line 24:
- There's a nice history of it on the website.	+ There's a nice history of it on the website, which has now been updated.

Campus Judicial Board

BrentLaabs — 2006-04-05 14:20:14

Differences for Campus Judicial Board

Deletions are marked with - .	Additions are marked with +.
Line 1:	Line 1:
- attachment:cjb.jpg	+ \|\|<bgcolor='#E0E0FF'>'''Location'''\|\|<\|8>[[nbsp]][[nbsp]]\|\|<\|8>attachment:cjb.jpg\|\|<^\|8> [[TableOfContents]] \|\| + \|\|3200 ["Dutton Hall"]\|\| + \|\|<bgcolor='#E0E0FF'>'''Hours'''\|\| + \|\|9am-12noon, 1pm-4:30pm\|\| + \|\|<bgcolor='#E0E0FF'>'''Phone'''\|\| + \|\|(530)752-1128\|\| + \|\|<bgcolor='#E0E0FF'>'''Website'''\|\| + \|\|[http://sja.ucdavis.edu/cjb.htm]\|\|
Line 3:	Line 10:
- - [[TableOfContents]]
Line 33:	Line 38:
	+ + There's a nice history of it on the website.
Line 34:	Line 41:
- \|\|<bgcolor='#E0E0FF'>'''Location'''\|\| - \|\|3200 Dutton Hall\|\| - \|\|<bgcolor='#E0E0FF'>'''Hours'''\|\| - \|\|9am-12noon, 1pm-4:30pm\|\| - \|\|<bgcolor='#E0E0FF'>'''Phone'''\|\| - \|\|(530)752-1128\|\| - \|\|<bgcolor='#E0E0FF'>'''Website'''\|\| - \|\|[http://sja.ucdavis.edu/cjb.htm]\|\|	+

Campus Judicial Board

VivianPham — 2005-05-14 23:23:49

Differences for Campus Judicial Board

Deletions are marked with - .	Additions are marked with +.
Line 19:	Line 19:
- * Michael Fein, co-Chair - * Daniel Braunschweig - * Dana Davies-Shawhyde - * Dirk Daza - * Leona Dondi - * Jennifer Frost - * Carla Hernandez - * Oliver Hsu - * Dustin Ingraham - * Venessa Laurel - * Eimi Stokes	+ * ["Michael Fein"], co-Chair + * ["Daniel Braunschweig"] + * ["Dana Davies-Shawhyde"] + * ["Dirk Daza"] + * ["Leona Dondi"] + * ["Jennifer Frost"] + * ["Carla Hernandez"] + * ["Oliver Hsu"] + * ["Dustin Ingraham"] + * ["Venessa Laurel"] + * ["Eimi Stokes"]

Campus Judicial Board

AmeliaCarlson — 2005-03-22 11:18:03

Revert to version dated 2005-03-19 13:53:10.

Differences for Campus Judicial Board

Deletions are marked with - .	Additions are marked with +.
Line 7:	Line 7:
- The[[nbsp]]UC[[nbsp]]Davis[[nbsp]]Campus[[nbsp]]Judicial[[nbsp]]Board,[[nbsp]]or[[nbsp]]CJB[[nbsp]]for[[nbsp]]short,[[nbsp]]is[[nbsp]]a[[nbsp]]University[[nbsp]]body[[nbsp]]which[[nbsp]]has[[nbsp]]the[[nbsp]]primary[[nbsp]]responsibility[[nbsp]]of[[nbsp]]hearing[[nbsp]]and[[nbsp]]deciding[[nbsp]]cases[[nbsp]]of[[nbsp]]contested[[nbsp]]student[[nbsp]]misconduct.[[nbsp]]CJB[[nbsp]]"proper"[[nbsp]]usually[[nbsp]]consists[[nbsp]]of[[nbsp]]12[[nbsp]]student[[nbsp]]members[[nbsp]]and[[nbsp]]4[[nbsp]]faculty[[nbsp]]members.[[nbsp]]The[[nbsp]]student[[nbsp]]members[[nbsp]]are[[nbsp]]appointed[[nbsp]]under[[nbsp]]the[[nbsp]]authority[[nbsp]]of[[nbsp]]the[[nbsp]]Vice[[nbsp]]Chancellor[[nbsp]]of[[nbsp]]["Student Affairs" Student_Affairs],[[nbsp]]but[[nbsp]]are[[nbsp]]typically[[nbsp]]selected[[nbsp]]through[[nbsp]]an[[nbsp]]interview[[nbsp]]and[[nbsp]]recruitment[[nbsp]]process[[nbsp]]conducted[[nbsp]]by[[nbsp]]the[[nbsp]]current/outgoing[[nbsp]]student[[nbsp]]members[[nbsp]]and[[nbsp]]the[[nbsp]]CJB[[nbsp]]Staff[[nbsp]]Advisor[[nbsp]](who[[nbsp]]is[[nbsp]]an[[nbsp]]SJA[[nbsp]]officer).[[nbsp]]The[[nbsp]]faculty[[nbsp]]members[[nbsp]]of[[nbsp]]the[[nbsp]]Board[[nbsp]]are[[nbsp]]appointed[[nbsp]]by[[nbsp]]the[[nbsp]]["Academic Senate" Academic_Senate][[nbsp]]and[[nbsp]]serve[[nbsp]]on[[nbsp]]the[[nbsp]]Board[[nbsp]]for[[nbsp]]2[[nbsp]]year[[nbsp]]periods[[nbsp]](IIRC).[[nbsp]]Because[[nbsp]]their[[nbsp]]mission[[nbsp]]and[[nbsp]]purpose[[nbsp]]is[[nbsp]]closely[[nbsp]]related[[nbsp]]to[[nbsp]]the[[nbsp]]duties[[nbsp]]of[[nbsp]]the[[nbsp]]Office[[nbsp]]of[[nbsp]]["Student Judicial Affairs" Student_Judicial_Affairs],[[nbsp]]the[[nbsp]]two[[nbsp]]groups[[nbsp]]often[[nbsp]]work[[nbsp]]side-by-side.[[nbsp]]The[[nbsp]]students[[nbsp]]of[[nbsp]]the[[nbsp]]Campus[[nbsp]]Judicial[[nbsp]]Board[[nbsp]]work[[nbsp]]out[[nbsp]]of[[nbsp]]the[[nbsp]]Office[[nbsp]]of[[nbsp]]["Student Judicial Affairs" Student_Judicial_Affairs][[nbsp]]in[[nbsp]]["Dutton Hall" Dutton_Hall]	+ The UC Davis Campus Judicial Board, or CJB for short, is a University body which has the primary responsibility of hearing and deciding cases of contested student misconduct. CJB "proper" usually consists of 12 student members and 4 faculty members. The student members are appointed under the authority of the Vice Chancellor of ["Student Affairs"], but are typically selected through an interview and recruitment process conducted by the current/outgoing student members and the CJB Staff Advisor (who is an SJA officer). The faculty members of the Board are appointed by the ["Academic Senate"] and serve on the Board for 2 year periods (IIRC). Because their mission and purpose is closely related to the duties of the Office of ["Student Judicial Affairs"], the two groups often work side-by-side. The students of the Campus Judicial Board work out of the Office of ["Student Judicial Affairs"] in ["Dutton Hall"]
Line 10:	Line 10:
- CJB[[nbsp]]can[[nbsp]]also[[nbsp]]refer[[nbsp]]to[[nbsp]]simply[[nbsp]]the[[nbsp]](12)[[nbsp]]student[[nbsp]]members,[[nbsp]]as[[nbsp]]they[[nbsp]]will[[nbsp]]meet[[nbsp]]and[[nbsp]]work[[nbsp]]together[[nbsp]]to[[nbsp]]conduct[[nbsp]]campus[[nbsp]]outreach[[nbsp]]programs[[nbsp]]in[[nbsp]]order[[nbsp]]to[[nbsp]]promote[[nbsp]]academic[[nbsp]]and[[nbsp]]social[[nbsp]]integrity[[nbsp]]amongst[[nbsp]]students.[[nbsp]]Other[[nbsp]]responsibilities[[nbsp]]of[[nbsp]]CJB[[nbsp]]students[[nbsp]]include[[nbsp]]serving[[nbsp]]as[[nbsp]]advisors[[nbsp]]or[[nbsp]]advocates[[nbsp]]for[[nbsp]]students[[nbsp]]or[[nbsp]]faculty[[nbsp]]who[[nbsp]]are[[nbsp]]going[[nbsp]]into[[nbsp]]formal[[nbsp]]hearings[[nbsp]](for[[nbsp]]contested[[nbsp]]misconduct).[[nbsp]]CJB[[nbsp]]students[[nbsp]]also[[nbsp]]conduct[[nbsp]]follow-up[[nbsp]]meetings[[nbsp]]with[[nbsp]]students[[nbsp]]who[[nbsp]]have[[nbsp]]been[[nbsp]]through[[nbsp]]the[[nbsp]]informal[[nbsp]]disciplinary[[nbsp]]process[[nbsp]]to[[nbsp]]obtain[[nbsp]]valuable[[nbsp]]assessment[[nbsp]]information,[[nbsp]]as[[nbsp]]well[[nbsp]]as[[nbsp]]help[[nbsp]]facilitate[[nbsp]]a[[nbsp]]more[[nbsp]]comprehensive[[nbsp]]learning[[nbsp]]experience[[nbsp]]for[[nbsp]]students[[nbsp]]who[[nbsp]]have[[nbsp]]been[[nbsp]]referred[[nbsp]]for[[nbsp]]misconduct.[[nbsp]]Responsibilities[[nbsp]]and[[nbsp]]duties[[nbsp]]of[[nbsp]]CJB[[nbsp]]students[[nbsp]]have[[nbsp]]been[[nbsp]]known[[nbsp]]to[[nbsp]]vary,[[nbsp]]as[[nbsp]]well.	+ CJB can also refer to simply the (12) student members, as they will meet and work together to conduct campus outreach programs in order to promote academic and social integrity amongst students. Other responsibilities of CJB students include serving as advisors or advocates for students or faculty who are going into formal hearings (for contested misconduct). CJB students also conduct follow-up meetings with students who have been through the informal disciplinary process to obtain valuable assessment information, as well as help facilitate a more comprehensive learning experience for students who have been referred for misconduct. Responsibilities and duties of CJB students have been known to vary, as well.
Line 12:	Line 12:
- Typically,[[nbsp]]Campus[[nbsp]]Judicial[[nbsp]]Board[[nbsp]]hearings[[nbsp]]will[[nbsp]]be[[nbsp]]heard[[nbsp]]by[[nbsp]]a[[nbsp]]panel[[nbsp]]consisting[[nbsp]]of[[nbsp]]2[[nbsp]]student[[nbsp]]members[[nbsp]]and[[nbsp]]1[[nbsp]]faculty[[nbsp]]member.[[nbsp]]One[[nbsp]]of[[nbsp]]the[[nbsp]]student[[nbsp]]members[[nbsp]]chairs[[nbsp]]the[[nbsp]]formal[[nbsp]]hearing.[[nbsp]]For[[nbsp]]more[[nbsp]]serious[[nbsp]]violations,[[nbsp]]hearings[[nbsp]]are[[nbsp]]brought[[nbsp]]before[[nbsp]]the[[nbsp]]["Student Conduct Committee" Student_Conduct_Committee],[[nbsp]]which[[nbsp]]is[[nbsp]]a[[nbsp]]body[[nbsp]]that[[nbsp]]has[[nbsp]]a[[nbsp]]slightly[[nbsp]]different[[nbsp]]mandate[[nbsp]](and[[nbsp]]thus[[nbsp]]extended[[nbsp]]powers,[[nbsp]]such[[nbsp]]as[[nbsp]]dismissal[[nbsp]]and[[nbsp]]suspension).[[nbsp]]However,[[nbsp]]students[[nbsp]]who[[nbsp]]are[[nbsp]]appointed[[nbsp]]to[[nbsp]]CJB[[nbsp]]also[[nbsp]]receive[[nbsp]]a[[nbsp]]co-appointment[[nbsp]]to[[nbsp]]the[[nbsp]]SCC.[[nbsp]]One[[nbsp]]of[[nbsp]]the[[nbsp]]other[[nbsp]]ways[[nbsp]]["Student Conduct Committee" Student_Conduct_Committee][[nbsp]]hearings[[nbsp]]differ[[nbsp]]from[[nbsp]]CJB[[nbsp]]hearings[[nbsp]]is[[nbsp]]that[[nbsp]]they[[nbsp]]typically[[nbsp]](but[[nbsp]]not[[nbsp]]always)[[nbsp]]have[[nbsp]]a[[nbsp]]faculty[[nbsp]]majority[[nbsp]](2)[[nbsp]]and[[nbsp]]student[[nbsp]]minority[[nbsp]](1).[[nbsp]]SCC[[nbsp]]Hearings[[nbsp]]are[[nbsp]]chaired[[nbsp]]by[[nbsp]]a[[nbsp]]faculty[[nbsp]]member[[nbsp]]as[[nbsp]]well,[[nbsp]]usually[[nbsp]]a[[nbsp]]faculty[[nbsp]]member[[nbsp]]from[[nbsp]]the[[nbsp]]UC[[nbsp]]Davis[[nbsp]]Law[[nbsp]]School[[nbsp]](["King Hall" King_Hall]).	+ Typically, Campus Judicial Board hearings will be heard by a panel consisting of 2 student members and 1 faculty member. One of the student members chairs the formal hearing. For more serious violations, hearings are brought before the ["Student Conduct Committee"], which is a body that has a slightly different mandate (and thus extended powers, such as dismissal and suspension). However, students who are appointed to CJB also receive a co-appointment to the SCC. One of the other ways ["Student Conduct Committee"] hearings differ from CJB hearings is that they typically (but not always) have a faculty majority (2) and student minority (1). SCC Hearings are chaired by a faculty member as well, usually a faculty member from the UC Davis Law School (["King Hall"]).
Line 14:	Line 14:
- As[[nbsp]]of[[nbsp]]a[[nbsp]]few[[nbsp]]years[[nbsp]]ago,[[nbsp]]["ASUCD" ASUCD][[nbsp]]amended[[nbsp]]its[[nbsp]]Government[[nbsp]]Codes[[nbsp]]to[[nbsp]]include[[nbsp]]the[[nbsp]]Campus[[nbsp]]Judicial[[nbsp]]Board[[nbsp]]in[[nbsp]]its[[nbsp]]procedures.[[nbsp]]Complaints[[nbsp]]against[[nbsp]]the[[nbsp]]["Elections Committee" Elections_Committee],[[nbsp]]for[[nbsp]]example,[[nbsp]]are[[nbsp]]to[[nbsp]]be[[nbsp]]brought[[nbsp]]before[[nbsp]]the[[nbsp]]Campus[[nbsp]]Judicial[[nbsp]]Board.[[nbsp]]In[[nbsp]]recent[[nbsp]]years,[[nbsp]]this[[nbsp]]has[[nbsp]]happened[[nbsp]]on[[nbsp]]a[[nbsp]]few[[nbsp]]occasions:[[nbsp]]the[[nbsp]]so-called[[nbsp]]["Election Statement Controversy" Election_Statement_Controversy],[[nbsp]]as[[nbsp]]well[[nbsp]]as[[nbsp]]an[[nbsp]]issue[[nbsp]]regarding[[nbsp]]the[[nbsp]]["Move to Division I" Move_to_Division_I][[nbsp]]in[[nbsp]]Winter[[nbsp]]2002.	+ As of a few years ago, ["ASUCD"] amended its Government Codes to include the Campus Judicial Board in its procedures. Complaints against the ["Elections Committee"], for example, are to be brought before the Campus Judicial Board. In recent years, this has happened on a few occasions: the so-called ["Election Statement Controversy"], as well as an issue regarding the ["Move to Division I"] in Winter 2002.
Line 17:	Line 17:
- While[[nbsp]]the[[nbsp]]roster[[nbsp]]on[[nbsp]]the[[nbsp]]website[[nbsp]]is[[nbsp]]outdated,[[nbsp]]the[[nbsp]]current[[nbsp]](2004-2005)[[nbsp]]student[[nbsp]]members[[nbsp]]of[[nbsp]]the[[nbsp]]Campus[[nbsp]]Judicial[[nbsp]]Board[[nbsp]]are: - [[nbsp]][[nbsp]]["ElvinLee" Elvin_Lee],[[nbsp]]co-Chair - [[nbsp]][[nbsp]]Michael[[nbsp]]Fein,[[nbsp]]co-Chair - [[nbsp]][[nbsp]]Daniel[[nbsp]]Braunschweig - [[nbsp]][[nbsp]]Dana[[nbsp]]Davies-Shawhyde - [[nbsp]][[nbsp]]Dirk[[nbsp]]Daza - [[nbsp]][[nbsp]]Leona[[nbsp]]Dondi - [[nbsp]][[nbsp]]Jennifer[[nbsp]]Frost - [[nbsp]][[nbsp]]Carla[[nbsp]]Hernandez - [[nbsp]][[nbsp]]Oliver[[nbsp]]Hsu - [[nbsp]][[nbsp]]Dustin[[nbsp]]Ingraham - [[nbsp]][[nbsp]]Venessa[[nbsp]]Laurel - [[nbsp]][[nbsp]]Eimi[[nbsp]]Stokes	+ While the roster on the website is outdated, the current (2004-2005) student members of the Campus Judicial Board are: + * ["ElvinLee" Elvin Lee], co-Chair + * Michael Fein, co-Chair + * Daniel Braunschweig + * Dana Davies-Shawhyde + * Dirk Daza + * Leona Dondi + * Jennifer Frost + * Carla Hernandez + * Oliver Hsu + * Dustin Ingraham + * Venessa Laurel + * Eimi Stokes
Line 32:	Line 32:
- ...[[nbsp]]Too[[nbsp]]much[[nbsp]]to[[nbsp]]say[[nbsp]]here.[[nbsp]]I'll[[nbsp]]save[[nbsp]]this[[nbsp]]for[[nbsp]]another[[nbsp]]time.[[nbsp]]The[[nbsp]]one[[nbsp]]thing[[nbsp]]I[[nbsp]]will[[nbsp]]for[[nbsp]]now[[nbsp]]is[[nbsp]]that[[nbsp]]the[[nbsp]]Campus[[nbsp]]Judicial[[nbsp]]Board[[nbsp]]has[[nbsp]]existed[[nbsp]]longer[[nbsp]]than[[nbsp]]Student[[nbsp]]Judicial[[nbsp]]Affairs[[nbsp]]has[[nbsp]]at[[nbsp]]UC[[nbsp]]Davis.	+ ... Too much to say here. I'll save this for another time. The one thing I will for now is that the Campus Judicial Board has existed longer than Student Judicial Affairs has at UC Davis.
Line 35:	Line 35:
- \|\|3200[[nbsp]]Dutton[[nbsp]]Hall\|\|	+ \|\|3200 Dutton Hall\|\|
Line 37:	Line 37:
- \|\|9am-12noon,[[nbsp]]1pm-4:30pm\|\|	+ \|\|9am-12noon, 1pm-4:30pm\|\|

Campus Judicial Board

RobertMorris — 2005-03-22 09:58:35

All Rights Reversed

Differences for Campus Judicial Board

Deletions are marked with - .	Additions are marked with +.
Line 7:	Line 7:
- The UC Davis Campus Judicial Board, or CJB for short, is a University body which has the primary responsibility of hearing and deciding cases of contested student misconduct. CJB "proper" usually consists of 12 student members and 4 faculty members. The student members are appointed under the authority of the Vice Chancellor of ["Student Affairs"], but are typically selected through an interview and recruitment process conducted by the current/outgoing student members and the CJB Staff Advisor (who is an SJA officer). The faculty members of the Board are appointed by the ["Academic Senate"] and serve on the Board for 2 year periods (IIRC). Because their mission and purpose is closely related to the duties of the Office of ["Student Judicial Affairs"], the two groups often work side-by-side. The students of the Campus Judicial Board work out of the Office of ["Student Judicial Affairs"] in ["Dutton Hall"]	+ The[[nbsp]]UC[[nbsp]]Davis[[nbsp]]Campus[[nbsp]]Judicial[[nbsp]]Board,[[nbsp]]or[[nbsp]]CJB[[nbsp]]for[[nbsp]]short,[[nbsp]]is[[nbsp]]a[[nbsp]]University[[nbsp]]body[[nbsp]]which[[nbsp]]has[[nbsp]]the[[nbsp]]primary[[nbsp]]responsibility[[nbsp]]of[[nbsp]]hearing[[nbsp]]and[[nbsp]]deciding[[nbsp]]cases[[nbsp]]of[[nbsp]]contested[[nbsp]]student[[nbsp]]misconduct.[[nbsp]]CJB[[nbsp]]"proper"[[nbsp]]usually[[nbsp]]consists[[nbsp]]of[[nbsp]]12[[nbsp]]student[[nbsp]]members[[nbsp]]and[[nbsp]]4[[nbsp]]faculty[[nbsp]]members.[[nbsp]]The[[nbsp]]student[[nbsp]]members[[nbsp]]are[[nbsp]]appointed[[nbsp]]under[[nbsp]]the[[nbsp]]authority[[nbsp]]of[[nbsp]]the[[nbsp]]Vice[[nbsp]]Chancellor[[nbsp]]of[[nbsp]]["Student Affairs" Student_Affairs],[[nbsp]]but[[nbsp]]are[[nbsp]]typically[[nbsp]]selected[[nbsp]]through[[nbsp]]an[[nbsp]]interview[[nbsp]]and[[nbsp]]recruitment[[nbsp]]process[[nbsp]]conducted[[nbsp]]by[[nbsp]]the[[nbsp]]current/outgoing[[nbsp]]student[[nbsp]]members[[nbsp]]and[[nbsp]]the[[nbsp]]CJB[[nbsp]]Staff[[nbsp]]Advisor[[nbsp]](who[[nbsp]]is[[nbsp]]an[[nbsp]]SJA[[nbsp]]officer).[[nbsp]]The[[nbsp]]faculty[[nbsp]]members[[nbsp]]of[[nbsp]]the[[nbsp]]Board[[nbsp]]are[[nbsp]]appointed[[nbsp]]by[[nbsp]]the[[nbsp]]["Academic Senate" Academic_Senate][[nbsp]]and[[nbsp]]serve[[nbsp]]on[[nbsp]]the[[nbsp]]Board[[nbsp]]for[[nbsp]]2[[nbsp]]year[[nbsp]]periods[[nbsp]](IIRC).[[nbsp]]Because[[nbsp]]their[[nbsp]]mission[[nbsp]]and[[nbsp]]purpose[[nbsp]]is[[nbsp]]closely[[nbsp]]related[[nbsp]]to[[nbsp]]the[[nbsp]]duties[[nbsp]]of[[nbsp]]the[[nbsp]]Office[[nbsp]]of[[nbsp]]["Student Judicial Affairs" Student_Judicial_Affairs],[[nbsp]]the[[nbsp]]two[[nbsp]]groups[[nbsp]]often[[nbsp]]work[[nbsp]]side-by-side.[[nbsp]]The[[nbsp]]students[[nbsp]]of[[nbsp]]the[[nbsp]]Campus[[nbsp]]Judicial[[nbsp]]Board[[nbsp]]work[[nbsp]]out[[nbsp]]of[[nbsp]]the[[nbsp]]Office[[nbsp]]of[[nbsp]]["Student Judicial Affairs" Student_Judicial_Affairs][[nbsp]]in[[nbsp]]["Dutton Hall" Dutton_Hall]
Line 10:	Line 10:
- CJB can also refer to simply the (12) student members, as they will meet and work together to conduct campus outreach programs in order to promote academic and social integrity amongst students. Other responsibilities of CJB students include serving as advisors or advocates for students or faculty who are going into formal hearings (for contested misconduct). CJB students also conduct follow-up meetings with students who have been through the informal disciplinary process to obtain valuable assessment information, as well as help facilitate a more comprehensive learning experience for students who have been referred for misconduct. Responsibilities and duties of CJB students have been known to vary, as well.	+ CJB[[nbsp]]can[[nbsp]]also[[nbsp]]refer[[nbsp]]to[[nbsp]]simply[[nbsp]]the[[nbsp]](12)[[nbsp]]student[[nbsp]]members,[[nbsp]]as[[nbsp]]they[[nbsp]]will[[nbsp]]meet[[nbsp]]and[[nbsp]]work[[nbsp]]together[[nbsp]]to[[nbsp]]conduct[[nbsp]]campus[[nbsp]]outreach[[nbsp]]programs[[nbsp]]in[[nbsp]]order[[nbsp]]to[[nbsp]]promote[[nbsp]]academic[[nbsp]]and[[nbsp]]social[[nbsp]]integrity[[nbsp]]amongst[[nbsp]]students.[[nbsp]]Other[[nbsp]]responsibilities[[nbsp]]of[[nbsp]]CJB[[nbsp]]students[[nbsp]]include[[nbsp]]serving[[nbsp]]as[[nbsp]]advisors[[nbsp]]or[[nbsp]]advocates[[nbsp]]for[[nbsp]]students[[nbsp]]or[[nbsp]]faculty[[nbsp]]who[[nbsp]]are[[nbsp]]going[[nbsp]]into[[nbsp]]formal[[nbsp]]hearings[[nbsp]](for[[nbsp]]contested[[nbsp]]misconduct).[[nbsp]]CJB[[nbsp]]students[[nbsp]]also[[nbsp]]conduct[[nbsp]]follow-up[[nbsp]]meetings[[nbsp]]with[[nbsp]]students[[nbsp]]who[[nbsp]]have[[nbsp]]been[[nbsp]]through[[nbsp]]the[[nbsp]]informal[[nbsp]]disciplinary[[nbsp]]process[[nbsp]]to[[nbsp]]obtain[[nbsp]]valuable[[nbsp]]assessment[[nbsp]]information,[[nbsp]]as[[nbsp]]well[[nbsp]]as[[nbsp]]help[[nbsp]]facilitate[[nbsp]]a[[nbsp]]more[[nbsp]]comprehensive[[nbsp]]learning[[nbsp]]experience[[nbsp]]for[[nbsp]]students[[nbsp]]who[[nbsp]]have[[nbsp]]been[[nbsp]]referred[[nbsp]]for[[nbsp]]misconduct.[[nbsp]]Responsibilities[[nbsp]]and[[nbsp]]duties[[nbsp]]of[[nbsp]]CJB[[nbsp]]students[[nbsp]]have[[nbsp]]been[[nbsp]]known[[nbsp]]to[[nbsp]]vary,[[nbsp]]as[[nbsp]]well.
Line 12:	Line 12:
- Typically, Campus Judicial Board hearings will be heard by a panel consisting of 2 student members and 1 faculty member. One of the student members chairs the formal hearing. For more serious violations, hearings are brought before the ["Student Conduct Committee"], which is a body that has a slightly different mandate (and thus extended powers, such as dismissal and suspension). However, students who are appointed to CJB also receive a co-appointment to the SCC. One of the other ways ["Student Conduct Committee"] hearings differ from CJB hearings is that they typically (but not always) have a faculty majority (2) and student minority (1). SCC Hearings are chaired by a faculty member as well, usually a faculty member from the UC Davis Law School (["King Hall"]).	+ Typically,[[nbsp]]Campus[[nbsp]]Judicial[[nbsp]]Board[[nbsp]]hearings[[nbsp]]will[[nbsp]]be[[nbsp]]heard[[nbsp]]by[[nbsp]]a[[nbsp]]panel[[nbsp]]consisting[[nbsp]]of[[nbsp]]2[[nbsp]]student[[nbsp]]members[[nbsp]]and[[nbsp]]1[[nbsp]]faculty[[nbsp]]member.[[nbsp]]One[[nbsp]]of[[nbsp]]the[[nbsp]]student[[nbsp]]members[[nbsp]]chairs[[nbsp]]the[[nbsp]]formal[[nbsp]]hearing.[[nbsp]]For[[nbsp]]more[[nbsp]]serious[[nbsp]]violations,[[nbsp]]hearings[[nbsp]]are[[nbsp]]brought[[nbsp]]before[[nbsp]]the[[nbsp]]["Student Conduct Committee" Student_Conduct_Committee],[[nbsp]]which[[nbsp]]is[[nbsp]]a[[nbsp]]body[[nbsp]]that[[nbsp]]has[[nbsp]]a[[nbsp]]slightly[[nbsp]]different[[nbsp]]mandate[[nbsp]](and[[nbsp]]thus[[nbsp]]extended[[nbsp]]powers,[[nbsp]]such[[nbsp]]as[[nbsp]]dismissal[[nbsp]]and[[nbsp]]suspension).[[nbsp]]However,[[nbsp]]students[[nbsp]]who[[nbsp]]are[[nbsp]]appointed[[nbsp]]to[[nbsp]]CJB[[nbsp]]also[[nbsp]]receive[[nbsp]]a[[nbsp]]co-appointment[[nbsp]]to[[nbsp]]the[[nbsp]]SCC.[[nbsp]]One[[nbsp]]of[[nbsp]]the[[nbsp]]other[[nbsp]]ways[[nbsp]]["Student Conduct Committee" Student_Conduct_Committee][[nbsp]]hearings[[nbsp]]differ[[nbsp]]from[[nbsp]]CJB[[nbsp]]hearings[[nbsp]]is[[nbsp]]that[[nbsp]]they[[nbsp]]typically[[nbsp]](but[[nbsp]]not[[nbsp]]always)[[nbsp]]have[[nbsp]]a[[nbsp]]faculty[[nbsp]]majority[[nbsp]](2)[[nbsp]]and[[nbsp]]student[[nbsp]]minority[[nbsp]](1).[[nbsp]]SCC[[nbsp]]Hearings[[nbsp]]are[[nbsp]]chaired[[nbsp]]by[[nbsp]]a[[nbsp]]faculty[[nbsp]]member[[nbsp]]as[[nbsp]]well,[[nbsp]]usually[[nbsp]]a[[nbsp]]faculty[[nbsp]]member[[nbsp]]from[[nbsp]]the[[nbsp]]UC[[nbsp]]Davis[[nbsp]]Law[[nbsp]]School[[nbsp]](["King Hall" King_Hall]).
Line 14:	Line 14:
- As of a few years ago, ["ASUCD"] amended its Government Codes to include the Campus Judicial Board in its procedures. Complaints against the ["Elections Committee"], for example, are to be brought before the Campus Judicial Board. In recent years, this has happened on a few occasions: the so-called ["Election Statement Controversy"], as well as an issue regarding the ["Move to Division I"] in Winter 2002.	+ As[[nbsp]]of[[nbsp]]a[[nbsp]]few[[nbsp]]years[[nbsp]]ago,[[nbsp]]["ASUCD" ASUCD][[nbsp]]amended[[nbsp]]its[[nbsp]]Government[[nbsp]]Codes[[nbsp]]to[[nbsp]]include[[nbsp]]the[[nbsp]]Campus[[nbsp]]Judicial[[nbsp]]Board[[nbsp]]in[[nbsp]]its[[nbsp]]procedures.[[nbsp]]Complaints[[nbsp]]against[[nbsp]]the[[nbsp]]["Elections Committee" Elections_Committee],[[nbsp]]for[[nbsp]]example,[[nbsp]]are[[nbsp]]to[[nbsp]]be[[nbsp]]brought[[nbsp]]before[[nbsp]]the[[nbsp]]Campus[[nbsp]]Judicial[[nbsp]]Board.[[nbsp]]In[[nbsp]]recent[[nbsp]]years,[[nbsp]]this[[nbsp]]has[[nbsp]]happened[[nbsp]]on[[nbsp]]a[[nbsp]]few[[nbsp]]occasions:[[nbsp]]the[[nbsp]]so-called[[nbsp]]["Election Statement Controversy" Election_Statement_Controversy],[[nbsp]]as[[nbsp]]well[[nbsp]]as[[nbsp]]an[[nbsp]]issue[[nbsp]]regarding[[nbsp]]the[[nbsp]]["Move to Division I" Move_to_Division_I][[nbsp]]in[[nbsp]]Winter[[nbsp]]2002.
Line 17:	Line 17:
- While the roster on the website is outdated, the current (2004-2005) student members of the Campus Judicial Board are: - * ["ElvinLee" Elvin Lee], co-Chair - * Michael Fein, co-Chair - * Daniel Braunschweig - * Dana Davies-Shawhyde - * Dirk Daza - * Leona Dondi - * Jennifer Frost - * Carla Hernandez - * Oliver Hsu - * Dustin Ingraham - * Venessa Laurel - * Eimi Stokes	+ While[[nbsp]]the[[nbsp]]roster[[nbsp]]on[[nbsp]]the[[nbsp]]website[[nbsp]]is[[nbsp]]outdated,[[nbsp]]the[[nbsp]]current[[nbsp]](2004-2005)[[nbsp]]student[[nbsp]]members[[nbsp]]of[[nbsp]]the[[nbsp]]Campus[[nbsp]]Judicial[[nbsp]]Board[[nbsp]]are: + [[nbsp]][[nbsp]]["ElvinLee" Elvin_Lee],[[nbsp]]co-Chair + [[nbsp]][[nbsp]]Michael[[nbsp]]Fein,[[nbsp]]co-Chair + [[nbsp]][[nbsp]]Daniel[[nbsp]]Braunschweig + [[nbsp]][[nbsp]]Dana[[nbsp]]Davies-Shawhyde + [[nbsp]][[nbsp]]Dirk[[nbsp]]Daza + [[nbsp]][[nbsp]]Leona[[nbsp]]Dondi + [[nbsp]][[nbsp]]Jennifer[[nbsp]]Frost + [[nbsp]][[nbsp]]Carla[[nbsp]]Hernandez + [[nbsp]][[nbsp]]Oliver[[nbsp]]Hsu + [[nbsp]][[nbsp]]Dustin[[nbsp]]Ingraham + [[nbsp]][[nbsp]]Venessa[[nbsp]]Laurel + [[nbsp]][[nbsp]]Eimi[[nbsp]]Stokes
Line 32:	Line 32:
- ... Too much to say here. I'll save this for another time. The one thing I will for now is that the Campus Judicial Board has existed longer than Student Judicial Affairs has at UC Davis.	+ ...[[nbsp]]Too[[nbsp]]much[[nbsp]]to[[nbsp]]say[[nbsp]]here.[[nbsp]]I'll[[nbsp]]save[[nbsp]]this[[nbsp]]for[[nbsp]]another[[nbsp]]time.[[nbsp]]The[[nbsp]]one[[nbsp]]thing[[nbsp]]I[[nbsp]]will[[nbsp]]for[[nbsp]]now[[nbsp]]is[[nbsp]]that[[nbsp]]the[[nbsp]]Campus[[nbsp]]Judicial[[nbsp]]Board[[nbsp]]has[[nbsp]]existed[[nbsp]]longer[[nbsp]]than[[nbsp]]Student[[nbsp]]Judicial[[nbsp]]Affairs[[nbsp]]has[[nbsp]]at[[nbsp]]UC[[nbsp]]Davis.
Line 35:	Line 35:
- \|\|3200 Dutton Hall\|\|	+ \|\|3200[[nbsp]]Dutton[[nbsp]]Hall\|\|
Line 37:	Line 37:
- \|\|9am-12noon, 1pm-4:30pm\|\|	+ \|\|9am-12noon,[[nbsp]]1pm-4:30pm\|\|

Campus Judicial Board

ElvinLee — 2005-03-19 13:53:10

board member resigned.

Differences for Campus Judicial Board

Deletions are marked with - .	Additions are marked with +.
Line 29:	Line 29:
- * Kalie Moody

Campus Judicial Board

ElvinLee — 2005-03-19 13:52:40

vice chancellor of *student affairs*. SJA does not have a vice chancellor. liu.

Differences for Campus Judicial Board

Deletions are marked with - .	Additions are marked with +.
Line 7:	Line 7:
- The UC Davis Campus Judicial Board, or CJB for short, is a University body which has the primary responsibility of hearing and deciding cases of contested student misconduct. CJB "proper" usually consists of 12 student members and 4 faculty members. The student members are appointed under the authority of the Vice Chancellor of ["Student Judicial Affairs"], but are typically selected through an interview and recruitment process conducted by the current/outgoing student members and the CJB Staff Advisor (who is an SJA officer). The faculty members of the Board are appointed by the ["Academic Senate"] and serve on the Board for 2 year periods (IIRC). Because their mission and purpose is closely related to the duties of the Office of ["Student Judicial Affairs"], the two groups often work side-by-side. The students of the Campus Judicial Board work out of the Office of ["Student Judicial Affairs"] in ["Dutton Hall"]	+ The UC Davis Campus Judicial Board, or CJB for short, is a University body which has the primary responsibility of hearing and deciding cases of contested student misconduct. CJB "proper" usually consists of 12 student members and 4 faculty members. The student members are appointed under the authority of the Vice Chancellor of ["Student Affairs"], but are typically selected through an interview and recruitment process conducted by the current/outgoing student members and the CJB Staff Advisor (who is an SJA officer). The faculty members of the Board are appointed by the ["Academic Senate"] and serve on the Board for 2 year periods (IIRC). Because their mission and purpose is closely related to the duties of the Office of ["Student Judicial Affairs"], the two groups often work side-by-side. The students of the Campus Judicial Board work out of the Office of ["Student Judicial Affairs"] in ["Dutton Hall"]

Campus Judicial Board

ElvinLee — 2005-03-19 13:50:43

faculty members are very much appointed by the *academic* senate, not asucd

Differences for Campus Judicial Board

Deletions are marked with - .	Additions are marked with +.
Line 7:	Line 7:
- The UC Davis Campus Judicial Board, or CJB for short, is a University body which has the primary responsibility of hearing and deciding cases of contested student misconduct. CJB "proper" usually consists of 12 student members and 4 faculty members. The student members are appointed under the authority of the Vice Chancellor of ["Student Judicial Affairs"], but are typically selected through an interview and recruitment process conducted by the current/outgoing student members and the CJB Staff Advisor (who is an SJA officer). The faculty members of the Board are appointed by the ["Senate" ASUCD Senate] and serve on the Board for 2 year periods (IIRC). Because their mission and purpose is closely related to the duties of the Office of ["Student Judicial Affairs"], the two groups often work side-by-side. The students of the Campus Judicial Board work out of the Office of ["Student Judicial Affairs"] in ["Dutton Hall"]	+ The UC Davis Campus Judicial Board, or CJB for short, is a University body which has the primary responsibility of hearing and deciding cases of contested student misconduct. CJB "proper" usually consists of 12 student members and 4 faculty members. The student members are appointed under the authority of the Vice Chancellor of ["Student Judicial Affairs"], but are typically selected through an interview and recruitment process conducted by the current/outgoing student members and the CJB Staff Advisor (who is an SJA officer). The faculty members of the Board are appointed by the ["Academic Senate"] and serve on the Board for 2 year periods (IIRC). Because their mission and purpose is closely related to the duties of the Office of ["Student Judicial Affairs"], the two groups often work side-by-side. The students of the Campus Judicial Board work out of the Office of ["Student Judicial Affairs"] in ["Dutton Hall"]

Campus Judicial Board

AmeliaCarlson — 2005-03-07 12:50:39

fixed link

Differences for Campus Judicial Board

Deletions are marked with - .	Additions are marked with +.
Line 7:	Line 7:
- The UC Davis Campus Judicial Board, or CJB for short, is a University body which has the primary responsibility of hearing and deciding cases of contested student misconduct. CJB "proper" usually consists of 12 student members and 4 faculty members. The student members are appointed under the authority of the Vice Chancellor of ["Student Judicial Affairs"], but are typically selected through an interview and recruitment process conducted by the current/outgoing student members and the CJB Staff Advisor (who is an SJA officer). The faculty members of the Board are appointed by the ["ASUCD Senate"] and serve on the Board for 2 year periods (IIRC). Because their mission and purpose is closely related to the duties of the Office of ["Student Judicial Affairs"], the two groups often work side-by-side. The students of the Campus Judicial Board work out of the Office of ["Student Judicial Affairs"] in ["Dutton Hall"]	+ The UC Davis Campus Judicial Board, or CJB for short, is a University body which has the primary responsibility of hearing and deciding cases of contested student misconduct. CJB "proper" usually consists of 12 student members and 4 faculty members. The student members are appointed under the authority of the Vice Chancellor of ["Student Judicial Affairs"], but are typically selected through an interview and recruitment process conducted by the current/outgoing student members and the CJB Staff Advisor (who is an SJA officer). The faculty members of the Board are appointed by the ["Senate" ASUCD Senate] and serve on the Board for 2 year periods (IIRC). Because their mission and purpose is closely related to the duties of the Office of ["Student Judicial Affairs"], the two groups often work side-by-side. The students of the Campus Judicial Board work out of the Office of ["Student Judicial Affairs"] in ["Dutton Hall"]
Line 10:	Line 10:
- CJB can also refer to simply the (12) student members, as they will meet and work together to conduct campus outreach programs in order to promote academic and social integrity amongst students. Other responsibilities of CJB students include serving as advisors or advocates for students or faculty who are going into formal hearings (for contested misconduct). CJB students also conduct follow-up meetings with students who have been through the informal disciplinary process to obtain valuable assessment information, as well as help faciliate a more comprehensive learning experience for students who have been referred for misconduct. Responsibilities and duties of CJB students have been known to vary, as well.	+ CJB can also refer to simply the (12) student members, as they will meet and work together to conduct campus outreach programs in order to promote academic and social integrity amongst students. Other responsibilities of CJB students include serving as advisors or advocates for students or faculty who are going into formal hearings (for contested misconduct). CJB students also conduct follow-up meetings with students who have been through the informal disciplinary process to obtain valuable assessment information, as well as help facilitate a more comprehensive learning experience for students who have been referred for misconduct. Responsibilities and duties of CJB students have been known to vary, as well.

Campus Judicial Board

EricTalevich — 2005-02-28 19:31:48

Move to D-I != FACE initiative

Differences for Campus Judicial Board

Deletions are marked with - .	Additions are marked with +.
Line 14:	Line 14:
- As of a few years ago, ["ASUCD"] amended its Government Codes to include the Campus Judicial Board in its procedures. Complaints against the ["Elections Committee"], for example, are to be brought before the Campus Judicial Board. In recent years, this has happened on a few occasions: the so-called ["Election Statement Controversy"], as well as an issue regarding the ["FACE Initiative"] in Winter 2002.	+ As of a few years ago, ["ASUCD"] amended its Government Codes to include the Campus Judicial Board in its procedures. Complaints against the ["Elections Committee"], for example, are to be brought before the Campus Judicial Board. In recent years, this has happened on a few occasions: the so-called ["Election Statement Controversy"], as well as an issue regarding the ["Move to Division I"] in Winter 2002.

Campus Judicial Board

EricTalevich — 2005-02-28 18:14:43

Some links. FACE initiative?

Differences for Campus Judicial Board

Deletions are marked with - .	Additions are marked with +.
Line 7:	Line 7:
- The UC Davis Campus Judicial Board, or CJB for short, is a University body which has the primary responsibility of hearing and deciding cases of contested student misconduct. CJB "proper" usually consists of 12 student members and 4 faculty members. The student members are appointed under the authority of the Vice Chancellor of ["Student Affairs"], but are typically selected through an interview and recruitment process conducted by the current/outgoing student members and the CJB Staff Advisor (who is an SJA officer). The faculty members of the Board are appointed by the ["Academic Senate"] and serve on the Board for 2 year periods (IIRC). Because their mission and purpose is closely related to the duties of the Office of ["Student Judicial Affairs"], the two groups often work side-by-side. The students of the Campus Judicial Board work out of the Office of ["Student Judicial Affairs"] in ["Dutton Hall"]	+ The UC Davis Campus Judicial Board, or CJB for short, is a University body which has the primary responsibility of hearing and deciding cases of contested student misconduct. CJB "proper" usually consists of 12 student members and 4 faculty members. The student members are appointed under the authority of the Vice Chancellor of ["Student Judicial Affairs"], but are typically selected through an interview and recruitment process conducted by the current/outgoing student members and the CJB Staff Advisor (who is an SJA officer). The faculty members of the Board are appointed by the ["ASUCD Senate"] and serve on the Board for 2 year periods (IIRC). Because their mission and purpose is closely related to the duties of the Office of ["Student Judicial Affairs"], the two groups often work side-by-side. The students of the Campus Judicial Board work out of the Office of ["Student Judicial Affairs"] in ["Dutton Hall"]
Line 14:	Line 14:
- As of a few years ago, ["ASUCD"] ammended its Government Codes to include the Campus Judicial Board in its procedures. Complaints against the ["Elections Committee"], for example, are to be brought before the Campus Judicial Board. In recent years, this has happened on a few occasions: the so-called ["Election Statement Controversy"], as well as an issue regarding the ["Move to D1"] referendum in Winter 2002.	+ As of a few years ago, ["ASUCD"] amended its Government Codes to include the Campus Judicial Board in its procedures. Complaints against the ["Elections Committee"], for example, are to be brought before the Campus Judicial Board. In recent years, this has happened on a few occasions: the so-called ["Election Statement Controversy"], as well as an issue regarding the ["FACE Initiative"] in Winter 2002.

Campus Judicial Board

ElvinLee — 2005-01-08 19:53:49

Differences for Campus Judicial Board

Deletions are marked with - .	Additions are marked with +.
Line 44:	Line 44:
	+ [[Comments]]

Campus Judicial Board

ElvinLee — 2005-01-08 08:26:50

Differences for Campus Judicial Board

Deletions are marked with - .	Additions are marked with +.
Line 1:	Line 1:
	+ attachment:cjb.jpg + +
Line 31:	Line 34:
-	+ -----

Campus Judicial Board

ElvinLee — 2005-01-08 08:26:25

Upload of image cjb.jpg.

Campus Judicial Board

ElvinLee — 2005-01-08 08:22:34

Differences for Campus Judicial Board

Deletions are marked with - .	Additions are marked with +.
Line 1:	Line 1:
	+ [[TableOfContents]] + + = Introduction = + The UC Davis Campus Judicial Board, or CJB for short, is a University body which has the primary responsibility of hearing and deciding cases of contested student misconduct. CJB "proper" usually consists of 12 student members and 4 faculty members. The student members are appointed under the authority of the Vice Chancellor of ["Student Affairs"], but are typically selected through an interview and recruitment process conducted by the current/outgoing student members and the CJB Staff Advisor (who is an SJA officer). The faculty members of the Board are appointed by the ["Academic Senate"] and serve on the Board for 2 year periods (IIRC). Because their mission and purpose is closely related to the duties of the Office of ["Student Judicial Affairs"], the two groups often work side-by-side. The students of the Campus Judicial Board work out of the Office of ["Student Judicial Affairs"] in ["Dutton Hall"] + + = Duties = + CJB can also refer to simply the (12) student members, as they will meet and work together to conduct campus outreach programs in order to promote academic and social integrity amongst students. Other responsibilities of CJB students include serving as advisors or advocates for students or faculty who are going into formal hearings (for contested misconduct). CJB students also conduct follow-up meetings with students who have been through the informal disciplinary process to obtain valuable assessment information, as well as help faciliate a more comprehensive learning experience for students who have been referred for misconduct. Responsibilities and duties of CJB students have been known to vary, as well. + + Typically, Campus Judicial Board hearings will be heard by a panel consisting of 2 student members and 1 faculty member. One of the student members chairs the formal hearing. For more serious violations, hearings are brought before the ["Student Conduct Committee"], which is a body that has a slightly different mandate (and thus extended powers, such as dismissal and suspension). However, students who are appointed to CJB also receive a co-appointment to the SCC. One of the other ways ["Student Conduct Committee"] hearings differ from CJB hearings is that they typically (but not always) have a faculty majority (2) and student minority (1). SCC Hearings are chaired by a faculty member as well, usually a faculty member from the UC Davis Law School (["King Hall"]). + + As of a few years ago, ["ASUCD"] ammended its Government Codes to include the Campus Judicial Board in its procedures. Complaints against the ["Elections Committee"], for example, are to be brought before the Campus Judicial Board. In recent years, this has happened on a few occasions: the so-called ["Election Statement Controversy"], as well as an issue regarding the ["Move to D1"] referendum in Winter 2002. + + = Membership = + While the roster on the website is outdated, the current (2004-2005) student members of the Campus Judicial Board are: + * ["ElvinLee" Elvin Lee], co-Chair + * Michael Fein, co-Chair + * Daniel Braunschweig + * Dana Davies-Shawhyde + * Dirk Daza + * Leona Dondi + * Jennifer Frost + * Carla Hernandez + * Oliver Hsu + * Dustin Ingraham + * Venessa Laurel + * Kalie Moody + * Eimi Stokes + + = History = + ... Too much to say here. I'll save this for another time. The one thing I will for now is that the Campus Judicial Board has existed longer than Student Judicial Affairs has at UC Davis. + + \|\|<bgcolor='#E0E0FF'>'''Location'''\|\| + \|\|3200 Dutton Hall\|\| + \|\|<bgcolor='#E0E0FF'>'''Hours'''\|\| + \|\|9am-12noon, 1pm-4:30pm\|\| + \|\|<bgcolor='#E0E0FF'>'''Phone'''\|\| + \|\|(530)752-1128\|\| + \|\|<bgcolor='#E0E0FF'>'''Website'''\|\| + \|\|[http://sja.ucdavis.edu/cjb.htm]\|\| +