Recent Changes for "Christian Democratic Party" - Davis Wiki

Christian Democratic Party

JabberWokky — 2008-11-21 09:21:22

Differences for Christian Democratic Party

Deletions are marked with - .	Additions are marked with +.
Line 12:	Line 12:
- The '''Christian Democratic Party''', formerly the Christian Slate, was a UC Davis SPAC-registered political club that only had two active, known members, ["Steve Ostrowski"] and ["Ronald Payne"]. Its primary member was ["Steve Ostrowski"]. Total group membership was considered basically just ["Steve Ostrowski"] and a friend or two (although this is debated by Steve, who claims there's a larger "unknown" membership), although at one point the group did contain 5 people who signed as "Officers" in order to register with ["SPAC"]. They consisted of Steve Ostrowski, ["Ronald Payne"], and three others who decline to publically affiliate themselves with the group. Most people don't think the officers were or are still actively involved with this group.	+ The '''Christian Democratic Party''', formerly the ["Christian Slate"], was a ["UC Davis"] ["SPAC"]-registered ["student organizations" political club] that only had two active, known members, ["Steve Ostrowski"] and ["Ronald Payne"]. Its primary member was ["Steve Ostrowski"]. Total group membership was considered basically just ["Steve Ostrowski"] and a friend or two (although this is debated by Steve, who claims there's a larger "unknown" membership), although at one point the group did contain 5 people who signed as "Officers" in order to register with ["SPAC"]. They consisted of Steve Ostrowski, ["Ronald Payne"], and three others who decline to publically affiliate themselves with the group. Most people don't think the officers were or are still actively involved with this group.

Christian Democratic Party

JasonAller — 2008-09-27 13:30:19

link fixes

Differences for Christian Democratic Party

Deletions are marked with - .	Additions are marked with +.
Line 2:	Line 2:
	+
Line 56:	Line 57:
	+ + ''2006-11-08 23:55:12'' [[nbsp]] I didn't see anyone campaigning for yes on 85 anywhere in Davis...and Yolo county also rejected the amendment by a 25.6% margin --["Users/TylerFelix"]
Line 57:	Line 60:
- ''2006-11-08 23:55:12'' [[nbsp]] I didn't see anyone campaigning for yes on 85 anywhere in Davis...and Yolo county also rejected the amendment by a 25.6% margin --["TylerFelix"]	+ ''2007-02-24 00:57:59'' [[nbsp]] I'd like to see something more come out of this other than political nonsense... --["Users/CarlosOverstreet"]
Line 59:	Line 62:
- ''2007-02-24 00:57:59'' [[nbsp]] I'd like to see something more come out of this other than political nonsense... --["CarlosOverstreet"]	+ ''2007-02-25 22:15:58'' [[nbsp]] Oh man, sometimes coming back and reading the wiki really makes my day. Man! Selling cell phones. I never would have thought of that. --["Users/JillWeinstein"]
Line 61:	Line 64:
- ''2007-02-25 22:15:58'' [[nbsp]] Oh man, sometimes coming back and reading the wiki really makes my day. Man! Selling cell phones. I never would have thought of that. --["JillWeinstein"] - ------ - ''2007-03-02 14:44:37'' [[nbsp]] First off, you have a flag, that walks the line of copyright issues... all you did was delete off one portion of the cross and slap your group's title on the flag and claimed it as yours. The campaigning was close to nill for the aforementioned propositions and until I was actually voting, I didn't see anything before (exluding internet sources) to show that this party existed or even fielded candidates. --["CarlosOverstreet"]	+ ''2007-03-02 14:44:37'' [[nbsp]] First off, you have a flag, that walks the line of copyright issues... all you did was delete off one portion of the cross and slap your group's title on the flag and claimed it as yours. The campaigning was close to nill for the aforementioned propositions and until I was actually voting, I didn't see anything before (exluding internet sources) to show that this party existed or even fielded candidates. --["Users/CarlosOverstreet"]
Line 66:	Line 67:
- * There was a CDP Boat Party. -["GregWebb"]	+ * There was a CDP Boat Party. -["Users/GregWebb"]

Christian Democratic Party

JoseBleckman — 2008-02-27 21:29:35

Ron should have updated this ages ago

Differences for Christian Democratic Party

Deletions are marked with - .	Additions are marked with +.
Line 9:	Line 9:
- \|\|["Steve Ostrowski"]\|\|	+ \|\|["Ronald Payne"]\|\|
Line 43:	Line 43:
	+ =Winter Election Results 2008= + + Although ["Users/JoseBleckman" Joseph Bleckman] did not win the ASUCD Presidential Election, following CDP's endorsement of him he received over 500 votes. +
Line 44:	Line 48:
	+ + CDP is currently working with Solidarity to regroup before the Fall Elections, what with the Winter 2008 election effectively hitting the reboot button on the past two years of ASUCD. What's old is new again!

Christian Democratic Party

PxlAted — 2007-10-04 13:34:39

(quick edit)

Differences for Christian Democratic Party

Deletions are marked with - .	Additions are marked with +.
Line 62:	Line 62:
- ''2007-10-04 14:33:49'' [[nbsp]] the CDP flag is one of the worst combinations of ethnic nationalism and religion I have ever seen in a flag. if I didn't think the founder steve was for real it'd be funny. --["Users/PxlAted"]	+ ''2007-10-04 14:33:49'' [[nbsp]] the CDP flag is one of the worst combinations of ethnic nationalism and religion I have ever seen in a flag. if I didn't think steve was ernest, it'd be funny. --["Users/PxlAted"]

Christian Democratic Party

PxlAted — 2007-10-04 13:33:49

Comment added.

Differences for Christian Democratic Party

Deletions are marked with - .	Additions are marked with +.
Line 61:	Line 61:
	+ ------ + ''2007-10-04 14:33:49'' [[nbsp]] the CDP flag is one of the worst combinations of ethnic nationalism and religion I have ever seen in a flag. if I didn't think the founder steve was for real it'd be funny. --["Users/PxlAted"]

Christian Democratic Party

EdWins — 2007-10-04 11:39:13

(quick edit)

Differences for Christian Democratic Party

Deletions are marked with - .	Additions are marked with +.
Line 15:	Line 15:
- The mention of a political party with a partly religious agenda has drawn criticisms from those in the community, and a few out of towners, who feel this would be a blow to the separation between church and state. ["Steve Ostrowski"] feels that trying to rally a Christian constituency is no different from rallying any other sort of one - that even if religion is a touchy subject in the modern world. Additionally, some Christians have objected to the party as their platform doesn't reflect Christianity and they feel that the name of Christ is being exploited for political gain. However, some people also say that the CDP uses Christianity to support its non-Christian agenda. Other people say that the slate is just an attempt to gain attention by the Party Speaker.	+ The mention of a political party with a partly religious agenda has drawn criticisms from those in the community, and a few out of towners, who feel this would be a blow to the separation between church and state. ["Steve Ostrowski"] feels that trying to rally a Christian constituency is no different from rallying any other sort of one - that even if religion is a touchy subject in the modern world. Additionally, some Christians have objected to the party as their platform doesn't reflect Christianity and they feel that the name of Christ is being exploited for political gain. However, some people also say that the CDP uses Christianity to support its non-Christian agenda. Other people say that the slate is just an attempt to gain attention by the Party Speaker. The slate generally isn't taken very seriously, and is often mocked, such as the creation of the ["ASUCD Jewish Slate"].

Christian Democratic Party

KarlMogel — 2007-10-02 00:13:37

Revert to version 460 (banned user may not edit).

Differences for Christian Democratic Party

Deletions are marked with - .	Additions are marked with +.
Line 1:	Line 1:
- deleted	+ [[Image(Sol.JPG, right, thumbnail, "The Christian Democratic flag, the [wiki:wikipedia:Flag_of_Slovakia Flag of Slovakia] with a cross reduced and yellow text introduced on the second and third horizontal fields. ")]] + \|\|<bgcolor='#E0E0FF'>'''Website'''\|\| + \|\|[http://ucdavis.facebook.com/group_profile.php?gid=11150 Facebook page], only available to ["Facebook"] members.\|\| + \|\|<bgcolor='#E0E0FF'>'''Platform'''\|\| + \|\|["Christian Democratic Party/Platform"]\|\| + \|\|<bgcolor='#E0E0FF'>'''Publication(s)'''\|\| + \|\|["The Davis Enforcer"]\|\| + \|\|<bgcolor='#E0E0FF'>'''Party Speaker'''\|\| + \|\|["Steve Ostrowski"]\|\| + + The '''Christian Democratic Party''', formerly the Christian Slate, was a UC Davis SPAC-registered political club that only had two active, known members, ["Steve Ostrowski"] and ["Ronald Payne"]. Its primary member was ["Steve Ostrowski"]. Total group membership was considered basically just ["Steve Ostrowski"] and a friend or two (although this is debated by Steve, who claims there's a larger "unknown" membership), although at one point the group did contain 5 people who signed as "Officers" in order to register with ["SPAC"]. They consisted of Steve Ostrowski, ["Ronald Payne"], and three others who decline to publically affiliate themselves with the group. Most people don't think the officers were or are still actively involved with this group. + + The Christian Democratic Party supported ["Measure K"] and worked on the Yes on Proposition 85 campaign in ["Yolo County"]. This included campaigning in ["Davis"], ["Woodland"], and ["Winters"]. (Proposition 85 was similar to Proposition 73, parental notification for minors who want to have an abortion.) Both bills were defeated by wide margins in this county. What actual support they gave or work they put in is also up for debate, as the visibility of their support and work was very low, and the method of campaigning is unknown. + + The mention of a political party with a partly religious agenda has drawn criticisms from those in the community, and a few out of towners, who feel this would be a blow to the separation between church and state. ["Steve Ostrowski"] feels that trying to rally a Christian constituency is no different from rallying any other sort of one - that even if religion is a touchy subject in the modern world. Additionally, some Christians have objected to the party as their platform doesn't reflect Christianity and they feel that the name of Christ is being exploited for political gain. However, some people also say that the CDP uses Christianity to support its non-Christian agenda. Other people say that the slate is just an attempt to gain attention by the Party Speaker. + + The ["Jewish Slate"] was formed in order to mock the CDP's original name, the ["Christian Slate"]. + + = Purpose Statement = + + '''This group was designed to explore the possibility of creating a Christian political party on campus, an opposition party to ["LEAD"] dominance in ["ASUCD"] government, and to provide a new political force in Davis. The purpose of this political party is to do a number of things.''' + + 1. To advance the Christian Democratic agenda in the ["ASUCD"] government with the eventual control of the ["Senate"], Executive, Courts, and committees. + + 2. To create more awareness of the ["ASUCD"] system. Historically, the voter turnout has been lower than 10%. This party wants to work to encourage a dramatic increase in that turnout. + + 3. To provide debate and discussion within the Christian community. + + 4. To promote local, state, national, and international campaigns relevant to Christians along with charitable programs. + + While this political party does invoke the name of Christian in order to unite and provide discussion within the Christian community, they claim that non-Christians are welcome to join the party in all of its functions. As is shown by their repeated offers to get Jewish students to run for Senate with them as well as the presence of a couple of atheists in its early leadership structure. + + "You, the members with your input will determine the direction and platform of this party." + + =Fall Election Results 2006= + + ["Kirk Cowgill"] was the slate's first candidate to run for a seat in the ["ASUCD Senate"]. He received only 56 out of 3621 first place votes (1.6%). He was by far the least preferred candidate, being eliminated in the first round in the ["Choice Voting"] system and receiving 174 last place (#17 out of 17 candidates) votes, which was far more than any other candidate. Two of the six candidates the party endorsed (["Eric Friedman"] and ["Mara Harris"]) were elected to Senate. + + =Winter Election Results 2007= + + ["Ronald Payne"] was the slate's second candidate to run for a seat in the ["ASUCD Senate"]. He received 60 out of 4,374 first place votes and was eliminated in the second round. + + = Future Plans = + + ==Employment for Students== + + They want to employ students to work in advertising for the ["The Davis Enforcer"]. Employees will gain commissions for successfully landing ad deals. + + [[Comments]] + ------ + ''2006-11-08 23:55:12'' [[nbsp]] I didn't see anyone campaigning for yes on 85 anywhere in Davis...and Yolo county also rejected the amendment by a 25.6% margin --["TylerFelix"] + ------ + ''2007-02-24 00:57:59'' [[nbsp]] I'd like to see something more come out of this other than political nonsense... --["CarlosOverstreet"] + ------ + ''2007-02-25 22:15:58'' [[nbsp]] Oh man, sometimes coming back and reading the wiki really makes my day. Man! Selling cell phones. I never would have thought of that. --["JillWeinstein"] + ------ + ''2007-03-02 14:44:37'' [[nbsp]] First off, you have a flag, that walks the line of copyright issues... all you did was delete off one portion of the cross and slap your group's title on the flag and claimed it as yours. The campaigning was close to nill for the aforementioned propositions and until I was actually voting, I didn't see anything before (exluding internet sources) to show that this party existed or even fielded candidates. --["CarlosOverstreet"] + ------ + ''2007-08-11 03:29:40'' [[nbsp]] So, apparently the Christian Democratic Party is neither Christian, nor Democratic, nor a Party? --["Users/RichardYeh"] + * There was a CDP Boat Party. -["GregWebb"]

Christian Democratic Party

LabBanters — 2007-10-01 23:42:36

Page deleted (Malquoted, edit fullwise )

Differences for Christian Democratic Party

Deletions are marked with - .	Additions are marked with +.
Line 1:	Line 1:
- [[Image(Sol.JPG, right, thumbnail, "The Christian Democratic flag, the [wiki:wikipedia:Flag_of_Slovakia Flag of Slovakia] with a cross reduced and yellow text introduced on the second and third horizontal fields. ")]] - \|\|<bgcolor='#E0E0FF'>'''Website'''\|\| - \|\|[http://ucdavis.facebook.com/group_profile.php?gid=11150 Facebook page], only available to ["Facebook"] members.\|\| - \|\|<bgcolor='#E0E0FF'>'''Platform'''\|\| - \|\|["Christian Democratic Party/Platform"]\|\| - \|\|<bgcolor='#E0E0FF'>'''Publication(s)'''\|\| - \|\|["The Davis Enforcer"]\|\| - \|\|<bgcolor='#E0E0FF'>'''Party Speaker'''\|\| - \|\|["Steve Ostrowski"]\|\| - - The '''Christian Democratic Party''', formerly the Christian Slate, was a UC Davis SPAC-registered political club that only had two active, known members, ["Steve Ostrowski"] and ["Ronald Payne"]. Its primary member was ["Steve Ostrowski"]. Total group membership was considered basically just ["Steve Ostrowski"] and a friend or two (although this is debated by Steve, who claims there's a larger "unknown" membership), although at one point the group did contain 5 people who signed as "Officers" in order to register with ["SPAC"]. They consisted of Steve Ostrowski, ["Ronald Payne"], and three others who decline to publically affiliate themselves with the group. Most people don't think the officers were or are still actively involved with this group. - - The Christian Democratic Party supported ["Measure K"] and worked on the Yes on Proposition 85 campaign in ["Yolo County"]. This included campaigning in ["Davis"], ["Woodland"], and ["Winters"]. (Proposition 85 was similar to Proposition 73, parental notification for minors who want to have an abortion.) Both bills were defeated by wide margins in this county. What actual support they gave or work they put in is also up for debate, as the visibility of their support and work was very low, and the method of campaigning is unknown. - - The mention of a political party with a partly religious agenda has drawn criticisms from those in the community, and a few out of towners, who feel this would be a blow to the separation between church and state. ["Steve Ostrowski"] feels that trying to rally a Christian constituency is no different from rallying any other sort of one - that even if religion is a touchy subject in the modern world. Additionally, some Christians have objected to the party as their platform doesn't reflect Christianity and they feel that the name of Christ is being exploited for political gain. However, some people also say that the CDP uses Christianity to support its non-Christian agenda. Other people say that the slate is just an attempt to gain attention by the Party Speaker. - - The ["Jewish Slate"] was formed in order to mock the CDP's original name, the ["Christian Slate"]. - - = Purpose Statement = - - '''This group was designed to explore the possibility of creating a Christian political party on campus, an opposition party to ["LEAD"] dominance in ["ASUCD"] government, and to provide a new political force in Davis. The purpose of this political party is to do a number of things.''' - - 1. To advance the Christian Democratic agenda in the ["ASUCD"] government with the eventual control of the ["Senate"], Executive, Courts, and committees. - - 2. To create more awareness of the ["ASUCD"] system. Historically, the voter turnout has been lower than 10%. This party wants to work to encourage a dramatic increase in that turnout. - - 3. To provide debate and discussion within the Christian community. - - 4. To promote local, state, national, and international campaigns relevant to Christians along with charitable programs. - - While this political party does invoke the name of Christian in order to unite and provide discussion within the Christian community, they claim that non-Christians are welcome to join the party in all of its functions. As is shown by their repeated offers to get Jewish students to run for Senate with them as well as the presence of a couple of atheists in its early leadership structure. - - "You, the members with your input will determine the direction and platform of this party." - - =Fall Election Results 2006= - - ["Kirk Cowgill"] was the slate's first candidate to run for a seat in the ["ASUCD Senate"]. He received only 56 out of 3621 first place votes (1.6%). He was by far the least preferred candidate, being eliminated in the first round in the ["Choice Voting"] system and receiving 174 last place (#17 out of 17 candidates) votes, which was far more than any other candidate. Two of the six candidates the party endorsed (["Eric Friedman"] and ["Mara Harris"]) were elected to Senate. - - =Winter Election Results 2007= - - ["Ronald Payne"] was the slate's second candidate to run for a seat in the ["ASUCD Senate"]. He received 60 out of 4,374 first place votes and was eliminated in the second round. - - = Future Plans = - - ==Employment for Students== - - They want to employ students to work in advertising for the ["The Davis Enforcer"]. Employees will gain commissions for successfully landing ad deals. - - [[Comments]] - ------ - ''2006-11-08 23:55:12'' [[nbsp]] I didn't see anyone campaigning for yes on 85 anywhere in Davis...and Yolo county also rejected the amendment by a 25.6% margin --["TylerFelix"] - ------ - ''2007-02-24 00:57:59'' [[nbsp]] I'd like to see something more come out of this other than political nonsense... --["CarlosOverstreet"] - ------ - ''2007-02-25 22:15:58'' [[nbsp]] Oh man, sometimes coming back and reading the wiki really makes my day. Man! Selling cell phones. I never would have thought of that. --["JillWeinstein"] - ------ - ''2007-03-02 14:44:37'' [[nbsp]] First off, you have a flag, that walks the line of copyright issues... all you did was delete off one portion of the cross and slap your group's title on the flag and claimed it as yours. The campaigning was close to nill for the aforementioned propositions and until I was actually voting, I didn't see anything before (exluding internet sources) to show that this party existed or even fielded candidates. --["CarlosOverstreet"] - ------ - ''2007-08-11 03:29:40'' [[nbsp]] So, apparently the Christian Democratic Party is neither Christian, nor Democratic, nor a Party? --["Users/RichardYeh"] - * There was a CDP Boat Party. -["GregWebb"]	+ deleted

Christian Democratic Party

KarlMogel — 2007-09-11 18:02:57

noting defeat of 73 and 85

Differences for Christian Democratic Party

Deletions are marked with - .	Additions are marked with +.
Line 13:	Line 13:
- The Christian Democratic Party supported ["Measure K"] and worked on the Yes on Proposition 85 campaign in ["Yolo County"]. This included campaigning in ["Davis"], ["Woodland"], and ["Winters"]. (Proposition 85 was similar to Proposition 73, parental notification for minors who want to have an abortion.) What actual support they gave or work they put in is also up for debate, as the visibility of their support and work was very low, and the method of campaigning is unknown.	+ The Christian Democratic Party supported ["Measure K"] and worked on the Yes on Proposition 85 campaign in ["Yolo County"]. This included campaigning in ["Davis"], ["Woodland"], and ["Winters"]. (Proposition 85 was similar to Proposition 73, parental notification for minors who want to have an abortion.) Both bills were defeated by wide margins in this county. What actual support they gave or work they put in is also up for debate, as the visibility of their support and work was very low, and the method of campaigning is unknown.
Line 15:	Line 15:
- The mention of a political party with a partly religious agenda has drawn criticisms from those in the community, and a few out of towners, who feel this would be a blow to the separation between church and state. ["Steve Ostrowski"] feels that trying to rally a Christian constituency is no different from rallying any other sort of one - that even if religion is a touchy subject in the modern world. Additionally, some Christians have objected to the party as their platform doesn't reflect Christianity and they feel that the name of Christ is being exploited for political gain. However, some people also say that the CDP uses Christianity to support its non-Christian agenda. Other people say that the slate is just an attempt to attention whore by the Party Speaker.	+ The mention of a political party with a partly religious agenda has drawn criticisms from those in the community, and a few out of towners, who feel this would be a blow to the separation between church and state. ["Steve Ostrowski"] feels that trying to rally a Christian constituency is no different from rallying any other sort of one - that even if religion is a touchy subject in the modern world. Additionally, some Christians have objected to the party as their platform doesn't reflect Christianity and they feel that the name of Christ is being exploited for political gain. However, some people also say that the CDP uses Christianity to support its non-Christian agenda. Other people say that the slate is just an attempt to gain attention by the Party Speaker.

Christian Democratic Party

EdWins — 2007-08-17 11:08:46

wasn't that steves personal plan, not the parties?

Differences for Christian Democratic Party

Deletions are marked with - .	Additions are marked with +.
Line 47:	Line 47:
- The Christian Democratic Party claims to have connections that can lead to successful part time work within a telecommunications company. Employed members will receive commissions and residual income benefits. This ability is consistent with the Christian Democratic philosophy towards creating successful student led businesses at UC Davis. - - They also want to employ students to work in advertising for the ["The Davis Enforcer"]. Employees will gain commissions for successfully landing ad deals.	+ They want to employ students to work in advertising for the ["The Davis Enforcer"]. Employees will gain commissions for successfully landing ad deals.

Christian Democratic Party

JamesSchwab — 2007-08-17 10:31:59

no longer spac

Differences for Christian Democratic Party

Deletions are marked with - .	Additions are marked with +.
Line 11:	Line 11:
- The '''Christian Democratic Party''', formerly the Christian Slate, is a UC Davis SPAC-registered political club currently only has two active, known members, ["Steve Ostrowski"] and ["Ronald Payne"]. Its primary member is ["Steve Ostrowski"]. Total group membership is considered basically just ["Steve Ostrowski"] and a friend or two (although this is debated by Steve, who claims there's a larger "unknown" membership), although at one point the group did contain 5 people who signed as "Officers" in order to register with ["SPAC"]. They consisted of Steve Ostrowski, ["Ronald Payne"], and three others who decline to publically affiliate themselves with the group. Most people don't think the officers were or are still actively involved with this group.	+ The '''Christian Democratic Party''', formerly the Christian Slate, was a UC Davis SPAC-registered political club that only had two active, known members, ["Steve Ostrowski"] and ["Ronald Payne"]. Its primary member was ["Steve Ostrowski"]. Total group membership was considered basically just ["Steve Ostrowski"] and a friend or two (although this is debated by Steve, who claims there's a larger "unknown" membership), although at one point the group did contain 5 people who signed as "Officers" in order to register with ["SPAC"]. They consisted of Steve Ostrowski, ["Ronald Payne"], and three others who decline to publically affiliate themselves with the group. Most people don't think the officers were or are still actively involved with this group.

Christian Democratic Party

GregWebb — 2007-08-11 02:48:27

Differences for Christian Democratic Party

Deletions are marked with - .	Additions are marked with +.
Line 62:	Line 62:
	+ * There was a CDP Boat Party. -["GregWebb"]

Christian Democratic Party

RichardYeh — 2007-08-11 02:29:40

Comment added.

Differences for Christian Democratic Party

Deletions are marked with - .	Additions are marked with +.
Line 60:	Line 60:
	+ ------ + ''2007-08-11 03:29:40'' [[nbsp]] So, apparently the Christian Democratic Party is neither Christian, nor Democratic, nor a Party? --["Users/RichardYeh"]

Christian Democratic Party

BrentLaabs — 2007-06-07 14:41:18

deorphanizing jewish slate

Differences for Christian Democratic Party

Deletions are marked with - .	Additions are marked with +.
Line 15:	Line 15:
- The mention of a political party with a partly religious agenda has drawn criticisms from those in the community, and a few out of towners, who feel this would be a blow to the separation between church and state. ["Steve Ostrowski"] feels that trying to rally a Christian constituency is no different from rallying any other sort of one - that even if religion is a touchy subject in the modern world. Additionally, some Christians have objected to the party as their platform doesn't reflect Christianity and they feel that the name of Christ is being exploited for political gain. However, some people also say that the CDP uses Christianity to support its non-Christian agenda.	+ The mention of a political party with a partly religious agenda has drawn criticisms from those in the community, and a few out of towners, who feel this would be a blow to the separation between church and state. ["Steve Ostrowski"] feels that trying to rally a Christian constituency is no different from rallying any other sort of one - that even if religion is a touchy subject in the modern world. Additionally, some Christians have objected to the party as their platform doesn't reflect Christianity and they feel that the name of Christ is being exploited for political gain. However, some people also say that the CDP uses Christianity to support its non-Christian agenda. Other people say that the slate is just an attempt to attention whore by the Party Speaker. + + The ["Jewish Slate"] was formed in order to mock the CDP's original name, the ["Christian Slate"].

Christian Democratic Party

EdWins — 2007-03-31 17:00:25

link edit

Differences for Christian Democratic Party

Deletions are marked with - .	Additions are marked with +.
Line 9:	Line 9:
- \|\|["SteveOstrowski" Steven Ostrowski]\|\|	+ \|\|["Steve Ostrowski"]\|\|

Christian Democratic Party

WilliamLewis — 2007-03-17 08:48:40

Flag text refers to old flag. "Pledge" and "Anthem" aren't important.

Differences for Christian Democratic Party

Deletions are marked with - .	Additions are marked with +.
Line 16:	Line 16:
- - Flag: The [wiki:wikipedia:Flag_of_Slovakia Flag of Slovakia] with the patriarchal cross of the Coat of Arms of Slovakia reduced to a crux ordinaria. Catholic and Christian icons combined to show unity within the Christian community. The Christian icon is the blue for royalty and red for the martyrs with the cross. The Vatican flag details the keys of St. Peter. The CDP's colors are Blue and Red. - - Anthem: Imperial March - - Pledge of Allegiance: Lord's Prayer aka "Our Father."

Christian Democratic Party

JabberWokky — 2007-03-17 06:20:21

rm SPAC commments and deletion questions. (resolved)

Differences for Christian Democratic Party

Deletions are marked with - .	Additions are marked with +.
Line 63:	Line 63:
- ''2007-03-02 14:44:22'' [[nbsp]] I'm not sure deleting this page is necessarily the right course of action. Perhaps keeping it for historical reasons and making note of its demise on this page? If it is deleted, some of the relevant info should be moved to ["Steve Ostrowski"]'s public page. Since the "party" was pretty much Steve himself, that would be apt. --["KarlMogel"] - ------
Line 66:	Line 64:
- ------ - ''2007-03-02 14:46:03'' [[nbsp]] We are a SPAC group, leave it alone. It doesn't matter how much or less we do. --["SteveOstrowski"] - ------ - ''2007-03-02 14:50:47'' [[nbsp]] If they are a registered SPAC group, they should have an entry. Add their inactivity and visibility issues to the entry if need be. --["JabberWokky"] - * SPAC needs real requirements, imo. -["EdwinSaada" ES] - ------ - ''2007-03-02 15:32:48'' [[nbsp]] Confirmed - registered SPAC. --["KarlMogel"]

Christian Democratic Party

BrentLaabs — 2007-03-17 02:07:32

Revert to version 447.

Differences for Christian Democratic Party

Deletions are marked with - .	Additions are marked with +.
Line 4:	Line 4:
	+ \|\|<bgcolor='#E0E0FF'>'''Platform'''\|\| + \|\|["Christian Democratic Party/Platform"]\|\| + \|\|<bgcolor='#E0E0FF'>'''Publication(s)'''\|\| + \|\|["The Davis Enforcer"]\|\|
Line 9:	Line 13:
- The Christian Democratic Party supported ["Measure K"] and claims to have worked on the Yes on Proposition 85 campaign in ["Yolo County"]. This included campaigning in ["Davis"], ["Woodland"], and ["Winters"]. (Proposition 85 was similar to Proposition 73, parental notification for minors who want to have an abortion.) What actual support they gave or work they put in is also up for debate, as the visibility of their support and work was very low, and the method of campaigning is unknown. - - - The Christian Democratic Party was supposedly going to organize donations, food drives, and fundraising for charity, but has yet to organize a single event.	+ The Christian Democratic Party supported ["Measure K"] and worked on the Yes on Proposition 85 campaign in ["Yolo County"]. This included campaigning in ["Davis"], ["Woodland"], and ["Winters"]. (Proposition 85 was similar to Proposition 73, parental notification for minors who want to have an abortion.) What actual support they gave or work they put in is also up for debate, as the visibility of their support and work was very low, and the method of campaigning is unknown.
Line 21:	Line 22:
- - [[TableOfContents]]
Line 39:	Line 38:
- - =AS Papers Publication= - - The Christian Democratic Party publishes the ["The Davis Enforcer"]. The CDP was [http://media.www.californiaaggie.com/media/storage/paper981/news/2007/02/26/CampusNews/News-In.Brief-2742559-page3.shtml mentioned] in the ["California Aggie"] February 26, 2007. - - = ASUCD Platform = - - See ["/platform" Platform].

Christian Democratic Party

SteveOstrowski — 2007-03-17 01:19:18

Revert to version 448 (It's already on).

Differences for Christian Democratic Party

Deletions are marked with - .	Additions are marked with +.
Line 42:	Line 42:
- The Christian Democratic Party publishes the ["The Davis Enforcer"].	+ The Christian Democratic Party publishes the ["The Davis Enforcer"]. The CDP was [http://media.www.californiaaggie.com/media/storage/paper981/news/2007/02/26/CampusNews/News-In.Brief-2742559-page3.shtml mentioned] in the ["California Aggie"] February 26, 2007.

Christian Democratic Party

EdWins — 2007-03-17 00:55:37

dude, that "info" is already on the page it should be on.

Differences for Christian Democratic Party

Deletions are marked with - .	Additions are marked with +.
Line 42:	Line 42:
- The Christian Democratic Party publishes the ["The Davis Enforcer"]. The CDP was [http://media.www.californiaaggie.com/media/storage/paper981/news/2007/02/26/CampusNews/News-In.Brief-2742559-page3.shtml mentioned] in the ["California Aggie"] February 26, 2007.	+ The Christian Democratic Party publishes the ["The Davis Enforcer"].

Christian Democratic Party

SteveOstrowski — 2007-03-17 00:44:43

Revert to version 446 (Your edits only take away info).

Differences for Christian Democratic Party

Deletions are marked with - .	Additions are marked with +.
Line 4:	Line 4:
- \|\|<bgcolor='#E0E0FF'>'''Platform'''\|\| - \|\|["Christian Democratic Party/Platform"]\|\| - \|\|<bgcolor='#E0E0FF'>'''Publication(s)'''\|\| - \|\|["The Davis Enforcer"]\|\|
Line 13:	Line 9:
- The Christian Democratic Party supported ["Measure K"] and worked on the Yes on Proposition 85 campaign in ["Yolo County"]. This included campaigning in ["Davis"], ["Woodland"], and ["Winters"]. (Proposition 85 was similar to Proposition 73, parental notification for minors who want to have an abortion.) What actual support they gave or work they put in is also up for debate, as the visibility of their support and work was very low, and the method of campaigning is unknown.	+ The Christian Democratic Party supported ["Measure K"] and claims to have worked on the Yes on Proposition 85 campaign in ["Yolo County"]. This included campaigning in ["Davis"], ["Woodland"], and ["Winters"]. (Proposition 85 was similar to Proposition 73, parental notification for minors who want to have an abortion.) What actual support they gave or work they put in is also up for debate, as the visibility of their support and work was very low, and the method of campaigning is unknown. + + + The Christian Democratic Party was supposedly going to organize donations, food drives, and fundraising for charity, but has yet to organize a single event.
Line 22:	Line 21:
	+ + [[TableOfContents]]
Line 38:	Line 39:
	+ + =AS Papers Publication= + + The Christian Democratic Party publishes the ["The Davis Enforcer"]. The CDP was [http://media.www.californiaaggie.com/media/storage/paper981/news/2007/02/26/CampusNews/News-In.Brief-2742559-page3.shtml mentioned] in the ["California Aggie"] February 26, 2007. + + = ASUCD Platform = + + See ["/platform" Platform].

Christian Democratic Party

WilliamLewis — 2007-03-16 23:56:38

Revert to version 445 (This isn't your page. Stop messing with it.).

Differences for Christian Democratic Party

Deletions are marked with - .	Additions are marked with +.
Line 4:	Line 4:
	+ \|\|<bgcolor='#E0E0FF'>'''Platform'''\|\| + \|\|["Christian Democratic Party/Platform"]\|\| + \|\|<bgcolor='#E0E0FF'>'''Publication(s)'''\|\| + \|\|["The Davis Enforcer"]\|\|
Line 9:	Line 13:
- The Christian Democratic Party supported ["Measure K"] and claims to have worked on the Yes on Proposition 85 campaign in ["Yolo County"]. This included campaigning in ["Davis"], ["Woodland"], and ["Winters"]. (Proposition 85 was similar to Proposition 73, parental notification for minors who want to have an abortion.) What actual support they gave or work they put in is also up for debate, as the visibility of their support and work was very low, and the method of campaigning is unknown. - - - The Christian Democratic Party was supposedly going to organize donations, food drives, and fundraising for charity, but has yet to organize a single event.	+ The Christian Democratic Party supported ["Measure K"] and worked on the Yes on Proposition 85 campaign in ["Yolo County"]. This included campaigning in ["Davis"], ["Woodland"], and ["Winters"]. (Proposition 85 was similar to Proposition 73, parental notification for minors who want to have an abortion.) What actual support they gave or work they put in is also up for debate, as the visibility of their support and work was very low, and the method of campaigning is unknown.
Line 21:	Line 22:
- - [[TableOfContents]]
Line 39:	Line 38:
- - =AS Papers Publication= - - The Christian Democratic Party publishes the ["The Davis Enforcer"]. The CDP was [http://media.www.californiaaggie.com/media/storage/paper981/news/2007/02/26/CampusNews/News-In.Brief-2742559-page3.shtml mentioned] in the ["California Aggie"] February 26, 2007. - - = ASUCD Platform = - - See ["/platform" Platform].

Christian Democratic Party

SteveOstrowski — 2007-03-16 23:47:53

Revert to version 443.

Differences for Christian Democratic Party

Deletions are marked with - .	Additions are marked with +.
Line 4:	Line 4:
- \|\|<bgcolor='#E0E0FF'>'''Platform'''\|\| - \|\|["Christian Democratic Party/Platform"]\|\| - \|\|<bgcolor='#E0E0FF'>'''Publication(s)'''\|\| - \|\|["The Davis Enforcer"]\|\|
Line 13:	Line 9:
- The Christian Democratic Party supported ["Measure K"] and worked on the Yes on Proposition 85 campaign in ["Yolo County"]. This included campaigning in ["Davis"], ["Woodland"], and ["Winters"]. (Proposition 85 was similar to Proposition 73, parental notification for minors who want to have an abortion.) What actual support they gave or work they put in is also up for debate, as the visibility of their support and work was very low, and the method of campaigning is unknown.	+ The Christian Democratic Party supported ["Measure K"] and claims to have worked on the Yes on Proposition 85 campaign in ["Yolo County"]. This included campaigning in ["Davis"], ["Woodland"], and ["Winters"]. (Proposition 85 was similar to Proposition 73, parental notification for minors who want to have an abortion.) What actual support they gave or work they put in is also up for debate, as the visibility of their support and work was very low, and the method of campaigning is unknown. + + + The Christian Democratic Party was supposedly going to organize donations, food drives, and fundraising for charity, but has yet to organize a single event.
Line 22:	Line 21:
	+ + [[TableOfContents]]
Line 38:	Line 39:
	+ + =AS Papers Publication= + + The Christian Democratic Party publishes the ["The Davis Enforcer"]. The CDP was [http://media.www.californiaaggie.com/media/storage/paper981/news/2007/02/26/CampusNews/News-In.Brief-2742559-page3.shtml mentioned] in the ["California Aggie"] February 26, 2007. + + = ASUCD Platform = + + See ["/platform" Platform].

Christian Democratic Party

WilliamLewis — 2007-03-16 23:29:41

This page needs some serious cleanup. Rewrite after finals.

Differences for Christian Democratic Party

Deletions are marked with - .	Additions are marked with +.
Line 4:	Line 4:
	+ \|\|<bgcolor='#E0E0FF'>'''Platform'''\|\| + \|\|["Christian Democratic Party/Platform"]\|\| + \|\|<bgcolor='#E0E0FF'>'''Publication(s)'''\|\| + \|\|["The Davis Enforcer"]\|\|
Line 9:	Line 13:
- The Christian Democratic Party supported ["Measure K"] and claims to have worked on the Yes on Proposition 85 campaign in ["Yolo County"]. This included campaigning in ["Davis"], ["Woodland"], and ["Winters"]. (Proposition 85 was similar to Proposition 73, parental notification for minors who want to have an abortion.) What actual support they gave or work they put in is also up for debate, as the visibility of their support and work was very low, and the method of campaigning is unknown. - - The Christian Democratic Party was supposedly going to organize donations, food drives, and fundraising for charity, but has yet to organize a single event.	+ The Christian Democratic Party supported ["Measure K"] and worked on the Yes on Proposition 85 campaign in ["Yolo County"]. This included campaigning in ["Davis"], ["Woodland"], and ["Winters"]. (Proposition 85 was similar to Proposition 73, parental notification for minors who want to have an abortion.) What actual support they gave or work they put in is also up for debate, as the visibility of their support and work was very low, and the method of campaigning is unknown.
Line 20:	Line 22:
- - [[TableOfContents]]
Line 38:	Line 38:
- - =AS Papers Publication= - - The Christian Democratic Party publishes the ["The Davis Enforcer"]. - - = ASUCD Platform = - - See ["/platform" Platform].

Christian Democratic Party

WilliamLewis — 2007-03-16 21:39:45

Revert to version 442 (rm info irrelevant to the CDP).

Differences for Christian Democratic Party

Deletions are marked with - .	Additions are marked with +.
Line 10:	Line 10:
-
Line 42:	Line 41:
- The Christian Democratic Party publishes the ["The Davis Enforcer"]. The CDP was [http://media.www.californiaaggie.com/media/storage/paper981/news/2007/02/26/CampusNews/News-In.Brief-2742559-page3.shtml mentioned] in the ["California Aggie"] February 26, 2007.	+ The Christian Democratic Party publishes the ["The Davis Enforcer"].

Christian Democratic Party

SteveOstrowski — 2007-03-16 16:03:16

Revert to version 441.

Differences for Christian Democratic Party

Deletions are marked with - .	Additions are marked with +.
Line 10:	Line 10:
	+
Line 41:	Line 42:
- The Christian Democratic Party publishes the ["The Davis Enforcer"].	+ The Christian Democratic Party publishes the ["The Davis Enforcer"]. The CDP was [http://media.www.californiaaggie.com/media/storage/paper981/news/2007/02/26/CampusNews/News-In.Brief-2742559-page3.shtml mentioned] in the ["California Aggie"] February 26, 2007.

Christian Democratic Party

WilliamLewis — 2007-03-16 15:50:37

Revert to version 440.

Differences for Christian Democratic Party

Deletions are marked with - .	Additions are marked with +.
Line 10:	Line 10:
-
Line 42:	Line 41:
- The Christian Democratic Party publishes the ["The Davis Enforcer"]. The CDP was [http://media.www.californiaaggie.com/media/storage/paper981/news/2007/02/26/CampusNews/News-In.Brief-2742559-page3.shtml mentioned] in the ["California Aggie"] February 26, 2007.	+ The Christian Democratic Party publishes the ["The Davis Enforcer"].

Christian Democratic Party

SteveOstrowski — 2007-03-16 15:37:07

Revert to version 439 (I don't like your apparent dislike for information ).

Differences for Christian Democratic Party

Deletions are marked with - .	Additions are marked with +.
Line 10:	Line 10:
	+
Line 41:	Line 42:
- The Christian Democratic Party publishes the ["The Davis Enforcer"].	+ The Christian Democratic Party publishes the ["The Davis Enforcer"]. The CDP was [http://media.www.californiaaggie.com/media/storage/paper981/news/2007/02/26/CampusNews/News-In.Brief-2742559-page3.shtml mentioned] in the ["California Aggie"] February 26, 2007.

Christian Democratic Party

WilliamLewis — 2007-03-16 15:23:18

Revert to version 437 (Irrelevant. Get your own website if you want to junk this entry up more.).

Differences for Christian Democratic Party

Deletions are marked with - .	Additions are marked with +.
Line 10:	Line 10:
-
Line 42:	Line 41:
- The Christian Democratic Party publishes the ["The Davis Enforcer"]. The CDP was [http://media.www.californiaaggie.com/media/storage/paper981/news/2007/02/26/CampusNews/News-In.Brief-2742559-page3.shtml mentioned] in the ["California Aggie"] February 26, 2007.	+ The Christian Democratic Party publishes the ["The Davis Enforcer"].

Christian Democratic Party

SteveOstrowski — 2007-03-16 15:02:52

Differences for Christian Democratic Party

Deletions are marked with - .	Additions are marked with +.
Line 42:	Line 42:
- The Christian Democratic Party publishes the ["The Davis Enforcer"]. The CDP was first [http://media.www.californiaaggie.com/media/storage/paper981/news/2007/02/26/CampusNews/News-In.Brief-2742559-page3.shtml mentioned] in the ["California Aggie"] February 26, 2007.	+ The Christian Democratic Party publishes the ["The Davis Enforcer"]. The CDP was [http://media.www.californiaaggie.com/media/storage/paper981/news/2007/02/26/CampusNews/News-In.Brief-2742559-page3.shtml mentioned] in the ["California Aggie"] February 26, 2007.

Christian Democratic Party

SteveOstrowski — 2007-03-16 15:02:38

Revert to version 436.

Differences for Christian Democratic Party

Deletions are marked with - .	Additions are marked with +.
Line 10:	Line 10:
	+
Line 41:	Line 42:
- The Christian Democratic Party publishes the ["The Davis Enforcer"].	+ The Christian Democratic Party publishes the ["The Davis Enforcer"]. The CDP was first [http://media.www.californiaaggie.com/media/storage/paper981/news/2007/02/26/CampusNews/News-In.Brief-2742559-page3.shtml mentioned] in the ["California Aggie"] February 26, 2007.

Christian Democratic Party

WilliamLewis — 2007-03-16 14:55:09

Revert to version 435 (Nobody cares when the aggie first mentioned the paper.).

Differences for Christian Democratic Party

Deletions are marked with - .	Additions are marked with +.
Line 10:	Line 10:
-
Line 42:	Line 41:
- The Christian Democratic Party publishes the ["The Davis Enforcer"]. The CDP was first [http://media.www.californiaaggie.com/media/storage/paper981/news/2007/02/26/CampusNews/News-In.Brief-2742559-page3.shtml mentioned] in the ["California Aggie"] February 26, 2007.	+ The Christian Democratic Party publishes the ["The Davis Enforcer"].

Christian Democratic Party

SteveOstrowski — 2007-03-16 14:20:29

Revert to version 434.

Differences for Christian Democratic Party

Deletions are marked with - .	Additions are marked with +.
Line 10:	Line 10:
	+
Line 41:	Line 42:
- The Christian Democratic Party publishes the ["The Davis Enforcer"].	+ The Christian Democratic Party publishes the ["The Davis Enforcer"]. The CDP was first [http://media.www.californiaaggie.com/media/storage/paper981/news/2007/02/26/CampusNews/News-In.Brief-2742559-page3.shtml mentioned] in the ["California Aggie"] February 26, 2007.

Christian Democratic Party

WilliamLewis — 2007-03-16 14:00:20

Revert to version 433 (rm irrelevant clutter).

Differences for Christian Democratic Party

Deletions are marked with - .	Additions are marked with +.
Line 10:	Line 10:
-
Line 42:	Line 41:
- The Christian Democratic Party publishes the ["The Davis Enforcer"]. The CDP was first [http://media.www.californiaaggie.com/media/storage/paper981/news/2007/02/26/CampusNews/News-In.Brief-2742559-page3.shtml mentioned] in the ["California Aggie"] February 26, 2007.	+ The Christian Democratic Party publishes the ["The Davis Enforcer"].

Christian Democratic Party

SteveOstrowski — 2007-03-16 13:32:48

Differences for Christian Democratic Party

Deletions are marked with - .	Additions are marked with +.
Line 10:	Line 10:
	+
Line 41:	Line 42:
- The Christian Democratic Party publishes the ["The Davis Enforcer"].	+ The Christian Democratic Party publishes the ["The Davis Enforcer"]. The CDP was first [http://media.www.californiaaggie.com/media/storage/paper981/news/2007/02/26/CampusNews/News-In.Brief-2742559-page3.shtml mentioned] in the ["California Aggie"] February 26, 2007.

Christian Democratic Party

KarlMogel — 2007-03-05 17:50:50

ah, that's where the last link was.

Differences for Christian Democratic Party

Deletions are marked with - .	Additions are marked with +.
Line 81:	Line 81:
- ------ - ''2007-03-05 17:21:58'' [[nbsp]] Is it necessary to have this page AND ["Christian Slate/platform"]? Just a thought. --["GeoffJohnson"]

Christian Democratic Party

KarlMogel — 2007-03-05 17:49:14

I wonder why the shift to Christian Slate language?

Differences for Christian Democratic Party

Deletions are marked with - .	Additions are marked with +.
Line 59:	Line 59:
- The Christian Slate claims to have connections that can lead to successful part time work within a telecommunications company. Employed members will receive commissions and residual income benefits. This ability is consistent with the Christian Democratic philosophy towards creating successful student led businesses at UC Davis.	+ The Christian Democratic Party claims to have connections that can lead to successful part time work within a telecommunications company. Employed members will receive commissions and residual income benefits. This ability is consistent with the Christian Democratic philosophy towards creating successful student led businesses at UC Davis.

Christian Democratic Party

KarlMogel — 2007-03-05 17:47:37

redundant link

Differences for Christian Democratic Party

Deletions are marked with - .	Additions are marked with +.
Line 9:	Line 9:
- The Christian Democratic Party supported ["Measure K"] and claims to have worked on the Yes on Proposition 85 campaign in ["Yolo County"]. This included campaigning in ["Davis"], ["Woodland"], and ["Winters"]. (Proposition 85 was similar to Proposition 73, parental notification for minors who want to have an abortion.) What actual support they gave or work they put in is also up for debate, as the visibility of their support and work was very low, and the method of campaigning is unknown. For more information on this party's platform, see ["/Platform" Platform].	+ The Christian Democratic Party supported ["Measure K"] and claims to have worked on the Yes on Proposition 85 campaign in ["Yolo County"]. This included campaigning in ["Davis"], ["Woodland"], and ["Winters"]. (Proposition 85 was similar to Proposition 73, parental notification for minors who want to have an abortion.) What actual support they gave or work they put in is also up for debate, as the visibility of their support and work was very low, and the method of campaigning is unknown.
Line 45:	Line 45:
- See ["Christian Slate/platform"].	+ See ["/platform" Platform].

Christian Democratic Party

KarlMogel — 2007-03-05 17:46:18

Link to platform page

Differences for Christian Democratic Party

Deletions are marked with - .	Additions are marked with +.
Line 9:	Line 9:
- The Christian Democratic Party supported ["Measure K"] and claims to have worked on the Yes on Proposition 85 campaign in ["Yolo County"]. This included campaigning in ["Davis"], ["Woodland"], and ["Winters"]. (Proposition 85 was similar to Proposition 73, parental notification for minors who want to have an abortion.) What actual support they gave or work they put in is also up for debate, as the visibility of their support and work was very low, and the method of campaigning is unknown.	+ The Christian Democratic Party supported ["Measure K"] and claims to have worked on the Yes on Proposition 85 campaign in ["Yolo County"]. This included campaigning in ["Davis"], ["Woodland"], and ["Winters"]. (Proposition 85 was similar to Proposition 73, parental notification for minors who want to have an abortion.) What actual support they gave or work they put in is also up for debate, as the visibility of their support and work was very low, and the method of campaigning is unknown. For more information on this party's platform, see ["/Platform" Platform].

Christian Democratic Party

GeoffJohnson — 2007-03-05 17:26:24

Fixed link

Differences for Christian Democratic Party

Deletions are marked with - .	Additions are marked with +.
Line 82:	Line 82:
- ''2007-03-05 17:21:58'' [[nbsp]] Is it necessary to have this page AND [[''Christian Slate/Platform'']]? Just a thought. --["GeoffJohnson"]	+ ''2007-03-05 17:21:58'' [[nbsp]] Is it necessary to have this page AND ["Christian Slate/platform"]? Just a thought. --["GeoffJohnson"]

Christian Democratic Party

GeoffJohnson — 2007-03-05 17:21:58

Comment added.

Differences for Christian Democratic Party

Deletions are marked with - .	Additions are marked with +.
Line 81:	Line 81:
	+ ------ + ''2007-03-05 17:21:58'' [[nbsp]] Is it necessary to have this page AND [[''Christian Slate/Platform'']]? Just a thought. --["GeoffJohnson"]

Christian Democratic Party

WilliamLewis — 2007-03-05 11:31:12

Revert to version 425 (If you want to put this stuff up, get your own webpage. Irrelevant right now.).

Differences for Christian Democratic Party

Deletions are marked with - .	Additions are marked with +.
Line 59:	Line 59:
- The Christian Slate has connections that can lead to successful part time work within a telecommunications company. Employed members will receive commissions and residual income benefits. This ability is consistent with the Christian Democratic philosophy towards creating successful student led businesses at UC Davis.	+ The Christian Slate claims to have connections that can lead to successful part time work within a telecommunications company. Employed members will receive commissions and residual income benefits. This ability is consistent with the Christian Democratic philosophy towards creating successful student led businesses at UC Davis.
Line 61:	Line 61:
- We also want to employ students to work in advertising for the ["The Davis Enforcer"]. If a member of our team successfully gathers advertising they will receive a commission on what they collect and continue to receive a commission for as long as that business continues to advertise with the Davis Enforcer. - - ==New Technology== - - We have the connections necessary to sell cheap cellular telephones as well as free company to company calling. There are thousands of students with cell phones at UC Davis and we can easily lower cell phone bills for all of them. - - We have access to VOIP products which will allow foreign exchange students to cheaply contact friends and family here in the United States. Every call will act as a local call. In addition we will sell off Video Phones allowing people to see and hear who they are talking to. - - We are unique to any business organization because we have access to all classrooms and lecture rooms on the campus. This allows us to make business presentations to students right here in UC Davis. Company Representatives are also members of the Christian Slate which grants personal access to how the products and company work. - - == ASUCD Ballot Measure== - - We are currently creating a team which will organize a Ballot Measure campaign for the Pledge of Allegiance. We are going to start the process in April. - -	+ They also want to employ students to work in advertising for the ["The Davis Enforcer"]. Employees will gain commissions for successfully landing ad deals.
Line 80:	Line 66:
- ------

Christian Democratic Party

SteveOstrowski — 2007-03-05 11:29:00

Revert to version 423.

Differences for Christian Democratic Party

Deletions are marked with - .	Additions are marked with +.
Line 59:	Line 59:
- The Christian Slate claims to have connections that can lead to successful part time work within a telecommunications company. Employed members will receive commissions and residual income benefits. This ability is consistent with the Christian Democratic philosophy towards creating successful student led businesses at UC Davis.	+ The Christian Slate has connections that can lead to successful part time work within a telecommunications company. Employed members will receive commissions and residual income benefits. This ability is consistent with the Christian Democratic philosophy towards creating successful student led businesses at UC Davis.
Line 61:	Line 61:
- They also want to employ students to work in advertising for the ["The Davis Enforcer"]. Employees will gain commissions for successfully landing ad deals.	+ We also want to employ students to work in advertising for the ["The Davis Enforcer"]. If a member of our team successfully gathers advertising they will receive a commission on what they collect and continue to receive a commission for as long as that business continues to advertise with the Davis Enforcer. + + ==New Technology== + + We have the connections necessary to sell cheap cellular telephones as well as free company to company calling. There are thousands of students with cell phones at UC Davis and we can easily lower cell phone bills for all of them. + + We have access to VOIP products which will allow foreign exchange students to cheaply contact friends and family here in the United States. Every call will act as a local call. In addition we will sell off Video Phones allowing people to see and hear who they are talking to. + + We are unique to any business organization because we have access to all classrooms and lecture rooms on the campus. This allows us to make business presentations to students right here in UC Davis. Company Representatives are also members of the Christian Slate which grants personal access to how the products and company work. + + == ASUCD Ballot Measure== + + We are currently creating a team which will organize a Ballot Measure campaign for the Pledge of Allegiance. We are going to start the process in April. + +
Line 66:	Line 80:
	+ ------

Christian Democratic Party

WilliamLewis — 2007-03-05 11:28:35

Differences for Christian Democratic Party

Deletions are marked with - .	Additions are marked with +.
Line 61:	Line 61:
- They also want to employ students to work in advertising for the ["The Davis Enforcer"]. If a member of our team successfully gathers advertising they will receive a commission on what they collect and continue to receive a commission for as long as that business continues to advertise with the Davis Enforcer.	+ They also want to employ students to work in advertising for the ["The Davis Enforcer"]. Employees will gain commissions for successfully landing ad deals.

Christian Democratic Party

WilliamLewis — 2007-03-05 11:27:22

rm cruft, nonsense, and redundant stuff, changed to third person

Differences for Christian Democratic Party

Deletions are marked with - .	Additions are marked with +.
Line 59:	Line 59:
- The Christian Slate has connections that can lead to successful part time work within a telecommunications company. Employed members will receive commissions and residual income benefits. This ability is consistent with the Christian Democratic philosophy towards creating successful student led businesses at UC Davis.	+ The Christian Slate claims to have connections that can lead to successful part time work within a telecommunications company. Employed members will receive commissions and residual income benefits. This ability is consistent with the Christian Democratic philosophy towards creating successful student led businesses at UC Davis.
Line 61:	Line 61:
- We also want to employ students to work in advertising for the ["The Davis Enforcer"]. If a member of our team successfully gathers advertising they will receive a commission on what they collect and continue to receive a commission for as long as that business continues to advertise with the Davis Enforcer. - - ==New Technology== - - We have the connections necessary to sell cheap cellular telephones as well as free company to company calling. There are thousands of students with cell phones at UC Davis and we can easily lower cell phone bills for all of them. - - We have access to VOIP products which will allow foreign exchange students to cheaply contact friends and family here in the United States. Every call will act as a local call. In addition we will sell off Video Phones allowing people to see and hear who they are talking to. - - We are unique to any business organization because we have access to all classrooms and lecture rooms on the campus. This allows us to make business presentations to students right here in UC Davis. Company Representatives are also members of the Christian Slate which grants personal access to how the products and company work. - - == ASUCD Ballot Measure== - - We are currently creating a team which will organize a Ballot Measure campaign for the Pledge of Allegiance. We are going to start the process in April. - -	+ They also want to employ students to work in advertising for the ["The Davis Enforcer"]. If a member of our team successfully gathers advertising they will receive a commission on what they collect and continue to receive a commission for as long as that business continues to advertise with the Davis Enforcer.
Line 80:	Line 66:
- ------

Christian Democratic Party

SteveOstrowski — 2007-03-05 11:26:53

Revert to version 421 (It's called a clarification process).

Differences for Christian Democratic Party

Deletions are marked with - .	Additions are marked with +.
Line 57:	Line 57:
- They plan to bring a telecommunications business to the student population at ["UC Davis"]. This plan includes but is not limited to employment opportunities for students and the selling of several types of products. In this capacity the Christian Democrats plan to bring speakers, power point discussions, and rallies to the campus. On ["2007"]-02-24, Steve Ostrowski announced this plan in a post to his ["Livejournal"]: "So the solution to ASUCD? A shadow government. I am going to do more for students than any one official in ASUCD. I am going to sell them cell phones at very cheap prices. I am going to sell them cell phone plans that are much cheaper than what they have now. The students in turn can help their parents and friends save as well. I will employ students to spread this business and then within a sort time dominate the student market. These employees at the same time will make it their business to interact with ASUCD and then finally there will be a full CDP slate numbering beyond 6 candidates in November. The bonuses I and others would receive from this would allow us to outspend any particular slate. And if I lose the next election I will still have income from it regardless. So there is hope, and I am not going away ever." -

Christian Democratic Party

EdwinSaada — 2007-03-05 11:07:48

fits in future plans. might as well state their real goal.

Differences for Christian Democratic Party

Deletions are marked with - .	Additions are marked with +.
Line 57:	Line 57:
	+ They plan to bring a telecommunications business to the student population at ["UC Davis"]. This plan includes but is not limited to employment opportunities for students and the selling of several types of products. In this capacity the Christian Democrats plan to bring speakers, power point discussions, and rallies to the campus. On ["2007"]-02-24, Steve Ostrowski announced this plan in a post to his ["Livejournal"]: "So the solution to ASUCD? A shadow government. I am going to do more for students than any one official in ASUCD. I am going to sell them cell phones at very cheap prices. I am going to sell them cell phone plans that are much cheaper than what they have now. The students in turn can help their parents and friends save as well. I will employ students to spread this business and then within a sort time dominate the student market. These employees at the same time will make it their business to interact with ASUCD and then finally there will be a full CDP slate numbering beyond 6 candidates in November. The bonuses I and others would receive from this would allow us to outspend any particular slate. And if I lose the next election I will still have income from it regardless. So there is hope, and I am not going away ever." +

Christian Democratic Party

SteveOstrowski — 2007-03-05 09:34:41

Differences for Christian Democratic Party

Deletions are marked with - .	Additions are marked with +.
Line 57:	Line 57:
- We plan to bring telecommunications business to the student population at ["UC Davis"]. Still includes but is not limited to employment opportunities for students and the selling of several types of products. In this capacity the Christian Democrats will bring speakers, power point discussions, and rallies to the campus.	+ ==Employment for Students== + + The Christian Slate has connections that can lead to successful part time work within a telecommunications company. Employed members will receive commissions and residual income benefits. This ability is consistent with the Christian Democratic philosophy towards creating successful student led businesses at UC Davis. + + We also want to employ students to work in advertising for the ["The Davis Enforcer"]. If a member of our team successfully gathers advertising they will receive a commission on what they collect and continue to receive a commission for as long as that business continues to advertise with the Davis Enforcer. + + ==New Technology== + + We have the connections necessary to sell cheap cellular telephones as well as free company to company calling. There are thousands of students with cell phones at UC Davis and we can easily lower cell phone bills for all of them. + + We have access to VOIP products which will allow foreign exchange students to cheaply contact friends and family here in the United States. Every call will act as a local call. In addition we will sell off Video Phones allowing people to see and hear who they are talking to. + + We are unique to any business organization because we have access to all classrooms and lecture rooms on the campus. This allows us to make business presentations to students right here in UC Davis. Company Representatives are also members of the Christian Slate which grants personal access to how the products and company work. + + == ASUCD Ballot Measure== + + We are currently creating a team which will organize a Ballot Measure campaign for the Pledge of Allegiance. We are going to start the process in April. +

Christian Democratic Party

SteveOstrowski — 2007-03-05 09:33:49

Revert to version 418 (I will change it then to something more specific ).

Differences for Christian Democratic Party

Deletions are marked with - .	Additions are marked with +.
Line 57:	Line 57:
- They plan to bring a telecommunications business to the student population at ["UC Davis"]. This plan includes but is not limited to employment opportunities for students and the selling of several types of products. In this capacity the Christian Democrats plan to bring speakers, power point discussions, and rallies to the campus. On ["2007"]-02-24, Steve Ostrowski announced this plan in a post to his ["Livejournal"]: "So the solution to ASUCD? A shadow government. I am going to do more for students than any one official in ASUCD. I am going to sell them cell phones at very cheap prices. I am going to sell them cell phone plans that are much cheaper than what they have now. The students in turn can help their parents and friends save as well. I will employ students to spread this business and then within a sort time dominate the student market. These employees at the same time will make it their business to interact with ASUCD and then finally there will be a full CDP slate numbering beyond 6 candidates in November. The bonuses I and others would receive from this would allow us to outspend any particular slate. And if I lose the next election I will still have income from it regardless. So there is hope, and I am not going away ever."	+ We plan to bring telecommunications business to the student population at ["UC Davis"]. Still includes but is not limited to employment opportunities for students and the selling of several types of products. In this capacity the Christian Democrats will bring speakers, power point discussions, and rallies to the campus. +

Christian Democratic Party

JabberWokky — 2007-03-05 09:19:16

rm 1st person, readded quote from LJ.

Differences for Christian Democratic Party

Deletions are marked with - .	Additions are marked with +.
Line 57:	Line 57:
- We plan to bring telecommunications business to the student population at ["UC Davis"]. Still includes but is not limited to employment opportunities for students and the selling of several types of products. In this capacity the Christian Democrats will bring speakers, power point discussions, and rallies to the campus. -	+ They plan to bring a telecommunications business to the student population at ["UC Davis"]. This plan includes but is not limited to employment opportunities for students and the selling of several types of products. In this capacity the Christian Democrats plan to bring speakers, power point discussions, and rallies to the campus. On ["2007"]-02-24, Steve Ostrowski announced this plan in a post to his ["Livejournal"]: "So the solution to ASUCD? A shadow government. I am going to do more for students than any one official in ASUCD. I am going to sell them cell phones at very cheap prices. I am going to sell them cell phone plans that are much cheaper than what they have now. The students in turn can help their parents and friends save as well. I will employ students to spread this business and then within a sort time dominate the student market. These employees at the same time will make it their business to interact with ASUCD and then finally there will be a full CDP slate numbering beyond 6 candidates in November. The bonuses I and others would receive from this would allow us to outspend any particular slate. And if I lose the next election I will still have income from it regardless. So there is hope, and I am not going away ever."

Christian Democratic Party

SteveOstrowski — 2007-03-05 09:13:09

Differences for Christian Democratic Party

Deletions are marked with - .	Additions are marked with +.
Line 57:	Line 57:
- On 2007-02-24, Steve Ostrowski posted to his ["Livejournal"]: "So the solution to ASUCD? A shadow government. I am going to do more for students than any one official in ASUCD. I am going to sell them cell phones at very cheap prices. I am going to sell them cell phone plans that are much cheaper than what they have now. The students in turn can help their parents and friends save as well. I will employ students to spread this business and then within a sort time dominate the student market. These employees at the same time will make it their business to interact with ASUCD and then finally there will be a full CDP slate numbering beyond 6 candidates in November. The bonuses I and others would receive from this would allow us to outspend any particular slate. And if I lose the next election I will still have income from it regardless. So there is hope, and I am not going away ever."	+ We plan to bring telecommunications business to the student population at ["UC Davis"]. Still includes but is not limited to employment opportunities for students and the selling of several types of products. In this capacity the Christian Democrats will bring speakers, power point discussions, and rallies to the campus. +

Christian Democratic Party

WilliamLewis — 2007-03-03 20:27:09

Revert to version 415 (The other version is moronic.).

Differences for Christian Democratic Party

Deletions are marked with - .	Additions are marked with +.
Line 7:	Line 7:
- The '''Christian Democratic Party''', formerly the Christian Slate, is a UC Davis SPAC-registered political club currently only has two active, known members, ["Steve Ostrowski"] and ["Ronald Payne"]. Its primary member is ["Steve Ostrowski"]. Total group membership is considered basically just ["Steve Ostrowski"] and a friend or two (although this is debated by Steve, who claims there's a larger "unknown" membership), although at one point the group did contain 5 people who signed as "Officers" in order to register with ["SPAC"]. They consisted of Steve Ostrowski, ["Ronald Payne"], and three others who are according to Steve not aware of the Davis Wiki and have not specifically requested him to add their names to the page. This is unlikely, as election fliers pointed to the DavisWiki (and you're not allowed to post fliers unless you register with SPAC), and virtually all the facebook groups related to the CDP linked to the wiki as their webpage. Most people don't think the officers are were or are still actively involved with this group.	+ The '''Christian Democratic Party''', formerly the Christian Slate, is a UC Davis SPAC-registered political club currently only has two active, known members, ["Steve Ostrowski"] and ["Ronald Payne"]. Its primary member is ["Steve Ostrowski"]. Total group membership is considered basically just ["Steve Ostrowski"] and a friend or two (although this is debated by Steve, who claims there's a larger "unknown" membership), although at one point the group did contain 5 people who signed as "Officers" in order to register with ["SPAC"]. They consisted of Steve Ostrowski, ["Ronald Payne"], and three others who decline to publically affiliate themselves with the group. Most people don't think the officers were or are still actively involved with this group.

Christian Democratic Party

SteveOstrowski — 2007-03-03 19:52:06

Revert to version 414.

Differences for Christian Democratic Party

Deletions are marked with - .	Additions are marked with +.
Line 7:	Line 7:
- The '''Christian Democratic Party''', formerly the Christian Slate, is a UC Davis SPAC-registered political club currently only has two active, known members, ["Steve Ostrowski"] and ["Ronald Payne"]. Its primary member is ["Steve Ostrowski"]. Total group membership is considered basically just ["Steve Ostrowski"] and a friend or two (although this is debated by Steve, who claims there's a larger "unknown" membership), although at one point the group did contain 5 people who signed as "Officers" in order to register with ["SPAC"]. They consisted of Steve Ostrowski, ["Ronald Payne"], and three others who decline to publically affiliate themselves with the group. Most people don't think the officers were or are still actively involved with this group.	+ The '''Christian Democratic Party''', formerly the Christian Slate, is a UC Davis SPAC-registered political club currently only has two active, known members, ["Steve Ostrowski"] and ["Ronald Payne"]. Its primary member is ["Steve Ostrowski"]. Total group membership is considered basically just ["Steve Ostrowski"] and a friend or two (although this is debated by Steve, who claims there's a larger "unknown" membership), although at one point the group did contain 5 people who signed as "Officers" in order to register with ["SPAC"]. They consisted of Steve Ostrowski, ["Ronald Payne"], and three others who are according to Steve not aware of the Davis Wiki and have not specifically requested him to add their names to the page. This is unlikely, as election fliers pointed to the DavisWiki (and you're not allowed to post fliers unless you register with SPAC), and virtually all the facebook groups related to the CDP linked to the wiki as their webpage. Most people don't think the officers are were or are still actively involved with this group.

Christian Democratic Party

JamesSchwab — 2007-03-03 19:13:14

Revert to version 413 (does not even make sense).

Differences for Christian Democratic Party

Deletions are marked with - .	Additions are marked with +.
Line 7:	Line 7:
- The '''Christian Democratic Party''', formerly the Christian Slate, is a UC Davis SPAC-registered political club currently only has two active, known members, ["Steve Ostrowski"] and ["Ronald Payne"]. Its primary member is ["Steve Ostrowski"]. Total group membership is considered basically just ["Steve Ostrowski"] and a friend or two (although this is debated by Steve, who claims there's a larger "unknown" membership), although at one point the group did contain 5 people who signed as "Officers" in order to register with ["SPAC"]. They consisted of Steve Ostrowski, ["Ronald Payne"], and three others who are according to Steve not aware of the Davis Wiki and have not specifically requested him to add their names to the page. This is unlikely, as election fliers pointed to the DavisWiki (and you're not allowed to post fliers unless you register with SPAC), and virtually all the facebook groups related to the CDP linked to the wiki as their webpage. Most people don't think the officers are were or are still actively involved with this group.	+ The '''Christian Democratic Party''', formerly the Christian Slate, is a UC Davis SPAC-registered political club currently only has two active, known members, ["Steve Ostrowski"] and ["Ronald Payne"]. Its primary member is ["Steve Ostrowski"]. Total group membership is considered basically just ["Steve Ostrowski"] and a friend or two (although this is debated by Steve, who claims there's a larger "unknown" membership), although at one point the group did contain 5 people who signed as "Officers" in order to register with ["SPAC"]. They consisted of Steve Ostrowski, ["Ronald Payne"], and three others who decline to publically affiliate themselves with the group. Most people don't think the officers were or are still actively involved with this group.

Christian Democratic Party

SteveOstrowski — 2007-03-03 18:58:12

Revert to version 412.

Differences for Christian Democratic Party

Deletions are marked with - .	Additions are marked with +.
Line 7:	Line 7:
- The '''Christian Democratic Party''', formerly the Christian Slate, is a UC Davis SPAC-registered political club currently only has two active, known members, ["Steve Ostrowski"] and ["Ronald Payne"]. Its primary member is ["Steve Ostrowski"]. Total group membership is considered basically just ["Steve Ostrowski"] and a friend or two (although this is debated by Steve, who claims there's a larger "unknown" membership), although at one point the group did contain 5 people who signed as "Officers" in order to register with ["SPAC"]. They consisted of Steve Ostrowski, ["Ronald Payne"], and three others who decline to publically affiliate themselves with the group. Most people don't think the officers were or are still actively involved with this group.	+ The '''Christian Democratic Party''', formerly the Christian Slate, is a UC Davis SPAC-registered political club currently only has two active, known members, ["Steve Ostrowski"] and ["Ronald Payne"]. Its primary member is ["Steve Ostrowski"]. Total group membership is considered basically just ["Steve Ostrowski"] and a friend or two (although this is debated by Steve, who claims there's a larger "unknown" membership), although at one point the group did contain 5 people who signed as "Officers" in order to register with ["SPAC"]. They consisted of Steve Ostrowski, ["Ronald Payne"], and three others who are according to Steve not aware of the Davis Wiki and have not specifically requested him to add their names to the page. This is unlikely, as election fliers pointed to the DavisWiki (and you're not allowed to post fliers unless you register with SPAC), and virtually all the facebook groups related to the CDP linked to the wiki as their webpage. Most people don't think the officers are were or are still actively involved with this group.

Christian Democratic Party

WilliamLewis — 2007-03-03 01:17:35

Revert to version 409 (No consent needed for mentions on the wiki. Total BS.).

Differences for Christian Democratic Party

Deletions are marked with - .	Additions are marked with +.
Line 7:	Line 7:
- The '''Christian Democratic Party''', formerly the Christian Slate, is a UC Davis SPAC-registered political club currently only has two active, known members, ["Steve Ostrowski"] and ["Ronald Payne"]. Its primary member is ["Steve Ostrowski"]. Total group membership is considered basically just ["Steve Ostrowski"] and a friend or two (although this is debated by Steve, who claims there's a larger "unknown" membership), although at one point the group did contain 5 people who signed as "Officers" in order to register with ["SPAC"]. They consisted of Steve Ostrowski, ["Ronald Payne"], and three others who are according to Steve not aware of the Davis Wiki and have not specifically requested him to add their names to the page. This is unlikely, as election fliers pointed to the DavisWiki (and you're not allowed to post fliers unless you register with SPAC), and virtually all the facebook groups related to the CDP linked to the wiki as their webpage. Most people don't think the officers are were or are still actively involved with this group.	+ The '''Christian Democratic Party''', formerly the Christian Slate, is a UC Davis SPAC-registered political club currently only has two active, known members, ["Steve Ostrowski"] and ["Ronald Payne"]. Its primary member is ["Steve Ostrowski"]. Total group membership is considered basically just ["Steve Ostrowski"] and a friend or two (although this is debated by Steve, who claims there's a larger "unknown" membership), although at one point the group did contain 5 people who signed as "Officers" in order to register with ["SPAC"]. They consisted of Steve Ostrowski, ["Ronald Payne"], and three others who decline to publically affiliate themselves with the group. Most people don't think the officers were or are still actively involved with this group.

Christian Democratic Party

EdwinSaada — 2007-03-03 00:46:59

typo

Differences for Christian Democratic Party

Deletions are marked with - .	Additions are marked with +.
Line 7:	Line 7:
- The '''Christian Democratic Party''', formerly the Christian Slate, is a UC Davis SPAC-registered political club currently only has two active, known members, ["Steve Ostrowski"] and ["Ronald Payne"]. Its primary member is ["Steve Ostrowski"]. Total group membership is considered basically just ["Steve Ostrowski"] and a friend or two (although this is debated by Steve, who claims there's a larger "unknown" membership), although at one point the group did contain 5 people who signed as "Officers" in order to register with ["SPAC"]. They consisted of Steve Ostrowski, ["Ronald Payne"], and three others who are according to Steve not aware of the Davis Wiki and have not specifically requested him to add their names to the page. This is unlikely, as election fliers pointed to the DavisWiki (and you're not allowed to post fliers unless you register with SOAC), and virtually all the facebook groups related to the CDP linked to the wiki as their webpage. Most people don't think the officers are were or are still actively involved with this group.	+ The '''Christian Democratic Party''', formerly the Christian Slate, is a UC Davis SPAC-registered political club currently only has two active, known members, ["Steve Ostrowski"] and ["Ronald Payne"]. Its primary member is ["Steve Ostrowski"]. Total group membership is considered basically just ["Steve Ostrowski"] and a friend or two (although this is debated by Steve, who claims there's a larger "unknown" membership), although at one point the group did contain 5 people who signed as "Officers" in order to register with ["SPAC"]. They consisted of Steve Ostrowski, ["Ronald Payne"], and three others who are according to Steve not aware of the Davis Wiki and have not specifically requested him to add their names to the page. This is unlikely, as election fliers pointed to the DavisWiki (and you're not allowed to post fliers unless you register with SPAC), and virtually all the facebook groups related to the CDP linked to the wiki as their webpage. Most people don't think the officers are were or are still actively involved with this group.

Christian Democratic Party

EdwinSaada — 2007-03-03 00:46:29

fine. adding 'according to steve' but imo it's BS. adding unlikely.

Differences for Christian Democratic Party

Deletions are marked with - .	Additions are marked with +.
Line 7:	Line 7:
- The '''Christian Democratic Party''', formerly the Christian Slate, is a UC Davis SPAC-registered political club currently only has two active, known members, ["Steve Ostrowski"] and ["Ronald Payne"]. Its primary member is ["Steve Ostrowski"]. Total group membership is considered basically just ["Steve Ostrowski"] and a friend or two (although this is debated by Steve, who claims there's a larger "unknown" membership), although at one point the group did contain 5 people who signed as "Officers" in order to register with ["SPAC"]. They consisted of Steve Ostrowski, ["Ronald Payne"], and three others who are not aware of the Davis Wiki and have not specifically requested ["Steve Ostrowski"] to add their names to the page. Most people don't think the officers are were or are still actively involved with this group.	+ The '''Christian Democratic Party''', formerly the Christian Slate, is a UC Davis SPAC-registered political club currently only has two active, known members, ["Steve Ostrowski"] and ["Ronald Payne"]. Its primary member is ["Steve Ostrowski"]. Total group membership is considered basically just ["Steve Ostrowski"] and a friend or two (although this is debated by Steve, who claims there's a larger "unknown" membership), although at one point the group did contain 5 people who signed as "Officers" in order to register with ["SPAC"]. They consisted of Steve Ostrowski, ["Ronald Payne"], and three others who are according to Steve not aware of the Davis Wiki and have not specifically requested him to add their names to the page. This is unlikely, as election fliers pointed to the DavisWiki (and you're not allowed to post fliers unless you register with SOAC), and virtually all the facebook groups related to the CDP linked to the wiki as their webpage. Most people don't think the officers are were or are still actively involved with this group.

Christian Democratic Party

SteveOstrowski — 2007-03-03 00:40:45

Revert to version 407.

Differences for Christian Democratic Party

Deletions are marked with - .	Additions are marked with +.
Line 7:	Line 7:
- The '''Christian Democratic Party''', formerly the Christian Slate, is a UC Davis SPAC-registered political club currently only has two active, known members, ["Steve Ostrowski"] and ["Ronald Payne"]. Its primary member is ["Steve Ostrowski"]. Total group membership is considered basically just ["Steve Ostrowski"] and a friend or two (although this is debated by Steve, who claims there's a larger "unknown" membership), although at one point the group did contain 5 people who signed as "Officers" in order to register with ["SPAC"]. They consisted of Steve Ostrowski, ["Ronald Payne"], and three others who decline to publically affiliate themselves with the group. Most people don't think the officers were or are still actively involved with this group.	+ The '''Christian Democratic Party''', formerly the Christian Slate, is a UC Davis SPAC-registered political club currently only has two active, known members, ["Steve Ostrowski"] and ["Ronald Payne"]. Its primary member is ["Steve Ostrowski"]. Total group membership is considered basically just ["Steve Ostrowski"] and a friend or two (although this is debated by Steve, who claims there's a larger "unknown" membership), although at one point the group did contain 5 people who signed as "Officers" in order to register with ["SPAC"]. They consisted of Steve Ostrowski, ["Ronald Payne"], and three others who are not aware of the Davis Wiki and have not specifically requested ["Steve Ostrowski"] to add their names to the page. Most people don't think the officers are were or are still actively involved with this group.

Christian Democratic Party

MaxMikalonis — 2007-03-02 23:43:13

Differences for Christian Democratic Party

Deletions are marked with - .	Additions are marked with +.
Line 7:	Line 7:
- The '''Christian Democratic Party''', formerly the Christian Slate, is a UC Davis SPAC-registered political club currently only has two active, known members, ["Steve Ostrowski"] and ["Ronald Payne"]. Its primary member is ["Steve Ostrowski"]. Total group membership is considered basically just ["Steve Ostrowski"] and a friend or two (although this is debated by Steve, who claims there's a larger "unknown" membership), although at one point the group did contain 5 people who signed as "Officers" in order to register with ["SPAC"]. They consisted of Steve Ostrowski, ["Ronald Payne"], and three others who decline to publically affiliate themselves with the group. Most people don't think the officers are were or are still actively involved with this group.	+ The '''Christian Democratic Party''', formerly the Christian Slate, is a UC Davis SPAC-registered political club currently only has two active, known members, ["Steve Ostrowski"] and ["Ronald Payne"]. Its primary member is ["Steve Ostrowski"]. Total group membership is considered basically just ["Steve Ostrowski"] and a friend or two (although this is debated by Steve, who claims there's a larger "unknown" membership), although at one point the group did contain 5 people who signed as "Officers" in order to register with ["SPAC"]. They consisted of Steve Ostrowski, ["Ronald Payne"], and three others who decline to publically affiliate themselves with the group. Most people don't think the officers were or are still actively involved with this group.

Christian Democratic Party

EdwinSaada — 2007-03-02 22:19:45

Revert to version 406 (lies. DW was on fliers, every facebookgroup linked to it too. ).

Differences for Christian Democratic Party

Deletions are marked with - .	Additions are marked with +.
Line 7:	Line 7:
- The '''Christian Democratic Party''', formerly the Christian Slate, is a UC Davis SPAC-registered political club currently only has two active, known members, ["Steve Ostrowski"] and ["Ronald Payne"]. Its primary member is ["Steve Ostrowski"]. Total group membership is considered basically just ["Steve Ostrowski"] and a friend or two (although this is debated by Steve, who claims there's a larger "unknown" membership), although at one point the group did contain 5 people who signed as "Officers" in order to register with ["SPAC"]. They consisted of Steve Ostrowski, ["Ronald Payne"], and three others who are not aware of the Davis Wiki and have not specifically requested ["Steve Ostrowski"] to add their names to the page. Most people don't think the officers are were or are still actively involved with this group.	+ The '''Christian Democratic Party''', formerly the Christian Slate, is a UC Davis SPAC-registered political club currently only has two active, known members, ["Steve Ostrowski"] and ["Ronald Payne"]. Its primary member is ["Steve Ostrowski"]. Total group membership is considered basically just ["Steve Ostrowski"] and a friend or two (although this is debated by Steve, who claims there's a larger "unknown" membership), although at one point the group did contain 5 people who signed as "Officers" in order to register with ["SPAC"]. They consisted of Steve Ostrowski, ["Ronald Payne"], and three others who decline to publically affiliate themselves with the group. Most people don't think the officers are were or are still actively involved with this group.

Christian Democratic Party

SteveOstrowski — 2007-03-02 21:38:45

I didn't take out the links, I like links.

Differences for Christian Democratic Party

Deletions are marked with - .	Additions are marked with +.
Line 7:	Line 7:
- The '''Christian Democratic Party''', formerly the Christian Slate, is a UC Davis SPAC-registered political club currently only has two active, known members, ["Steve Ostrowski"] and ["Ronald Payne"]. Its primary member is ["Steve Ostrowski"]. Total group membership is considered basically just ["Steve Ostrowski"] and a friend or two (although this is debated by Steve, who claims there's a larger "unknown" membership), although at one point the group did contain 5 people who signed as "Officers" in order to register with ["SPAC"]. They consisted of Steve Ostrowski, ["Ronald Payne"], and three others who decline to publically affiliate themselves with the group. Most people don't think the officers are were or are still actively involved with this group.	+ The '''Christian Democratic Party''', formerly the Christian Slate, is a UC Davis SPAC-registered political club currently only has two active, known members, ["Steve Ostrowski"] and ["Ronald Payne"]. Its primary member is ["Steve Ostrowski"]. Total group membership is considered basically just ["Steve Ostrowski"] and a friend or two (although this is debated by Steve, who claims there's a larger "unknown" membership), although at one point the group did contain 5 people who signed as "Officers" in order to register with ["SPAC"]. They consisted of Steve Ostrowski, ["Ronald Payne"], and three others who are not aware of the Davis Wiki and have not specifically requested ["Steve Ostrowski"] to add their names to the page. Most people don't think the officers are were or are still actively involved with this group.

Christian Democratic Party

JabberWokky — 2007-03-02 19:39:08

I swear I've linked those before. Leave the damn links in, Steve.

Differences for Christian Democratic Party

Deletions are marked with - .	Additions are marked with +.
Line 9:	Line 9:
- The Christian Democratic Party supported ["Measure K"] and claims to have worked on the Yes on Proposition 85 campaign in Yolo County. This included campaigning in Davis, Woodland, and Winters. (Proposition 85 was similar to Proposition 73, parental notification for minors who want to have an abortion.) What actual support they gave or work they put in is also up for debate, as the visibility of their support and work was very low, and the method of campaigning is unknown.	+ The Christian Democratic Party supported ["Measure K"] and claims to have worked on the Yes on Proposition 85 campaign in ["Yolo County"]. This included campaigning in ["Davis"], ["Woodland"], and ["Winters"]. (Proposition 85 was similar to Proposition 73, parental notification for minors who want to have an abortion.) What actual support they gave or work they put in is also up for debate, as the visibility of their support and work was very low, and the method of campaigning is unknown.

Christian Democratic Party

JabberWokky — 2007-03-02 19:38:06

Christ, that's a bad misspelling.

Differences for Christian Democratic Party

Deletions are marked with - .	Additions are marked with +.
Line 13:	Line 13:
- The mention of a political party with a partly religious agenda has drawn criticisms from those in the community, and a few out of towners, who feel this would be a blow to the separation between church and state. ["Steve Ostrowski"] feels that trying to rally a Christian constituency is no different from rallying any other sort of one - that even if religion is a touchy subject in the modern world. Additionally, some Christians have objected to the party as their platform doesn't reflect Christianity and they feel that the name of Christ is being exploited for political gain. However, some people also say that the CDP uses Chrisitianty to support its non-Christian agenda.	+ The mention of a political party with a partly religious agenda has drawn criticisms from those in the community, and a few out of towners, who feel this would be a blow to the separation between church and state. ["Steve Ostrowski"] feels that trying to rally a Christian constituency is no different from rallying any other sort of one - that even if religion is a touchy subject in the modern world. Additionally, some Christians have objected to the party as their platform doesn't reflect Christianity and they feel that the name of Christ is being exploited for political gain. However, some people also say that the CDP uses Christianity to support its non-Christian agenda.

Christian Democratic Party

JabberWokky — 2007-03-02 19:37:12

Steve, nor them, nor the other officers. Is there a way to pull the SPAC form?

Differences for Christian Democratic Party

Deletions are marked with - .	Additions are marked with +.
Line 7:	Line 7:
- The '''Christian Democratic Party''', formerly the Christian Slate, is a UC Davis SPAC-registered political club currently only has two active, known members, ["Steve Ostrowski"] and ["Ronald Payne"]. Its primary member is ["Steve Ostrowski"]. Total group membership is considered basically just ["Steve Ostrowski"] and a friend or two (although this is debated by Steve, who claims there's a larger "unknown" membership), although at one point the group did contain 5 people who signed as "Officers" in order to register with ["SPAC"]. They consisted of Steve Ostrowski, ["Ronald Payne"], and three others Steve refuses to name. Most people don't think the officers are were or are still actively involved with this group.	+ The '''Christian Democratic Party''', formerly the Christian Slate, is a UC Davis SPAC-registered political club currently only has two active, known members, ["Steve Ostrowski"] and ["Ronald Payne"]. Its primary member is ["Steve Ostrowski"]. Total group membership is considered basically just ["Steve Ostrowski"] and a friend or two (although this is debated by Steve, who claims there's a larger "unknown" membership), although at one point the group did contain 5 people who signed as "Officers" in order to register with ["SPAC"]. They consisted of Steve Ostrowski, ["Ronald Payne"], and three others who decline to publically affiliate themselves with the group. Most people don't think the officers are were or are still actively involved with this group.

Christian Democratic Party

EdwinSaada — 2007-03-02 18:41:25

Differences for Christian Democratic Party

Deletions are marked with - .	Additions are marked with +.
Line 7:	Line 7:
- The '''Christian Democratic Party''', formerly the Christian Slate, is a UC Davis SPAC-registered political club currently only has two active, known members, ["Steve Ostrowski"] and ["Ronald Payne"]. Its primary member is ["Steve Ostrowski"]. Total group membership is considered basically just ["Steve Ostrowski"] and a friend or two (although this is debated by Steve, who claims there's a larger "unknown" membership), although at one point the group did contain 5 people who signed as "Officers" in order to register with ["SPAC"]. They consisted of Steve Ostrowski, ["Ronald Payne"], and three others Steve refuses to name.	+ The '''Christian Democratic Party''', formerly the Christian Slate, is a UC Davis SPAC-registered political club currently only has two active, known members, ["Steve Ostrowski"] and ["Ronald Payne"]. Its primary member is ["Steve Ostrowski"]. Total group membership is considered basically just ["Steve Ostrowski"] and a friend or two (although this is debated by Steve, who claims there's a larger "unknown" membership), although at one point the group did contain 5 people who signed as "Officers" in order to register with ["SPAC"]. They consisted of Steve Ostrowski, ["Ronald Payne"], and three others Steve refuses to name. Most people don't think the officers are were or are still actively involved with this group.

Christian Democratic Party

SteveOstrowski — 2007-03-02 18:40:03

Was never an officer

Differences for Christian Democratic Party

Deletions are marked with - .	Additions are marked with +.
Line 7:	Line 7:
- The '''Christian Democratic Party''', formerly the Christian Slate, is a UC Davis SPAC-registered political club currently only has two active, known members, ["Steve Ostrowski"] and ["Ronald Payne"]. Its primary member is ["Steve Ostrowski"]. Total group membership is considered basically just ["Steve Ostrowski"] and a friend or two (although this is debated by Steve, who claims there's a larger "unknown" membership), although at one point the group did contain 5 people who signed as "Officers" in order to register with ["SPAC"]. They consisted of Steve Ostrowski, ["Ronald Payne"], and three others Steve refuses to name. Most people don't think the officers are actively or still involved with this group, if they ever were, such as one alleged founding member, ["Joseph Bleckman"], who interestingly enough ran in the same two elections the CDP did on a different slate.	+ The '''Christian Democratic Party''', formerly the Christian Slate, is a UC Davis SPAC-registered political club currently only has two active, known members, ["Steve Ostrowski"] and ["Ronald Payne"]. Its primary member is ["Steve Ostrowski"]. Total group membership is considered basically just ["Steve Ostrowski"] and a friend or two (although this is debated by Steve, who claims there's a larger "unknown" membership), although at one point the group did contain 5 people who signed as "Officers" in order to register with ["SPAC"]. They consisted of Steve Ostrowski, ["Ronald Payne"], and three others Steve refuses to name.

Christian Democratic Party

EdwinSaada — 2007-03-02 18:37:21

you're lame. fine.

Differences for Christian Democratic Party

Deletions are marked with - .	Additions are marked with +.
Line 7:	Line 7:
- The '''Christian Democratic Party''', formerly the Christian Slate, is a UC Davis SPAC-registered political club currently only has two active, known members, ["Steve Ostrowski"] and ["Ronald Payne"]. Its primary member is ["Steve Ostrowski"]. Total group membership is considered basically just ["Steve Ostrowski"] and a friend or two (although this is debated by Steve, who claims there's a larger "unknown" membership), although at one point the group did contain 5 people who signed as "Officers" in order to register with ["SPAC"]. They consisted of Steve Ostrowski, ["Ronald Payne"], and three others Steve refuses to name.	+ The '''Christian Democratic Party''', formerly the Christian Slate, is a UC Davis SPAC-registered political club currently only has two active, known members, ["Steve Ostrowski"] and ["Ronald Payne"]. Its primary member is ["Steve Ostrowski"]. Total group membership is considered basically just ["Steve Ostrowski"] and a friend or two (although this is debated by Steve, who claims there's a larger "unknown" membership), although at one point the group did contain 5 people who signed as "Officers" in order to register with ["SPAC"]. They consisted of Steve Ostrowski, ["Ronald Payne"], and three others Steve refuses to name. Most people don't think the officers are actively or still involved with this group, if they ever were, such as one alleged founding member, ["Joseph Bleckman"], who interestingly enough ran in the same two elections the CDP did on a different slate.
Line 9:	Line 9:
- The Christian Democratic Party supported ["Measure K"] and worked on the Yes on Proposition 85 campaign in Yolo County. This included campaigning in Davis, Woodland, and Winters. (Proposition 85 was similar to Proposition 73, parental notification for minors who want to have an abortion.)	+ The Christian Democratic Party supported ["Measure K"] and claims to have worked on the Yes on Proposition 85 campaign in Yolo County. This included campaigning in Davis, Woodland, and Winters. (Proposition 85 was similar to Proposition 73, parental notification for minors who want to have an abortion.) What actual support they gave or work they put in is also up for debate, as the visibility of their support and work was very low, and the method of campaigning is unknown.

Christian Democratic Party

SteveOstrowski — 2007-03-02 18:32:27

Revert to version 395 (Messed up).

Differences for Christian Democratic Party

Deletions are marked with - .	Additions are marked with +.
Line 7:	Line 7:
- The '''Christian Democratic Party''', formerly the Christian Slate, is a UC Davis SPAC-registered political club currently only has two active, known members, ["Steve Ostrowski"], the primary member and founder, and ["Ronald Payne"] his friend/roommate. Although at one point the group did contain 5 people who signed as "Officers" in order to register with ["SPAC"]. They consisted of Steve Ostrowski, ["Ronald Payne"], ["Joseph Bleckman"], two others Steve refuses to name. These chartering members are not necessarily still involved. In fact, they may never have been, evidenced by Joseph Bleckman running as an Independent (Not CDP) in the CDP's ["Fall 2006 ASUCD Election" first election.]	+ The '''Christian Democratic Party''', formerly the Christian Slate, is a UC Davis SPAC-registered political club currently only has two active, known members, ["Steve Ostrowski"] and ["Ronald Payne"]. Its primary member is ["Steve Ostrowski"]. Total group membership is considered basically just ["Steve Ostrowski"] and a friend or two (although this is debated by Steve, who claims there's a larger "unknown" membership), although at one point the group did contain 5 people who signed as "Officers" in order to register with ["SPAC"]. They consisted of Steve Ostrowski, ["Ronald Payne"], and three others Steve refuses to name.
Line 9:	Line 9:
- The Christian Democratic Party supported ["Measure K"] and worked on the Yes on Proposition 85 campaign in Yolo County. This included campaigning in Davis, Woodland, and Winters. (Proposition 85 was similar to Proposition 73, parental notification for minors who want to have an abortion.) What acutal support they gave or work they put in is also up for debate, as the visibility of their support and work was very low.	+ The Christian Democratic Party supported ["Measure K"] and worked on the Yes on Proposition 85 campaign in Yolo County. This included campaigning in Davis, Woodland, and Winters. (Proposition 85 was similar to Proposition 73, parental notification for minors who want to have an abortion.)
Line 13:	Line 13:
- The mention of a political party with a partly religious agenda has drawn criticisms from those in the community, and a few out of towners, who feel this would be a blow to the separation between church and state. ["Steve Ostorwksi"] feels that trying to rally a Christian constituency is no different from rallying any other sort of one - that even if religion is a touchy subject in the modern world. Additionally, some Christians have objected to the party as their platform doesn't reflect Christianity and they feel that the name of Christ is being exploited for political gain. However, some people also say that the CDP uses Chrisitianty to support its non-Christian agenda.	+ The mention of a political party with a partly religious agenda has drawn criticisms from those in the community, and a few out of towners, who feel this would be a blow to the separation between church and state. ["Steve Ostrowski"] feels that trying to rally a Christian constituency is no different from rallying any other sort of one - that even if religion is a touchy subject in the modern world. Additionally, some Christians have objected to the party as their platform doesn't reflect Christianity and they feel that the name of Christ is being exploited for political gain. However, some people also say that the CDP uses Chrisitianty to support its non-Christian agenda.

Christian Democratic Party

SteveOstrowski — 2007-03-02 18:32:04

Revert to version 396 (Again, not accurate. ).

Differences for Christian Democratic Party

Deletions are marked with - .	Additions are marked with +.
Line 13:	Line 13:
- The mention of a political party with a partly religious agenda has drawn criticisms from those in the community, and a few out of towners, who feel this would be a blow to the separation between church and state. ["Steve Ostrowksi"] feels that trying to rally a Christian constituency is no different from rallying any other sort of one - that even if religion is a touchy subject in the modern world. Additionally, some Christians have objected to the party as their platform doesn't reflect Christianity and they feel that the name of Christ is being exploited for political gain. However, some people also say that the CDP uses Chrisitianty to support its non-Christian agenda.	+ The mention of a political party with a partly religious agenda has drawn criticisms from those in the community, and a few out of towners, who feel this would be a blow to the separation between church and state. ["Steve Ostorwksi"] feels that trying to rally a Christian constituency is no different from rallying any other sort of one - that even if religion is a touchy subject in the modern world. Additionally, some Christians have objected to the party as their platform doesn't reflect Christianity and they feel that the name of Christ is being exploited for political gain. However, some people also say that the CDP uses Chrisitianty to support its non-Christian agenda.
Line 78:	Line 78:
- -------

Christian Democratic Party

EdwinSaada — 2007-03-02 18:31:56

moving to talk.

Differences for Christian Democratic Party

Deletions are marked with - .	Additions are marked with +.
Line 79:	Line 79:
- 'What acutal support they gave or work they put in is also up for debate, as the visibility of their support and work was very low." I think that should defintely remain in the entry. Saying "we supported" is lame and takes credit for who knows what. What did you support? How? Making a facebook group? I asked months ago, what has been done ''off of the internet or facebook''. Really Steve, why not just ADD info to the entry? sotp trying to be all vague and take credit and puff it up. Also, I'm pretty sure it was said on earlier versions somewhere or other JB was an officer, I seem to recall it on facebook too. I don't understand why you are deleting that part about officers, or not filling in. Just name the officers. Pretend to be a real, legitimate group. This is the point of the wiki, to add real info. You know it, I think it's really lame you continually refuse to contribute it. -["EdwinSaada" ES]

Christian Democratic Party

EdwinSaada — 2007-03-02 18:29:17

fixing the typo you fixed, adding explanation

Differences for Christian Democratic Party

Deletions are marked with - .	Additions are marked with +.
Line 13:	Line 13:
- The mention of a political party with a partly religious agenda has drawn criticisms from those in the community, and a few out of towners, who feel this would be a blow to the separation between church and state. ["Steve Ostorwksi"] feels that trying to rally a Christian constituency is no different from rallying any other sort of one - that even if religion is a touchy subject in the modern world. Additionally, some Christians have objected to the party as their platform doesn't reflect Christianity and they feel that the name of Christ is being exploited for political gain. However, some people also say that the CDP uses Chrisitianty to support its non-Christian agenda.	+ The mention of a political party with a partly religious agenda has drawn criticisms from those in the community, and a few out of towners, who feel this would be a blow to the separation between church and state. ["Steve Ostrowksi"] feels that trying to rally a Christian constituency is no different from rallying any other sort of one - that even if religion is a touchy subject in the modern world. Additionally, some Christians have objected to the party as their platform doesn't reflect Christianity and they feel that the name of Christ is being exploited for political gain. However, some people also say that the CDP uses Chrisitianty to support its non-Christian agenda.
Line 78:	Line 78:
	+ ------- + 'What acutal support they gave or work they put in is also up for debate, as the visibility of their support and work was very low." I think that should defintely remain in the entry. Saying "we supported" is lame and takes credit for who knows what. What did you support? How? Making a facebook group? I asked months ago, what has been done ''off of the internet or facebook''. Really Steve, why not just ADD info to the entry? sotp trying to be all vague and take credit and puff it up. Also, I'm pretty sure it was said on earlier versions somewhere or other JB was an officer, I seem to recall it on facebook too. I don't understand why you are deleting that part about officers, or not filling in. Just name the officers. Pretend to be a real, legitimate group. This is the point of the wiki, to add real info. You know it, I think it's really lame you continually refuse to contribute it. -["EdwinSaada" ES]

Christian Democratic Party

EdwinSaada — 2007-03-02 18:25:20

Revert to version 394 (reverting, hold on a sec i'll add explanation to entry.).

Differences for Christian Democratic Party

Deletions are marked with - .	Additions are marked with +.
Line 7:	Line 7:
- The '''Christian Democratic Party''', formerly the Christian Slate, is a UC Davis SPAC-registered political club currently only has two active, known members, ["Steve Ostrowski"] and ["Ronald Payne"]. Its primary member is ["Steve Ostrowski"]. Total group membership is considered basically just ["Steve Ostrowski"] and a friend or two (although this is debated by Steve, who claims there's a larger "unknown" membership), although at one point the group did contain 5 people who signed as "Officers" in order to register with ["SPAC"]. They consisted of Steve Ostrowski, ["Ronald Payne"], and three others Steve refuses to name.	+ The '''Christian Democratic Party''', formerly the Christian Slate, is a UC Davis SPAC-registered political club currently only has two active, known members, ["Steve Ostrowski"], the primary member and founder, and ["Ronald Payne"] his friend/roommate. Although at one point the group did contain 5 people who signed as "Officers" in order to register with ["SPAC"]. They consisted of Steve Ostrowski, ["Ronald Payne"], ["Joseph Bleckman"], two others Steve refuses to name. These chartering members are not necessarily still involved. In fact, they may never have been, evidenced by Joseph Bleckman running as an Independent (Not CDP) in the CDP's ["Fall 2006 ASUCD Election" first election.]
Line 9:	Line 9:
- The Christian Democratic Party supported ["Measure K"] and worked on the Yes on Proposition 85 campaign in Yolo County. This included campaigning in Davis, Woodland, and Winters. (Proposition 85 was similar to Proposition 73, parental notification for minors who want to have an abortion.)	+ The Christian Democratic Party supported ["Measure K"] and worked on the Yes on Proposition 85 campaign in Yolo County. This included campaigning in Davis, Woodland, and Winters. (Proposition 85 was similar to Proposition 73, parental notification for minors who want to have an abortion.) What acutal support they gave or work they put in is also up for debate, as the visibility of their support and work was very low.
Line 13:	Line 13:
- The mention of a political party with a partly religious agenda has drawn criticisms from those in the community, and a few out of towners, who feel this would be a blow to the separation between church and state. ["Steve Ostrowski"] feels that trying to rally a Christian constituency is no different from rallying any other sort of one - that even if religion is a touchy subject in the modern world. Additionally, some Christians have objected to the party as their platform doesn't reflect Christianity and they feel that the name of Christ is being exploited for political gain. However, some people also say that the CDP uses Chrisitianty to support its non-Christian agenda.	+ The mention of a political party with a partly religious agenda has drawn criticisms from those in the community, and a few out of towners, who feel this would be a blow to the separation between church and state. ["Steve Ostorwksi"] feels that trying to rally a Christian constituency is no different from rallying any other sort of one - that even if religion is a touchy subject in the modern world. Additionally, some Christians have objected to the party as their platform doesn't reflect Christianity and they feel that the name of Christ is being exploited for political gain. However, some people also say that the CDP uses Chrisitianty to support its non-Christian agenda.

Christian Democratic Party

SteveOstrowski — 2007-03-02 18:20:43

Revert to version 393 (Just becase you don't know, doesn't mean you can speculate ).

Differences for Christian Democratic Party

Deletions are marked with - .	Additions are marked with +.
Line 7:	Line 7:
- The '''Christian Democratic Party''', formerly the Christian Slate, is a UC Davis SPAC-registered political club currently only has two active, known members, ["Steve Ostrowski"], the primary member and founder, and ["Ronald Payne"] his friend/roommate. Although at one point the group did contain 5 people who signed as "Officers" in order to register with ["SPAC"]. They consisted of Steve Ostrowski, ["Ronald Payne"], ["Joseph Bleckman"], two others Steve refuses to name. These chartering members are not necessarily still involved. In fact, they may never have been, evidenced by Joseph Bleckman running as an Independent (Not CDP) in the CDP's ["Fall 2006 ASUCD Election" first election.]	+ The '''Christian Democratic Party''', formerly the Christian Slate, is a UC Davis SPAC-registered political club currently only has two active, known members, ["Steve Ostrowski"] and ["Ronald Payne"]. Its primary member is ["Steve Ostrowski"]. Total group membership is considered basically just ["Steve Ostrowski"] and a friend or two (although this is debated by Steve, who claims there's a larger "unknown" membership), although at one point the group did contain 5 people who signed as "Officers" in order to register with ["SPAC"]. They consisted of Steve Ostrowski, ["Ronald Payne"], and three others Steve refuses to name.
Line 9:	Line 9:
- The Christian Democratic Party supported ["Measure K"] and worked on the Yes on Proposition 85 campaign in Yolo County. This included campaigning in Davis, Woodland, and Winters. (Proposition 85 was similar to Proposition 73, parental notification for minors who want to have an abortion.) What acutal support they gave or work they put in is also up for debate, as the visibility of their support and work was very low.	+ The Christian Democratic Party supported ["Measure K"] and worked on the Yes on Proposition 85 campaign in Yolo County. This included campaigning in Davis, Woodland, and Winters. (Proposition 85 was similar to Proposition 73, parental notification for minors who want to have an abortion.)
Line 13:	Line 13:
- The mention of a political party with a partly religious agenda has drawn criticisms from those in the community, and a few out of towners, who feel this would be a blow to the separation between church and state. ["Steve Ostorwksi"] feels that trying to rally a Christian constituency is no different from rallying any other sort of one - that even if religion is a touchy subject in the modern world. Additionally, some Christians have objected to the party as their platform doesn't reflect Christianity and they feel that the name of Christ is being exploited for political gain. However, some people also say that the CDP uses Chrisitianty to support its non-Christian agenda.	+ The mention of a political party with a partly religious agenda has drawn criticisms from those in the community, and a few out of towners, who feel this would be a blow to the separation between church and state. ["Steve Ostrowski"] feels that trying to rally a Christian constituency is no different from rallying any other sort of one - that even if religion is a touchy subject in the modern world. Additionally, some Christians have objected to the party as their platform doesn't reflect Christianity and they feel that the name of Christ is being exploited for political gain. However, some people also say that the CDP uses Chrisitianty to support its non-Christian agenda.

Christian Democratic Party

EdwinSaada — 2007-03-02 18:16:38

Revert to version 392 (your group, try to pretend its legit, why not just ADD the other officer names? ).

Differences for Christian Democratic Party

Deletions are marked with - .	Additions are marked with +.
Line 7:	Line 7:
- The '''Christian Democratic Party''', formerly the Christian Slate, is a UC Davis SPAC-registered political club currently only has two active, known members, ["Steve Ostrowski"] and ["Ronald Payne"]. Its primary member is ["Steve Ostrowski"]. Total group membership is considered basically just ["Steve Ostrowski"] and a friend or two (although this is debated by Steve, who claims there's a larger "unknown" membership), although at one point the group did contain 5 people who signed as "Officers" in order to register with ["SPAC"]. They consisted of Steve Ostrowski, ["Ronald Payne"], and three others Steve refuses to name.	+ The '''Christian Democratic Party''', formerly the Christian Slate, is a UC Davis SPAC-registered political club currently only has two active, known members, ["Steve Ostrowski"], the primary member and founder, and ["Ronald Payne"] his friend/roommate. Although at one point the group did contain 5 people who signed as "Officers" in order to register with ["SPAC"]. They consisted of Steve Ostrowski, ["Ronald Payne"], ["Joseph Bleckman"], two others Steve refuses to name. These chartering members are not necessarily still involved. In fact, they may never have been, evidenced by Joseph Bleckman running as an Independent (Not CDP) in the CDP's ["Fall 2006 ASUCD Election" first election.]
Line 9:	Line 9:
- The Christian Democratic Party supported ["Measure K"] and worked on the Yes on Proposition 85 campaign in Yolo County. This included campaigning in Davis, Woodland, and Winters. (Proposition 85 was similar to Proposition 73, parental notification for minors who want to have an abortion.)	+ The Christian Democratic Party supported ["Measure K"] and worked on the Yes on Proposition 85 campaign in Yolo County. This included campaigning in Davis, Woodland, and Winters. (Proposition 85 was similar to Proposition 73, parental notification for minors who want to have an abortion.) What acutal support they gave or work they put in is also up for debate, as the visibility of their support and work was very low.
Line 13:	Line 13:
- The mention of a political party with a partly religious agenda has drawn criticisms from those in the community, and a few out of towners, who feel this would be a blow to the separation between church and state. ["Steve Ostrowski"] feels that trying to rally a Christian constituency is no different from rallying any other sort of one - that even if religion is a touchy subject in the modern world. Additionally, some Christians have objected to the party as their platform doesn't reflect Christianity and they feel that the name of Christ is being exploited for political gain. However, some people also say that the CDP uses Chrisitianty to support its non-Christian agenda.	+ The mention of a political party with a partly religious agenda has drawn criticisms from those in the community, and a few out of towners, who feel this would be a blow to the separation between church and state. ["Steve Ostorwksi"] feels that trying to rally a Christian constituency is no different from rallying any other sort of one - that even if religion is a touchy subject in the modern world. Additionally, some Christians have objected to the party as their platform doesn't reflect Christianity and they feel that the name of Christ is being exploited for political gain. However, some people also say that the CDP uses Chrisitianty to support its non-Christian agenda.

Christian Democratic Party

SteveOstrowski — 2007-03-02 18:01:35

Revert to version 391 (I did correct it).

Differences for Christian Democratic Party

Deletions are marked with - .	Additions are marked with +.
Line 7:	Line 7:
- The '''Christian Democratic Party''', formerly the Christian Slate, is a UC Davis SPAC-registered political club currently only has two active, known members, ["Steve Ostrowski"], the primary member and founder, and ["Ronald Payne"] his friend/roommate. Although at one point the group did contain 5 people who signed as "Officers" in order to register with ["SPAC"]. They consisted of Steve Ostrowski, ["Ronald Payne"], ["Joseph Bleckman"], two others Steve refuses to name. These chartering members are not necessarily still involved. In fact, they may never have been, evidenced by Joseph Bleckman running as an Independent (Not CDP) in the CDP's ["Fall 2006 ASUCD Election" first election.]	+ The '''Christian Democratic Party''', formerly the Christian Slate, is a UC Davis SPAC-registered political club currently only has two active, known members, ["Steve Ostrowski"] and ["Ronald Payne"]. Its primary member is ["Steve Ostrowski"]. Total group membership is considered basically just ["Steve Ostrowski"] and a friend or two (although this is debated by Steve, who claims there's a larger "unknown" membership), although at one point the group did contain 5 people who signed as "Officers" in order to register with ["SPAC"]. They consisted of Steve Ostrowski, ["Ronald Payne"], and three others Steve refuses to name.
Line 9:	Line 9:
- The Christian Democratic Party supported ["Measure K"] and worked on the Yes on Proposition 85 campaign in Yolo County. This included campaigning in Davis, Woodland, and Winters. (Proposition 85 was similar to Proposition 73, parental notification for minors who want to have an abortion.) What acutal support they gave or work they put in is also up for debate, as the visibility of their support and work was very low.	+ The Christian Democratic Party supported ["Measure K"] and worked on the Yes on Proposition 85 campaign in Yolo County. This included campaigning in Davis, Woodland, and Winters. (Proposition 85 was similar to Proposition 73, parental notification for minors who want to have an abortion.)
Line 13:	Line 13:
- The mention of a political party with a partly religious agenda has drawn criticisms from those in the community, and a few out of towners, who feel this would be a blow to the separation between church and state. ["Steve Ostorwksi"] feels that trying to rally a Christian constituency is no different from rallying any other sort of one - that even if religion is a touchy subject in the modern world. Additionally, some Christians have objected to the party as their platform doesn't reflect Christianity and they feel that the name of Christ is being exploited for political gain. However, some people also say that the CDP uses Chrisitianty to support its non-Christian agenda.	+ The mention of a political party with a partly religious agenda has drawn criticisms from those in the community, and a few out of towners, who feel this would be a blow to the separation between church and state. ["Steve Ostrowski"] feels that trying to rally a Christian constituency is no different from rallying any other sort of one - that even if religion is a touchy subject in the modern world. Additionally, some Christians have objected to the party as their platform doesn't reflect Christianity and they feel that the name of Christ is being exploited for political gain. However, some people also say that the CDP uses Chrisitianty to support its non-Christian agenda.

Christian Democratic Party

WilliamLewis — 2007-03-02 18:01:19

Revert to version 390 (Correct it, don't delete it.).

Differences for Christian Democratic Party

Deletions are marked with - .	Additions are marked with +.
Line 7:	Line 7:
- The '''Christian Democratic Party''', formerly the Christian Slate, is a UC Davis SPAC-registered political club currently only has two active, known members, ["Steve Ostrowski"] and ["Ronald Payne"]. Its primary member is ["Steve Ostrowski"]. Total group membership is considered basically just ["Steve Ostrowski"] and a friend or two (although this is debated by Steve, who claims there's a larger "unknown" membership), although at one point the group did contain 5 people who signed as "Officers" in order to register with ["SPAC"]. They consisted of Steve Ostrowski, ["Ronald Payne"], and three others Steve refuses to name.	+ The '''Christian Democratic Party''', formerly the Christian Slate, is a UC Davis SPAC-registered political club currently only has two active, known members, ["Steve Ostrowski"], the primary member and founder, and ["Ronald Payne"] his friend/roommate. Although at one point the group did contain 5 people who signed as "Officers" in order to register with ["SPAC"]. They consisted of Steve Ostrowski, ["Ronald Payne"], ["Joseph Bleckman"], two others Steve refuses to name. These chartering members are not necessarily still involved. In fact, they may never have been, evidenced by Joseph Bleckman running as an Independent (Not CDP) in the CDP's ["Fall 2006 ASUCD Election" first election.]
Line 9:	Line 9:
- The Christian Democratic Party supported ["Measure K"] and worked on the Yes on Proposition 85 campaign in Yolo County. This included campaigning in Davis, Woodland, and Winters. (Proposition 85 was similar to Proposition 73, parental notification for minors who want to have an abortion.)	+ The Christian Democratic Party supported ["Measure K"] and worked on the Yes on Proposition 85 campaign in Yolo County. This included campaigning in Davis, Woodland, and Winters. (Proposition 85 was similar to Proposition 73, parental notification for minors who want to have an abortion.) What acutal support they gave or work they put in is also up for debate, as the visibility of their support and work was very low.
Line 13:	Line 13:
- The mention of a political party with a partly religious agenda has drawn criticisms from those in the community, and a few out of towners, who feel this would be a blow to the separation between church and state. ["Steve Ostrowski"] feels that trying to rally a Christian constituency is no different from rallying any other sort of one - that even if religion is a touchy subject in the modern world. Additionally, some Christians have objected to the party as their platform doesn't reflect Christianity and they feel that the name of Christ is being exploited for political gain. However, some people also say that the CDP uses Chrisitianty to support its non-Christian agenda.	+ The mention of a political party with a partly religious agenda has drawn criticisms from those in the community, and a few out of towners, who feel this would be a blow to the separation between church and state. ["Steve Ostorwksi"] feels that trying to rally a Christian constituency is no different from rallying any other sort of one - that even if religion is a touchy subject in the modern world. Additionally, some Christians have objected to the party as their platform doesn't reflect Christianity and they feel that the name of Christ is being exploited for political gain. However, some people also say that the CDP uses Chrisitianty to support its non-Christian agenda.

Christian Democratic Party

SteveOstrowski — 2007-03-02 18:00:37

Revert to version 388 (You guys have a lot of misinformation ).

Differences for Christian Democratic Party

Deletions are marked with - .	Additions are marked with +.
Line 7:	Line 7:
- The '''Christian Democratic Party''', formerly the Christian Slate, is a UC Davis SPAC-registered political club currently only has two active, known members, ["Steve Ostrowski"], the primary member and founder, and ["Ronald Payne"] his friend/roommate. Although at one point the group did contain 5 people who signed as "Officers" in order to register with ["SPAC"]. They consisted of Steve Ostrowski, ["Ronald Payne"], ["Joseph Bleckman"], two others Steve refuses to name. These chartering members are not necessarily still involved. In fact, they may never have been, evidenced by Joseph Bleckman running as an Independent (Not CDP) in the CDP's ["Fall 2006 ASUCD Election" first election.]	+ The '''Christian Democratic Party''', formerly the Christian Slate, is a UC Davis SPAC-registered political club currently only has two active, known members, ["Steve Ostrowski"] and ["Ronald Payne"]. Its primary member is ["Steve Ostrowski"]. Total group membership is considered basically just ["Steve Ostrowski"] and a friend or two (although this is debated by Steve, who claims there's a larger "unknown" membership), although at one point the group did contain 5 people who signed as "Officers" in order to register with ["SPAC"]. They consisted of Steve Ostrowski, ["Ronald Payne"], and three others Steve refuses to name.
Line 9:	Line 9:
- The Christian Democratic Party supported ["Measure K"] and worked on the Yes on Proposition 85 campaign in Yolo County. This included campaigning in Davis, Woodland, and Winters. (Proposition 85 was similar to Proposition 73, parental notification for minors who want to have an abortion.) What acutal support they gave or work they put in is also up for debate, as the visibility of their support and work was very low.	+ The Christian Democratic Party supported ["Measure K"] and worked on the Yes on Proposition 85 campaign in Yolo County. This included campaigning in Davis, Woodland, and Winters. (Proposition 85 was similar to Proposition 73, parental notification for minors who want to have an abortion.)
Line 13:	Line 13:
- The mention of a political party with a partly religious agenda has drawn criticisms from those in the community, and a few out of towners, who feel this would be a blow to the separation between church and state. ["Steve Ostorwksi"] feels that trying to rally a Christian constituency is no different from rallying any other sort of one - that even if religion is a touchy subject in the modern world. Additionally, some Christians have objected to the party as their platform doesn't reflect Christianity and they feel that the name of Christ is being exploited for political gain. However, some people also say that the CDP uses Chrisitianty to support its non-Christian agenda.	+ The mention of a political party with a partly religious agenda has drawn criticisms from those in the community, and a few out of towners, who feel this would be a blow to the separation between church and state. ["Steve Ostrowski"] feels that trying to rally a Christian constituency is no different from rallying any other sort of one - that even if religion is a touchy subject in the modern world. Additionally, some Christians have objected to the party as their platform doesn't reflect Christianity and they feel that the name of Christ is being exploited for political gain. However, some people also say that the CDP uses Chrisitianty to support its non-Christian agenda.

Christian Democratic Party

EdwinSaada — 2007-03-02 18:00:33

there was edit conflict, refixing my edit.

Differences for Christian Democratic Party

Deletions are marked with - .	Additions are marked with +.
Line 7:	Line 7:
- The '''Christian Democratic Party''', formerly the Christian Slate, is a UC Davis SPAC-registered political club currently only has two active, known members, ["Steve Ostrowski"] and ["Ronald Payne"]. Its primary member is ["Steve Ostrowski"]. Total group membership is considered basically just ["Steve Ostrowski"] and a friend or two (although this is debated by Steve, who claims there's a larger "unknown" membership), although at one point the group did contain 5 people who signed as "Officers" in order to register with ["SPAC"]. They consisted of Steve Ostrowski, ["Ronald Payne"], ["Joseph Bleckman"], two others Steve refuses to name. These chartering members are not necessarily still involved. In fact, they may never have been, evidenced by Joseph Bleckman running as an Independent (Not CDP) in the CDP's ["Fall 2006 ASUCD Election" first election.]	+ The '''Christian Democratic Party''', formerly the Christian Slate, is a UC Davis SPAC-registered political club currently only has two active, known members, ["Steve Ostrowski"], the primary member and founder, and ["Ronald Payne"] his friend/roommate. Although at one point the group did contain 5 people who signed as "Officers" in order to register with ["SPAC"]. They consisted of Steve Ostrowski, ["Ronald Payne"], ["Joseph Bleckman"], two others Steve refuses to name. These chartering members are not necessarily still involved. In fact, they may never have been, evidenced by Joseph Bleckman running as an Independent (Not CDP) in the CDP's ["Fall 2006 ASUCD Election" first election.]

Christian Democratic Party

WilliamLewis — 2007-03-02 17:59:37

Revert to version 384 (Geeze, not this again.).

Differences for Christian Democratic Party

Deletions are marked with - .	Additions are marked with +.
Line 7:	Line 7:
- The '''Christian Democratic Party''', formerly the Christian Slate, is a UC Davis SPAC-registered political club currently only has two active, known members, ["Steve Ostrowski"] and ["Ronald Payne"]. Its primary member is ["Steve Ostrowski"]. Total group membership is considered basically just ["Steve Ostrowski"] and a friend or two (although this is debated by Steve, who claims there's a larger "unknown" membership), although at one point the group did contain 5 people who signed as "Officers" in order to register with ["SPAC"]. They consisted of Steve Ostrowski, ["Ronald Payne"], and three others Steve refuses to name.	+ The '''Christian Democratic Party''', formerly the Christian Slate, is a UC Davis SPAC-registered political club currently only has two active, known members, ["Steve Ostrowski"] and ["Ronald Payne"]. Its primary member is ["Steve Ostrowski"]. Total group membership is considered basically just ["Steve Ostrowski"] and a friend or two (although this is debated by Steve, who claims there's a larger "unknown" membership), although at one point the group did contain 5 people who signed as "Officers" in order to register with ["SPAC"]. They consisted of Steve Ostrowski, ["Ronald Payne"], ["Joseph Bleckman"], two others Steve refuses to name. These chartering members are not necessarily still involved. In fact, they may never have been, evidenced by Joseph Bleckman running as an Independent (Not CDP) in the CDP's ["Fall 2006 ASUCD Election" first election.]
Line 9:	Line 9:
- The Christian Democratic Party supported ["Measure K"] and worked on the Yes on Proposition 85 campaign in Yolo County. This included campaigning in Davis, Woodland, and Winters. (Proposition 85 was similar to Proposition 73, parental notification for minors who want to have an abortion.)	+ The Christian Democratic Party supported ["Measure K"] and worked on the Yes on Proposition 85 campaign in Yolo County. This included campaigning in Davis, Woodland, and Winters. (Proposition 85 was similar to Proposition 73, parental notification for minors who want to have an abortion.) What acutal support they gave or work they put in is also up for debate, as the visibility of their support and work was very low.
Line 13:	Line 13:
- The mention of a political party with a partly religious agenda has drawn criticisms from those in the community, and a few out of towners, who feel this would be a blow to the separation between church and state. ["Steve Ostrowski"] feels that trying to rally a Christian constituency is no different from rallying any other sort of one - that even if religion is a touchy subject in the modern world. Additionally, some Christians have objected to the party as their platform doesn't reflect Christianity and they feel that the name of Christ is being exploited for political gain. However, some people also say that the CDP uses Chrisitianty to support its non-Christian agenda.	+ The mention of a political party with a partly religious agenda has drawn criticisms from those in the community, and a few out of towners, who feel this would be a blow to the separation between church and state. ["Steve Ostorwksi"] feels that trying to rally a Christian constituency is no different from rallying any other sort of one - that even if religion is a touchy subject in the modern world. Additionally, some Christians have objected to the party as their platform doesn't reflect Christianity and they feel that the name of Christ is being exploited for political gain. However, some people also say that the CDP uses Chrisitianty to support its non-Christian agenda.

Christian Democratic Party

SteveOstrowski — 2007-03-02 17:58:48

Revert to version 386 (it's a mess).

Differences for Christian Democratic Party

Deletions are marked with - .	Additions are marked with +.
Line 7:	Line 7:
- ----- /!\ Edit conflict! Other version: ----- - The '''Christian Democratic Party''', formerly the Christian Slate, is a UC Davis SPAC-registered political club currently only has two active, known members, ["Steve Ostrowski"], the primary member/founder and ["Ronald Payne"], his friend/roommate. Although at one point the group did contain 5 people who signed as "Officers" in order to register with ["SPAC"]. They were Steve Ostrowski, ["Ronald Payne"], ["Joseph Bleckman"], two others Steve refuses to name. These chartering members are not necessarily still involved. In fact, they may never have been, evidenced by Joseph Bleckman running as an Independent (Not CDP) in the CDP's ["Fall 2006 ASUCD Election" first election.] - ----- /!\ Edit conflict! Your version: -----
Line 11:	Line 8:
- ----- /!\ End of edit conflict -----

Christian Democratic Party

EdwinSaada — 2007-03-02 17:58:23

undoing my edit, it was redundant. with the sentence above

Differences for Christian Democratic Party

Deletions are marked with - .	Additions are marked with +.
Line 7:	Line 7:
	+ ----- /!\ Edit conflict! Other version: ----- + The '''Christian Democratic Party''', formerly the Christian Slate, is a UC Davis SPAC-registered political club currently only has two active, known members, ["Steve Ostrowski"], the primary member/founder and ["Ronald Payne"], his friend/roommate. Although at one point the group did contain 5 people who signed as "Officers" in order to register with ["SPAC"]. They were Steve Ostrowski, ["Ronald Payne"], ["Joseph Bleckman"], two others Steve refuses to name. These chartering members are not necessarily still involved. In fact, they may never have been, evidenced by Joseph Bleckman running as an Independent (Not CDP) in the CDP's ["Fall 2006 ASUCD Election" first election.] + ----- /!\ Edit conflict! Your version: -----
Line 8:	Line 11:
	+ ----- /!\ End of edit conflict -----

Christian Democratic Party

SteveOstrowski — 2007-03-02 17:57:49

Differences for Christian Democratic Party

Deletions are marked with - .	Additions are marked with +.
Line 13:	Line 13:
- The mention of a political party with a partly religious agenda has drawn criticisms from those in the community, and a few out of towners, who feel this would be a blow to the separation between church and state. ["Steve Ostrowksi"] feels that trying to rally a Christian constituency is no different from rallying any other sort of one - that even if religion is a touchy subject in the modern world. Additionally, some Christians have objected to the party as their platform doesn't reflect Christianity and they feel that the name of Christ is being exploited for political gain. However, some people also say that the CDP uses Chrisitianty to support its non-Christian agenda.	+ The mention of a political party with a partly religious agenda has drawn criticisms from those in the community, and a few out of towners, who feel this would be a blow to the separation between church and state. ["Steve Ostrowski"] feels that trying to rally a Christian constituency is no different from rallying any other sort of one - that even if religion is a touchy subject in the modern world. Additionally, some Christians have objected to the party as their platform doesn't reflect Christianity and they feel that the name of Christ is being exploited for political gain. However, some people also say that the CDP uses Chrisitianty to support its non-Christian agenda.

Christian Democratic Party

SteveOstrowski — 2007-03-02 17:57:32

Differences for Christian Democratic Party

Deletions are marked with - .	Additions are marked with +.
Line 7:	Line 7:
- The '''Christian Democratic Party''', formerly the Christian Slate, is a UC Davis SPAC-registered political club currently only has two active, known members, ["Steve Ostrowski"] and ["Ronald Payne"]. Its primary member is ["Steve Ostrowski"]. Total group membership is considered basically just ["Steve Ostrowski"] and a friend or two (although this is debated by Steve, who claims there's a larger "unknown" membership), although at one point the group did contain 5 people who signed as "Officers" in order to register with ["SPAC"]. They consisted of Steve Ostrowski, ["Ronald Payne"], ["Joseph Bleckman"], two others Steve refuses to name. These chartering members are not necessarily still involved. In fact, they may never have been, evidenced by Joseph Bleckman running as an Independent (Not CDP) in the CDP's ["Fall 2006 ASUCD Election" first election.]	+ The '''Christian Democratic Party''', formerly the Christian Slate, is a UC Davis SPAC-registered political club currently only has two active, known members, ["Steve Ostrowski"] and ["Ronald Payne"]. Its primary member is ["Steve Ostrowski"]. Total group membership is considered basically just ["Steve Ostrowski"] and a friend or two (although this is debated by Steve, who claims there's a larger "unknown" membership), although at one point the group did contain 5 people who signed as "Officers" in order to register with ["SPAC"]. They consisted of Steve Ostrowski, ["Ronald Payne"], and three others Steve refuses to name.
Line 9:	Line 9:
- The Christian Democratic Party supported ["Measure K"] and worked on the Yes on Proposition 85 campaign in Yolo County. This included campaigning in Davis, Woodland, and Winters. (Proposition 85 was similar to Proposition 73, parental notification for minors who want to have an abortion.) What acutal support they gave or work they put in is also up for debate, as the visibility of their support and work was very low.	+ The Christian Democratic Party supported ["Measure K"] and worked on the Yes on Proposition 85 campaign in Yolo County. This included campaigning in Davis, Woodland, and Winters. (Proposition 85 was similar to Proposition 73, parental notification for minors who want to have an abortion.)
Line 13:	Line 13:
- The mention of a political party with a partly religious agenda has drawn criticisms from those in the community, and a few out of towners, who feel this would be a blow to the separation between church and state. ["Steve Ostorwksi"] feels that trying to rally a Christian constituency is no different from rallying any other sort of one - that even if religion is a touchy subject in the modern world. Additionally, some Christians have objected to the party as their platform doesn't reflect Christianity and they feel that the name of Christ is being exploited for political gain. However, some people also say that the CDP uses Chrisitianty to support its non-Christian agenda.	+ The mention of a political party with a partly religious agenda has drawn criticisms from those in the community, and a few out of towners, who feel this would be a blow to the separation between church and state. ["Steve Ostrowksi"] feels that trying to rally a Christian constituency is no different from rallying any other sort of one - that even if religion is a touchy subject in the modern world. Additionally, some Christians have objected to the party as their platform doesn't reflect Christianity and they feel that the name of Christ is being exploited for political gain. However, some people also say that the CDP uses Chrisitianty to support its non-Christian agenda.

Christian Democratic Party

EdwinSaada — 2007-03-02 17:53:32

come of it. the SPAC thing is all it had. and even that was a farce

Differences for Christian Democratic Party

Deletions are marked with - .	Additions are marked with +.
Line 7:	Line 7:
- The '''Christian Democratic Party''', formerly the Christian Slate, is a UC Davis SPAC-registered political club currently only has two active, known members, ["Steve Ostrowski"] and ["Ronald Payne"]. Its primary member is ["Steve Ostrowski"]. Total group membership is debated, although at one point the group did contain 5 Officers in order to register with ["SPAC"]. They consisted of Steve Ostrowski, ["Ronald Payne"], ["Joseph Bleckman"], two others. These chartering members are not necessarily still involved in the organization. In fact, they may never have been, evidenced by Joseph Bleckman running as an Independent (Not CDP) in the CDP's ["Fall 2006 ASUCD Election" first election.]	+ The '''Christian Democratic Party''', formerly the Christian Slate, is a UC Davis SPAC-registered political club currently only has two active, known members, ["Steve Ostrowski"] and ["Ronald Payne"]. Its primary member is ["Steve Ostrowski"]. Total group membership is considered basically just ["Steve Ostrowski"] and a friend or two (although this is debated by Steve, who claims there's a larger "unknown" membership), although at one point the group did contain 5 people who signed as "Officers" in order to register with ["SPAC"]. They consisted of Steve Ostrowski, ["Ronald Payne"], ["Joseph Bleckman"], two others Steve refuses to name. These chartering members are not necessarily still involved. In fact, they may never have been, evidenced by Joseph Bleckman running as an Independent (Not CDP) in the CDP's ["Fall 2006 ASUCD Election" first election.]
Line 75:	Line 75:
	+ * SPAC needs real requirements, imo. -["EdwinSaada" ES]

Christian Democratic Party

JamesSchwab — 2007-03-02 15:57:03

Differences for Christian Democratic Party

Deletions are marked with - .	Additions are marked with +.
Line 7:	Line 7:
- The '''Christian Democratic Party''', formerly the Christian Slate, is a UC Davis SPAC-registered political club that is composed of representatives from various ["Spiritual Organizations" Christian religious denominations]. Its primary member is ["Steve Ostrowski"]. Total group membership is debated, although at one point the group did contain 5 Officers in order to register with ["SPAC"]. They consisted of Steve Ostrowski, ["Ronald Payne"], ["Joseph Bleckman"], two others. These chartering members are not necessarily still involved in the organization. In fact, they may never have been, evidenced by Joseph Bleckman running as an Independent (Not CDP) in the CDP's ["Fall 2006 ASUCD Election" first election.]	+ The '''Christian Democratic Party''', formerly the Christian Slate, is a UC Davis SPAC-registered political club currently only has two active, known members, ["Steve Ostrowski"] and ["Ronald Payne"]. Its primary member is ["Steve Ostrowski"]. Total group membership is debated, although at one point the group did contain 5 Officers in order to register with ["SPAC"]. They consisted of Steve Ostrowski, ["Ronald Payne"], ["Joseph Bleckman"], two others. These chartering members are not necessarily still involved in the organization. In fact, they may never have been, evidenced by Joseph Bleckman running as an Independent (Not CDP) in the CDP's ["Fall 2006 ASUCD Election" first election.]
Line 9:	Line 9:
- The Christian Democratic Party supported ["Measure K"] and worked on the Yes on Proposition 85 campaign in Yolo County. This included campaigning in Davis, Woodland, and Winters. (Proposition 85 was similar to Proposition 73, parental notification for minors who want to have an abortion.)	+ The Christian Democratic Party supported ["Measure K"] and worked on the Yes on Proposition 85 campaign in Yolo County. This included campaigning in Davis, Woodland, and Winters. (Proposition 85 was similar to Proposition 73, parental notification for minors who want to have an abortion.) What acutal support they gave or work they put in is also up for debate, as the visibility of their support and work was very low.
Line 11:	Line 11:
- The Christian Democratic Party was supposedly going to organize donations, food drives, and fundraising for charity.	+ The Christian Democratic Party was supposedly going to organize donations, food drives, and fundraising for charity, but has yet to organize a single event.
Line 13:	Line 13:
- The mention of a political party with a partly religious agenda has drawn criticisms from those in the community, and a few out of towners, who feel this would be a blow to the separation between church and state. Those on the side of the slate feel that trying to rally a Christian constituency is no different from rallying any other sort of one - that even if religion is a touchy subject in the modern world. Additionally, some Christians have objected to the party as their platform doesn't reflect Christianity and they feel that the name of Christ is being exploited for political gain.	+ The mention of a political party with a partly religious agenda has drawn criticisms from those in the community, and a few out of towners, who feel this would be a blow to the separation between church and state. ["Steve Ostorwksi"] feels that trying to rally a Christian constituency is no different from rallying any other sort of one - that even if religion is a touchy subject in the modern world. Additionally, some Christians have objected to the party as their platform doesn't reflect Christianity and they feel that the name of Christ is being exploited for political gain. However, some people also say that the CDP uses Chrisitianty to support its non-Christian agenda.
Line 15:	Line 15:
- Flag: The [wiki:wikipedia:Flag_of_Slovakia Flag of Slovakia] with the patriarchal cross of the Coat of Arms of Slovakia reduced to a crux ordinaria. Catholic and Christian icons combined to show unity within the Christian community. The Christian icon is the blue for royalty and red for the martyrs with the cross. The Vatican flag details the keys of St. Peter. Officially the party's colors are Blue and Red.	+ Flag: The [wiki:wikipedia:Flag_of_Slovakia Flag of Slovakia] with the patriarchal cross of the Coat of Arms of Slovakia reduced to a crux ordinaria. Catholic and Christian icons combined to show unity within the Christian community. The Christian icon is the blue for royalty and red for the martyrs with the cross. The Vatican flag details the keys of St. Peter. The CDP's colors are Blue and Red.

Christian Democratic Party

KarlMogel — 2007-03-02 15:32:48

Comment added.

Differences for Christian Democratic Party

Deletions are marked with - .	Additions are marked with +.
Line 75:	Line 75:
	+ ------ + ''2007-03-02 15:32:48'' [[nbsp]] Confirmed - registered SPAC. --["KarlMogel"]

Christian Democratic Party

JabberWokky — 2007-03-02 14:50:47

Comment added.

Differences for Christian Democratic Party

Deletions are marked with - .	Additions are marked with +.
Line 73:	Line 73:
	+ ------ + ''2007-03-02 14:50:47'' [[nbsp]] If they are a registered SPAC group, they should have an entry. Add their inactivity and visibility issues to the entry if need be. --["JabberWokky"]

Christian Democratic Party

SteveOstrowski — 2007-03-02 14:46:03

Comment added.

Differences for Christian Democratic Party

Deletions are marked with - .	Additions are marked with +.
Line 71:	Line 71:
	+ ------ + ''2007-03-02 14:46:03'' [[nbsp]] We are a SPAC group, leave it alone. It doesn't matter how much or less we do. --["SteveOstrowski"]

Christian Democratic Party

CarlosOverstreet — 2007-03-02 14:44:37

Comment added.

Differences for Christian Democratic Party

Deletions are marked with - .	Additions are marked with +.
Line 69:	Line 69:
	+ ------ + ''2007-03-02 14:44:37'' [[nbsp]] First off, you have a flag, that walks the line of copyright issues... all you did was delete off one portion of the cross and slap your group's title on the flag and claimed it as yours. The campaigning was close to nill for the aforementioned propositions and until I was actually voting, I didn't see anything before (exluding internet sources) to show that this party existed or even fielded candidates. --["CarlosOverstreet"]

Christian Democratic Party

KarlMogel — 2007-03-02 14:44:22

Comment added.

Differences for Christian Democratic Party

Deletions are marked with - .	Additions are marked with +.
Line 67:	Line 67:
	+ ------ + ''2007-03-02 14:44:22'' [[nbsp]] I'm not sure deleting this page is necessarily the right course of action. Perhaps keeping it for historical reasons and making note of its demise on this page? If it is deleted, some of the relevant info should be moved to ["Steve Ostrowski"]'s public page. Since the "party" was pretty much Steve himself, that would be apt. --["KarlMogel"]

Christian Democratic Party

SteveOstrowski — 2007-03-02 14:38:17

Revert to version 375 (back off).

Differences for Christian Democratic Party

Deletions are marked with - .	Additions are marked with +.
Line 1:	Line 1:
- deleted	+ [[Image(Sol.JPG, right, thumbnail, "The Christian Democratic flag, the [wiki:wikipedia:Flag_of_Slovakia Flag of Slovakia] with a cross reduced and yellow text introduced on the second and third horizontal fields. ")]] + \|\|<bgcolor='#E0E0FF'>'''Website'''\|\| + \|\|[http://ucdavis.facebook.com/group_profile.php?gid=11150 Facebook page], only available to ["Facebook"] members.\|\| + \|\|<bgcolor='#E0E0FF'>'''Party Speaker'''\|\| + \|\|["SteveOstrowski" Steven Ostrowski]\|\| + + The '''Christian Democratic Party''', formerly the Christian Slate, is a UC Davis SPAC-registered political club that is composed of representatives from various ["Spiritual Organizations" Christian religious denominations]. Its primary member is ["Steve Ostrowski"]. Total group membership is debated, although at one point the group did contain 5 Officers in order to register with ["SPAC"]. They consisted of Steve Ostrowski, ["Ronald Payne"], ["Joseph Bleckman"], two others. These chartering members are not necessarily still involved in the organization. In fact, they may never have been, evidenced by Joseph Bleckman running as an Independent (Not CDP) in the CDP's ["Fall 2006 ASUCD Election" first election.] + + The Christian Democratic Party supported ["Measure K"] and worked on the Yes on Proposition 85 campaign in Yolo County. This included campaigning in Davis, Woodland, and Winters. (Proposition 85 was similar to Proposition 73, parental notification for minors who want to have an abortion.) + + The Christian Democratic Party was supposedly going to organize donations, food drives, and fundraising for charity. + + The mention of a political party with a partly religious agenda has drawn criticisms from those in the community, and a few out of towners, who feel this would be a blow to the separation between church and state. Those on the side of the slate feel that trying to rally a Christian constituency is no different from rallying any other sort of one - that even if religion is a touchy subject in the modern world. Additionally, some Christians have objected to the party as their platform doesn't reflect Christianity and they feel that the name of Christ is being exploited for political gain. + + Flag: The [wiki:wikipedia:Flag_of_Slovakia Flag of Slovakia] with the patriarchal cross of the Coat of Arms of Slovakia reduced to a crux ordinaria. Catholic and Christian icons combined to show unity within the Christian community. The Christian icon is the blue for royalty and red for the martyrs with the cross. The Vatican flag details the keys of St. Peter. Officially the party's colors are Blue and Red. + + Anthem: Imperial March + + Pledge of Allegiance: Lord's Prayer aka "Our Father." + + [[TableOfContents]] + + = Purpose Statement = + + '''This group was designed to explore the possibility of creating a Christian political party on campus, an opposition party to ["LEAD"] dominance in ["ASUCD"] government, and to provide a new political force in Davis. The purpose of this political party is to do a number of things.''' + + 1. To advance the Christian Democratic agenda in the ["ASUCD"] government with the eventual control of the ["Senate"], Executive, Courts, and committees. + + 2. To create more awareness of the ["ASUCD"] system. Historically, the voter turnout has been lower than 10%. This party wants to work to encourage a dramatic increase in that turnout. + + 3. To provide debate and discussion within the Christian community. + + 4. To promote local, state, national, and international campaigns relevant to Christians along with charitable programs. + + While this political party does invoke the name of Christian in order to unite and provide discussion within the Christian community, they claim that non-Christians are welcome to join the party in all of its functions. As is shown by their repeated offers to get Jewish students to run for Senate with them as well as the presence of a couple of atheists in its early leadership structure. + + "You, the members with your input will determine the direction and platform of this party." + + =AS Papers Publication= + + The Christian Democratic Party publishes the ["The Davis Enforcer"]. + + = ASUCD Platform = + + See ["Christian Slate/platform"]. + + =Fall Election Results 2006= + + ["Kirk Cowgill"] was the slate's first candidate to run for a seat in the ["ASUCD Senate"]. He received only 56 out of 3621 first place votes (1.6%). He was by far the least preferred candidate, being eliminated in the first round in the ["Choice Voting"] system and receiving 174 last place (#17 out of 17 candidates) votes, which was far more than any other candidate. Two of the six candidates the party endorsed (["Eric Friedman"] and ["Mara Harris"]) were elected to Senate. + + =Winter Election Results 2007= + + ["Ronald Payne"] was the slate's second candidate to run for a seat in the ["ASUCD Senate"]. He received 60 out of 4,374 first place votes and was eliminated in the second round. + + = Future Plans = + + On 2007-02-24, Steve Ostrowski posted to his ["Livejournal"]: "So the solution to ASUCD? A shadow government. I am going to do more for students than any one official in ASUCD. I am going to sell them cell phones at very cheap prices. I am going to sell them cell phone plans that are much cheaper than what they have now. The students in turn can help their parents and friends save as well. I will employ students to spread this business and then within a sort time dominate the student market. These employees at the same time will make it their business to interact with ASUCD and then finally there will be a full CDP slate numbering beyond 6 candidates in November. The bonuses I and others would receive from this would allow us to outspend any particular slate. And if I lose the next election I will still have income from it regardless. So there is hope, and I am not going away ever." + + [[Comments]] + ------ + ''2006-11-08 23:55:12'' [[nbsp]] I didn't see anyone campaigning for yes on 85 anywhere in Davis...and Yolo county also rejected the amendment by a 25.6% margin --["TylerFelix"] + ------ + ------ + ''2007-02-24 00:57:59'' [[nbsp]] I'd like to see something more come out of this other than political nonsense... --["CarlosOverstreet"] + ------ + ''2007-02-25 22:15:58'' [[nbsp]] Oh man, sometimes coming back and reading the wiki really makes my day. Man! Selling cell phones. I never would have thought of that. --["JillWeinstein"]

Christian Democratic Party

CarlosOverstreet — 2007-03-02 14:36:51

Page deleted (stay deleted)

Differences for Christian Democratic Party

Deletions are marked with - .	Additions are marked with +.
Line 1:	Line 1:
- [[Image(Sol.JPG, right, thumbnail, "The Christian Democratic flag, the [wiki:wikipedia:Flag_of_Slovakia Flag of Slovakia] with a cross reduced and yellow text introduced on the second and third horizontal fields. ")]] - \|\|<bgcolor='#E0E0FF'>'''Website'''\|\| - \|\|[http://ucdavis.facebook.com/group_profile.php?gid=11150 Facebook page], only available to ["Facebook"] members.\|\| - \|\|<bgcolor='#E0E0FF'>'''Party Speaker'''\|\| - \|\|["SteveOstrowski" Steven Ostrowski]\|\| - - The '''Christian Democratic Party''', formerly the Christian Slate, is a UC Davis SPAC-registered political club that is composed of representatives from various ["Spiritual Organizations" Christian religious denominations]. Its primary member is ["Steve Ostrowski"]. Total group membership is debated, although at one point the group did contain 5 Officers in order to register with ["SPAC"]. They consisted of Steve Ostrowski, ["Ronald Payne"], ["Joseph Bleckman"], two others. These chartering members are not necessarily still involved in the organization. In fact, they may never have been, evidenced by Joseph Bleckman running as an Independent (Not CDP) in the CDP's ["Fall 2006 ASUCD Election" first election.] - - The Christian Democratic Party supported ["Measure K"] and worked on the Yes on Proposition 85 campaign in Yolo County. This included campaigning in Davis, Woodland, and Winters. (Proposition 85 was similar to Proposition 73, parental notification for minors who want to have an abortion.) - - The Christian Democratic Party was supposedly going to organize donations, food drives, and fundraising for charity. - - The mention of a political party with a partly religious agenda has drawn criticisms from those in the community, and a few out of towners, who feel this would be a blow to the separation between church and state. Those on the side of the slate feel that trying to rally a Christian constituency is no different from rallying any other sort of one - that even if religion is a touchy subject in the modern world. Additionally, some Christians have objected to the party as their platform doesn't reflect Christianity and they feel that the name of Christ is being exploited for political gain. - - Flag: The [wiki:wikipedia:Flag_of_Slovakia Flag of Slovakia] with the patriarchal cross of the Coat of Arms of Slovakia reduced to a crux ordinaria. Catholic and Christian icons combined to show unity within the Christian community. The Christian icon is the blue for royalty and red for the martyrs with the cross. The Vatican flag details the keys of St. Peter. Officially the party's colors are Blue and Red. - - Anthem: Imperial March - - Pledge of Allegiance: Lord's Prayer aka "Our Father." - - [[TableOfContents]] - - = Purpose Statement = - - '''This group was designed to explore the possibility of creating a Christian political party on campus, an opposition party to ["LEAD"] dominance in ["ASUCD"] government, and to provide a new political force in Davis. The purpose of this political party is to do a number of things.''' - - 1. To advance the Christian Democratic agenda in the ["ASUCD"] government with the eventual control of the ["Senate"], Executive, Courts, and committees. - - 2. To create more awareness of the ["ASUCD"] system. Historically, the voter turnout has been lower than 10%. This party wants to work to encourage a dramatic increase in that turnout. - - 3. To provide debate and discussion within the Christian community. - - 4. To promote local, state, national, and international campaigns relevant to Christians along with charitable programs. - - While this political party does invoke the name of Christian in order to unite and provide discussion within the Christian community, they claim that non-Christians are welcome to join the party in all of its functions. As is shown by their repeated offers to get Jewish students to run for Senate with them as well as the presence of a couple of atheists in its early leadership structure. - - "You, the members with your input will determine the direction and platform of this party." - - =AS Papers Publication= - - The Christian Democratic Party publishes the ["The Davis Enforcer"]. - - = ASUCD Platform = - - See ["Christian Slate/platform"]. - - =Fall Election Results 2006= - - ["Kirk Cowgill"] was the slate's first candidate to run for a seat in the ["ASUCD Senate"]. He received only 56 out of 3621 first place votes (1.6%). He was by far the least preferred candidate, being eliminated in the first round in the ["Choice Voting"] system and receiving 174 last place (#17 out of 17 candidates) votes, which was far more than any other candidate. Two of the six candidates the party endorsed (["Eric Friedman"] and ["Mara Harris"]) were elected to Senate. - - =Winter Election Results 2007= - - ["Ronald Payne"] was the slate's second candidate to run for a seat in the ["ASUCD Senate"]. He received 60 out of 4,374 first place votes and was eliminated in the second round. - - = Future Plans = - - On 2007-02-24, Steve Ostrowski posted to his ["Livejournal"]: "So the solution to ASUCD? A shadow government. I am going to do more for students than any one official in ASUCD. I am going to sell them cell phones at very cheap prices. I am going to sell them cell phone plans that are much cheaper than what they have now. The students in turn can help their parents and friends save as well. I will employ students to spread this business and then within a sort time dominate the student market. These employees at the same time will make it their business to interact with ASUCD and then finally there will be a full CDP slate numbering beyond 6 candidates in November. The bonuses I and others would receive from this would allow us to outspend any particular slate. And if I lose the next election I will still have income from it regardless. So there is hope, and I am not going away ever." - - [[Comments]] - ------ - ''2006-11-08 23:55:12'' [[nbsp]] I didn't see anyone campaigning for yes on 85 anywhere in Davis...and Yolo county also rejected the amendment by a 25.6% margin --["TylerFelix"] - ------ - ------ - ''2007-02-24 00:57:59'' [[nbsp]] I'd like to see something more come out of this other than political nonsense... --["CarlosOverstreet"] - ------ - ''2007-02-25 22:15:58'' [[nbsp]] Oh man, sometimes coming back and reading the wiki really makes my day. Man! Selling cell phones. I never would have thought of that. --["JillWeinstein"]	+ deleted

Christian Democratic Party

SteveOstrowski — 2007-03-02 14:35:36

Revert to version 373.

Differences for Christian Democratic Party

Deletions are marked with - .	Additions are marked with +.
Line 1:	Line 1:
- deleted	+ [[Image(Sol.JPG, right, thumbnail, "The Christian Democratic flag, the [wiki:wikipedia:Flag_of_Slovakia Flag of Slovakia] with a cross reduced and yellow text introduced on the second and third horizontal fields. ")]] + \|\|<bgcolor='#E0E0FF'>'''Website'''\|\| + \|\|[http://ucdavis.facebook.com/group_profile.php?gid=11150 Facebook page], only available to ["Facebook"] members.\|\| + \|\|<bgcolor='#E0E0FF'>'''Party Speaker'''\|\| + \|\|["SteveOstrowski" Steven Ostrowski]\|\| + + The '''Christian Democratic Party''', formerly the Christian Slate, is a UC Davis SPAC-registered political club that is composed of representatives from various ["Spiritual Organizations" Christian religious denominations]. Its primary member is ["Steve Ostrowski"]. Total group membership is debated, although at one point the group did contain 5 Officers in order to register with ["SPAC"]. They consisted of Steve Ostrowski, ["Ronald Payne"], ["Joseph Bleckman"], two others. These chartering members are not necessarily still involved in the organization. In fact, they may never have been, evidenced by Joseph Bleckman running as an Independent (Not CDP) in the CDP's ["Fall 2006 ASUCD Election" first election.] + + The Christian Democratic Party supported ["Measure K"] and worked on the Yes on Proposition 85 campaign in Yolo County. This included campaigning in Davis, Woodland, and Winters. (Proposition 85 was similar to Proposition 73, parental notification for minors who want to have an abortion.) + + The Christian Democratic Party was supposedly going to organize donations, food drives, and fundraising for charity. + + The mention of a political party with a partly religious agenda has drawn criticisms from those in the community, and a few out of towners, who feel this would be a blow to the separation between church and state. Those on the side of the slate feel that trying to rally a Christian constituency is no different from rallying any other sort of one - that even if religion is a touchy subject in the modern world. Additionally, some Christians have objected to the party as their platform doesn't reflect Christianity and they feel that the name of Christ is being exploited for political gain. + + Flag: The [wiki:wikipedia:Flag_of_Slovakia Flag of Slovakia] with the patriarchal cross of the Coat of Arms of Slovakia reduced to a crux ordinaria. Catholic and Christian icons combined to show unity within the Christian community. The Christian icon is the blue for royalty and red for the martyrs with the cross. The Vatican flag details the keys of St. Peter. Officially the party's colors are Blue and Red. + + Anthem: Imperial March + + Pledge of Allegiance: Lord's Prayer aka "Our Father." + + [[TableOfContents]] + + = Purpose Statement = + + '''This group was designed to explore the possibility of creating a Christian political party on campus, an opposition party to ["LEAD"] dominance in ["ASUCD"] government, and to provide a new political force in Davis. The purpose of this political party is to do a number of things.''' + + 1. To advance the Christian Democratic agenda in the ["ASUCD"] government with the eventual control of the ["Senate"], Executive, Courts, and committees. + + 2. To create more awareness of the ["ASUCD"] system. Historically, the voter turnout has been lower than 10%. This party wants to work to encourage a dramatic increase in that turnout. + + 3. To provide debate and discussion within the Christian community. + + 4. To promote local, state, national, and international campaigns relevant to Christians along with charitable programs. + + While this political party does invoke the name of Christian in order to unite and provide discussion within the Christian community, they claim that non-Christians are welcome to join the party in all of its functions. As is shown by their repeated offers to get Jewish students to run for Senate with them as well as the presence of a couple of atheists in its early leadership structure. + + "You, the members with your input will determine the direction and platform of this party." + + =AS Papers Publication= + + The Christian Democratic Party publishes the ["The Davis Enforcer"]. + + = ASUCD Platform = + + See ["Christian Slate/platform"]. + + =Fall Election Results 2006= + + ["Kirk Cowgill"] was the slate's first candidate to run for a seat in the ["ASUCD Senate"]. He received only 56 out of 3621 first place votes (1.6%). He was by far the least preferred candidate, being eliminated in the first round in the ["Choice Voting"] system and receiving 174 last place (#17 out of 17 candidates) votes, which was far more than any other candidate. Two of the six candidates the party endorsed (["Eric Friedman"] and ["Mara Harris"]) were elected to Senate. + + =Winter Election Results 2007= + + ["Ronald Payne"] was the slate's second candidate to run for a seat in the ["ASUCD Senate"]. He received 60 out of 4,374 first place votes and was eliminated in the second round. + + = Future Plans = + + On 2007-02-24, Steve Ostrowski posted to his ["Livejournal"]: "So the solution to ASUCD? A shadow government. I am going to do more for students than any one official in ASUCD. I am going to sell them cell phones at very cheap prices. I am going to sell them cell phone plans that are much cheaper than what they have now. The students in turn can help their parents and friends save as well. I will employ students to spread this business and then within a sort time dominate the student market. These employees at the same time will make it their business to interact with ASUCD and then finally there will be a full CDP slate numbering beyond 6 candidates in November. The bonuses I and others would receive from this would allow us to outspend any particular slate. And if I lose the next election I will still have income from it regardless. So there is hope, and I am not going away ever." + + [[Comments]] + ------ + ''2006-11-08 23:55:12'' [[nbsp]] I didn't see anyone campaigning for yes on 85 anywhere in Davis...and Yolo county also rejected the amendment by a 25.6% margin --["TylerFelix"] + ------ + ------ + ''2007-02-24 00:57:59'' [[nbsp]] I'd like to see something more come out of this other than political nonsense... --["CarlosOverstreet"] + ------ + ''2007-02-25 22:15:58'' [[nbsp]] Oh man, sometimes coming back and reading the wiki really makes my day. Man! Selling cell phones. I never would have thought of that. --["JillWeinstein"]

Christian Democratic Party

CarlosOverstreet — 2007-03-02 14:27:57

Page deleted (This page is pointless now. This party(group) is de facto dead. )

Differences for Christian Democratic Party

Deletions are marked with - .	Additions are marked with +.
Line 1:	Line 1:
- [[Image(Sol.JPG, right, thumbnail, "The Christian Democratic flag, the [wiki:wikipedia:Flag_of_Slovakia Flag of Slovakia] with a cross reduced and yellow text introduced on the second and third horizontal fields. ")]] - \|\|<bgcolor='#E0E0FF'>'''Website'''\|\| - \|\|[http://ucdavis.facebook.com/group_profile.php?gid=11150 Facebook page], only available to ["Facebook"] members.\|\| - \|\|<bgcolor='#E0E0FF'>'''Party Speaker'''\|\| - \|\|["SteveOstrowski" Steven Ostrowski]\|\| - - The '''Christian Democratic Party''', formerly the Christian Slate, is a UC Davis SPAC-registered political club that is composed of representatives from various ["Spiritual Organizations" Christian religious denominations]. Its primary member is ["Steve Ostrowski"]. Total group membership is debated, although at one point the group did contain 5 Officers in order to register with ["SPAC"]. They consisted of Steve Ostrowski, ["Ronald Payne"], ["Joseph Bleckman"], two others. These chartering members are not necessarily still involved in the organization. In fact, they may never have been, evidenced by Joseph Bleckman running as an Independent (Not CDP) in the CDP's ["Fall 2006 ASUCD Election" first election.] - - The Christian Democratic Party supported ["Measure K"] and worked on the Yes on Proposition 85 campaign in Yolo County. This included campaigning in Davis, Woodland, and Winters. (Proposition 85 was similar to Proposition 73, parental notification for minors who want to have an abortion.) - - The Christian Democratic Party was supposedly going to organize donations, food drives, and fundraising for charity. - - The mention of a political party with a partly religious agenda has drawn criticisms from those in the community, and a few out of towners, who feel this would be a blow to the separation between church and state. Those on the side of the slate feel that trying to rally a Christian constituency is no different from rallying any other sort of one - that even if religion is a touchy subject in the modern world. Additionally, some Christians have objected to the party as their platform doesn't reflect Christianity and they feel that the name of Christ is being exploited for political gain. - - Flag: The [wiki:wikipedia:Flag_of_Slovakia Flag of Slovakia] with the patriarchal cross of the Coat of Arms of Slovakia reduced to a crux ordinaria. Catholic and Christian icons combined to show unity within the Christian community. The Christian icon is the blue for royalty and red for the martyrs with the cross. The Vatican flag details the keys of St. Peter. Officially the party's colors are Blue and Red. - - Anthem: Imperial March - - Pledge of Allegiance: Lord's Prayer aka "Our Father." - - [[TableOfContents]] - - = Purpose Statement = - - '''This group was designed to explore the possibility of creating a Christian political party on campus, an opposition party to ["LEAD"] dominance in ["ASUCD"] government, and to provide a new political force in Davis. The purpose of this political party is to do a number of things.''' - - 1. To advance the Christian Democratic agenda in the ["ASUCD"] government with the eventual control of the ["Senate"], Executive, Courts, and committees. - - 2. To create more awareness of the ["ASUCD"] system. Historically, the voter turnout has been lower than 10%. This party wants to work to encourage a dramatic increase in that turnout. - - 3. To provide debate and discussion within the Christian community. - - 4. To promote local, state, national, and international campaigns relevant to Christians along with charitable programs. - - While this political party does invoke the name of Christian in order to unite and provide discussion within the Christian community, they claim that non-Christians are welcome to join the party in all of its functions. As is shown by their repeated offers to get Jewish students to run for Senate with them as well as the presence of a couple of atheists in its early leadership structure. - - "You, the members with your input will determine the direction and platform of this party." - - =AS Papers Publication= - - The Christian Democratic Party publishes the ["The Davis Enforcer"]. - - = ASUCD Platform = - - See ["Christian Slate/platform"]. - - =Fall Election Results 2006= - - ["Kirk Cowgill"] was the slate's first candidate to run for a seat in the ["ASUCD Senate"]. He received only 56 out of 3621 first place votes (1.6%). He was by far the least preferred candidate, being eliminated in the first round in the ["Choice Voting"] system and receiving 174 last place (#17 out of 17 candidates) votes, which was far more than any other candidate. Two of the six candidates the party endorsed (["Eric Friedman"] and ["Mara Harris"]) were elected to Senate. - - =Winter Election Results 2007= - - ["Ronald Payne"] was the slate's second candidate to run for a seat in the ["ASUCD Senate"]. He received 60 out of 4,374 first place votes and was eliminated in the second round. - - = Future Plans = - - On 2007-02-24, Steve Ostrowski posted to his ["Livejournal"]: "So the solution to ASUCD? A shadow government. I am going to do more for students than any one official in ASUCD. I am going to sell them cell phones at very cheap prices. I am going to sell them cell phone plans that are much cheaper than what they have now. The students in turn can help their parents and friends save as well. I will employ students to spread this business and then within a sort time dominate the student market. These employees at the same time will make it their business to interact with ASUCD and then finally there will be a full CDP slate numbering beyond 6 candidates in November. The bonuses I and others would receive from this would allow us to outspend any particular slate. And if I lose the next election I will still have income from it regardless. So there is hope, and I am not going away ever." - - [[Comments]] - ------ - ''2006-11-08 23:55:12'' [[nbsp]] I didn't see anyone campaigning for yes on 85 anywhere in Davis...and Yolo county also rejected the amendment by a 25.6% margin --["TylerFelix"] - ------ - ------ - ''2007-02-24 00:57:59'' [[nbsp]] I'd like to see something more come out of this other than political nonsense... --["CarlosOverstreet"] - ------ - ''2007-02-25 22:15:58'' [[nbsp]] Oh man, sometimes coming back and reading the wiki really makes my day. Man! Selling cell phones. I never would have thought of that. --["JillWeinstein"]	+ deleted

Christian Democratic Party

JabberWokky — 2007-02-26 03:24:27

Formally quoted the text.

Differences for Christian Democratic Party

Deletions are marked with - .	Additions are marked with +.
Line 57:	Line 57:
- So the solution to ASUCD? A shadow government. I am going to do more for students than any one official in ASUCD. I am going to sell them cell phones at very cheap prices. I am going to sell them cell phone plans that are much cheaper than what they have now. The students in turn can help their parents and friends save as well. I will employ students to spread this business and then within a sort time dominate the student market. These employees at the same time will make it their business to interact with ASUCD and then finally there will be a full CDP slate numbering beyond 6 candidates in November. The bonuses I and others would receive from this would allow us to outspend any particular slate. And if I lose the next election I will still have income from it regardless. So there is hope, and I am not going away ever. --["SteveOstrowski"] (on his ["Livejournal" eljay])	+ On 2007-02-24, Steve Ostrowski posted to his ["Livejournal"]: "So the solution to ASUCD? A shadow government. I am going to do more for students than any one official in ASUCD. I am going to sell them cell phones at very cheap prices. I am going to sell them cell phone plans that are much cheaper than what they have now. The students in turn can help their parents and friends save as well. I will employ students to spread this business and then within a sort time dominate the student market. These employees at the same time will make it their business to interact with ASUCD and then finally there will be a full CDP slate numbering beyond 6 candidates in November. The bonuses I and others would receive from this would allow us to outspend any particular slate. And if I lose the next election I will still have income from it regardless. So there is hope, and I am not going away ever."

Christian Democratic Party

JillWeinstein — 2007-02-25 22:15:58

Comment added.

Differences for Christian Democratic Party

Deletions are marked with - .	Additions are marked with +.
Line 65:	Line 65:
	+ ------ + ''2007-02-25 22:15:58'' [[nbsp]] Oh man, sometimes coming back and reading the wiki really makes my day. Man! Selling cell phones. I never would have thought of that. --["JillWeinstein"]

Christian Democratic Party

BrentLaabs — 2007-02-25 21:54:24

have you got your christian slate cell phone yet?

Differences for Christian Democratic Party

Deletions are marked with - .	Additions are marked with +.
Line 55:	Line 55:
	+ = Future Plans = + + So the solution to ASUCD? A shadow government. I am going to do more for students than any one official in ASUCD. I am going to sell them cell phones at very cheap prices. I am going to sell them cell phone plans that are much cheaper than what they have now. The students in turn can help their parents and friends save as well. I will employ students to spread this business and then within a sort time dominate the student market. These employees at the same time will make it their business to interact with ASUCD and then finally there will be a full CDP slate numbering beyond 6 candidates in November. The bonuses I and others would receive from this would allow us to outspend any particular slate. And if I lose the next election I will still have income from it regardless. So there is hope, and I am not going away ever. --["SteveOstrowski"] (on his ["Livejournal" eljay]) +

Christian Democratic Party

WilliamLewis — 2007-02-24 11:45:11

Updates, various additions, corrections, rewording

Differences for Christian Democratic Party

Deletions are marked with - .	Additions are marked with +.
Line 13:	Line 13:
- One member of the Christine Democratic Party, Ron Payne, is currently running for Senate as an independent. - - The mention of a political party with a partly religious agenda has drawn criticisms from those in the community, and a few out of towners, who feel this would be a blow to the separation between church and state. Those on the side of the slate feel that trying to rally a Christian constituency is no different from rallying any other sort of one - that even if religion is a touchy subject in the modern world.	+ The mention of a political party with a partly religious agenda has drawn criticisms from those in the community, and a few out of towners, who feel this would be a blow to the separation between church and state. Those on the side of the slate feel that trying to rally a Christian constituency is no different from rallying any other sort of one - that even if religion is a touchy subject in the modern world. Additionally, some Christians have objected to the party as their platform doesn't reflect Christianity and they feel that the name of Christ is being exploited for political gain.
Line 31:	Line 29:
- 2. To create more awareness of the ["ASUCD"] system. The voter turnout is lower than 10%. This party would encourage a dramatic increase in that turnout. This party is also designed to get out the vote for the November election.	+ 2. To create more awareness of the ["ASUCD"] system. Historically, the voter turnout has been lower than 10%. This party wants to work to encourage a dramatic increase in that turnout.
Line 43:	Line 41:
- The Christian Slate owns the ["The Davis Enforcer"].	+ The Christian Democratic Party publishes the ["The Davis Enforcer"].
Line 51:	Line 49:
- ["Kirk Cowgill"] was the slate's first and only candidate. He received only 56 out of 3621 first place votes (1.6%). He was by far the least preferred candidate, being eliminated in the first round in the ["Choice Voting"] system and receiving 174 last place (#17 out of 17 candidates) votes, which was far more than any other candidate. Two of the six candidates the party endorsed (["Eric Friedman"] and ["Mara Harris"]) were elected to Senate.	+ ["Kirk Cowgill"] was the slate's first candidate to run for a seat in the ["ASUCD Senate"]. He received only 56 out of 3621 first place votes (1.6%). He was by far the least preferred candidate, being eliminated in the first round in the ["Choice Voting"] system and receiving 174 last place (#17 out of 17 candidates) votes, which was far more than any other candidate. Two of the six candidates the party endorsed (["Eric Friedman"] and ["Mara Harris"]) were elected to Senate.
Line 55:	Line 53:
- ["Ronald Payne"] was the slate's second and only candidate. He received 60 out of 5,547 first place votes. He later received 2 more votes in the next round for a total of 62. - -	+ ["Ronald Payne"] was the slate's second candidate to run for a seat in the ["ASUCD Senate"]. He received 60 out of 4,374 first place votes and was eliminated in the second round.

Christian Democratic Party

CarlosOverstreet — 2007-02-24 00:57:59

Comment added.

Differences for Christian Democratic Party

Deletions are marked with - .	Additions are marked with +.
Line 63:	Line 63:
	+ ------ + ''2007-02-24 00:57:59'' [[nbsp]] I'd like to see something more come out of this other than political nonsense... --["CarlosOverstreet"]