Recent Changes for "DCR Endorsement" - Davis Wikihttp://daviswiki.org/DCR_EndorsementRecent Changes of the page "DCR Endorsement" on Davis Wiki.en-us DCR Endorsementhttp://daviswiki.org/DCR_Endorsement2008-09-14 20:04:29JasonAllerlink fixes <div id="content" class="wikipage content"> Differences for DCR Endorsement<p><strong></strong></p><table> <tr> <td> <span> Deletions are marked with - . </span> </td> <td> <span> Additions are marked with +. </span> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> Line 2: </td> <td> Line 2: </td> </tr> <tr> <td> <span>- <br> - </span> </td> <td> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> Line 9: </td> <td> Line 7: </td> </tr> <tr> <td> <span>- </span> </td> <td> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> Line 14: </td> <td> Line 11: </td> </tr> <tr> <td> <span>-</span> WEDNESDAY, February 16, 2005 - The Davis College Republicans voted unanimously to endorse the LEAD Presidential ticket after hearing from both LEAD and Student Focus slates at this Wednesday<span>’</span>s weekly meeting. </td> <td> <span>+</span> WEDNESDAY, February 16, 2005 - The Davis College Republicans voted unanimously to endorse the LEAD Presidential ticket after hearing from both LEAD and Student Focus slates at this Wednesday<span>'</span>s weekly meeting. </td> </tr> <tr> <td> Line 20: </td> <td> Line 17: </td> </tr> <tr> <td> <span>-</span> "The Pledge and Flag bill have been historically important issues to our membership. Student Focus has yet to even consider this issue since taking control of the Executive office after years of DCR<span>’</span>s unwavering support" said Clumpner. </td> <td> <span>+</span> "The Pledge and Flag bill have been historically important issues to our membership. Student Focus has yet to even consider this issue since taking control of the Executive office after years of DCR<span>'</span>s unwavering support" said Clumpner. </td> </tr> <tr> <td> Line 28: </td> <td> Line 25: </td> </tr> <tr> <td> <span>- </span> </td> <td> <span>+ ''2005-02-17 09:36:42'' [[nbsp]] Hey George. Who is DCR endorsing for Senate? --["Users/RobRoy"]</span> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> Line 30: </td> <td> Line 27: </td> </tr> <tr> <td> <span>-</span> ''2005-02-17 09<span>:36:42</span>'' [[nbsp]] <span>H</span>e<span>y </span>George<span>. Who is DCR e</span>nd<span>o</span>rs<span>ing for Senate? --["RobRoy</span>"] </td> <td> <span>+</span> ''2005-02-17 <span>1</span>0<span>:15:5</span>9'' [[nbsp]] <span>fox --["Us</span>e<span>rs/</span>George<span>jA</span>ndr<span>ew</span>s"] </td> </tr> <tr> <td> Line 32: </td> <td> Line 29: </td> </tr> <tr> <td> <span>-</span> ''2005-02-17 1<span>0:15:59'' [[nbsp]] fox --["GeorgejAndrews"]------<br> - ''2005-02-17 1</span>8:03:47'' [[nbsp]] Its funny that after 5 years of voting for the ["Student Focus" lesser evil], ["Davis College Republicans" DCR] has finally realized that the ["Student Focus" lesser evil] has been useless in providing anyone other than themselves with anything of any value... --["PaulAmnuaypayoat"] </td> <td> <span>+</span> ''2005-02-17 18:03:47'' [[nbsp]] Its funny that after 5 years of voting for the ["Student Focus" lesser evil], ["Davis College Republicans" DCR] has finally realized that the ["Student Focus" lesser evil] has been useless in providing anyone other than themselves with anything of any value... --["<span>Users/</span>PaulAmnuaypayoat"] </td> </tr> <tr> <td> Line 35: </td> <td> Line 31: </td> </tr> <tr> <td> <span>- ''2005-02-18 09:15:41'' [[nbsp]] Paul you squish. You are just bitter because Focus whooped you when you ran for senate. I hope this doesn't come back to bite DCR in the butt, but more power to 'em. --["ChrisMays"]------<br> - ''2005-02-18 18:53:34'' [[nbsp]] Haha Chris, its good that you made it to the Wiki. But seriously, there is much evidence that they have cheated over these years, and tell me, what have they given to you or ["Davis College Republicans" DCR]? Most of their slate members are against conservatives, and against fiscal responsability. I might say that voting for ["Student Focus"] = communism --["PaulAmnuaypayoat"]------<br> - ''2005-02-18 20:45:24'' [[nbsp]] Funny thing that Student Focus ran and got elected a conservative last year, guess they are all really against conservatives eh? It is also well known that Focus isn't the only group to do illegal campaigning = cheating, oh well. --["JennyMays"]------<br> - ''2005-02-18 23:04:14'' [[nbsp]] I think the women of ["Davis College Republicans" DCR] had a stronger attraction to the LEAD presidential canidates than the males of DCR had to the Focus presidential canidates --["JamesSchwab"]</span> </td> <td> <span>+ ''2005-02-18 09:15:41'' [[nbsp]] Paul you squish. You are just bitter because Focus whooped you when you ran for senate. I hope this doesn't come back to bite DCR in the butt, but more power to 'em. --["Users/ChrisMays"]</span> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> Line 40: </td> <td> Line 33: </td> </tr> <tr> <td> <span>- ''2005-02-18 23:13:17'' [[nbsp]] Re Jenny: Thats why I said most. Yes, they almost always have a token conservative, but cmon. They have no problem allowing people such as ["Cari Ham"] to not only harass conservatives, they reward her with positions of ["ASUCD Senate" influence]. They promised the Pledge and the Flag for you guys years ago, something that costs no money, yet have failed to deliver after having all of that control of the government over all of those years. While supporting them at one time in the past may have been the better choice for many of you, it is now time to capitalize on the fact that you can elect your own people, such as ["Keith Shively"]. ["Student Focus"] is dead, especially after losing the hearts and minds of ["Davis College Republicans" DCR], which is still one of the most influential political groups on campus. I am not saying that ["LEAD"] or anyone else is perfect, but at this point any defense of ["Student Focus"] is futile. --["PaulAmnuaypayoat"]</span> </td> <td> <span>+ ''2005-02-18 18:53:34'' [[nbsp]] Haha Chris, its good that you made it to the Wiki. But seriously, there is much evidence that they have cheated over these years, and tell me, what have they given to you or ["Davis College Republicans" DCR]? Most of their slate members are against conservatives, and against fiscal responsability. I might say that voting for ["Student Focus"] = communism --["Users/PaulAmnuaypayoat"]</span> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> Line 42: </td> <td> Line 35: </td> </tr> <tr> <td> <span>- ''2005-02-19 23:58:18'' [[nbsp]] Kalen's veto of the 2/3 spending referendum bill is an example of where the LEAD slate is the more conservative, fiscally. Another useful fact: the LEAD slate is running ["Andrew Wong"], who is in ROTC (which means conservative, even though he's not an open conservative). Face it - since the IRS, LEAD's dangerous stuff isn't all that dangerous. --["KenBloom"]------<br> - ''2005-02-20 00:00:29'' [[nbsp]] ["JamesSchwab"]: The attractiveness of the candidates is the subject of a running debate between the men and women of DCR. They agree to disagree, and so we based our nomination on other factors. --["KenBloom"]</span> </td> <td> <span>+ ''2005-02-18 20:45:24'' [[nbsp]] Funny thing that Student Focus ran and got elected a conservative last year, guess they are all really against conservatives eh? It is also well known that Focus isn't the only group to do illegal campaigning = cheating, oh well. --["Users/JennyMays"]</span> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> Line 45: </td> <td> Line 37: </td> </tr> <tr> <td> <span>- I just wanted to say how pleasing it is to see DCR rescind its support for Student Focus, which is the cadre party of student government that serves as the perfect example of how the movie "Election" and reality collide at UCDavis. I applaud the criticism at the abuse of the veto, which Kalen Gallagher and Student Focus seems to have repeatedely used to further ruin the state of the organization that we all pay to support. Repubican or Democrat, Libertarian or Green, no one want their government to waste their money and no rational person could continue to support those that do just that. --["RobertBaron"]</span> </td> <td> <span>+ ''2005-02-18 23:04:14'' [[nbsp]] I think the women of ["Davis College Republicans" DCR] had a stronger attraction to the LEAD presidential canidates than the males of DCR had to the Focus presidential canidates --["Users/JamesSchwab"]</span> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> Line 47: </td> <td> Line 39: </td> </tr> <tr> <td> </td> <td> <span>+ ''2005-02-18 23:13:17'' [[nbsp]] Re Jenny: Thats why I said most. Yes, they almost always have a token conservative, but cmon. They have no problem allowing people such as ["Cari Ham"] to not only harass conservatives, they reward her with positions of ["ASUCD Senate" influence]. They promised the Pledge and the Flag for you guys years ago, something that costs no money, yet have failed to deliver after having all of that control of the government over all of those years. While supporting them at one time in the past may have been the better choice for many of you, it is now time to capitalize on the fact that you can elect your own people, such as ["Keith Shively"]. ["Student Focus"] is dead, especially after losing the hearts and minds of ["Davis College Republicans" DCR], which is still one of the most influential political groups on campus. I am not saying that ["LEAD"] or anyone else is perfect, but at this point any defense of ["Student Focus"] is futile. --["Users/PaulAmnuaypayoat"]</span> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> Line 48: </td> <td> Line 41: </td> </tr> <tr> <td> <span>- ''2007-02-16 19:35:55'' [[nbsp]] Oh how the winds of time change the picture. The majority of current LEAD candidates sadly do not support the ROTC according to DCR. They didn't like that. --["GregWebb"]</span> </td> <td> <span>+ ''2005-02-19 23:58:18'' [[nbsp]] Kalen's veto of the 2/3 spending referendum bill is an example of where the LEAD slate is the more conservative, fiscally. Another useful fact: the LEAD slate is running ["Andrew Wong"], who is in ROTC (which means conservative, even though he's not an open conservative). Face it - since the IRS, LEAD's dangerous stuff isn't all that dangerous. --["Users/KenBloom"]</span> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> Line 50: </td> <td> Line 43: </td> </tr> <tr> <td> <span>- ''2007-02-17 02:09:50'' [[nbsp]] LOL. Greg is uninformed. --["JamesSchwab"]</span> </td> <td> <span>+ ''2005-02-20 00:00:29'' [[nbsp]] ["Users/JamesSchwab"]: The attractiveness of the candidates is the subject of a running debate between the men and women of DCR. They agree to disagree, and so we based our nomination on other factors. --["Users/KenBloom"]<br> + ------<br> + I just wanted to say how pleasing it is to see DCR rescind its support for Student Focus, which is the cadre party of student government that serves as the perfect example of how the movie "Election" and reality collide at UCDavis. I applaud the criticism at the abuse of the veto, which Kalen Gallagher and Student Focus seems to have repeatedely used to further ruin the state of the organization that we all pay to support. Repubican or Democrat, Libertarian or Green, no one want their government to waste their money and no rational person could continue to support those that do just that. --["Users/RobertBaron"]<br> + ------<br> + ''2007-02-16 19:35:55'' [[nbsp]] Oh how the winds of time change the picture. The majority of current LEAD candidates sadly do not support the ROTC according to DCR. They didn't like that. --["Users/GregWebb"]<br> + ------<br> + ''2007-02-17 02:09:50'' [[nbsp]] LOL. Greg is uninformed. --["Users/JamesSchwab"]</span> </td> </tr> </table> </div> DCR Endorsementhttp://daviswiki.org/DCR_Endorsement2008-04-22 14:17:18GeorgejAndrews <div id="content" class="wikipage content"> Differences for DCR Endorsement<p><strong></strong></p><table> <tr> <td> <span> Deletions are marked with - . </span> </td> <td> <span> Additions are marked with +. </span> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> Line 10: </td> <td> Line 10: </td> </tr> <tr> <td> <span>-</span> Contact: George Andrews <span>(650) 255</span>-<span>0785 </span>– gjandrews@ucdavis.edu </td> <td> <span>+</span> Contact: George Andrews -– gjandrews@ucdavis.edu </td> </tr> </table> </div> DCR Endorsementhttp://daviswiki.org/DCR_Endorsement2007-10-21 18:46:40DonGibson(quick edit) <div id="content" class="wikipage content"> Differences for DCR Endorsement<p><strong></strong></p><table> <tr> <td> <span> Deletions are marked with - . </span> </td> <td> <span> Additions are marked with +. </span> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> Line 1: </td> <td> Line 1: </td> </tr> <tr> <td> <span>-</span> Here is the text of the DCR Press Release regarding the endorsement of LEAD for ["ASUCD President" President/Vice-President] </td> <td> <span>+</span> Here is the text of the DCR Press Release regarding the endorsement of <span>["</span>LEAD<span>"]</span> for ["ASUCD President" President/Vice-President] </td> </tr> </table> </div> DCR Endorsementhttp://daviswiki.org/DCR_Endorsement2007-02-17 02:09:50JamesSchwabComment added. <div id="content" class="wikipage content"> Differences for DCR Endorsement<p><strong></strong></p><table> <tr> <td> <span> Deletions are marked with - . </span> </td> <td> <span> Additions are marked with +. </span> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> Line 49: </td> <td> Line 49: </td> </tr> <tr> <td> </td> <td> <span>+ ------<br> + ''2007-02-17 02:09:50'' [[nbsp]] LOL. Greg is uninformed. --["JamesSchwab"]</span> </td> </tr> </table> </div> DCR Endorsementhttp://daviswiki.org/DCR_Endorsement2007-02-16 19:35:55GregWebbComment added. <div id="content" class="wikipage content"> Differences for DCR Endorsement<p><strong></strong></p><table> <tr> <td> <span> Deletions are marked with - . </span> </td> <td> <span> Additions are marked with +. </span> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> Line 8: </td> <td> Line 8: </td> </tr> <tr> <td> <span>- </span> </td> <td> <span>+ </span> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> Line 20: </td> <td> Line 20: </td> </tr> <tr> <td> <span>-</span> "The Pledge and Flag bill have been historically important issues to our membership. Student Focus has yet to even consider this issue since taking control of the Executive office after years of DCR’s unwavering support" said Clumpner.<span>&nbsp;</span> </td> <td> <span>+</span> "The Pledge and Flag bill have been historically important issues to our membership. Student Focus has yet to even consider this issue since taking control of the Executive office after years of DCR’s unwavering support" said Clumpner. </td> </tr> <tr> <td> Line 46: </td> <td> Line 46: </td> </tr> <tr> <td> <span>- ------ </span> </td> <td> <span>+ ------<br> + ------<br> + ''2007-02-16 19:35:55'' [[nbsp]] Oh how the winds of time change the picture. The majority of current LEAD candidates sadly do not support the ROTC according to DCR. They didn't like that. --["GregWebb"]</span> </td> </tr> </table> </div> DCR Endorsementhttp://daviswiki.org/DCR_Endorsement2005-04-11 00:26:02BrentLaabssenate link fixing <div id="content" class="wikipage content"> Differences for DCR Endorsement<p><strong></strong></p><table> <tr> <td> <span> Deletions are marked with - . </span> </td> <td> <span> Additions are marked with +. </span> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> Line 1: </td> <td> Line 1: </td> </tr> <tr> <td> <span>-</span> Here is the text of the DCR Press Release regarding the endorsement of LEAD for President/Vice-President </td> <td> <span>+</span> Here is the text of the DCR Press Release regarding the endorsement of LEAD for <span>["ASUCD President" </span>President/Vice-President<span>]</span> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> Line 10: </td> <td> Line 10: </td> </tr> <tr> <td> <span>-</span> Contact: George Andrews<span><br> -</span> (650) 255-0785 – gjandrews@ucdavis.edu </td> <td> <span>+</span> Contact: George Andrews (650) 255-0785 – gjandrews@ucdavis.edu </td> </tr> <tr> <td> Line 13: </td> <td> Line 12: </td> </tr> <tr> <td> <span>-</span> DCR Endorses LEAD Presidential Ticket:<span><br> -</span> Over 5 years of bitter feuds between LEAD and DCR come to a standstill </td> <td> <span>+</span> DCR Endorses LEAD Presidential Ticket: Over 5 years of bitter feuds between LEAD and DCR come to a standstill </td> </tr> <tr> <td> Line 42: </td> <td> Line 40: </td> </tr> <tr> <td> <span>-</span> ''2005-02-18 23:13:17'' [[nbsp]] Re Jenny: Thats why I said most. Yes, they almost always have a token conservative, but cmon. They have no problem allowing people such as ["Cari Ham"] to not only harass conservatives, they reward her with positions of ["Senate" influence]. They promised the Pledge and the Flag for you guys years ago, something that costs no money, yet have failed to deliver after having all of that control of the government over all of those years. While supporting them at one time in the past may have been the better choice for many of you, it is now time to capitalize on the fact that you can elect your own people, such as ["Keith Shively"]. ["Student Focus"] is dead, especially after losing the hearts and minds of ["Davis College Republicans" DCR], which is still one of the most influential political groups on campus. I am not saying that ["LEAD"] or anyone else is perfect, but at this point any defense of ["Student Focus"] is futile. --["PaulAmnuaypayoat"] </td> <td> <span>+</span> ''2005-02-18 23:13:17'' [[nbsp]] Re Jenny: Thats why I said most. Yes, they almost always have a token conservative, but cmon. They have no problem allowing people such as ["Cari Ham"] to not only harass conservatives, they reward her with positions of ["<span>ASUCD </span>Senate" influence]. They promised the Pledge and the Flag for you guys years ago, something that costs no money, yet have failed to deliver after having all of that control of the government over all of those years. While supporting them at one time in the past may have been the better choice for many of you, it is now time to capitalize on the fact that you can elect your own people, such as ["Keith Shively"]. ["Student Focus"] is dead, especially after losing the hearts and minds of ["Davis College Republicans" DCR], which is still one of the most influential political groups on campus. I am not saying that ["LEAD"] or anyone else is perfect, but at this point any defense of ["Student Focus"] is futile. --["PaulAmnuaypayoat"] </td> </tr> </table> </div> DCR Endorsementhttp://daviswiki.org/DCR_Endorsement2005-02-20 02:39:49AndreLipinski <div id="content" class="wikipage content"> Differences for DCR Endorsement<p><strong></strong></p><table> <tr> <td> <span> Deletions are marked with - . </span> </td> <td> <span> Additions are marked with +. </span> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> Line 46: </td> <td> Line 46: </td> </tr> <tr> <td> </td> <td> <span>+ ------<br> + I just wanted to say how pleasing it is to see DCR rescind its support for Student Focus, which is the cadre party of student government that serves as the perfect example of how the movie "Election" and reality collide at UCDavis. I applaud the criticism at the abuse of the veto, which Kalen Gallagher and Student Focus seems to have repeatedely used to further ruin the state of the organization that we all pay to support. Repubican or Democrat, Libertarian or Green, no one want their government to waste their money and no rational person could continue to support those that do just that. --["RobertBaron"]<br> + ------ </span> </td> </tr> </table> </div> DCR Endorsementhttp://daviswiki.org/DCR_Endorsement2005-02-20 00:00:29KenBloomComment added. <div id="content" class="wikipage content"> Differences for DCR Endorsement<p><strong></strong></p><table> <tr> <td> <span> Deletions are marked with - . </span> </td> <td> <span> Additions are marked with +. </span> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> Line 44: </td> <td> Line 44: </td> </tr> <tr> <td> <span>-</span> ''2005-02-19 23:58:18'' [[nbsp]] Kalen's veto of the 2/3 spending referendum bill is an example of where the LEAD slate is the more conservative, fiscally. Another useful fact: the LEAD slate is running ["Andrew Wong"], who is in ROTC (which means conservative, even though he's not an open conservative). Face it - since the IRS, LEAD's dangerous stuff isn't all that dangerous. --["KenBloom"] </td> <td> <span>+</span> ''2005-02-19 23:58:18'' [[nbsp]] Kalen's veto of the 2/3 spending referendum bill is an example of where the LEAD slate is the more conservative, fiscally. Another useful fact: the LEAD slate is running ["Andrew Wong"], who is in ROTC (which means conservative, even though he's not an open conservative). Face it - since the IRS, LEAD's dangerous stuff isn't all that dangerous. --["KenBloom"]<span>------<br> + ''2005-02-20 00:00:29'' [[nbsp]] ["JamesSchwab"]: The attractiveness of the candidates is the subject of a running debate between the men and women of DCR. They agree to disagree, and so we based our nomination on other factors. --["KenBloom"]</span> </td> </tr> </table> </div> DCR Endorsementhttp://daviswiki.org/DCR_Endorsement2005-02-19 23:58:18KenBloomComment added. <div id="content" class="wikipage content"> Differences for DCR Endorsement<p><strong></strong></p><table> <tr> <td> <span> Deletions are marked with - . </span> </td> <td> <span> Additions are marked with +. </span> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> Line 43: </td> <td> Line 43: </td> </tr> <tr> <td> </td> <td> <span>+ ------<br> + ''2005-02-19 23:58:18'' [[nbsp]] Kalen's veto of the 2/3 spending referendum bill is an example of where the LEAD slate is the more conservative, fiscally. Another useful fact: the LEAD slate is running ["Andrew Wong"], who is in ROTC (which means conservative, even though he's not an open conservative). Face it - since the IRS, LEAD's dangerous stuff isn't all that dangerous. --["KenBloom"]</span> </td> </tr> </table> </div> DCR Endorsementhttp://daviswiki.org/DCR_Endorsement2005-02-18 23:21:00PaulAmnuaypayoatmore $0.02. links <div id="content" class="wikipage content"> Differences for DCR Endorsement<p><strong></strong></p><table> <tr> <td> <span> Deletions are marked with - . </span> </td> <td> <span> Additions are marked with +. </span> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> Line 40: </td> <td> Line 40: </td> </tr> <tr> <td> <span>-</span> ''2005-02-18 23:04:14'' [[nbsp]] I think the women of DCR had a stronger attraction to the LEAD presidential canidates than the males of DCR had to the Focus presidential canidates --["JamesSchwab"] </td> <td> <span>+</span> ''2005-02-18 23:04:14'' [[nbsp]] I think the women of <span>["Davis College Republicans" </span>DCR<span>]</span> had a stronger attraction to the LEAD presidential canidates than the males of DCR had to the Focus presidential canidates --["JamesSchwab"] </td> </tr> <tr> <td> Line 42: </td> <td> Line 42: </td> </tr> <tr> <td> <span>-</span> ''2005-02-18 23:13:17'' [[nbsp]] Re Jenny: Thats why I said most. Yes, they almost always have a token conservative, but cmon. They <span>promised the pledge and the flag for you guys years ago</span>, <span>something that costs no money</span>, <span>yet have failed to deliver after having all of that control of the government</span>. While supporting them at one time in the past may have been the better choice for many of you, it is now time to capitalize on the fact that you can elect your own people, such as Keith Shively. Focus is dead, especially after losing the hearts and minds of DCR, which is still one of the most influential political groups on campus. --["PaulAmnuaypayoat"] </td> <td> <span>+</span> ''2005-02-18 23:13:17'' [[nbsp]] Re Jenny: Thats why I said most. Yes, they almost always have a token conservative, but cmon. They <span>have no problem allowing people such as ["Cari Ham"] to not only harass conservatives</span>, <span>they reward her with positions of ["Senate" influence]. They promised the Pledge and the Flag for you guys years ago</span>, <span>something that costs no money, yet have failed to deliver after having all of that control of the government over all of those years</span>. While supporting them at one time in the past may have been the better choice for many of you, it is now time to capitalize on the fact that you can elect your own people, such as <span>["</span>Keith Shively<span>"]</span>. <span>["Student </span>Focus<span>"]</span> is dead, especially after losing the hearts and minds of<span>&nbsp;["Davis College Republicans"</span> DCR<span>]</span>, which is still one of the most influential political groups on campus<span>. I am not saying that ["LEAD"] or anyone else is perfect, but at this point any defense of ["Student Focus"] is futile</span>. --["PaulAmnuaypayoat"] </td> </tr> </table> </div> DCR Endorsementhttp://daviswiki.org/DCR_Endorsement2005-02-18 23:13:17PaulAmnuaypayoatComment added. <div id="content" class="wikipage content"> Differences for DCR Endorsement<p><strong></strong></p><table> <tr> <td> <span> Deletions are marked with - . </span> </td> <td> <span> Additions are marked with +. </span> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> Line 41: </td> <td> Line 41: </td> </tr> <tr> <td> </td> <td> <span>+ ------<br> + ''2005-02-18 23:13:17'' [[nbsp]] Re Jenny: Thats why I said most. Yes, they almost always have a token conservative, but cmon. They promised the pledge and the flag for you guys years ago, something that costs no money, yet have failed to deliver after having all of that control of the government. While supporting them at one time in the past may have been the better choice for many of you, it is now time to capitalize on the fact that you can elect your own people, such as Keith Shively. Focus is dead, especially after losing the hearts and minds of DCR, which is still one of the most influential political groups on campus. --["PaulAmnuaypayoat"]</span> </td> </tr> </table> </div> DCR Endorsementhttp://daviswiki.org/DCR_Endorsement2005-02-18 23:05:38JamesSchwab <div id="content" class="wikipage content"> Differences for DCR Endorsement<p><strong></strong></p><table> <tr> <td> <span> Deletions are marked with - . </span> </td> <td> <span> Additions are marked with +. </span> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> Line 40: </td> <td> Line 40: </td> </tr> <tr> <td> <span>-</span> ''2005-02-18 23:04:14'' [[nbsp]] I think the women of DCR had a stronger attraction to the LEAD presidential canidates <span>was stronger </span>than the males of DCR had to the Focus presidential canidates --["JamesSchwab"] </td> <td> <span>+</span> ''2005-02-18 23:04:14'' [[nbsp]] I think the women of DCR had a stronger attraction to the LEAD presidential canidates than the males of DCR had to the Focus presidential canidates --["JamesSchwab"] </td> </tr> </table> </div> DCR Endorsementhttp://daviswiki.org/DCR_Endorsement2005-02-18 23:05:12JamesSchwab <div id="content" class="wikipage content"> Differences for DCR Endorsement<p><strong></strong></p><table> <tr> <td> <span> Deletions are marked with - . </span> </td> <td> <span> Additions are marked with +. </span> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> Line 40: </td> <td> Line 40: </td> </tr> <tr> <td> <span>-</span> ''2005-02-18 23:04:14'' [[nbsp]] I think the <span>W</span>omen of DCR<span>'s</span> attraction to the LEAD presidential canidates was stronger than the males of DCR<span>'s attraction</span> to the Focus presidential canidates --["JamesSchwab"] </td> <td> <span>+</span> ''2005-02-18 23:04:14'' [[nbsp]] I think the <span>w</span>omen of DCR<span>&nbsp;had a stronger</span> attraction to the LEAD presidential canidates was stronger than the males of DCR<span>&nbsp;had</span> to the Focus presidential canidates --["JamesSchwab"] </td> </tr> </table> </div> DCR Endorsementhttp://daviswiki.org/DCR_Endorsement2005-02-18 23:04:14JamesSchwabComment added. <div id="content" class="wikipage content"> Differences for DCR Endorsement<p><strong></strong></p><table> <tr> <td> <span> Deletions are marked with - . </span> </td> <td> <span> Additions are marked with +. </span> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> Line 39: </td> <td> Line 39: </td> </tr> <tr> <td> <span>-</span> ''2005-02-18 20:45:24'' [[nbsp]] Funny thing that Student Focus ran and got elected a conservative last year, guess they are all really against conservatives eh? It is also well known that Focus isn't the only group to do illegal campaigning = cheating, oh well. --["JennyMays"] </td> <td> <span>+</span> ''2005-02-18 20:45:24'' [[nbsp]] Funny thing that Student Focus ran and got elected a conservative last year, guess they are all really against conservatives eh? It is also well known that Focus isn't the only group to do illegal campaigning = cheating, oh well. --["JennyMays"]<span>------<br> + ''2005-02-18 23:04:14'' [[nbsp]] I think the Women of DCR's attraction to the LEAD presidential canidates was stronger than the males of DCR's attraction to the Focus presidential canidates --["JamesSchwab"]</span> </td> </tr> </table> </div> DCR Endorsementhttp://daviswiki.org/DCR_Endorsement2005-02-18 20:45:24JennyMaysComment added. <div id="content" class="wikipage content"> Differences for DCR Endorsement<p><strong></strong></p><table> <tr> <td> <span> Deletions are marked with - . </span> </td> <td> <span> Additions are marked with +. </span> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> Line 38: </td> <td> Line 38: </td> </tr> <tr> <td> <span>-</span> ''2005-02-18 18:53:34'' [[nbsp]] Haha Chris, its good that you made it to the Wiki. But seriously, there is much evidence that they have cheated over these years, and tell me, what have they given to you or ["Davis College Republicans" DCR]? Most of their slate members are against conservatives, and against fiscal responsability. I might say that voting for ["Student Focus"] = communism --["PaulAmnuaypayoat"] </td> <td> <span>+</span> ''2005-02-18 18:53:34'' [[nbsp]] Haha Chris, its good that you made it to the Wiki. But seriously, there is much evidence that they have cheated over these years, and tell me, what have they given to you or ["Davis College Republicans" DCR]? Most of their slate members are against conservatives, and against fiscal responsability. I might say that voting for ["Student Focus"] = communism --["PaulAmnuaypayoat"]<span>------<br> + ''2005-02-18 20:45:24'' [[nbsp]] Funny thing that Student Focus ran and got elected a conservative last year, guess they are all really against conservatives eh? It is also well known that Focus isn't the only group to do illegal campaigning = cheating, oh well. --["JennyMays"]</span> </td> </tr> </table> </div> DCR Endorsementhttp://daviswiki.org/DCR_Endorsement2005-02-18 18:53:34PaulAmnuaypayoatComment added. <div id="content" class="wikipage content"> Differences for DCR Endorsement<p><strong></strong></p><table> <tr> <td> <span> Deletions are marked with - . </span> </td> <td> <span> Additions are marked with +. </span> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> Line 37: </td> <td> Line 37: </td> </tr> <tr> <td> <span>-</span> ''2005-02-18 09:15:41'' [[nbsp]] Paul you squish. You are just bitter because Focus whooped you when you ran for senate. I hope this doesn't come back to bite DCR in the butt, but more power to 'em. --["ChrisMays"] </td> <td> <span>+</span> ''2005-02-18 09:15:41'' [[nbsp]] Paul you squish. You are just bitter because Focus whooped you when you ran for senate. I hope this doesn't come back to bite DCR in the butt, but more power to 'em. --["ChrisMays"]<span>------<br> + ''2005-02-18 18:53:34'' [[nbsp]] Haha Chris, its good that you made it to the Wiki. But seriously, there is much evidence that they have cheated over these years, and tell me, what have they given to you or ["Davis College Republicans" DCR]? Most of their slate members are against conservatives, and against fiscal responsability. I might say that voting for ["Student Focus"] = communism --["PaulAmnuaypayoat"]</span> </td> </tr> </table> </div> DCR Endorsementhttp://daviswiki.org/DCR_Endorsement2005-02-18 09:15:41ChrisMaysComment added. <div id="content" class="wikipage content"> Differences for DCR Endorsement<p><strong></strong></p><table> <tr> <td> <span> Deletions are marked with - . </span> </td> <td> <span> Additions are marked with +. </span> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> Line 36: </td> <td> Line 36: </td> </tr> <tr> <td> </td> <td> <span>+ ------<br> + ''2005-02-18 09:15:41'' [[nbsp]] Paul you squish. You are just bitter because Focus whooped you when you ran for senate. I hope this doesn't come back to bite DCR in the butt, but more power to 'em. --["ChrisMays"]</span> </td> </tr> </table> </div> DCR Endorsementhttp://daviswiki.org/DCR_Endorsement2005-02-17 18:08:05GeorgejAndrews <div id="content" class="wikipage content"> Differences for DCR Endorsement<p><strong></strong></p><table> <tr> <td> <span> Deletions are marked with - . </span> </td> <td> <span> Additions are marked with +. </span> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> Line 13: </td> <td> Line 13: </td> </tr> <tr> <td> <span>-</span> DCR Endorses LEAD Presidential Ticket </td> <td> <span>+</span> DCR Endorses LEAD Presidential Ticket<span>:</span> </td> </tr> </table> </div> DCR Endorsementhttp://daviswiki.org/DCR_Endorsement2005-02-17 18:03:47PaulAmnuaypayoatComment added. <div id="content" class="wikipage content"> Differences for DCR Endorsement<p><strong></strong></p><table> <tr> <td> <span> Deletions are marked with - . </span> </td> <td> <span> Additions are marked with +. </span> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> Line 34: </td> <td> Line 34: </td> </tr> <tr> <td> <span>- ''2005-02-17 10:15:59'' [[nbsp]] fox --["GeorgejAndrews"]</span> </td> <td> <span>+ ''2005-02-17 10:15:59'' [[nbsp]] fox --["GeorgejAndrews"]------<br> + ''2005-02-17 18:03:47'' [[nbsp]] Its funny that after 5 years of voting for the ["Student Focus" lesser evil], ["Davis College Republicans" DCR] has finally realized that the ["Student Focus" lesser evil] has been useless in providing anyone other than themselves with anything of any value... --["PaulAmnuaypayoat"]</span> </td> </tr> </table> </div> DCR Endorsementhttp://daviswiki.org/DCR_Endorsement2005-02-17 10:15:59GeorgejAndrewsComment added. <div id="content" class="wikipage content"> Differences for DCR Endorsement<p><strong></strong></p><table> <tr> <td> <span> Deletions are marked with - . </span> </td> <td> <span> Additions are marked with +. </span> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> Line 33: </td> <td> Line 33: </td> </tr> <tr> <td> </td> <td> <span>+ ------<br> + ''2005-02-17 10:15:59'' [[nbsp]] fox --["GeorgejAndrews"]</span> </td> </tr> </table> </div> DCR Endorsementhttp://daviswiki.org/DCR_Endorsement2005-02-17 10:15:19GeorgejAndrewsforgot veto pen part from Ryan <div id="content" class="wikipage content"> Differences for DCR Endorsement<p><strong></strong></p><table> <tr> <td> <span> Deletions are marked with - . </span> </td> <td> <span> Additions are marked with +. </span> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> Line 18: </td> <td> Line 18: </td> </tr> <tr> <td> <span>-</span> "We believe that Student Focus has shown over the past year and continues to demonstrate that they are no longer worthy of our staunch support," said DCR Chairman Ryan Clumpner. "Despite significant historical differences, the current LEAD slate has demonstrated to share many of the same values as our members, such as fiscal responsibility, increased accountability to the student body and respect for all groups on campus. On the issues that matter most, we are virtually in complete agreement." </td> <td> <span>+</span> "We believe that Student Focus has shown over the past year and continues to demonstrate that they are no longer worthy of our staunch support<span>&nbsp;due to the abuse of their veto pen</span>," said DCR Chairman Ryan Clumpner. "Despite significant historical differences, the current LEAD slate has demonstrated to share many of the same values as our members, such as fiscal responsibility, increased accountability to the student body and respect for all groups on campus. On the issues that matter most, we are virtually in complete agreement." </td> </tr> </table> </div> DCR Endorsementhttp://daviswiki.org/DCR_Endorsement2005-02-17 09:36:42RobRoyComment added. <div id="content" class="wikipage content"> Differences for DCR Endorsement<p><strong></strong></p><table> <tr> <td> <span> Deletions are marked with - . </span> </td> <td> <span> Additions are marked with +. </span> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> Line 31: </td> <td> Line 31: </td> </tr> <tr> <td> </td> <td> <span>+ ------<br> + ''2005-02-17 09:36:42'' [[nbsp]] Hey George. Who is DCR endorsing for Senate? --["RobRoy"]</span> </td> </tr> </table> </div> DCR Endorsementhttp://daviswiki.org/DCR_Endorsement2005-02-17 09:36:16RobRoy <div id="content" class="wikipage content"> Differences for DCR Endorsement<p><strong></strong></p><table> <tr> <td> <span> Deletions are marked with - . </span> </td> <td> <span> Additions are marked with +. </span> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> Line 28: </td> <td> Line 28: </td> </tr> <tr> <td> </td> <td> <span>+ [[Comments]]</span> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> Line 29: </td> <td> Line 30: </td> </tr> <tr> <td> </td> <td> <span>+ </span> </td> </tr> </table> </div> DCR Endorsementhttp://daviswiki.org/DCR_Endorsement2005-02-17 09:14:14GeorgejAndrewsDavis College Republicans Press Release on why they endorsed LEAD <div id="content" class="wikipage content"> Differences for DCR Endorsement<p><strong></strong></p><table> <tr> <td> <span> Deletions are marked with - . </span> </td> <td> <span> Additions are marked with +. </span> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> Line 1: </td> <td> Line 1: </td> </tr> <tr> <td> </td> <td> <span>+ Here is the text of the DCR Press Release regarding the endorsement of LEAD for President/Vice-President<br> + <br> + <br> + <br> + DAVIS COLLEGE REPUBLICANS<br> + <br> + www.ucdcr.com<br> + <br> + <br> + Contact: George Andrews<br> + (650) 255-0785 – gjandrews@ucdavis.edu<br> + <br> + DCR Endorses LEAD Presidential Ticket<br> + Over 5 years of bitter feuds between LEAD and DCR come to a standstill<br> + <br> + WEDNESDAY, February 16, 2005 - The Davis College Republicans voted unanimously to endorse the LEAD Presidential ticket after hearing from both LEAD and Student Focus slates at this Wednesday’s weekly meeting.<br> + <br> + "We believe that Student Focus has shown over the past year and continues to demonstrate that they are no longer worthy of our staunch support," said DCR Chairman Ryan Clumpner. "Despite significant historical differences, the current LEAD slate has demonstrated to share many of the same values as our members, such as fiscal responsibility, increased accountability to the student body and respect for all groups on campus. On the issues that matter most, we are virtually in complete agreement."<br> + <br> + The DCR-LEAD coalition solidified when the slate made a promise to support both the Pledge bill and the Flag bill during a question and answer session at the DCR meeting. The Pledge bill would make the Pledge of Allegiance a part of ASUCD Senate meetings. The Flag bill would put a U.S and California State flag in the ASUCD Senate room for meetings. Currently, the vast majority of legislative bodies in the United States display the U.S Flag and use the Pledge of Allegiance.<br> + <br> + "The Pledge and Flag bill have been historically important issues to our membership. Student Focus has yet to even consider this issue since taking control of the Executive office after years of DCR’s unwavering support" said Clumpner. <br> + <br> + DCR intends to throw the full weight of its support behind LEAD, similar to the DCR efforts undertaken during the stunning election of ASUCD Senator Keith Shively in Fall 2004. "DCR believes this coalition will be a powerful force in upcoming election and we intend to make our endorsement meaningful," said Clumpner. "This fracture in our once concrete Focus voting bloc can result in a major swing in the election. We expect a high turnout in favor of LEAD among our members and look forward to working with LEAD to make ASUCD a respectable and effective student government once again."<br> + <br> + -30-<br> + <br> + </span> </td> </tr> </table> </div>