Recent Changes for "Eddie Lee" - Davis Wikihttp://daviswiki.org/Eddie_LeeRecent Changes of the page "Eddie Lee" on Davis Wiki.en-us Eddie Leehttp://daviswiki.org/Eddie_Lee2008-05-28 20:49:49WilliamLewisRevert to version 29 (lurk moar.). <div id="content" class="wikipage content"> Differences for Eddie Lee<p><strong></strong></p><table> <tr> <td> <span> Deletions are marked with - . </span> </td> <td> <span> Additions are marked with +. </span> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> Line 1: </td> <td> Line 1: </td> </tr> <tr> <td> <span>- '''Eddie Lee''' serves as Editor in Chief of ["The California Aggie"] for the 2007-2008 school year. He is a senior majoring in communication.</span> </td> <td> <span>+ '''Eddie Lee''' is the current Editor in Chief of ["The California Aggie"]. Lee was a sports writer for the Aggie for about one year (2006 - May 2007) before being selected by the ["Campus Media Board"] to be editor in chief of the paper for the 2007-2008 school year. In his first story as a senior staff writer, part of his training to be editor in chief, Eddie Lee plagiarized from a press release, an offense he admitted to and was fired for on May 9, 2007. After controversy erupted at The Aggie (see ["The California Aggie Controversies"] for more information), ["Marion Everidge"] was named interim editor in chief and subsequently reinstated Eddie Lee as a senior staff writer on May 17, 2007. This is the first time a writer has been allowed to continue working for The Aggie after committing plagiarism, although plagiarizing a press release is typically something that only mandates a warning in major newspapers such as ["The Sacramento Bee"].</span> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> Line 3: </td> <td> Line 3: </td> </tr> <tr> <td> <span>- Before becoming editor in chief, Lee had been a sports writer for The Aggie.</span> </td> <td> <span>+ Some Aggie staff members speculated that ["Marion Everidge"] and ["Peter Hamilton"] structured Lee's training so that he would fail and they could fire him. Included in this training were assignments that required him to turn in stories within 15 hours (7 p.m. to 2 p.m.) for the city and campus desks, with which he was not familiar. The way that this training was structured is unique, and some construed it as a way to entrap Lee. Signers of the petition against Hamilton and ["Talia Kennedy"] suspected that Lee was set up to be fired so Kennedy could apply for the editor-in-chief position.</span> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> Line 5: </td> <td> Line 5: </td> </tr> <tr> <td> <span>- Some controversy surrounded a story he plagiarized for the paper while undergoing training to be editor in chief in May 2007. Lee admitted to plagiarizing and was fired on May 9, 2007. But he was reinstated a few days later after some staff members complained that they thought his training was a set-up, though the training was part of standard procedure for incoming staff members. For more information, see the ["The California Aggie Controversies"] page.</span> </td> <td> <span>+ Hamilton and Everidge did not introduce this training, called "senior staff writing," specifically for Lee. It has been included in The Aggie's budget for years and is standard training for those ascending in rank at The Aggie. (For example, Marion Everidge trained as a senior staff writer for two weeks in May 2006 for the managing editor position.) Though Lee had not written stories for the campus or city desks, every Aggie reporter is explicitly warned, upon his or her employment, that plagiarism is strictly forbidden and leads to immediate termination at The Aggie.<br> + <br> + It is important to note, however, that Aggie Sports Writers like Lee don't usually deal with press releases, and some of the Aggie staff felt that he was not given the necessary tools or enough briefing that is usually given to those who write for other desks (like campus, city and science) that use press releases. Also, Lee technically only had one source, the press release itself, and some members of the staff felt that it was a suspicious oversight on ["Talia Kennedy" Kennedy's] part since writers are told they need three sources. Whether or not her oversight was purposeful will always remain a mystery.</span> </td> </tr> </table> </div> Eddie Leehttp://daviswiki.org/Eddie_Lee2008-05-28 20:08:47PS2Revert to version 28 (This protects Eddie Lee, + negative info is still on the controversies page.). <div id="content" class="wikipage content"> Differences for Eddie Lee<p><strong></strong></p><table> <tr> <td> <span> Deletions are marked with - . </span> </td> <td> <span> Additions are marked with +. </span> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> Line 1: </td> <td> Line 1: </td> </tr> <tr> <td> <span>- '''Eddie Lee''' is the current Editor in Chief of ["The California Aggie"]. Lee was a sports writer for the Aggie for about one year (2006 - May 2007) before being selected by the ["Campus Media Board"] to be editor in chief of the paper for the 2007-2008 school year. In his first story as a senior staff writer, part of his training to be editor in chief, Eddie Lee plagiarized from a press release, an offense he admitted to and was fired for on May 9, 2007. After controversy erupted at The Aggie (see ["The California Aggie Controversies"] for more information), ["Marion Everidge"] was named interim editor in chief and subsequently reinstated Eddie Lee as a senior staff writer on May 17, 2007. This is the first time a writer has been allowed to continue working for The Aggie after committing plagiarism, although plagiarizing a press release is typically something that only mandates a warning in major newspapers such as ["The Sacramento Bee"].</span> </td> <td> <span>+ '''Eddie Lee''' serves as Editor in Chief of ["The California Aggie"] for the 2007-2008 school year. He is a senior majoring in communication.</span> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> Line 3: </td> <td> Line 3: </td> </tr> <tr> <td> <span>- Some Aggie staff members speculated that ["Marion Everidge"] and ["Peter Hamilton"] structured Lee's training so that he would fail and they could fire him. Included in this training were assignments that required him to turn in stories within 15 hours (7 p.m. to 2 p.m.) for the city and campus desks, with which he was not familiar. The way that this training was structured is unique, and some construed it as a way to entrap Lee. Signers of the petition against Hamilton and ["Talia Kennedy"] suspected that Lee was set up to be fired so Kennedy could apply for the editor-in-chief position.</span> </td> <td> <span>+ Before becoming editor in chief, Lee had been a sports writer for The Aggie.</span> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> Line 5: </td> <td> Line 5: </td> </tr> <tr> <td> <span>- Hamilton and Everidge did not introduce this training, called "senior staff writing," specifically for Lee. It has been included in The Aggie's budget for years and is standard training for those ascending in rank at The Aggie. (For example, Marion Everidge trained as a senior staff writer for two weeks in May 2006 for the managing editor position.) Though Lee had not written stories for the campus or city desks, every Aggie reporter is explicitly warned, upon his or her employment, that plagiarism is strictly forbidden and leads to immediate termination at The Aggie.<br> - <br> - It is important to note, however, that Aggie Sports Writers like Lee don't usually deal with press releases, and some of the Aggie staff felt that he was not given the necessary tools or enough briefing that is usually given to those who write for other desks (like campus, city and science) that use press releases. Also, Lee technically only had one source, the press release itself, and some members of the staff felt that it was a suspicious oversight on ["Talia Kennedy" Kennedy's] part since writers are told they need three sources. Whether or not her oversight was purposeful will always remain a mystery.</span> </td> <td> <span>+ Some controversy surrounded a story he plagiarized for the paper while undergoing training to be editor in chief in May 2007. Lee admitted to plagiarizing and was fired on May 9, 2007. But he was reinstated a few days later after some staff members complained that they thought his training was a set-up, though the training was part of standard procedure for incoming staff members. For more information, see the ["The California Aggie Controversies"] page.</span> </td> </tr> </table> </div> Eddie Leehttp://daviswiki.org/Eddie_Lee2008-05-28 18:58:20AndrewPeakeRevert to version 27 (I think if it is true, then it isn't a problem.). <div id="content" class="wikipage content"> Differences for Eddie Lee<p><strong></strong></p><table> <tr> <td> <span> Deletions are marked with - . </span> </td> <td> <span> Additions are marked with +. </span> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> Line 1: </td> <td> Line 1: </td> </tr> <tr> <td> <span>- '''Eddie Lee''' serves as Editor in Chief of ["The California Aggie"] for the 2007-2008 school year. He is a senior majoring in communication.</span> </td> <td> <span>+ '''Eddie Lee''' is the current Editor in Chief of ["The California Aggie"]. Lee was a sports writer for the Aggie for about one year (2006 - May 2007) before being selected by the ["Campus Media Board"] to be editor in chief of the paper for the 2007-2008 school year. In his first story as a senior staff writer, part of his training to be editor in chief, Eddie Lee plagiarized from a press release, an offense he admitted to and was fired for on May 9, 2007. After controversy erupted at The Aggie (see ["The California Aggie Controversies"] for more information), ["Marion Everidge"] was named interim editor in chief and subsequently reinstated Eddie Lee as a senior staff writer on May 17, 2007. This is the first time a writer has been allowed to continue working for The Aggie after committing plagiarism, although plagiarizing a press release is typically something that only mandates a warning in major newspapers such as ["The Sacramento Bee"].</span> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> Line 3: </td> <td> Line 3: </td> </tr> <tr> <td> <span>- Before becoming editor in chief, Lee had been a sports writer for The Aggie.</span> </td> <td> <span>+ Some Aggie staff members speculated that ["Marion Everidge"] and ["Peter Hamilton"] structured Lee's training so that he would fail and they could fire him. Included in this training were assignments that required him to turn in stories within 15 hours (7 p.m. to 2 p.m.) for the city and campus desks, with which he was not familiar. The way that this training was structured is unique, and some construed it as a way to entrap Lee. Signers of the petition against Hamilton and ["Talia Kennedy"] suspected that Lee was set up to be fired so Kennedy could apply for the editor-in-chief position.</span> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> Line 5: </td> <td> Line 5: </td> </tr> <tr> <td> <span>- Some controversy surrounded a story he plagiarized for the paper while undergoing training to be editor in chief in May 2007. Lee admitted to plagiarizing and was fired on May 9, 2007. But he was reinstated a few days later after some staff members complained that they thought his training was a set-up, though the training was part of standard procedure for incoming staff members. For more information, see the ["The California Aggie Controversies"] page.</span> </td> <td> <span>+ Hamilton and Everidge did not introduce this training, called "senior staff writing," specifically for Lee. It has been included in The Aggie's budget for years and is standard training for those ascending in rank at The Aggie. (For example, Marion Everidge trained as a senior staff writer for two weeks in May 2006 for the managing editor position.) Though Lee had not written stories for the campus or city desks, every Aggie reporter is explicitly warned, upon his or her employment, that plagiarism is strictly forbidden and leads to immediate termination at The Aggie.<br> + <br> + It is important to note, however, that Aggie Sports Writers like Lee don't usually deal with press releases, and some of the Aggie staff felt that he was not given the necessary tools or enough briefing that is usually given to those who write for other desks (like campus, city and science) that use press releases. Also, Lee technically only had one source, the press release itself, and some members of the staff felt that it was a suspicious oversight on ["Talia Kennedy" Kennedy's] part since writers are told they need three sources. Whether or not her oversight was purposeful will always remain a mystery.</span> </td> </tr> </table> </div> Eddie Leehttp://daviswiki.org/Eddie_Lee2008-05-28 17:25:03PS2Revert to version 26 (I just think it's time to move on/not have all this old info pop up in Google). <div id="content" class="wikipage content"> Differences for Eddie Lee<p><strong></strong></p><table> <tr> <td> <span> Deletions are marked with - . </span> </td> <td> <span> Additions are marked with +. </span> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> Line 1: </td> <td> Line 1: </td> </tr> <tr> <td> <span>- '''Eddie Lee''' is the current Editor in Chief of ["The California Aggie"]. Lee was a sports writer for the Aggie for about one year (2006 - May 2007) before being selected by the ["Campus Media Board"] to be editor in chief of the paper for the 2007-2008 school year. In his first story as a senior staff writer, part of his training to be editor in chief, Eddie Lee plagiarized from a press release, an offense he admitted to and was fired for on May 9, 2007. After controversy erupted at The Aggie (see ["The California Aggie Controversies"] for more information), ["Marion Everidge"] was named interim editor in chief and subsequently reinstated Eddie Lee as a senior staff writer on May 17, 2007. This is the first time a writer has been allowed to continue working for The Aggie after committing plagiarism, although plagiarizing a press release is typically something that only mandates a warning in major newspapers such as ["The Sacramento Bee"].</span> </td> <td> <span>+ '''Eddie Lee''' serves as Editor in Chief of ["The California Aggie"] for the 2007-2008 school year. He is a senior majoring in communication.</span> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> Line 3: </td> <td> Line 3: </td> </tr> <tr> <td> <span>- Some Aggie staff members speculated that ["Marion Everidge"] and ["Peter Hamilton"] structured Lee's training so that he would fail and they could fire him. Included in this training were assignments that required him to turn in stories within 15 hours (7 p.m. to 2 p.m.) for the city and campus desks, with which he was not familiar. The way that this training was structured is unique, and some construed it as a way to entrap Lee. Signers of the petition against Hamilton and ["Talia Kennedy"] suspected that Lee was set up to be fired so Kennedy could apply for the editor-in-chief position.</span> </td> <td> <span>+ Before becoming editor in chief, Lee had been a sports writer for The Aggie.</span> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> Line 5: </td> <td> Line 5: </td> </tr> <tr> <td> <span>- Hamilton and Everidge did not introduce this training, called "senior staff writing," specifically for Lee. It has been included in The Aggie's budget for years and is standard training for those ascending in rank at The Aggie. (For example, Marion Everidge trained as a senior staff writer for two weeks in May 2006 for the managing editor position.) Though Lee had not written stories for the campus or city desks, every Aggie reporter is explicitly warned, upon his or her employment, that plagiarism is strictly forbidden and leads to immediate termination at The Aggie.<br> - <br> - It is important to note, however, that Aggie Sports Writers like Lee don't usually deal with press releases, and some of the Aggie staff felt that he was not given the necessary tools or enough briefing that is usually given to those who write for other desks (like campus, city and science) that use press releases. Also, Lee technically only had one source, the press release itself, and some members of the staff felt that it was a suspicious oversight on ["Talia Kennedy" Kennedy's] part since writers are told they need three sources. Whether or not her oversight was purposeful will always remain a mystery.</span> </td> <td> <span>+ Some controversy surrounded a story he plagiarized for the paper while undergoing training to be editor in chief in May 2007. Lee admitted to plagiarizing and was fired on May 9, 2007. But he was reinstated a few days later after some staff members complained that they thought his training was a set-up, though the training was part of standard procedure for incoming staff members. For more information, see the ["The California Aggie Controversies"] page.</span> </td> </tr> </table> </div> Eddie Leehttp://daviswiki.org/Eddie_Lee2008-05-28 17:21:06PhilipNeustromRevert to version 25 (a large amount of information was removed w/o explaination). <div id="content" class="wikipage content"> Differences for Eddie Lee<p><strong></strong></p><table> <tr> <td> <span> Deletions are marked with - . </span> </td> <td> <span> Additions are marked with +. </span> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> Line 1: </td> <td> Line 1: </td> </tr> <tr> <td> <span>- '''Eddie Lee''' serves as Editor in Chief of ["The California Aggie"] for the 2007-2008 school year. He is a senior majoring in communication.</span> </td> <td> <span>+ '''Eddie Lee''' is the current Editor in Chief of ["The California Aggie"]. Lee was a sports writer for the Aggie for about one year (2006 - May 2007) before being selected by the ["Campus Media Board"] to be editor in chief of the paper for the 2007-2008 school year. In his first story as a senior staff writer, part of his training to be editor in chief, Eddie Lee plagiarized from a press release, an offense he admitted to and was fired for on May 9, 2007. After controversy erupted at The Aggie (see ["The California Aggie Controversies"] for more information), ["Marion Everidge"] was named interim editor in chief and subsequently reinstated Eddie Lee as a senior staff writer on May 17, 2007. This is the first time a writer has been allowed to continue working for The Aggie after committing plagiarism, although plagiarizing a press release is typically something that only mandates a warning in major newspapers such as ["The Sacramento Bee"].</span> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> Line 3: </td> <td> Line 3: </td> </tr> <tr> <td> <span>- Before becoming editor in chief, Lee had been a sports writer for The Aggie.</span> </td> <td> <span>+ Some Aggie staff members speculated that ["Marion Everidge"] and ["Peter Hamilton"] structured Lee's training so that he would fail and they could fire him. Included in this training were assignments that required him to turn in stories within 15 hours (7 p.m. to 2 p.m.) for the city and campus desks, with which he was not familiar. The way that this training was structured is unique, and some construed it as a way to entrap Lee. Signers of the petition against Hamilton and ["Talia Kennedy"] suspected that Lee was set up to be fired so Kennedy could apply for the editor-in-chief position.</span> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> Line 5: </td> <td> Line 5: </td> </tr> <tr> <td> <span>- Some controversy surrounded a story he plagiarized for the paper while undergoing training to be editor in chief in May 2007. Lee admitted to plagiarizing and was fired on May 9, 2007. But he was reinstated a few days later after some staff members complained that they thought his training was a set-up, though the training was part of standard procedure for incoming staff members. For more information, see the ["The California Aggie Controversies"] page.</span> </td> <td> <span>+ Hamilton and Everidge did not introduce this training, called "senior staff writing," specifically for Lee. It has been included in The Aggie's budget for years and is standard training for those ascending in rank at The Aggie. (For example, Marion Everidge trained as a senior staff writer for two weeks in May 2006 for the managing editor position.) Though Lee had not written stories for the campus or city desks, every Aggie reporter is explicitly warned, upon his or her employment, that plagiarism is strictly forbidden and leads to immediate termination at The Aggie.<br> + <br> + It is important to note, however, that Aggie Sports Writers like Lee don't usually deal with press releases, and some of the Aggie staff felt that he was not given the necessary tools or enough briefing that is usually given to those who write for other desks (like campus, city and science) that use press releases. Also, Lee technically only had one source, the press release itself, and some members of the staff felt that it was a suspicious oversight on ["Talia Kennedy" Kennedy's] part since writers are told they need three sources. Whether or not her oversight was purposeful will always remain a mystery.</span> </td> </tr> </table> </div> Eddie Leehttp://daviswiki.org/Eddie_Lee2008-05-28 17:06:24PS2clean up...it's time to move on! <div id="content" class="wikipage content"> Differences for Eddie Lee<p><strong></strong></p><table> <tr> <td> <span> Deletions are marked with - . </span> </td> <td> <span> Additions are marked with +. </span> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> Line 1: </td> <td> Line 1: </td> </tr> <tr> <td> <span>- '''Eddie Lee''' is the current Editor in Chief of ["The California Aggie"]. Lee was a sports writer for the Aggie for about one year (2006 - May 2007) before being selected by the ["Campus Media Board"] to be editor in chief of the paper for the 2007-2008 school year. In his first story as a senior staff writer, part of his training to be editor in chief, Eddie Lee plagiarized from a press release, an offense he admitted to and was fired for on May 9, 2007. After controversy erupted at The Aggie (see ["The California Aggie Controversies"] for more information), ["Marion Everidge"] was named interim editor in chief and subsequently reinstated Eddie Lee as a senior staff writer on May 17, 2007. This is the first time a writer has been allowed to continue working for The Aggie after committing plagiarism, although plagiarizing a press release is typically something that only mandates a warning in major newspapers such as ["The Sacramento Bee"].</span> </td> <td> <span>+ '''Eddie Lee''' serves as Editor in Chief of ["The California Aggie"] for the 2007-2008 school year. He is a senior majoring in communication.</span> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> Line 3: </td> <td> Line 3: </td> </tr> <tr> <td> <span>- Some Aggie staff members speculated that ["Marion Everidge"] and ["Peter Hamilton"] structured Lee's training so that he would fail and they could fire him. Included in this training were assignments that required him to turn in stories within 15 hours (7 p.m. to 2 p.m.) for the city and campus desks, with which he was not familiar. The way that this training was structured is unique, and some construed it as a way to entrap Lee. Signers of the petition against Hamilton and ["Talia Kennedy"] suspected that Lee was set up to be fired so Kennedy could apply for the editor-in-chief position.</span> </td> <td> <span>+ Before becoming editor in chief, Lee had been a sports writer for The Aggie.</span> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> Line 5: </td> <td> Line 5: </td> </tr> <tr> <td> <span>- Hamilton and Everidge did not introduce this training, called "senior staff writing," specifically for Lee. It has been included in The Aggie's budget for years and is standard training for those ascending in rank at The Aggie. (For example, Marion Everidge trained as a senior staff writer for two weeks in May 2006 for the managing editor position.) Though Lee had not written stories for the campus or city desks, every Aggie reporter is explicitly warned, upon his or her employment, that plagiarism is strictly forbidden and leads to immediate termination at The Aggie.<br> - <br> - It is important to note, however, that Aggie Sports Writers like Lee don't usually deal with press releases, and some of the Aggie staff felt that he was not given the necessary tools or enough briefing that is usually given to those who write for other desks (like campus, city and science) that use press releases. Also, Lee technically only had one source, the press release itself, and some members of the staff felt that it was a suspicious oversight on ["Talia Kennedy" Kennedy's] part since writers are told they need three sources. Whether or not her oversight was purposeful will always remain a mystery.</span> </td> <td> <span>+ Some controversy surrounded a story he plagiarized for the paper while undergoing training to be editor in chief in May 2007. Lee admitted to plagiarizing and was fired on May 9, 2007. But he was reinstated a few days later after some staff members complained that they thought his training was a set-up, though the training was part of standard procedure for incoming staff members. For more information, see the ["The California Aggie Controversies"] page.</span> </td> </tr> </table> </div> Eddie Leehttp://daviswiki.org/Eddie_Lee2007-06-20 11:58:34BrentLaabsmoved most important fact to the front <div id="content" class="wikipage content"> Differences for Eddie Lee<p><strong></strong></p><table> <tr> <td> <span> Deletions are marked with - . </span> </td> <td> <span> Additions are marked with +. </span> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> Line 1: </td> <td> Line 1: </td> </tr> <tr> <td> <span>-</span> '''Eddie Lee''' <span>was a sports writer for</span> ["The California Aggie"] for about one year (2006 - May 2007) before being selected by the ["Campus Media Board"] to be editor in chief of the paper for the 2007-2008 school year. In his first story as a senior staff writer, part of his training to be editor in chief, Eddie Lee plagiarized from a press release, an offense he admitted to and was fired for on May 9, 2007. After controversy erupted at The Aggie (see ["The California Aggie Controversies"] for more information), ["Marion Everidge"] was named interim editor in chief and subsequently reinstated Eddie Lee as a senior staff writer on May 17, 2007. This is the first time a writer has been allowed to continue working for The Aggie after committing plagiarism, although plagiarizing a press release is typically something that only mandates a warning in major newspapers such as ["The Sacramento Bee"]. </td> <td> <span>+</span> '''Eddie Lee''' <span>is the current Editor in Chief of</span> ["The California Aggie"]<span>. Lee was a sports writer for the Aggie</span> for about one year (2006 - May 2007) before being selected by the ["Campus Media Board"] to be editor in chief of the paper for the 2007-2008 school year. In his first story as a senior staff writer, part of his training to be editor in chief, Eddie Lee plagiarized from a press release, an offense he admitted to and was fired for on May 9, 2007. After controversy erupted at The Aggie (see ["The California Aggie Controversies"] for more information), ["Marion Everidge"] was named interim editor in chief and subsequently reinstated Eddie Lee as a senior staff writer on May 17, 2007. This is the first time a writer has been allowed to continue working for The Aggie after committing plagiarism, although plagiarizing a press release is typically something that only mandates a warning in major newspapers such as ["The Sacramento Bee"]. </td> </tr> </table> </div> Eddie Leehttp://daviswiki.org/Eddie_Lee2007-05-20 17:34:09WilliamLewisRevert to version 22 (No point in removing what people thought.). <div id="content" class="wikipage content"> Differences for Eddie Lee<p><strong></strong></p><table> <tr> <td> <span> Deletions are marked with - . </span> </td> <td> <span> Additions are marked with +. </span> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> Line 3: </td> <td> Line 3: </td> </tr> <tr> <td> <span>-</span> E<span>ddie began his training for EIC as a senior staff writer</span>. Included in this training were assignments that required him to turn in stories within 15 hours (7 p.m. to 2 p.m.) for the city and campus desks, with which he was not familiar. The way that this training was structured is unique, and some construed it as a way to entrap Lee. Signers of the petition against Hamilton and ["Talia Kennedy"] suspected that Lee was set up to be fired so Kennedy could apply for the editor-in-chief position. </td> <td> <span>+ Some Aggie staff members speculated that ["Marion</span> E<span>veridge"] and ["Peter Hamilton"] structured Lee's training so that he would fail and they could fire him</span>. Included in this training were assignments that required him to turn in stories within 15 hours (7 p.m. to 2 p.m.) for the city and campus desks, with which he was not familiar. The way that this training was structured is unique, and some construed it as a way to entrap Lee. Signers of the petition against Hamilton and ["Talia Kennedy"] suspected that Lee was set up to be fired so Kennedy could apply for the editor-in-chief position. </td> </tr> <tr> <td> Line 5: </td> <td> Line 5: </td> </tr> <tr> <td> <span>-</span> It has been included in The Aggie's budget for years and is standard training for those ascending in rank at The Aggie. (For example, Marion Everidge trained as a senior staff writer for two weeks in May 2006 for the managing editor position.) Though Lee had not written stories for the campus or city desks, every Aggie reporter is explicitly warned, upon his or her employment, that plagiarism is strictly forbidden and leads to immediate termination at The Aggie. </td> <td> <span>+ Hamilton and Everidge did not introduce this training, called "senior staff writing," specifically for Lee.</span> It has been included in The Aggie's budget for years and is standard training for those ascending in rank at The Aggie. (For example, Marion Everidge trained as a senior staff writer for two weeks in May 2006 for the managing editor position.) Though Lee had not written stories for the campus or city desks, every Aggie reporter is explicitly warned, upon his or her employment, that plagiarism is strictly forbidden and leads to immediate termination at The Aggie. </td> </tr> </table> </div> Eddie Leehttp://daviswiki.org/Eddie_Lee2007-05-20 17:11:25MarionEveridge <div id="content" class="wikipage content"> Differences for Eddie Lee<p><strong></strong></p><table> <tr> <td> <span> Deletions are marked with - . </span> </td> <td> <span> Additions are marked with +. </span> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> Line 3: </td> <td> Line 3: </td> </tr> <tr> <td> <span>- Some Aggie staff mem</span>be<span>rs speculated that ["Marion</span> E<span>veridge"] and ["Peter Hamilton"] structured Lee's training so that he would fail and they could fire him</span>. Included in this training were assignments that required him to turn in stories within 15 hours (7 p.m. to 2 p.m.) for the city and campus desks, with which he was not familiar. The way that this training was structured is unique, and some construed it as a way to entrap Lee. Signers of the petition against Hamilton and ["Talia Kennedy"] suspected that Lee was set up to be fired so Kennedy could apply for the editor-in-chief position. </td> <td> <span>+ Eddie </span>be<span>gan his training for</span> E<span>IC as a senior staff writer</span>. Included in this training were assignments that required him to turn in stories within 15 hours (7 p.m. to 2 p.m.) for the city and campus desks, with which he was not familiar. The way that this training was structured is unique, and some construed it as a way to entrap Lee. Signers of the petition against Hamilton and ["Talia Kennedy"] suspected that Lee was set up to be fired so Kennedy could apply for the editor-in-chief position. </td> </tr> <tr> <td> Line 5: </td> <td> Line 5: </td> </tr> <tr> <td> <span>- Hamilton and Everidge did not introduce this training, called "senior staff writing," specifically for Lee.</span> It has been included in The Aggie's budget for years and is standard training for those ascending in rank at The Aggie. (For example, Marion Everidge trained as a senior staff writer for two weeks in May 2006 for the managing editor position.) Though Lee had not written stories for the campus or city desks, every Aggie reporter is explicitly warned, upon his or her employment, that plagiarism is strictly forbidden and leads to immediate termination at The Aggie. </td> <td> <span>+</span> It has been included in The Aggie's budget for years and is standard training for those ascending in rank at The Aggie. (For example, Marion Everidge trained as a senior staff writer for two weeks in May 2006 for the managing editor position.) Though Lee had not written stories for the campus or city desks, every Aggie reporter is explicitly warned, upon his or her employment, that plagiarism is strictly forbidden and leads to immediate termination at The Aggie. </td> </tr> </table> </div> Eddie Leehttp://daviswiki.org/Eddie_Lee2007-05-19 10:57:15KrisFrickeminor organizational <div id="content" class="wikipage content"> Differences for Eddie Lee<p><strong></strong></p><table> <tr> <td> <span> Deletions are marked with - . </span> </td> <td> <span> Additions are marked with +. </span> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> Line 1: </td> <td> Line 1: </td> </tr> <tr> <td> <span>-</span> '''Eddie Lee''' was a sports writer for ["The California Aggie"] for about one year (2006 - May 2007) before being selected by the ["Campus Media Board"] to be editor in chief of the paper for the 2007-2008 school year. In his first story as a senior staff writer, part of his training to be editor in chief, Eddie Lee plagiarized, an offense he admitted to and was fired for on May 9, 2007. After controversy erupted at The Aggie (see ["The California Aggie Controversies"] for more information), ["Marion Everidge"] was named interim editor in chief and subsequently reinstated Eddie Lee as a senior staff writer on May 17, 2007. This is the first time a writer has been allowed to continue working for The Aggie after committing plagiarism, although plagiarizing a press release is typically something that only mandates a warning in major newspapers such as ["The Sacramento Bee"]. </td> <td> <span>+</span> '''Eddie Lee''' was a sports writer for ["The California Aggie"] for about one year (2006 - May 2007) before being selected by the ["Campus Media Board"] to be editor in chief of the paper for the 2007-2008 school year. In his first story as a senior staff writer, part of his training to be editor in chief, Eddie Lee plagiarized<span>&nbsp;from a press release</span>, an offense he admitted to and was fired for on May 9, 2007. After controversy erupted at The Aggie (see ["The California Aggie Controversies"] for more information), ["Marion Everidge"] was named interim editor in chief and subsequently reinstated Eddie Lee as a senior staff writer on May 17, 2007. This is the first time a writer has been allowed to continue working for The Aggie after committing plagiarism, although plagiarizing a press release is typically something that only mandates a warning in major newspapers such as ["The Sacramento Bee"]. </td> </tr> </table> </div> Eddie Leehttp://daviswiki.org/Eddie_Lee2007-05-19 00:49:43BrentLaabsComment added. <div id="content" class="wikipage content"> Differences for Eddie Lee<p><strong></strong></p><table> <tr> <td> <span> Deletions are marked with - . </span> </td> <td> <span> Additions are marked with +. </span> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> Line 13: </td> <td> Line 13: </td> </tr> <tr> <td> </td> <td> <span>+ ------<br> + ''2007-05-19 01:49:43'' [[nbsp]] Nonetheless, the fact that the rumors even got brought up at the Media Board showed a profound disconnect between the Aggie staff. --["Users/BrentLaabs"]</span> </td> </tr> </table> </div> Eddie Leehttp://daviswiki.org/Eddie_Lee2007-05-18 21:33:31JonasMari <div id="content" class="wikipage content"> Differences for Eddie Lee<p><strong></strong></p><table> <tr> <td> <span> Deletions are marked with - . </span> </td> <td> <span> Additions are marked with +. </span> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> Line 7: </td> <td> Line 7: </td> </tr> <tr> <td> </td> <td> <span>+ It is important to note, however, that Aggie Sports Writers like Lee don't usually deal with press releases, and some of the Aggie staff felt that he was not given the necessary tools or enough briefing that is usually given to those who write for other desks (like campus, city and science) that use press releases. Also, Lee technically only had one source, the press release itself, and some members of the staff felt that it was a suspicious oversight on ["Talia Kennedy" Kennedy's] part since writers are told they need three sources. Whether or not her oversight was purposeful will always remain a mystery.<br> + </span> </td> </tr> </table> </div> Eddie Leehttp://daviswiki.org/Eddie_Lee2007-05-18 18:50:19BrianChenComment added. <div id="content" class="wikipage content"> Differences for Eddie Lee<p><strong></strong></p><table> <tr> <td> <span> Deletions are marked with - . </span> </td> <td> <span> Additions are marked with +. </span> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> Line 8: </td> <td> Line 8: </td> </tr> <tr> <td> </td> <td> <span>+ ------<br> + ''2007-05-18 19:50:19'' [[nbsp]] OK -- I'll paste it here then. On the speculation about a "set up" so Talia could take over:<br> + In his letter to the staff, Hamilton explained that Kennedy had no intention to apply for the position before or after the initial termination of Lee. Substantiating his claim, Kennedy confirmed her registration for UC Berkeley's graduate school of journalism for fall of 2007, indicating she had no plans to stay at The Aggie for another year. --["Users/BrianChen"]</span> </td> </tr> </table> </div> Eddie Leehttp://daviswiki.org/Eddie_Lee2007-05-18 18:45:04EdWinstoo much info on each page. this part not relevant to eddie lee. <div id="content" class="wikipage content"> Differences for Eddie Lee<p><strong></strong></p><table> <tr> <td> <span> Deletions are marked with - . </span> </td> <td> <span> Additions are marked with +. </span> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> Line 7: </td> <td> Line 7: </td> </tr> <tr> <td> <span>- In his letter to the staff, Hamilton explained that Kennedy had no intention to apply for the position before or after the initial termination of Lee. Substantiating his claim, Kennedy confirmed her registration for UC Berkeley's graduate school of journalism for fall of 2007, indicating she had no plans to stay at The Aggie for another year.<br> - </span> </td> <td> </td> </tr> </table> </div> Eddie Leehttp://daviswiki.org/Eddie_Lee2007-05-18 18:23:14BrianChenformatting <div id="content" class="wikipage content"> Differences for Eddie Lee<p><strong></strong></p><table> <tr> <td> <span> Deletions are marked with - . </span> </td> <td> <span> Additions are marked with +. </span> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> Line 3: </td> <td> Line 3: </td> </tr> <tr> <td> <span>-</span> Some Aggie staff members speculated that ["Marion Everidge"] and ["Peter Hamilton"] structured Lee's training so that he would fail and they could fire him. Included in this training were assignments that required him to turn in stories within 15 hours (7 p.m. to 2 p.m.) for the city and campus desks, with which he was not familiar. The way that this training was structured is unique, and some construed it as a way to entrap Lee. Signers of the petition against Hamilton and [<span>'''</span>Talia Kennedy<span>'''</span>] suspected that Lee was set up to be fired so Kennedy could apply for the editor-in-chief position. </td> <td> <span>+</span> Some Aggie staff members speculated that ["Marion Everidge"] and ["Peter Hamilton"] structured Lee's training so that he would fail and they could fire him. Included in this training were assignments that required him to turn in stories within 15 hours (7 p.m. to 2 p.m.) for the city and campus desks, with which he was not familiar. The way that this training was structured is unique, and some construed it as a way to entrap Lee. Signers of the petition against Hamilton and [<span>"</span>Talia Kennedy<span>"</span>] suspected that Lee was set up to be fired so Kennedy could apply for the editor-in-chief position. </td> </tr> </table> </div> Eddie Leehttp://daviswiki.org/Eddie_Lee2007-05-18 18:20:43BrianChenWell, here you go, then. A nice and balanced edit -- which I was planning to do. <div id="content" class="wikipage content"> Differences for Eddie Lee<p><strong></strong></p><table> <tr> <td> <span> Deletions are marked with - . </span> </td> <td> <span> Additions are marked with +. </span> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> Line 3: </td> <td> Line 3: </td> </tr> <tr> <td> <span>- However, this may not have been entirely his fault, as there are widespread rumors that the training for editor in chief that Lee received from ["Marion Everidge"] and ["Peter Hamilton"] was structured in such a way to cause him to fail. Included in this training were assignments that caused him to turn in stories within 15 hours (7 p.m. to 2 p.m.) for the city and campus departments, departments with which he was not familiar. Hamilton and Everidge did not introduce this training specifically for Eddie Lee. It has been included in The Aggie's budget for years and is standard training for those ascending in rank at The Aggie. For example, Marion Everidge trained as a senior staff writer for two weeks in May 2006 for the managing editor position. However, the way that this training was structured is unique, and could easily be construed as a way to entrap Lee -- perhaps, as some of the Aggie staff said, to allow Kennedy to assume the position of editor in chief.</span> </td> <td> <span>+ Some Aggie staff members speculated that ["Marion Everidge"] and ["Peter Hamilton"] structured Lee's training so that he would fail and they could fire him. Included in this training were assignments that required him to turn in stories within 15 hours (7 p.m. to 2 p.m.) for the city and campus desks, with which he was not familiar. The way that this training was structured is unique, and some construed it as a way to entrap Lee. Signers of the petition against Hamilton and ['''Talia Kennedy'''] suspected that Lee was set up to be fired so Kennedy could apply for the editor-in-chief position.<br> + <br> + Hamilton and Everidge did not introduce this training, called "senior staff writing," specifically for Lee. It has been included in The Aggie's budget for years and is standard training for those ascending in rank at The Aggie. (For example, Marion Everidge trained as a senior staff writer for two weeks in May 2006 for the managing editor position.) Though Lee had not written stories for the campus or city desks, every Aggie reporter is explicitly warned, upon his or her employment, that plagiarism is strictly forbidden and leads to immediate termination at The Aggie.<br> + <br> + In his letter to the staff, Hamilton explained that Kennedy had no intention to apply for the position before or after the initial termination of Lee. Substantiating his claim, Kennedy confirmed her registration for UC Berkeley's graduate school of journalism for fall of 2007, indicating she had no plans to stay at The Aggie for another year.</span> </td> </tr> </table> </div> Eddie Leehttp://daviswiki.org/Eddie_Lee2007-05-18 18:02:16WilliamLewisRevert to version 13 (The rumors are out there, factual or not.). <div id="content" class="wikipage content"> Differences for Eddie Lee<p><strong></strong></p><table> <tr> <td> <span> Deletions are marked with - . </span> </td> <td> <span> Additions are marked with +. </span> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> Line 3: </td> <td> Line 3: </td> </tr> <tr> <td> </td> <td> <span>+ However, this may not have been entirely his fault, as there are widespread rumors that the training for editor in chief that Lee received from ["Marion Everidge"] and ["Peter Hamilton"] was structured in such a way to cause him to fail. Included in this training were assignments that caused him to turn in stories within 15 hours (7 p.m. to 2 p.m.) for the city and campus departments, departments with which he was not familiar. Hamilton and Everidge did not introduce this training specifically for Eddie Lee. It has been included in The Aggie's budget for years and is standard training for those ascending in rank at The Aggie. For example, Marion Everidge trained as a senior staff writer for two weeks in May 2006 for the managing editor position. However, the way that this training was structured is unique, and could easily be construed as a way to entrap Lee -- perhaps, as some of the Aggie staff said, to allow Kennedy to assume the position of editor in chief.<br> + </span> </td> </tr> </table> </div> Eddie Leehttp://daviswiki.org/Eddie_Lee2007-05-18 17:54:27BrianChenLudicrous rumors. I'll explain in my comment. <div id="content" class="wikipage content"> Differences for Eddie Lee<p><strong></strong></p><table> <tr> <td> <span> Deletions are marked with - . </span> </td> <td> <span> Additions are marked with +. </span> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> Line 3: </td> <td> Line 3: </td> </tr> <tr> <td> <span>- However, this may not have been entirely his fault, as there are widespread rumors that the training for editor in chief that Lee received from ["Marion Everidge"] and ["Peter Hamilton"] was structured in such a way to cause him to fail. Included in this training were assignments that caused him to turn in stories within 15 hours (7 p.m. to 2 p.m.) for the city and campus departments, departments with which he was not familiar. Hamilton and Everidge did not introduce this training specifically for Eddie Lee. It has been included in The Aggie's budget for years and is standard training for those ascending in rank at The Aggie. For example, Marion Everidge trained as a senior staff writer for two weeks in May 2006 for the managing editor position. However, the way that this training was structured is unique, and could easily be construed as a way to entrap Lee -- perhaps, as some of the Aggie staff said, to allow Kennedy to assume the position of editor in chief.<br> - </span> </td> <td> </td> </tr> </table> </div> Eddie Leehttp://daviswiki.org/Eddie_Lee2007-05-18 17:37:52BrianChenComment box <div id="content" class="wikipage content"> Differences for Eddie Lee<p><strong></strong></p><table> <tr> <td> <span> Deletions are marked with - . </span> </td> <td> <span> Additions are marked with +. </span> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> Line 4: </td> <td> Line 4: </td> </tr> <tr> <td> </td> <td> <span>+ <br> + [[Comments(Comments)]]</span> </td> </tr> </table> </div> Eddie Leehttp://daviswiki.org/Eddie_Lee2007-05-18 15:02:38WilliamLewis(quick edit) <div id="content" class="wikipage content"> Differences for Eddie Lee<p><strong></strong></p><table> <tr> <td> <span> Deletions are marked with - . </span> </td> <td> <span> Additions are marked with +. </span> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> Line 3: </td> <td> Line 3: </td> </tr> <tr> <td> <span>-</span> However, this may not have been entirely his fault, as there are widespread rumors that the training for editor in chief that Lee received from ["Marion Everidge"] and ["Peter Hamilton"] was structured in such a way to cause him to fail. Included in this training were assignments that caused him to turn in stories within 15 hours (7 p.m. to 2 p.m.) for the city and campus departments, departments with which he was not familiar. Hamilton and Everidge did not introduce this training specifically for Eddie Lee. It has been included in The Aggie's budget for years and is standard training for those ascending in rank at The Aggie. For example, Marion Everidge trained as a senior staff writer for two weeks in May 2006 for the managing editor position. However, the way that this training was structure is unique, and could easily be construed as a way to entrap Lee -- perhaps, as some of the Aggie staff said, to allow Kennedy to assume the position of editor in chief. </td> <td> <span>+</span> However, this may not have been entirely his fault, as there are widespread rumors that the training for editor in chief that Lee received from ["Marion Everidge"] and ["Peter Hamilton"] was structured in such a way to cause him to fail. Included in this training were assignments that caused him to turn in stories within 15 hours (7 p.m. to 2 p.m.) for the city and campus departments, departments with which he was not familiar. Hamilton and Everidge did not introduce this training specifically for Eddie Lee. It has been included in The Aggie's budget for years and is standard training for those ascending in rank at The Aggie. For example, Marion Everidge trained as a senior staff writer for two weeks in May 2006 for the managing editor position. However, the way that this training was structure<span>d</span> is unique, and could easily be construed as a way to entrap Lee -- perhaps, as some of the Aggie staff said, to allow Kennedy to assume the position of editor in chief. </td> </tr> </table> </div> Eddie Leehttp://daviswiki.org/Eddie_Lee2007-05-18 15:01:16WilliamLewis(quick edit) <div id="content" class="wikipage content"> Differences for Eddie Lee<p><strong></strong></p><table> <tr> <td> <span> Deletions are marked with - . </span> </td> <td> <span> Additions are marked with +. </span> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> Line 3: </td> <td> Line 3: </td> </tr> <tr> <td> <span>-</span> However, this may not have been entirely his fault, as there are widespread rumors that the training for editor in chief that Lee received from ["Marion Everidge"] and ["Peter Hamilton"] was structured in such a way to cause him to fail. Included in this training were assignments that caused him to turn in stories within 15 hours (7 p.m. to 2 p.m.) for the city and campus departments, departments with which he was not familiar. <span>"</span>Hamilton and Everidge did not introduce this training specifically for Eddie Lee. It has been included in The Aggie's budget for years and is standard training for those ascending in rank at The Aggie. For example, Marion Everidge trained as a senior staff writer for two weeks in May 2006 for the managing editor position.<span>"</span> However, the way that this training was structure is unique, and could easily be construed as a way to entrap Lee -- perhaps, as some of the Aggie staff said, to allow Kennedy to assume the position of editor in chief. </td> <td> <span>+</span> However, this may not have been entirely his fault, as there are widespread rumors that the training for editor in chief that Lee received from ["Marion Everidge"] and ["Peter Hamilton"] was structured in such a way to cause him to fail. Included in this training were assignments that caused him to turn in stories within 15 hours (7 p.m. to 2 p.m.) for the city and campus departments, departments with which he was not familiar. Hamilton and Everidge did not introduce this training specifically for Eddie Lee. It has been included in The Aggie's budget for years and is standard training for those ascending in rank at The Aggie. For example, Marion Everidge trained as a senior staff writer for two weeks in May 2006 for the managing editor position. However, the way that this training was structure is unique, and could easily be construed as a way to entrap Lee -- perhaps, as some of the Aggie staff said, to allow Kennedy to assume the position of editor in chief. </td> </tr> </table> </div> Eddie Leehttp://daviswiki.org/Eddie_Lee2007-05-18 14:13:46GeoffJohnsonFixed link <div id="content" class="wikipage content"> Differences for Eddie Lee<p><strong></strong></p><table> <tr> <td> <span> Deletions are marked with - . </span> </td> <td> <span> Additions are marked with +. </span> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> Line 1: </td> <td> Line 1: </td> </tr> <tr> <td> <span>-</span> '''Eddie Lee''' was a sports writer for ["The California Aggie"] for about one year (2006 - May 2007) before being selected by the ["Campus Media Board"] to be editor in chief of the paper for the 2007-2008 school year. In his first story as a senior staff writer, part of his training to be editor in chief, Eddie Lee plagiarized, an offense he admitted to and was fired for on May 9, 2007. After controversy erupted at The Aggie (see ["The California Aggie Controversies"] for more information), ["Marion Everidge"] was named interim editor in chief and subsequently reinstated Eddie Lee as a senior staff writer on May 17, 2007. This is the first time a writer has been allowed to continue working for The Aggie after committing plagiarism, although plagiarizing a press release is typically something that only mandates a warning in major newspapers such as [<span>[''</span>The Sacramento Bee<span>'']</span>]. </td> <td> <span>+</span> '''Eddie Lee''' was a sports writer for ["The California Aggie"] for about one year (2006 - May 2007) before being selected by the ["Campus Media Board"] to be editor in chief of the paper for the 2007-2008 school year. In his first story as a senior staff writer, part of his training to be editor in chief, Eddie Lee plagiarized, an offense he admitted to and was fired for on May 9, 2007. After controversy erupted at The Aggie (see ["The California Aggie Controversies"] for more information), ["Marion Everidge"] was named interim editor in chief and subsequently reinstated Eddie Lee as a senior staff writer on May 17, 2007. This is the first time a writer has been allowed to continue working for The Aggie after committing plagiarism, although plagiarizing a press release is typically something that only mandates a warning in major newspapers such as [<span>"</span>The Sacramento Bee<span>"</span>]. </td> </tr> </table> </div> Eddie Leehttp://daviswiki.org/Eddie_Lee2007-05-18 14:11:12GeoffJohnsonMore factual information <div id="content" class="wikipage content"> Differences for Eddie Lee<p><strong></strong></p><table> <tr> <td> <span> Deletions are marked with - . </span> </td> <td> <span> Additions are marked with +. </span> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> Line 1: </td> <td> Line 1: </td> </tr> <tr> <td> <span>-</span> '''Eddie Lee''' was a sports writer for ["The California Aggie"] for about one year (2006 - May 2007) before being selected by the ["Campus Media Board"] to be editor in chief of the paper for the 2007-2008 school year. In his first story as a senior staff writer, part of his training to be editor in chief, Eddie Lee plagiarized, an offense he admitted to and was fired for on May 9, 2007. After controversy erupted at The Aggie (see ["The California Aggie Controversies"] for more information), ["Marion Everidge"] was named interim editor in chief and subsequently reinstated Eddie Lee as a senior staff writer on May 17, 2007. <span>It now appears a self-admitted plagiarist will serve as editor in chief of </span>The Aggie <span>for the 2007-2008 school year</span>.<span><br> - </span> </td> <td> <span>+</span> '''Eddie Lee''' was a sports writer for ["The California Aggie"] for about one year (2006 - May 2007) before being selected by the ["Campus Media Board"] to be editor in chief of the paper for the 2007-2008 school year. In his first story as a senior staff writer, part of his training to be editor in chief, Eddie Lee plagiarized, an offense he admitted to and was fired for on May 9, 2007. After controversy erupted at The Aggie (see ["The California Aggie Controversies"] for more information), ["Marion Everidge"] was named interim editor in chief and subsequently reinstated Eddie Lee as a senior staff writer on May 17, 2007. Th<span>is is the first time a writer has been allowed to continue working for Th</span>e Aggie <span>after committing plagiarism, although plagiarizing a press release is typically something that only mandates a warning in major newspapers such as [[''The Sacramento Bee'']]</span>. </td> </tr> </table> </div> Eddie Leehttp://daviswiki.org/Eddie_Lee2007-05-18 13:45:34BrentLaabsrm edit conflict <div id="content" class="wikipage content"> Differences for Eddie Lee<p><strong></strong></p><table> <tr> <td> <span> Deletions are marked with - . </span> </td> <td> <span> Additions are marked with +. </span> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> Line 3: </td> <td> Line 3: </td> </tr> <tr> <td> <span>- ----- /!\ Edit conflict! Other version: -----</span> </td> <td> <span>+ </span> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> Line 5: </td> <td> Line 5: </td> </tr> <tr> <td> <span>- ----- /!\ Edit conflict! Your version: -----<br> - However, this may not have been entirely his fault, as there are widespread rumors that the training for editor in chief that Lee received from ["Marion Everidge"] and ["Peter Hamilton"] was structured in such a way to cause him to fail. Included in this training were assignments that caused him to turn in stories within 15 hours (7 p.m. to 2 p.m.) for the city and campus departments, departments with which he was not familiar. ''Hamilton and Everidge did not introduce this training specifically for Eddie Lee. It has been included in The Aggie's budget for years and is standard training for those ascending in rank at The Aggie. For example, Marion Everidge trained as a senior staff writer for two weeks in May 2006 for the managing editor position.''<br> - ----- /!\ End of edit conflict -----</span> </td> <td> </td> </tr> </table> </div> Eddie Leehttp://daviswiki.org/Eddie_Lee2007-05-18 13:45:00BrentLaabsmore factual information <div id="content" class="wikipage content"> Differences for Eddie Lee<p><strong></strong></p><table> <tr> <td> <span> Deletions are marked with - . </span> </td> <td> <span> Additions are marked with +. </span> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> Line 3: </td> <td> Line 3: </td> </tr> <tr> <td> </td> <td> <span>+ ----- /!\ Edit conflict! Other version: -----<br> + However, this may not have been entirely his fault, as there are widespread rumors that the training for editor in chief that Lee received from ["Marion Everidge"] and ["Peter Hamilton"] was structured in such a way to cause him to fail. Included in this training were assignments that caused him to turn in stories within 15 hours (7 p.m. to 2 p.m.) for the city and campus departments, departments with which he was not familiar. "Hamilton and Everidge did not introduce this training specifically for Eddie Lee. It has been included in The Aggie's budget for years and is standard training for those ascending in rank at The Aggie. For example, Marion Everidge trained as a senior staff writer for two weeks in May 2006 for the managing editor position." However, the way that this training was structure is unique, and could easily be construed as a way to entrap Lee -- perhaps, as some of the Aggie staff said, to allow Kennedy to assume the position of editor in chief.<br> + ----- /!\ Edit conflict! Your version: -----</span> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> Line 4: </td> <td> Line 7: </td> </tr> <tr> <td> </td> <td> <span>+ ----- /!\ End of edit conflict -----</span> </td> </tr> </table> </div> Eddie Leehttp://daviswiki.org/Eddie_Lee2007-05-18 13:42:50TravisBrownminor - format <div id="content" class="wikipage content"> Differences for Eddie Lee<p><strong></strong></p><table> <tr> <td> <span> Deletions are marked with - . </span> </td> <td> <span> Additions are marked with +. </span> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> Line 3: </td> <td> Line 3: </td> </tr> <tr> <td> <span>-</span> However, this may not have been entirely his fault, as there are widespread rumors that the training for editor in chief that Lee received from ["Marion Everidge"] and ["Peter Hamilton"] was structured in such a way to cause him to fail. Included in this training were assignments that caused him to turn in stories within 15 hours (7 p.m. to 2 p.m.) for the city and campus departments, departments with which he was not familiar. <span>"</span>Hamilton and Everidge did not introduce this training specifically for Eddie Lee. It has been included in The Aggie's budget for years and is standard training for those ascending in rank at The Aggie. For example, Marion Everidge trained as a senior staff writer for two weeks in May 2006 for the managing editor position.<span>"</span> </td> <td> <span>+</span> However, this may not have been entirely his fault, as there are widespread rumors that the training for editor in chief that Lee received from ["Marion Everidge"] and ["Peter Hamilton"] was structured in such a way to cause him to fail. Included in this training were assignments that caused him to turn in stories within 15 hours (7 p.m. to 2 p.m.) for the city and campus departments, departments with which he was not familiar. <span>''</span>Hamilton and Everidge did not introduce this training specifically for Eddie Lee. It has been included in The Aggie's budget for years and is standard training for those ascending in rank at The Aggie. For example, Marion Everidge trained as a senior staff writer for two weeks in May 2006 for the managing editor position.<span>''</span> </td> </tr> </table> </div> Eddie Leehttp://daviswiki.org/Eddie_Lee2007-05-18 13:41:57TravisBrownminor - format <div id="content" class="wikipage content"> Differences for Eddie Lee<p><strong></strong></p><table> <tr> <td> <span> Deletions are marked with - . </span> </td> <td> <span> Additions are marked with +. </span> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> Line 3: </td> <td> Line 3: </td> </tr> <tr> <td> <span>-</span> However, this may not have been entirely his fault, as there are widespread rumors that the training for editor in chief that Lee received from ["Marion Everidge"] and ["Peter Hamilton"] was structured in such a way to cause him to fail. Included in this training were assignments that caused him to turn in stories within 15 hours (7 p.m. to 2 p.m.) for the city and campus departments, departments with which he was not familiar. <span>"</span>"Hamilton and Everidge did not introduce this training specifically for Eddie Lee. It has been included in The Aggie's budget for years and is standard training for those ascending in rank at The Aggie. For example, Marion Everidge trained as a senior staff writer for two weeks in May 2006 for the managing editor position."<span>"</span> </td> <td> <span>+</span> However, this may not have been entirely his fault, as there are widespread rumors that the training for editor in chief that Lee received from ["Marion Everidge"] and ["Peter Hamilton"] was structured in such a way to cause him to fail. Included in this training were assignments that caused him to turn in stories within 15 hours (7 p.m. to 2 p.m.) for the city and campus departments, departments with which he was not familiar. "Hamilton and Everidge did not introduce this training specifically for Eddie Lee. It has been included in The Aggie's budget for years and is standard training for those ascending in rank at The Aggie. For example, Marion Everidge trained as a senior staff writer for two weeks in May 2006 for the managing editor position." </td> </tr> </table> </div> Eddie Leehttp://daviswiki.org/Eddie_Lee2007-05-18 13:41:30TravisBrownAdding factual information <div id="content" class="wikipage content"> Differences for Eddie Lee<p><strong></strong></p><table> <tr> <td> <span> Deletions are marked with - . </span> </td> <td> <span> Additions are marked with +. </span> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> Line 1: </td> <td> Line 1: </td> </tr> <tr> <td> <span>-</span> '''Eddie Lee''' was a sports writer for ["The California Aggie"] for about one year (2006 - May 2007) before being selected by the ["Campus Media Board"] to be editor in chief of the paper for the 2007-2008 school year. In his first story as a senior staff writer, part of his training to be editor in chief, Eddie Lee plagiarized, an offense he admitted to and was fired for on May 9, 2007. After controversy erupted at The Aggie (see ["The California Aggie Controversies"] for more information), ["Marion Everidge"] was named interim editor in chief and subsequently reinstated Eddie Lee as a senior staff writer on May 17, 2007. It now appears a self-admitted plagiarist will serve as editor in chief of The Aggie for the 2007-2008 school year.<span>&nbsp;</span> However, this may not have been entirely his fault, as there are widespread rumors that the training for editor in chief that Lee rec<span>ie</span>ved from ["<span>Talia Kennedy</span>"] and ["Peter Hamilton"] was structured in such a way to cause him to fail. Included in this training were assignments that caused him to turn in stories within 15 hours (7 p.m. to 2 p.m.) for the city and campus departments, departments with which he was not familiar. </td> <td> <span>+</span> '''Eddie Lee''' was a sports writer for ["The California Aggie"] for about one year (2006 - May 2007) before being selected by the ["Campus Media Board"] to be editor in chief of the paper for the 2007-2008 school year. In his first story as a senior staff writer, part of his training to be editor in chief, Eddie Lee plagiarized, an offense he admitted to and was fired for on May 9, 2007. After controversy erupted at The Aggie (see ["The California Aggie Controversies"] for more information), ["Marion Everidge"] was named interim editor in chief and subsequently reinstated Eddie Lee as a senior staff writer on May 17, 2007. It now appears a self-admitted plagiarist will serve as editor in chief of The Aggie for the 2007-2008 school year.<span><br> + <br> +</span> However, this may not have been entirely his fault, as there are widespread rumors that the training for editor in chief that Lee rec<span>ei</span>ved from ["<span>Marion Everidge</span>"] and ["Peter Hamilton"] was structured in such a way to cause him to fail. Included in this training were assignments that caused him to turn in stories within 15 hours (7 p.m. to 2 p.m.) for the city and campus departments, departments with which he was not familiar.<span>&nbsp;""Hamilton and Everidge did not introduce this training specifically for Eddie Lee. It has been included in The Aggie's budget for years and is standard training for those ascending in rank at The Aggie. For example, Marion Everidge trained as a senior staff writer for two weeks in May 2006 for the managing editor position.""</span> </td> </tr> </table> </div> Eddie Leehttp://daviswiki.org/Eddie_Lee2007-05-18 13:35:05BrentLaabsadding more POV <div id="content" class="wikipage content"> Differences for Eddie Lee<p><strong></strong></p><table> <tr> <td> <span> Deletions are marked with - . </span> </td> <td> <span> Additions are marked with +. </span> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> Line 1: </td> <td> Line 1: </td> </tr> <tr> <td> <span>- ||&lt;bgcolor='#E0E0FF'&gt;</span>'''Eddie Lee'''<span>||<br> - <br> - Eddie Lee</span> was a sports writer for ["The California Aggie"] for about one year (2006 - May 2007) before being selected by the ["Campus Media Board"] to be editor in chief of the paper for the 2007-2008 school year. In his first story as a senior staff writer, part of his training to be editor in chief, Eddie Lee plagiarized, an offense he admitted to and was fired for on May 9, 2007. After controversy erupted at The Aggie (see ["The California Aggie Controversies"] for more information), ["Marion Everidge"] was named interim editor in chief and subsequently reinstated Eddie Lee as a senior staff writer on May 17, 2007. It now appears a self-admitted plagiarist will serve as editor in chief of The Aggie for the 2007-2008 school year. </td> <td> <span>+ </span>'''Eddie Lee''' was a sports writer for ["The California Aggie"] for about one year (2006 - May 2007) before being selected by the ["Campus Media Board"] to be editor in chief of the paper for the 2007-2008 school year. In his first story as a senior staff writer, part of his training to be editor in chief, Eddie Lee plagiarized, an offense he admitted to and was fired for on May 9, 2007. After controversy erupted at The Aggie (see ["The California Aggie Controversies"] for more information), ["Marion Everidge"] was named interim editor in chief and subsequently reinstated Eddie Lee as a senior staff writer on May 17, 2007. It now appears a self-admitted plagiarist will serve as editor in chief of The Aggie for the 2007-2008 school year.<span>&nbsp;&nbsp;However, this may not have been entirely his fault, as there are widespread rumors that the training for editor in chief that Lee recieved from ["Talia Kennedy"] and ["Peter Hamilton"] was structured in such a way to cause him to fail. Included in this training were assignments that caused him to turn in stories within 15 hours (7 p.m. to 2 p.m.) for the city and campus departments, departments with which he was not familiar.</span> </td> </tr> </table> </div> Eddie Leehttp://daviswiki.org/Eddie_Lee2007-05-18 13:21:39TravisBrownminor punctuation <div id="content" class="wikipage content"> Differences for Eddie Lee<p><strong></strong></p><table> <tr> <td> <span> Deletions are marked with - . </span> </td> <td> <span> Additions are marked with +. </span> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> Line 3: </td> <td> Line 3: </td> </tr> <tr> <td> <span>-</span> Eddie Lee was a sports writer for ["The California Aggie"] for about one year (2006 - May 2007) before being selected by the ["Campus Media Board"] to be editor in chief of the paper for the 2007-2008 school year. In his first story as a senior staff writer, part of his training to be editor in chief, Eddie Lee plagiarized, an offense he admitted to and was fired for on May 9, 2007. After controversy erupted at The Aggie (see ["The California Aggie Controversies"] for more information, ["Marion Everidge"] was named interim editor in chief and subsequently reinstated Eddie Lee as a senior staff writer on May 17, 2007. It now appears a self-admitted plagiarist will serve as editor in chief of The Aggie for the 2007-2008 school year. </td> <td> <span>+</span> Eddie Lee was a sports writer for ["The California Aggie"] for about one year (2006 - May 2007) before being selected by the ["Campus Media Board"] to be editor in chief of the paper for the 2007-2008 school year. In his first story as a senior staff writer, part of his training to be editor in chief, Eddie Lee plagiarized, an offense he admitted to and was fired for on May 9, 2007. After controversy erupted at The Aggie (see ["The California Aggie Controversies"] for more information<span>)</span>, ["Marion Everidge"] was named interim editor in chief and subsequently reinstated Eddie Lee as a senior staff writer on May 17, 2007. It now appears a self-admitted plagiarist will serve as editor in chief of The Aggie for the 2007-2008 school year. </td> </tr> </table> </div> Eddie Leehttp://daviswiki.org/Eddie_Lee2007-05-18 13:15:20TravisBrownCreating a public page for Eddie Lee <div id="content" class="wikipage content"> Differences for Eddie Lee<p><strong></strong></p><table> <tr> <td> <span> Deletions are marked with - . </span> </td> <td> <span> Additions are marked with +. </span> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> Line 1: </td> <td> Line 1: </td> </tr> <tr> <td> </td> <td> <span>+ ||&lt;bgcolor='#E0E0FF'&gt;'''Eddie Lee'''||<br> + <br> + Eddie Lee was a sports writer for ["The California Aggie"] for about one year (2006 - May 2007) before being selected by the ["Campus Media Board"] to be editor in chief of the paper for the 2007-2008 school year. In his first story as a senior staff writer, part of his training to be editor in chief, Eddie Lee plagiarized, an offense he admitted to and was fired for on May 9, 2007. After controversy erupted at The Aggie (see ["The California Aggie Controversies"] for more information, ["Marion Everidge"] was named interim editor in chief and subsequently reinstated Eddie Lee as a senior staff writer on May 17, 2007. It now appears a self-admitted plagiarist will serve as editor in chief of The Aggie for the 2007-2008 school year.</span> </td> </tr> </table> </div>