| Deletions are marked like this. | Additions are marked like this. |
| Line 70: | Line 70: |
|
Alcohol should NOT be in the Food And Drink section, but in a Poisons or Drugs section or both. Thanks -- ["Users/Michael777"] ---- |
This is NOT the real front page! this is for messing around! Feel free to discuss at the bottom
Discussion
What does everyone think about emphasizing the editablity of the wiki right up at the top of the front page? I think it's important that people know this is a people-created guide, perhaps?
-
It's a good idea. Maybe it can be reworded to be a little more warm though? Maybe: This site is user created: anyone can edit this website! or just putting an exclamation mark in? i don't know...
Proposal: Explore/Public Safety
We neet to add a Public Safety category to the front page - with links to all of the pages reqarding this i.e. Police, Fire, Yolo County Court, etc. for both Davis and UCD — SharlaDaly
Perhaps under "Medical Services, Social Services, Spiritual Organizations, Tax Services"?
No, a page where pages for Police depts, fire depts, Yolo County Court, DA's Office, Public Defender, Probation, Jails, Juvenile Hall, etc. and then maybe related pages (i.e. police misconduct, etc.)- you know, public safety.
Yes, sorry I was unclear: I meant just that it would be nicely placed alongside those items. E.g. "Medical Services, Social Services, Spiritual Organizations, Public Safety, Tax Services"
Oh. Yes, that would fit there nicely.
Proposal: Grand Openings
Hello! I suggest that there be a page for "Grand Openings", including the category of businesses. Would someone like to make it? Thanks. —BruceHansen
How about using the events structure to handle that as any given business is only "Grand Opening" for a short period of time? It also seems to lean a LOT toward using the wiki as unpaid advertising rather than a source of information. —JasonAller
I like the idea of time segments, but the Events Board ony lists per day, which is too short of time for many Grand Openings.
The reader would benefit by receiving the discounts and the internet can be of benefit to its users, rather than being used as a medum for pushed marketing.
Also there possibly could be non-business types of Grand Openings? —BruceHansen
Another way to handle it is like the Varsity Theater or the Bistro 33 did. Someone makes a page about the business (either the owner, or a wiki denzine) and the page generates activity on the Recent Changes along the way toward the grand opening. Do you have an upcoming opening in mind, or was this a general thing? — JasonAller
I was initially wanting to highlight the "Grand Opening" for Hometown Chinese Food. I discovered yesterday when talkinng with HCF owner Steve Lee that he had only done the "grand opening' briefly. Generally I think it's a good idea. —BruceHansen
I'm not sure what should be under 'Explore' (or if the word 'Explore' should be changed or how it could be improved). There could be a new general heading under 'Explore' called 'Enterprises' which would include 'Construction'. —BruceHansen
-
Right now, there's only a minimal amount of content under construction. If someone wanted to know about construction it would be available via the search tool, but there's no reason to feature it on the main page at this time. —BrentLaabs
-
Maybe no 'Construction'. What do you think about "Enterprises'? Clicking on it would show 'Construction' etc.. —BruceHansen
Instead of at the bottom of the Front page there being just a link to a 'title index' there shoud be an index ('site index'?) which includes the headings under 'Explore' etc.. This index would include the contents of the 'title index' and could have a link to the 'title index'. —BruceHansen
Proposal: Simplify the Front Page
Make the page look more like Google. That is all. —RadioNinja
-
You mean like the second paragraph, dead center at the top of the page: "If you're new, check out our Introduction."? That, paired with the entire bottom of the page seems to be good to me. The rest is, like other portal sites like Yahoo (and unlike single purpose sites like Google), pretty well aimed at people looking for things related to Davis, i.e., both visitors with a purpose and visitors looking to poke around. — jw
-
All I'm saying is it could look simpler. Sites like Ask Jeeves are trying to mirror Google in simplicity. I think the Wiki could go simpler. Do we really need an explore section? Can't we have a page with a site map? Or here's a better idea altogether: Do what LiveJournal does in the way that users viewing the Davis Wiki can customize their viewing options. —RadioNinja
-
Customized home pages for users is a wonderful idea. The problem is, if you want it done, you have to do it yourself or convince a specific person to do it. The code for the Wiki is open source if you want to contribute. There's no magic "them" to do things like that. The content of the site, the code of the site... everything here is written by people like you. You could convince the entire Wiki that it's a good idea, but until someone like you actually does it, it's just an idea. Everything on the site is there because somebody thought it was a good idea... and then actually did it. — jw
-
Hey, tell you what: I'll come up with the ideas, and YOU guys put it in action! I have the creative side and you guys know all the computer crap.
-
Why don't you make YOUR page your own customized start page? You can add in whatever you want. (Or create a subpage under your page that is your start page. -KJM
-
How about a front page were you can collapse categories and it saves it using cookies/your account. That way, for those who know their way around can customize things a little more. —mperkel
What do you mean by that? You mean a single search box in the center of the page?
No, no, what I mean is...well, you know how Google is simple? I mean, it's pretty plain and white, but it's professional at the same time. The front page of the Wiki is kind of all around there. It's like, you look two pixels to the left and you're in a new zone. Just make it simple. Have a link for newbies that takes them to a Davis Wiki tutorial page. Hey, someone should create a "Davis Wiki 101" Flash movie! —RadioNinja
Who wants to make a page where people can posts "Looking for roommates" and etc? — JiLiang
The "Getting Started" section may as well not be there, it's buried too far down to be seen or of use for probably nearly everyone's monitor/window size.
Can we get a new featured article? the T-shirt contest ended... —StevenDaubert
search button is needed in the new format. It is one of the most important things on the wiki. —MattHh
Alcohol should NOT be in the Food And Drink section, but in a Poisons or Drugs section or both. Thanks — Michael777
Archived Data
Is the Davis Wiki archived anywhere? I've done a bunch of historical research in Davis for the 1960s, and there's not a lot of info on the day-to-day happenings. We'd be doing future Davisites a favor by archiving the entire wiki once every three months or so. Just store it somewhere for now, no need to put it online until it's a couple years old. —TedBuehler
The plan is to allow for regular "dumps" of the wiki to be downloaded by folks, and then let those folks archive the data as they wish. This is like what wikipedia does.
The wiki structure is such that you can roll back entries to any date you wish. In theory, you can make a bit of software to "roll back" the entire wiki to a given date (absent the very few manually deleted bits, like malicious postings of social security numbers and the like). —JabberWokky
How do I do this? Can I roll back to, say, Jan 1 2006 and see what In 'n Out burger looked like, for instance? —TedBuehler
Something else to think about, from a long-term archivist point of view, is that there are a few things that change like logos, overall site design, and features that won't always make the "roll back" a perfect fit. A historically-fit archive would have to include the software's history, too (the source code repository).
You'd have to write software to do it to the whole wiki, but the Jan 1 2006 In-and-Out entry was at revision 30, which can be viewed ![[WWW]](http://wikispot.org/wiki/eggheadbeta/img/sycamore-www.png){kind=small}
here. You can also hit the image histories and pull their revisions for that date (just hit the "info" button on entries... the In-and-Out one, for instance, is here). Only admins can remove a revision, and I think that's been done under a dozen times in the history of the wiki. I've never done it, Philip removed somebody's social security number that was maliciously posted, if I recall correctly, but it is very rare. The entire history of the wiki is being preserved with only a few exceptions (the logo and appearance is now being preserved since April 2007). Basically, every edit made is being stored, every entry has a full history, although doing a wiki-wide rollback would require writing software to do so (and as pointed out above, some of the markup has changed over the years, so you'd get *exactly* what was saved, which might not display the same with the current version of the software... for instance, images used to be displayed with thumbnail:filename.jpg). In short, the data is being stored, and getting a rough wiki snapshot would be easy... getting a perfect one is possible post-April 2007, I believe (although you'd need a copy of the software history as well if you wanted to display render bugs correctly). —JabberWokky
Oh, and Ted...this is why it is annoying when you "save, save, save"... each save is creating a new revision in the history of that entry. That's specifically why I suggested to that user that they preview. I didn't suggest it for the heck of it. If it weren't having a negative effect on the readability of the entry histories, I wouldn't care if somebody previewed or saved. It is relatively minor, but confusing the histories is generally a bad idea, especially when new editors are trying to puzzle them out. —JabberWokky
Unless somebody thinks this thread belongs here, it might be a good idea to move it to one of the Wiki Community sections, as it doesn't actually relate to the Front Page —jw
Proposal: Active Updates
I'm thinking of moving Lost Pets, Roommates Wanted, Where Can I ... and other 'active engagement' entries to up by events. Are there any others that would make sense? What about Wiki Community, or is that too 'meta'? I'm trying to bring up and highlight the dynamic, continuously updated and/or back and forth entries that are actually being updated on a semi-regular basis (and hopefully by highlighting them they will benefit directly, and they will encourage readers to figure out that they can edit the wiki). Basically, things similar to events in that checking in on them on a semi-regular basis will bring up new things. —jw
-
I think this is a fabulous idea. I am new to the wiki and didn't even know those pages existed, but think they are really helpful. This would make the wiki more engaging. —EmilyHill
-
Unless anybody objects, I'll toss out a starting version in the next day or so. —jw
