Recent Changes for "Infernal Affairs Commission" - Davis Wiki

Infernal Affairs Commission

CameronMenezes — 2009-07-18 08:37:03

Revert to version 31.

Differences for Infernal Affairs Commission

Deletions are marked with - .	Additions are marked with +.
Line 1:	Line 1:
- '' '''Note:''' This is not an actual commission of UCD student government, but a satirically named page with content certain people were opposed to having on the ["Internal Affairs Commission" IAC] page, and is part of a compromise. The name is obviously a humorous play on the name.''	+ '' '''Note:''' "Infernal Affairs Commission is simply a reference to the ["Internal Affairs Commission" IAC], when said Commission members vote in a manner that others find galling. The name is obviously a humorous play on "Internal Affairs Commission.''
Line 3:	Line 3:
- People applying to ["Internal Affairs Commission" IAC] be advised that you might receive somewhat threatening/insulting/patronizing reactions in the course of your job. In most cases, however, the responses are from people who do not fully understand the role of the commission and are almost comical. Here is a recent example that was sent out to not only the commission but most of ASUCD Government as well:	+ People applying to ["Internal Affairs Commission" IAC]: be advised that members of the student body may take issue with your voting decisions.
Line 5:	Line 5:
	+ + {{{
Line 60:	Line 62:
- Steven Ostrowski	+ Cameron Menezes - UC Davis class of 2005 + }}} + + +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ + + Please see "ASUCD Senate Bill #84, ASUCD Information Systems webpage (http://asucd.ucdavis.edu/government/gov-documents/senate-bills/2005-2006) + Please see "ASUCD Senate Bill #12, ASUCD Information Systems webpage (http://asucd.ucdavis.edu/government/gov-documents/senate-bills/2006-2007) + + '''Internal Affairs Commissioners voting to have a voluntary recitation of the Pledge of Allegiance at Senate meetings:''' + ["Joseph Bleckman"] - UC Davis class of 2009 - (Senate Bill#12, fall 2006) + Tom Woelfel - UC Davis class of 2006 - (Senate Bill#84, spring 2006) + + '''Internal Affairs Commissioners voting NOT to have a voluntary recitation of the Pledge of Allegiance at Senate meetings:''' + ["Derick Lennox"] - UC Davis class of 2009 - (Senate Bill#12, fall 2006 & Senate Bill#84, spring 2006) + Mike Rivera - UC Davis class of 2008 - (Senate Bill#12, fall 2006 & Senate Bill#84, spring 2006) + Matt Schock - UC Davis class of 2006 - (Senate Bill#12, fall 2006 & Senate Bill#84, spring 2006) + ["Users/MatthewShannon" Matthew Shannon] - UC Davis class of 2008 - (Senate Bill#84, spring 2006) + ["Users/JillWeinstein" Jill Weinstein] - UC Davis class of 2007 - (Senate Bill#12, fall 2006 & Senate Bill#84, spring 2006) + ["Users/MaxMikalonis" Max Mikalonis] - UC Davis class of 2009 - (Senate Bill#12, fall 2006) + Alix Giroux - UC Davis class of 2009 - (Senate Bill#12, fall 2006) + ["Users/PaulHarms" Paul Harms] - UC Davis class of 2009 - (Senate Bill#84, spring 2006) + + '''Internal Affairs Commissioners ABSTAINING to vote on whether to have a voluntary recitation of the Pledge of Allegiance at Senate meetings:''' + '''["Jack Shannon"]''' - UC Davis class of 2008 - (Senate Bill#84, spring 2006) + ["Eric Wu"] - UC Davis class of 2006 - (Senate Bill#84, spring 2006)

Infernal Affairs Commission

MaxMikalonis — 2009-07-17 15:20:15

Revert to version 29.

Differences for Infernal Affairs Commission

Deletions are marked with - .	Additions are marked with +.
Line 1:	Line 1:
- '' '''Note:''' "Infernal Affairs Commission is simply a reference to the ["Internal Affairs Commission" IAC], when said Commission members vote in a manner that others find galling. The name is obviously a humorous play on "Internal Affairs Commission.''	+ '' '''Note:''' This is not an actual commission of UCD student government, but a satirically named page with content certain people were opposed to having on the ["Internal Affairs Commission" IAC] page, and is part of a compromise. The name is obviously a humorous play on the name.''
Line 3:	Line 3:
- People applying to ["Internal Affairs Commission" IAC]: be advised that members of the student body may take issue with your voting decisions.	+ People applying to ["Internal Affairs Commission" IAC] be advised that you might receive somewhat threatening/insulting/patronizing reactions in the course of your job. In most cases, however, the responses are from people who do not fully understand the role of the commission and are almost comical. Here is a recent example that was sent out to not only the commission but most of ASUCD Government as well:
Line 5:	Line 5:
- - {{{
Line 62:	Line 60:
- Cameron Menezes - UC Davis class of 2005 - }}} - - +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ - - Please see "ASUCD Senate Bill #84, ASUCD Information Systems webpage (http://asucd.ucdavis.edu/government/gov-documents/senate-bills/2005-2006) - Please see "ASUCD Senate Bill #12, ASUCD Information Systems webpage (http://asucd.ucdavis.edu/government/gov-documents/senate-bills/2006-2007) - - '''Internal Affairs Commissioners voting to have a voluntary recitation of the Pledge of Allegiance at Senate meetings:''' - ["Joseph Bleckman"] - UC Davis class of 2009 - (Senate Bill#12, fall 2006) - Tom Woelfel - UC Davis class of 2006 - (Senate Bill#84, spring 2006) - - '''Internal Affairs Commissioners voting NOT to have a voluntary recitation of the Pledge of Allegiance at Senate meetings:''' - ["Derick Lennox"] - UC Davis class of 2009 - (Senate Bill#12, fall 2006 & Senate Bill#84, spring 2006) - Mike Rivera - UC Davis class of 2008 - (Senate Bill#12, fall 2006 & Senate Bill#84, spring 2006) - Matt Schock - UC Davis class of 2006 - (Senate Bill#12, fall 2006 & Senate Bill#84, spring 2006) - ["Users/MatthewShannon" Matthew Shannon] - UC Davis class of 2008 - (Senate Bill#84, spring 2006) - ["Users/JillWeinstein" Jill Weinstein] - UC Davis class of 2007 - (Senate Bill#12, fall 2006 & Senate Bill#84, spring 2006) - ["Users/MaxMikalonis" Max Mikalonis] - UC Davis class of 2009 - (Senate Bill#12, fall 2006) - Alix Giroux - UC Davis class of 2009 - (Senate Bill#12, fall 2006) - ["Users/PaulHarms" Paul Harms] - UC Davis class of 2009 - (Senate Bill#84, spring 2006) - - '''Internal Affairs Commissioners ABSTAINING to vote on whether to have a voluntary recitation of the Pledge of Allegiance at Senate meetings:''' - '''["Jack Shannon"]''' - UC Davis class of 2008 - (Senate Bill#84, spring 2006) - ["Eric Wu"] - UC Davis class of 2006 - (Senate Bill#84, spring 2006)	+ Steven Ostrowski

Infernal Affairs Commission

CameronMenezes — 2009-07-14 22:44:35

Differences for Infernal Affairs Commission

Deletions are marked with - .	Additions are marked with +.
Line 3:	Line 3:
- People applying to ["Internal Affairs Commission" IAC]: be advised that members of the student body may take issue with your voting decisions Here is an example of a displeased student who expressed his sentiments to the Internal Affairs commission. - - His letter is regarding the ["Internal Affairs Commission" Internal Affairs Commission's] decision not to approve a particular bill that would have amended the ASUCD bylaws to include the voluntary recitation of the Pledge of Allegiance at the beginning of all ASUCD Senate meetings. Voluntary in that nobody would have been compelled to say the Pledge; in fact, the wording of the bill was such that nobody would have been compelled to even stand for the Pledge.	+ People applying to ["Internal Affairs Commission" IAC]: be advised that members of the student body may take issue with your voting decisions.

Infernal Affairs Commission

CameronMenezes — 2009-07-14 22:43:26

Revert to version 28.

Differences for Infernal Affairs Commission

Deletions are marked with - .	Additions are marked with +.
Line 1:	Line 1:
- '' '''Note:''' This is not an actual commission of UCD student government, but a satirically named page with content certain people were opposed to having on the ["Internal Affairs Commission" IAC] page, and is part of a compromise. The name is obviously a humorous play on the name.''	+ '' '''Note:''' "Infernal Affairs Commission is simply a reference to the ["Internal Affairs Commission" IAC], when said Commission members vote in a manner that others find galling. The name is obviously a humorous play on "Internal Affairs Commission.''
Line 3:	Line 3:
- People applying to ["Internal Affairs Commission" IAC] be advised that you might receive somewhat threatening/insulting/patronizing reactions in the course of your job. In most cases, however, the responses are from people who do not fully understand the role of the commission and are almost comical. Here is a recent example that was sent out to not only the commission but most of ASUCD Government as well:	+ People applying to ["Internal Affairs Commission" IAC]: be advised that members of the student body may take issue with your voting decisions Here is an example of a displeased student who expressed his sentiments to the Internal Affairs commission.
Line 5:	Line 5:
	+ His letter is regarding the ["Internal Affairs Commission" Internal Affairs Commission's] decision not to approve a particular bill that would have amended the ASUCD bylaws to include the voluntary recitation of the Pledge of Allegiance at the beginning of all ASUCD Senate meetings. Voluntary in that nobody would have been compelled to say the Pledge; in fact, the wording of the bill was such that nobody would have been compelled to even stand for the Pledge. + + + {{{
Line 60:	Line 64:
- Steven Ostrowski	+ Cameron Menezes - UC Davis class of 2005 + }}} + + +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ + + Please see "ASUCD Senate Bill #84, ASUCD Information Systems webpage (http://asucd.ucdavis.edu/government/gov-documents/senate-bills/2005-2006) + Please see "ASUCD Senate Bill #12, ASUCD Information Systems webpage (http://asucd.ucdavis.edu/government/gov-documents/senate-bills/2006-2007) + + '''Internal Affairs Commissioners voting to have a voluntary recitation of the Pledge of Allegiance at Senate meetings:''' + ["Joseph Bleckman"] - UC Davis class of 2009 - (Senate Bill#12, fall 2006) + Tom Woelfel - UC Davis class of 2006 - (Senate Bill#84, spring 2006) + + '''Internal Affairs Commissioners voting NOT to have a voluntary recitation of the Pledge of Allegiance at Senate meetings:''' + ["Derick Lennox"] - UC Davis class of 2009 - (Senate Bill#12, fall 2006 & Senate Bill#84, spring 2006) + Mike Rivera - UC Davis class of 2008 - (Senate Bill#12, fall 2006 & Senate Bill#84, spring 2006) + Matt Schock - UC Davis class of 2006 - (Senate Bill#12, fall 2006 & Senate Bill#84, spring 2006) + ["Users/MatthewShannon" Matthew Shannon] - UC Davis class of 2008 - (Senate Bill#84, spring 2006) + ["Users/JillWeinstein" Jill Weinstein] - UC Davis class of 2007 - (Senate Bill#12, fall 2006 & Senate Bill#84, spring 2006) + ["Users/MaxMikalonis" Max Mikalonis] - UC Davis class of 2009 - (Senate Bill#12, fall 2006) + Alix Giroux - UC Davis class of 2009 - (Senate Bill#12, fall 2006) + ["Users/PaulHarms" Paul Harms] - UC Davis class of 2009 - (Senate Bill#84, spring 2006) + + '''Internal Affairs Commissioners ABSTAINING to vote on whether to have a voluntary recitation of the Pledge of Allegiance at Senate meetings:''' + '''["Jack Shannon"]''' - UC Davis class of 2008 - (Senate Bill#84, spring 2006) + ["Eric Wu"] - UC Davis class of 2006 - (Senate Bill#84, spring 2006)

Infernal Affairs Commission

BrentLaabs — 2009-07-14 22:24:03

Revert to version 6.

Differences for Infernal Affairs Commission

Deletions are marked with - .	Additions are marked with +.
Line 1:	Line 1:
- '' '''Note:''' "Infernal Affairs Commission is simply a reference to the ["Internal Affairs Commission" IAC], when said Commission members vote in a manner that others find galling. The name is obviously a humorous play on "Internal Affairs Commission.''	+ '' '''Note:''' This is not an actual commission of UCD student government, but a satirically named page with content certain people were opposed to having on the ["Internal Affairs Commission" IAC] page, and is part of a compromise. The name is obviously a humorous play on the name.''
Line 3:	Line 3:
- People applying to ["Internal Affairs Commission" IAC]: be advised that members of the student body may take issue with your voting decisions Here is an example of a displeased student who expressed his sentiments to the Internal Affairs commission.	+ People applying to ["Internal Affairs Commission" IAC] be advised that you might receive somewhat threatening/insulting/patronizing reactions in the course of your job. In most cases, however, the responses are from people who do not fully understand the role of the commission and are almost comical. Here is a recent example that was sent out to not only the commission but most of ASUCD Government as well:
Line 5:	Line 5:
- His letter is regarding the ["Internal Affairs Commission" Internal Affairs Commission's] decision not to approve a particular bill that would have amended the ASUCD bylaws to include the voluntary recitation of the Pledge of Allegiance at the beginning of all ASUCD Senate meetings. Voluntary in that nobody would have been compelled to say the Pledge; in fact, the wording of the bill was such that nobody would have been compelled to even stand for the Pledge. - - - {{{
Line 64:	Line 60:
- Cameron Menezes - UC Davis class of 2005 - }}} - - +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ - - Please see "ASUCD Senate Bill #84, ASUCD Information Systems webpage (http://asucd.ucdavis.edu/government/gov-documents/senate-bills/2005-2006) - Please see "ASUCD Senate Bill #12, ASUCD Information Systems webpage (http://asucd.ucdavis.edu/government/gov-documents/senate-bills/2006-2007) - - '''Internal Affairs Commissioners voting to have a voluntary recitation of the Pledge of Allegiance at Senate meetings:''' - ["Joseph Bleckman"] - UC Davis class of 2009 - (Senate Bill#12, fall 2006) - Tom Woelfel - UC Davis class of 2006 - (Senate Bill#84, spring 2006) - - '''Internal Affairs Commissioners voting NOT to have a voluntary recitation of the Pledge of Allegiance at Senate meetings:''' - ["Derick Lennox"] - UC Davis class of 2009 - (Senate Bill#12, fall 2006 & Senate Bill#84, spring 2006) - Mike Rivera - UC Davis class of 2008 - (Senate Bill#12, fall 2006 & Senate Bill#84, spring 2006) - Matt Schock - UC Davis class of 2006 - (Senate Bill#12, fall 2006 & Senate Bill#84, spring 2006) - ["Users/MatthewShannon" Matthew Shannon] - UC Davis class of 2008 - (Senate Bill#84, spring 2006) - ["Users/JillWeinstein" Jill Weinstein] - UC Davis class of 2007 - (Senate Bill#12, fall 2006 & Senate Bill#84, spring 2006) - ["Users/MaxMikalonis" Max Mikalonis] - UC Davis class of 2009 - (Senate Bill#12, fall 2006) - Alix Giroux - UC Davis class of 2009 - (Senate Bill#12, fall 2006) - ["Users/PaulHarms" Paul Harms] - UC Davis class of 2009 - (Senate Bill#84, spring 2006) - - '''Internal Affairs Commissioners ABSTAINING to vote on whether to have a voluntary recitation of the Pledge of Allegiance at Senate meetings:''' - '''["Jack Shannon"]''' - UC Davis class of 2008 - (Senate Bill#84, spring 2006) - ["Eric Wu"] - UC Davis class of 2006 - (Senate Bill#84, spring 2006)	+ Steven Ostrowski

Infernal Affairs Commission

CameronMenezes — 2009-07-14 22:09:34

Differences for Infernal Affairs Commission

Deletions are marked with - .	Additions are marked with +.
Line 3:	Line 3:
- People applying to ["Internal Affairs Commission" IAC]: be advised that members of the student body may take issue with your voting decisions Here is an example of a displeased student who expressed his sentiments to the Internal Affairs commission for their decision not to approve a bill that would begin all ASUCD Senate meetings with a voluntary recitation of the Pledge of Allegiance. Voluntary in that nobody would have been compelled to say the Pledge; in fact, the wording of the bill was such that nobody would have been compelled to even stand for the Pledge.	+ People applying to ["Internal Affairs Commission" IAC]: be advised that members of the student body may take issue with your voting decisions Here is an example of a displeased student who expressed his sentiments to the Internal Affairs commission. + + His letter is regarding the ["Internal Affairs Commission" Internal Affairs Commission's] decision not to approve a particular bill that would have amended the ASUCD bylaws to include the voluntary recitation of the Pledge of Allegiance at the beginning of all ASUCD Senate meetings. Voluntary in that nobody would have been compelled to say the Pledge; in fact, the wording of the bill was such that nobody would have been compelled to even stand for the Pledge.
Line 70:	Line 72:
- '''Internal Affairs Commissioners voting TO have a voluntary recitation of the Pledge of Allegiance at Senate meetings:''' - Joseph Bleckman - UC Davis class of 2009 - (Senate Bill#12, fall 2006)	+ '''Internal Affairs Commissioners voting to have a voluntary recitation of the Pledge of Allegiance at Senate meetings:''' + ["Joseph Bleckman"] - UC Davis class of 2009 - (Senate Bill#12, fall 2006)
Line 75:	Line 77:
- Derick Lennox - UC Davis class of 2009 - (Senate Bill#12, fall 2006 & Senate Bill#84, spring 2006)	+ ["Derick Lennox"] - UC Davis class of 2009 - (Senate Bill#12, fall 2006 & Senate Bill#84, spring 2006)
Line 78:	Line 80:
- Matthew Shannon - UC Davis class of 2008 - (Senate Bill#84, spring 2006) - Jill Weinstein - UC Davis class of 2007 - (Senate Bill#12, fall 2006 & Senate Bill#84, spring 2006) - Max Mikalonis - UC Davis class of 2009 - (Senate Bill#12, fall 2006)	+ ["Users/MatthewShannon" Matthew Shannon] - UC Davis class of 2008 - (Senate Bill#84, spring 2006) + ["Users/JillWeinstein" Jill Weinstein] - UC Davis class of 2007 - (Senate Bill#12, fall 2006 & Senate Bill#84, spring 2006) + ["Users/MaxMikalonis" Max Mikalonis] - UC Davis class of 2009 - (Senate Bill#12, fall 2006)
Line 82:	Line 84:
- Paul Harms - UC Davis class of 2009 - (Senate Bill#84, spring 2006)	+ ["Users/PaulHarms" Paul Harms] - UC Davis class of 2009 - (Senate Bill#84, spring 2006)
Line 85:	Line 87:
- Jack Shannon - UC Davis class of 2008 - (Senate Bill#84, spring 2006) - Eric Wu - UC Davis class of 2006 - (Senate Bill#84, spring 2006)	+ '''["Jack Shannon"]''' - UC Davis class of 2008 - (Senate Bill#84, spring 2006) + ["Eric Wu"] - UC Davis class of 2006 - (Senate Bill#84, spring 2006)

Infernal Affairs Commission

JabberWokky — 2009-07-14 07:37:13

Differences for Infernal Affairs Commission

Deletions are marked with - .	Additions are marked with +.
Line 1:	Line 1:
- '' '''Note:''' "Infernal Affairs Commission is simply a reference to the ["Internal Affairs Commission" IAC], when said Commission members vote in a manner that others find galling. The name is obviously a humorous play on "Internal Affairs Commission.	+ '' '''Note:''' "Infernal Affairs Commission is simply a reference to the ["Internal Affairs Commission" IAC], when said Commission members vote in a manner that others find galling. The name is obviously a humorous play on "Internal Affairs Commission.''
Line 5:	Line 5:
	+ + {{{
Line 61:	Line 63:
	+ }}}

Infernal Affairs Commission

CameronMenezes — 2009-07-14 06:45:28

Differences for Infernal Affairs Commission

Deletions are marked with - .	Additions are marked with +.
Line 1:	Line 1:
- '' '''Note:''' This is not an actual commission of UCD student government, but a satirically named page with content certain people were opposed to having on the ["Internal Affairs Commission" IAC] page, and is part of a compromise. The name is obviously a humorous play on the name.''	+ '' '''Note:''' "Infernal Affairs Commission is simply a reference to the ["Internal Affairs Commission" IAC], when said Commission members vote in a manner that others find galling. The name is obviously a humorous play on "Internal Affairs Commission.
Line 3:	Line 3:
- People applying to ["Internal Affairs Commission" IAC] be advised that you might receive somewhat threatening/insulting/patronizing reactions in the course of your job. In most cases, however, the responses are from people who do not fully understand the role of the commission and are almost comical. Here is a --XrecentX-- not-so-recent example that was sent out to not only the commission but most of ASUCD Government as well:	+ People applying to ["Internal Affairs Commission" IAC]: be advised that members of the student body may take issue with your voting decisions Here is an example of a displeased student who expressed his sentiments to the Internal Affairs commission for their decision not to approve a bill that would begin all ASUCD Senate meetings with a voluntary recitation of the Pledge of Allegiance. Voluntary in that nobody would have been compelled to say the Pledge; in fact, the wording of the bill was such that nobody would have been compelled to even stand for the Pledge.

Infernal Affairs Commission

CameronMenezes — 2009-07-13 23:58:18

Differences for Infernal Affairs Commission

Deletions are marked with - .	Additions are marked with +.
Line 63:	Line 63:
- Please see "Senate Bill #12, ASUCD Information Systems webpage (http://asucd.ucdavis.edu/government/gov-documents/senate-bills/2006-2007)
Line 65:	Line 64:
- '''Internal Affairs Commissioners voting to have a voluntary recitation of the Pledge of Allegiance at Senate meetings:''' - Joseph Bleckman - class of 2009	+ Please see "ASUCD Senate Bill #84, ASUCD Information Systems webpage (http://asucd.ucdavis.edu/government/gov-documents/senate-bills/2005-2006) + Please see "ASUCD Senate Bill #12, ASUCD Information Systems webpage (http://asucd.ucdavis.edu/government/gov-documents/senate-bills/2006-2007) + + '''Internal Affairs Commissioners voting TO have a voluntary recitation of the Pledge of Allegiance at Senate meetings:''' + Joseph Bleckman - UC Davis class of 2009 - (Senate Bill#12, fall 2006) + Tom Woelfel - UC Davis class of 2006 - (Senate Bill#84, spring 2006)
Line 69:	Line 72:
- Derick Lennox - UC Davis class of 2009 - Mike Rivera - UC Davis class of 2008 - Matt Schock - UC Davis class of 2006 - Jack Shannon - UC Davis class of 2008 - Jill Weinstein - UC Davis class of 2007 - Maximillian Mikalonis - UC Davis class of 2009 - Alix Giroux - UC Davis class of 2009	+ Derick Lennox - UC Davis class of 2009 - (Senate Bill#12, fall 2006 & Senate Bill#84, spring 2006) + Mike Rivera - UC Davis class of 2008 - (Senate Bill#12, fall 2006 & Senate Bill#84, spring 2006) + Matt Schock - UC Davis class of 2006 - (Senate Bill#12, fall 2006 & Senate Bill#84, spring 2006) + Matthew Shannon - UC Davis class of 2008 - (Senate Bill#84, spring 2006) + Jill Weinstein - UC Davis class of 2007 - (Senate Bill#12, fall 2006 & Senate Bill#84, spring 2006) + Max Mikalonis - UC Davis class of 2009 - (Senate Bill#12, fall 2006) + Alix Giroux - UC Davis class of 2009 - (Senate Bill#12, fall 2006) + Paul Harms - UC Davis class of 2009 - (Senate Bill#84, spring 2006) + + '''Internal Affairs Commissioners ABSTAINING to vote on whether to have a voluntary recitation of the Pledge of Allegiance at Senate meetings:''' + Jack Shannon - UC Davis class of 2008 - (Senate Bill#84, spring 2006) + Eric Wu - UC Davis class of 2006 - (Senate Bill#84, spring 2006)

Infernal Affairs Commission

CameronMenezes — 2009-07-13 23:15:14

Differences for Infernal Affairs Commission

Deletions are marked with - .	Additions are marked with +.
Line 73:	Line 73:
- Jill Weinstein - UC Davis class unknown	+ Jill Weinstein - UC Davis class of 2007

Infernal Affairs Commission

CameronMenezes — 2009-07-13 23:10:15

Differences for Infernal Affairs Commission

Deletions are marked with - .	Additions are marked with +.
Line 60:	Line 60:
- Cameron Menezes	+ Cameron Menezes - UC Davis class of 2005 + + +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ + Please see "Senate Bill #12, ASUCD Information Systems webpage (http://asucd.ucdavis.edu/government/gov-documents/senate-bills/2006-2007) + + '''Internal Affairs Commissioners voting to have a voluntary recitation of the Pledge of Allegiance at Senate meetings:''' + Joseph Bleckman - class of 2009 + + '''Internal Affairs Commissioners voting NOT to have a voluntary recitation of the Pledge of Allegiance at Senate meetings:''' + Derick Lennox - UC Davis class of 2009 + Mike Rivera - UC Davis class of 2008 + Matt Schock - UC Davis class of 2006 + Jack Shannon - UC Davis class of 2008 + Jill Weinstein - UC Davis class unknown + Maximillian Mikalonis - UC Davis class of 2009 + Alix Giroux - UC Davis class of 2009

Infernal Affairs Commission

WilliamLewis — 2009-03-01 12:33:22

Revert to version 20 (A quote is a quote.).

Differences for Infernal Affairs Commission

Deletions are marked with - .	Additions are marked with +.
Line 48:	Line 48:
- embarrassing affair on record, you'll need it.	+ embarassing affair on record, you'll need it.

Infernal Affairs Commission

JoePomidor — 2009-03-01 12:15:41

Differences for Infernal Affairs Commission

Deletions are marked with - .	Additions are marked with +.
Line 48:	Line 48:
- embarassing affair on record, you'll need it.	+ embarrassing affair on record, you'll need it.

Infernal Affairs Commission

WilliamLewis — 2009-03-01 09:13:01

Differences for Infernal Affairs Commission

Deletions are marked with - .	Additions are marked with +.
Line 3:	Line 3:
- People applying to ["Internal Affairs Commission" IAC] be advised that you might receive somewhat threatening/insulting/patronizing reactions in the course of your job. In most cases, however, the responses are from people who do not fully understand the role of the commission and are almost comical. Here is a recent not-so-recent example that was sent out to not only the commission but most of ASUCD Government as well:	+ People applying to ["Internal Affairs Commission" IAC] be advised that you might receive somewhat threatening/insulting/patronizing reactions in the course of your job. In most cases, however, the responses are from people who do not fully understand the role of the commission and are almost comical. Here is a --XrecentX-- not-so-recent example that was sent out to not only the commission but most of ASUCD Government as well:

Infernal Affairs Commission

WilliamLewis — 2009-02-28 23:01:03

(quick edit)

Differences for Infernal Affairs Commission

Deletions are marked with - .	Additions are marked with +.
Line 3:	Line 3:
- People applying to ["Internal Affairs Commission" IAC] be advised that you might receive somewhat threatening/insulting/patronizing reactions in the course of your job. In most cases, however, the responses are from people who do not fully understand the role of the commission and are almost comical. Here is a recent example that was sent out to not only the commission but most of ASUCD Government as well:	+ People applying to ["Internal Affairs Commission" IAC] be advised that you might receive somewhat threatening/insulting/patronizing reactions in the course of your job. In most cases, however, the responses are from people who do not fully understand the role of the commission and are almost comical. Here is a recent not-so-recent example that was sent out to not only the commission but most of ASUCD Government as well:

Infernal Affairs Commission

BrentLaabs — 2009-02-28 22:58:39

Revert to version 12.

Differences for Infernal Affairs Commission

Deletions are marked with - .	Additions are marked with +.
Line 3:	Line 3:
- People applying to ["Internal Affairs Commission" IAC] be advised that you might receive negative feedback from the public during the course of your duties. Here is an example that was sent out to not only the commission but most of ASUCD Government as well:	+ People applying to ["Internal Affairs Commission" IAC] be advised that you might receive somewhat threatening/insulting/patronizing reactions in the course of your job. In most cases, however, the responses are from people who do not fully understand the role of the commission and are almost comical. Here is a recent example that was sent out to not only the commission but most of ASUCD Government as well:
Line 48:	Line 48:
- embarrassing affair on record, you'll need it.	+ embarassing affair on record, you'll need it.
Line 60:	Line 60:
- [Name Withheld (see talk in previous edits)]	+ Cameron Menezes

Infernal Affairs Commission

JoePomidor — 2009-01-20 21:51:54

Differences for Infernal Affairs Commission

Deletions are marked with - .	Additions are marked with +.
Line 48:	Line 48:
- embarassing affair on record, you'll need it.	+ embarrassing affair on record, you'll need it.

Infernal Affairs Commission

CameronMenezes — 2007-12-04 20:18:48

All pejorative descriptions, none of these are neutral.

Differences for Infernal Affairs Commission

Deletions are marked with - .	Additions are marked with +.
Line 3:	Line 3:
- People applying to ["Internal Affairs Commission" IAC] be advised that you might receive somewhat threatening/insulting/patronizing reactions in the course of your job. Here is an example that was sent out to not only the commission but most of ASUCD Government as well:	+ People applying to ["Internal Affairs Commission" IAC] be advised that you might receive negative feedback from the public during the course of your duties. Here is an example that was sent out to not only the commission but most of ASUCD Government as well:

Infernal Affairs Commission

SteveOstrowski — 2007-09-09 02:40:45

source it

Differences for Infernal Affairs Commission

Deletions are marked with - .	Additions are marked with +.
Line 3:	Line 3:
- People applying to ["Internal Affairs Commission" IAC] be advised that you might receive somewhat threatening/insulting/patronizing reactions in the course of your job. In most cases, however, the responses are from people who do not fully understand the role of the commission and are almost comical. Here is a recent example that was sent out to not only the commission but most of ASUCD Government as well:	+ People applying to ["Internal Affairs Commission" IAC] be advised that you might receive somewhat threatening/insulting/patronizing reactions in the course of your job. Here is an example that was sent out to not only the commission but most of ASUCD Government as well:

Infernal Affairs Commission

KrisFricke — 2007-02-07 20:14:26

Made it more clear that the prophecy was not made anonymously originally

Differences for Infernal Affairs Commission

Deletions are marked with - .	Additions are marked with +.
Line 60:	Line 60:
- XXX.	+ [Name Withheld (see talk in previous edits)]

Infernal Affairs Commission

EdwinSaada — 2007-02-07 16:03:41

no point in naming author, removed, if this letter is just an 'example'

Differences for Infernal Affairs Commission

Deletions are marked with - .	Additions are marked with +.
Line 60:	Line 60:
- Cameron Menezes	+ XXX.

Infernal Affairs Commission

EdwinSaada — 2007-02-07 16:01:59

Revert to version 10 (disagree with name change, and disagree with naming everything a controversy. ).

Differences for Infernal Affairs Commission

Deletions are marked with - .	Additions are marked with +.
Line 1:	Line 1:
- #redirect Infernal Affairs Commission Controversy	+ '' '''Note:''' This is not an actual commission of UCD student government, but a satirically named page with content certain people were opposed to having on the ["Internal Affairs Commission" IAC] page, and is part of a compromise. The name is obviously a humorous play on the name.'' + + People applying to ["Internal Affairs Commission" IAC] be advised that you might receive somewhat threatening/insulting/patronizing reactions in the course of your job. In most cases, however, the responses are from people who do not fully understand the role of the commission and are almost comical. Here is a recent example that was sent out to not only the commission but most of ASUCD Government as well: + + Dear Internal Affairs Commissioners, + + I was shocked to learn that you voted down the Pledge of Allegiance bill. I + read the bill, it is well-written and perfectly fair. I cannot understand + how all of you, in your right minds, could vote against a bill to say the + Pledge of Allegiance to the U.S. flag. + + Your "no" vote just doesn't make any sense. Especially when considering + that UC Davis, as a public research university, relies on funding from the + STATE and FEDERAL levels of government. + Your decision rings with ingratitude for the deluge of money that the + state and federal governments rain down on this school. + + Every time the ASUCD Senate has their meeting, many different opinions + bounce around the room. Isn't it wonderful that the U.S. Constitution + allows for that freedom of speech, without any fear of retribution from the + government? Voting "no" on this bill is a disservice to the principles that + even allow ASUCD to exist. + + Any and every reputable political body in the entire nation says the Pledge + of Allegiance before their meetings begin. You are all incredibly immature + for voting down this bill, especially since reciting the Pledge, or even + standing up to recognize the flag, would be optional. + + And for those of you who are worried about self-preservation... + Congratulations on having this in your permanent political record. I hope + you realize that your chance for ever getting elected to any public office + is ruined, for the rest of your lives. + + No discerning citizen would vote for a man/woman to represent them, if that + man/woman is on RECORD saying that the Pledge of Allegiance is not good + enough to be said, aloud, in a public university. Especially since the + recitation of the Pledge, in this and in every situation, is optional. + + I'm not trying to be mean-spirited about this particular point, but let's + face it. If you ever run for any public office, your chances of victory are + very slim if the media somehow discovers your "no" vote. + + You have also slimmed your chances of getting hired by any + non-governmental organization or business that would take issue with your + vote. All companies do background checks, as I'm sure you are well aware. + + So I wish you the best of luck in your future ventures, because with this + embarassing affair on record, you'll need it. + + Shame on you, those who voted "no." You're not even elected officials. Let + the Senators, elected by popular vote, do the legislating in ASUCD, + especially when it comes to bills of such incredible importance as this one. + + When it comes down to principles, we as people don't bleed blue and gold, or + red and yellow. Like it or not, we are granted many freedoms by the U.S. + Constitution, and saying the Pledge before a public meeting is simply a way + of recognizing those freedoms. That's all. + + Sincerely, + Cameron Menezes

Infernal Affairs Commission

SteveOstrowski — 2007-02-07 15:10:35

Renamed to "Infernal Affairs Commission Controversy"

Differences for Infernal Affairs Commission

Deletions are marked with - .	Additions are marked with +.
Line 1:	Line 1:
- '' '''Note:''' This is not an actual commission of UCD student government, but a satirically named page with content certain people were opposed to having on the ["Internal Affairs Commission" IAC] page, and is part of a compromise. The name is obviously a humorous play on the name.'' - - People applying to ["Internal Affairs Commission" IAC] be advised that you might receive somewhat threatening/insulting/patronizing reactions in the course of your job. In most cases, however, the responses are from people who do not fully understand the role of the commission and are almost comical. Here is a recent example that was sent out to not only the commission but most of ASUCD Government as well: - - Dear Internal Affairs Commissioners, - - I was shocked to learn that you voted down the Pledge of Allegiance bill. I - read the bill, it is well-written and perfectly fair. I cannot understand - how all of you, in your right minds, could vote against a bill to say the - Pledge of Allegiance to the U.S. flag. - - Your "no" vote just doesn't make any sense. Especially when considering - that UC Davis, as a public research university, relies on funding from the - STATE and FEDERAL levels of government. - Your decision rings with ingratitude for the deluge of money that the - state and federal governments rain down on this school. - - Every time the ASUCD Senate has their meeting, many different opinions - bounce around the room. Isn't it wonderful that the U.S. Constitution - allows for that freedom of speech, without any fear of retribution from the - government? Voting "no" on this bill is a disservice to the principles that - even allow ASUCD to exist. - - Any and every reputable political body in the entire nation says the Pledge - of Allegiance before their meetings begin. You are all incredibly immature - for voting down this bill, especially since reciting the Pledge, or even - standing up to recognize the flag, would be optional. - - And for those of you who are worried about self-preservation... - Congratulations on having this in your permanent political record. I hope - you realize that your chance for ever getting elected to any public office - is ruined, for the rest of your lives. - - No discerning citizen would vote for a man/woman to represent them, if that - man/woman is on RECORD saying that the Pledge of Allegiance is not good - enough to be said, aloud, in a public university. Especially since the - recitation of the Pledge, in this and in every situation, is optional. - - I'm not trying to be mean-spirited about this particular point, but let's - face it. If you ever run for any public office, your chances of victory are - very slim if the media somehow discovers your "no" vote. - - You have also slimmed your chances of getting hired by any - non-governmental organization or business that would take issue with your - vote. All companies do background checks, as I'm sure you are well aware. - - So I wish you the best of luck in your future ventures, because with this - embarassing affair on record, you'll need it. - - Shame on you, those who voted "no." You're not even elected officials. Let - the Senators, elected by popular vote, do the legislating in ASUCD, - especially when it comes to bills of such incredible importance as this one. - - When it comes down to principles, we as people don't bleed blue and gold, or - red and yellow. Like it or not, we are granted many freedoms by the U.S. - Constitution, and saying the Pledge before a public meeting is simply a way - of recognizing those freedoms. That's all. - - Sincerely, - Cameron Menezes	+ #redirect Infernal Affairs Commission Controversy

Infernal Affairs Commission

DavidPoole — 2007-02-07 14:41:54

Revert to version 7 (you deleted the name).

Differences for Infernal Affairs Commission

Deletions are marked with - .	Additions are marked with +.
Line 60:	Line 60:
- - [Author's name removed for privacy]	+ Cameron Menezes

Infernal Affairs Commission

EdwinSaada — 2007-02-07 14:35:44

didn't see brents edit, was reverting DP

Differences for Infernal Affairs Commission

Deletions are marked with - .	Additions are marked with +.
Line 60:	Line 60:
	+

Infernal Affairs Commission

EdwinSaada — 2007-02-07 14:34:52

Revert to version 5 (nope. ).

Differences for Infernal Affairs Commission

Deletions are marked with - .	Additions are marked with +.
Line 60:	Line 60:
- Cameron Menezes	+ [Author's name removed for privacy]

Infernal Affairs Commission

BrentLaabs — 2007-02-07 14:34:42

wrong person

Differences for Infernal Affairs Commission

Deletions are marked with - .	Additions are marked with +.
Line 60:	Line 60:
- Steven Ostrowski	+ Cameron Menezes

Infernal Affairs Commission

DavidPoole — 2007-02-07 14:32:45

in the interest of full disclosure

Differences for Infernal Affairs Commission

Deletions are marked with - .	Additions are marked with +.
Line 60:	Line 60:
- [Author's name removed for privacy]	+ Steven Ostrowski

Infernal Affairs Commission

EdwinSaada — 2006-11-25 22:00:30

added note about page.

Differences for Infernal Affairs Commission

Deletions are marked with - .	Additions are marked with +.
Line 1:	Line 1:
- ''People applying to ["Internal Affairs Commission" IAC] be advised that you might receive somewhat threatening/insulting/patronizing reactions in the course of your job. In most cases, however, the responses are from people who do not fully understand the role of the commission and are almost comical. Here is a recent example that was sent out to not only the commission but most of ASUCD Government as well:''	+ '' '''Note:''' This is not an actual commission of UCD student government, but a satirically named page with content certain people were opposed to having on the ["Internal Affairs Commission" IAC] page, and is part of a compromise. The name is obviously a humorous play on the name.'' + + People applying to ["Internal Affairs Commission" IAC] be advised that you might receive somewhat threatening/insulting/patronizing reactions in the course of your job. In most cases, however, the responses are from people who do not fully understand the role of the commission and are almost comical. Here is a recent example that was sent out to not only the commission but most of ASUCD Government as well:

Infernal Affairs Commission

EdwinSaada — 2006-11-25 21:55:51

Revert to version 2 (this was the compromise from having it on the page. add info to text.).

Differences for Infernal Affairs Commission

Deletions are marked with - .	Additions are marked with +.
Line 1:	Line 1:
- deleted	+ ''People applying to ["Internal Affairs Commission" IAC] be advised that you might receive somewhat threatening/insulting/patronizing reactions in the course of your job. In most cases, however, the responses are from people who do not fully understand the role of the commission and are almost comical. Here is a recent example that was sent out to not only the commission but most of ASUCD Government as well:'' + + Dear Internal Affairs Commissioners, + + I was shocked to learn that you voted down the Pledge of Allegiance bill. I + read the bill, it is well-written and perfectly fair. I cannot understand + how all of you, in your right minds, could vote against a bill to say the + Pledge of Allegiance to the U.S. flag. + + Your "no" vote just doesn't make any sense. Especially when considering + that UC Davis, as a public research university, relies on funding from the + STATE and FEDERAL levels of government. + Your decision rings with ingratitude for the deluge of money that the + state and federal governments rain down on this school. + + Every time the ASUCD Senate has their meeting, many different opinions + bounce around the room. Isn't it wonderful that the U.S. Constitution + allows for that freedom of speech, without any fear of retribution from the + government? Voting "no" on this bill is a disservice to the principles that + even allow ASUCD to exist. + + Any and every reputable political body in the entire nation says the Pledge + of Allegiance before their meetings begin. You are all incredibly immature + for voting down this bill, especially since reciting the Pledge, or even + standing up to recognize the flag, would be optional. + + And for those of you who are worried about self-preservation... + Congratulations on having this in your permanent political record. I hope + you realize that your chance for ever getting elected to any public office + is ruined, for the rest of your lives. + + No discerning citizen would vote for a man/woman to represent them, if that + man/woman is on RECORD saying that the Pledge of Allegiance is not good + enough to be said, aloud, in a public university. Especially since the + recitation of the Pledge, in this and in every situation, is optional. + + I'm not trying to be mean-spirited about this particular point, but let's + face it. If you ever run for any public office, your chances of victory are + very slim if the media somehow discovers your "no" vote. + + You have also slimmed your chances of getting hired by any + non-governmental organization or business that would take issue with your + vote. All companies do background checks, as I'm sure you are well aware. + + So I wish you the best of luck in your future ventures, because with this + embarassing affair on record, you'll need it. + + Shame on you, those who voted "no." You're not even elected officials. Let + the Senators, elected by popular vote, do the legislating in ASUCD, + especially when it comes to bills of such incredible importance as this one. + + When it comes down to principles, we as people don't bleed blue and gold, or + red and yellow. Like it or not, we are granted many freedoms by the U.S. + Constitution, and saying the Pledge before a public meeting is simply a way + of recognizing those freedoms. That's all. + + Sincerely, + [Author's name removed for privacy]

Infernal Affairs Commission

SteveOstrowski — 2006-11-25 13:28:19

Page deleted (Doesn't exist)

Differences for Infernal Affairs Commission

Deletions are marked with - .	Additions are marked with +.
Line 1:	Line 1:
- ''People applying to ["Internal Affairs Commission" IAC] be advised that you might receive somewhat threatening/insulting/patronizing reactions in the course of your job. In most cases, however, the responses are from people who do not fully understand the role of the commission and are almost comical. Here is a recent example that was sent out to not only the commission but most of ASUCD Government as well:'' - - Dear Internal Affairs Commissioners, - - I was shocked to learn that you voted down the Pledge of Allegiance bill. I - read the bill, it is well-written and perfectly fair. I cannot understand - how all of you, in your right minds, could vote against a bill to say the - Pledge of Allegiance to the U.S. flag. - - Your "no" vote just doesn't make any sense. Especially when considering - that UC Davis, as a public research university, relies on funding from the - STATE and FEDERAL levels of government. - Your decision rings with ingratitude for the deluge of money that the - state and federal governments rain down on this school. - - Every time the ASUCD Senate has their meeting, many different opinions - bounce around the room. Isn't it wonderful that the U.S. Constitution - allows for that freedom of speech, without any fear of retribution from the - government? Voting "no" on this bill is a disservice to the principles that - even allow ASUCD to exist. - - Any and every reputable political body in the entire nation says the Pledge - of Allegiance before their meetings begin. You are all incredibly immature - for voting down this bill, especially since reciting the Pledge, or even - standing up to recognize the flag, would be optional. - - And for those of you who are worried about self-preservation... - Congratulations on having this in your permanent political record. I hope - you realize that your chance for ever getting elected to any public office - is ruined, for the rest of your lives. - - No discerning citizen would vote for a man/woman to represent them, if that - man/woman is on RECORD saying that the Pledge of Allegiance is not good - enough to be said, aloud, in a public university. Especially since the - recitation of the Pledge, in this and in every situation, is optional. - - I'm not trying to be mean-spirited about this particular point, but let's - face it. If you ever run for any public office, your chances of victory are - very slim if the media somehow discovers your "no" vote. - - You have also slimmed your chances of getting hired by any - non-governmental organization or business that would take issue with your - vote. All companies do background checks, as I'm sure you are well aware. - - So I wish you the best of luck in your future ventures, because with this - embarassing affair on record, you'll need it. - - Shame on you, those who voted "no." You're not even elected officials. Let - the Senators, elected by popular vote, do the legislating in ASUCD, - especially when it comes to bills of such incredible importance as this one. - - When it comes down to principles, we as people don't bleed blue and gold, or - red and yellow. Like it or not, we are granted many freedoms by the U.S. - Constitution, and saying the Pledge before a public meeting is simply a way - of recognizing those freedoms. That's all. - - Sincerely, - [Author's name removed for privacy]	+ deleted

Infernal Affairs Commission

JasonAller — 2006-10-07 08:59:35

link

Differences for Infernal Affairs Commission

Deletions are marked with - .	Additions are marked with +.
Line 1:	Line 1:
- ''People applying to IAC be advised that you might receive somewhat threatening/insulting/patronizing reactions in the course of your job. In most cases, however, the responses are from people who do not fully understand the role of the commission and are almost comical. Here is a recent example that was sent out to not only the commission but most of ASUCD Government as well:''	+ ''People applying to ["Internal Affairs Commission" IAC] be advised that you might receive somewhat threatening/insulting/patronizing reactions in the course of your job. In most cases, however, the responses are from people who do not fully understand the role of the commission and are almost comical. Here is a recent example that was sent out to not only the commission but most of ASUCD Government as well:''

Infernal Affairs Commission

JosephBleckman — 2006-10-06 18:36:25

Differences for Infernal Affairs Commission

Deletions are marked with - .	Additions are marked with +.
Line 1:	Line 1:
	+ ''People applying to IAC be advised that you might receive somewhat threatening/insulting/patronizing reactions in the course of your job. In most cases, however, the responses are from people who do not fully understand the role of the commission and are almost comical. Here is a recent example that was sent out to not only the commission but most of ASUCD Government as well:'' + + Dear Internal Affairs Commissioners, + + I was shocked to learn that you voted down the Pledge of Allegiance bill. I + read the bill, it is well-written and perfectly fair. I cannot understand + how all of you, in your right minds, could vote against a bill to say the + Pledge of Allegiance to the U.S. flag. + + Your "no" vote just doesn't make any sense. Especially when considering + that UC Davis, as a public research university, relies on funding from the + STATE and FEDERAL levels of government. + Your decision rings with ingratitude for the deluge of money that the + state and federal governments rain down on this school. + + Every time the ASUCD Senate has their meeting, many different opinions + bounce around the room. Isn't it wonderful that the U.S. Constitution + allows for that freedom of speech, without any fear of retribution from the + government? Voting "no" on this bill is a disservice to the principles that + even allow ASUCD to exist. + + Any and every reputable political body in the entire nation says the Pledge + of Allegiance before their meetings begin. You are all incredibly immature + for voting down this bill, especially since reciting the Pledge, or even + standing up to recognize the flag, would be optional. + + And for those of you who are worried about self-preservation... + Congratulations on having this in your permanent political record. I hope + you realize that your chance for ever getting elected to any public office + is ruined, for the rest of your lives. + + No discerning citizen would vote for a man/woman to represent them, if that + man/woman is on RECORD saying that the Pledge of Allegiance is not good + enough to be said, aloud, in a public university. Especially since the + recitation of the Pledge, in this and in every situation, is optional. + + I'm not trying to be mean-spirited about this particular point, but let's + face it. If you ever run for any public office, your chances of victory are + very slim if the media somehow discovers your "no" vote. + + You have also slimmed your chances of getting hired by any + non-governmental organization or business that would take issue with your + vote. All companies do background checks, as I'm sure you are well aware. + + So I wish you the best of luck in your future ventures, because with this + embarassing affair on record, you'll need it. + + Shame on you, those who voted "no." You're not even elected officials. Let + the Senators, elected by popular vote, do the legislating in ASUCD, + especially when it comes to bills of such incredible importance as this one. + + When it comes down to principles, we as people don't bleed blue and gold, or + red and yellow. Like it or not, we are granted many freedoms by the U.S. + Constitution, and saying the Pledge before a public meeting is simply a way + of recognizing those freedoms. That's all. + + Sincerely, + [Author's name removed for privacy]