Recent Changes for "Jesse Rosales" - Davis Wiki

Jesse Rosales

JasonAller — 2008-09-25 18:42:21

link fixes

Differences for Jesse Rosales

Deletions are marked with - .	Additions are marked with +.
Line 35:	Line 35:
- [[comments]] - ------	+ [[Comments]] +
Line 62:	Line 62:
- ASUCD Bylaw 401 (C) states::: (1) '''Active campaigning''' shall be defined as verbal or physical actions taken by a candidate, group of candidates, or other individual(s) in an attempt to persuade voters to support their chosen cause such as the Election itself, specific candidate(s), Ballot Measures, or any other issue/idea related to any entity participating in an ASUCD Election. -["JimSchwab"]	+ ASUCD Bylaw 401 (C) states::: (1) '''Active campaigning''' shall be defined as verbal or physical actions taken by a candidate, group of candidates, or other individual(s) in an attempt to persuade voters to support their chosen cause such as the Election itself, specific candidate(s), Ballot Measures, or any other issue/idea related to any entity participating in an ASUCD Election. -["Users/JimSchwab"]
Line 65:	Line 65:
- * I do know. I also know the ["LEAD"] candidates did not cheat. -["JimSchwab"]	+ * I do know. I also know the ["LEAD"] candidates did not cheat. -["Users/JimSchwab"]
Line 67:	Line 67:
- * I think that's a bit of false logic to say the ["GO"] controversies are a pro-["LEAD"] slant. The ["GO"] controversies are better labeled an anti-["GO"] slant, if you want to label them at all. When ["FUCK"] posted all the crap about ["Student Focus"] it was not labeled pro-["FUCK"]/["SOSSS"] (as cool as that sounds). -["JamesSchwab"]	+ * I think that's a bit of false logic to say the ["GO"] controversies are a pro-["LEAD"] slant. The ["GO"] controversies are better labeled an anti-["GO"] slant, if you want to label them at all. When ["FUCK"] posted all the crap about ["Student Focus"] it was not labeled pro-["FUCK"]/["SOSSS"] (as cool as that sounds). -["Users/JamesSchwab"]
Line 91:	Line 91:
- * Top sum it up he described active campaigning. - ["JimSchwab"]	+ * Top sum it up he described active campaigning. - ["Users/JimSchwab"]
Line 111:	Line 111:
- -["GregWebb"]	+ -["Users/GregWebb"]

Jesse Rosales

PaulAmnuaypayoat — 2008-05-26 11:57:21

Links. Also, rewrote text to clarify what apparently happened

Differences for Jesse Rosales

Deletions are marked with - .	Additions are marked with +.
Line 5:	Line 5:
- Rosales became a center for controversy during the 2008 ASUCD budget hearings, where he was extremely intoxicated while attending, and was asked to leave by the president. See http://theaggie.org/article/822 and http://theaggie.org/article/824 for more information.	+ Rosales became a center for controversy during the 2008 ["ASUCD"] budget hearings, where the president determined that he was extremely intoxicated while attending. The president asked Rosales to leave as a result of that determination. See http://theaggie.org/article/822 and http://theaggie.org/article/824 for more information.
Line 107:	Line 107:
- ''2008-05-26 03:37:06'' [[nbsp]] Wait, if the writer of the article, James Noonan, was indeed correct in asserting that Rosales was intoxicated at the meeting, why is this incident being reported in the opinion section of the Aggie rather than some other section that implies fact and not opinion; perhaps the front page or something? We should remember that the Aggie is not infallible, and therefore strive to gain our own access to first hand evidence for our own sake. To be more accurate, I would suggest someone who was actually there write some text describing the incident and making the appropriate attribution. I mean, the people who made the accusations need to be just as responsible for their actions as Rosales is for being drunk in the first place, in case there truly was any malice on the part of Rosales' accusers. Note that this standard is not the same when dealing with sexual assault and rape allegations. --["Users/PaulAmnuaypayoat"]	+ ''2008-05-26 03:37:06'' [[nbsp]] Wait, if the writer of the article, James Noonan, was indeed correct in asserting that Rosales was intoxicated at the meeting, why is this incident being reported in the opinion section of the ["California Aggie" Aggie] rather than some other section that implies fact and not opinion; perhaps the front page or something? We should remember that the ["California Aggie" Aggie] is not infallible, and therefore strive to gain our own access to first hand evidence for our own sake. To be more accurate, I would suggest someone who was actually there write some text describing the incident and making the appropriate attribution. I mean, the people who made the accusations need to be just as responsible for their actions as Rosales is for being drunk in the first place, in case there truly was any malice on the part of Rosales' accusers. Note that this standard is not the same when dealing with sexual assault and rape allegations. --["Users/PaulAmnuaypayoat"]

Jesse Rosales

EdWins — 2008-05-26 10:36:21

(quick edit)

Differences for Jesse Rosales

Deletions are marked with - .	Additions are marked with +.
Line 5:	Line 5:
- Rosales was at the center of a minor controversy during the 2008 ASUCD budget hearings, where he was extremely intoxicated while attending, and was asked to leave by the president. See http://theaggie.org/article/822 and http://theaggie.org/article/824 for more information.	+ Rosales became a center for controversy during the 2008 ASUCD budget hearings, where he was extremely intoxicated while attending, and was asked to leave by the president. See http://theaggie.org/article/822 and http://theaggie.org/article/824 for more information.

Jesse Rosales

GregWebb — 2008-05-26 10:14:51

It wasnt just Jesse

Differences for Jesse Rosales

Deletions are marked with - .	Additions are marked with +.
Line 110:	Line 110:
	+ * Ivan's intentions were probably good, you're thinking too much in the partisan context of things. Even if Jesse was completely sober the entire time, the budget would have come out the same way. I would say my latter point was part of the motivation for Rosales not caring more, why care when the president already has the 2/3 majority to get his budget? + -["GregWebb"]

Jesse Rosales

JoseBleckman — 2008-05-26 09:59:46

Comment added.

Differences for Jesse Rosales

Deletions are marked with - .	Additions are marked with +.
Line 108:	Line 108:
	+ ------ + ''2008-05-26 10:59:46'' [[nbsp]] Peake, I noted that the president who asked him to leave was of a rival party due to my concern over what Ivan was doing. By attempting to make one of the few elected representatives that was not in the president's party leave, that acted to decrease what little voice Rosales' constituents had there. I may be looking at the subtext of the situation, yes, but I'm sure you can appreciate the importance of someone doing so. I did not notice Jesse appearing intoxicated - although, I admit that I was too busy focusing on the budget, as opposed to the mannerisms of the Senators, and might have missed some aspects of his behavior. If Webb could elaborate further, that would be appreciated. --["Users/JoseBleckman"]

Jesse Rosales

PaulAmnuaypayoat — 2008-05-26 02:37:06

Comment added.

Differences for Jesse Rosales

Deletions are marked with - .	Additions are marked with +.
Line 106:	Line 106:
	+ ------ + ''2008-05-26 03:37:06'' [[nbsp]] Wait, if the writer of the article, James Noonan, was indeed correct in asserting that Rosales was intoxicated at the meeting, why is this incident being reported in the opinion section of the Aggie rather than some other section that implies fact and not opinion; perhaps the front page or something? We should remember that the Aggie is not infallible, and therefore strive to gain our own access to first hand evidence for our own sake. To be more accurate, I would suggest someone who was actually there write some text describing the incident and making the appropriate attribution. I mean, the people who made the accusations need to be just as responsible for their actions as Rosales is for being drunk in the first place, in case there truly was any malice on the part of Rosales' accusers. Note that this standard is not the same when dealing with sexual assault and rape allegations. --["Users/PaulAmnuaypayoat"]

Jesse Rosales

AndrewPeake — 2008-05-25 22:46:19

He fessed up at the meeting. sorry joe, not everything is a conspiracy.

Differences for Jesse Rosales

Deletions are marked with - .	Additions are marked with +.
Line 5:	Line 5:
- Rosales was at the center of a minor controversy during ASUCD budget hearings in May 2008, where some Senators from a rival party and a Director appointed to his job by a member of that same rival party claimed that he appeared to be intoxicated while attending, and he was asked to leave by the president from that rival party. See http://theaggie.org/article/822 and http://theaggie.org/article/824 for more information.	+ Rosales was at the center of a minor controversy during the 2008 ASUCD budget hearings, where he was extremely intoxicated while attending, and was asked to leave by the president. See http://theaggie.org/article/822 and http://theaggie.org/article/824 for more information.

Jesse Rosales

GregWebb — 2008-05-23 10:34:51

Comment added.

Differences for Jesse Rosales

Deletions are marked with - .	Additions are marked with +.
Line 104:	Line 104:
	+ ------ + ''2008-05-23 11:34:51'' [[nbsp]] Attendance of some senators was poor for fear of being Jesse Rosales. I loved budget hearings. --["Users/GregWebb"]

Jesse Rosales

JamesSchwab — 2008-05-23 09:47:22

Comment added.

Differences for Jesse Rosales

Deletions are marked with - .	Additions are marked with +.
Line 102:	Line 102:
	+ ------ + ''2008-05-23 10:47:22'' [[nbsp]] Did this rival party get him drunk and force him to come to the budget hearing and force him to disrupt it and misbehave? That's quite an evil conspiracy! --["Users/JamesSchwab"]

Jesse Rosales

JoseBleckman — 2008-05-23 09:39:39

Differences for Jesse Rosales

Deletions are marked with - .	Additions are marked with +.
Line 5:	Line 5:
- Rosales was at the center of a minor controversy during ASUCD budget hearings in May 2008, where he appeared to be intoxicated while attending and was asked to leave. See http://theaggie.org/article/822 and http://theaggie.org/article/824 for more information.	+ Rosales was at the center of a minor controversy during ASUCD budget hearings in May 2008, where some Senators from a rival party and a Director appointed to his job by a member of that same rival party claimed that he appeared to be intoxicated while attending, and he was asked to leave by the president from that rival party. See http://theaggie.org/article/822 and http://theaggie.org/article/824 for more information.

Jesse Rosales

PhilipNeustrom — 2008-05-22 16:30:44

some description rather than just aggie link

Differences for Jesse Rosales

Deletions are marked with - .	Additions are marked with +.
Line 5:	Line 5:
- Rosales was at the center of a minor controversy during ASUCD budget hearings in May 2008. See http://theaggie.org/article/822 and http://theaggie.org/article/824 for more information.	+ Rosales was at the center of a minor controversy during ASUCD budget hearings in May 2008, where he appeared to be intoxicated while attending and was asked to leave. See http://theaggie.org/article/822 and http://theaggie.org/article/824 for more information.

Jesse Rosales

OscarSabino — 2008-05-22 16:18:37

This should be incorporated somehow but I'm not sure what the protocol is

Differences for Jesse Rosales

Deletions are marked with - .	Additions are marked with +.
Line 4:	Line 4:
	+ + Rosales was at the center of a minor controversy during ASUCD budget hearings in May 2008. See http://theaggie.org/article/822 and http://theaggie.org/article/824 for more information.

Jesse Rosales

BrentLaabs — 2007-11-18 21:36:49

Comment added.

Differences for Jesse Rosales

Deletions are marked with - .	Additions are marked with +.
Line 98:	Line 98:
	+ ------ + ''2007-11-18 21:36:49'' [[nbsp]] I don't know about Jesse Rosales that much. But I do know his girlfriend. Jesse's got himself a girl, and I want to make her mine. And she's watching him with those eyes, and she's lovin' him with that body, I just know it. Yeah 'n' he's holding her in his arms late, late at night. You know, I wish that I had Jesse's girl. I wish that I had Jessie's girl! Where can I find a woman like that? I wish that I had Jesse's girl. --["Users/BrentLaabs"]

Jesse Rosales

JamesSchwab — 2007-11-18 21:31:04

Comment added.

Differences for Jesse Rosales

Deletions are marked with - .	Additions are marked with +.
Line 94:	Line 94:
	+ ------ + ''2007-11-18 21:31:04'' [[nbsp]] Brent- + + I don't think the definition of active campaigning requires proof of direction from a candidate or slate. '''...or other individual(s) in an attempt to persuade voters to support their chosen cause such as the Election itself, specific candidate(s), Ballot Measures, or any other issue/idea related to any entity participating in an ASUCD Election.''' --["Users/JamesSchwab"]

Jesse Rosales

BrentLaabs — 2007-11-18 21:21:37

Differences for Jesse Rosales

Deletions are marked with - .	Additions are marked with +.
Line 93:	Line 93:
- ------ - ''2007-11-18 21:17:03'' [[nbsp]] No, campaigning to intoxicated people with a mobile polling station two feet from them is wrong. --["Users/AndrewVatobob"]	+ Sure it's wrong, but Rosales wasn't there. I haven't seen anything say that he helped plan this -- it could have been independent supporters acting independently. --["Users/BrentLaabs"]

Jesse Rosales

AndrewVatobob — 2007-11-18 21:17:03

Comment added.

Differences for Jesse Rosales

Deletions are marked with - .	Additions are marked with +.
Line 93:	Line 93:
	+ ------ + ''2007-11-18 21:17:03'' [[nbsp]] No, campaigning to intoxicated people with a mobile polling station two feet from them is wrong. --["Users/AndrewVatobob"]

Jesse Rosales

AndrewVatobob — 2007-11-18 21:06:23

Comment added.

Differences for Jesse Rosales

Deletions are marked with - .	Additions are marked with +.
Line 91:	Line 91:
	+ ------ + ''2007-11-18 21:06:23'' [[nbsp]] No, campaigning to intoxicated people with a mobile polling station two feet from them is wrong. --["Users/AndrewVatobob"]

Jesse Rosales

WilliamLewis — 2007-11-18 21:04:23

(quick edit)

Differences for Jesse Rosales

Deletions are marked with - .	Additions are marked with +.
Line 83:	Line 83:
	+ You find me LEAD campaigning in the dorms or setting up voting stations near kegs while actively campaigning and I'll find fault with them. As it stands, I'm not really pro-LEAD, but rather anti-GO because of all of this shadiness. -wl

Jesse Rosales

BrentLaabs — 2007-11-18 21:03:45

woooo back in davis

Differences for Jesse Rosales

Deletions are marked with - .	Additions are marked with +.
Line 89:	Line 89:
	+ * To sum it up it sounds like people were shadily campaigning for Rosales, but that he did not do anything wrong himself. --["Users/BrentLaabs"]

Jesse Rosales

JamesSchwab — 2007-11-18 20:57:45

Differences for Jesse Rosales

Deletions are marked with - .	Additions are marked with +.
Line 88:	Line 88:
	+ * Top sum it up he described active campaigning. - ["JimSchwab"]

Jesse Rosales

PaulHarms — 2007-11-18 19:59:41

Differences for Jesse Rosales

Deletions are marked with - .	Additions are marked with +.
Line 80:	Line 80:
	+ * Yes, please. I'm curious as well. -Paul H

Jesse Rosales

HSeigenfeld — 2007-11-18 19:57:18

Comment added.

Differences for Jesse Rosales

Deletions are marked with - .	Additions are marked with +.
Line 85:	Line 85:
	+ ------ + ''2007-11-18 19:57:18'' [[nbsp]] To sum it up he said they did not do anything wrong. --["Users/HSeigenfeld"]

Jesse Rosales

AndrewVatobob — 2007-11-18 19:34:08

Comment added.

Differences for Jesse Rosales

Deletions are marked with - .	Additions are marked with +.
Line 82:	Line 82:
	+ ------ + ''2007-11-18 19:34:08'' [[nbsp]] First off, I didn’t post this based off of political bias, I posted this information because it didn't seem right to me. To my defense HSeignfeld, I wasn't intoxicated because I acted as the DD for the day, plus I’m not a fan of parties on Thursdays. At the party, they weren't trading drinks for votes, but the setup was defiantly suggesting it. I first thought that the laptops were out so that people could select music to play, but that quickly changed when three more where brought out. Everything fell together when I saw the keg handlers all sporting GO shirts that where turned inside out, and would give people a quick spew on Jesse before they handed out the alcohol + --["Users/AndrewVatobob"]

Jesse Rosales

HSeigenfeld — 2007-11-18 18:15:44

Comment added.

Differences for Jesse Rosales

Deletions are marked with - .	Additions are marked with +.
Line 80:	Line 80:
	+ ------ + ''2007-11-18 18:15:44'' [[nbsp]] He is finding fault in campaigning tactics used by both slates, while only meaning to attack the GO slate, he is as a byproduct attacking his own slate and their methods. --["Users/HSeigenfeld"]

Jesse Rosales

PaulAmnuaypayoat — 2007-11-18 17:32:26

2 replies to H

Differences for Jesse Rosales

Deletions are marked with - .	Additions are marked with +.
Line 70:	Line 70:
	+ * I think one factor here is that there are not enough regular ["GO"] users on this wiki to properly counter balance anything that anti-["GO"] users might write about. For example, when ["Users/BrentLaabs" Brent] created the ["Fall 2007 ASUCD Election/GO Controversies"] entry and tried to link to it from the ["Featured Page"], I was the one that had to go in and delete the link to it from the ["Featured Page"], and then aftwards I had to engage ["Users/BrentLaabs" Brent] in an edit war on the ["Fall 2007 ASUCD Election/GO Controversies" controversies] page to make it more compliant with wiki standards (not that I am 100% bias free, but I was acting out of a respect for wiki ethics). It would be nice to have more ["GO"] users monitoring the wiki, since like it or not, everyone in the community deserves representation. The concern at this point is the average wiki user, who might not have the experience and knowledge to realize that despite what has already been written, it might not necessarily be the case that ["LEAD"] is 100% innocent and ["GO"] is 100% not innocent. The ["Davis Wiki"] should shy away from such absolute statements when dealing with very subjective objects such as ["ASUCD"] politics, but there are some users who wish for otherwise, and therefore we need other users to exist as a balance. I know that this might seem like an ugly solution to petty politics, but unless we make it so that a trained moderator has to approve of all edits, we need as many people as possible to participate, so that the wiki can continue to "fix itself". - ["Paul Amnuaypayoat"]
Line 77:	Line 78:
- So to clear things up Jeremy Ross established that no shirts, fliers, or candidates could be within 100 feet of polling, and neither side in both situations was at fault. If you wish to argue that campaigning outside of those realms occured, it did but both sides were found doing this, and I would love to hear what lead thinks about attacking your parties own actions paul. --["Users/HSeigenfeld"]	+ So to clear things up Jeremy Ross established that no shirts, fliers, or candidates could be within 100 feet of polling, and neither side in both situations was at fault. If you wish to argue that campaigning outside of those realms occured, it did but both sides were found doing this, and I would love to hear what lead thinks about attacking your parties own actions Paul. --["Users/HSeigenfeld"] + * Could you elaborate on how ["Users/PaulHarms" Paul H.] attack his own party? - ["Paul Amnuaypayoat"]

Jesse Rosales

HSeigenfeld — 2007-11-18 17:28:07

Comment added.

Differences for Jesse Rosales

Deletions are marked with - .	Additions are marked with +.
Line 74:	Line 74:
	+ ------ + ''2007-11-18 17:28:07'' [[nbsp]] Sorry I did post that hastily, Jeremy Ross "let it slide" and allowed me to the right to verify (in the form of a measruing tape), which I did not elect to take. In this particular scenario I informed both her and the Lead supporters brandishing shirts (who were to close according to Jeremy Ross's established interpretation in this case), of their distance, Tracey like I said before not held accountable and I do not wish to hold her accountable, I only involved myself in that particular situation to make sure she was in the clear, you can ask her that personally. Furthermore I will establish once again that no beer was given for votes, and would challenege you to prove otherwise. And to the proximity to polling lead supporters were as close as any Go supporters considering in both cases polling was manned by supporters. + + So to clear things up Jeremy Ross established that no shirts, fliers, or candidates could be within 100 feet of polling, and neither side in both situations was at fault. If you wish to argue that campaigning outside of those realms occured, it did but both sides were found doing this, and I would love to hear what lead thinks about attacking your parties own actions paul. --["Users/HSeigenfeld"]

Jesse Rosales

PaulHarms — 2007-11-18 16:06:13

Comment added.

Differences for Jesse Rosales

Deletions are marked with - .	Additions are marked with +.
Line 72:	Line 72:
	+ ------ + ''2007-11-18 16:06:13'' [[nbsp]] Too bad for you Tracey actually asked Jeremy Ross to verify that her distance was appropriate...and he said yes. I wonder what he would have said if GO volunteers and supporters asked him about campaigning in front of kegs with laptops, or campaigning door to door in the dorms, or shouting homophobic slurs, or giving away free coffee, or giving away energy drinks to vote? Don't even try to put yourselves on the same level as LEAD this election. LEAD, by choice, did not break the rules. Is it petty to hold GO candidates to the rules they agreed not to break? NO. Why do we even have to explain why exchanging free beer or free energy drinks or free coffee for votes is bad? --["Users/PaulHarms"]

Jesse Rosales

JamesSchwab — 2007-11-18 15:29:53

Comment added.

Differences for Jesse Rosales

Deletions are marked with - .	Additions are marked with +.
Line 70:	Line 70:
	+ ------ + ''2007-11-18 15:29:53'' [[nbsp]] I don't understand your first sentence. Are you saying Tracey and some supporters, who you identify as African American for some reason, were actively campaigning within 100 feet? --["Users/JamesSchwab"]

Jesse Rosales

HSeigenfeld — 2007-11-18 15:11:51

Comment added.

Differences for Jesse Rosales

Deletions are marked with - .	Additions are marked with +.
Line 67:	Line 67:
	+ ------ + ''2007-11-18 15:11:51'' [[nbsp]] By the silo two known lead members (not wearing shirts) were within striking distance of candidate Tracey Zeng and other African American Lead supporters wearing their shirts actively campaigning within 100 feet of the two individuals manning the poll, Jeremy Ross is aware of this and did nothing and I left it at that. So please when reporting information on the "anti-go slant" do so fully informed and fairly to the anti-lead slant. As you may have noticed I am not hear nor on Tracey Zeng's page representing this information, but was asked to give it. The problem in my eyes is the bias put out in this and every other attack. Yes this is problem and it should be dealt with, but stop associating it with one slate and not the other. Lead has made it their agenda to misrepresent and assign blame and controversy to GO, we have not and will not ever lower ourselves to this level and I encourage you to flex your strength over the organization you founded and keep this pettiness out of politics. + --["Users/HSeigenfeld"]

Jesse Rosales

PaulAmnuaypayoat — 2007-11-18 14:33:54

reply to James, fixed previous statement

Differences for Jesse Rosales

Deletions are marked with - .	Additions are marked with +.
Line 64:	Line 64:
- * ["Users/HSeigenfeld"], could you, or anyone for that matter, elaborate for us what ["LEAD"] candidates have done that might be considered controversial, please? If at all possible, please follow the same format used on ["Fall 2007 ASUCD Election/GO Controversies" this page]. I feel that this wiki community has definitely seen a pro-["LEAD"] slant these past few days with regards to potential elections violations, and it would be enlightening for the rest of the ["Davis"] community if we could see what the ["LEAD"] people have allegedly done. - ["Paul Amnuaypayoat"] - * I think that's a bit of false logic to say the GO controversies are a pro-LEAD slant. The GO controversies are better labeled an anti-GO slant, if you want to label them at all. When FUCK posted all the crap about Student Focus it was not labeled pro-FUCK/SOSS (as cool as that sounds). -["JamesSchwab"]	+ * ["Users/HSeigenfeld"], could you, or anyone for that matter, elaborate for us what ["LEAD"] candidates have done that might be considered controversial, please? If at all possible, please follow the same format used on ["Fall 2007 ASUCD Election/GO Controversies" this page]. I feel that this wiki community has definitely seen a anti-["GO"] slant these past few days with regards to potential elections violations, and it would be enlightening for the rest of the ["Davis"] community if we could see what the ["LEAD"] people have allegedly done. - ["Paul Amnuaypayoat"] + * I think that's a bit of false logic to say the ["GO"] controversies are a pro-["LEAD"] slant. The ["GO"] controversies are better labeled an anti-["GO"] slant, if you want to label them at all. When ["FUCK"] posted all the crap about ["Student Focus"] it was not labeled pro-["FUCK"]/["SOSSS"] (as cool as that sounds). -["JamesSchwab"] + * You are right James, I fixed the above. I also laughed when I said your statement out loud :D - ["Paul Amnuaypayoat"]

Jesse Rosales

JamesSchwab — 2007-11-18 14:24:24

Differences for Jesse Rosales

Deletions are marked with - .	Additions are marked with +.
Line 65:	Line 65:
	+ * I think that's a bit of false logic to say the GO controversies are a pro-LEAD slant. The GO controversies are better labeled an anti-GO slant, if you want to label them at all. When FUCK posted all the crap about Student Focus it was not labeled pro-FUCK/SOSS (as cool as that sounds). -["JamesSchwab"]

Jesse Rosales

PaulAmnuaypayoat — 2007-11-18 14:04:51

links, formatting, and a reply to H

Differences for Jesse Rosales

Deletions are marked with - .	Additions are marked with +.
Line 16:	Line 16:
- * I have already been working with the Ski or Snowboard club to bring you a Rail Jam on Toomey Field. This event will feature the exhibition of world-class snowboarding talent performing tricks in front of and for college students. - * I have also been actively pursuing UFC as an event being held in the ARC Pavilion. UFC Fighting, enough said. - * As a top-tier agriculture school I feel it necessary to increase Agriculture Awareness and Outreach on the UC Davis campus through increased interaction with Ag student-organizations.	+ * I have already been working with the ["Ski or Snowboard club"] to bring you a Rail Jam on ["Toomey Field"]. This event will feature the exhibition of world-class snowboarding talent performing tricks in front of and for college students. + * I have also been actively pursuing UFC as an event being held in the ["The Pavilion at ARC" ARC Pavilion]. UFC Fighting, enough said. + * As a top-tier agriculture school I feel it necessary to increase Agriculture Awareness and Outreach on the ["UC Davis"] campus through increased interaction with Ag student-organizations.
Line 59:	Line 59:
- * Hmmmm let me see....ASUCD Bylaw 401 (C) states: - (1) '''Active campaigning''' shall be defined as verbal or physical actions taken by a candidate, group of candidates, or other individual(s) in an attempt to persuade voters to support their chosen cause such as the Election itself, specific candidate(s), Ballot Measures, or any other issue/idea related to any entity participating in an ASUCD Election. -["JimSchwab"]	+ * Hmmmm let me see.... + ASUCD Bylaw 401 (C) states::: (1) '''Active campaigning''' shall be defined as verbal or physical actions taken by a candidate, group of candidates, or other individual(s) in an attempt to persuade voters to support their chosen cause such as the Election itself, specific candidate(s), Ballot Measures, or any other issue/idea related to any entity participating in an ASUCD Election. -["JimSchwab"]
Line 62:	Line 62:
- ''2007-11-18 13:30:33'' [[nbsp]] Working in the legislature you must know there is a difference between how a law is written and how it is interpreted, while you may have the less important written portion down, you are lacking the interpretation, which is levied by the elections comittee, an attempt to mess with that interpretation would breed consequences for both slates, and I doubt you would want anything to happen to the lead candidates --["Users/HSeigenfeld"] - * I do know. I also know the LEAD candidates did not cheat. -["JimSchwab"]	+ ''2007-11-18 13:30:33'' [[nbsp]] Working in the legislature you must know there is a difference between how a law is written and how it is interpreted, while you may have the less important written portion down, you are lacking the interpretation, which is levied by the ["elections committee"], an attempt to mess with that interpretation would breed consequences for both ["slates"], and I doubt you would want anything to happen to the ["lead"] candidates --["Users/HSeigenfeld"] + * I do know. I also know the ["LEAD"] candidates did not cheat. -["JimSchwab"] + * ["Users/HSeigenfeld"], could you, or anyone for that matter, elaborate for us what ["LEAD"] candidates have done that might be considered controversial, please? If at all possible, please follow the same format used on ["Fall 2007 ASUCD Election/GO Controversies" this page]. I feel that this wiki community has definitely seen a pro-["LEAD"] slant these past few days with regards to potential elections violations, and it would be enlightening for the rest of the ["Davis"] community if we could see what the ["LEAD"] people have allegedly done. - ["Paul Amnuaypayoat"]

Jesse Rosales

MattBlair — 2007-11-18 13:55:48

si -> is

Differences for Jesse Rosales

Deletions are marked with - .	Additions are marked with +.
Line 62:	Line 62:
- ''2007-11-18 13:30:33'' [[nbsp]] Working in the legislature you must know there si a difference between how a law is written and how it is interpreted, while you may have the less important written portion down, you are lacking the interpretation, which is levied by the elections comittee, an attempt to mess with that interpretation would breed consequences for both slates, and I doubt you would want anything to happen to the lead candidates --["Users/HSeigenfeld"]	+ ''2007-11-18 13:30:33'' [[nbsp]] Working in the legislature you must know there is a difference between how a law is written and how it is interpreted, while you may have the less important written portion down, you are lacking the interpretation, which is levied by the elections comittee, an attempt to mess with that interpretation would breed consequences for both slates, and I doubt you would want anything to happen to the lead candidates --["Users/HSeigenfeld"]

Jesse Rosales

JamesSchwab — 2007-11-18 13:37:38

Differences for Jesse Rosales

Deletions are marked with - .	Additions are marked with +.
Line 63:	Line 63:
	+ * I do know. I also know the LEAD candidates did not cheat. -["JimSchwab"]

Jesse Rosales

HSeigenfeld — 2007-11-18 13:30:33

Comment added.

Differences for Jesse Rosales

Deletions are marked with - .	Additions are marked with +.
Line 61:	Line 61:
	+ ------ + ''2007-11-18 13:30:33'' [[nbsp]] Working in the legislature you must know there si a difference between how a law is written and how it is interpreted, while you may have the less important written portion down, you are lacking the interpretation, which is levied by the elections comittee, an attempt to mess with that interpretation would breed consequences for both slates, and I doubt you would want anything to happen to the lead candidates --["Users/HSeigenfeld"]

Jesse Rosales

JamesSchwab — 2007-11-18 13:18:22

Differences for Jesse Rosales

Deletions are marked with - .	Additions are marked with +.
Line 59:	Line 59:
	+ * Hmmmm let me see....ASUCD Bylaw 401 (C) states: + (1) '''Active campaigning''' shall be defined as verbal or physical actions taken by a candidate, group of candidates, or other individual(s) in an attempt to persuade voters to support their chosen cause such as the Election itself, specific candidate(s), Ballot Measures, or any other issue/idea related to any entity participating in an ASUCD Election. -["JimSchwab"]

Jesse Rosales

HSeigenfeld — 2007-11-18 13:06:04

Comment added.

Differences for Jesse Rosales

Deletions are marked with - .	Additions are marked with +.
Line 57:	Line 57:
	+ ------ + ''2007-11-18 13:06:04'' [[nbsp]] You do have the correct bylaws, the only problem is you do not know the definition of "active campaigning": flyering or wearing a partisan shirt is the current definition of active campaigning until that changes, it is "legal". While this may sound unethical, both sides were taking adavantage of this situation, I know for a fact lead members were campaigning (non-activdeely) and directing and a polling station within one hundred feet of a lead candidate on campus. So in light of fairness do not direct your biased attention towards the opposing slate, show respect and seek to change the bylaws if this is such an irritation. --["Users/HSeigenfeld"]

Jesse Rosales

MaxMikalonis — 2007-11-18 03:24:43

Differences for Jesse Rosales

Deletions are marked with - .	Additions are marked with +.
Line 48:	Line 48:
	+ + ASUCD Bylaw 411(C) States: + "Any candidate actively campaigning under one of the following conditions on any ASUCD Election Day shall receive one (1) violation point per offence. + (1) Within any one hundred (100) foot horizontal plane from any potential stationary polling station. + (2) Inside any computer lab on campus, including departmental computer labs and UC Davis Residence Hall computer labs. + '''(3) Actively campaigning to an individual while the individual is using any potential mobile polling station, such as an electronic device with Internet access.''' + + Any ''''non-candidate'''' in violation of these rules will be removed from the premises and subject to referral to Student Judicial Affairs." + Now, I'm pretty sure that what you described above could fall under 411(C)(3). However, if it wasn't Jesse, then no violation points can be assessed. Either way, it still isn't legal, and SJA could come knocking soon. -["Users/MaxMikalonis" MM]

Jesse Rosales

PaulAmnuaypayoat — 2007-11-18 03:11:34

reply to William and H

Differences for Jesse Rosales

Deletions are marked with - .	Additions are marked with +.
Line 4:	Line 4:
-
Line 42:	Line 41:
- Legislate against such things? Campaigning by polling stations is already against the ASUCD bylaws. GO or whoever Eric Friedman affiliates himself with will just continue to ignore the rules anyway. They already campaigned in the dorms when that's not ok. -wl	+ * Legislate against such things? Campaigning by polling stations is already against the ASUCD bylaws. GO or whoever Eric Friedman affiliates himself with will just continue to ignore the rules anyway. They already campaigned in the dorms when that's not ok. -wl + * I remember that William because I was part of the coalition back in January 2005 that created the massive election reform bill. I was specifically referring to the need for ["ASUCD"] to have a "no alcohol at the polling station" election rule similar to the no alcohol rule that the [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States US] government has for its elections. I am sure that once the investigations are complete, the ["GO"] people will be sanctioned appropriately for their misdeeds. - ["Paul Amnuaypayoat"]
Line 46:	Line 46:
- ''2007-11-18 01:43:36'' [[nbsp]] The point is no beer was given for a vote, many people voted for different candidates or not at all, and more importantly what occured did not violate any bylaws. --["Users/HSeigenfeld"]	+ ''2007-11-18 01:43:36'' [[nbsp]] The point is no beer was given for a vote, many people voted for different candidates or not at all, and more importantly what occurred did not violate any bylaws. --["Users/HSeigenfeld"] + * ["Users/HSeigenfeld" H Seigenfeld], while what occurred may not have been against the bylaws, it definitely raises some moral questions about creating an environment of intoxicated voting. As I stated above, the [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States US] government (our real government), has laws against distributing alcohol too close to its own polling places for good reason. The fact that you publicly defended such action is quite frankly a bad idea in my opinion. Anyone trying to research you over the internet, such a future employer, will eventually see that you defended a grossly unfair set of actions in a very serious process (remember we are supposed to choose people who will manage TEN MILLION DOLLARS). Ask yourself, would you hire someone who just said what you said, especially when you need someone to be trustworthy? Remember, being "immoral" is not a protected class, and people will be allowed to discriminate against you for that. As for the bylaws, there is a chance that there will be bylaws created in the future to make illegal what you just tried to defend. I see from your profile that you are still kinda new to ["ASUCD"], and I would like to suggest that instead of joining the potentially ["GO" wrong] side of it, you might want to explore a ["FUCK" better] ["FUCKED" side] of it. There is still time for you to help make a positive difference in ["ASUCD"], if you choose to do so. - ["Paul Amnuaypayoat"]

Jesse Rosales

HSeigenfeld — 2007-11-18 01:43:36

Comment added.

Differences for Jesse Rosales

Deletions are marked with - .	Additions are marked with +.
Line 45:	Line 45:
	+ ------ + ''2007-11-18 01:43:36'' [[nbsp]] The point is no beer was given for a vote, many people voted for different candidates or not at all, and more importantly what occured did not violate any bylaws. --["Users/HSeigenfeld"]

Jesse Rosales

WilliamLewis — 2007-11-17 19:39:53

(quick edit)

Differences for Jesse Rosales

Deletions are marked with - .	Additions are marked with +.
Line 42:	Line 42:
	+ Legislate against such things? Campaigning by polling stations is already against the ASUCD bylaws. GO or whoever Eric Friedman affiliates himself with will just continue to ignore the rules anyway. They already campaigned in the dorms when that's not ok. -wl

Jesse Rosales

EliYani — 2007-11-17 17:33:20

Comment added.

Differences for Jesse Rosales

Deletions are marked with - .	Additions are marked with +.
Line 42:	Line 42:
	+ ------ + ''2007-11-17 17:33:20'' [[nbsp]] Andrew's story isn't an isolated incident, someone who lives on my floor said the exact same thing to me two days ago. I suppose it's too easy to blame intoxication when you caused it, eh? --["Users/EliYani"]

Jesse Rosales

PaulAmnuaypayoat — 2007-11-17 16:34:31

Comment added.

Differences for Jesse Rosales

Deletions are marked with - .	Additions are marked with +.
Line 40:	Line 40:
	+ ------ + ''2007-11-17 16:34:31'' [[nbsp]] LOL, this is funny. I did a quick ["Facebook"] investigation and at this time can conclude that ["AndrewVatobob"] is really Andrew Vargas, and that ["HSeigenfeld"] is using his ["Importance of using your RealName" real name"]. Based on each person's ["Facebook"] profile picture history, I can conclude that ["HSeigenfeld"] is a ["GO"] supporter, but that ["AndrewVatobob"]'s political bias is currently unknown, if there even is any. I don't know if the allegations are true or not, but I still think it would be a good idea to legislate against such behavior for future ["ASUCD elections"]. --["Users/PaulAmnuaypayoat"]

Jesse Rosales

HSeigenfeld — 2007-11-17 16:19:14

Comment added.

Differences for Jesse Rosales

Deletions are marked with - .	Additions are marked with +.
Line 38:	Line 38:
	+ ------ + ''2007-11-17 16:19:14'' [[nbsp]] There is no need to go into detail, because I know this will just turn into an arguement, but I know for a fact that what you are reporting is inaccurate. Maybe, it had something to do with the fact that you were drinking and intoxicated, and just can't remember what actually happened? --["Users/HSeigenfeld"]

Jesse Rosales

PaulAmnuaypayoat — 2007-11-17 14:25:01

reply to Andrew

Differences for Jesse Rosales

Deletions are marked with - .	Additions are marked with +.
Line 1:	Line 1:
-
Line 35:	Line 34:
- -
Line 40:	Line 37:
	+ * Heh, wow, funny you bring this up now. I don't think anyone has thought about this in the past. Well, I believe the [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States US] government has some laws against distributing alcohol too close to their own polling places, but I don't know exactly how one would find it for reference. Since ["ASUCD"] is modeled after the [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States US] government, it might be a good idea for someone, or perhaps a group of people, to create some legislation making such activity illegal. At the very least, you might as well let the ["Elections Committee"] know of your suspicion. - ["Paul Amnuaypayoat"]

Jesse Rosales

AndrewVatobob — 2007-11-17 13:07:22

Comment added.

Differences for Jesse Rosales

Deletions are marked with - .	Additions are marked with +.
Line 38:	Line 38:
	+ ------ + ''2007-11-17 13:07:22'' [[nbsp]] Forget the controversy about the 2006 elections, what about the Thursday Mixed Shoes party. They placed three commuters connected to the Internet right next to the beer kegs. Every time a person would go up for a drink, one of the AGR members would "carefully" ask you if you heard about Jesse, I was asked, "do you know Jesse Morales, did you vote for him? You should vote for him." And they passed the drink. Then I turned my back, and saw the three computers conveniently logged onto the ucd-voting page. I may be wrong, but that sounds alot worse then free energy drinks while campaigning. --["Users/AndrewVatobob"]

Jesse Rosales

JabberWokky — 2007-11-16 14:05:05

Candidate -> Officeholder

Differences for Jesse Rosales

Deletions are marked with - .	Additions are marked with +.
Line 1:	Line 1:
- [[Include(Fall 2007 ASUCD Election/Nav, right, 25%)]]
Line 3:	Line 2:
- '''Jesse Rosales''' is a candidate for ["ASUCD"] ["ASUCD Senate" Senate] in the ["Fall 2007 ASUCD Election"] running on the ["GO"] ["slate"].	+ '''Jesse Rosales''' is a member of the ["ASUCD Senate"], having won office in the ["Fall 2007 ASUCD Election"] running on the ["GO"] ["slate"].
Line 5:	Line 4:
- He felt that the Fall of 2007 would be a prime time to make another attempt at becoming a student government senator, so as to better help the student body. His platform to bring a rail jam to UC Davis still remains. Progress has been made in conjunction with the Ski Or Snowboard Club. Rosales received the ["Davis College Republicans"] endorsement on November 14, 2007.	+ His platform to bring a rail jam to UC Davis still remains. Progress has been made in conjunction with the Ski Or Snowboard Club.
Line 7:	Line 6:
- '''Fall 2006 Senate Run'''
Line 9:	Line 7:
- He previously ran for ["ASUCD"] ["ASUCD Senate" Senate] on the ["Student Focus"] ["slate"] in the ["Fall 2006 ASUCD Election"]. A minor controversy involved his giving out free energy drinks at a table adorned with his campaign fliers. No court case was filed because his bid was unsuccessful and the drinks were part of a promotion unrelated to his Senate bid (Senate candidates are often involved with multiple organizations, due to the candidates' level of activity on campus). The first time he ran for ASUCD Senate he promised to bring a rail jam to the campus on the UC Davis quad. At the time he didn't have any cost estimates.	+ =Fall 2007 Election=
Line 11:	Line 9:
- = 2007 Candidate Statement =	+ [[Include(Fall 2007 ASUCD Election/Nav)]] + + Rosales received the ["Davis College Republicans"] endorsement on November 14, 2007. + + == 2007 Candidate Statement ==
Line 29:	Line 31:
	+ =Fall 2006 Election= + + He previously ran for ["ASUCD"] ["ASUCD Senate" Senate] on the ["Student Focus"] ["slate"] in the ["Fall 2006 ASUCD Election"]. A minor controversy involved his giving out free energy drinks at a table adorned with his campaign fliers. No court case was filed because his bid was unsuccessful and the drinks were part of a promotion unrelated to his Senate bid (Senate candidates are often involved with multiple organizations, due to the candidates' level of activity on campus). The first time he ran for ASUCD Senate he promised to bring a rail jam to the campus on the UC Davis quad. At the time he didn't have any cost estimates. +

Jesse Rosales

RonPayne — 2007-11-16 13:07:40

Differences for Jesse Rosales

Deletions are marked with - .	Additions are marked with +.
Line 5:	Line 5:
- He felt that the Fall of 2007 would be a prime time to make another attempt at becoming a student government senator, so as to better help the student body. His platform to bring a rail jam to UC Davis still remains. Progress has been made in conjunction with the Ski Or Snowboard Club. Rosales received the ["Davis College Republican"] endorsement on November 14, 2007.	+ He felt that the Fall of 2007 would be a prime time to make another attempt at becoming a student government senator, so as to better help the student body. His platform to bring a rail jam to UC Davis still remains. Progress has been made in conjunction with the Ski Or Snowboard Club. Rosales received the ["Davis College Republicans"] endorsement on November 14, 2007.

Jesse Rosales

RonPayne — 2007-11-16 13:07:23

Differences for Jesse Rosales

Deletions are marked with - .	Additions are marked with +.
Line 5:	Line 5:
- He felt that the Fall of 2007 would be a prime time to make another attempt at becoming a student government senator, so as to better help the student body. His platform to bring a rail jam to UC Davis still remains. Progress has been made in conjunction with the Ski Or Snowboard Club.	+ He felt that the Fall of 2007 would be a prime time to make another attempt at becoming a student government senator, so as to better help the student body. His platform to bring a rail jam to UC Davis still remains. Progress has been made in conjunction with the Ski Or Snowboard Club. Rosales received the ["Davis College Republican"] endorsement on November 14, 2007.

Jesse Rosales

BrentLaabs — 2007-11-12 18:03:02

+candidate statement

Differences for Jesse Rosales

Deletions are marked with - .	Additions are marked with +.
Line 3:	Line 3:
- '''Jesse Rosales''' is a candidate in the ["Fall 2007 ASUCD Election"], running under the ["GO"] ["slate"]	+ '''Jesse Rosales''' is a candidate for ["ASUCD"] ["ASUCD Senate" Senate] in the ["Fall 2007 ASUCD Election"] running on the ["GO"] ["slate"].
Line 11:	Line 11:
	+ = 2007 Candidate Statement = + + I will bring professional snowboarders, UFC fighting and increased Ag-outreach to the UC Davis campus. + What I will do: + + * I have already been working with the Ski or Snowboard club to bring you a Rail Jam on Toomey Field. This event will feature the exhibition of world-class snowboarding talent performing tricks in front of and for college students. + * I have also been actively pursuing UFC as an event being held in the ARC Pavilion. UFC Fighting, enough said. + * As a top-tier agriculture school I feel it necessary to increase Agriculture Awareness and Outreach on the UC Davis campus through increased interaction with Ag student-organizations. + + Qualifications: + + * ["Alpha Gamma Rho"] Fraternity Recruitment Chair + * Department of Wildlife, Fish, and Conservation Biology Field Assistant + * ["Ski or Snowboard Club"] + * Seneca Foods Corporation Field Representative, Yuba City/Marysville + + Furthermore, my motives for running are simple and sincere. The events I am planning are rare for college campuses to host and as a result, will gain UC Davis much deserved attention and excite students about more events to come. Thanks for your time and your consideration. + +

Jesse Rosales

JabberWokky — 2007-10-18 07:14:14

Layout, temporary until after election and the nav goes flat.

Differences for Jesse Rosales

Deletions are marked with - .	Additions are marked with +.
Line 7:	Line 7:
- =Fall 2006=	+ '''Fall 2006 Senate Run'''

Jesse Rosales

JabberWokky — 2007-10-18 05:51:32

Differences for Jesse Rosales

Deletions are marked with - .	Additions are marked with +.
Line 5:	Line 5:
- He previously ran for ["ASUCD"] ["ASUCD Senate" Senate] on the ["Student Focus"] ["slate"] in the ["Fall 2006 ASUCD Election"]. Senate candidates are almost always involved with multiple organizations, due to the candidates' level of activity on campus. The first time he ran for ASUCD Senate he promised to bring a rail jam to the campus on the UC Davis quad. At the time he didn't have any cost estimates.	+ He felt that the Fall of 2007 would be a prime time to make another attempt at becoming a student government senator, so as to better help the student body. His platform to bring a rail jam to UC Davis still remains. Progress has been made in conjunction with the Ski Or Snowboard Club.
Line 7:	Line 7:
- He felt that the Fall of 2007 would be a prime time to make another attempt at becoming a student government senator, so as to better help the student body. His platform to bring a rail jam to UC Davis still remains. progress has been made in conjunction with the Ski Or Snowboard Club.	+ =Fall 2006= + + He previously ran for ["ASUCD"] ["ASUCD Senate" Senate] on the ["Student Focus"] ["slate"] in the ["Fall 2006 ASUCD Election"]. A minor controversy involved his giving out free energy drinks at a table adorned with his campaign fliers. No court case was filed because his bid was unsuccessful and the drinks were part of a promotion unrelated to his Senate bid (Senate candidates are often involved with multiple organizations, due to the candidates' level of activity on campus). The first time he ran for ASUCD Senate he promised to bring a rail jam to the campus on the UC Davis quad. At the time he didn't have any cost estimates. +

Jesse Rosales

ilowis — 2007-10-18 00:29:18

Differences for Jesse Rosales

Deletions are marked with - .	Additions are marked with +.
Line 5:	Line 5:
- He previously ran for ["ASUCD"] ["ASUCD Senate" Senate] on the ["Student Focus"] ["slate"] in the ["Fall 2006 ASUCD Election"]. He had given out free energy drinks at a table adorned with his campaign fliers. No court case was filed because his bid was unsuccessful, plus because the drinks were in conjunction to a promotion he was taking part in, unrelated to his Senate bid. Senate candidates are almost always involved with multiple organizations, due to the candidates' level of activity on campus. The first time he ran for ASUCD Senate he promised to bring a snow day to the campus on the UC Davis quad. At the time he didn't have any cost estimates and did not contact the university to ask whether it was even possible.	+ He previously ran for ["ASUCD"] ["ASUCD Senate" Senate] on the ["Student Focus"] ["slate"] in the ["Fall 2006 ASUCD Election"]. Senate candidates are almost always involved with multiple organizations, due to the candidates' level of activity on campus. The first time he ran for ASUCD Senate he promised to bring a rail jam to the campus on the UC Davis quad. At the time he didn't have any cost estimates.
Line 7:	Line 7:
- He felt that the Fall of 2007 would be a prime time to make another attempt at becoming a student government senator, so as to better help the student body. His platform to bring a snow day to the UC Davis quad still remains but he estimates it will cost $3,000 and he is still not certain whether the university will approve putting snow on the quad.	+ He felt that the Fall of 2007 would be a prime time to make another attempt at becoming a student government senator, so as to better help the student body. His platform to bring a rail jam to UC Davis still remains. progress has been made in conjunction with the Ski Or Snowboard Club.
Line 10:	Line 10:
- ------ - ''2007-10-15 01:07:51'' [[nbsp]] BEST plan to combat global warming I've heard yet. Truck snow in, that's the answer... --["Users/PxlAted"] - ------ - ''2007-10-18 01:25:55'' [[nbsp]] these facts are so fucking wrong. the facts need to be set strait. he's pushing for a rail jam. a fun event because there is never anything going on in davis. and the thing would be put on by an outside company. snow used for these events --["Users/ilowis"]

Jesse Rosales

ilowis — 2007-10-18 00:25:55

Comment added.

Differences for Jesse Rosales

Deletions are marked with - .	Additions are marked with +.
Line 12:	Line 12:
	+ ------ + ''2007-10-18 01:25:55'' [[nbsp]] these facts are so fucking wrong. the facts need to be set strait. he's pushing for a rail jam. a fun event because there is never anything going on in davis. and the thing would be put on by an outside company. snow used for these events --["Users/ilowis"]

Jesse Rosales

PxlAted — 2007-10-15 00:07:51

Comment added.

Differences for Jesse Rosales

Deletions are marked with - .	Additions are marked with +.
Line 10:	Line 10:
	+ ------ + ''2007-10-15 01:07:51'' [[nbsp]] BEST plan to combat global warming I've heard yet. Truck snow in, that's the answer... --["Users/PxlAted"]

Jesse Rosales

JabberWokky — 2007-10-08 17:44:31

PHOTO NEEDED

Differences for Jesse Rosales

Deletions are marked with - .	Additions are marked with +.
Line 1:	Line 1:
	+ [[Include(Fall 2007 ASUCD Election/Nav, right, 25%)]] +

Jesse Rosales

WeMo — 2007-10-08 16:54:13

snow updates

Differences for Jesse Rosales

Deletions are marked with - .	Additions are marked with +.
Line 3:	Line 3:
- He previously ran for ["ASUCD"] ["ASUCD Senate" Senate] on the ["Student Focus"] ["slate"] in the ["Fall 2006 ASUCD Election"]. He had given out free energy drinks at a table adorned with his campaign fliers. No court case was filed because his bid was unsuccessful, plus because the drinks were in conjunction to a promotion he was taking part in, unrelated to his Senate bid. Senate candidates are almost always involved with multiple organizations, due to the candidates' level of activity on campus. He spent a year researching his previous platform objectives, such as events on the quad featuring snow, and has been working towards achieving those of them he found to be most sound. He felt that the Fall of 2007 would be a prime time to make another attempt at becoming a student government senator, so as to better help the student body.	+ He previously ran for ["ASUCD"] ["ASUCD Senate" Senate] on the ["Student Focus"] ["slate"] in the ["Fall 2006 ASUCD Election"]. He had given out free energy drinks at a table adorned with his campaign fliers. No court case was filed because his bid was unsuccessful, plus because the drinks were in conjunction to a promotion he was taking part in, unrelated to his Senate bid. Senate candidates are almost always involved with multiple organizations, due to the candidates' level of activity on campus. The first time he ran for ASUCD Senate he promised to bring a snow day to the campus on the UC Davis quad. At the time he didn't have any cost estimates and did not contact the university to ask whether it was even possible. + + He felt that the Fall of 2007 would be a prime time to make another attempt at becoming a student government senator, so as to better help the student body. His platform to bring a snow day to the UC Davis quad still remains but he estimates it will cost $3,000 and he is still not certain whether the university will approve putting snow on the quad.

Jesse Rosales

JoseBleckman — 2007-10-03 15:23:08

according to the news circulating at the time. I'll ask him next time I see him.

Differences for Jesse Rosales

Deletions are marked with - .	Additions are marked with +.
Line 3:	Line 3:
- He previously ran for ["ASUCD"] ["ASUCD Senate" Senate] on the ["Student Focus"] ["slate"] in the ["Fall 2006 ASUCD Election"] and was known as Jesse "Rockstar on the Quad" Rosales for his questionable practice of giving out free energy drinks at a table adorned with his campaign fliers. No court case was filed because his bid was unsuccessful. He supposedly spent a year researching his previous platform objectives, such as covering the quad with snow, and has been working towards achieving those of them he found to be most sound. He felt that the Fall of 2007 would be a prime time to make another attempt at becoming a student government senator, so as to better help the student body.	+ He previously ran for ["ASUCD"] ["ASUCD Senate" Senate] on the ["Student Focus"] ["slate"] in the ["Fall 2006 ASUCD Election"]. He had given out free energy drinks at a table adorned with his campaign fliers. No court case was filed because his bid was unsuccessful, plus because the drinks were in conjunction to a promotion he was taking part in, unrelated to his Senate bid. Senate candidates are almost always involved with multiple organizations, due to the candidates' level of activity on campus. He spent a year researching his previous platform objectives, such as events on the quad featuring snow, and has been working towards achieving those of them he found to be most sound. He felt that the Fall of 2007 would be a prime time to make another attempt at becoming a student government senator, so as to better help the student body.

Jesse Rosales

JabberWokky — 2007-10-03 09:24:22

Differences for Jesse Rosales

Deletions are marked with - .	Additions are marked with +.
Line 3:	Line 3:
- He previously ran for ["ASUCD"] ["ASUCD Senate" Senate] on the ["Student Focus"] ["slate"] in the ["Fall 2006 ASUCD Election"] and was known as Jesse "Rockstar on the Quad" Rosales for his questionable practice of giving out free energy drinks at a table adorned with his campaign flyers. No court case was filed because his bid was unsuccessful. He supposedly spent a year researching his previous platform objectives, such as covering the quad with snow, and has been working towards achieving those of them he found to be most sound. He felt that the Fall of 2007 would be a prime time to make another attempt at becoming a student government senator, so as to better help the student body.	+ He previously ran for ["ASUCD"] ["ASUCD Senate" Senate] on the ["Student Focus"] ["slate"] in the ["Fall 2006 ASUCD Election"] and was known as Jesse "Rockstar on the Quad" Rosales for his questionable practice of giving out free energy drinks at a table adorned with his campaign fliers. No court case was filed because his bid was unsuccessful. He supposedly spent a year researching his previous platform objectives, such as covering the quad with snow, and has been working towards achieving those of them he found to be most sound. He felt that the Fall of 2007 would be a prime time to make another attempt at becoming a student government senator, so as to better help the student body.

Jesse Rosales

PaulHarms — 2007-10-03 07:45:11

fun facts

Differences for Jesse Rosales

Deletions are marked with - .	Additions are marked with +.
Line 3:	Line 3:
- He previously ran for ["ASUCD"] ["ASUCD Senate" Senate] on the ["Student Focus"] ["slate"] in the ["Fall 2006 ASUCD Election"]. His bid was unsuccessful. He spent a year researching his previous platform objectives and has been working towards achieving those of them he found to be most sound. He felt that the Fall of 2007 would be a prime time to make another attempt at becoming a student government senator, so as to better help the student body.	+ He previously ran for ["ASUCD"] ["ASUCD Senate" Senate] on the ["Student Focus"] ["slate"] in the ["Fall 2006 ASUCD Election"] and was known as Jesse "Rockstar on the Quad" Rosales for his questionable practice of giving out free energy drinks at a table adorned with his campaign flyers. No court case was filed because his bid was unsuccessful. He supposedly spent a year researching his previous platform objectives, such as covering the quad with snow, and has been working towards achieving those of them he found to be most sound. He felt that the Fall of 2007 would be a prime time to make another attempt at becoming a student government senator, so as to better help the student body.

Jesse Rosales

JabberWokky — 2007-10-03 07:19:47

Current to top.

Differences for Jesse Rosales

Deletions are marked with - .	Additions are marked with +.
Line 1:	Line 1:
- Jesse Rosales was a candidate who ran for ["ASUCD"] ["ASUCD Senate" Senate] on the ["Student Focus"] ["slate"] in the ["Fall 2006 ASUCD Election"]. His bid was unsuccessful.	+ '''Jesse Rosales''' is a candidate in the ["Fall 2007 ASUCD Election"], running under the ["GO"] ["slate"]
Line 3:	Line 3:
- He spent a year researching his previous platform objectives and has been working towards achieving those of them he found to be most sound. He felt that the Fall of 2007 would be a prime time to make another attempt at becoming a student government senator, so as to better help the student body. This time he's running with ["GO"]. GO Jesse!	+ He previously ran for ["ASUCD"] ["ASUCD Senate" Senate] on the ["Student Focus"] ["slate"] in the ["Fall 2006 ASUCD Election"]. His bid was unsuccessful. He spent a year researching his previous platform objectives and has been working towards achieving those of them he found to be most sound. He felt that the Fall of 2007 would be a prime time to make another attempt at becoming a student government senator, so as to better help the student body. + + [[comments]]

Jesse Rosales

JoseBleckman — 2007-10-02 23:37:41

updates

Differences for Jesse Rosales

Deletions are marked with - .	Additions are marked with +.
Line 3:	Line 3:
- Join his Facebook [http://ucdavis.facebook.com/group.php?gid=2212287067 group].	+ He spent a year researching his previous platform objectives and has been working towards achieving those of them he found to be most sound. He felt that the Fall of 2007 would be a prime time to make another attempt at becoming a student government senator, so as to better help the student body. This time he's running with ["GO"]. GO Jesse!

Jesse Rosales

WilliamLewis — 2006-11-18 11:25:10

+ election info.

Differences for Jesse Rosales

Deletions are marked with - .	Additions are marked with +.
Line 1:	Line 1:
- Jesse Rosales is a candidate for ["ASUCD"] ["ASUCD Senate" Senate] in the ["Fall 2006 ASUCD Election"] on the ["Student Focus"] ["slate"].	+ Jesse Rosales was a candidate who ran for ["ASUCD"] ["ASUCD Senate" Senate] on the ["Student Focus"] ["slate"] in the ["Fall 2006 ASUCD Election"]. His bid was unsuccessful.

Jesse Rosales

SteveOstrowski — 2006-10-27 15:45:11

Differences for Jesse Rosales

Deletions are marked with - .	Additions are marked with +.
Line 2:	Line 2:
	+ + Join his Facebook [http://ucdavis.facebook.com/group.php?gid=2212287067 group].

Jesse Rosales

SteveOstrowski — 2006-10-27 15:33:53

Differences for Jesse Rosales

Deletions are marked with - .	Additions are marked with +.
Line 1:	Line 1:
	+ Jesse Rosales is a candidate for ["ASUCD"] ["ASUCD Senate" Senate] in the ["Fall 2006 ASUCD Election"] on the ["Student Focus"] ["slate"].