Recent Changes for "Measure X" - Davis Wiki

Measure X

JasonAller — 2009-11-08 15:34:01

Differences for Measure X

Deletions are marked with - .	Additions are marked with +.
Line 3:	Line 3:
- \|\| '''Election''' \|\| '''Summary''' \|\| '''Result''' \|\|	+ \|\|<30%> '''Election''' \|\|<60%> '''Summary''' \|\|<10%> '''Result''' \|\|

Measure X

JasonAller — 2009-11-07 13:19:11

Differences for Measure X

Deletions are marked with - .	Additions are marked with +.
Line 1:	Line 1:
- #redirect November 2005 Election/Measure X	+ ["Measures" Measure] letters are ["Recycling" recycled] over ["elections"]. Perhaps you are looking for information on one of the following: + + \|\| '''Election''' \|\| '''Summary''' \|\| '''Result''' \|\| + \|\| ["November 2005 Election/Measure X" November 2005 Election] \|\| ["Covell Village"] \|\|<#EE0000> '''Failed'''\|\| + + ------ + This is a ["Disambiguation" disambiguation page] -- a navigational aid which lists other pages that might otherwise share the same title. If an article link referred you here, you might want to go back and fix it to point directly to the intended page. + ------

Measure X

JasonAller — 2009-11-07 12:23:27

Renamed to "November 2005 Election/Measure X"

Differences for Measure X

Deletions are marked with - .	Additions are marked with +.
Line 1:	Line 1:
- Measure X was on the ["November 2005 Yolo County Election"] ballot. It proposed altering the ["Davis"] ["General Plan"] to include ["Covell Village"]. In other words, passage of Measure X was required for the creation of ["Covell Village"]. It [http://www.yoloelections.org/sites/elections/archives/20051108/davis_archive.html failed] by a vote of 12,578 NO to 8,843 YES (58.7% to 41.3%). - - From the Voter Information Pamphlet: - - {{{Shall amended Resolution No. 05-96, ammending the Davis General Plan to change the land use designations for - the Covell Village property from agriculture to residential and commercial uses, as set forth in the Resolution and - establishing the Baseline Project Features for development of the Covell Village Project be approved?}}} - - Some wiki users tried to ["Predict the Measure X Vote"]. - - == Pro-X campaign calls to voter cell phones == - - ''The following section was contributed to by several users and needs to be cleaned up for pronoun ambiguities.'' - - Apparently the Mayor (?) is using an automatic dialing system to spread a Yes on X message, calling from number 999-999-9999. An automated message from firefighter Bobby Weiss also has been spamming cell phones, calling from number 630. Phone numbers were obtained from voter registration records. Anything you put on those forms is a matter of public record, and if you list your cell phone number as a home number, then you're essentially giving them licence to phone-spam you. Problems like this will undoubtedly become more problematic for people doing away with their land lines. - - {{{It shall be unlawful for any person within the United States or - any person outside the United States if the recipient is within - the United States-- - (A) to make any call (other than a call made for emergency - purposes or made with the prior express consent of the called - party) using any automatic telephone dialing system or an - artificial or prerecorded voice-- - (iii) to any telephone number assigned to a paging - service, cellular telephone service, specialized mobile - radio service, or other radio common carrier service, or any - service for which the called party is charged for the call;}}} - Making my cell phone number a matter of public record -- since it's not unlisted, it already is anyway -- doesn't permit you to spam my cell phone. I didn't memorize the form I filled out, but I don't recall seeing anything that said by putting my number on the voter registration form I was giving blanket permission for anybody to spam my cell phone. IANAL but this seems like a pretty clear violation of the [http://www.tcpalaw.com/free/47usc.txt 1991 TCPA]. - - I didn't pay close attention to the message but my wife said it was from a former mayor. If so perhaps that explains some of the confusion. - - == Postcard Campaign == - - [[Image(postcard.front.jpg)]] - [[Image(postcard.back.jpg)]] - - [[Comments]] - - ''2005-10-31 18:32:22'' [[nbsp]] not quite on topic but, What do people think of the likelyhood of another lawsuit to stop CV if X passes? I would be surprized if the anit-growth people didn't try something. --["Users/RocksandDirt"] - ------ - ''2005-11-02 13:28:32'' [[nbsp]] 55% Yes, 45% no --["Users/SammyBallard"] - ------ - ''2005-11-02 15:42:48'' [[nbsp]] Mayor pro term Greenwald is against Measure X, so perhaps someone else is doing the spamming. --["Users/JesseSingh"] - ["Ruth Asmundson"] is the current mayor. - ------ - ''2005-11-02 16:21:43'' [[nbsp]] Was that the 999-999-9999 number that called me earlier today? --["Users/CraigBrozinsky"] - ------ - ''2005-11-02 17:03:00'' [[nbsp]] My mistake! --["Users/JesseSingh"] - ------ - ''2005-11-02 17:06:48'' [[nbsp]] Yes, it's the 999 number. I got the call twice. It was a man's voice on the message but conveniently his name is garbled. Who was it? I want to call his house. --["Users/JackHaskel"] - ------ - ''2005-11-12 21:02:07'' [[nbsp]] I received a pre-recorded Pro X message on my land home line from the Davis ex-mayor. The ex-mayor on my message was ["Maynard Skinner"]. --["Users/MikeCarr"] - ------ - ''2005-11-02 23:03:20'' [[nbsp]] it's possible the anti-x'ers are spamming to give the yes'ers a bad name. --["Users/ApolloStumpy"] - - And use a message from Ruth Asmundson? Your suggestion appears unlikely. - ["Users/SharlaDaly"] - ------ - ''2005-11-03 00:22:38'' [[nbsp]] Isn't it illegal to use auto dialers? --["Users/MichaelGiardina"] - ------ - ''2005-11-03 00:21:22'' [[nbsp]] there not using autodiliars, the university sells our phone numbers to whom evever wants it --["Users/PattyAllen"] - ------ - ''2005-11-03 00:59:49'' [[nbsp]] That may be true, but the message I got was without a doubt recorded. Beyond that, everyone got the same message. Do you think a human being manually dialed every sold phone number and then hit a 'playback button' Let's just assume so, that's just an inneficient auto dialer.... Anyhow, this is the first spam or commercial call I ever got on my cell phone... Here's my bet, this will be a serious issue in 3 years... --["Users/MichaelGiardina"] - ------ - ''2005-11-03 07:18:30'' [[nbsp]] There is a service that soccer teams use to send out announcements to the players. It has taken the place of the old "phone tree" method. The phone numbers are programmed in (manually) and then the coach can dial up one number and record a message. The system then calls all the numbers and leaves the message. It can even detect answering machines and wait for the beep before leaving the message. Each family signs a form giving permission. I believe that political campaigns are not restricted by the "Do not call" list, so they can use this. I would think after the Guidaro fiasco from the last election (where a developer paid for a telephone campaign without telling anyone - even the candidates) Yes'ers would know that Davis is turned off by this method. I believe that they have a Sacramento company running their campaign. --["Users/SharlaDaly"] - ------ - ''2005-11-03 12:50:37'' [[nbsp]] Unsolicited cell phone calls are illegal, under the 1991 TCPA, and will no doubt continue to be so. You can complain to your cell phone carrier and I think they will forward it to the authorities (the fines are big). Unless of course you have a land line automatically forwarded to your cell phone, in which case nothing is being done wrong. --["Users/KennethWaters"] - ------ - ''2005-11-06 13:44:33'' [[nbsp]] so is it true that Yolo County is subpoaened student voting records because of the whole pizza thing? That's what I saw on some hippie's sign outside of Safeway today. --["Users/ApolloStumpy"] - ------ - ''2005-11-06 14:03:10'' [[nbsp]] Freddie Oakley, Yolo County Clerk, has directed that the votes from the UCD polling station be counted, but kept together and set aside in case there is a legal response to the misconduct by the Yes on Measure X campaign members ("Pizzagate" and Norbi Kumagai, after being removed as the poll judge, caught the next day talking to people inside the polling station). Student votes are not the focus as non-students also voted there and students will be voting absentee and at their neighborhood polls too. Also, the votes will be counted and added to the total, so its OK to go ahead and use the UCD polling station, if it is more convenient than your neighborhood polling station. --["Users/SharlaDaly"] - ------ - ''2005-11-07 13:37:50'' [[nbsp]] I sympathize with general anti-growth sentiment, but do we really know that CV is a monster? It seems to me growth is a necessary evil, and the CV plan tries to make a green addition. --["Users/KevinCosta"] - ------ - ''2005-11-08 09:16:57'' [[nbsp]] if measure x fails, i hope that new mace un-enviromental development gets approved by the supervisors and f**s everyone on the east side. of course, the hippies won't apologize. --["Users/ApolloStumpy"] - ------ - ''2005-11-08 15:26:25'' [[nbsp]] Well, soon we'll find out, but I think the opposition to Measure X is based on the premise that all development is bad. I mean their biggest argument against it is that "it's not really affordable." Well, $600k houses ARE affordable for Davis. Even though most people can't afford to live in the Davis market, it's better than nothing. Plus all the anti-X people seem to have clustered into central Davis, and even there it seems a roughly 50/50 split. Since most people don't live in Central Davis, I'm suspecting the folks in the outlying areas will overwhelming vote for it. Especially when you say "Trader Joe's." Another thing I'm thinking is that the development in that area might give more of a presence to the north-east Davis, south of Nuggett... so maybe the ugly-orange shopping center might have an anchor tenant again... maybe they'll paint it a normal color?! Hyperbole. But fun. --["Users/JaimeRaba"] - Obviously all developement is not bad, just developement in Davis is. $600,000.00 is not affordable to a vast majority (~90%) of Davis residents. Covell Village is mainly aimed at people who do not live or work in Davis. It is not about providing housing to Davis residents, rather it is about enriching M. Corbett and his cronies. ["Users/PaulThober"]	+ #redirect November 2005 Election/Measure X

Measure X

JasonAller — 2009-10-21 19:34:08

made link direct

Differences for Measure X

Deletions are marked with - .	Additions are marked with +.
Line 1:	Line 1:
- Measure X was on the ["November 2005 Yolo County Election"] ballot. It proposed altering the ["Davis"] ["General Plan"] to include ["Covell Village"]. In other words, passage of Measure X was required for the creation of ["Covell Village"]. It [http://bit.ly/1m04wL failed] by a vote of 12,578 NO to 8,843 YES (58.7% to 41.3%).	+ Measure X was on the ["November 2005 Yolo County Election"] ballot. It proposed altering the ["Davis"] ["General Plan"] to include ["Covell Village"]. In other words, passage of Measure X was required for the creation of ["Covell Village"]. It [http://www.yoloelections.org/sites/elections/archives/20051108/davis_archive.html failed] by a vote of 12,578 NO to 8,843 YES (58.7% to 41.3%).

Measure X

KemblePope — 2009-10-21 15:23:15

Differences for Measure X

Deletions are marked with - .	Additions are marked with +.
Line 1:	Line 1:
- Measure X was on the ["November 2005 Yolo County Election"] ballot. It proposed altering the ["Davis"] ["General Plan"] to include ["Covell Village"]. In other words, passage of Measure X was required for the creation of ["Covell Village"]. It [http://www.yoloelections.org/returns/davis.html failed] by a vote of 12,578 NO to 8,843 YES (58.7% to 41.3%).	+ Measure X was on the ["November 2005 Yolo County Election"] ballot. It proposed altering the ["Davis"] ["General Plan"] to include ["Covell Village"]. In other words, passage of Measure X was required for the creation of ["Covell Village"]. It [http://bit.ly/1m04wL failed] by a vote of 12,578 NO to 8,843 YES (58.7% to 41.3%).

Measure X

KemblePope — 2009-10-21 15:22:12

data was wrong. official Yolo County data: http://bit.ly/1m04wL

Differences for Measure X

Deletions are marked with - .	Additions are marked with +.
Line 1:	Line 1:
- Measure X was on the ["November 2005 Yolo County Election"] ballot. It proposed altering the ["Davis"] ["General Plan"] to include ["Covell Village"]. In other words, passage of Measure X was required for the creation of ["Covell Village"]. It [http://www.yoloelections.org/returns/davis.html failed] by a vote of 10,971 NO to 7,326 YES (59.9% to 40.0%).	+ Measure X was on the ["November 2005 Yolo County Election"] ballot. It proposed altering the ["Davis"] ["General Plan"] to include ["Covell Village"]. In other words, passage of Measure X was required for the creation of ["Covell Village"]. It [http://www.yoloelections.org/returns/davis.html failed] by a vote of 12,578 NO to 8,843 YES (58.7% to 41.3%).

Measure X

JasonAller — 2009-03-13 21:36:42

(quick edit)

Differences for Measure X

Deletions are marked with - .	Additions are marked with +.
Line 1:	Line 1:
- Measure X was on the ["November 2005 Yolo County Election"] ballot. It proposed altering the ["Davis General Plan"] to include ["Covell Village"]. In other words, passage of Measure X was required for the creation of ["Covell Village"]. It [http://www.yoloelections.org/returns/davis.html failed] by a vote of 10,971 NO to 7,326 YES (59.9% to 40.0%).	+ Measure X was on the ["November 2005 Yolo County Election"] ballot. It proposed altering the ["Davis"] ["General Plan"] to include ["Covell Village"]. In other words, passage of Measure X was required for the creation of ["Covell Village"]. It [http://www.yoloelections.org/returns/davis.html failed] by a vote of 10,971 NO to 7,326 YES (59.9% to 40.0%).

Measure X

JasonAller — 2008-08-30 18:55:45

link fixes

Differences for Measure X

Deletions are marked with - .	Additions are marked with +.
Line 38:	Line 38:
	+ + ''2005-10-31 18:32:22'' [[nbsp]] not quite on topic but, What do people think of the likelyhood of another lawsuit to stop CV if X passes? I would be surprized if the anit-growth people didn't try something. --["Users/RocksandDirt"]
Line 39:	Line 41:
- ''2005-10-31 18:32:22'' [[nbsp]] not quite on topic but, What do people think of the likelyhood of another lawsuit to stop CV if X passes? I would be surprized if the anit-growth people didn't try something. --["RocksandDirt"]	+ ''2005-11-02 13:28:32'' [[nbsp]] 55% Yes, 45% no --["Users/SammyBallard"]
Line 41:	Line 43:
- ''2005-11-02 13:28:32'' [[nbsp]] 55% Yes, 45% no --["SammyBallard"]	+ ''2005-11-02 15:42:48'' [[nbsp]] Mayor pro term Greenwald is against Measure X, so perhaps someone else is doing the spamming. --["Users/JesseSingh"] + ["Ruth Asmundson"] is the current mayor.
Line 43:	Line 46:
- ''2005-11-02 15:42:48'' [[nbsp]] Mayor pro term Greenwald is against Measure X, so perhaps someone else is doing the spamming. --["JesseSingh"] - ["Ruth Asmundson"] is the current mayor. - -	+ ''2005-11-02 16:21:43'' [[nbsp]] Was that the 999-999-9999 number that called me earlier today? --["Users/CraigBrozinsky"]
Line 48:	Line 48:
- ''2005-11-02 16:21:43'' [[nbsp]] Was that the 999-999-9999 number that called me earlier today? --["CraigBrozinsky"]	+ ''2005-11-02 17:03:00'' [[nbsp]] My mistake! --["Users/JesseSingh"]
Line 50:	Line 50:
- ''2005-11-02 17:03:00'' [[nbsp]] My mistake! --["JesseSingh"]	+ ''2005-11-02 17:06:48'' [[nbsp]] Yes, it's the 999 number. I got the call twice. It was a man's voice on the message but conveniently his name is garbled. Who was it? I want to call his house. --["Users/JackHaskel"]
Line 52:	Line 52:
- ''2005-11-02 17:06:48'' [[nbsp]] Yes, it's the 999 number. I got the call twice. It was a man's voice on the message but conveniently his name is garbled. Who was it? I want to call his house. --["JackHaskel"]	+ ''2005-11-12 21:02:07'' [[nbsp]] I received a pre-recorded Pro X message on my land home line from the Davis ex-mayor. The ex-mayor on my message was ["Maynard Skinner"]. --["Users/MikeCarr"]
Line 54:	Line 54:
- ''2005-11-12 21:02:07'' [[nbsp]] I received a pre-recorded Pro X message on my land home line from the Davis ex-mayor. The ex-mayor on my message was ["Maynard Skinner"]. --["MikeCarr"]	+ ''2005-11-02 23:03:20'' [[nbsp]] it's possible the anti-x'ers are spamming to give the yes'ers a bad name. --["Users/ApolloStumpy"] + - And use a message from Ruth Asmundson? Your suggestion appears unlikely. - ["Users/SharlaDaly"]
Line 56:	Line 57:
- ''2005-11-02 23:03:20'' [[nbsp]] it's possible the anti-x'ers are spamming to give the yes'ers a bad name. --["ApolloStumpy"] - - And use a message from Ruth Asmundson? Your suggestion appears unlikely. - ["SharlaDaly"]	+ ''2005-11-03 00:22:38'' [[nbsp]] Isn't it illegal to use auto dialers? --["Users/MichaelGiardina"]
Line 59:	Line 59:
- ''2005-11-03 00:22:38'' [[nbsp]] Isn't it illegal to use auto dialers? --["MichaelGiardina"]	+ ''2005-11-03 00:21:22'' [[nbsp]] there not using autodiliars, the university sells our phone numbers to whom evever wants it --["Users/PattyAllen"]
Line 61:	Line 61:
- ''2005-11-03 00:21:22'' [[nbsp]] there not using autodiliars, the university sells our phone numbers to whom evever wants it --["PattyAllen"]	+ ''2005-11-03 00:59:49'' [[nbsp]] That may be true, but the message I got was without a doubt recorded. Beyond that, everyone got the same message. Do you think a human being manually dialed every sold phone number and then hit a 'playback button' Let's just assume so, that's just an inneficient auto dialer.... Anyhow, this is the first spam or commercial call I ever got on my cell phone... Here's my bet, this will be a serious issue in 3 years... --["Users/MichaelGiardina"]
Line 63:	Line 63:
- ''2005-11-03 00:59:49'' [[nbsp]] That may be true, but the message I got was without a doubt recorded. Beyond that, everyone got the same message. Do you think a human being manually dialed every sold phone number and then hit a 'playback button' Let's just assume so, that's just an inneficient auto dialer.... Anyhow, this is the first spam or commercial call I ever got on my cell phone... Here's my bet, this will be a serious issue in 3 years... --["MichaelGiardina"]	+ ''2005-11-03 07:18:30'' [[nbsp]] There is a service that soccer teams use to send out announcements to the players. It has taken the place of the old "phone tree" method. The phone numbers are programmed in (manually) and then the coach can dial up one number and record a message. The system then calls all the numbers and leaves the message. It can even detect answering machines and wait for the beep before leaving the message. Each family signs a form giving permission. I believe that political campaigns are not restricted by the "Do not call" list, so they can use this. I would think after the Guidaro fiasco from the last election (where a developer paid for a telephone campaign without telling anyone - even the candidates) Yes'ers would know that Davis is turned off by this method. I believe that they have a Sacramento company running their campaign. --["Users/SharlaDaly"]
Line 65:	Line 65:
- ''2005-11-03 07:18:30'' [[nbsp]] There is a service that soccer teams use to send out announcements to the players. It has taken the place of the old "phone tree" method. The phone numbers are programmed in (manually) and then the coach can dial up one number and record a message. The system then calls all the numbers and leaves the message. It can even detect answering machines and wait for the beep before leaving the message. Each family signs a form giving permission. I believe that political campaigns are not restricted by the "Do not call" list, so they can use this. I would think after the Guidaro fiasco from the last election (where a developer paid for a telephone campaign without telling anyone - even the candidates) Yes'ers would know that Davis is turned off by this method. I believe that they have a Sacramento company running their campaign. --["SharlaDaly"]	+ ''2005-11-03 12:50:37'' [[nbsp]] Unsolicited cell phone calls are illegal, under the 1991 TCPA, and will no doubt continue to be so. You can complain to your cell phone carrier and I think they will forward it to the authorities (the fines are big). Unless of course you have a land line automatically forwarded to your cell phone, in which case nothing is being done wrong. --["Users/KennethWaters"]
Line 67:	Line 67:
- ''2005-11-03 12:50:37'' [[nbsp]] Unsolicited cell phone calls are illegal, under the 1991 TCPA, and will no doubt continue to be so. You can complain to your cell phone carrier and I think they will forward it to the authorities (the fines are big). Unless of course you have a land line automatically forwarded to your cell phone, in which case nothing is being done wrong. --["KennethWaters"]	+ ''2005-11-06 13:44:33'' [[nbsp]] so is it true that Yolo County is subpoaened student voting records because of the whole pizza thing? That's what I saw on some hippie's sign outside of Safeway today. --["Users/ApolloStumpy"]
Line 69:	Line 69:
- ''2005-11-06 13:44:33'' [[nbsp]] so is it true that Yolo County is subpoaened student voting records because of the whole pizza thing? That's what I saw on some hippie's sign outside of Safeway today. --["ApolloStumpy"]	+ ''2005-11-06 14:03:10'' [[nbsp]] Freddie Oakley, Yolo County Clerk, has directed that the votes from the UCD polling station be counted, but kept together and set aside in case there is a legal response to the misconduct by the Yes on Measure X campaign members ("Pizzagate" and Norbi Kumagai, after being removed as the poll judge, caught the next day talking to people inside the polling station). Student votes are not the focus as non-students also voted there and students will be voting absentee and at their neighborhood polls too. Also, the votes will be counted and added to the total, so its OK to go ahead and use the UCD polling station, if it is more convenient than your neighborhood polling station. --["Users/SharlaDaly"]
Line 71:	Line 71:
- ''2005-11-06 14:03:10'' [[nbsp]] Freddie Oakley, Yolo County Clerk, has directed that the votes from the UCD polling station be counted, but kept together and set aside in case there is a legal response to the misconduct by the Yes on Measure X campaign members ("Pizzagate" and Norbi Kumagai, after being removed as the poll judge, caught the next day talking to people inside the polling station). Student votes are not the focus as non-students also voted there and students will be voting absentee and at their neighborhood polls too. Also, the votes will be counted and added to the total, so its OK to go ahead and use the UCD polling station, if it is more convenient than your neighborhood polling station. --["SharlaDaly"]	+ ''2005-11-07 13:37:50'' [[nbsp]] I sympathize with general anti-growth sentiment, but do we really know that CV is a monster? It seems to me growth is a necessary evil, and the CV plan tries to make a green addition. --["Users/KevinCosta"]
Line 73:	Line 73:
- ''2005-11-07 13:37:50'' [[nbsp]] I sympathize with general anti-growth sentiment, but do we really know that CV is a monster? It seems to me growth is a necessary evil, and the CV plan tries to make a green addition. --["KevinCosta"]	+ ''2005-11-08 09:16:57'' [[nbsp]] if measure x fails, i hope that new mace un-enviromental development gets approved by the supervisors and f***s everyone on the east side. of course, the hippies won't apologize. --["Users/ApolloStumpy"]
Line 75:	Line 75:
- ''2005-11-08 09:16:57'' [[nbsp]] if measure x fails, i hope that new mace un-enviromental development gets approved by the supervisors and f**s everyone on the east side. of course, the hippies won't apologize. --["ApolloStumpy"] - ------ - ''2005-11-08 15:26:25'' [[nbsp]] Well, soon we'll find out, but I think the opposition to Measure X is based on the premise that all development is bad. I mean their biggest argument against it is that "it's not really affordable." Well, $600k houses ARE affordable for Davis. Even though most people can't afford to live in the Davis market, it's better than nothing. Plus all the anti-X people seem to have clustered into central Davis, and even there it seems a roughly 50/50 split. Since most people don't live in Central Davis, I'm suspecting the folks in the outlying areas will overwhelming vote for it. Especially when you say "Trader Joe's." Another thing I'm thinking is that the development in that area might give more of a presence to the north-east Davis, south of Nuggett... so maybe the ugly-orange shopping center might have an anchor tenant again... maybe they'll paint it a normal color?! Hyperbole. But fun. --["JaimeRaba"] - Obviously all developement is not bad, just developement in Davis is. $600,000.00 is not affordable to a vast majority (~90%) of Davis residents. Covell Village is mainly aimed at people who do not live or work in Davis. It is not about providing housing to Davis residents, rather it is about enriching M. Corbett and his cronies. ["PaulThober"]	+ ''2005-11-08 15:26:25'' [[nbsp]] Well, soon we'll find out, but I think the opposition to Measure X is based on the premise that all development is bad. I mean their biggest argument against it is that "it's not really affordable." Well, $600k houses ARE affordable for Davis. Even though most people can't afford to live in the Davis market, it's better than nothing. Plus all the anti-X people seem to have clustered into central Davis, and even there it seems a roughly 50/50 split. Since most people don't live in Central Davis, I'm suspecting the folks in the outlying areas will overwhelming vote for it. Especially when you say "Trader Joe's." Another thing I'm thinking is that the development in that area might give more of a presence to the north-east Davis, south of Nuggett... so maybe the ugly-orange shopping center might have an anchor tenant again... maybe they'll paint it a normal color?! Hyperbole. But fun. --["Users/JaimeRaba"] + * Obviously all developement is not bad, just developement in Davis is. $600,000.00 is not affordable to a vast majority (~90%) of Davis residents. Covell Village is mainly aimed at people who do not live or work in Davis. It is not about providing housing to Davis residents, rather it is about enriching M. Corbett and his cronies. ["Users/PaulThober"]

Measure X

EdwinSaada — 2006-11-14 13:52:16

- comment.

Differences for Measure X

Deletions are marked with - .	Additions are marked with +.
Line 17:	Line 17:
- {{{It shall be unlawful for any person within the United States or - any person outside the United States if the recipient is within	+ {{{It shall be unlawful for any person within the United States or + any person outside the United States if the recipient is within
Line 20:	Line 20:
- (A) to make any call (other than a call made for emergency - purposes or made with the prior express consent of the called - party) using any automatic telephone dialing system or an	+ (A) to make any call (other than a call made for emergency + purposes or made with the prior express consent of the called + party) using any automatic telephone dialing system or an
Line 24:	Line 24:
- (iii) to any telephone number assigned to a paging - service, cellular telephone service, specialized mobile - radio service, or other radio common carrier service, or any	+ (iii) to any telephone number assigned to a paging + service, cellular telephone service, specialized mobile + radio service, or other radio common carrier service, or any
Line 45:	Line 45:
-	+
Line 79:	Line 79:
- ------ - ''2005-11-08 16:12:54'' [[nbsp]] The No people are certainly far more vocal/visible. --["EdwinSaada"] - ------ - ''2005-11-14 15:43:04'' [[nbsp]] LOUD NOISES --["JeremyGimbel"]

Measure X

JabberWokky — 2006-02-09 09:00:51

Added postcard.

Differences for Measure X

Deletions are marked with - .	Additions are marked with +.
Line 31:	Line 31:
	+ + == Postcard Campaign == + + [[Image(postcard.front.jpg)]] + [[Image(postcard.back.jpg)]]

Measure X

JabberWokky — 2006-02-09 09:00:19

Upload of image postcard.back.jpg.

Measure X

JabberWokky — 2006-02-09 08:59:47

Upload of image postcard.front.jpg.

Measure X

JeremyGimbel — 2005-11-14 14:43:04

Comment added.

Differences for Measure X

Deletions are marked with - .	Additions are marked with +.
Line 76:	Line 76:
	+ ------ + ''2005-11-14 15:43:04'' [[nbsp]] LOUD NOISES --["JeremyGimbel"]

Measure X

PaulThober — 2005-11-13 09:20:52

added attribution to comment

Differences for Measure X

Deletions are marked with - .	Additions are marked with +.
Line 73:	Line 73:
- * Obviously all developement is not bad, just developement in Davis is. $600,000.00 is not affordable to a vast majority (~90%) of Davis residents. Covell Village is mainly aimed at people who do not live or work in Davis. It is not about providing housing to Davis residents, rather it is about enriching M. Corbett and his cronies.	+ * Obviously all developement is not bad, just developement in Davis is. $600,000.00 is not affordable to a vast majority (~90%) of Davis residents. Covell Village is mainly aimed at people who do not live or work in Davis. It is not about providing housing to Davis residents, rather it is about enriching M. Corbett and his cronies. ["PaulThober"]

Measure X

MikeCarr — 2005-11-12 20:05:07

Differences for Measure X

Deletions are marked with - .	Additions are marked with +.
Line 49:	Line 49:
	+ ''2005-11-12 21:02:07'' [[nbsp]] I received a pre-recorded Pro X message on my land home line from the Davis ex-mayor. The ex-mayor on my message was ["Maynard Skinner"]. --["MikeCarr"] + ------
Line 74:	Line 76:
- ------ - ''2005-11-12 21:02:07'' [[nbsp]] I received a pre-recorded Pro X message on my land home line from the Davis ex-mayor. The ex-mayor on my message was Maynard Skinner. --["MikeCarr"]

Measure X

MikeCarr — 2005-11-12 20:02:07

Comment added.

Differences for Measure X

Deletions are marked with - .	Additions are marked with +.
Line 74:	Line 74:
	+ ------ + ''2005-11-12 21:02:07'' [[nbsp]] I received a pre-recorded Pro X message on my land home line from the Davis ex-mayor. The ex-mayor on my message was Maynard Skinner. --["MikeCarr"]

Measure X

KenjiYamada — 2005-11-08 23:16:11

converted to past, noted pronoun problems w/ cell phone section

Differences for Measure X

Deletions are marked with - .	Additions are marked with +.
Line 1:	Line 1:
- Measure X is on the ["November 2005 Yolo County Election"] ballot. It proposes altering the ["Davis General Plan"] to include ["Covell Village"]. In other words, passage of Measure X is required for the creation of ["Covell Village"].	+ Measure X was on the ["November 2005 Yolo County Election"] ballot. It proposed altering the ["Davis General Plan"] to include ["Covell Village"]. In other words, passage of Measure X was required for the creation of ["Covell Village"]. It [http://www.yoloelections.org/returns/davis.html failed] by a vote of 10,971 NO to 7,326 YES (59.9% to 40.0%).
Line 9:	Line 9:
- If you want you can ["Predict the Measure X Vote"].	+ Some wiki users tried to ["Predict the Measure X Vote"]. + + == Pro-X campaign calls to voter cell phones == + + ''The following section was contributed to by several users and needs to be cleaned up for pronoun ambiguities.''

Measure X

PaulThober — 2005-11-08 15:36:06

Differences for Measure X

Deletions are marked with - .	Additions are marked with +.
Line 67:	Line 67:
	+ * Obviously all developement is not bad, just developement in Davis is. $600,000.00 is not affordable to a vast majority (~90%) of Davis residents. Covell Village is mainly aimed at people who do not live or work in Davis. It is not about providing housing to Davis residents, rather it is about enriching M. Corbett and his cronies.

Measure X

EdwinSaada — 2005-11-08 15:12:54

Comment added.

Differences for Measure X

Deletions are marked with - .	Additions are marked with +.
Line 67:	Line 67:
	+ ------ + ''2005-11-08 16:12:54'' [[nbsp]] The No people are certainly far more vocal/visible. --["EdwinSaada"]

Measure X

JaimeRaba — 2005-11-08 14:26:25

Comment added.

Differences for Measure X

Deletions are marked with - .	Additions are marked with +.
Line 65:	Line 65:
	+ ------ + ''2005-11-08 15:26:25'' [[nbsp]] Well, soon we'll find out, but I think the opposition to Measure X is based on the premise that all development is bad. I mean their biggest argument against it is that "it's not really affordable." Well, $600k houses ARE affordable for Davis. Even though most people can't afford to live in the Davis market, it's better than nothing. Plus all the anti-X people seem to have clustered into central Davis, and even there it seems a roughly 50/50 split. Since most people don't live in Central Davis, I'm suspecting the folks in the outlying areas will overwhelming vote for it. Especially when you say "Trader Joe's." Another thing I'm thinking is that the development in that area might give more of a presence to the north-east Davis, south of Nuggett... so maybe the ugly-orange shopping center might have an anchor tenant again... maybe they'll paint it a normal color?! Hyperbole. But fun. --["JaimeRaba"]

Measure X

ApolloStumpy — 2005-11-08 08:16:57

Comment added.

Differences for Measure X

Deletions are marked with - .	Additions are marked with +.
Line 63:	Line 63:
	+ ------ + ''2005-11-08 09:16:57'' [[nbsp]] if measure x fails, i hope that new mace un-enviromental development gets approved by the supervisors and f***s everyone on the east side. of course, the hippies won't apologize. --["ApolloStumpy"]

Measure X

KevinCosta — 2005-11-07 12:37:50

Comment added.

Differences for Measure X

Deletions are marked with - .	Additions are marked with +.
Line 61:	Line 61:
	+ ------ + ''2005-11-07 13:37:50'' [[nbsp]] I sympathize with general anti-growth sentiment, but do we really know that CV is a monster? It seems to me growth is a necessary evil, and the CV plan tries to make a green addition. --["KevinCosta"]

Measure X

JeffreyNonken — 2005-11-06 19:47:32

More TCPA details. IANAL.

Differences for Measure X

Deletions are marked with - .	Additions are marked with +.
Line 12:	Line 12:
	+ + {{{It shall be unlawful for any person within the United States or + any person outside the United States if the recipient is within + the United States-- + (A) to make any call (other than a call made for emergency + purposes or made with the prior express consent of the called + party) using any automatic telephone dialing system or an + artificial or prerecorded voice-- + (iii) to any telephone number assigned to a paging + service, cellular telephone service, specialized mobile + radio service, or other radio common carrier service, or any + service for which the called party is charged for the call;}}} + Making my cell phone number a matter of public record -- since it's not unlisted, it already is anyway -- doesn't permit you to spam my cell phone. I didn't memorize the form I filled out, but I don't recall seeing anything that said by putting my number on the voter registration form I was giving blanket permission for anybody to spam my cell phone. IANAL but this seems like a pretty clear violation of the [http://www.tcpalaw.com/free/47usc.txt 1991 TCPA]. + + I didn't pay close attention to the message but my wife said it was from a former mayor. If so perhaps that explains some of the confusion.

Measure X

SharlaDaly — 2005-11-06 13:08:21

Differences for Measure X

Deletions are marked with - .	Additions are marked with +.
Line 45:	Line 45:
- ''2005-11-06 14:03:10'' [[nbsp]] Freddie Oakley, Yolo County Clerk, has directed that the votes from the UCD polling station be counted, but kept together and set aside in case there is a legal issue to those votes from the misconduct by the Yes on Measure X campaign members ("Pizzagate" and Norb Kumagai, after being removed as the judge, caught the next day campaigning inside the polling station). Student votes are not the focus as non-students also voted there. Also, the votes will be counted and added to the total, so its OK to go ahead and use the UCD polling station, if it is more convenient than your neighborhood polling station. --["SharlaDaly"]	+ ''2005-11-06 14:03:10'' [[nbsp]] Freddie Oakley, Yolo County Clerk, has directed that the votes from the UCD polling station be counted, but kept together and set aside in case there is a legal response to the misconduct by the Yes on Measure X campaign members ("Pizzagate" and Norbi Kumagai, after being removed as the poll judge, caught the next day talking to people inside the polling station). Student votes are not the focus as non-students also voted there and students will be voting absentee and at their neighborhood polls too. Also, the votes will be counted and added to the total, so its OK to go ahead and use the UCD polling station, if it is more convenient than your neighborhood polling station. --["SharlaDaly"]

Measure X

SharlaDaly — 2005-11-06 13:03:10

Comment added.

Differences for Measure X

Deletions are marked with - .	Additions are marked with +.
Line 44:	Line 44:
	+ ------ + ''2005-11-06 14:03:10'' [[nbsp]] Freddie Oakley, Yolo County Clerk, has directed that the votes from the UCD polling station be counted, but kept together and set aside in case there is a legal issue to those votes from the misconduct by the Yes on Measure X campaign members ("Pizzagate" and Norb Kumagai, after being removed as the judge, caught the next day campaigning inside the polling station). Student votes are not the focus as non-students also voted there. Also, the votes will be counted and added to the total, so its OK to go ahead and use the UCD polling station, if it is more convenient than your neighborhood polling station. --["SharlaDaly"]

Measure X

ApolloStumpy — 2005-11-06 12:44:33

Comment added.

Differences for Measure X

Deletions are marked with - .	Additions are marked with +.
Line 42:	Line 42:
	+ ------ + ''2005-11-06 13:44:33'' [[nbsp]] so is it true that Yolo County is subpoaened student voting records because of the whole pizza thing? That's what I saw on some hippie's sign outside of Safeway today. --["ApolloStumpy"]

Measure X

CraigBrozinsky — 2005-11-05 13:47:00

phone spam info

Differences for Measure X

Deletions are marked with - .	Additions are marked with +.
Line 11:	Line 11:
- Apparently the Mayor (?) is using an automatic dialing system to spread a Yes on X message, calling from number 999-999-9999. Since when does the mayor get to spam my cell phone? An automated message from firefighter Bobby Weiss also has been spamming cell phones, calling from number 630.	+ Apparently the Mayor (?) is using an automatic dialing system to spread a Yes on X message, calling from number 999-999-9999. An automated message from firefighter Bobby Weiss also has been spamming cell phones, calling from number 630. Phone numbers were obtained from voter registration records. Anything you put on those forms is a matter of public record, and if you list your cell phone number as a home number, then you're essentially giving them licence to phone-spam you. Problems like this will undoubtedly become more problematic for people doing away with their land lines.

Measure X

KennethWaters — 2005-11-03 11:50:37

Comment added.

Differences for Measure X

Deletions are marked with - .	Additions are marked with +.
Line 40:	Line 40:
	+ ------ + ''2005-11-03 12:50:37'' [[nbsp]] Unsolicited cell phone calls are illegal, under the 1991 TCPA, and will no doubt continue to be so. You can complain to your cell phone carrier and I think they will forward it to the authorities (the fines are big). Unless of course you have a land line automatically forwarded to your cell phone, in which case nothing is being done wrong. --["KennethWaters"]

Measure X

CraigBrozinsky — 2005-11-03 10:08:10

more cell phone spam

Differences for Measure X

Deletions are marked with - .	Additions are marked with +.
Line 11:	Line 11:
- Apparently the Mayor (?) is using an automatic dialing system to spread a Yes on X message. Since when does the mayor get to spam my cell phone?	+ Apparently the Mayor (?) is using an automatic dialing system to spread a Yes on X message, calling from number 999-999-9999. Since when does the mayor get to spam my cell phone? An automated message from firefighter Bobby Weiss also has been spamming cell phones, calling from number 630.

Measure X

SharlaDaly — 2005-11-03 06:18:30

Comment added.

Differences for Measure X

Deletions are marked with - .	Additions are marked with +.
Line 38:	Line 38:
	+ ------ + ''2005-11-03 07:18:30'' [[nbsp]] There is a service that soccer teams use to send out announcements to the players. It has taken the place of the old "phone tree" method. The phone numbers are programmed in (manually) and then the coach can dial up one number and record a message. The system then calls all the numbers and leaves the message. It can even detect answering machines and wait for the beep before leaving the message. Each family signs a form giving permission. I believe that political campaigns are not restricted by the "Do not call" list, so they can use this. I would think after the Guidaro fiasco from the last election (where a developer paid for a telephone campaign without telling anyone - even the candidates) Yes'ers would know that Davis is turned off by this method. I believe that they have a Sacramento company running their campaign. --["SharlaDaly"]

Measure X

SharlaDaly — 2005-11-03 06:11:20

Differences for Measure X

Deletions are marked with - .	Additions are marked with +.
Line 31:	Line 31:
	+ - And use a message from Ruth Asmundson? Your suggestion appears unlikely. - ["SharlaDaly"]

Measure X

MichaelGiardina — 2005-11-02 23:59:49

Comment added.

Differences for Measure X

Deletions are marked with - .	Additions are marked with +.
Line 33:	Line 33:
	+ ------ + ''2005-11-03 00:21:22'' [[nbsp]] there not using autodiliars, the university sells our phone numbers to whom evever wants it --["PattyAllen"] + ------ + ''2005-11-03 00:59:49'' [[nbsp]] That may be true, but the message I got was without a doubt recorded. Beyond that, everyone got the same message. Do you think a human being manually dialed every sold phone number and then hit a 'playback button' Let's just assume so, that's just an inneficient auto dialer.... Anyhow, this is the first spam or commercial call I ever got on my cell phone... Here's my bet, this will be a serious issue in 3 years... --["MichaelGiardina"]

Measure X

MichaelGiardina — 2005-11-02 23:22:38

Comment added.

Differences for Measure X

Deletions are marked with - .	Additions are marked with +.
Line 33:	Line 33:
- ------ - ''2005-11-03 00:21:22'' [[nbsp]] there not using autodiliars, the university sells our phone numbers to whom evever wants it --["PattyAllen"]

Measure X

PattyAllen — 2005-11-02 23:21:22

Comment added.

Differences for Measure X

Deletions are marked with - .	Additions are marked with +.
Line 31:	Line 31:
	+ ------ + ''2005-11-03 00:22:38'' [[nbsp]] Isn't it illegal to use auto dialers? --["MichaelGiardina"] + ------ + ''2005-11-03 00:21:22'' [[nbsp]] there not using autodiliars, the university sells our phone numbers to whom evever wants it --["PattyAllen"]

Measure X

ApolloStumpy — 2005-11-02 22:03:20

Comment added.

Differences for Measure X

Deletions are marked with - .	Additions are marked with +.
Line 29:	Line 29:
	+ ------ + ''2005-11-02 23:03:20'' [[nbsp]] it's possible the anti-x'ers are spamming to give the yes'ers a bad name. --["ApolloStumpy"]

Measure X

JackHaskel — 2005-11-02 16:06:48

Comment added.

Differences for Measure X

Deletions are marked with - .	Additions are marked with +.
Line 27:	Line 27:
	+ ------ + ''2005-11-02 17:06:48'' [[nbsp]] Yes, it's the 999 number. I got the call twice. It was a man's voice on the message but conveniently his name is garbled. Who was it? I want to call his house. --["JackHaskel"]

Measure X

JesseSingh — 2005-11-02 16:03:00

Comment added.

Differences for Measure X

Deletions are marked with - .	Additions are marked with +.
Line 25:	Line 25:
	+ ------ + ''2005-11-02 17:03:00'' [[nbsp]] My mistake! --["JesseSingh"]

Measure X

CraigBrozinsky — 2005-11-02 15:21:43

Comment added.

Differences for Measure X

Deletions are marked with - .	Additions are marked with +.
Line 23:	Line 23:
	+ ------ + ''2005-11-02 16:21:43'' [[nbsp]] Was that the 999-999-9999 number that called me earlier today? --["CraigBrozinsky"]

Measure X

PhilipNeustrom — 2005-11-02 15:21:40

Differences for Measure X

Deletions are marked with - .	Additions are marked with +.
Line 20:	Line 20:
- ------ - ''2005-11-02 15:59:11'' [[nbsp]] odd --["MichaelGiardina"]	+ ["Ruth Asmundson"] is the current mayor. + +

Measure X

MichaelGiardina — 2005-11-02 14:59:11

Comment added.

Differences for Measure X

Deletions are marked with - .	Additions are marked with +.
Line 20:	Line 20:
	+ ------ + ''2005-11-02 15:59:11'' [[nbsp]] odd --["MichaelGiardina"]

Measure X

JesseSingh — 2005-11-02 14:42:48

Comment added.

Differences for Measure X

Deletions are marked with - .	Additions are marked with +.
Line 18:	Line 18:
	+ ------ + ''2005-11-02 15:42:48'' [[nbsp]] Mayor pro term Greenwald is against Measure X, so perhaps someone else is doing the spamming. --["JesseSingh"]

Measure X

MichaelGiardina — 2005-11-02 14:08:36

Mayor spamming cell phones with YES on X?

Differences for Measure X

Deletions are marked with - .	Additions are marked with +.
Line 11:	Line 11:
	+ Apparently the Mayor (?) is using an automatic dialing system to spread a Yes on X message. Since when does the mayor get to spam my cell phone? +

Measure X

SammyBallard — 2005-11-02 12:28:32

Comment added.

Differences for Measure X

Deletions are marked with - .	Additions are marked with +.
Line 14:	Line 14:
	+ ------ + ''2005-11-02 13:28:32'' [[nbsp]] 55% Yes, 45% no --["SammyBallard"]

Measure X

RocksandDirt — 2005-10-31 17:32:22

Comment added.

Differences for Measure X

Deletions are marked with - .	Additions are marked with +.
Line 12:	Line 12:
	+ ------ + ''2005-10-31 18:32:22'' [[nbsp]] not quite on topic but, What do people think of the likelyhood of another lawsuit to stop CV if X passes? I would be surprized if the anit-growth people didn't try something. --["RocksandDirt"]

Measure X

SteveDavison — 2005-10-25 20:41:23

prediction link

Differences for Measure X

Deletions are marked with - .	Additions are marked with +.
Line 1:	Line 1:
- Measure X is on the ["November 2005 Yolo County Election"] ballot. It proposes altering the ["Davis General Plan"] to include ["Covell Village"].	+ Measure X is on the ["November 2005 Yolo County Election"] ballot. It proposes altering the ["Davis General Plan"] to include ["Covell Village"]. In other words, passage of Measure X is required for the creation of ["Covell Village"].
Line 3:	Line 3:
- from the Voter Information Pamphlet:	+ From the Voter Information Pamphlet:
Line 9:	Line 9:
	+ If you want you can ["Predict the Measure X Vote"]. +

Measure X

CarlMcCabe — 2005-10-08 19:57:45

minor

Differences for Measure X

Deletions are marked with - .	Additions are marked with +.
Line 1:	Line 1:
- Measure X is on the ["November 2005 Yolo County Election"] ballot. It proposed altering the ["Davis General Plan"] to include ["Covell Village"].	+ Measure X is on the ["November 2005 Yolo County Election"] ballot. It proposes altering the ["Davis General Plan"] to include ["Covell Village"].
Line 5:	Line 5:
- {{{Shall amended Resolution No. 05-96, ammending the Davis General Plan to change the land use designations for - the Covell Village property from agriculture to residential and commercial uses, as set forth in the Resolution and	+ {{{Shall amended Resolution No. 05-96, ammending the Davis General Plan to change the land use designations for + the Covell Village property from agriculture to residential and commercial uses, as set forth in the Resolution and

Measure X

PhilipNeustrom — 2005-10-08 19:47:25

Differences for Measure X

Deletions are marked with - .	Additions are marked with +.
Line 1:	Line 1:
- Measure X was on the ["November 2005 Yolo County Election"] ballot. It proposed altering the ["Davis General Plan"] to include ["Covell Village"].	+ Measure X is on the ["November 2005 Yolo County Election"] ballot. It proposed altering the ["Davis General Plan"] to include ["Covell Village"].

Measure X

AndrewChen — 2005-10-08 19:46:52

+Nov election

Differences for Measure X

Deletions are marked with - .	Additions are marked with +.
Line 1:	Line 1:
- Measure X was on the ballot in the Fall of 2005. It proposed altering the ["Davis General Plan"] to include ["Covell Village"].	+ Measure X was on the ["November 2005 Yolo County Election"] ballot. It proposed altering the ["Davis General Plan"] to include ["Covell Village"].

Measure X

JasonAller — 2005-10-06 14:58:35

Differences for Measure X

Deletions are marked with - .	Additions are marked with +.
Line 1:	Line 1:
	+ Measure X was on the ballot in the Fall of 2005. It proposed altering the ["Davis General Plan"] to include ["Covell Village"]. + + from the Voter Information Pamphlet: + + {{{Shall amended Resolution No. 05-96, ammending the Davis General Plan to change the land use designations for + the Covell Village property from agriculture to residential and commercial uses, as set forth in the Resolution and + establishing the Baseline Project Features for development of the Covell Village Project be approved?}}} + + [[Comments]]