Recent Changes for "Open Container Ordinance" - Davis Wikihttp://daviswiki.org/Open_Container_OrdinanceRecent Changes of the page "Open Container Ordinance" on Davis Wiki.en-us Open Container Ordinancehttp://daviswiki.org/Open_Container_Ordinance2014-03-24 19:49:26StevenDaubert(quick edit) <div id="content" class="wikipage content"> Differences for Open Container Ordinance<p><strong></strong></p><table> <tr> <td> <span> Deletions are marked with - . </span> </td> <td> <span> Additions are marked with +. </span> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> Line 16: </td> <td> Line 16: </td> </tr> <tr> <td> <span>-</span> The signs that were posted include the phrase '''"30 minutes before, during, and one hour after school or any school function"'''. How is one to know if a school function is going to start during the next thirty minutes if you are 500 feet away (as the crow flies) from a school? What qualifies as a school function? Does a play rehearsal on a Saturday count? </td> <td> <span>+</span> The signs that were posted include the phrase '''"30 minutes before, during, and one hour after school or any school function"'''. How is one to know if a school function is going to start during the next thirty minutes if you are 500 feet away (as the crow flies) from a school? What qualifies as a school function? <span>(anything with students &amp; faculty present)</span> Does a play rehearsal on a Saturday count<span>&nbsp;(yes)</span>? </td> </tr> </table> </div> Open Container Ordinancehttp://daviswiki.org/Open_Container_Ordinance2014-03-24 19:42:54DougWalternot 'this year' anymore <div id="content" class="wikipage content"> Differences for Open Container Ordinance<p><strong></strong></p><table> <tr> <td> <span> Deletions are marked with - . </span> </td> <td> <span> Additions are marked with +. </span> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> Line 8: </td> <td> Line 8: </td> </tr> <tr> <td> <span>-</span> Periodically, the City Council will agendize the Ordinance to get an update. Unfortunately, the item is scheduled for discussion during the month of June when UCD students are away for the summer. For example, the item appears on the City Council agenda for the June 27, 2006 meeting <span>this year </span>- 10 days after the end of the Spring quarter at UCD. </td> <td> <span>+</span> Periodically, the City Council will agendize the Ordinance to get an update. Unfortunately, the item is scheduled for discussion during the month of June when UCD students are away for the summer. For example, the item appears on the City Council agenda for the June 27, 2006 meeting - 10 days after the end of the Spring quarter at UCD. </td> </tr> </table> </div> Open Container Ordinancehttp://daviswiki.org/Open_Container_Ordinance2014-03-24 15:10:43EvanRothstein(quick edit) <div id="content" class="wikipage content"> Differences for Open Container Ordinance<p><strong></strong></p><table> <tr> <td> <span> Deletions are marked with - . </span> </td> <td> <span> Additions are marked with +. </span> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> Line 29: </td> <td> Line 29: </td> </tr> <tr> <td> <span>-</span> * --X["The Greenbelt"]X-- see [http://cityofdavis.org/<span>cm</span>o<span>/o</span>co<span>.</span>c<span>fm</span> city guide] </td> <td> <span>+</span> * --X["The Greenbelt"]X-- see [http://c<span>ommunity-services.c</span>ityofdavis.org/o<span>pen-</span>co<span>ntainer-ordinan</span>c<span>e</span> city guide] </td> </tr> </table> </div> Open Container Ordinancehttp://daviswiki.org/Open_Container_Ordinance2014-03-24 15:08:19EvanRothsteinFixed some link rot. <div id="content" class="wikipage content"> Differences for Open Container Ordinance<p><strong></strong></p><table> <tr> <td> <span> Deletions are marked with - . </span> </td> <td> <span> Additions are marked with +. </span> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> Line 12: </td> <td> Line 12: </td> </tr> <tr> <td> <span>-</span> The original ordinance included a 2 year sunset clause, which was added at the last minute by Councilman Mike Harrington in response to concerns that the ordinance would target unfairly UCD students and the homeless. Harrington felt that having the sunset clause would require the council to keep an eye on the effect of the ordinance and give the community a chance to weigh in on its use periodically. ["Mike Harrington"], who was not endorsed by ASUCD during the 2003 election, lost his bid for re-election in 2003. In 2004 the new Davis ["City Council"], which included ASUCD-endorsed councilmen, ["Don Saylor"] and ["Stephen Souza"], ever vigilant, reviewed the expiring bylaw and found that it had succeeded in reducing vandalism, violence, litter etc. They passed [http://<span>www</span>.<span>city</span>.<span>davis.ca.us/cmo/pdfs/Ord</span>21<span>59.pd</span>f ordinance 2159] renewing and revising the open container rule, but without the sunset clause. A user friendly guide to the result is published [http://<span>www</span>.city.<span>davis.ca.us</span>/<span>cmo/oco.cfm</span> here] (for instance, you are free to have a beer at the ["Farmers Market" farmer's market], as long as they remembered to apply for a permit that week). </td> <td> <span>+</span> The original ordinance included a 2 year sunset clause, which was added at the last minute by Councilman Mike Harrington in response to concerns that the ordinance would target unfairly UCD students and the homeless. Harrington felt that having the sunset clause would require the council to keep an eye on the effect of the ordinance and give the community a chance to weigh in on its use periodically. ["Mike Harrington"], who was not endorsed by ASUCD during the 2003 election, lost his bid for re-election in 2003. In 2004 the new Davis ["City Council"], which included ASUCD-endorsed councilmen, ["Don Saylor"] and ["Stephen Souza"], ever vigilant, reviewed the expiring bylaw and found that it had succeeded in reducing vandalism, violence, litter etc. They passed [http://<span>qcode</span>.<span>us/codes/davis/view</span>.<span>php?topic=</span>2<span>6-26_04&amp;showAll=</span>1<span>&amp;frames=of</span>f ordinance 2159] renewing and revising the open container rule, but without the sunset clause. A user friendly guide to the result is published [http://<span>community-services</span>.city<span>ofdavis</span>.<span>org</span>/<span>open-container-ordinance</span> here] (for instance, you are free to have a beer at the ["Farmers Market" farmer's market], as long as they remembered to apply for a permit that week). </td> </tr> <tr> <td> Line 21: </td> <td> Line 21: </td> </tr> <tr> <td> </td> <td> <span>+ [http://cityofdavis.org/media/default/documents/pdf/gis/maps/open%20container%20ordinance%20no.%202159.pdf More detailed map] also available.</span> </td> </tr> </table> </div> Open Container Ordinancehttp://daviswiki.org/Open_Container_Ordinance2012-09-15 13:42:23DanVillarrealAdded "Davis No Drinky Map" <div id="content" class="wikipage content"> Differences for Open Container Ordinance<p><strong></strong></p><table> <tr> <td> <span> Deletions are marked with - . </span> </td> <td> <span> Additions are marked with +. </span> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> Line 20: </td> <td> Line 20: </td> </tr> <tr> <td> </td> <td> <span>+ '''So I did a bit of research and came up with the [[File(Davis No Drinky Map.pdf)]]. I'm not a lawyer, and read the comments for full info -- ["Users/DanVillarreal"]'''</span> </td> </tr> </table> </div> Open Container Ordinancehttp://daviswiki.org/Open_Container_Ordinance2012-09-15 13:34:28DanVillarrealUpload of file <a href="http://daviswiki.org/Open_Container_Ordinance?action=Files&do=view&target=Davis%20No%20Drinky%20Map.pdf">Davis No Drinky Map.pdf</a>.Open Container Ordinancehttp://daviswiki.org/Open_Container_Ordinance2012-05-12 19:08:52ScottMeehleibMace Ranch within 600 feet of Korematsu <div id="content" class="wikipage content"> Differences for Open Container Ordinance<p><strong></strong></p><table> <tr> <td> <span> Deletions are marked with - . </span> </td> <td> <span> Additions are marked with +. </span> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> Line 29: </td> <td> Line 29: </td> </tr> <tr> <td> <span>-</span> * ["La Playa Park"] -- (La Play is within 600 feet of Harper and Korematsu schools so be sure to check for school functions)<br> <span>-</span> * ["Mace Ranch Park"] </td> <td> <span>+</span> * ["La Playa Park"] -- (La Play<span>a</span> is within 600 feet of Harper and Korematsu schools so be sure to check for school functions)<br> <span>+</span> * ["Mace Ranch Park"]<span>&nbsp;-- (Mace Ranch is within 600 feet of Korematsu so be sure to check for school functions)</span> </td> </tr> </table> </div> Open Container Ordinancehttp://daviswiki.org/Open_Container_Ordinance2012-05-12 18:39:27ericreed <div id="content" class="wikipage content"> Differences for Open Container Ordinance<p><strong></strong></p><table> <tr> <td> <span> Deletions are marked with - . </span> </td> <td> <span> Additions are marked with +. </span> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> Line 27: </td> <td> Line 27: </td> </tr> <tr> <td> <span>-</span> * --X["The Greenbelt"]X-- see [http://<span>www.</span>city<span>.</span>davis.<span>ca.us</span>/cmo/oco.cfm city guide] </td> <td> <span>+</span> * --X["The Greenbelt"]X-- see [http://city<span>of</span>davis.<span>org</span>/cmo/oco.cfm city guide] </td> </tr> </table> </div> Open Container Ordinancehttp://daviswiki.org/Open_Container_Ordinance2010-11-25 13:51:11ScottMeehleibwarning about La Playa park and clarification regarding the 600 feet rule <div id="content" class="wikipage content"> Differences for Open Container Ordinance<p><strong></strong></p><table> <tr> <td> <span> Deletions are marked with - . </span> </td> <td> <span> Additions are marked with +. </span> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> Line 14: </td> <td> Line 14: </td> </tr> <tr> <td> <span>-</span> Interestingly, article 26.04 does not completely forbid open containers in all public spaces. Rather, "you are allowed to have open containers of alcohol in parks and greenbelts that do not fall into one of the above categories". There are a lot of "above categories", for example the offlimiting of all areas within 600 feet of a public school. Some helpful maps of specific off limits areas are provided. Helpful maps of acceptable areas are not. </td> <td> <span>+</span> Interestingly, article 26.04 does not completely forbid open containers in all public spaces. Rather, "you are allowed to have open containers of alcohol in parks and greenbelts that do not fall into one of the above categories". There are a lot of "above categories", for example the offlimiting of all areas within 600 feet of a public school<span>&nbsp;during or near the times of school functions</span>. Some helpful maps of specific off limits areas are provided. Helpful maps of acceptable areas are not. </td> </tr> <tr> <td> Line 29: </td> <td> Line 29: </td> </tr> <tr> <td> <span>- * ["La Playa Park"]</span> </td> <td> <span>+ * ["La Playa Park"] -- (La Play is within 600 feet of Harper and Korematsu schools so be sure to check for school functions)</span> </td> </tr> </table> </div> Open Container Ordinancehttp://daviswiki.org/Open_Container_Ordinance2008-09-28 08:06:58JasonAllerlink fix <div id="content" class="wikipage content"> Differences for Open Container Ordinance<p><strong></strong></p><table> <tr> <td> <span> Deletions are marked with - . </span> </td> <td> <span> Additions are marked with +. </span> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> Line 23: </td> <td> Line 23: </td> </tr> <tr> <td> <span>-</span> '''Do not trust this to be correct. I take no liability if you get cited -- ["KenBloom"]''' </td> <td> <span>+</span> '''Do not trust this to be correct. I take no liability if you get cited -- ["<span>Users/</span>KenBloom"]''' </td> </tr> </table> </div> Open Container Ordinancehttp://daviswiki.org/Open_Container_Ordinance2008-07-26 23:34:24BrentLaabsRevert to version 23 (links don't expire, they just changed the site again. reminder to change later). <div id="content" class="wikipage content"> Differences for Open Container Ordinance<p><strong></strong></p><table> <tr> <td> <span> Deletions are marked with - . </span> </td> <td> <span> Additions are marked with +. </span> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> Line 47: </td> <td> Line 47: </td> </tr> <tr> <td> </td> <td> <span>+ = 2007 activity =</span> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> Line 48: </td> <td> Line 49: </td> </tr> <tr> <td> <span>- Moreover, some people who like to drink in parks think that Davis as a progressive and liberal town should be interested in protecting personal freedoms.</span> </td> <td> <span>+ * ["The California Aggie" Aggie] [http://media.www.californiaaggie.com/media/storage/paper981/news/2007/03/08/CityNews/City-Council.Looks.To.Ban.Alcohol.From.All.City.Parks.Recreation.Areas-2764513.shtml article]<br> + <br> + Moreover, Davis as a progressive and liberal town should be interested in protecting personal freedoms.</span> </td> </tr> </table> </div> Open Container Ordinancehttp://daviswiki.org/Open_Container_Ordinance2008-07-26 19:17:29DonShorNo point in linking to Aggie articles, the links expire <div id="content" class="wikipage content"> Differences for Open Container Ordinance<p><strong></strong></p><table> <tr> <td> <span> Deletions are marked with - . </span> </td> <td> <span> Additions are marked with +. </span> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> Line 47: </td> <td> Line 47: </td> </tr> <tr> <td> <span>- = 2007 activity =</span> </td> <td> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> Line 49: </td> <td> Line 48: </td> </tr> <tr> <td> <span>- * ["The California Aggie" Aggie] [http://media.www.californiaaggie.com/media/storage/paper981/news/2007/03/08/CityNews/City-Council.Looks.To.Ban.Alcohol.From.All.City.Parks.Recreation.Areas-2764513.shtml article]<br> - <br> - Moreover, Davis as a progressive and liberal town should be interested in protecting personal freedoms.</span> </td> <td> <span>+ Moreover, some people who like to drink in parks think that Davis as a progressive and liberal town should be interested in protecting personal freedoms.</span> </td> </tr> </table> </div> Open Container Ordinancehttp://daviswiki.org/Open_Container_Ordinance2008-07-26 13:41:32JeremyOgullinking to city page <div id="content" class="wikipage content"> Differences for Open Container Ordinance<p><strong></strong></p><table> <tr> <td> <span> Deletions are marked with - . </span> </td> <td> <span> Additions are marked with +. </span> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> Line 18: </td> <td> Line 18: </td> </tr> <tr> <td> <span>- Is there anyone out there with the time and will to interpret the new rules and create maps of places where Davisites can still enjoy a quiet Sierra Nevada in their public space?</span> </td> <td> <span>+ Is there anyone out there with the time and will to interpret the new rules and create maps of places where Davisites can still enjoy a quiet Sierra Nevada in their public space? If not, the city has [http://www.cityofdavis.org/cmo/oco.cfm a page] that includes maps of parks that are within the 600-ft. range of a school.</span> </td> </tr> </table> </div> Open Container Ordinancehttp://daviswiki.org/Open_Container_Ordinance2008-07-26 12:04:22JoshuaLee <div id="content" class="wikipage content"> Differences for Open Container Ordinance<p><strong></strong></p><table> <tr> <td> <span> Deletions are marked with - . </span> </td> <td> <span> Additions are marked with +. </span> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> Line 50: </td> <td> Line 50: </td> </tr> <tr> <td> </td> <td> <span>+ <br> + Moreover, Davis as a progressive and liberal town should be interested in protecting personal freedoms.</span> </td> </tr> </table> </div> Open Container Ordinancehttp://daviswiki.org/Open_Container_Ordinance2008-06-15 16:39:55KellanReaganAccording to the city guide linked to on this page, no drinking on greenbelt <div id="content" class="wikipage content"> Differences for Open Container Ordinance<p><strong></strong></p><table> <tr> <td> <span> Deletions are marked with - . </span> </td> <td> <span> Additions are marked with +. </span> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> Line 27: </td> <td> Line 27: </td> </tr> <tr> <td> <span>- * ["The Greenbelt"]</span> </td> <td> <span>+ * --X["The Greenbelt"]X-- see [http://www.city.davis.ca.us/cmo/oco.cfm city guide]</span> </td> </tr> </table> </div> Open Container Ordinancehttp://daviswiki.org/Open_Container_Ordinance2007-06-27 15:49:01JessicaRockwell(quick edit) <div id="content" class="wikipage content"> Differences for Open Container Ordinance<p><strong></strong></p><table> <tr> <td> <span> Deletions are marked with - . </span> </td> <td> <span> Additions are marked with +. </span> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> Line 12: </td> <td> Line 12: </td> </tr> <tr> <td> <span>-</span> The original ordinance included a 2 year sunset clause, which was added at the last minute by Councilman Mike Harrington in response to concerns that the ordinance would target unfairly UCD students and the homeless. Harrington felt that having the sunset clause would require th<span>at th</span>e council to keep an eye on <span>effect of</span> ordinance and give the community a chance to weigh in on its use periodically. ["Mike Harrington"], who was not endorsed by ASUCD during the 2003 election, lost his bid for re-election in 2003. In 2004 the new Davis ["City Council"], which included ASUCD-endorsed councilmen, ["Don Saylor"] and ["Stephen Souza"], ever vigilant, reviewed the expiring bylaw and found that it had succeeded in reducing vandalism, violence, litter etc. They passed [http://www.city.davis.ca.us/cmo/pdfs/Ord2159.pdf ordinance 2159] renewing and revising the open container rule, but without the sunset clause. A user friendly guide to the result is published [http://www.city.davis.ca.us/cmo/oco.cfm here] (for instance, you are free to have a beer at the ["Farmers Market" farmer's market], as long as they remembered to apply for a permit that week). </td> <td> <span>+</span> The original ordinance included a 2 year sunset clause, which was added at the last minute by Councilman Mike Harrington in response to concerns that the ordinance would target unfairly UCD students and the homeless. Harrington felt that having the sunset clause would require the council to keep an eye on <span>the effect of the</span> ordinance and give the community a chance to weigh in on its use periodically. ["Mike Harrington"], who was not endorsed by ASUCD during the 2003 election, lost his bid for re-election in 2003. In 2004 the new Davis ["City Council"], which included ASUCD-endorsed councilmen, ["Don Saylor"] and ["Stephen Souza"], ever vigilant, reviewed the expiring bylaw and found that it had succeeded in reducing vandalism, violence, litter etc. They passed [http://www.city.davis.ca.us/cmo/pdfs/Ord2159.pdf ordinance 2159] renewing and revising the open container rule, but without the sunset clause. A user friendly guide to the result is published [http://www.city.davis.ca.us/cmo/oco.cfm here] (for instance, you are free to have a beer at the ["Farmers Market" farmer's market], as long as they remembered to apply for a permit that week). </td> </tr> </table> </div> Open Container Ordinancehttp://daviswiki.org/Open_Container_Ordinance2007-06-01 19:08:20JasonAllerCommunity Park to be discussed Tuesday June 5th 2007 <div id="content" class="wikipage content"> Differences for Open Container Ordinance<p><strong></strong></p><table> <tr> <td> <span> Deletions are marked with - . </span> </td> <td> <span> Additions are marked with +. </span> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> Line 5: </td> <td> Line 5: </td> </tr> <tr> <td> </td> <td> <span>+ <br> + [[Image(Open_C_June_5_2007.JPG, right, thumbnail, 400, "example posting for an update to the ordinance")]]</span> </td> </tr> </table> </div> Open Container Ordinancehttp://daviswiki.org/Open_Container_Ordinance2007-06-01 19:06:19JasonAllerUpload of image <a href="http://daviswiki.org/Open_Container_Ordinance?action=Files&do=view&target=Open_C_June_5_2007.JPG">Open_C_June_5_2007.JPG</a>.Open Container Ordinancehttp://daviswiki.org/Open_Container_Ordinance2007-03-12 18:13:53JasonAlleradded link to source of data to update this page <div id="content" class="wikipage content"> Differences for Open Container Ordinance<p><strong></strong></p><table> <tr> <td> <span> Deletions are marked with - . </span> </td> <td> <span> Additions are marked with +. </span> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> Line 44: </td> <td> Line 44: </td> </tr> <tr> <td> </td> <td> <span>+ <br> + = 2007 activity =<br> + <br> + * ["The California Aggie" Aggie] [http://media.www.californiaaggie.com/media/storage/paper981/news/2007/03/08/CityNews/City-Council.Looks.To.Ban.Alcohol.From.All.City.Parks.Recreation.Areas-2764513.shtml article]</span> </td> </tr> </table> </div> Open Container Ordinancehttp://daviswiki.org/Open_Container_Ordinance2006-12-11 17:19:20MattJurachdeadline for survey has passed; removing link <div id="content" class="wikipage content"> Differences for Open Container Ordinance<p><strong></strong></p><table> <tr> <td> <span> Deletions are marked with - . </span> </td> <td> <span> Additions are marked with +. </span> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> Line 2: </td> <td> Line 2: </td> </tr> <tr> <td> <span>- <br> - '''The Open Container Ordinance discussed below will soon be re-examined by the Davis City Council, '' "in light of ongoing problems with the consumption of alcoholic beverages in public." '' ''' A subcommittee has been formed that will make a recomendation to the council, and they are asking for input from concerned citizens. You can take [http://www.cityofdavis.org/cmo/OCSurvey/ this online survey] to register your thought on this issue, and/or email the subcommittee at focus@cityofdavis.org . '''Surveys and comments should be submitted by Friday, October 20th.'''<br> - </span> </td> <td> </td> </tr> </table> </div> Open Container Ordinancehttp://daviswiki.org/Open_Container_Ordinance2006-12-11 15:40:18HughStimsonupdated TE Elliot link after old one went dark. <div id="content" class="wikipage content"> Differences for Open Container Ordinance<p><strong></strong></p><table> <tr> <td> <span> Deletions are marked with - . </span> </td> <td> <span> Additions are marked with +. </span> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> Line 11: </td> <td> Line 11: </td> </tr> <tr> <td> <span>-</span> T.E. Elliot may have had an [http://www.inte<span>rversity</span>.o<span>rg</span>/<span>lists/ncte-talk/archives/oct99/msg</span>00<span>35</span>1.html opinion]. </td> <td> <span>+</span> T.E. Elliot may have had an [http://www.in<span>s</span>te<span>adofablog</span>.<span>c</span>o<span>m</span>/<span>2</span>00<span>6.</span>1<span>0</span>.<span>28.s</span>html opinion]. </td> </tr> </table> </div> Open Container Ordinancehttp://daviswiki.org/Open_Container_Ordinance2006-10-10 22:25:30KenjiYamada+greenbelt per 26.04.020(a)1 <div id="content" class="wikipage content"> Differences for Open Container Ordinance<p><strong></strong></p><table> <tr> <td> <span> Deletions are marked with - . </span> </td> <td> <span> Additions are marked with +. </span> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> Line 28: </td> <td> Line 28: </td> </tr> <tr> <td> </td> <td> <span>+ * ["The Greenbelt"]</span> </td> </tr> </table> </div> Open Container Ordinancehttp://daviswiki.org/Open_Container_Ordinance2006-10-03 10:34:23MattJurachemail address for comments on the ordinance <div id="content" class="wikipage content"> Differences for Open Container Ordinance<p><strong></strong></p><table> <tr> <td> <span> Deletions are marked with - . </span> </td> <td> <span> Additions are marked with +. </span> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> Line 3: </td> <td> Line 3: </td> </tr> <tr> <td> <span>-</span> '''The Open Container Ordinance discussed below will soon be re-examined by the Davis City Council, '' "in light of ongoing problems with the consumption of alcoholic beverages in public." '' ''' A subcommittee has been formed that will make a recomendation to the council, and they are asking for input from concerned citizens. You can take [http://www.cityofdavis.org/cmo/OCSurvey/ this online survey] to register your thought on this issue. '''Surveys should be submitted by Friday, October 20th.''' </td> <td> <span>+</span> '''The Open Container Ordinance discussed below will soon be re-examined by the Davis City Council, '' "in light of ongoing problems with the consumption of alcoholic beverages in public." '' ''' A subcommittee has been formed that will make a recomendation to the council, and they are asking for input from concerned citizens. You can take [http://www.cityofdavis.org/cmo/OCSurvey/ this online survey] to register your thought on this issue<span>, and/or email the subcommittee at focus@cityofdavis.org </span>. '''Survey<span>s and comment</span>s should be submitted by Friday, October 20th.''' </td> </tr> </table> </div> Open Container Ordinancehttp://daviswiki.org/Open_Container_Ordinance2006-10-03 10:28:11MattJurachOpen Container Ordinance to be re-examined by city council! <div id="content" class="wikipage content"> Differences for Open Container Ordinance<p><strong></strong></p><table> <tr> <td> <span> Deletions are marked with - . </span> </td> <td> <span> Additions are marked with +. </span> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> Line 2: </td> <td> Line 2: </td> </tr> <tr> <td> </td> <td> <span>+ <br> + '''The Open Container Ordinance discussed below will soon be re-examined by the Davis City Council, '' "in light of ongoing problems with the consumption of alcoholic beverages in public." '' ''' A subcommittee has been formed that will make a recomendation to the council, and they are asking for input from concerned citizens. You can take [http://www.cityofdavis.org/cmo/OCSurvey/ this online survey] to register your thought on this issue. '''Surveys should be submitted by Friday, October 20th.'''</span> </td> </tr> </table> </div> Open Container Ordinancehttp://daviswiki.org/Open_Container_Ordinance2006-09-13 09:02:02SharlaDalyN Street park banned <div id="content" class="wikipage content"> Differences for Open Container Ordinance<p><strong></strong></p><table> <tr> <td> <span> Deletions are marked with - . </span> </td> <td> <span> Additions are marked with +. </span> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> Line 29: </td> <td> Line 29: </td> </tr> <tr> <td> <span>- * ["N Street Park"]</span> </td> <td> <span>+ * --X["N Street Park"]X-- banned by ["City Council"] Sept. 11, 2006</span> </td> </tr> </table> </div> Open Container Ordinancehttp://daviswiki.org/Open_Container_Ordinance2006-06-21 13:36:16SharlaDalyUpdate scheduled at 6/27/06 CC meeting <div id="content" class="wikipage content"> Differences for Open Container Ordinance<p><strong></strong></p><table> <tr> <td> <span> Deletions are marked with - . </span> </td> <td> <span> Additions are marked with +. </span> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> Line 7: </td> <td> Line 7: </td> </tr> <tr> <td> </td> <td> <span>+ Periodically, the City Council will agendize the Ordinance to get an update. Unfortunately, the item is scheduled for discussion during the month of June when UCD students are away for the summer. For example, the item appears on the City Council agenda for the June 27, 2006 meeting this year - 10 days after the end of the Spring quarter at UCD.<br> + </span> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> Line 9: </td> <td> Line 11: </td> </tr> <tr> <td> <span>-</span> The original ordinance included a 2 year sunset clause, which was added at the last minute by Councilman Mike Harrington in response to concerns that the ordinance would target unfairly UCD students and the homeless. Harrington felt that having the sunset clause would require that the council to keep an eye on effect of ordinance and give the community a chance to weigh in on its use periodically. ["Mike Harrington"], who was not endorsed by ASUCD during the 2003 election, lost his bid for re-election in 2003. In 2004 the new Davis ["City Council"], which included ASUCD-endorsed councilmen, ["Don Saylor"] and ["Stephen Souza"], ever vigilant, reviewed the expiring bylaw and found that it had succeeded in reducing vandalism, violence, litter etc. They passed [http://www.city.davis.ca.us/cmo/pdfs/Ord2159.pdf ordinance 2159] renewing and revising the open container rule, but without the sunset clause. A user friendly guide to the result is published [http://www.city.davis.ca.us/cmo/oco.cfm here] (for instance, you are free to have a beer at the ["Farmers Market" farmer's market], as long as they remembered to apply for a permit that week).<span>&nbsp;&nbsp;</span> </td> <td> <span>+</span> The original ordinance included a 2 year sunset clause, which was added at the last minute by Councilman Mike Harrington in response to concerns that the ordinance would target unfairly UCD students and the homeless. Harrington felt that having the sunset clause would require that the council to keep an eye on effect of ordinance and give the community a chance to weigh in on its use periodically. ["Mike Harrington"], who was not endorsed by ASUCD during the 2003 election, lost his bid for re-election in 2003. In 2004 the new Davis ["City Council"], which included ASUCD-endorsed councilmen, ["Don Saylor"] and ["Stephen Souza"], ever vigilant, reviewed the expiring bylaw and found that it had succeeded in reducing vandalism, violence, litter etc. They passed [http://www.city.davis.ca.us/cmo/pdfs/Ord2159.pdf ordinance 2159] renewing and revising the open container rule, but without the sunset clause. A user friendly guide to the result is published [http://www.city.davis.ca.us/cmo/oco.cfm here] (for instance, you are free to have a beer at the ["Farmers Market" farmer's market], as long as they remembered to apply for a permit that week). </td> </tr> <tr> <td> Line 34: </td> <td> Line 36: </td> </tr> <tr> <td> <span>-</span> * ["Manor Park or Slide Hill Park"]<span>&nbsp;</span> </td> <td> <span>+</span> * ["Manor Park or Slide Hill Park"] </td> </tr> </table> </div> Open Container Ordinancehttp://daviswiki.org/Open_Container_Ordinance2006-03-26 17:02:21JasonAller <div id="content" class="wikipage content"> Differences for Open Container Ordinance<p><strong></strong></p><table> <tr> <td> <span> Deletions are marked with - . </span> </td> <td> <span> Additions are marked with +. </span> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> Line 1: </td> <td> Line 1: </td> </tr> <tr> <td> <span>-</span> [[<span>Thu</span>m<span>bn</span>a<span>il</span>(open_container.JPG<span>, right</span>, "Sign posted on Alice Street")]] </td> <td> <span>+</span> [[<span>I</span>ma<span>ge</span>(open_container.JPG, "Sign posted on Alice Street"<span>, right, thumbnail</span>)]] </td> </tr> <tr> <td> Line 9: </td> <td> Line 9: </td> </tr> <tr> <td> <span>-</span> The original ordinance included a 2 year sunset clause, which was added at the last minute by Councilman Mike Harrington in response to concerns that the ordinance would target unfairly UCD students and the homeless. Harrington felt that having the sunset clause would require that the council to keep an eye on effect of ordinance and give the community a chance to weigh in on its use periodically. Mike Harrington, who was not endorsed by ASUCD during the 2003 election, lost his bid for re-election in 2003. In 2004 the new Davis ["City Council"], which included ASUCD-endorsed councilmen, Don Saylor<span>&nbsp;and </span>Stephen Sou<span>sa</span>, ever vigilant, reviewed the expiring bylaw and found that it had succeeded in reducing vandalism, violence, litter etc. They passed [http://www.city.davis.ca.us/cmo/pdfs/Ord2159.pdf ordinance 2159] renewing and revising the open container rule, but without the sunset clause. A user friendly guide to the result is published [http://www.city.davis.ca.us/cmo/oco.cfm here] (for instance, you are free to have a beer at the ["Farmers Market" farmer's market], as long as they remembered to apply for a permit that week). </td> <td> <span>+</span> The original ordinance included a 2 year sunset clause, which was added at the last minute by Councilman Mike Harrington in response to concerns that the ordinance would target unfairly UCD students and the homeless. Harrington felt that having the sunset clause would require that the council to keep an eye on effect of ordinance and give the community a chance to weigh in on its use periodically. <span>["</span>Mike Harrington<span>"]</span>, who was not endorsed by ASUCD during the 2003 election, lost his bid for re-election in 2003. In 2004 the new Davis ["City Council"], which included ASUCD-endorsed councilmen, <span>["</span>Don Saylor<span>"] and ["</span>Stephen Sou<span>za"]</span>, ever vigilant, reviewed the expiring bylaw and found that it had succeeded in reducing vandalism, violence, litter etc. They passed [http://www.city.davis.ca.us/cmo/pdfs/Ord2159.pdf ordinance 2159] renewing and revising the open container rule, but without the sunset clause. A user friendly guide to the result is published [http://www.city.davis.ca.us/cmo/oco.cfm here] (for instance, you are free to have a beer at the ["Farmers Market" farmer's market], as long as they remembered to apply for a permit that week). </td> </tr> </table> </div> Open Container Ordinancehttp://daviswiki.org/Open_Container_Ordinance2005-08-02 19:47:07ArlenAbrahaminternalized muni code link <div id="content" class="wikipage content"> Differences for Open Container Ordinance<p><strong></strong></p><table> <tr> <td> <span> Deletions are marked with - . </span> </td> <td> <span> Additions are marked with +. </span> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> Line 5: </td> <td> Line 5: </td> </tr> <tr> <td> <span>-</span> This pleasant, mature and dignified state came to an end when Davis ["City Council"], targeting "the problems associated with the consumption of alcoholic beverages in public, including vandalism, violence, litter, trespassing, graffiti and drug activity", passed ordinance 2084 on June 12 2002, while most students were away on summer break. The ordinance created Municipal Code [<span>http:</span>/<span>/www.city.davis.ca.us/cmo/citycode/chapter.cfm?chapter=</span>26 article 26].04, the "open container" article. There may or may not have been evidence offered to council that the article would have the intended anti-badness effect. It's unclear if anyone actually got off their ass and went to the relevant council meetings to find out, proving once again that the world is run by the people who show up. What is certain is that Davis police department had access to all the usual "drunk in public", trespassing, vandalism etc. laws needed to apprehend anyone actually abusing their public freedom before any new ordinance was passed. </td> <td> <span>+</span> This pleasant, mature and dignified state came to an end when Davis ["City Council"], targeting "the problems associated with the consumption of alcoholic beverages in public, including vandalism, violence, litter, trespassing, graffiti and drug activity", passed ordinance 2084 on June 12 2002, while most students were away on summer break. The ordinance created Municipal Code [<span>"Davis Municipal Code</span>/26<span>"</span> article 26].04, the "open container" article. There may or may not have been evidence offered to council that the article would have the intended anti-badness effect. It's unclear if anyone actually got off their ass and went to the relevant council meetings to find out, proving once again that the world is run by the people who show up. What is certain is that Davis police department had access to all the usual "drunk in public", trespassing, vandalism etc. laws needed to apprehend anyone actually abusing their public freedom before any new ordinance was passed. </td> </tr> </table> </div> Open Container Ordinancehttp://daviswiki.org/Open_Container_Ordinance2005-05-25 13:20:50PhilipNeustromdrinking banned in chestnut park by city council yesterday <div id="content" class="wikipage content"> Differences for Open Container Ordinance<p><strong></strong></p><table> <tr> <td> <span> Deletions are marked with - . </span> </td> <td> <span> Additions are marked with +. </span> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> Line 21: </td> <td> Line 21: </td> </tr> <tr> <td> <span>- * ["Chestnut Park"]</span> </td> <td> <span>+ * --X["Chestnut Park"]X-- banned by ["City Council"] May 24th, 2005.</span> </td> </tr> </table> </div> Open Container Ordinancehttp://daviswiki.org/Open_Container_Ordinance2005-04-21 14:45:46SummerSongmissing word <div id="content" class="wikipage content"> Differences for Open Container Ordinance<p><strong></strong></p><table> <tr> <td> <span> Deletions are marked with - . </span> </td> <td> <span> Additions are marked with +. </span> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> Line 18: </td> <td> Line 18: </td> </tr> <tr> <td> <span>-</span> = Parks that appear allow open containers = </td> <td> <span>+</span> = Parks that appear<span>&nbsp;to</span> allow open containers = </td> </tr> </table> </div> Open Container Ordinancehttp://daviswiki.org/Open_Container_Ordinance2005-04-21 10:23:44SharlaDalyAdded a bit of history re: Mike Harrington & sunset clause <div id="content" class="wikipage content"> Differences for Open Container Ordinance<p><strong></strong></p><table> <tr> <td> <span> Deletions are marked with - . </span> </td> <td> <span> Additions are marked with +. </span> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> Line 9: </td> <td> Line 9: </td> </tr> <tr> <td> -<span>&nbsp;The original ordinance included a</span> 2<span>&nbsp;year sunset clause</span>. In 2004 Davis ["City Council"], ever vigilant, reviewed the expiring bylaw and found that it had succeeded in reducing vandalism, violence, litter etc. <span>&nbsp;Again, it is unknown to the author what evidence was available to support or refute this conclusion.</span> They passed [http://www.city.davis.ca.us/cmo/pdfs/Ord2159.pdf ordinance 2159] renewing and revising the open container rule. A user friendly guide to the result is published [http://www.city.davis.ca.us/cmo/oco.cfm here] (for instance, you are free to have a beer at the ["Farmers Market" farmer's market], as long as they remembered to apply for a permit that week). </td> <td> <span>+ The original ordinance included a 2 year sunset clause, which was added at the last minute by Councilman Mike Harrington in response to concerns that the ordinance would target unfairly UCD students and the homeless. Harrington felt that having the sunset clause would require that the council to keep an eye on effect of ordinance and give the community a chance to weigh in on its use periodically. Mike Harrington, who was not endorsed by ASUCD during the 2003 election, lost his bid for re</span>-<span>election in</span> 2<span>003</span>. In 2004 <span>the new </span>Davis ["City Council"], <span>which included ASUCD-endorsed councilmen, Don Saylor and Stephen Sousa, </span>ever vigilant, reviewed the expiring bylaw and found that it had succeeded in reducing vandalism, violence, litter etc. They passed [http://www.city.davis.ca.us/cmo/pdfs/Ord2159.pdf ordinance 2159] renewing and revising the open container rule<span>, but without the sunset clause</span>. A user friendly guide to the result is published [http://www.city.davis.ca.us/cmo/oco.cfm here] (for instance, you are free to have a beer at the ["Farmers Market" farmer's market], as long as they remembered to apply for a permit that week). </td> </tr> </table> </div> Open Container Ordinancehttp://daviswiki.org/Open_Container_Ordinance2005-04-20 18:25:36JasonAlleradded picture of sign and questions about vagueness of the law <div id="content" class="wikipage content"> Differences for Open Container Ordinance<p><strong></strong></p><table> <tr> <td> <span> Deletions are marked with - . </span> </td> <td> <span> Additions are marked with +. </span> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> Line 1: </td> <td> Line 1: </td> </tr> <tr> <td> </td> <td> <span>+ [[Thumbnail(open_container.JPG, right, "Sign posted on Alice Street")]]<br> + </span> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> Line 10: </td> <td> Line 12: </td> </tr> <tr> <td> </td> <td> <span>+ <br> + The signs that were posted include the phrase '''"30 minutes before, during, and one hour after school or any school function"'''. How is one to know if a school function is going to start during the next thirty minutes if you are 500 feet away (as the crow flies) from a school? What qualifies as a school function? Does a play rehearsal on a Saturday count?</span> </td> </tr> </table> </div> Open Container Ordinancehttp://daviswiki.org/Open_Container_Ordinance2005-04-20 18:15:41JasonAllerUpload of image <a href="http://daviswiki.org/Open_Container_Ordinance?action=Files&do=view&target=open_container.JPG">open_container.JPG</a>.Open Container Ordinancehttp://daviswiki.org/Open_Container_Ordinance2005-01-23 22:44:24JackHaskelgreat job ken <div id="content" class="wikipage content"> Differences for Open Container Ordinance<p><strong></strong></p><table> <tr> <td> <span> Deletions are marked with - . </span> </td> <td> <span> Additions are marked with +. </span> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> Line 14: </td> <td> Line 14: </td> </tr> <tr> <td> <span>-</span> Parks that appear allow open containers<span>:</span> </td> <td> <span>+ =</span> Parks that appear allow open containers<span>&nbsp;=<br> + </span> </td> </tr> </table> </div> Open Container Ordinancehttp://daviswiki.org/Open_Container_Ordinance2005-01-23 16:07:45KenBloomcomputed which parks appear to allow open containers <div id="content" class="wikipage content"> Differences for Open Container Ordinance<p><strong></strong></p><table> <tr> <td> <span> Deletions are marked with - . </span> </td> <td> <span> Additions are marked with +. </span> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> Line 13: </td> <td> Line 13: </td> </tr> <tr> <td> </td> <td> <span>+ <br> + Parks that appear allow open containers:<br> + '''Do not trust this to be correct. I take no liability if you get cited -- ["KenBloom"]'''<br> + * ["Chestnut Park"]<br> + * ["College Park"]<br> + * ["Covell Park"]<br> + * ["Hacienda Park"]<br> + * ["La Playa Park"]<br> + * ["Mace Ranch Park"]<br> + * ["N Street Park"]<br> + * ["Northstar Park"]<br> + * ["Oak Grove Park"]<br> + * ["Playfields Park"]<br> + * ["Putah Creek Park"]<br> + * ["Robert Arneson Park"]<br> + * ["Sandy Motley Park"]<br> + * ["Manor Park or Slide Hill Park"] <br> + * ["Village Park"]<br> + * ["West Manor Park"]<br> + * ["Whaleback Park"]<br> + * ["Willowcreek Park"]<br> + * ["Davis Community Garden"]<br> + <br> + This may be a conservative estimate. (Some parks not listed may have very remote reaches that allow open containers).</span> </td> </tr> </table> </div> Open Container Ordinancehttp://daviswiki.org/Open_Container_Ordinance2005-01-23 15:26:08ArlenAbrahamcity council <div id="content" class="wikipage content"> Differences for Open Container Ordinance<p><strong></strong></p><table> <tr> <td> <span> Deletions are marked with - . </span> </td> <td> <span> Additions are marked with +. </span> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> Line 3: </td> <td> Line 3: </td> </tr> <tr> <td> <span>-</span> This pleasant, mature and dignified state came to an end when Davis <span>city council</span>, targeting "the problems associated with the consumption of alcoholic beverages in public, including vandalism, violence, litter, trespassing, graffiti and drug activity", passed ordinance 2084 on June 12 2002, while most students were away on summer break. The ordinance created Municipal Code [http://www.city.davis.ca.us/cmo/citycode/chapter.cfm?chapter=26 article 26].04, the "open container" article. There may or may not have been evidence offered to council that the article would have the intended anti-badness effect. It's unclear if anyone actually got off their ass and went to the relevant council meetings to find out, proving once again that the world is run by the people who show up. What is certain is that Davis police department had access to all the usual "drunk in public", trespassing, vandalism etc. laws needed to apprehend anyone actually abusing their public freedom before any new ordinance was passed. </td> <td> <span>+</span> This pleasant, mature and dignified state came to an end when Davis <span>["City Council"]</span>, targeting "the problems associated with the consumption of alcoholic beverages in public, including vandalism, violence, litter, trespassing, graffiti and drug activity", passed ordinance 2084 on June 12 2002, while most students were away on summer break. The ordinance created Municipal Code [http://www.city.davis.ca.us/cmo/citycode/chapter.cfm?chapter=26 article 26].04, the "open container" article. There may or may not have been evidence offered to council that the article would have the intended anti-badness effect. It's unclear if anyone actually got off their ass and went to the relevant council meetings to find out, proving once again that the world is run by the people who show up. What is certain is that Davis police department had access to all the usual "drunk in public", trespassing, vandalism etc. laws needed to apprehend anyone actually abusing their public freedom before any new ordinance was passed. </td> </tr> <tr> <td> Line 7: </td> <td> Line 7: </td> </tr> <tr> <td> <span>-</span> The original ordinance included a 2 year sunset clause. In 2004 Davis <span>city council</span>, ever vigilant, reviewed the expiring bylaw and found that it had succeeded in reducing vandalism, violence, litter etc. Again, it is unknown to the author what evidence was available to support or refute this conclusion. They passed [http://www.city.davis.ca.us/cmo/pdfs/Ord2159.pdf ordinance 2159] renewing and revising the open container rule. A user friendly guide to the result is published [http://www.city.davis.ca.us/cmo/oco.cfm here] (for instance, you are free to have a beer at the ["Farmers Market" farmer's market], as long as they remembered to apply for a permit that week). </td> <td> <span>+</span> The original ordinance included a 2 year sunset clause. In 2004 Davis <span>["City Council"]</span>, ever vigilant, reviewed the expiring bylaw and found that it had succeeded in reducing vandalism, violence, litter etc. Again, it is unknown to the author what evidence was available to support or refute this conclusion. They passed [http://www.city.davis.ca.us/cmo/pdfs/Ord2159.pdf ordinance 2159] renewing and revising the open container rule. A user friendly guide to the result is published [http://www.city.davis.ca.us/cmo/oco.cfm here] (for instance, you are free to have a beer at the ["Farmers Market" farmer's market], as long as they remembered to apply for a permit that week). </td> </tr> </table> </div> Open Container Ordinancehttp://daviswiki.org/Open_Container_Ordinance2005-01-12 07:15:34HughStimson <div id="content" class="wikipage content"> Differences for Open Container Ordinance<p><strong></strong></p><table> <tr> <td> <span> Deletions are marked with - . </span> </td> <td> <span> Additions are marked with +. </span> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> Line 1: </td> <td> Line 1: </td> </tr> <tr> <td> </td> <td> <span>+ If, like most people, you grew up in a community with an open container ordinance, you probably grew up assuming that drinking in public was illegal by default. If you moved to Davis before summer 2002, you may have experienced the pleasant sensation of having that assumption fixed. Lacking such an ordinance, Davisites were free to carry open beverages willy nilly along their sidewalks parks and streets, supping them with a relaxed and civilized air.<br> + <br> + This pleasant, mature and dignified state came to an end when Davis city council, targeting "the problems associated with the consumption of alcoholic beverages in public, including vandalism, violence, litter, trespassing, graffiti and drug activity", passed ordinance 2084 on June 12 2002, while most students were away on summer break. The ordinance created Municipal Code [http://www.city.davis.ca.us/cmo/citycode/chapter.cfm?chapter=26 article 26].04, the "open container" article. There may or may not have been evidence offered to council that the article would have the intended anti-badness effect. It's unclear if anyone actually got off their ass and went to the relevant council meetings to find out, proving once again that the world is run by the people who show up. What is certain is that Davis police department had access to all the usual "drunk in public", trespassing, vandalism etc. laws needed to apprehend anyone actually abusing their public freedom before any new ordinance was passed.<br> + <br> + T.E. Elliot may have had an [http://www.interversity.org/lists/ncte-talk/archives/oct99/msg00351.html opinion].<br> + <br> + The original ordinance included a 2 year sunset clause. In 2004 Davis city council, ever vigilant, reviewed the expiring bylaw and found that it had succeeded in reducing vandalism, violence, litter etc. Again, it is unknown to the author what evidence was available to support or refute this conclusion. They passed [http://www.city.davis.ca.us/cmo/pdfs/Ord2159.pdf ordinance 2159] renewing and revising the open container rule. A user friendly guide to the result is published [http://www.city.davis.ca.us/cmo/oco.cfm here] (for instance, you are free to have a beer at the ["Farmers Market" farmer's market], as long as they remembered to apply for a permit that week). <br> + <br> + Interestingly, article 26.04 does not completely forbid open containers in all public spaces. Rather, "you are allowed to have open containers of alcohol in parks and greenbelts that do not fall into one of the above categories". There are a lot of "above categories", for example the offlimiting of all areas within 600 feet of a public school. Some helpful maps of specific off limits areas are provided. Helpful maps of acceptable areas are not.<br> + <br> + Is there anyone out there with the time and will to interpret the new rules and create maps of places where Davisites can still enjoy a quiet Sierra Nevada in their public space?<br> + </span> </td> </tr> </table> </div>