http://daviswiki.org/Peter_HamiltonRecent Changes of the page "Peter Hamilton" on Davis Wiki.en-us http://daviswiki.org/Peter_Hamilton2008-05-28 18:54:46AndrewPeakeRevert to version 41 (ps2 removed negative info from Peter/Talia...seems to be yearly tradition). <div id="content" class="wikipage content"> Differences for Peter Hamilton<p><strong></strong></p><table> <tr> <td> <span> Deletions are marked with - . </span> </td> <td> <span> Additions are marked with +. </span> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> Line 1: </td> <td> Line 1: </td> </tr> <tr> <td> <span>-</span> '''Peter Hamilton'''<span>&nbsp;majored in genetics at UC Davis and graduated in 2007. He</span> served as the editor in chief of ["The California Aggie"] for the 2006-2007 school year. He previously served as the science and technology editor in 2005-2006, and as a science and technology reporter for two years prior to that. </td> <td> <span>+</span> '''Peter Hamilton''' served as the editor in chief of ["The California Aggie"] for the 2006-2007 school year. He previously served as the science and technology editor in 2005-2006, and as a science and technology reporter for two years prior to that. </td> </tr> <tr> <td> Line 3: </td> <td> Line 3: </td> </tr> <tr> <td> <span>- ====While at UC Davis====</span> </td> <td> <span>+ On May 15, 2007, 31 Aggie staff members, including five of the nine editorial board members, asked Peter Hamilton and ["Talia Kennedy"], the campus news editor, to resign. In a letter presented publicly at a Campus Media Board meeting, the members expressed the reasons they felt warranted his resignation, including poor leadership, inadequate training of the incoming editor in chief, unnecessary expenses incurred while attending the 2007 California College Media Association awards banquet, the fostering of what they called a "divisive and unprofessional" atmosphere, and the detrimental effects of a "secretive relationship" he allegedly had with the campus editor. Peter and the campus editor responded to this letter with their ["The California Aggie Controversies/Reply to Hamilton letter" own letter], stating that the expenses were justified and chastising the signatories of the original letter for their lack of professionalism and their desire to "publicly humiliate us — and our institution — at [the] Campus Media Board meeting by dragging internal personal issues into the public."</span> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> Line 5: </td> <td> Line 5: </td> </tr> <tr> <td> <span>- In May 2007, 31 Aggie staff members asked Hamilton and ["Talia Kennedy"], the campus news editor, to resign in a ["The California Aggie Controversies/Hamilton letter" letter] presented at a Campus Media Board meeting; the reasons including perceived poor leadership, spending and employee relations. Peter and the campus editor responded with their ["The California Aggie Controversies/Reply to Hamilton letter" own letter], denying the claims, and asked for the 31 signers of the first letter to resign. At the time the first letter was presented, there were only 15 days left in his term as chief. See ["The California Aggie Controversies"] for more information.</span> </td> <td> <span>+ At the time the letter was presented, there were only 15 days left in his term as chief. See ["The California Aggie Controversies"] for more information.</span> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> Line 7: </td> <td> Line 7: </td> </tr> <tr> <td> <span>- At the close of the 2006-2007 school year, The Aggie faced another consecutive year of deficit -- this time approaching $120,000 -- under his leadership. The two Aggie staff members responsible for overseeing The Aggie's finances at the time were business manager Mia Szmuch and advertising manager Christina Chin, who was responsible for the newspaper's lack of advertising sales. Some felt Hamilton failed to consult with Szmuch about the budget and that he should take the blame for the budget deficit, though it had been building for several years. Others took issue with his proposed budget, which, among $40,000 in cuts, cut a $30,000 staff position, which was then held by a recent UC Davis graduate. Hamilton's budget was rejected and a new one, with a different set of $70,000 in cuts, was made. It should be noted that when the recent grad who had been holding the staff position quit in late 2007, she was not replaced, so Hamilton's original budget seems to have been implemented anyway.</span> </td> <td> <span>+ At the close of the 2006-2007 school year, The Aggie faced another consecutive year of deficit -- this time approaching $120,000 -- under his leadership. The two Aggie staff members responsible for overseeing The Aggie's finances at the time were business manager Mia Szmuch and advertising manager Christina Chin, who was responsible for the newspaper's lack of advertising sales. Of course the buck stops with the Editor-in-Chief, and Peter overruled, ignored, or failed to consult Mia on a few known occassions. Peter even submitted a FY2007-2008 Aggie Budget without involving Mia substantially; his solution to the towering deficit was to be eliminating career staff, a move Mia, the Campus Media Board, and ASUCD General Administration opposed, eliminating two members of the Editorial Board, and cutting pay for photographers. This proposal, by informed estimates, would have actually had a negative impact on the Aggie because cutting the career staff would probably cripple the Aggie's administrative functions (if not in the short run then in the long run) which would hurt the advertising department the most. In the end, a solid budget was drafted with Mia's consultation that could eliminate up to $70,000 of the deficit. The deficit won't disappear this year, of course, but it "slows the bleeding," buys the Media Board and the Aggie leadership time to come up with a more complete solution, and keeps the ["Mark Champagne" ASUCD General Administration"] from repeating its last managerial intervention in the late 1970's.</span> </td> </tr> </table> </div> http://daviswiki.org/Peter_Hamilton2008-05-28 18:18:45PhilipNeustromaggie staff "include" was removed <div id="content" class="wikipage content"> Differences for Peter Hamilton<p><strong></strong></p><table> <tr> <td> <span> Deletions are marked with - . </span> </td> <td> <span> Additions are marked with +. </span> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> Line 8: </td> <td> Line 8: </td> </tr> <tr> <td> </td> <td> <span>+ <br> + [[Include(The California Aggie/2006-2007 Staff)]]</span> </td> </tr> </table> </div> http://daviswiki.org/Peter_Hamilton2008-05-28 17:59:22PS2tried to clean it up. sigh. <div id="content" class="wikipage content"> Differences for Peter Hamilton<p><strong></strong></p><table> <tr> <td> <span> Deletions are marked with - . </span> </td> <td> <span> Additions are marked with +. </span> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> Line 1: </td> <td> Line 1: </td> </tr> <tr> <td> <span>-</span> '''Peter Hamilton''' served as the editor in chief of ["The California Aggie"] for the 2006-2007 school year. He previously served as the science and technology editor in 2005-2006, and as a science and technology reporter for two years prior to that. </td> <td> <span>+</span> '''Peter Hamilton'''<span>&nbsp;majored in genetics at UC Davis and graduated in 2007. He</span> served as the editor in chief of ["The California Aggie"] for the 2006-2007 school year. He previously served as the science and technology editor in 2005-2006, and as a science and technology reporter for two years prior to that. </td> </tr> <tr> <td> Line 3: </td> <td> Line 3: </td> </tr> <tr> <td> <span>- On May 15, 2007, 31 Aggie staff members, including five of the nine editorial board members, asked Peter Hamilton and ["Talia Kennedy"], the campus news editor, to resign. In a letter presented publicly at a Campus Media Board meeting, the members expressed the reasons they felt warranted his resignation, including poor leadership, inadequate training of the incoming editor in chief, unnecessary expenses incurred while attending the 2007 California College Media Association awards banquet, the fostering of what they called a "divisive and unprofessional" atmosphere, and the detrimental effects of a "secretive relationship" he allegedly had with the campus editor. Peter and the campus editor responded to this letter with their ["The California Aggie Controversies/Reply to Hamilton letter" own letter], stating that the expenses were justified and chastising the signatories of the original letter for their lack of professionalism and their desire to "publicly humiliate us — and our institution — at [the] Campus Media Board meeting by dragging internal personal issues into the public."</span> </td> <td> <span>+ ====While at UC Davis====</span> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> Line 5: </td> <td> Line 5: </td> </tr> <tr> <td> <span>- At the time the letter was presented, there were only 15 days left in his term as chief. See ["The California Aggie Controversies"] for more information.</span> </td> <td> <span>+ In May 2007, 31 Aggie staff members asked Hamilton and ["Talia Kennedy"], the campus news editor, to resign in a ["The California Aggie Controversies/Hamilton letter" letter] presented at a Campus Media Board meeting; the reasons including perceived poor leadership, spending and employee relations. Peter and the campus editor responded with their ["The California Aggie Controversies/Reply to Hamilton letter" own letter], denying the claims, and asked for the 31 signers of the first letter to resign. At the time the first letter was presented, there were only 15 days left in his term as chief. See ["The California Aggie Controversies"] for more information.</span> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> Line 7: </td> <td> Line 7: </td> </tr> <tr> <td> <span>- At the close of the 2006-2007 school year, The Aggie faced another consecutive year of deficit -- this time approaching $120,000 -- under his leadership. The two Aggie staff members responsible for overseeing The Aggie's finances at the time were business manager Mia Szmuch and advertising manager Christina Chin, who was responsible for the newspaper's lack of advertising sales. Of course the buck stops with the Editor-in-Chief, and Peter overruled, ignored, or failed to consult Mia on a few known occassions. Peter even submitted a FY2007-2008 Aggie Budget without involving Mia substantially; his solution to the towering deficit was to be eliminating career staff, a move Mia, the Campus Media Board, and ASUCD General Administration opposed, eliminating two members of the Editorial Board, and cutting pay for photographers. This proposal, by informed estimates, would have actually had a negative impact on the Aggie because cutting the career staff would probably cripple the Aggie's administrative functions (if not in the short run then in the long run) which would hurt the advertising department the most. In the end, a solid budget was drafted with Mia's consultation that could eliminate up to $70,000 of the deficit. The deficit won't disappear this year, of course, but it "slows the bleeding," buys the Media Board and the Aggie leadership time to come up with a more complete solution, and keeps the ["Mark Champagne" ASUCD General Administration"] from repeating its last managerial intervention in the late 1970's.<br> - <br> - [[Include(The California Aggie/2006-2007 Staff)]]</span> </td> <td> <span>+ At the close of the 2006-2007 school year, The Aggie faced another consecutive year of deficit -- this time approaching $120,000 -- under his leadership. The two Aggie staff members responsible for overseeing The Aggie's finances at the time were business manager Mia Szmuch and advertising manager Christina Chin, who was responsible for the newspaper's lack of advertising sales. Some felt Hamilton failed to consult with Szmuch about the budget and that he should take the blame for the budget deficit, though it had been building for several years. Others took issue with his proposed budget, which, among $40,000 in cuts, cut a $30,000 staff position, which was then held by a recent UC Davis graduate. Hamilton's budget was rejected and a new one, with a different set of $70,000 in cuts, was made. It should be noted that when the recent grad who had been holding the staff position quit in late 2007, she was not replaced, so Hamilton's original budget seems to have been implemented anyway.</span> </td> </tr> </table> </div> http://daviswiki.org/Peter_Hamilton2007-08-17 17:09:02PaulHarms <div id="content" class="wikipage content"> Differences for Peter Hamilton<p><strong></strong></p><table> <tr> <td> <span> Deletions are marked with - . </span> </td> <td> <span> Additions are marked with +. </span> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> Line 7: </td> <td> Line 7: </td> </tr> <tr> <td> <span>-</span> At the close of the 2006-2007 school year, The Aggie faced another consecutive year of deficit -- this time approaching $120,000 -- under his leadership. The two Aggie staff members responsible for overseeing The Aggie's finances at the time were business manager Mia Szmuch and advertising manager Christina Chin, who was responsible for the newspaper's lack of advertising sales. Of course the buck stops with the Editor-in-Chief, and Peter overruled, ignored, or failed to consult Mia on a few known occassions. Peter even submitted a FY2007-2008 Aggie Budget without involving Mia substantially; his solution to the towering deficit was to be eliminating career staff, a move Mia, the Campus Media Board, and ASUCD General Administration opposed, eliminating two members of the Editorial Board, and cutting pay for photographers. This proposal, by informed estimates, would have actually had a negative impact on the Aggie because cutting the career staff would probably cripple the Aggie's administrative functions (if not in the short run then in the long run) which would hurt the advertising department the most. In the end, a solid budget was drafted with Mia's consultation that could eliminate up to $70,000 of the deficit. The deficit won't disappear this year, of course, but it "slows the bleeding," buys the Media Board and the Aggie leadership time to come up with a more complete solution, and keeps the ASUCD General Administration from repeating its last managerial intervention in the late 1970's. </td> <td> <span>+</span> At the close of the 2006-2007 school year, The Aggie faced another consecutive year of deficit -- this time approaching $120,000 -- under his leadership. The two Aggie staff members responsible for overseeing The Aggie's finances at the time were business manager Mia Szmuch and advertising manager Christina Chin, who was responsible for the newspaper's lack of advertising sales. Of course the buck stops with the Editor-in-Chief, and Peter overruled, ignored, or failed to consult Mia on a few known occassions. Peter even submitted a FY2007-2008 Aggie Budget without involving Mia substantially; his solution to the towering deficit was to be eliminating career staff, a move Mia, the Campus Media Board, and ASUCD General Administration opposed, eliminating two members of the Editorial Board, and cutting pay for photographers. This proposal, by informed estimates, would have actually had a negative impact on the Aggie because cutting the career staff would probably cripple the Aggie's administrative functions (if not in the short run then in the long run) which would hurt the advertising department the most. In the end, a solid budget was drafted with Mia's consultation that could eliminate up to $70,000 of the deficit. The deficit won't disappear this year, of course, but it "slows the bleeding," buys the Media Board and the Aggie leadership time to come up with a more complete solution, and keeps the <span>["Mark Champagne" </span>ASUCD General Administration<span>"]</span> from repeating its last managerial intervention in the late 1970's. </td> </tr> </table> </div> http://daviswiki.org/Peter_Hamilton2007-08-17 17:00:07PaulHarms <div id="content" class="wikipage content"> Differences for Peter Hamilton<p><strong></strong></p><table> <tr> <td> <span> Deletions are marked with - . </span> </td> <td> <span> Additions are marked with +. </span> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> Line 7: </td> <td> Line 7: </td> </tr> <tr> <td> <span>-</span> At the close of the 2006-2007 school year, The Aggie faced another consecutive year of deficit -- this time approaching $120,000 -- under his leadership. The two Aggie staff members responsible for overseeing The Aggie's finances at the time were business manager Mia Szmuch and advertising manager Christina Chin, who was responsible for the newspaper's lack of advertising sales. Of course the buck stops with the Editor-in-Chief, and Peter overruled, ignored, or failed to consult Mia on a few known occassions. Peter even submitted a FY2007-2008 Aggie Budget without involving Mia substantially; his solution to the towering deficit was to be eliminating career staff, a move Mia, the Campus Media Board, and ASUCD General Administration opposed, eliminating two members of the Editorial Board, and cutting pay for photographers. This proposal, by informed estimates, would have actually had a negative impact on the Aggie because cutting the career staff would probably cripple the Aggie's administrative functions (if not in the short run then in the long run) which would hurt the advertising department the most. In the end, a solid budget was drafted with Mia's consultation that could eliminate up to $70,000 of the deficit. The deficit won't disappear this year, of course, but it "slows the bleeding" <span>and </span>buys the Media Board and the Aggie leadership time to come up with a more complete solution. </td> <td> <span>+</span> At the close of the 2006-2007 school year, The Aggie faced another consecutive year of deficit -- this time approaching $120,000 -- under his leadership. The two Aggie staff members responsible for overseeing The Aggie's finances at the time were business manager Mia Szmuch and advertising manager Christina Chin, who was responsible for the newspaper's lack of advertising sales. Of course the buck stops with the Editor-in-Chief, and Peter overruled, ignored, or failed to consult Mia on a few known occassions. Peter even submitted a FY2007-2008 Aggie Budget without involving Mia substantially; his solution to the towering deficit was to be eliminating career staff, a move Mia, the Campus Media Board, and ASUCD General Administration opposed, eliminating two members of the Editorial Board, and cutting pay for photographers. This proposal, by informed estimates, would have actually had a negative impact on the Aggie because cutting the career staff would probably cripple the Aggie's administrative functions (if not in the short run then in the long run) which would hurt the advertising department the most. In the end, a solid budget was drafted with Mia's consultation that could eliminate up to $70,000 of the deficit. The deficit won't disappear this year, of course, but it "slows the bleeding<span>,</span>" buys the Media Board and the Aggie leadership time to come up with a more complete solution<span>, and keeps the ASUCD General Administration from repeating its last managerial intervention in the late 1970's</span>. </td> </tr> </table> </div> http://daviswiki.org/Peter_Hamilton2007-08-17 13:01:03KarlMogelRevert to version 37 (The Chief is ultimately responsible for the paper. Not a matter of opinion.). <div id="content" class="wikipage content"> Differences for Peter Hamilton<p><strong></strong></p><table> <tr> <td> <span> Deletions are marked with - . </span> </td> <td> <span> Additions are marked with +. </span> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> Line 7: </td> <td> Line 7: </td> </tr> <tr> <td> <span>-</span> At the close of the 2006-2007 school year, The Aggie faced another consecutive year of deficit -- this time approaching $120,000 -- under his leadership. The two Aggie staff members responsible for overseeing The Aggie's finances at the time were business manager Mia Szmuch and advertising manager Christina Chin, who was responsible for the newspaper's lack of advertising sales.<span><br> </span>-<span>&nbsp;&nbsp;</span>-<span>&nbsp;''["Andrew</span> Pe<span>a</span>k<span>e"]'s (a </span>200<span>6</span>-200<span>7</span> ASUCD <span>senator not employed at The Aggie) opinion: "Of course the buck stops with the Editor-in-Chief."''<br> - <br> - ''["Paul Harms"]' opinion (2007-2008 ASUCD controller who is not employed at The Aggie and does not have ultimate authority over its finances, per the ASUCD bylaws): "the towering deficit was to be eliminating career staff, a move Mia, the Campus Media Board, and ASUCD </span>General Administration opposed, eliminating two members of the Editorial Board, and cutting pay for photographers. This proposal, by informed estimates, would have actually had a negative impact on the Aggie because cutting the career staff would probably cripple the Aggie's administrative functions (if not in the short run then in the long run) which would hurt the advertising department the most. In the end, a solid budget was drafted with Mia's consultation that could eliminate up to $70,000 of the deficit. The deficit won't disappear this year, of course, but it "slows the bleeding" and buys the Media Board and the Aggie leadership time to come up with a more complete solution.<span>"''</span> </td> <td> <span>+</span> At the close of the 2006-2007 school year, The Aggie faced another consecutive year of deficit -- this time approaching $120,000 -- under his leadership. The two Aggie staff members responsible for overseeing The Aggie's finances at the time were business manager Mia Szmuch and advertising manager Christina Chin, who was responsible for the newspaper's lack of advertising sales.<span>&nbsp;Of course the buck stops with the Editor</span>-<span>in</span>-<span>Chief, and</span> Pe<span>ter overruled, ignored, or failed to consult Mia on a few </span>k<span>nown occassions. Peter even submitted a FY</span>200<span>7</span>-200<span>8 Aggie Budget without involving Mia substantially; his solution to the towering deficit was to be eliminating career staff, a move Mia, the Campus Media Board, and</span> ASUCD General Administration opposed, eliminating two members of the Editorial Board, and cutting pay for photographers. This proposal, by informed estimates, would have actually had a negative impact on the Aggie because cutting the career staff would probably cripple the Aggie's administrative functions (if not in the short run then in the long run) which would hurt the advertising department the most. In the end, a solid budget was drafted with Mia's consultation that could eliminate up to $70,000 of the deficit. The deficit won't disappear this year, of course, but it "slows the bleeding" and buys the Media Board and the Aggie leadership time to come up with a more complete solution. </td> </tr> </table> </div> http://daviswiki.org/Peter_Hamilton2007-08-17 09:59:02SteveOstrowskiRevert to version 36 (like you know anything). <div id="content" class="wikipage content"> Differences for Peter Hamilton<p><strong></strong></p><table> <tr> <td> <span> Deletions are marked with - . </span> </td> <td> <span> Additions are marked with +. </span> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> Line 7: </td> <td> Line 7: </td> </tr> <tr> <td> <span>-</span> At the close of the 2006-2007 school year, The Aggie faced another consecutive year of deficit -- this time approaching $120,000 -- under his leadership. The two Aggie staff members responsible for overseeing The Aggie's finances at the time were business manager Mia Szmuch and advertising manager Christina Chin, who was responsible for the newspaper's lack of advertising sales.<span>&nbsp;Of course the buc</span>k<span>&nbsp;stops with the Editor-in-Chief, and Peter overruled, ignored, or failed to consult Mia on a few known occassions. Peter even submitted a FY</span>200<span>7</span>-200<span>8 Aggie Budget without involving Mia substantially; his solution to the towering deficit was to be eliminating career staff, a move Mia, the Campus Media Board, and</span> ASUCD General Administration opposed, eliminating two members of the Editorial Board, and cutting pay for photographers. This proposal, by informed estimates, would have actually had a negative impact on the Aggie because cutting the career staff would probably cripple the Aggie's administrative functions (if not in the short run then in the long run) which would hurt the advertising department the most. In the end, a solid budget was drafted with Mia's consultation that could eliminate up to $70,000 of the deficit. The deficit won't disappear this year, of course, but it "slows the bleeding" and buys the Media Board and the Aggie leadership time to come up with a more complete solution. </td> <td> <span>+</span> At the close of the 2006-2007 school year, The Aggie faced another consecutive year of deficit -- this time approaching $120,000 -- under his leadership. The two Aggie staff members responsible for overseeing The Aggie's finances at the time were business manager Mia Szmuch and advertising manager Christina Chin, who was responsible for the newspaper's lack of advertising sales.<span><br> + <br> + ''["Andrew Pea</span>k<span>e"]'s (a </span>200<span>6</span>-200<span>7</span> ASUCD <span>senator not employed at The Aggie) opinion: "Of course the buck stops with the Editor-in-Chief."''<br> + <br> + ''["Paul Harms"]' opinion (2007-2008 ASUCD controller who is not employed at The Aggie and does not have ultimate authority over its finances, per the ASUCD bylaws): "the towering deficit was to be eliminating career staff, a move Mia, the Campus Media Board, and ASUCD </span>General Administration opposed, eliminating two members of the Editorial Board, and cutting pay for photographers. This proposal, by informed estimates, would have actually had a negative impact on the Aggie because cutting the career staff would probably cripple the Aggie's administrative functions (if not in the short run then in the long run) which would hurt the advertising department the most. In the end, a solid budget was drafted with Mia's consultation that could eliminate up to $70,000 of the deficit. The deficit won't disappear this year, of course, but it "slows the bleeding" and buys the Media Board and the Aggie leadership time to come up with a more complete solution.<span>"''</span> </td> </tr> </table> </div> http://daviswiki.org/Peter_Hamilton2007-08-17 09:52:24WilliamLewisRevert to version 35 (factual). <div id="content" class="wikipage content"> Differences for Peter Hamilton<p><strong></strong></p><table> <tr> <td> <span> Deletions are marked with - . </span> </td> <td> <span> Additions are marked with +. </span> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> Line 7: </td> <td> Line 7: </td> </tr> <tr> <td> <span>-</span> At the close of the 2006-2007 school year, The Aggie faced another consecutive year of deficit -- this time approaching $120,000 -- under his leadership. The two Aggie staff members responsible for overseeing The Aggie's finances at the time were business manager Mia Szmuch and advertising manager Christina Chin, who was responsible for the newspaper's lack of advertising sales.<span><br> </span>-<span>&nbsp;&nbsp;</span>-<span>&nbsp;''["Andrew</span> Pe<span>a</span>k<span>e"]'s (a </span>200<span>6</span>-200<span>7</span> ASUCD <span>senator not employed at The Aggie) opinion: "Of course the buck stops with the Editor-in-Chief."''<br> - <br> - ''["Paul Harms"]' opinion (2007-2008 ASUCD controller who is not employed at The Aggie and does not have ultimate authority over its finances, per the ASUCD bylaws): "the towering deficit was to be eliminating career staff, a move Mia, the Campus Media Board, and ASUCD </span>General Administration opposed, eliminating two members of the Editorial Board, and cutting pay for photographers. This proposal, by informed estimates, would have actually had a negative impact on the Aggie because cutting the career staff would probably cripple the Aggie's administrative functions (if not in the short run then in the long run) which would hurt the advertising department the most. In the end, a solid budget was drafted with Mia's consultation that could eliminate up to $70,000 of the deficit. The deficit won't disappear this year, of course, but it "slows the bleeding" and buys the Media Board and the Aggie leadership time to come up with a more complete solution.<span>"''</span> </td> <td> <span>+</span> At the close of the 2006-2007 school year, The Aggie faced another consecutive year of deficit -- this time approaching $120,000 -- under his leadership. The two Aggie staff members responsible for overseeing The Aggie's finances at the time were business manager Mia Szmuch and advertising manager Christina Chin, who was responsible for the newspaper's lack of advertising sales.<span>&nbsp;Of course the buck stops with the Editor</span>-<span>in</span>-<span>Chief, and</span> Pe<span>ter overruled, ignored, or failed to consult Mia on a few </span>k<span>nown occassions. Peter even submitted a FY</span>200<span>7</span>-200<span>8 Aggie Budget without involving Mia substantially; his solution to the towering deficit was to be eliminating career staff, a move Mia, the Campus Media Board, and</span> ASUCD General Administration opposed, eliminating two members of the Editorial Board, and cutting pay for photographers. This proposal, by informed estimates, would have actually had a negative impact on the Aggie because cutting the career staff would probably cripple the Aggie's administrative functions (if not in the short run then in the long run) which would hurt the advertising department the most. In the end, a solid budget was drafted with Mia's consultation that could eliminate up to $70,000 of the deficit. The deficit won't disappear this year, of course, but it "slows the bleeding" and buys the Media Board and the Aggie leadership time to come up with a more complete solution. </td> </tr> </table> </div> http://daviswiki.org/Peter_Hamilton2007-08-17 09:44:58SteveOstrowskiRevert to version 34 (Suggest making "opinions" comments ). <div id="content" class="wikipage content"> Differences for Peter Hamilton<p><strong></strong></p><table> <tr> <td> <span> Deletions are marked with - . </span> </td> <td> <span> Additions are marked with +. </span> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> Line 7: </td> <td> Line 7: </td> </tr> <tr> <td> <span>-</span> At the close of the 2006-2007 school year, The Aggie faced another consecutive year of deficit -- this time approaching $120,000 -- under his leadership. The two Aggie staff members responsible for overseeing The Aggie's finances at the time were business manager Mia Szmuch and advertising manager Christina Chin, who was responsible for the newspaper's lack of advertising sales.<span>&nbsp;Of course the buc</span>k<span>&nbsp;stops with the Editor-in-Chief, and Peter overruled, ignored, or failed to consult Mia on a few known occassions. Peter even submitted a FY</span>200<span>7</span>-200<span>8 Aggie Budget without involving Mia substantially; his solution to the towering deficit was to be eliminating career staff, a move Mia, the Campus Media Board, and</span> ASUCD General Administration opposed, eliminating two members of the Editorial Board, and cutting pay for photographers. This proposal, by informed estimates, would have actually had a negative impact on the Aggie because cutting the career staff would probably cripple the Aggie's administrative functions (if not in the short run then in the long run) which would hurt the advertising department the most. In the end, a solid budget was drafted with Mia's consultation that could eliminate up to $70,000 of the deficit. The deficit won't disappear this year, of course, but it "slows the bleeding" and buys the Media Board and the Aggie leadership time to come up with a more complete solution. </td> <td> <span>+</span> At the close of the 2006-2007 school year, The Aggie faced another consecutive year of deficit -- this time approaching $120,000 -- under his leadership. The two Aggie staff members responsible for overseeing The Aggie's finances at the time were business manager Mia Szmuch and advertising manager Christina Chin, who was responsible for the newspaper's lack of advertising sales.<span><br> + <br> + ''["Andrew Pea</span>k<span>e"]'s (a </span>200<span>6</span>-200<span>7</span> ASUCD <span>senator not employed at The Aggie) opinion: "Of course the buck stops with the Editor-in-Chief."''<br> + <br> + ''["Paul Harms"]' opinion (2007-2008 ASUCD controller who is not employed at The Aggie and does not have ultimate authority over its finances, per the ASUCD bylaws): "the towering deficit was to be eliminating career staff, a move Mia, the Campus Media Board, and ASUCD </span>General Administration opposed, eliminating two members of the Editorial Board, and cutting pay for photographers. This proposal, by informed estimates, would have actually had a negative impact on the Aggie because cutting the career staff would probably cripple the Aggie's administrative functions (if not in the short run then in the long run) which would hurt the advertising department the most. In the end, a solid budget was drafted with Mia's consultation that could eliminate up to $70,000 of the deficit. The deficit won't disappear this year, of course, but it "slows the bleeding" and buys the Media Board and the Aggie leadership time to come up with a more complete solution.<span>"''</span> </td> </tr> </table> </div> http://daviswiki.org/Peter_Hamilton2007-08-17 08:04:14WilliamLewisRevert to version 33 (welcome to the wiki, where we welcome pov in article text.). <div id="content" class="wikipage content"> Differences for Peter Hamilton<p><strong></strong></p><table> <tr> <td> <span> Deletions are marked with - . </span> </td> <td> <span> Additions are marked with +. </span> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> Line 7: </td> <td> Line 7: </td> </tr> <tr> <td> <span>-</span> At the close of the 2006-2007 school year, The Aggie faced another consecutive year of deficit -- this time approaching $120,000 -- under his leadership. The two Aggie staff members responsible for overseeing The Aggie's finances at the time were business manager Mia Szmuch and advertising manager Christina Chin, who was responsible for the newspaper's lack of advertising sales.<span><br> </span>-<span>&nbsp;&nbsp;</span>-<span>&nbsp;''["Andrew</span> Pe<span>a</span>k<span>e"]'s (a </span>200<span>6</span>-200<span>7</span> ASUCD <span>senator not employed at The Aggie) opinion: "Of course the buck stops with the Editor-in-Chief."''<br> - <br> - ''["Paul Harms"]' opinion (2007-2008 ASUCD controller who is not employed at The Aggie and does not have ultimate authority over its finances, per the ASUCD bylaws): "the towering deficit was to be eliminating career staff, a move Mia, the Campus Media Board, and ASUCD </span>General Administration opposed, eliminating two members of the Editorial Board, and cutting pay for photographers. This proposal, by informed estimates, would have actually had a negative impact on the Aggie because cutting the career staff would probably cripple the Aggie's administrative functions (if not in the short run then in the long run) which would hurt the advertising department the most. In the end, a solid budget was drafted with Mia's consultation that could eliminate up to $70,000 of the deficit. The deficit won't disappear this year, of course, but it "slows the bleeding" and buys the Media Board and the Aggie leadership time to come up with a more complete solution.<span>"''</span> </td> <td> <span>+</span> At the close of the 2006-2007 school year, The Aggie faced another consecutive year of deficit -- this time approaching $120,000 -- under his leadership. The two Aggie staff members responsible for overseeing The Aggie's finances at the time were business manager Mia Szmuch and advertising manager Christina Chin, who was responsible for the newspaper's lack of advertising sales.<span>&nbsp;Of course the buck stops with the Editor</span>-<span>in</span>-<span>Chief, and</span> Pe<span>ter overruled, ignored, or failed to consult Mia on a few </span>k<span>nown occassions. Peter even submitted a FY</span>200<span>7</span>-200<span>8 Aggie Budget without involving Mia substantially; his solution to the towering deficit was to be eliminating career staff, a move Mia, the Campus Media Board, and</span> ASUCD General Administration opposed, eliminating two members of the Editorial Board, and cutting pay for photographers. This proposal, by informed estimates, would have actually had a negative impact on the Aggie because cutting the career staff would probably cripple the Aggie's administrative functions (if not in the short run then in the long run) which would hurt the advertising department the most. In the end, a solid budget was drafted with Mia's consultation that could eliminate up to $70,000 of the deficit. The deficit won't disappear this year, of course, but it "slows the bleeding" and buys the Media Board and the Aggie leadership time to come up with a more complete solution. </td> </tr> </table> </div> http://daviswiki.org/Peter_Hamilton2007-08-17 01:33:23LisaAdamsRevert to version 32 (not taking away opportunity to vent, just marking vents as opinions). <div id="content" class="wikipage content"> Differences for Peter Hamilton<p><strong></strong></p><table> <tr> <td> <span> Deletions are marked with - . </span> </td> <td> <span> Additions are marked with +. </span> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> Line 7: </td> <td> Line 7: </td> </tr> <tr> <td> <span>-</span> At the close of the 2006-2007 school year, The Aggie faced another consecutive year of deficit -- this time approaching $120,000 -- under his leadership. The two Aggie staff members responsible for overseeing The Aggie's finances at the time were business manager Mia Szmuch and advertising manager Christina Chin, who was responsible for the newspaper's lack of advertising sales.<span>&nbsp;Of course the buc</span>k<span>&nbsp;stops with the Editor-in-Chief, and Peter overruled, ignored, or failed to consult Mia on a few known occassions. Peter even submitted a FY</span>200<span>7</span>-200<span>8 Aggie Budget without involving Mia substantially; his solution to the towering deficit was to be eliminating career staff, a move Mia, the Campus Media Board, and</span> ASUCD General Administration opposed, eliminating two members of the Editorial Board, and cutting pay for photographers. This proposal, by informed estimates, would have actually had a negative impact on the Aggie because cutting the career staff would probably cripple the Aggie's administrative functions (if not in the short run then in the long run) which would hurt the advertising department the most. In the end, a solid budget was drafted with Mia's consultation that could eliminate up to $70,000 of the deficit. The deficit won't disappear this year, of course, but it "slows the bleeding" and buys the Media Board and the Aggie leadership time to come up with a more complete solution. </td> <td> <span>+</span> At the close of the 2006-2007 school year, The Aggie faced another consecutive year of deficit -- this time approaching $120,000 -- under his leadership. The two Aggie staff members responsible for overseeing The Aggie's finances at the time were business manager Mia Szmuch and advertising manager Christina Chin, who was responsible for the newspaper's lack of advertising sales.<span><br> + <br> + ''["Andrew Pea</span>k<span>e"]'s (a </span>200<span>6</span>-200<span>7</span> ASUCD <span>senator not employed at The Aggie) opinion: "Of course the buck stops with the Editor-in-Chief."''<br> + <br> + ''["Paul Harms"]' opinion (2007-2008 ASUCD controller who is not employed at The Aggie and does not have ultimate authority over its finances, per the ASUCD bylaws): "the towering deficit was to be eliminating career staff, a move Mia, the Campus Media Board, and ASUCD </span>General Administration opposed, eliminating two members of the Editorial Board, and cutting pay for photographers. This proposal, by informed estimates, would have actually had a negative impact on the Aggie because cutting the career staff would probably cripple the Aggie's administrative functions (if not in the short run then in the long run) which would hurt the advertising department the most. In the end, a solid budget was drafted with Mia's consultation that could eliminate up to $70,000 of the deficit. The deficit won't disappear this year, of course, but it "slows the bleeding" and buys the Media Board and the Aggie leadership time to come up with a more complete solution.<span>"''</span> </td> </tr> </table> </div> http://daviswiki.org/Peter_Hamilton2007-08-17 01:25:42WilliamLewisRevert to version 31 (doesn't need to be moved out. pretty factual, anyway.). <div id="content" class="wikipage content"> Differences for Peter Hamilton<p><strong></strong></p><table> <tr> <td> <span> Deletions are marked with - . </span> </td> <td> <span> Additions are marked with +. </span> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> Line 7: </td> <td> Line 7: </td> </tr> <tr> <td> <span>-</span> At the close of the 2006-2007 school year, The Aggie faced another consecutive year of deficit -- this time approaching $120,000 -- under his leadership. The two Aggie staff members responsible for overseeing The Aggie's finances at the time were business manager Mia Szmuch and advertising manager Christina Chin, who was responsible for the newspaper's lack of advertising sales.<span><br> </span>-<span>&nbsp;&nbsp;</span>-<span>&nbsp;''["Andrew</span> Pe<span>a</span>k<span>e"]'s (a </span>200<span>6</span>-200<span>7</span> ASUCD <span>senator not employed at The Aggie) opinion: "Of course the buck stops with the Editor-in-Chief."''<br> - <br> - ''["Paul Harms"]' opinion (2007-2008 ASUCD controller who is not employed at The Aggie and does not have ultimate authority over its finances, per the ASUCD bylaws): "the towering deficit was to be eliminating career staff, a move Mia, the Campus Media Board, and ASUCD </span>General Administration opposed, eliminating two members of the Editorial Board, and cutting pay for photographers. This proposal, by informed estimates, would have actually had a negative impact on the Aggie because cutting the career staff would probably cripple the Aggie's administrative functions (if not in the short run then in the long run) which would hurt the advertising department the most. In the end, a solid budget was drafted with Mia's consultation that could eliminate up to $70,000 of the deficit. The deficit won't disappear this year, of course, but it "slows the bleeding" and buys the Media Board and the Aggie leadership time to come up with a more complete solution.<span>"''</span> </td> <td> <span>+</span> At the close of the 2006-2007 school year, The Aggie faced another consecutive year of deficit -- this time approaching $120,000 -- under his leadership. The two Aggie staff members responsible for overseeing The Aggie's finances at the time were business manager Mia Szmuch and advertising manager Christina Chin, who was responsible for the newspaper's lack of advertising sales.<span>&nbsp;Of course the buck stops with the Editor</span>-<span>in</span>-<span>Chief, and</span> Pe<span>ter overruled, ignored, or failed to consult Mia on a few </span>k<span>nown occassions. Peter even submitted a FY</span>200<span>7</span>-200<span>8 Aggie Budget without involving Mia substantially; his solution to the towering deficit was to be eliminating career staff, a move Mia, the Campus Media Board, and</span> ASUCD General Administration opposed, eliminating two members of the Editorial Board, and cutting pay for photographers. This proposal, by informed estimates, would have actually had a negative impact on the Aggie because cutting the career staff would probably cripple the Aggie's administrative functions (if not in the short run then in the long run) which would hurt the advertising department the most. In the end, a solid budget was drafted with Mia's consultation that could eliminate up to $70,000 of the deficit. The deficit won't disappear this year, of course, but it "slows the bleeding" and buys the Media Board and the Aggie leadership time to come up with a more complete solution. </td> </tr> </table> </div> http://daviswiki.org/Peter_Hamilton2007-08-17 00:57:30LisaAdamsseparated out the opinions <div id="content" class="wikipage content"> Differences for Peter Hamilton<p><strong></strong></p><table> <tr> <td> <span> Deletions are marked with - . </span> </td> <td> <span> Additions are marked with +. </span> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> Line 7: </td> <td> Line 7: </td> </tr> <tr> <td> <span>-</span> At the close of the 2006-2007 school year, The Aggie faced another consecutive year of deficit -- this time approaching $120,000 -- under his leadership. The two Aggie staff members responsible for overseeing The Aggie's finances at the time were business manager Mia Szmuch and advertising manager Christina Chin, who was responsible for the newspaper's lack of advertising sales.<span>&nbsp;Of course the buc</span>k<span>&nbsp;stops with the Editor-in-Chief, and Peter overruled, ignored, or failed to consult Mia on a few known occassions. Peter even submitted a FY</span>200<span>7</span>-200<span>8 Aggie Budget without involving Mia substantially; his solution to the towering deficit was to be eliminating career staff, a move Mia, the Campus Media Board, and</span> ASUCD General Administration opposed, eliminating two members of the Editorial Board, and cutting pay for photographers. This proposal, by informed estimates, would have actually had a negative impact on the Aggie because cutting the career staff would probably cripple the Aggie's administrative functions (if not in the short run then in the long run) which would hurt the advertising department the most. In the end, a solid budget was drafted with Mia's consultation that could eliminate up to $70,000 of the deficit. The deficit won't disappear this year, of course, but it "slows the bleeding" and buys the Media Board and the Aggie leadership time to come up with a more complete solution. </td> <td> <span>+</span> At the close of the 2006-2007 school year, The Aggie faced another consecutive year of deficit -- this time approaching $120,000 -- under his leadership. The two Aggie staff members responsible for overseeing The Aggie's finances at the time were business manager Mia Szmuch and advertising manager Christina Chin, who was responsible for the newspaper's lack of advertising sales.<span><br> + <br> + ''["Andrew Pea</span>k<span>e"]'s (a </span>200<span>6</span>-200<span>7</span> ASUCD <span>senator not employed at The Aggie) opinion: "Of course the buck stops with the Editor-in-Chief."''<br> + <br> + ''["Paul Harms"]' opinion (2007-2008 ASUCD controller who is not employed at The Aggie and does not have ultimate authority over its finances, per the ASUCD bylaws): "the towering deficit was to be eliminating career staff, a move Mia, the Campus Media Board, and ASUCD </span>General Administration opposed, eliminating two members of the Editorial Board, and cutting pay for photographers. This proposal, by informed estimates, would have actually had a negative impact on the Aggie because cutting the career staff would probably cripple the Aggie's administrative functions (if not in the short run then in the long run) which would hurt the advertising department the most. In the end, a solid budget was drafted with Mia's consultation that could eliminate up to $70,000 of the deficit. The deficit won't disappear this year, of course, but it "slows the bleeding" and buys the Media Board and the Aggie leadership time to come up with a more complete solution.<span>"''</span> </td> </tr> </table> </div> http://daviswiki.org/Peter_Hamilton2007-08-16 05:26:19JabberWokky <div id="content" class="wikipage content"> Differences for Peter Hamilton<p><strong></strong></p><table> <tr> <td> <span> Deletions are marked with - . </span> </td> <td> <span> Additions are marked with +. </span> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> Line 9: </td> <td> Line 9: </td> </tr> <tr> <td> <span>-</span> [[Include(The California Aggie/2006-2007)]] </td> <td> <span>+</span> [[Include(The California Aggie/2006-2007<span>&nbsp;Staff</span>)]] </td> </tr> </table> </div> http://daviswiki.org/Peter_Hamilton2007-08-16 05:25:34JabberWokky <div id="content" class="wikipage content"> Differences for Peter Hamilton<p><strong></strong></p><table> <tr> <td> <span> Deletions are marked with - . </span> </td> <td> <span> Additions are marked with +. </span> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> Line 1: </td> <td> Line 1: </td> </tr> <tr> <td> <span>- </span>Peter served as the editor in chief of ["The California Aggie"] for the 2006-2007 school year. He previously served as the science and technology editor in 2005-2006, and as a science and technology reporter for two years prior to that. </td> <td> <span>+ '''</span>Peter<span>&nbsp;Hamilton'''</span> served as the editor in chief of ["The California Aggie"] for the 2006-2007 school year. He previously served as the science and technology editor in 2005-2006, and as a science and technology reporter for two years prior to that. </td> </tr> <tr> <td> Line 8: </td> <td> Line 8: </td> </tr> <tr> <td> </td> <td> <span>+ <br> + [[Include(The California Aggie/2006-2007)]]</span> </td> </tr> </table> </div> http://daviswiki.org/Peter_Hamilton2007-08-15 21:01:27PaulHarmsDon't blame the business manager, please <div id="content" class="wikipage content"> Differences for Peter Hamilton<p><strong></strong></p><table> <tr> <td> <span> Deletions are marked with - . </span> </td> <td> <span> Additions are marked with +. </span> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> Line 7: </td> <td> Line 7: </td> </tr> <tr> <td> <span>- At the close of the 2006-2007 school year, The Aggie faced another consecutive year of deficit -- this time approaching $120,000 -- under his leadership. The two Aggie staff members responsible for overseeing The Aggie's finances at the time were business manager Mia Szmuch and advertising manager Christina Chin, who was responsible for the newspaper's lack of advertising sales. Of course the buck stops with the Editor-in-Chief.</span> </td> <td> <span>+ At the close of the 2006-2007 school year, The Aggie faced another consecutive year of deficit -- this time approaching $120,000 -- under his leadership. The two Aggie staff members responsible for overseeing The Aggie's finances at the time were business manager Mia Szmuch and advertising manager Christina Chin, who was responsible for the newspaper's lack of advertising sales. Of course the buck stops with the Editor-in-Chief, and Peter overruled, ignored, or failed to consult Mia on a few known occassions. Peter even submitted a FY2007-2008 Aggie Budget without involving Mia substantially; his solution to the towering deficit was to be eliminating career staff, a move Mia, the Campus Media Board, and ASUCD General Administration opposed, eliminating two members of the Editorial Board, and cutting pay for photographers. This proposal, by informed estimates, would have actually had a negative impact on the Aggie because cutting the career staff would probably cripple the Aggie's administrative functions (if not in the short run then in the long run) which would hurt the advertising department the most. In the end, a solid budget was drafted with Mia's consultation that could eliminate up to $70,000 of the deficit. The deficit won't disappear this year, of course, but it "slows the bleeding" and buys the Media Board and the Aggie leadership time to come up with a more complete solution.</span> </td> </tr> </table> </div> http://daviswiki.org/Peter_Hamilton2007-08-15 19:26:23AndrewPeake <div id="content" class="wikipage content"> Differences for Peter Hamilton<p><strong></strong></p><table> <tr> <td> <span> Deletions are marked with - . </span> </td> <td> <span> Additions are marked with +. </span> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> Line 7: </td> <td> Line 7: </td> </tr> <tr> <td> <span>-</span> At the close of the 2006-2007 school year, The Aggie faced another consecutive year of deficit -- this time approaching $120,000 -- under his leadership. The two Aggie staff members responsible for overseeing The Aggie's finances at the time were business manager Mia Szmuch and advertising manager Christina Chin, who was responsible for the newspaper's lack of advertising sales. </td> <td> <span>+</span> At the close of the 2006-2007 school year, The Aggie faced another consecutive year of deficit -- this time approaching $120,000 -- under his leadership. The two Aggie staff members responsible for overseeing The Aggie's finances at the time were business manager Mia Szmuch and advertising manager Christina Chin, who was responsible for the newspaper's lack of advertising sales.<span>&nbsp;Of course the buck stops with the Editor-in-Chief.</span> </td> </tr> </table> </div> http://daviswiki.org/Peter_Hamilton2007-08-15 19:24:48AndrewPeakeRevert to version 25 (The more you know). <div id="content" class="wikipage content"> Differences for Peter Hamilton<p><strong></strong></p><table> <tr> <td> <span> Deletions are marked with - . </span> </td> <td> <span> Additions are marked with +. </span> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> Line 3: </td> <td> Line 3: </td> </tr> <tr> <td> <span>-</span> On May 15, 2007, 31 Aggie staff members, including five of the nine editorial board members, asked Peter Hamilton and ["Talia Kennedy"], the campus news editor, to resign. In a letter presented publicly at a Campus Media Board meeting, the members expressed the reasons they felt warranted his resignation, including poor leadership, inadequate training of the incoming editor in chief, unnecessary expenses incurred while attending the 2007 California College Media Association awards banquet, the fostering of what they called a "divisive and unprofessional" atmosphere, and the detrimental effects of a "secretive relationship" he allegedly had with the campus editor. Peter and the campus editor responded to this letter with their ["The California Aggie Controversies/Reply to Hamilton letter" own letter], stating that the expenses were justified and chastising the signatories of the original letter for their lack of professionalism and their desire to "publicly humiliate us — and our institution — at [the] Campus Media Board meeting by dragging internal personal issues into the public." At the time the letter was presented, there were only 15 days left in his term as chief. See ["The California Aggie Controversies"] for more information. </td> <td> <span>+</span> On May 15, 2007, 31 Aggie staff members, including five of the nine editorial board members, asked Peter Hamilton and ["Talia Kennedy"], the campus news editor, to resign. In a letter presented publicly at a Campus Media Board meeting, the members expressed the reasons they felt warranted his resignation, including poor leadership, inadequate training of the incoming editor in chief, unnecessary expenses incurred while attending the 2007 California College Media Association awards banquet, the fostering of what they called a "divisive and unprofessional" atmosphere, and the detrimental effects of a "secretive relationship" he allegedly had with the campus editor. Peter and the campus editor responded to this letter with their ["The California Aggie Controversies/Reply to Hamilton letter" own letter], stating that the expenses were justified and chastising the signatories of the original letter for their lack of professionalism and their desire to "publicly humiliate us — and our institution — at [the] Campus Media Board meeting by dragging internal personal issues into the public."<span><br> + <br> +</span> At the time the letter was presented, there were only 15 days left in his term as chief. See ["The California Aggie Controversies"] for more information.<span><br> + <br> + At the close of the 2006-2007 school year, The Aggie faced another consecutive year of deficit -- this time approaching $120,000 -- under his leadership. The two Aggie staff members responsible for overseeing The Aggie's finances at the time were business manager Mia Szmuch and advertising manager Christina Chin, who was responsible for the newspaper's lack of advertising sales.</span> </td> </tr> </table> </div> http://daviswiki.org/Peter_Hamilton2007-08-15 17:43:55LisaAdamsmoved info to main Aggie page <div id="content" class="wikipage content"> Differences for Peter Hamilton<p><strong></strong></p><table> <tr> <td> <span> Deletions are marked with - . </span> </td> <td> <span> Additions are marked with +. </span> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> Line 3: </td> <td> Line 3: </td> </tr> <tr> <td> <span>-</span> On May 15, 2007, 31 Aggie staff members, including five of the nine editorial board members, asked Peter Hamilton and ["Talia Kennedy"], the campus news editor, to resign. In a letter presented publicly at a Campus Media Board meeting, the members expressed the reasons they felt warranted his resignation, including poor leadership, inadequate training of the incoming editor in chief, unnecessary expenses incurred while attending the 2007 California College Media Association awards banquet, the fostering of what they called a "divisive and unprofessional" atmosphere, and the detrimental effects of a "secretive relationship" he allegedly had with the campus editor. Peter and the campus editor responded to this letter with their ["The California Aggie Controversies/Reply to Hamilton letter" own letter], stating that the expenses were justified and chastising the signatories of the original letter for their lack of professionalism and their desire to "publicly humiliate us — and our institution — at [the] Campus Media Board meeting by dragging internal personal issues into the public."<span><br> - <br> -</span> At the time the letter was presented, there were only 15 days left in his term as chief. See ["The California Aggie Controversies"] for more information.<span><br> - <br> - At the close of the 2006-2007 school year, The Aggie faced another consecutive year of deficit -- this time approaching $120,000 -- under his leadership. The two Aggie staff members responsible for overseeing The Aggie's finances at the time were business manager Mia Szmuch and advertising manager Christina Chin, who was responsible for the newspaper's lack of advertising sales.</span> </td> <td> <span>+</span> On May 15, 2007, 31 Aggie staff members, including five of the nine editorial board members, asked Peter Hamilton and ["Talia Kennedy"], the campus news editor, to resign. In a letter presented publicly at a Campus Media Board meeting, the members expressed the reasons they felt warranted his resignation, including poor leadership, inadequate training of the incoming editor in chief, unnecessary expenses incurred while attending the 2007 California College Media Association awards banquet, the fostering of what they called a "divisive and unprofessional" atmosphere, and the detrimental effects of a "secretive relationship" he allegedly had with the campus editor. Peter and the campus editor responded to this letter with their ["The California Aggie Controversies/Reply to Hamilton letter" own letter], stating that the expenses were justified and chastising the signatories of the original letter for their lack of professionalism and their desire to "publicly humiliate us — and our institution — at [the] Campus Media Board meeting by dragging internal personal issues into the public." At the time the letter was presented, there were only 15 days left in his term as chief. See ["The California Aggie Controversies"] for more information. </td> </tr> </table> </div> http://daviswiki.org/Peter_Hamilton2007-08-15 17:39:00LisaAdamsupdates; Elisa, get YOUR facts straight -- her name is Christina CHIN, not LEE <div id="content" class="wikipage content"> Differences for Peter Hamilton<p><strong></strong></p><table> <tr> <td> <span> Deletions are marked with - . </span> </td> <td> <span> Additions are marked with +. </span> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> Line 7: </td> <td> Line 7: </td> </tr> <tr> <td> <span>- During his term as editor in chief, The Aggie faced another consecutive year of deficit -- this time approaching $120,000 -- under his leadership. Some may also feel the need to blame business manager Mia Szmuch, even though the debt is due mostly to lack of ad sales, which falls under ad manager Christina Lee's department.</span> </td> <td> <span>+ At the close of the 2006-2007 school year, The Aggie faced another consecutive year of deficit -- this time approaching $120,000 -- under his leadership. The two Aggie staff members responsible for overseeing The Aggie's finances at the time were business manager Mia Szmuch and advertising manager Christina Chin, who was responsible for the newspaper's lack of advertising sales.</span> </td> </tr> </table> </div> http://daviswiki.org/Peter_Hamilton2007-08-15 17:10:33ElisaHoughget yo' facts straight <div id="content" class="wikipage content"> Differences for Peter Hamilton<p><strong></strong></p><table> <tr> <td> <span> Deletions are marked with - . </span> </td> <td> <span> Additions are marked with +. </span> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> Line 7: </td> <td> Line 7: </td> </tr> <tr> <td> <span>-</span> During his term as editor in chief, The Aggie faced another consecutive year of deficit -- this time approaching $120,000 -- under <span>the</span> leadership<span>&nbsp;of</span> business manager Mia Szmuch. </td> <td> <span>+</span> During his term as editor in chief, The Aggie faced another consecutive year of deficit -- this time approaching $120,000 -- under <span>his</span> leadership<span>. Some may also feel the need to blame</span> business manager Mia Szmuch<span>, even though the debt is due mostly to lack of ad sales, which falls under ad manager Christina Lee's department</span>. </td> </tr> </table> </div> http://daviswiki.org/Peter_Hamilton2007-08-15 15:51:54LisaAdamscleaned up, added info <div id="content" class="wikipage content"> Differences for Peter Hamilton<p><strong></strong></p><table> <tr> <td> <span> Deletions are marked with - . </span> </td> <td> <span> Additions are marked with +. </span> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> Line 1: </td> <td> Line 1: </td> </tr> <tr> <td> <span>-</span> Peter <span>i</span>s the editor in chief of ["The California Aggie"] for the 2006-07 school year. <span>&nbsp;</span>He previously served as the <span>Science &amp; T</span>echnology editor in 2005-06. </td> <td> <span>+</span> Peter <span>served a</span>s the editor in chief of ["The California Aggie"] for the 2006-<span>20</span>07 school year. He previously served as the <span>science and t</span>echnology editor in 2005-<span>20</span>06<span>, and as a science and technology reporter for two years prior to that</span>. </td> </tr> <tr> <td> Line 3: </td> <td> Line 3: </td> </tr> <tr> <td> <span>-</span> On May 15, 2007, 31 Aggie staff members, including five of the nine editorial board members, asked Peter Hamilton and ["Talia Kennedy"], the campus news editor, to resign. <span>&nbsp;</span>In a letter presented publicly at a Campus Media Board meeting, the members expressed the reasons they felt warrant his resignation, including poor leadership, inadequate training of the incoming editor in chief, unnecessary expenses incurred while attending the 2007 California College Media Association awards banquet, the fostering of <span>a </span>what they called a "divisive and unprofessional" atmosphere, and the detrimental effects of a "secretive relationship" he <span>has</span> with the campus editor. <span>&nbsp;</span>Peter and the <span>C</span>ampus editor responded to this letter with their ["The California Aggie Controversies/Reply to Hamilton letter" own letter], stating that the expenses were justified and chastising the signatories of the original letter for their lack of professionalism and their desire to "publicly humiliate us — and our institution — at [the] Campus Media Board meeting by dragging internal personal issues into the public." </td> <td> <span>+</span> On May 15, 2007, 31 Aggie staff members, including five of the nine editorial board members, asked Peter Hamilton and ["Talia Kennedy"], the campus news editor, to resign. In a letter presented publicly at a Campus Media Board meeting, the members expressed the reasons they felt warrant<span>ed</span> his resignation, including poor leadership, inadequate training of the incoming editor in chief, unnecessary expenses incurred while attending the 2007 California College Media Association awards banquet, the fostering of what they called a "divisive and unprofessional" atmosphere, and the detrimental effects of a "secretive relationship" he <span>allegedly had</span> with the campus editor. Peter and the <span>c</span>ampus editor responded to this letter with their ["The California Aggie Controversies/Reply to Hamilton letter" own letter], stating that the expenses were justified and chastising the signatories of the original letter for their lack of professionalism and their desire to "publicly humiliate us — and our institution — at [the] Campus Media Board meeting by dragging internal personal issues into the public." </td> </tr> <tr> <td> Line 5: </td> <td> Line 5: </td> </tr> <tr> <td> <span>-</span> At the time the letter was presented, there were only 15 days left in his term as <span>C</span>hief. See ["The California Aggie Controversies"] for more information. </td> <td> <span>+</span> At the time the letter was presented, there were only 15 days left in his term as <span>c</span>hief. See ["The California Aggie Controversies"] for more information. </td> </tr> <tr> <td> Line 7: </td> <td> Line 7: </td> </tr> <tr> <td> <span>-</span> During his term as editor in chief, The Aggie faced another consecutive year of deficit<span>,</span> this time approaching $120,000. </td> <td> <span>+</span> During his term as editor in chief, The Aggie faced another consecutive year of deficit<span>&nbsp;--</span> this time approaching $120,000<span>&nbsp;-- under the leadership of business manager Mia Szmuch</span>. </td> </tr> </table> </div> http://daviswiki.org/Peter_Hamilton2007-05-18 14:21:23GeoffJohnsonFixed link <div id="content" class="wikipage content"> Differences for Peter Hamilton<p><strong></strong></p><table> <tr> <td> <span> Deletions are marked with - . </span> </td> <td> <span> Additions are marked with +. </span> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> Line 3: </td> <td> Line 3: </td> </tr> <tr> <td> <span>-</span> On May 15, 2007, 31 Aggie staff members, including five of the nine editorial board members, asked Peter Hamilton and [<span>''</span>Talia Kennedy<span>''</span>], the campus news editor, to resign. In a letter presented publicly at a Campus Media Board meeting, the members expressed the reasons they felt warrant his resignation, including poor leadership, inadequate training of the incoming editor in chief, unnecessary expenses incurred while attending the 2007 California College Media Association awards banquet, the fostering of a what they called a "divisive and unprofessional" atmosphere, and the detrimental effects of a "secretive relationship" he has with the campus editor. Peter and the Campus editor responded to this letter with their ["The California Aggie Controversies/Reply to Hamilton letter" own letter], stating that the expenses were justified and chastising the signatories of the original letter for their lack of professionalism and their desire to "publicly humiliate us — and our institution — at [the] Campus Media Board meeting by dragging internal personal issues into the public." </td> <td> <span>+</span> On May 15, 2007, 31 Aggie staff members, including five of the nine editorial board members, asked Peter Hamilton and [<span>"</span>Talia Kennedy<span>"</span>], the campus news editor, to resign. In a letter presented publicly at a Campus Media Board meeting, the members expressed the reasons they felt warrant his resignation, including poor leadership, inadequate training of the incoming editor in chief, unnecessary expenses incurred while attending the 2007 California College Media Association awards banquet, the fostering of a what they called a "divisive and unprofessional" atmosphere, and the detrimental effects of a "secretive relationship" he has with the campus editor. Peter and the Campus editor responded to this letter with their ["The California Aggie Controversies/Reply to Hamilton letter" own letter], stating that the expenses were justified and chastising the signatories of the original letter for their lack of professionalism and their desire to "publicly humiliate us — and our institution — at [the] Campus Media Board meeting by dragging internal personal issues into the public." </td> </tr> </table> </div> http://daviswiki.org/Peter_Hamilton2007-05-18 14:19:34GeoffJohnsonAdded link <div id="content" class="wikipage content"> Differences for Peter Hamilton<p><strong></strong></p><table> <tr> <td> <span> Deletions are marked with - . </span> </td> <td> <span> Additions are marked with +. </span> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> Line 3: </td> <td> Line 3: </td> </tr> <tr> <td> <span>-</span> On May 15, 2007, 31 Aggie staff members, including five of the nine editorial board members, asked Peter Hamilton and the campus news editor to resign. In a letter presented publicly at a Campus Media Board meeting, the members expressed the reasons they felt warrant his resignation, including poor leadership, inadequate training of the incoming editor in chief, unnecessary expenses incurred while attending the 2007 California College Media Association awards banquet, the fostering of a what they called a "divisive and unprofessional" atmosphere, and the detrimental effects of a "secretive relationship" he has with the campus editor. Peter and the Campus editor responded to this letter with their ["The California Aggie Controversies/Reply to Hamilton letter" own letter], stating that the expenses were justified and chastising the signatories of the original letter for their lack of professionalism and their desire to "publicly humiliate us — and our institution — at [the] Campus Media Board meeting by dragging internal personal issues into the public." </td> <td> <span>+</span> On May 15, 2007, 31 Aggie staff members, including five of the nine editorial board members, asked Peter Hamilton and <span>[''Talia Kennedy''], </span>the campus news editor<span>,</span> to resign. In a letter presented publicly at a Campus Media Board meeting, the members expressed the reasons they felt warrant his resignation, including poor leadership, inadequate training of the incoming editor in chief, unnecessary expenses incurred while attending the 2007 California College Media Association awards banquet, the fostering of a what they called a "divisive and unprofessional" atmosphere, and the detrimental effects of a "secretive relationship" he has with the campus editor. Peter and the Campus editor responded to this letter with their ["The California Aggie Controversies/Reply to Hamilton letter" own letter], stating that the expenses were justified and chastising the signatories of the original letter for their lack of professionalism and their desire to "publicly humiliate us — and our institution — at [the] Campus Media Board meeting by dragging internal personal issues into the public." </td> </tr> </table> </div> http://daviswiki.org/Peter_Hamilton2007-05-17 17:47:46PhilipNeustromadded that peter/campus ed responded, linked their response and added a bit ofit <div id="content" class="wikipage content"> Differences for Peter Hamilton<p><strong></strong></p><table> <tr> <td> <span> Deletions are marked with - . </span> </td> <td> <span> Additions are marked with +. </span> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> Line 3: </td> <td> Line 3: </td> </tr> <tr> <td> <span>-</span> On May 15, 2007, 31 Aggie staff members, including five of the nine editorial board members, asked Peter Hamilton and the campus news editor to resign. In a letter presented publicly at a Campus Media Board meeting, the members expressed the reasons they fe<span>el</span> warrant his resignation, including poor leadership, inadequate training of the incoming editor in chief, unnecessary expenses incurred while attending the 2007 California College Media Association awards banquet, the fostering of a <span>“</span>divisive and unprofessional<span>” atmosphere, and the detrimental effects of the “</span>secretive relationship<span>”</span> he has with the campus editor. During his term as editor in chief, The Aggie faced another consecutive year of deficit, this time approaching $120,000.<span>&nbsp;&nbsp;See ["The California Aggie Controversies"] for more information.</span> </td> <td> <span>+</span> On May 15, 2007, 31 Aggie staff members, including five of the nine editorial board members, asked Peter Hamilton and the campus news editor to resign. <span>&nbsp;</span>In a letter presented publicly at a Campus Media Board meeting, the members expressed the reasons they fe<span>lt</span> warrant his resignation, including poor leadership, inadequate training of the incoming editor in chief, unnecessary expenses incurred while attending the 2007 California College Media Association awards banquet, the fostering of a <span>what they called a "</span>divisive and unprofessional<span>" atmosphere, and the detrimental effects of a "</span>secretive relationship<span>"</span> he has with the campus editor.<span>&nbsp;&nbsp;Peter and the Campus editor responded to this letter with their ["The California Aggie Controversies/Reply to Hamilton letter" own letter], stating that the expenses were justified and chastising the signatories of the original letter for their lack of professionalism and their desire to "publicly humiliate us — and our institution — at [the] Campus Media Board meeting by dragging internal personal issues into the public."<br> + <br> + At the time the letter was presented, there were only 15 days left in his term as Chief. See ["The California Aggie Controversies"] for more information.<br> + <br> +</span> During his term as editor in chief, The Aggie faced another consecutive year of deficit, this time approaching $120,000. </td> </tr> </table> </div> http://daviswiki.org/Peter_Hamilton2007-05-16 23:46:34PeterHamiltonMinor: I am not a member of Theta Xi. <div id="content" class="wikipage content"> Differences for Peter Hamilton<p><strong></strong></p><table> <tr> <td> <span> Deletions are marked with - . </span> </td> <td> <span> Additions are marked with +. </span> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> Line 1: </td> <td> Line 1: </td> </tr> <tr> <td> <span>-</span> Peter is the editor in chief of ["The California Aggie"] for the 2006-07 school year. He previously served as the Science &amp; Technology editor in 2005-06.<span>&nbsp;Peter is also a member of the ["Theta Xi"] fraternity.</span> </td> <td> <span>+</span> Peter is the editor in chief of ["The California Aggie"] for the 2006-07 school year. He previously served as the Science &amp; Technology editor in 2005-06. </td> </tr> </table> </div> http://daviswiki.org/Peter_Hamilton2007-05-16 23:42:08WilliamLewisminor <div id="content" class="wikipage content"> Differences for Peter Hamilton<p><strong></strong></p><table> <tr> <td> <span> Deletions are marked with - . </span> </td> <td> <span> Additions are marked with +. </span> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> Line 1: </td> <td> Line 1: </td> </tr> <tr> <td> <span>-</span> Peter is the editor in chief of ["The California Aggie"] for the 2006-07 school year. He previously served as the Science &amp; Technology editor in 2005-06. </td> <td> <span>+</span> Peter is the editor in chief of ["The California Aggie"] for the 2006-07 school year. He previously served as the Science &amp; Technology editor in 2005-06.<span>&nbsp;Peter is also a member of the ["Theta Xi"] fraternity.</span> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> Line 3: </td> <td> Line 3: </td> </tr> <tr> <td> <span>-</span> On May 15, 2007, 31 Aggie staff members, including five of the nine editorial board members, asked Peter Hamilton and the campus news editor to resign. In a letter presented publicly at a Campus Media Board meeting, the members expressed the reasons they feel warrant his resignation, including <span>the “unfair” training of the incoming editor in chief; “</span>unnecessary expenses incurred while attending the 2007 California College Media Association awards banquet”<span>; the fostering of a “divisive and unprofessional” atmosphere;</span> and the detrimental effects of the “secretive relationship” he has with the campus editor. During his term as editor in chief, The Aggie faced another consecutive year of deficit, this time approaching $120,000. <span>More information can be found at</span> ["The California Aggie Controversies"] for more information. </td> <td> <span>+</span> On May 15, 2007, 31 Aggie staff members, including five of the nine editorial board members, asked Peter Hamilton and the campus news editor to resign. In a letter presented publicly at a Campus Media Board meeting, the members expressed the reasons they feel warrant his resignation, including <span>poor leadership, inadequate training of the incoming editor in chief, </span>unnecessary expenses incurred while attending the 2007 California College Media Association awards banquet<span>, the fostering of a “divisive and unprofessional</span>”<span>&nbsp;atmosphere,</span> and the detrimental effects of the “secretive relationship” he has with the campus editor. During his term as editor in chief, The Aggie faced another consecutive year of deficit, this time approaching $120,000. <span>See</span> ["The California Aggie Controversies"] for more information. </td> </tr> </table> </div> http://daviswiki.org/Peter_Hamilton2007-05-16 23:25:09PeterHamiltonBalanced account of and more information on the call for resignation <div id="content" class="wikipage content"> Differences for Peter Hamilton<p><strong></strong></p><table> <tr> <td> <span> Deletions are marked with - . </span> </td> <td> <span> Additions are marked with +. </span> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> Line 1: </td> <td> Line 1: </td> </tr> <tr> <td> </td> <td> <span>+ Peter is the editor in chief of ["The California Aggie"] for the 2006-07 school year. He previously served as the Science &amp; Technology editor in 2005-06.</span> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> Line 2: </td> <td> Line 3: </td> </tr> <tr> <td> <span>- Peter is the editor in chief of ["The California Aggie"] for the 2006-07 school year. He previously served as the Science &amp; Technology editor in 2005-06. Peter is also a member of the ["Theta Xi"] fraternity.<br> - <br> - In May of 2007, Peter Hamilton was asked to resign by the majority of his editors and staff (31 people) and was accused of poor leadership, an improper "relationship" with an editor that damaged the integrity of newsroom, and embezzlement of Aggie funds for a trip with said editor. He also presided over the Aggie as it operated at a nearly $120,000 deficit. See ["The California Aggie Controversies"] for more information.</span> </td> <td> <span>+ On May 15, 2007, 31 Aggie staff members, including five of the nine editorial board members, asked Peter Hamilton and the campus news editor to resign. In a letter presented publicly at a Campus Media Board meeting, the members expressed the reasons they feel warrant his resignation, including the “unfair” training of the incoming editor in chief; “unnecessary expenses incurred while attending the 2007 California College Media Association awards banquet”; the fostering of a “divisive and unprofessional” atmosphere; and the detrimental effects of the “secretive relationship” he has with the campus editor. During his term as editor in chief, The Aggie faced another consecutive year of deficit, this time approaching $120,000. More information can be found at ["The California Aggie Controversies"] for more information.</span> </td> </tr> </table> </div> http://daviswiki.org/Peter_Hamilton2007-05-16 22:46:34DavidPooleOkay, no edit war, woot, unnecessary pre-emptiveness, good spirit though right? <div id="content" class="wikipage content"> Differences for Peter Hamilton<p><strong></strong></p><table> <tr> <td> <span> Deletions are marked with - . </span> </td> <td> <span> Additions are marked with +. </span> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> Line 1: </td> <td> Line 1: </td> </tr> <tr> <td> <span>- ---&gt;''' This page is soon to become a center for drama on the wiki, it would be nice if we could all ["/talk" talk] about this page and get along.'''&lt;---</span> </td> <td> </td> </tr> </table> </div> http://daviswiki.org/Peter_Hamilton2007-05-16 22:09:44DavidPoole <div id="content" class="wikipage content"> Differences for Peter Hamilton<p><strong></strong></p><table> <tr> <td> <span> Deletions are marked with - . </span> </td> <td> <span> Additions are marked with +. </span> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> Line 1: </td> <td> Line 1: </td> </tr> <tr> <td> <span>-</span> ---&gt;''' This page is soon to become a center for drama on the wiki, it would be nice if we could all ["/talk" talk] about this page and get along.<span>&nbsp;</span>&lt;--- </td> <td> <span>+</span> ---&gt;''' This page is soon to become a center for drama on the wiki, it would be nice if we could all ["/talk" talk] about this page and get along.<span>'''</span>&lt;--- </td> </tr> </table> </div> http://daviswiki.org/Peter_Hamilton2007-05-16 22:09:25DavidPoolepre-emptive <div id="content" class="wikipage content"> Differences for Peter Hamilton<p><strong></strong></p><table> <tr> <td> <span> Deletions are marked with - . </span> </td> <td> <span> Additions are marked with +. </span> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> Line 1: </td> <td> Line 1: </td> </tr> <tr> <td> </td> <td> <span>+ ---&gt;''' This page is soon to become a center for drama on the wiki, it would be nice if we could all ["/talk" talk] about this page and get along. &lt;---<br> + </span> </td> </tr> </table> </div> http://daviswiki.org/Peter_Hamilton2007-05-16 22:07:16EdWinsRevert to version 10 (where's the libel? he was asked, he was accused. not malicious, not saying "did"). <div id="content" class="wikipage content"> Differences for Peter Hamilton<p><strong></strong></p><table> <tr> <td> <span> Deletions are marked with - . </span> </td> <td> <span> Additions are marked with +. </span> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> Line 1: </td> <td> Line 1: </td> </tr> <tr> <td> <span>- Peter is the editor in chief of ["The California Aggie"] for the 2006-07 school year. He previously served as the Science &amp; Technology editor in 2005-06.</span> </td> <td> <span>+ Peter is the editor in chief of ["The California Aggie"] for the 2006-07 school year. He previously served as the Science &amp; Technology editor in 2005-06. Peter is also a member of the ["Theta Xi"] fraternity.<br> + <br> + In May of 2007, Peter Hamilton was asked to resign by the majority of his editors and staff (31 people) and was accused of poor leadership, an improper "relationship" with an editor that damaged the integrity of newsroom, and embezzlement of Aggie funds for a trip with said editor. He also presided over the Aggie as it operated at a nearly $120,000 deficit. See ["The California Aggie Controversies"] for more information.</span> </td> </tr> </table> </div> http://daviswiki.org/Peter_Hamilton2007-05-16 22:02:26TaliaKennedyOmitted incorrect and libelous information <div id="content" class="wikipage content"> Differences for Peter Hamilton<p><strong></strong></p><table> <tr> <td> <span> Deletions are marked with - . </span> </td> <td> <span> Additions are marked with +. </span> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> Line 1: </td> <td> Line 1: </td> </tr> <tr> <td> <span>-</span> Peter is the editor in chief of ["The California Aggie"] for the 2006-07 school year. <span>&nbsp;</span>He previously served as the Science &amp; Technology editor in 2005-06. </td> <td> <span>+</span> Peter is the editor in chief of ["The California Aggie"] for the 2006-07 school year. He previously served as the Science &amp; Technology editor in 2005-06. </td> </tr> </table> </div> http://daviswiki.org/Peter_Hamilton2007-05-16 22:00:33TaliaKennedy <div id="content" class="wikipage content"> Differences for Peter Hamilton<p><strong></strong></p><table> <tr> <td> <span> Deletions are marked with - . </span> </td> <td> <span> Additions are marked with +. </span> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> Line 1: </td> <td> Line 1: </td> </tr> <tr> <td> <span>- Peter is the editor in chief of ["The California Aggie"] for the 2006-07 school year. He previously served as the Science &amp; Technology editor in 2005-06. Peter is also a member of the ["Theta Xi"] fraternity.<br> - <br> - In May of 2007, Peter Hamilton was asked to resign by the majority of his editors and staff (31 people) and was accused of poor leadership, an improper "relationship" with an editor that damaged the integrity of newsroom, and embezzlement of Aggie funds for a trip with said editor. He also presided over the Aggie as it operated at a nearly $120,000 deficit. See ["The California Aggie Controversies"] for more information.</span> </td> <td> <span>+ Peter is the editor in chief of ["The California Aggie"] for the 2006-07 school year. He previously served as the Science &amp; Technology editor in 2005-06.</span> </td> </tr> </table> </div> http://daviswiki.org/Peter_Hamilton2007-05-16 21:03:05PhilipNeustromlinked controversies page, which has more info <div id="content" class="wikipage content"> Differences for Peter Hamilton<p><strong></strong></p><table> <tr> <td> <span> Deletions are marked with - . </span> </td> <td> <span> Additions are marked with +. </span> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> Line 3: </td> <td> Line 3: </td> </tr> <tr> <td> <span>-</span> In May of 2007, Peter Hamilton was asked to resign by the majority of his editors and staff (31 people) and was accused of poor leadership, an improper "relationship" with an editor that damaged the integrity of newsroom, and embezzlement of Aggie funds for a trip with said editor. He also presided over the Aggie as it operated at a nearly $120,000 deficit. </td> <td> <span>+</span> In May of 2007, Peter Hamilton was asked to resign by the majority of his editors and staff (31 people) and was accused of poor leadership, an improper "relationship" with an editor that damaged the integrity of newsroom, and embezzlement of Aggie funds for a trip with said editor. He also presided over the Aggie as it operated at a nearly $120,000 deficit.<span>&nbsp;&nbsp;See ["The California Aggie Controversies"] for more information.</span> </td> </tr> </table> </div> http://daviswiki.org/Peter_Hamilton2007-05-16 21:00:03EdWinsRevert to version 7 (relevant to being editor in chief. ). <div id="content" class="wikipage content"> Differences for Peter Hamilton<p><strong></strong></p><table> <tr> <td> <span> Deletions are marked with - . </span> </td> <td> <span> Additions are marked with +. </span> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> Line 2: </td> <td> Line 2: </td> </tr> <tr> <td> </td> <td> <span>+ <br> + In May of 2007, Peter Hamilton was asked to resign by the majority of his editors and staff (31 people) and was accused of poor leadership, an improper "relationship" with an editor that damaged the integrity of newsroom, and embezzlement of Aggie funds for a trip with said editor. He also presided over the Aggie as it operated at a nearly $120,000 deficit.</span> </td> </tr> </table> </div> http://daviswiki.org/Peter_Hamilton2007-05-16 20:59:04MichaelSteinwandunnecessary and irrelevant information <div id="content" class="wikipage content"> Differences for Peter Hamilton<p><strong></strong></p><table> <tr> <td> <span> Deletions are marked with - . </span> </td> <td> <span> Additions are marked with +. </span> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> Line 2: </td> <td> Line 2: </td> </tr> <tr> <td> <span>- <br> - In May of 2007, Peter Hamilton was asked to resign by the majority of his editors and staff (31 people) and was accused of poor leadership, an improper "relationship" with an editor that damaged the integrity of newsroom, and embezzlement of Aggie funds for a trip with said editor. He also presided over the Aggie as it operated at a nearly $120,000 deficit.</span> </td> <td> </td> </tr> </table> </div> http://daviswiki.org/Peter_Hamilton2007-05-15 19:21:08EdWinsminor -, and readded a former. <div id="content" class="wikipage content"> Differences for Peter Hamilton<p><strong></strong></p><table> <tr> <td> <span> Deletions are marked with - . </span> </td> <td> <span> Additions are marked with +. </span> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> Line 1: </td> <td> Line 1: </td> </tr> <tr> <td> <span>- Peter is the editor in chief of ["The California Aggie"] for the 2006-07 school year. He previously served as the Science &amp; Technology editor in 2005-06.<br> - Peter Hamilton was asked to resign by the majority of his editors and staff and was accused of poor leadership, an improper "relationship" with an editor that damaged the integrity of newsroom, and embezzlement of Aggie funds for a trip with said editor. He also presided over the Aggie as it operated at a nearly $120,000 deficit.</span> </td> <td> <span>+ Peter is the editor in chief of ["The California Aggie"] for the 2006-07 school year. He previously served as the Science &amp; Technology editor in 2005-06. Peter is also a member of the ["Theta Xi"] fraternity.</span> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> Line 4: </td> <td> Line 3: </td> </tr> <tr> <td> <span>- Peter drives an unregistered, unlicensed motorcycle too fast.</span> </td> <td> <span>+ In May of 2007, Peter Hamilton was asked to resign by the majority of his editors and staff (31 people) and was accused of poor leadership, an improper "relationship" with an editor that damaged the integrity of newsroom, and embezzlement of Aggie funds for a trip with said editor. He also presided over the Aggie as it operated at a nearly $120,000 deficit.</span> </td> </tr> </table> </div> http://daviswiki.org/Peter_Hamilton2007-05-15 19:06:30AndrewPeakenews <div id="content" class="wikipage content"> Differences for Peter Hamilton<p><strong></strong></p><table> <tr> <td> <span> Deletions are marked with - . </span> </td> <td> <span> Additions are marked with +. </span> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> Line 2: </td> <td> Line 2: </td> </tr> <tr> <td> </td> <td> <span>+ Peter Hamilton was asked to resign by the majority of his editors and staff and was accused of poor leadership, an improper "relationship" with an editor that damaged the integrity of newsroom, and embezzlement of Aggie funds for a trip with said editor. He also presided over the Aggie as it operated at a nearly $120,000 deficit.</span> </td> </tr> </table> </div> http://daviswiki.org/Peter_Hamilton2006-11-15 08:13:46PhilipNeustromprev. was sci <div id="content" class="wikipage content"> Differences for Peter Hamilton<p><strong></strong></p><table> <tr> <td> <span> Deletions are marked with - . </span> </td> <td> <span> Additions are marked with +. </span> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> Line 1: </td> <td> Line 1: </td> </tr> <tr> <td> <span>-</span> Peter is the editor in chief of ["The California Aggie"] for the 2006-07 school year. </td> <td> <span>+</span> Peter is the editor in chief of ["The California Aggie"] for the 2006-07 school year.<span>&nbsp;&nbsp;He previously served as the Science &amp; Technology editor in 2005-06.</span> </td> </tr> </table> </div> http://daviswiki.org/Peter_Hamilton2006-11-15 01:20:56PeterHamilton <div id="content" class="wikipage content"> Differences for Peter Hamilton<p><strong></strong></p><table> <tr> <td> <span> Deletions are marked with - . </span> </td> <td> <span> Additions are marked with +. </span> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> Line 1: </td> <td> Line 1: </td> </tr> <tr> <td> <span>- Peter is the editor in chief of ["The California Aggie"] for the 2006-07 school year. He previously served as the Science &amp; Technology editor in 2005-06. He wonders aloud to his staff how he got the job. Peter is also a member of the ["Theta Xi"] fraternity.</span> </td> <td> <span>+ Peter is the editor in chief of ["The California Aggie"] for the 2006-07 school year.</span> </td> </tr> </table> </div> http://daviswiki.org/Peter_Hamilton2006-08-23 11:35:19ElisaHoughomitted false information <div id="content" class="wikipage content"> Differences for Peter Hamilton<p><strong></strong></p><table> <tr> <td> <span> Deletions are marked with - . </span> </td> <td> <span> Additions are marked with +. </span> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> Line 1: </td> <td> Line 1: </td> </tr> <tr> <td> <span>-</span> Peter is the editor in chief of ["The California Aggie"] for the 2006-07 school year. He previously served as the Science &amp; Technology editor in 2005-06. He wonders aloud to his staff how he got the job<span>, but he has the best intentions for the future of The Aggie</span>. Peter is also a member of the ["Theta Xi"] fraternity. </td> <td> <span>+</span> Peter is the editor in chief of ["The California Aggie"] for the 2006-07 school year. He previously served as the Science &amp; Technology editor in 2005-06. He wonders aloud to his staff how he got the job. Peter is also a member of the ["Theta Xi"] fraternity. </td> </tr> </table> </div> http://daviswiki.org/Peter_Hamilton2006-08-21 07:32:06EricKollars <div id="content" class="wikipage content"> Differences for Peter Hamilton<p><strong></strong></p><table> <tr> <td> <span> Deletions are marked with - . </span> </td> <td> <span> Additions are marked with +. </span> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> Line 1: </td> <td> Line 1: </td> </tr> <tr> <td> <span>-</span> Peter is the editor in chief of ["The California Aggie"] for the 2006-07 school year. He previously served as the Science &amp; Technology editor in 2005-06. He wonders aloud to his staff how he got the job, but he has the best intentions for the future of The Aggie. </td> <td> <span>+</span> Peter is the editor in chief of ["The California Aggie"] for the 2006-07 school year. He previously served as the Science &amp; Technology editor in 2005-06. He wonders aloud to his staff how he got the job, but he has the best intentions for the future of The Aggie.<span>&nbsp;Peter is also a member of the ["Theta Xi"] fraternity.</span> </td> </tr> </table> </div> http://daviswiki.org/Peter_Hamilton2006-08-20 16:26:33ElisaHoughcreated! <div id="content" class="wikipage content"> Differences for Peter Hamilton<p><strong></strong></p><table> <tr> <td> <span> Deletions are marked with - . </span> </td> <td> <span> Additions are marked with +. </span> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> Line 1: </td> <td> Line 1: </td> </tr> <tr> <td> </td> <td> <span>+ Peter is the editor in chief of ["The California Aggie"] for the 2006-07 school year. He previously served as the Science &amp; Technology editor in 2005-06. He wonders aloud to his staff how he got the job, but he has the best intentions for the future of The Aggie.<br> + <br> + Peter drives an unregistered, unlicensed motorcycle too fast.</span> </td> </tr> </table> </div>