Recent Changes for "SOSSS" - Davis Wikihttp://daviswiki.org/SOSSSRecent Changes of the page "SOSSS" on Davis Wiki.en-us SOSSShttp://daviswiki.org/SOSSS2011-02-13 08:08:10JasonAller <div id="content" class="wikipage content"> Differences for SOSSS<p><strong></strong></p><table> <tr> <td> <span> Deletions are marked with - . </span> </td> <td> <span> Additions are marked with +. </span> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> Line 12: </td> <td> Line 12: </td> </tr> <tr> <td> <span>-</span> #4 ["ChrisRood" Chris "Twiggie" Rood] </td> <td> <span>+</span> #4 ["Chris<span>&nbsp;</span>Rood" Chris "Twiggie" Rood] </td> </tr> <tr> <td> Line 14: </td> <td> Line 14: </td> </tr> <tr> <td> <span>-</span> Because of their over-the-top style of bold claims and accusations, the statements published in the California Aggie were edited by the ["Elections Committee"] in what has become known as the ["Election Statement Controversy"]. However, the ["Campus Judicial Board"] unanimously sided with the Orwellians, who then moved on to creating a massive ["ASUCD Elections Reform"] bill. A year and many elections bills later, the entire slate of candidates (excluding ["ChrisRood" Twiggie], who graduated), is now on the Elections Committee, and only one of the previous year's members have returned. </td> <td> <span>+</span> Because of their over-the-top style of bold claims and accusations, the statements published in the California Aggie were edited by the ["Elections Committee"] in what has become known as the ["Election Statement Controversy"]. However, the ["Campus Judicial Board"] unanimously sided with the Orwellians, who then moved on to creating a massive ["ASUCD Elections Reform"] bill. A year and many elections bills later, the entire slate of candidates (excluding ["Chris<span>&nbsp;</span>Rood" Twiggie], who graduated), is now on the Elections Committee, and only one of the previous year's members have returned. </td> </tr> </table> </div> SOSSShttp://daviswiki.org/SOSSS2008-09-28 16:38:19JasonAllerlink fix <div id="content" class="wikipage content"> Differences for SOSSS<p><strong></strong></p><table> <tr> <td> <span> Deletions are marked with - . </span> </td> <td> <span> Additions are marked with +. </span> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> Line 36: </td> <td> Line 36: </td> </tr> <tr> <td> <span>-</span> In Fall of 2004, none of the candidates were elected, though #1 candidate Jonathon Leathers was only eliminated in the last round, short [https://elections.ucdavis.edu/resultsf04/Fall%202004%20Round17.htm 42 votes]. The Orwellian slate takes this as a mandate for change, despite the fact that they actually lost. They received so many votes without getting caught cheatng that they have said, "We have political capital, and we intend to spend it." Another acheivement is that ["RevChad" Chad Van Schoelandt] received more #20 votes than any other candidate. They are planning on running in the next election. </td> <td> <span>+</span> In Fall of 2004, none of the candidates were elected, though #1 candidate Jonathon Leathers was only eliminated in the last round, short [https://elections.ucdavis.edu/resultsf04/Fall%202004%20Round17.htm 42 votes]. The Orwellian slate takes this as a mandate for change, despite the fact that they actually lost. They received so many votes without getting caught cheatng that they have said, "We have political capital, and we intend to spend it." Another acheivement is that ["<span>Users/</span>RevChad" Chad Van Schoelandt] received more #20 votes than any other candidate. They are planning on running in the next election. </td> </tr> </table> </div> SOSSShttp://daviswiki.org/SOSSS2008-08-17 18:04:49BrentLaabs(quick edit) <div id="content" class="wikipage content"> Differences for SOSSS<p><strong></strong></p><table> <tr> <td> <span> Deletions are marked with - . </span> </td> <td> <span> Additions are marked with +. </span> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> Line 12: </td> <td> Line 12: </td> </tr> <tr> <td> <span>-</span> #4 ["<span>Users/</span>ChrisRood" Chris "Twiggie" Rood] </td> <td> <span>+</span> #4 ["ChrisRood" Chris "Twiggie" Rood] </td> </tr> </table> </div> SOSSShttp://daviswiki.org/SOSSS2008-08-17 17:22:09JasonAllerlink fixes <div id="content" class="wikipage content"> Differences for SOSSS<p><strong></strong></p><table> <tr> <td> <span> Deletions are marked with - . </span> </td> <td> <span> Additions are marked with +. </span> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> Line 9: </td> <td> Line 9: </td> </tr> <tr> <td> <span>-</span> #1 ["JonathonLeathers" Jonathon Leathers]<br> <span>-</span> #2 ["RevChad" Chad Van Schoelandt]<br> <span>-</span> #3 ["MarieHuynh" Marie Huynh]<br> <span>-</span> #4 ["ChrisRood" Chris "Twiggie" Rood] </td> <td> <span>+</span> #1 ["<span>Users/</span>JonathonLeathers" Jonathon Leathers]<br> <span>+</span> #2 ["<span>Users/</span>RevChad" Chad Van Schoelandt]<br> <span>+</span> #3 ["<span>Users/</span>MarieHuynh" Marie Huynh]<br> <span>+</span> #4 ["<span>Users/</span>ChrisRood" Chris "Twiggie" Rood] </td> </tr> <tr> <td> Line 18: </td> <td> Line 18: </td> </tr> <tr> <td> <span>- </span> </td> <td> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> Line 23: </td> <td> Line 22: </td> </tr> <tr> <td> - <span>&nbsp;''You would probably have to pay George Lucas to use the name "Death Star" officially.'' - </span>["KenjiYamada"]<br> - <span>&nbsp;&nbsp;''It actually sounds like free publicity for the franchise to me.'' - </span>["BrentLaabs"]<br> - <span>&nbsp;&nbsp;''Lucas isn't big on free publicity. Or logic. You'll probably have to pay.'' - </span>["EricKlein"]<br> <span>-</span> ''Lucas is hardly the only person using the term "Death Star". Put an AT&amp;T logo on it and get AT&amp;T to pay (bonus because it resembles the Lucas Death Star, thus the nickname). If that's too edgy/commercial/legally questional, just go with "We're naming it after the excellent and educational [http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/nova/gamma/ Nova Episode]".'' -- ["JabberWokky" jw] </td> <td> <span>+ ''You would probably have to pay George Lucas to use the name "Death Star" officially.'' </span>- ["<span>Users/</span>KenjiYamada"]<br> <span>+ ''It actually sounds like free publicity for the franchise to me.'' </span>- ["<span>Users/</span>BrentLaabs"]<br> <span>+ ''Lucas isn't big on free publicity. Or logic. You'll probably have to pay.'' </span>- ["<span>Users/</span>EricKlein"]<br> <span>+</span> ''Lucas is hardly the only person using the term "Death Star". Put an AT&amp;T logo on it and get AT&amp;T to pay (bonus because it resembles the Lucas Death Star, thus the nickname). If that's too edgy/commercial/legally questional, just go with "We're naming it after the excellent and educational [http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/nova/gamma/ Nova Episode]".'' -- ["<span>Users/</span>JabberWokky" jw] </td> </tr> <tr> <td> Line 43: </td> <td> Line 42: </td> </tr> <tr> <td> <span>-</span> And remember that especially for few-winner elections like this, STV isn't especially proportional... about 1/7 of the votes will be "wasted" (N.B. this figure is only true for our specific elections, with six seat using Droop quota) . This can even happen in larger parliaments; in the 1998 Northern Ireland elections, UUP won more seats than SDLP, despite getting less of the vote.'' - ["RaghavKrishnapriyan"]<br> <span>-</span> * You are a fool if you think that we didn't do any research on this. The point of the slate was not to get all of us in. We were trying to get the most qualified of us in by concentrating the votes on one person. The rest of us were merely support. In fact, we told people NOT to vote for the rest of us as #1 but some did so anyway. Things went more or less according to plan and Jonathan was the last person to be eliminated. Sure, we ended up not getting anyone in. But what do you expect when other people cheat? - ["MarieHuynh"]<br> <span>-</span> Well, it's an interesting problem, anyway (though I'm not sure what you mean by "support"). It would probably work better if we had "above-the-line voting", as Australian Senate elections do. 95% of Australian voters vote above the line, after all. Are you going to be running anyone for President? - ["RaghavKrishnapriyan"] </td> <td> <span>+</span> And remember that especially for few-winner elections like this, STV isn't especially proportional... about 1/7 of the votes will be "wasted" (N.B. this figure is only true for our specific elections, with six seat using Droop quota) . This can even happen in larger parliaments; in the 1998 Northern Ireland elections, UUP won more seats than SDLP, despite getting less of the vote.'' - ["<span>Users/</span>RaghavKrishnapriyan"]<br> <span>+</span> * You are a fool if you think that we didn't do any research on this. The point of the slate was not to get all of us in. We were trying to get the most qualified of us in by concentrating the votes on one person. The rest of us were merely support. In fact, we told people NOT to vote for the rest of us as #1 but some did so anyway. Things went more or less according to plan and Jonathan was the last person to be eliminated. Sure, we ended up not getting anyone in. But what do you expect when other people cheat? - ["<span>Users/</span>MarieHuynh"]<br> <span>+</span> Well, it's an interesting problem, anyway (though I'm not sure what you mean by "support"). It would probably work better if we had "above-the-line voting", as Australian Senate elections do. 95% of Australian voters vote above the line, after all. Are you going to be running anyone for President? - ["<span>Users/</span>RaghavKrishnapriyan"] </td> </tr> <tr> <td> Line 47: </td> <td> Line 46: </td> </tr> <tr> <td> <span>-</span> Okay, and the ballot data is [http://ucdgreens.org/ballotdata/ available now] (thank you, Greens) and even if we eliminated the candidates accused of campaigning (Haag, Malik and Ruel) their replacements would be Manteghi, Prodigalidad and Chin (Leathers is still eliminated in the last round). I heard that Malik told students to vote for anyone in a yellow shirt though, which would taint the rest of the election results. Sucks. :-/ -["RaghavKrishnapriyan"] </td> <td> <span>+</span> Okay, and the ballot data is [http://ucdgreens.org/ballotdata/ available now] (thank you, Greens) and even if we eliminated the candidates accused of campaigning (Haag, Malik and Ruel) their replacements would be Manteghi, Prodigalidad and Chin (Leathers is still eliminated in the last round). I heard that Malik told students to vote for anyone in a yellow shirt though, which would taint the rest of the election results. Sucks. :-/ -["<span>Users/</span>RaghavKrishnapriyan"] </td> </tr> <tr> <td> Line 49: </td> <td> Line 48: </td> </tr> <tr> <td> <span>-</span> But it should be noted that there was a fourth accused Focus member: Derrick Prodigalidad. When the results were run with the current four accused removed, it gave the 3 seats to Manteghi, Chin, and Leathers from SOSSS. - ["RevChad"] </td> <td> <span>+</span> But it should be noted that there was a fourth accused Focus member: Derrick Prodigalidad. When the results were run with the current four accused removed, it gave the 3 seats to Manteghi, Chin, and Leathers from SOSSS. - ["<span>Users/</span>RevChad"] </td> </tr> </table> </div> SOSSShttp://daviswiki.org/SOSSS2007-10-11 00:38:14BrentLaabsRevert to version 39. <div id="content" class="wikipage content"> Differences for SOSSS<p><strong></strong></p><table> <tr> <td> <span> Deletions are marked with - . </span> </td> <td> <span> Additions are marked with +. </span> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> Line 1: </td> <td> Line 1: </td> </tr> <tr> <td> <span>- #redirect SOSSS Slate</span> </td> <td> <span>+ = Students for an Orwellian Student Senate Slate =<br> + <br> + The Students for an Orwellian Student Senate Slate was a ["Slate" slate] for ["ASUCD"] ["ASUCD Senate" Senate] in Fall 2004. They adopted a platform of half serious ideas and half mocking ideas -- making fun of existing slates, national politics, Governor ["Arnold Schwarzenegger" Schwarzenegger], or themselves. Most of the slate were Innerparty of ["Students for an Orwellian Society"].<br> + <br> + Though they did not get endorsed by the ["California Aggie"] during their first run, Official Candidate Leathers and Official Candidate Van Schoelandt were [http://www.californiaaggie.com/media/storage/paper981/news/2005/02/22/Opinion/Editorial.Asucd.Senate.Endorsements-1319666.shtml both endorsed] by the Aggie in their Winter 2004 Campaign as an Independent and an "["Friends Urging Campus Kindness" Urger]", respectively. It seems even ["the Aggie"] believes in [wiki:WikiPedia:Ingsoc Ingsoc] nowadays.<br> + <br> + The slate recommended voting in the following order, in an attempt to maximize the ["Choice Voting"] system and to give the impression that Big Brother was telling you how to vote:<br> + <br> + #1 ["JonathonLeathers" Jonathon Leathers]<br> + #2 ["RevChad" Chad Van Schoelandt]<br> + #3 ["MarieHuynh" Marie Huynh]<br> + #4 ["ChrisRood" Chris "Twiggie" Rood]<br> + <br> + Because of their over-the-top style of bold claims and accusations, the statements published in the California Aggie were edited by the ["Elections Committee"] in what has become known as the ["Election Statement Controversy"]. However, the ["Campus Judicial Board"] unanimously sided with the Orwellians, who then moved on to creating a massive ["ASUCD Elections Reform"] bill. A year and many elections bills later, the entire slate of candidates (excluding ["ChrisRood" Twiggie], who graduated), is now on the Elections Committee, and only one of the previous year's members have returned.<br> + <br> + ["SOSSS"] also directly spawned the ["Friends Urging Campus Kindness"], which did indeed win two seats (out of eight) in the Winter 2004 election. It seems that fortune has finally smiled on SOSSS.<br> + <br> + <br> + = Campaign Issues =<br> + <br> + They had planned to change the name of the ["Death Star"] to be officially called the Death Star and ["Kleiber Hall"] to ["Keebler Hall"] since that is what many students call it anyway. They wanted to paint a GIANT elf on the side of Keebler Hall and possibly get doubleplusmoney from the cookie people.<br> + <br> + ''You would probably have to pay George Lucas to use the name "Death Star" officially.'' - ["KenjiYamada"]<br> + ''It actually sounds like free publicity for the franchise to me.'' - ["BrentLaabs"]<br> + ''Lucas isn't big on free publicity. Or logic. You'll probably have to pay.'' - ["EricKlein"]<br> + ''Lucas is hardly the only person using the term "Death Star". Put an AT&amp;T logo on it and get AT&amp;T to pay (bonus because it resembles the Lucas Death Star, thus the nickname). If that's too edgy/commercial/legally questional, just go with "We're naming it after the excellent and educational [http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/nova/gamma/ Nova Episode]".'' -- ["JabberWokky" jw]<br> + <br> + Their Plans to deal with ["Lamargate"]:<br> + On a more serious note, the IRS is coming after UCD (no thanks to the idiots that broke the law in our name) so we would like to cut unnecessary things (i.e. $5000 for a fire truck to shoot tube socks at people, trip to mountains for senate members,etc.) and at the same time show support for groups on campus that help the community.<br> + <br> + If elected to ["ASUCD Senate" Senate], the slate promised to donate half of our senate paycheck to local charities/clubs/whatever that need the money.<br> + <br> + Their official mascot is ["Yev"], also nicknamed "[wiki:WikiPedia:Checkers_speech Checkers]". Checkers was also used as an unofficial mascot of ["Friends Urging Campus Kindness"].<br> + <br> + 3 of the 4 members of the slate are associated with ["Students for an Orwellian Society"].<br> + <br> + In Fall of 2004, none of the candidates were elected, though #1 candidate Jonathon Leathers was only eliminated in the last round, short [https://elections.ucdavis.edu/resultsf04/Fall%202004%20Round17.htm 42 votes]. The Orwellian slate takes this as a mandate for change, despite the fact that they actually lost. They received so many votes without getting caught cheatng that they have said, "We have political capital, and we intend to spend it." Another acheivement is that ["RevChad" Chad Van Schoelandt] received more #20 votes than any other candidate. They are planning on running in the next election.<br> + <br> + = Discussion =<br> + <br> + ''It looks like the SOSSS fliers that advocated voting 1. Jonathon Leathers 2. Chad Van Schoelandt 3. Marie Huynh 4. Christopher Rood weren't such a great idea, as they resulted in the latter three getting so few first-choice votes that they were [https://elections.ucdavis.edu/resultsf04/Fall%202004%20Round.htm eliminated in the first two rounds]. STV is known to reward candidates with stronger core support (read: first-choice votes). A strategy you might try next quarter is something like "If your birthday is between such and such a date, vote in this order, etc." Of course, if you spaced each of the 24 possible orders equally across the calendar year, you risk the possibility that SOSSS's support will be so diluted that ''none'' of the candidates will be elected. So play around with it a bit and strike a balance.<br> + <br> + And remember that especially for few-winner elections like this, STV isn't especially proportional... about 1/7 of the votes will be "wasted" (N.B. this figure is only true for our specific elections, with six seat using Droop quota) . This can even happen in larger parliaments; in the 1998 Northern Ireland elections, UUP won more seats than SDLP, despite getting less of the vote.'' - ["RaghavKrishnapriyan"]<br> + * You are a fool if you think that we didn't do any research on this. The point of the slate was not to get all of us in. We were trying to get the most qualified of us in by concentrating the votes on one person. The rest of us were merely support. In fact, we told people NOT to vote for the rest of us as #1 but some did so anyway. Things went more or less according to plan and Jonathan was the last person to be eliminated. Sure, we ended up not getting anyone in. But what do you expect when other people cheat? - ["MarieHuynh"]<br> + Well, it's an interesting problem, anyway (though I'm not sure what you mean by "support"). It would probably work better if we had "above-the-line voting", as Australian Senate elections do. 95% of Australian voters vote above the line, after all. Are you going to be running anyone for President? - ["RaghavKrishnapriyan"]<br> + <br> + Okay, and the ballot data is [http://ucdgreens.org/ballotdata/ available now] (thank you, Greens) and even if we eliminated the candidates accused of campaigning (Haag, Malik and Ruel) their replacements would be Manteghi, Prodigalidad and Chin (Leathers is still eliminated in the last round). I heard that Malik told students to vote for anyone in a yellow shirt though, which would taint the rest of the election results. Sucks. :-/ -["RaghavKrishnapriyan"]<br> + <br> + But it should be noted that there was a fourth accused Focus member: Derrick Prodigalidad. When the results were run with the current four accused removed, it gave the 3 seats to Manteghi, Chin, and Leathers from SOSSS. - ["RevChad"]</span> </td> </tr> </table> </div> SOSSShttp://daviswiki.org/SOSSS2007-10-11 00:33:18DavidPooleRenamed to "SOSSS Slate" <div id="content" class="wikipage content"> Differences for SOSSS<p><strong></strong></p><table> <tr> <td> <span> Deletions are marked with - . </span> </td> <td> <span> Additions are marked with +. </span> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> Line 1: </td> <td> Line 1: </td> </tr> <tr> <td> <span>- = Students for an Orwellian Student Senate Slate =<br> - <br> - The Students for an Orwellian Student Senate Slate was a ["Slate" slate] for ["ASUCD"] ["ASUCD Senate" Senate] in Fall 2004. They adopted a platform of half serious ideas and half mocking ideas -- making fun of existing slates, national politics, Governor ["Arnold Schwarzenegger" Schwarzenegger], or themselves. Most of the slate were Innerparty of ["Students for an Orwellian Society"].<br> - <br> - Though they did not get endorsed by the ["California Aggie"] during their first run, Official Candidate Leathers and Official Candidate Van Schoelandt were [http://www.californiaaggie.com/media/storage/paper981/news/2005/02/22/Opinion/Editorial.Asucd.Senate.Endorsements-1319666.shtml both endorsed] by the Aggie in their Winter 2004 Campaign as an Independent and an "["Friends Urging Campus Kindness" Urger]", respectively. It seems even ["the Aggie"] believes in [wiki:WikiPedia:Ingsoc Ingsoc] nowadays.<br> - <br> - The slate recommended voting in the following order, in an attempt to maximize the ["Choice Voting"] system and to give the impression that Big Brother was telling you how to vote:<br> - <br> - #1 ["JonathonLeathers" Jonathon Leathers]<br> - #2 ["RevChad" Chad Van Schoelandt]<br> - #3 ["MarieHuynh" Marie Huynh]<br> - #4 ["ChrisRood" Chris "Twiggie" Rood]<br> - <br> - Because of their over-the-top style of bold claims and accusations, the statements published in the California Aggie were edited by the ["Elections Committee"] in what has become known as the ["Election Statement Controversy"]. However, the ["Campus Judicial Board"] unanimously sided with the Orwellians, who then moved on to creating a massive ["ASUCD Elections Reform"] bill. A year and many elections bills later, the entire slate of candidates (excluding ["ChrisRood" Twiggie], who graduated), is now on the Elections Committee, and only one of the previous year's members have returned.<br> - <br> - ["SOSSS"] also directly spawned the ["Friends Urging Campus Kindness"], which did indeed win two seats (out of eight) in the Winter 2004 election. It seems that fortune has finally smiled on SOSSS.<br> - <br> - <br> - = Campaign Issues =<br> - <br> - They had planned to change the name of the ["Death Star"] to be officially called the Death Star and ["Kleiber Hall"] to ["Keebler Hall"] since that is what many students call it anyway. They wanted to paint a GIANT elf on the side of Keebler Hall and possibly get doubleplusmoney from the cookie people.<br> - <br> - ''You would probably have to pay George Lucas to use the name "Death Star" officially.'' - ["KenjiYamada"]<br> - ''It actually sounds like free publicity for the franchise to me.'' - ["BrentLaabs"]<br> - ''Lucas isn't big on free publicity. Or logic. You'll probably have to pay.'' - ["EricKlein"]<br> - ''Lucas is hardly the only person using the term "Death Star". Put an AT&amp;T logo on it and get AT&amp;T to pay (bonus because it resembles the Lucas Death Star, thus the nickname). If that's too edgy/commercial/legally questional, just go with "We're naming it after the excellent and educational [http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/nova/gamma/ Nova Episode]".'' -- ["JabberWokky" jw]<br> - <br> - Their Plans to deal with ["Lamargate"]:<br> - On a more serious note, the IRS is coming after UCD (no thanks to the idiots that broke the law in our name) so we would like to cut unnecessary things (i.e. $5000 for a fire truck to shoot tube socks at people, trip to mountains for senate members,etc.) and at the same time show support for groups on campus that help the community.<br> - <br> - If elected to ["ASUCD Senate" Senate], the slate promised to donate half of our senate paycheck to local charities/clubs/whatever that need the money.<br> - <br> - Their official mascot is ["Yev"], also nicknamed "[wiki:WikiPedia:Checkers_speech Checkers]". Checkers was also used as an unofficial mascot of ["Friends Urging Campus Kindness"].<br> - <br> - 3 of the 4 members of the slate are associated with ["Students for an Orwellian Society"].<br> - <br> - In Fall of 2004, none of the candidates were elected, though #1 candidate Jonathon Leathers was only eliminated in the last round, short [https://elections.ucdavis.edu/resultsf04/Fall%202004%20Round17.htm 42 votes]. The Orwellian slate takes this as a mandate for change, despite the fact that they actually lost. They received so many votes without getting caught cheatng that they have said, "We have political capital, and we intend to spend it." Another acheivement is that ["RevChad" Chad Van Schoelandt] received more #20 votes than any other candidate. They are planning on running in the next election.<br> - <br> - = Discussion =<br> - <br> - ''It looks like the SOSSS fliers that advocated voting 1. Jonathon Leathers 2. Chad Van Schoelandt 3. Marie Huynh 4. Christopher Rood weren't such a great idea, as they resulted in the latter three getting so few first-choice votes that they were [https://elections.ucdavis.edu/resultsf04/Fall%202004%20Round.htm eliminated in the first two rounds]. STV is known to reward candidates with stronger core support (read: first-choice votes). A strategy you might try next quarter is something like "If your birthday is between such and such a date, vote in this order, etc." Of course, if you spaced each of the 24 possible orders equally across the calendar year, you risk the possibility that SOSSS's support will be so diluted that ''none'' of the candidates will be elected. So play around with it a bit and strike a balance.<br> - <br> - And remember that especially for few-winner elections like this, STV isn't especially proportional... about 1/7 of the votes will be "wasted" (N.B. this figure is only true for our specific elections, with six seat using Droop quota) . This can even happen in larger parliaments; in the 1998 Northern Ireland elections, UUP won more seats than SDLP, despite getting less of the vote.'' - ["RaghavKrishnapriyan"]<br> - * You are a fool if you think that we didn't do any research on this. The point of the slate was not to get all of us in. We were trying to get the most qualified of us in by concentrating the votes on one person. The rest of us were merely support. In fact, we told people NOT to vote for the rest of us as #1 but some did so anyway. Things went more or less according to plan and Jonathan was the last person to be eliminated. Sure, we ended up not getting anyone in. But what do you expect when other people cheat? - ["MarieHuynh"]<br> - Well, it's an interesting problem, anyway (though I'm not sure what you mean by "support"). It would probably work better if we had "above-the-line voting", as Australian Senate elections do. 95% of Australian voters vote above the line, after all. Are you going to be running anyone for President? - ["RaghavKrishnapriyan"]<br> - <br> - Okay, and the ballot data is [http://ucdgreens.org/ballotdata/ available now] (thank you, Greens) and even if we eliminated the candidates accused of campaigning (Haag, Malik and Ruel) their replacements would be Manteghi, Prodigalidad and Chin (Leathers is still eliminated in the last round). I heard that Malik told students to vote for anyone in a yellow shirt though, which would taint the rest of the election results. Sucks. :-/ -["RaghavKrishnapriyan"]<br> - <br> - But it should be noted that there was a fourth accused Focus member: Derrick Prodigalidad. When the results were run with the current four accused removed, it gave the 3 seats to Manteghi, Chin, and Leathers from SOSSS. - ["RevChad"]</span> </td> <td> <span>+ #redirect SOSSS Slate</span> </td> </tr> </table> </div> SOSSShttp://daviswiki.org/SOSSS2006-07-19 20:50:01JabberWokkyThis should happen. But BRs should never happen. <div id="content" class="wikipage content"> Differences for SOSSS<p><strong></strong></p><table> <tr> <td> <span> Deletions are marked with - . </span> </td> <td> <span> Additions are marked with +. </span> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> Line 23: </td> <td> Line 23: </td> </tr> <tr> <td> <span>-</span> ''You would probably have to pay George Lucas to use the name "Death Star" officially.'' - ["KenjiYamada"]<span>[[BR]]</span><br> <span>-</span> ''It actually sounds like free publicity for the franchise to me.'' - ["BrentLaabs"]<span>[[BR]]</span> </td> <td> <span>+</span> ''You would probably have to pay George Lucas to use the name "Death Star" officially.'' - ["KenjiYamada"]<br> <span>+</span> ''It actually sounds like free publicity for the franchise to me.'' - ["BrentLaabs"] </td> </tr> </table> </div> SOSSShttp://daviswiki.org/SOSSS2006-07-09 00:11:55BrentLaabsChadVanSchoelandt -&gt; RevChad <div id="content" class="wikipage content"> Differences for SOSSS<p><strong></strong></p><table> <tr> <td> <span> Deletions are marked with - . </span> </td> <td> <span> Additions are marked with +. </span> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> Line 10: </td> <td> Line 10: </td> </tr> <tr> <td> <span>-</span> #2 ["Chad<span>VanSchoelandt</span>" Chad Van Schoelandt] </td> <td> <span>+</span> #2 ["<span>Rev</span>Chad" Chad Van Schoelandt] </td> </tr> <tr> <td> Line 37: </td> <td> Line 37: </td> </tr> <tr> <td> <span>-</span> In Fall of 2004, none of the candidates were elected, though #1 candidate Jonathon Leathers was only eliminated in the last round, short [https://elections.ucdavis.edu/resultsf04/Fall%202004%20Round17.htm 42 votes]. The Orwellian slate takes this as a mandate for change, despite the fact that they actually lost. They received so many votes without getting caught cheatng that they have said, "We have political capital, and we intend to spend it." Another acheivement is that ["ChadVanSchoelandt<span>"</span>] received more #20 votes than any other candidate. They are planning on running in the next election. </td> <td> <span>+</span> In Fall of 2004, none of the candidates were elected, though #1 candidate Jonathon Leathers was only eliminated in the last round, short [https://elections.ucdavis.edu/resultsf04/Fall%202004%20Round17.htm 42 votes]. The Orwellian slate takes this as a mandate for change, despite the fact that they actually lost. They received so many votes without getting caught cheatng that they have said, "We have political capital, and we intend to spend it." Another acheivement is that ["<span>Rev</span>Chad<span>" Chad </span>Van<span>&nbsp;</span>Schoelandt] received more #20 votes than any other candidate. They are planning on running in the next election. </td> </tr> </table> </div> SOSSShttp://daviswiki.org/SOSSS2006-06-29 00:28:42TomNelsonAggie link fixed <div id="content" class="wikipage content"> Differences for SOSSS<p><strong></strong></p><table> <tr> <td> <span> Deletions are marked with - . </span> </td> <td> <span> Additions are marked with +. </span> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> Line 5: </td> <td> Line 5: </td> </tr> <tr> <td> <span>-</span> Though they did not get endorsed by the ["California Aggie"] during their first run, Official Candidate Leathers and Official Candidate Van Schoelandt were [http://www.californiaaggie.com/<span>article/?id=7</span>6<span>79</span> both endorsed] by the Aggie in their Winter 2004 Campaign as an Independent and an "["Friends Urging Campus Kindness" Urger]", respectively. It seems even ["the Aggie"] believes in [wiki:WikiPedia:Ingsoc Ingsoc] nowadays. </td> <td> <span>+</span> Though they did not get endorsed by the ["California Aggie"] during their first run, Official Candidate Leathers and Official Candidate Van Schoelandt were [http://www.californiaaggie.com/<span>media/storage/paper981/news/2005/02/22/Opinion/Editorial.Asucd.Senate.Endorsements-1319</span>6<span>66.shtml</span> both endorsed] by the Aggie in their Winter 2004 Campaign as an Independent and an "["Friends Urging Campus Kindness" Urger]", respectively. It seems even ["the Aggie"] believes in [wiki:WikiPedia:Ingsoc Ingsoc] nowadays. </td> </tr> <tr> <td> Line 9: </td> <td> Line 9: </td> </tr> <tr> <td> <span>-</span> #1 ["JonathonLeathers" Jonathon Leathers]<span>[[BR]]</span><br> <span>-</span> #2 ["ChadVanSchoelandt" Chad Van Schoelandt]<span>[[BR]]</span><br> <span>-</span> #3 ["MarieHuynh" Marie Huynh]<span>[[BR]]</span><br> <span>-</span> #4 ["ChrisRood" Chris "Twiggie" Rood]<span>[[BR]]</span> </td> <td> <span>+</span> #1 ["JonathonLeathers" Jonathon Leathers]<br> <span>+</span> #2 ["ChadVanSchoelandt" Chad Van Schoelandt]<br> <span>+</span> #3 ["MarieHuynh" Marie Huynh]<br> <span>+</span> #4 ["ChrisRood" Chris "Twiggie" Rood] </td> </tr> <tr> <td> Line 29: </td> <td> Line 29: </td> </tr> <tr> <td> <span>-</span> On a more serious note, the IRS is coming after UCD (no thanks to the idiots that broke the law in our name) so we would like to cut unnecessary things (i.e. $5000 for a fire truck to shoot tube socks at people, trip to mountains for senate members,etc.) and at the same time show support for groups on campus that help the community.<span>&nbsp;&nbsp;</span> </td> <td> <span>+</span> On a more serious note, the IRS is coming after UCD (no thanks to the idiots that broke the law in our name) so we would like to cut unnecessary things (i.e. $5000 for a fire truck to shoot tube socks at people, trip to mountains for senate members,etc.) and at the same time show support for groups on campus that help the community. </td> </tr> </table> </div> SOSSShttp://daviswiki.org/SOSSS2006-04-22 19:27:24PaulHarmsspelling <div id="content" class="wikipage content"> Differences for SOSSS<p><strong></strong></p><table> <tr> <td> <span> Deletions are marked with - . </span> </td> <td> <span> Additions are marked with +. </span> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> Line 37: </td> <td> Line 37: </td> </tr> <tr> <td> <span>-</span> In Fall of 2004, none of the candidates were elected, though #1 candidate Jonathon Leathers was only eliminated in the last round, short [https://elections.ucdavis.edu/resultsf04/Fall%202004%20Round17.htm 42 votes]. The Orwellian slate takes this as a mandate for change, despite the fact that they actually lost. They received so many votes without getting caught cheatng that they have said, "We have political capital, and we intend to spend it." Another acheivem<span>ne</span>t is that ["ChadVanSchoelandt"] received more #20 votes than any other candidate. They are planning on running in the next election. </td> <td> <span>+</span> In Fall of 2004, none of the candidates were elected, though #1 candidate Jonathon Leathers was only eliminated in the last round, short [https://elections.ucdavis.edu/resultsf04/Fall%202004%20Round17.htm 42 votes]. The Orwellian slate takes this as a mandate for change, despite the fact that they actually lost. They received so many votes without getting caught cheatng that they have said, "We have political capital, and we intend to spend it." Another acheivem<span>en</span>t is that ["ChadVanSchoelandt"] received more #20 votes than any other candidate. They are planning on running in the next election. </td> </tr> </table> </div> SOSSShttp://daviswiki.org/SOSSS2006-04-02 17:09:47JasonAller <div id="content" class="wikipage content"> Differences for SOSSS<p><strong></strong></p><table> <tr> <td> <span> Deletions are marked with - . </span> </td> <td> <span> Additions are marked with +. </span> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> Line 3: </td> <td> Line 3: </td> </tr> <tr> <td> <span>-</span> The Students for an Orwellian Student Senate Slate was a ["Slate" slate] for ["ASUCD"] ["ASUCD Senate" Senate] in Fall 2004. They adopted a platform of half serious ideas and half mocking ideas -- making fun of existing slates, national politics, Governor Schwarzenegger, or themselves. Most of the slate were Innerparty of ["Students for an Orwellian Society"]. </td> <td> <span>+</span> The Students for an Orwellian Student Senate Slate was a ["Slate" slate] for ["ASUCD"] ["ASUCD Senate" Senate] in Fall 2004. They adopted a platform of half serious ideas and half mocking ideas -- making fun of existing slates, national politics, Governor <span>["Arnold </span>Schwarzenegger<span>" Schwarzenegger]</span>, or themselves. Most of the slate were Innerparty of ["Students for an Orwellian Society"]. </td> </tr> </table> </div> SOSSShttp://daviswiki.org/SOSSS2005-10-18 21:57:42BrentLaabsfactual inaccuracy <div id="content" class="wikipage content"> Differences for SOSSS<p><strong></strong></p><table> <tr> <td> <span> Deletions are marked with - . </span> </td> <td> <span> Additions are marked with +. </span> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> Line 14: </td> <td> Line 14: </td> </tr> <tr> <td> <span>-</span> Because of their over-the-top style of bold claims and accusations, the statements published in the California Aggie were edited by the ["Elections Committee"] in what has become known as the ["Election Statement Controversy"]. However, the ["Campus Judicial Board"] unanimously sided with the Orwellians, who then moved on to creating a massive ["ASUCD Elections Reform"] bill. A year and many elections bills later, the entire slate of candidates (excluding ["ChrisRood" Twiggie], who graduated), is now on the Elections Committee, and <span>n</span>one of the previous year's members have returned. </td> <td> <span>+</span> Because of their over-the-top style of bold claims and accusations, the statements published in the California Aggie were edited by the ["Elections Committee"] in what has become known as the ["Election Statement Controversy"]. However, the ["Campus Judicial Board"] unanimously sided with the Orwellians, who then moved on to creating a massive ["ASUCD Elections Reform"] bill. A year and many elections bills later, the entire slate of candidates (excluding ["ChrisRood" Twiggie], who graduated), is now on the Elections Committee, and <span>only </span>one of the previous year's members have returned. </td> </tr> </table> </div> SOSSShttp://daviswiki.org/SOSSS2005-10-16 18:13:31BrentLaabsall sorts of updates <div id="content" class="wikipage content"> Differences for SOSSS<p><strong></strong></p><table> <tr> <td> <span> Deletions are marked with - . </span> </td> <td> <span> Additions are marked with +. </span> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> Line 5: </td> <td> Line 5: </td> </tr> <tr> <td> <span>-</span> Though they did not get endorsed by the ["California Aggie"] during their first run, Official Candidate Leathers and Official Candidate Van Schoelandt were [http://www.californiaaggie.com/article/?id=7679 both endorsed] by the Aggie in their Winter 2004 Campaign as an Independent and an "["Friends Urging Campus Kindness" Urger]", respectively. It seems even the Aggie believes in Ingsoc nowadays. </td> <td> <span>+</span> Though they did not get endorsed by the ["California Aggie"] during their first run, Official Candidate Leathers and Official Candidate Van Schoelandt were [http://www.californiaaggie.com/article/?id=7679 both endorsed] by the Aggie in their Winter 2004 Campaign as an Independent and an "["Friends Urging Campus Kindness" Urger]", respectively. It seems even <span>["</span>the Aggie<span>"]</span> believes in <span>[wiki:WikiPedia:</span>Ingsoc <span>Ingsoc] </span>nowadays. </td> </tr> <tr> <td> Line 7: </td> <td> Line 7: </td> </tr> <tr> <td> <span>- The slate recommended voting:</span> </td> <td> <span>+ The slate recommended voting in the following order, in an attempt to maximize the ["Choice Voting"] system and to give the impression that Big Brother was telling you how to vote:</span> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> Line 9: </td> <td> Line 9: </td> </tr> <tr> <td> <span>- #1 ["JonathonLeathers"][[BR]]<br> - #2 ["ChadVanSchoelandt"][[BR]]<br> - #3 ["MarieHuynh"][[BR]]<br> - #4 ["ChrisRood"][[BR]]</span> </td> <td> <span>+ #1 ["JonathonLeathers" Jonathon Leathers][[BR]]<br> + #2 ["ChadVanSchoelandt" Chad Van Schoelandt][[BR]]<br> + #3 ["MarieHuynh" Marie Huynh][[BR]]<br> + #4 ["ChrisRood" Chris "Twiggie" Rood][[BR]]<br> + <br> + Because of their over-the-top style of bold claims and accusations, the statements published in the California Aggie were edited by the ["Elections Committee"] in what has become known as the ["Election Statement Controversy"]. However, the ["Campus Judicial Board"] unanimously sided with the Orwellians, who then moved on to creating a massive ["ASUCD Elections Reform"] bill. A year and many elections bills later, the entire slate of candidates (excluding ["ChrisRood" Twiggie], who graduated), is now on the Elections Committee, and none of the previous year's members have returned.<br> + <br> + ["SOSSS"] also directly spawned the ["Friends Urging Campus Kindness"], which did indeed win two seats (out of eight) in the Winter 2004 election. It seems that fortune has finally smiled on SOSSS.<br> + <br> + <br> + = Campaign Issues =</span> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> Line 26: </td> <td> Line 33: </td> </tr> <tr> <td> <span>-</span> Their official mascot is ["Yev"], also nicknamed "[wiki:WikiPedia:Checkers_speech Checkers]". 3 of the 4 members of the slate are associated with ["Students for an Orwellian Society"]. </td> <td> <span>+</span> Their official mascot is ["Yev"], also nicknamed "[wiki:WikiPedia:Checkers_speech Checkers]". <span>Checkers was also used as an unofficial mascot of ["Friends Urging Campus Kindness"].<br> + <br> + </span>3 of the 4 members of the slate are associated with ["Students for an Orwellian Society"]. </td> </tr> <tr> <td> Line 30: </td> <td> Line 39: </td> </tr> <tr> <td> <span>- ------</span> </td> <td> <span>+ = Discussion =</span> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> Line 40: </td> <td> Line 49: </td> </tr> <tr> <td> <span>-</span> But it should be noted that there was a fourth accused Focus member: Derrick Prodigalidad. When the results were run with the current four accused removed, it gave the 3 seats to Manteghi, Chin<span>&nbsp;</span>, and Leathers from SOSSS. - ["RevChad"] </td> <td> <span>+</span> But it should be noted that there was a fourth accused Focus member: Derrick Prodigalidad. When the results were run with the current four accused removed, it gave the 3 seats to Manteghi, Chin, and Leathers from SOSSS. - ["RevChad"] </td> </tr> </table> </div> SOSSShttp://daviswiki.org/SOSSS2005-09-27 06:12:43JabberWokky <div id="content" class="wikipage content"> Differences for SOSSS<p><strong></strong></p><table> <tr> <td> <span> Deletions are marked with - . </span> </td> <td> <span> Additions are marked with +. </span> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> Line 19: </td> <td> Line 19: </td> </tr> <tr> <td> </td> <td> <span>+ ''Lucas is hardly the only person using the term "Death Star". Put an AT&amp;T logo on it and get AT&amp;T to pay (bonus because it resembles the Lucas Death Star, thus the nickname). If that's too edgy/commercial/legally questional, just go with "We're naming it after the excellent and educational [http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/nova/gamma/ Nova Episode]".'' -- ["JabberWokky" jw]</span> </td> </tr> </table> </div> SOSSShttp://daviswiki.org/SOSSS2005-04-11 00:34:09BrentLaabsMade this page more informative. and senate link fixing, of course. <div id="content" class="wikipage content"> Differences for SOSSS<p><strong></strong></p><table> <tr> <td> <span> Deletions are marked with - . </span> </td> <td> <span> Additions are marked with +. </span> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> Line 1: </td> <td> Line 1: </td> </tr> <tr> <td> <span>- =Students for an Orwellian Student Senate Slate=<br> - (or something like that)</span> </td> <td> <span>+ = Students for an Orwellian Student Senate Slate =<br> + <br> + The Students for an Orwellian Student Senate Slate was a ["Slate" slate] for ["ASUCD"] ["ASUCD Senate" Senate] in Fall 2004. They adopted a platform of half serious ideas and half mocking ideas -- making fun of existing slates, national politics, Governor Schwarzenegger, or themselves. Most of the slate were Innerparty of ["Students for an Orwellian Society"].<br> + <br> + Though they did not get endorsed by the ["California Aggie"] during their first run, Official Candidate Leathers and Official Candidate Van Schoelandt were [http://www.californiaaggie.com/article/?id=7679 both endorsed] by the Aggie in their Winter 2004 Campaign as an Independent and an "["Friends Urging Campus Kindness" Urger]", respectively. It seems even the Aggie believes in Ingsoc nowadays.</span> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> Line 11: </td> <td> Line 14: </td> </tr> <tr> <td> <span>- Though they did not get endorsed by the Aggie during their first run, Candidate Leathers and Candidate Van Schoelandt were [http://www.californiaaggie.com/article/?id=7679 both endorsed] by the Aggie in their Winter 2004 Campaign as an Independent and an "["Friends Urging Campus Kindness" Urger]", respectively. It seems even the Aggie believes in Ingsoc nowadays.<br> - </span> </td> <td> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> Line 20: </td> <td> Line 21: </td> </tr> <tr> <td> <span>-</span> On a more serious note, the IRS is coming after UCD(no thanks to the idiots that broke the law in our name) so we would like to cut unnecessary things(i<span>e</span> $5000 for a fire truck to shoot tube socks at people, trip to mountains for senate members,etc.) and at the same time show support for groups on campus that help the community. </td> <td> <span>+</span> On a more serious note, the IRS is coming after UCD<span>&nbsp;</span>(no thanks to the idiots that broke the law in our name) so we would like to cut unnecessary things<span>&nbsp;</span>(i<span>.e.</span> $5000 for a fire truck to shoot tube socks at people, trip to mountains for senate members,etc.) and at the same time show support for groups on campus that help the community. </td> </tr> <tr> <td> Line 22: </td> <td> Line 23: </td> </tr> <tr> <td> <span>-</span> If elected to ["Senate"], the slate promised to donate half of our senate paycheck to local charities/clubs/whatever that need the money. </td> <td> <span>+</span> If elected to ["<span>ASUCD </span>Senate"<span>&nbsp;Senate</span>], the slate promised to donate half of our senate paycheck to local charities/clubs/whatever that need the money. </td> </tr> </table> </div> SOSSShttp://daviswiki.org/SOSSS2005-04-02 20:01:30ArlenAbrahamhmmm... hamsters <div id="content" class="wikipage content"> Differences for SOSSS<p><strong></strong></p><table> <tr> <td> <span> Deletions are marked with - . </span> </td> <td> <span> Additions are marked with +. </span> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> Line 24: </td> <td> Line 24: </td> </tr> <tr> <td> <span>-</span> Their official mascot is ["Yev"], also nicknamed "[<span>http://en.</span>wiki<span>p</span>edia<span>.org/wiki/</span>Checkers_speech Checkers]". 3 of the 4 members of the slate are associated with ["Students for an Orwellian Society"]. </td> <td> <span>+</span> Their official mascot is ["Yev"], also nicknamed "[wiki<span>:WikiP</span>edia<span>:</span>Checkers_speech Checkers]". 3 of the 4 members of the slate are associated with ["Students for an Orwellian Society"]. </td> </tr> </table> </div> SOSSShttp://daviswiki.org/SOSSS2005-02-22 19:58:28BrentLaabsAggie plusendorses Orwellians! Huzzah! <div id="content" class="wikipage content"> Differences for SOSSS<p><strong></strong></p><table> <tr> <td> <span> Deletions are marked with - . </span> </td> <td> <span> Additions are marked with +. </span> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> Line 10: </td> <td> Line 10: </td> </tr> <tr> <td> </td> <td> <span>+ <br> + Though they did not get endorsed by the Aggie during their first run, Candidate Leathers and Candidate Van Schoelandt were [http://www.californiaaggie.com/article/?id=7679 both endorsed] by the Aggie in their Winter 2004 Campaign as an Independent and an "["Friends Urging Campus Kindness" Urger]", respectively. It seems even the Aggie believes in Ingsoc nowadays.</span> </td> </tr> </table> </div> SOSSShttp://daviswiki.org/SOSSS2005-01-19 16:59:28JevanGrayspelling <div id="content" class="wikipage content"> Differences for SOSSS<p><strong></strong></p><table> <tr> <td> <span> Deletions are marked with - . </span> </td> <td> <span> Additions are marked with +. </span> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> Line 24: </td> <td> Line 24: </td> </tr> <tr> <td> <span>-</span> In Fall of 2004, none of the candidates were elected, though #1 candidate Jonathon Leathers was only eliminated in the last round, short [https://elections.ucdavis.edu/resultsf04/Fall%202004%20Round17.htm 42 votes]. The Orwellian slate takes this as a mandate for change, despite the fact that they actually lost. They rec<span>ie</span>ved so many votes without getting caught cheatng that they have said, "We have political capital, and we intend to spend it." Another acheivemnet is that ["ChadVanSchoelandt"] rec<span>ie</span>ved more #20 votes than any other candidate. They are planning on running in the next election. </td> <td> <span>+</span> In Fall of 2004, none of the candidates were elected, though #1 candidate Jonathon Leathers was only eliminated in the last round, short [https://elections.ucdavis.edu/resultsf04/Fall%202004%20Round17.htm 42 votes]. The Orwellian slate takes this as a mandate for change, despite the fact that they actually lost. They rec<span>ei</span>ved so many votes without getting caught cheatng that they have said, "We have political capital, and we intend to spend it." Another acheivemnet is that ["ChadVanSchoelandt"] rec<span>ei</span>ved more #20 votes than any other candidate. They are planning on running in the next election. </td> </tr> </table> </div> SOSSShttp://daviswiki.org/SOSSS2005-01-14 23:24:03RevChad <div id="content" class="wikipage content"> Differences for SOSSS<p><strong></strong></p><table> <tr> <td> <span> Deletions are marked with - . </span> </td> <td> <span> Additions are marked with +. </span> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> Line 6: </td> <td> Line 6: </td> </tr> <tr> <td> <span>-</span> #1 ["Jonathon<span>&nbsp;</span>Leathers"][[BR]] </td> <td> <span>+</span> #1 ["JonathonLeathers"][[BR]] </td> </tr> </table> </div> SOSSShttp://daviswiki.org/SOSSS2005-01-14 23:20:48RevChadLeathers link <div id="content" class="wikipage content"> Differences for SOSSS<p><strong></strong></p><table> <tr> <td> <span> Deletions are marked with - . </span> </td> <td> <span> Additions are marked with +. </span> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> Line 6: </td> <td> Line 6: </td> </tr> <tr> <td> <span>-</span> #1 Jonath<span>a</span>n Leathers[[BR]] </td> <td> <span>+</span> #1 <span>["</span>Jonath<span>o</span>n Leathers<span>"]</span>[[BR]] </td> </tr> <tr> <td> Line 28: </td> <td> Line 28: </td> </tr> <tr> <td> <span>-</span> ''It looks like the SOSSS fliers that advocated voting 1. Jonath<span>a</span>n Leathers 2. Chad Van Schoelandt 3. Marie Huynh 4. Christopher Rood weren't such a great idea, as they resulted in the latter three getting so few first-choice votes that they were [https://elections.ucdavis.edu/resultsf04/Fall%202004%20Round.htm eliminated in the first two rounds]. STV is known to reward candidates with stronger core support (read: first-choice votes). A strategy you might try next quarter is something like "If your birthday is between such and such a date, vote in this order, etc." Of course, if you spaced each of the 24 possible orders equally across the calendar year, you risk the possibility that SOSSS's support will be so diluted that ''none'' of the candidates will be elected. So play around with it a bit and strike a balance. </td> <td> <span>+</span> ''It looks like the SOSSS fliers that advocated voting 1. Jonath<span>o</span>n Leathers 2. Chad Van Schoelandt 3. Marie Huynh 4. Christopher Rood weren't such a great idea, as they resulted in the latter three getting so few first-choice votes that they were [https://elections.ucdavis.edu/resultsf04/Fall%202004%20Round.htm eliminated in the first two rounds]. STV is known to reward candidates with stronger core support (read: first-choice votes). A strategy you might try next quarter is something like "If your birthday is between such and such a date, vote in this order, etc." Of course, if you spaced each of the 24 possible orders equally across the calendar year, you risk the possibility that SOSSS's support will be so diluted that ''none'' of the candidates will be elected. So play around with it a bit and strike a balance. </td> </tr> </table> </div> SOSSShttp://daviswiki.org/SOSSS2004-12-15 18:32:08RevChad <div id="content" class="wikipage content"> Differences for SOSSS<p><strong></strong></p><table> <tr> <td> <span> Deletions are marked with - . </span> </td> <td> <span> Additions are marked with +. </span> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> Line 7: </td> <td> Line 7: </td> </tr> <tr> <td> <span>-</span> #2 ["ChadVanSchoelandt"][[BR]]<span>&nbsp;who recieved more #20 votes than any other candidate.</span> </td> <td> <span>+</span> #2 ["ChadVanSchoelandt"][[BR]] </td> </tr> <tr> <td> Line 24: </td> <td> Line 24: </td> </tr> <tr> <td> <span>-</span> In Fall of 2004, none of the candidates were elected, though #1 candidate Jonathon Leathers was only eliminated in the last round, short [https://elections.ucdavis.edu/resultsf04/Fall%202004%20Round17.htm 42 votes]. The Orwellian slate takes this as a mandate for change, despite the fact that they actually lost. They recieved so votes without getting caught cheatng that they have said, "We have political capital, and we intend to spend it." They are planning on running in the next election. </td> <td> <span>+</span> In Fall of 2004, none of the candidates were elected, though #1 candidate Jonathon Leathers was only eliminated in the last round, short [https://elections.ucdavis.edu/resultsf04/Fall%202004%20Round17.htm 42 votes]. The Orwellian slate takes this as a mandate for change, despite the fact that they actually lost. They recieved so <span>many </span>votes without getting caught cheatng that they have said, "We have political capital, and we intend to spend it." <span>Another acheivemnet is that ["ChadVanSchoelandt"] recieved more #20 votes than any other candidate. </span>They are planning on running in the next election. </td> </tr> </table> </div> SOSSShttp://daviswiki.org/SOSSS2004-12-15 18:29:12RevChad <div id="content" class="wikipage content"> Differences for SOSSS<p><strong></strong></p><table> <tr> <td> <span> Deletions are marked with - . </span> </td> <td> <span> Additions are marked with +. </span> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> Line 7: </td> <td> Line 7: </td> </tr> <tr> <td> <span>-</span> #2 ["ChadVanSchoelandt"][[BR]] </td> <td> <span>+</span> #2 ["ChadVanSchoelandt"][[BR]]<span>&nbsp;who recieved more #20 votes than any other candidate.</span> </td> </tr> </table> </div> SOSSShttp://daviswiki.org/SOSSS2004-12-03 19:50:23RevChadadded some stuff <div id="content" class="wikipage content"> Differences for SOSSS<p><strong></strong></p><table> <tr> <td> <span> Deletions are marked with - . </span> </td> <td> <span> Additions are marked with +. </span> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> Line 24: </td> <td> Line 24: </td> </tr> <tr> <td> <span>-</span> In Fall of 2004, none of the candidates were elected, though #1 candidate Jonathon Leathers was only eliminated in the last round, short [https://elections.ucdavis.edu/resultsf04/Fall%202004%20Round17.htm 42 votes]. The Orwellian slate takes this as a mandate for change, despite the fact that they actually lost. <span>&nbsp;</span>They are planning on running in the next election. </td> <td> <span>+</span> In Fall of 2004, none of the candidates were elected, though #1 candidate Jonathon Leathers was only eliminated in the last round, short [https://elections.ucdavis.edu/resultsf04/Fall%202004%20Round17.htm 42 votes]. The Orwellian slate takes this as a mandate for change, despite the fact that they actually lost. They <span>recieved so votes without getting caught cheatng that they have said, "We have political capital, and we intend to spend it." They </span>are planning on running in the next election. </td> </tr> <tr> <td> Line 35: </td> <td> Line 35: </td> </tr> <tr> <td> </td> <td> <span>+ <br> + But it should be noted that there was a fourth accused Focus member: Derrick Prodigalidad. When the results were run with the current four accused removed, it gave the 3 seats to Manteghi, Chin , and Leathers from SOSSS. - ["RevChad"]</span> </td> </tr> </table> </div> SOSSShttp://daviswiki.org/SOSSS2004-12-02 14:46:21RaghavKrishnapriyan <div id="content" class="wikipage content"> Differences for SOSSS<p><strong></strong></p><table> <tr> <td> <span> Deletions are marked with - . </span> </td> <td> <span> Additions are marked with +. </span> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> Line 34: </td> <td> Line 34: </td> </tr> <tr> <td> <span>-</span> Okay, and the ballot data is <span>&lt;a href="</span>http://ucdgreens.org/ballotdata/<span>"&gt;</span>available now<span>&lt;/a&gt;</span> (thank you, Greens) and even if we eliminated the candidates accused of campaigning (Haag, Malik and Ruel) their replacements would be Manteghi, Prodigalidad and Chin (Leathers is still eliminated in the last round). I heard that Malik told students to vote for anyone in a yellow shirt though, which would taint the rest of the election results. Sucks. :-/ -["RaghavKrishnapriyan"] </td> <td> <span>+</span> Okay, and the ballot data is <span>[</span>http://ucdgreens.org/ballotdata/<span>&nbsp;</span>available now<span>]</span> (thank you, Greens) and even if we eliminated the candidates accused of campaigning (Haag, Malik and Ruel) their replacements would be Manteghi, Prodigalidad and Chin (Leathers is still eliminated in the last round). I heard that Malik told students to vote for anyone in a yellow shirt though, which would taint the rest of the election results. Sucks. :-/ -["RaghavKrishnapriyan"] </td> </tr> </table> </div> SOSSShttp://daviswiki.org/SOSSS2004-12-02 14:45:39RaghavKrishnapriyan <div id="content" class="wikipage content"> Differences for SOSSS<p><strong></strong></p><table> <tr> <td> <span> Deletions are marked with - . </span> </td> <td> <span> Additions are marked with +. </span> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> Line 33: </td> <td> Line 33: </td> </tr> <tr> <td> </td> <td> <span>+ <br> + Okay, and the ballot data is &lt;a href="http://ucdgreens.org/ballotdata/"&gt;available now&lt;/a&gt; (thank you, Greens) and even if we eliminated the candidates accused of campaigning (Haag, Malik and Ruel) their replacements would be Manteghi, Prodigalidad and Chin (Leathers is still eliminated in the last round). I heard that Malik told students to vote for anyone in a yellow shirt though, which would taint the rest of the election results. Sucks. :-/ -["RaghavKrishnapriyan"]</span> </td> </tr> </table> </div> SOSSShttp://daviswiki.org/SOSSS2004-11-30 07:36:28RaghavKrishnapriyan <div id="content" class="wikipage content"> Differences for SOSSS<p><strong></strong></p><table> <tr> <td> <span> Deletions are marked with - . </span> </td> <td> <span> Additions are marked with +. </span> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> Line 32: </td> <td> Line 32: </td> </tr> <tr> <td> <span>- **</span>Well, it's an interesting problem, anyway (though I'm not sure what you mean by "support"). It would probably work better if we had "above-the-line voting", as Australian Senate elections do. 95% of Australian voters vote above the line, after all. Are you going to be running anyone for President? - ["RaghavKrishnapriyan"] </td> <td> <span>+ </span>Well, it's an interesting problem, anyway (though I'm not sure what you mean by "support"). It would probably work better if we had "above-the-line voting", as Australian Senate elections do. 95% of Australian voters vote above the line, after all. Are you going to be running anyone for President? - ["RaghavKrishnapriyan"] </td> </tr> </table> </div> SOSSShttp://daviswiki.org/SOSSS2004-11-30 07:35:39RaghavKrishnapriyan <div id="content" class="wikipage content"> Differences for SOSSS<p><strong></strong></p><table> <tr> <td> <span> Deletions are marked with - . </span> </td> <td> <span> Additions are marked with +. </span> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> Line 32: </td> <td> Line 32: </td> </tr> <tr> <td> </td> <td> <span>+ **Well, it's an interesting problem, anyway (though I'm not sure what you mean by "support"). It would probably work better if we had "above-the-line voting", as Australian Senate elections do. 95% of Australian voters vote above the line, after all. Are you going to be running anyone for President? - ["RaghavKrishnapriyan"]</span> </td> </tr> </table> </div> SOSSShttp://daviswiki.org/SOSSS2004-11-29 23:01:23MarieHuynh <div id="content" class="wikipage content"> Differences for SOSSS<p><strong></strong></p><table> <tr> <td> <span> Deletions are marked with - . </span> </td> <td> <span> Additions are marked with +. </span> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> Line 31: </td> <td> Line 31: </td> </tr> <tr> <td> </td> <td> <span>+ * You are a fool if you think that we didn't do any research on this. The point of the slate was not to get all of us in. We were trying to get the most qualified of us in by concentrating the votes on one person. The rest of us were merely support. In fact, we told people NOT to vote for the rest of us as #1 but some did so anyway. Things went more or less according to plan and Jonathan was the last person to be eliminated. Sure, we ended up not getting anyone in. But what do you expect when other people cheat? - ["MarieHuynh"]</span> </td> </tr> </table> </div> SOSSShttp://daviswiki.org/SOSSS2004-11-26 22:47:38PhilipNeustromreworded for post-lost election, also made voice a bit different <div id="content" class="wikipage content"> Differences for SOSSS<p><strong></strong></p><table> <tr> <td> <span> Deletions are marked with - . </span> </td> <td> <span> Additions are marked with +. </span> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> Line 3: </td> <td> Line 3: </td> </tr> <tr> <td> </td> <td> <span>+ <br> + The slate recommended voting:</span> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> Line 9: </td> <td> Line 11: </td> </tr> <tr> <td> <span>- We plan</span> to change the name of the ["Death Star"] to be officially called the Death Star and ["Kleiber Hall"] to ["Keebler Hall"] since that is what many students call it anyway. <span>We</span> want to paint a GIANT elf on the side of Keebler Hall and possibly get doubleplusmoney from the cookie people. </td> <td> <span>+ They had planned</span> to change the name of the ["Death Star"] to be officially called the Death Star and ["Kleiber Hall"] to ["Keebler Hall"] since that is what many students call it anyway. <span>They</span> want<span>ed</span> to paint a GIANT elf on the side of Keebler Hall and possibly get doubleplusmoney from the cookie people. </td> </tr> <tr> <td> Line 11: </td> <td> Line 13: </td> </tr> <tr> <td> <span>-</span> ''You would probably have to pay George Lucas to use the name "Death Star" officially.'' - ["KenjiYamada"][[BR]]<br> <span>-</span> ''It actually sounds like free publicity for the franchise to me.'' - ["BrentLaabs"][[BR]]<br> - <span>''Lucas isn't big on free publicity. Or logic. You'll probably have to pay.'' - </span>["EricKlein"] </td> <td> <span>+ </span> ''You would probably have to pay George Lucas to use the name "Death Star" officially.'' - ["KenjiYamada"][[BR]]<br> <span>+ </span> ''It actually sounds like free publicity for the franchise to me.'' - ["BrentLaabs"][[BR]]<br> <span>+ ''Lucas isn't big on free publicity. Or logic. You'll probably have to pay.'' </span>- ["EricKlein"] </td> </tr> <tr> <td> Line 15: </td> <td> Line 17: </td> </tr> <tr> <td> <span>-</span> Plans to deal with ["Lamargate"]:<br> <span>-</span> On a more serious note, the IRS is coming after UCD(no thanks to the idiots that broke the law in our name) so we would like to cut unnecessary things(ie $5000 for a fire truck to shoot tube socks at people, trip to mountains for senate members,etc.) and at the same time show support for groups on campus that help the community. </td> <td> <span>+ Their</span> Plans to deal with ["Lamargate"]:<br> <span>+ </span> On a more serious note, the IRS is coming after UCD(no thanks to the idiots that broke the law in our name) so we would like to cut unnecessary things(ie $5000 for a fire truck to shoot tube socks at people, trip to mountains for senate members,etc.) and at the same time show support for groups on campus that help the community. </td> </tr> <tr> <td> Line 18: </td> <td> Line 20: </td> </tr> <tr> <td> <span>-</span> If elected to ["Senate"], <span>our</span> slate promise<span>s</span> to donate half of our senate paycheck to local charities/clubs/whatever that need the money. </td> <td> <span>+</span> If elected to ["Senate"], <span>the</span> slate promise<span>d</span> to donate half of our senate paycheck to local charities/clubs/whatever that need the money. </td> </tr> <tr> <td> Line 20: </td> <td> Line 22: </td> </tr> <tr> <td> <span>- <br> - Ou</span>r official mascot is ["Yev"], also nicknamed "[http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Checkers_speech Checkers]". 3 of the 4 members of the slate are associated with ["Students for an Orwellian Society"]. </td> <td> <span>+ Thei</span>r official mascot is ["Yev"], also nicknamed "[http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Checkers_speech Checkers]". 3 of the 4 members of the slate are associated with ["Students for an Orwellian Society"]. </td> </tr> </table> </div> SOSSShttp://daviswiki.org/SOSSS2004-11-26 11:01:03RaghavKrishnapriyan <div id="content" class="wikipage content"> Differences for SOSSS<p><strong></strong></p><table> <tr> <td> <span> Deletions are marked with - . </span> </td> <td> <span> Additions are marked with +. </span> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> Line 29: </td> <td> Line 29: </td> </tr> <tr> <td> <span>-</span> And remember that especially for few-winner elections like this, STV isn't especially proportional... about 1/7 of the votes will be "wasted". This can even happen in larger parliaments; in the 1998 Northern Ireland elections, UUP won more seats than SDLP, despite getting less of the vote.'' - ["RaghavKrishnapriyan"] </td> <td> <span>+</span> And remember that especially for few-winner elections like this, STV isn't especially proportional... about 1/7 of the votes will be "wasted"<span>&nbsp;(N.B. this figure is only true for our specific elections, with six seat using Droop quota) </span>. This can even happen in larger parliaments; in the 1998 Northern Ireland elections, UUP won more seats than SDLP, despite getting less of the vote.'' - ["RaghavKrishnapriyan"] </td> </tr> </table> </div> SOSSShttp://daviswiki.org/SOSSS2004-11-26 00:30:39RaghavKrishnapriyan <div id="content" class="wikipage content"> Differences for SOSSS<p><strong></strong></p><table> <tr> <td> <span> Deletions are marked with - . </span> </td> <td> <span> Additions are marked with +. </span> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> Line 24: </td> <td> Line 24: </td> </tr> <tr> <td> </td> <td> <span>+ <br> + ------<br> + <br> + ''It looks like the SOSSS fliers that advocated voting 1. Jonathan Leathers 2. Chad Van Schoelandt 3. Marie Huynh 4. Christopher Rood weren't such a great idea, as they resulted in the latter three getting so few first-choice votes that they were [https://elections.ucdavis.edu/resultsf04/Fall%202004%20Round.htm eliminated in the first two rounds]. STV is known to reward candidates with stronger core support (read: first-choice votes). A strategy you might try next quarter is something like "If your birthday is between such and such a date, vote in this order, etc." Of course, if you spaced each of the 24 possible orders equally across the calendar year, you risk the possibility that SOSSS's support will be so diluted that ''none'' of the candidates will be elected. So play around with it a bit and strike a balance.<br> + <br> + And remember that especially for few-winner elections like this, STV isn't especially proportional... about 1/7 of the votes will be "wasted". This can even happen in larger parliaments; in the 1998 Northern Ireland elections, UUP won more seats than SDLP, despite getting less of the vote.'' - ["RaghavKrishnapriyan"]</span> </td> </tr> </table> </div> SOSSShttp://daviswiki.org/SOSSS2004-11-19 15:38:09EricKlein <div id="content" class="wikipage content"> Differences for SOSSS<p><strong></strong></p><table> <tr> <td> <span> Deletions are marked with - . </span> </td> <td> <span> Additions are marked with +. </span> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> Line 12: </td> <td> Line 12: </td> </tr> <tr> <td> <span>-</span> ''It actually sounds like free publicity for the franchise to me.'' - ["BrentLaabs"] </td> <td> <span>+</span> ''It actually sounds like free publicity for the franchise to me.'' - ["BrentLaabs"]<span>[[BR]]</span> </td> </tr> </table> </div> SOSSShttp://daviswiki.org/SOSSS2004-11-19 15:37:41EricKlein <div id="content" class="wikipage content"> Differences for SOSSS<p><strong></strong></p><table> <tr> <td> <span> Deletions are marked with - . </span> </td> <td> <span> Additions are marked with +. </span> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> Line 13: </td> <td> Line 13: </td> </tr> <tr> <td> </td> <td> <span>+ ''Lucas isn't big on free publicity. Or logic. You'll probably have to pay.'' - ["EricKlein"]</span> </td> </tr> </table> </div> SOSSShttp://daviswiki.org/SOSSS2004-11-19 15:21:54BrentLaabsupdated for after the election <div id="content" class="wikipage content"> Differences for SOSSS<p><strong></strong></p><table> <tr> <td> <span> Deletions are marked with - . </span> </td> <td> <span> Additions are marked with +. </span> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> Line 4: </td> <td> Line 4: </td> </tr> <tr> <td> <span>-</span> #1 Jonathan Leathers<br> <span>-</span> #2 ["ChadVanSchoelandt"]<br> <span>-</span> #3 ["MarieHuynh"]<br> <span>-</span> #4 ["ChrisRood"] </td> <td> <span>+</span> #1 Jonathan Leathers<span>[[BR]]</span><br> <span>+</span> #2 ["ChadVanSchoelandt"]<span>[[BR]]</span><br> <span>+</span> #3 ["MarieHuynh"]<span>[[BR]]</span><br> <span>+</span> #4 ["ChrisRood"]<span>[[BR]]</span> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> Line 9: </td> <td> Line 9: </td> </tr> <tr> <td> <span>-</span> We plan to change the name of the ["Death Star"] to be officially called the Death Star and ["Kleiber Hall"] to ["Keebler Hall"] since that is what many students call it anyway. We want to paint a GIANT elf on the side of Keebler Hall and possibly get <span>$</span> from the cookie people. </td> <td> <span>+</span> We plan to change the name of the ["Death Star"] to be officially called the Death Star and ["Kleiber Hall"] to ["Keebler Hall"] since that is what many students call it anyway. We want to paint a GIANT elf on the side of Keebler Hall and possibly get <span>doubleplusmoney</span> from the cookie people. </td> </tr> <tr> <td> Line 11: </td> <td> Line 11: </td> </tr> <tr> <td> <span>- ''You would probably have to pay George Lucas to use the name "Death Star" officially.'' - ["KenjiYamada"]</span> </td> <td> <span>+ ''You would probably have to pay George Lucas to use the name "Death Star" officially.'' - ["KenjiYamada"][[BR]]<br> + ''It actually sounds like free publicity for the franchise to me.'' - ["BrentLaabs"]</span> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> Line 19: </td> <td> Line 20: </td> </tr> <tr> <td> <span>- Our official mascot is ["Yev"]. 3 of the 4 members of the slate are associated with ["Students for an Orwellian Society"].</span> </td> <td> <span>+ Our official mascot is ["Yev"], also nicknamed "[http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Checkers_speech Checkers]". 3 of the 4 members of the slate are associated with ["Students for an Orwellian Society"].<br> + <br> + In Fall of 2004, none of the candidates were elected, though #1 candidate Jonathon Leathers was only eliminated in the last round, short [https://elections.ucdavis.edu/resultsf04/Fall%202004%20Round17.htm 42 votes]. The Orwellian slate takes this as a mandate for change, despite the fact that they actually lost. They are planning on running in the next election.</span> </td> </tr> </table> </div> SOSSShttp://daviswiki.org/SOSSS2004-11-16 16:42:32KenjiYamada <div id="content" class="wikipage content"> Differences for SOSSS<p><strong></strong></p><table> <tr> <td> <span> Deletions are marked with - . </span> </td> <td> <span> Additions are marked with +. </span> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> Line 11: </td> <td> Line 11: </td> </tr> <tr> <td> </td> <td> <span>+ ''You would probably have to pay George Lucas to use the name "Death Star" officially.'' - ["KenjiYamada"]<br> + </span> </td> </tr> </table> </div> SOSSShttp://daviswiki.org/SOSSS2004-11-16 12:32:00PhilipNeustrom <div id="content" class="wikipage content"> Differences for SOSSS<p><strong></strong></p><table> <tr> <td> <span> Deletions are marked with - . </span> </td> <td> <span> Additions are marked with +. </span> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> Line 17: </td> <td> Line 17: </td> </tr> <tr> <td> <span>- Our official mascot is ["Yev"].</span> </td> <td> <span>+ Our official mascot is ["Yev"]. 3 of the 4 members of the slate are associated with ["Students for an Orwellian Society"].</span> </td> </tr> </table> </div> SOSSShttp://daviswiki.org/SOSSS2004-11-11 18:32:26MarieHuynh <div id="content" class="wikipage content"> Differences for SOSSS<p><strong></strong></p><table> <tr> <td> <span> Deletions are marked with - . </span> </td> <td> <span> Additions are marked with +. </span> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> Line 5: </td> <td> Line 5: </td> </tr> <tr> <td> <span>-</span> #2 ["Chad<span>&nbsp;</span>VanSchoelandt"] </td> <td> <span>+</span> #2 ["ChadVanSchoelandt"] </td> </tr> </table> </div> SOSSShttp://daviswiki.org/SOSSS2004-11-11 18:22:01MarieHuynh <div id="content" class="wikipage content"> Differences for SOSSS<p><strong></strong></p><table> <tr> <td> <span> Deletions are marked with - . </span> </td> <td> <span> Additions are marked with +. </span> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> Line 14: </td> <td> Line 14: </td> </tr> <tr> <td> <span>-</span> If elected to ["<span>s</span>enate"], our slate promises to donate half of our senate paycheck to local charities/clubs/whatever that need the money. </td> <td> <span>+</span> If elected to ["<span>S</span>enate"], our slate promises to donate half of our senate paycheck to local charities/clubs/whatever that need the money. </td> </tr> </table> </div> SOSSShttp://daviswiki.org/SOSSS2004-11-11 18:21:44MarieHuynh <div id="content" class="wikipage content"> Differences for SOSSS<p><strong></strong></p><table> <tr> <td> <span> Deletions are marked with - . </span> </td> <td> <span> Additions are marked with +. </span> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> Line 14: </td> <td> Line 14: </td> </tr> <tr> <td> <span>-</span> If elected to senate, our slate promises to donate half of our senate paycheck to local charities/clubs/whatever that need the money. </td> <td> <span>+</span> If elected to <span>["</span>senate<span>"]</span>, our slate promises to donate half of our senate paycheck to local charities/clubs/whatever that need the money. </td> </tr> </table> </div> SOSSShttp://daviswiki.org/SOSSS2004-11-11 18:19:17MarieHuynh <div id="content" class="wikipage content"> Differences for SOSSS<p><strong></strong></p><table> <tr> <td> <span> Deletions are marked with - . </span> </td> <td> <span> Additions are marked with +. </span> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> Line 12: </td> <td> Line 12: </td> </tr> <tr> <td> <span>-</span> On a more serious note, the IRS is coming after UCD(no thanks to the idiots that broke the law in our name) so we would like to cut unnecessary things(ie $5000 for a fire truck to shoot tube socks at people, trip to mountains for senate members,etc.) and at the same time show support for groups on campus that help the community. If elected to senate, our slate promises to donate half of our senate paycheck to local charities/clubs/whatever that need the money. </td> <td> <span>+</span> On a more serious note, the IRS is coming after UCD(no thanks to the idiots that broke the law in our name) so we would like to cut unnecessary things(ie $5000 for a fire truck to shoot tube socks at people, trip to mountains for senate members,etc.) and at the same time show support for groups on campus that help the community. <span><br> + <br> + </span>If elected to senate, our slate promises to donate half of our senate paycheck to local charities/clubs/whatever that need the money. </td> </tr> </table> </div> SOSSShttp://daviswiki.org/SOSSS2004-11-10 20:40:33MarieHuynh <div id="content" class="wikipage content"> Differences for SOSSS<p><strong></strong></p><table> <tr> <td> <span> Deletions are marked with - . </span> </td> <td> <span> Additions are marked with +. </span> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> Line 3: </td> <td> Line 3: </td> </tr> <tr> <td> </td> <td> <span>+ <br> + #1 Jonathan Leathers<br> + #2 ["Chad VanSchoelandt"]<br> + #3 ["MarieHuynh"]<br> + #4 ["ChrisRood"]</span> </td> </tr> </table> </div> SOSSShttp://daviswiki.org/SOSSS2004-11-10 00:11:35MarieHuynh <div id="content" class="wikipage content"> Differences for SOSSS<p><strong></strong></p><table> <tr> <td> <span> Deletions are marked with - . </span> </td> <td> <span> Additions are marked with +. </span> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> Line 6: </td> <td> Line 6: </td> </tr> <tr> <td> </td> <td> <span>+ Plans to deal with ["Lamargate"]:</span> </td> </tr> </table> </div> SOSSShttp://daviswiki.org/SOSSS2004-11-09 20:53:12MarieHuynh <div id="content" class="wikipage content"> Differences for SOSSS<p><strong></strong></p><table> <tr> <td> <span> Deletions are marked with - . </span> </td> <td> <span> Additions are marked with +. </span> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> Line 7: </td> <td> Line 7: </td> </tr> <tr> <td> </td> <td> <span>+ <br> + <br> + Our official mascot is ["Yev"].</span> </td> </tr> </table> </div> SOSSShttp://daviswiki.org/SOSSS2004-11-09 20:51:52MarieHuynh <div id="content" class="wikipage content"> Differences for SOSSS<p><strong></strong></p><table> <tr> <td> <span> Deletions are marked with - . </span> </td> <td> <span> Additions are marked with +. </span> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> Line 6: </td> <td> Line 6: </td> </tr> <tr> <td> <span>-</span> On a more serious note, the IRS is coming after UCD(no thanks to the idiots that broke the law in our name) so we would like to cut unnecessary things(ie $5000 for a fire truck to shoot tube socks at people, trip to mountains for senate members,etc.) and at the same time show support for groups on campus that help the community. If elected to senate, our slate promises to donate half of our senate paycheck to local charities/clubs/whatever. </td> <td> <span>+</span> On a more serious note, the IRS is coming after UCD(no thanks to the idiots that broke the law in our name) so we would like to cut unnecessary things(ie $5000 for a fire truck to shoot tube socks at people, trip to mountains for senate members,etc.) and at the same time show support for groups on campus that help the community. If elected to senate, our slate promises to donate half of our senate paycheck to local charities/clubs/whatever<span>&nbsp;that need the money</span>. </td> </tr> </table> </div> SOSSShttp://daviswiki.org/SOSSS2004-11-09 20:50:43MarieHuynh <div id="content" class="wikipage content"> Differences for SOSSS<p><strong></strong></p><table> <tr> <td> <span> Deletions are marked with - . </span> </td> <td> <span> Additions are marked with +. </span> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> Line 1: </td> <td> Line 1: </td> </tr> <tr> <td> </td> <td> <span>+ =Students for an Orwellian Student Senate Slate=<br> + (or something like that)<br> + <br> + We plan to change the name of the ["Death Star"] to be officially called the Death Star and ["Kleiber Hall"] to ["Keebler Hall"] since that is what many students call it anyway. We want to paint a GIANT elf on the side of Keebler Hall and possibly get $ from the cookie people.<br> + <br> + On a more serious note, the IRS is coming after UCD(no thanks to the idiots that broke the law in our name) so we would like to cut unnecessary things(ie $5000 for a fire truck to shoot tube socks at people, trip to mountains for senate members,etc.) and at the same time show support for groups on campus that help the community. If elected to senate, our slate promises to donate half of our senate paycheck to local charities/clubs/whatever.</span> </td> </tr> </table> </div>