Recent Changes for "Shadiness Factor" - Davis Wiki

Shadiness Factor

bGul — 2009-05-11 18:13:13

Comment added.

Differences for Shadiness Factor

Deletions are marked with - .	Additions are marked with +.
Line 169:	Line 169:
	+ ------ + ''2009-05-11 19:13:13'' [[nbsp]] Something that is indubitably shady is the death of Hunter S. Thompson, for those who prefer the gozo sort of life. Check out the details: + Alleged that he knew something about 9-11 and that 'they' would probably kill him and make it appear as a suicide, the firearm, though being semiautomatic did not have a bullet in the chamber, Hunter's son in the next room said he heard what sounded like a book falling (which could have been the result of a silencer) and lastly, there was misinformation given by the authorities as to the crime scene. + --["Users/bGul"]

Shadiness Factor

WilliamLewis — 2008-12-29 13:06:00

c4 is pretty shady

Differences for Shadiness Factor

Deletions are marked with - .	Additions are marked with +.
Line 15:	Line 15:
- 8. ["Campaigning in Dorms Controversy"], advertising via sticking ads on bikes (stop this abomination now). ["AT&T"] murdering the talking clock. ["Fischer, Carrillo & Associates"] advertising services via spam. Websites like ["ucdavis.collegewikis.com"]	+ 8. ["Campaigning in Dorms Controversy"], advertising via sticking ads on bikes (stop this abomination now). ["AT&T"] murdering the talking clock. ["Fischer, Carrillo & Associates"] advertising services via spam. Websites like ["ucdavis.collegewikis.com"]. The ["Campus Crusade for Chaos and Confusion"] ["Cactuar Sign" covering up traffic signs with fliers]

Shadiness Factor

JasonAller — 2008-12-21 14:44:15

(quick edit)

Differences for Shadiness Factor

Deletions are marked with - .	Additions are marked with +.
Line 15:	Line 15:
- 8. ["Campaigning in Dorms Controversy"], advertising via sticking ads on bikes (stop this abomination now). ["AT&T"] murdering the talking clock. ["Fischer, Carrillo & Associates"] advertising services via spam.	+ 8. ["Campaigning in Dorms Controversy"], advertising via sticking ads on bikes (stop this abomination now). ["AT&T"] murdering the talking clock. ["Fischer, Carrillo & Associates"] advertising services via spam. Websites like ["ucdavis.collegewikis.com"]

Shadiness Factor

NickSchmalenberger — 2008-10-01 01:18:20

(quick edit)

Differences for Shadiness Factor

Deletions are marked with - .	Additions are marked with +.
Line 15:	Line 15:
- 8. ["Campaigning in Dorms Controversy"], advertising via sticking ads on bikes (stop this abomination now). AT&T murdering the talking clock. ["Fischer, Carrillo & Associates"] advertising services via spam.	+ 8. ["Campaigning in Dorms Controversy"], advertising via sticking ads on bikes (stop this abomination now). ["AT&T"] murdering the talking clock. ["Fischer, Carrillo & Associates"] advertising services via spam.

Shadiness Factor

NickSchmalenberger — 2008-10-01 01:16:38

(quick edit)

Differences for Shadiness Factor

Deletions are marked with - .	Additions are marked with +.
Line 15:	Line 15:
- 8. ["Campaigning in Dorms Controversy"], advertising via sticking ads on bikes (stop this abomination now). AT&T discontinuing the talking clock. ["Fischer, Carrillo & Associates"] advertising services via spam.	+ 8. ["Campaigning in Dorms Controversy"], advertising via sticking ads on bikes (stop this abomination now). AT&T murdering the talking clock. ["Fischer, Carrillo & Associates"] advertising services via spam.

Shadiness Factor

WilliamLewis — 2008-09-30 20:59:22

Nick thinks that this is shady and I agree!

Differences for Shadiness Factor

Deletions are marked with - .	Additions are marked with +.
Line 15:	Line 15:
- 8. ["Campaigning in Dorms Controversy"], advertising via sticking ads on bikes (stop this abomination now). ["Fischer, Carrillo & Associates"] advertising services via spam.	+ 8. ["Campaigning in Dorms Controversy"], advertising via sticking ads on bikes (stop this abomination now). AT&T discontinuing the talking clock. ["Fischer, Carrillo & Associates"] advertising services via spam.

Shadiness Factor

JasonAller — 2008-09-13 09:28:02

link fixes

Differences for Shadiness Factor

Deletions are marked with - .	Additions are marked with +.
Line 20:	Line 20:
- ["AshleyOrsaba"] has a different idea of what is shady.	+ ["Users/AshleyOrsaba"] has a different idea of what is shady.

Shadiness Factor

WilliamLewis — 2008-08-25 16:36:18

Fiiine

Differences for Shadiness Factor

Deletions are marked with - .	Additions are marked with +.
Line 9:	Line 9:
- 2. Religious Fraternities (ie. ["Alpha Gamma Omega" AGO] and ["Alpha Epsilon Pi" AEPi]), People who discriminate against religious beliefs, ["Davis411"].com.	+ 2. Religious Fraternities (ie. ["Alpha Gamma Omega" AGO] and ["Alpha Epsilon Pi" AEPi]), People who discriminate against religious beliefs, ["Davis411"].com, ["Davis Police Department"].

Shadiness Factor

JasonAller — 2008-08-25 16:34:58

removed link to Tom Waltz as he isn't shady

Differences for Shadiness Factor

Deletions are marked with - .	Additions are marked with +.
Line 9:	Line 9:
- 2. Religious Fraternities (ie. ["Alpha Gamma Omega" AGO] and ["Alpha Epsilon Pi" AEPi]), People who discriminate against religious beliefs, ["Davis411"].com, ["Tom Waltz"].	+ 2. Religious Fraternities (ie. ["Alpha Gamma Omega" AGO] and ["Alpha Epsilon Pi" AEPi]), People who discriminate against religious beliefs, ["Davis411"].com.

Shadiness Factor

BrentLaabs — 2008-08-24 20:52:10

all of you people should have known better. flipped waltz and LJdrama in rank

Differences for Shadiness Factor

Deletions are marked with - .	Additions are marked with +.
Line 9:	Line 9:
- 2. Religious Fraternities (ie. ["Alpha Gamma Omega" AGO] and ["Alpha Epsilon Pi" AEPi]), People who discriminate against religious beliefs, ["Davis411"].com, [http://www.ljdrama.org/ LiveJournal drama]. - 3. ["Lamargate"], ["Tom Waltz"], ["Students for an Orwellian Society"].	+ 2. Religious Fraternities (ie. ["Alpha Gamma Omega" AGO] and ["Alpha Epsilon Pi" AEPi]), People who discriminate against religious beliefs, ["Davis411"].com, ["Tom Waltz"]. + 3. ["Lamargate"], [http://www.ljdrama.org/ LiveJournal drama], ["Students for an Orwellian Society"].
Line 106:	Line 106:
- ''2005-03-21 22:51:57'' [[nbsp]] how is Students for an Orwellian Society on equal shadiness as lamargate or midgetcop? --["Users/MarieHuynh"] - ------ - ''2005-03-21 22:59:19'' [[nbsp]] I would say Lamargate is far more shady than either of those two...and I don't know why the midget cop is shady at all --["Users/GeorgeLewis"] - ------ - ''2005-03-21 23:03:43'' [[nbsp]] Yeah I was wondering about the midget cop too, but then I remembered -- he allegedly couldn't pass the physical requirements for the police force (being a midget and all), so he sued them -- pursuant to the lawsuit they allowed him to become a police officer. Equal opportunity for the handicapped is all good and well but the police and fire departments have physical standards for a reason, and its NOT to persecute the vertically challenged! --["Users/KrisFricke"] - ------ - ''2005-03-21 23:17:12'' [[nbsp]] I've saw him take down two football players outside of Cantina about two years ago....I dont think any of us could do that --["Users/JimSchwab"] - ------ - ''2005-03-21 23:25:39'' [[nbsp]] I'm sure the man is in shape and I bet he puts a lot of effort into maintaining optimum fitness (possibly feeling he needs to prove himself -- napoleon complex?) -- but what I heard was that he couldn't do certain things -- I dunno maybe he had to jump over something or something -- and he was unable. I dunno I'm just saying that thats the creation myth I heard for his commission, if its not true than there's nothing shady. Also I want to disclaim that I by no means mean to sound patronizing of his condition here, its admirable that he won't let his physical handicap prevent him from doing what he wants and from what I hear he does a good job. --["Users/KrisFricke"] - ------ - ''2005-03-21 23:31:24'' [[nbsp]] I had heard that he was no longer in Davis. Is this not true? --["Users/GeorgeLewis"] - ------ - ''2005-03-22 00:01:54'' [[nbsp]] I saw him driving a patrol car last week. --["Users/JimSchwab"] - ------
Line 123:	Line 109:
- ------ - ''2005-08-29 14:57:45'' [[nbsp]] I don't think the Midget Cop is shady at all. One of my friends met him and said that he was very nice and absolutely NOT shady. --["Users/AllisonEriksen"]

Shadiness Factor

JasonAller — 2008-08-23 13:15:17

link fixes

Differences for Shadiness Factor

Deletions are marked with - .	Additions are marked with +.
Line 23:	Line 23:
	+ + ''2005-02-16 15:30:29'' [[nbsp]] I think this is hilarious. I'd love to start rating other pages. Just out of curiosity, what shadiness rating does ["Students for an Orwellian Society"] get? --["Users/BrentLaabs"]
Line 24:	Line 26:
- ''2005-02-16 15:30:29'' [[nbsp]] I think this is hilarious. I'd love to start rating other pages. Just out of curiosity, what shadiness rating does ["Students for an Orwellian Society"] get? --["BrentLaabs"]	+ ''2005-02-16 21:31:04'' [[nbsp]] I think Students for an Orwellian Society are well beyond shady. We need to invent a whole new concept of shady for them :) --["Users/BryanBell"]
Line 26:	Line 28:
- ''2005-02-16 21:31:04'' [[nbsp]] I think Students for an Orwellian Society are well beyond shady. We need to invent a whole new concept of shady for them :) --["BryanBell"]	+ ''2005-02-16 21:34:12'' [[nbsp]] the ["Black Caesar"] was definitley shady as was ["Suicides" Andrew Wieman's death]. --["Users/KenBloom"]
Line 28:	Line 30:
- ''2005-02-16 21:34:12'' [[nbsp]] the ["Black Caesar"] was definitley shady as was ["Suicides" Andrew Wieman's death]. --["KenBloom"]	+ ''2005-02-21 12:39:27'' [[nbsp]] i recently found out that two of my friends are members of s&s. if these two jackasses are members, S&S's shadiness factor should be well below Plasma Screens, which is, by far, the shadiest of the lot. --["Users/RishiTrivedi"]
Line 30:	Line 32:
- ''2005-02-21 12:39:27'' [[nbsp]] i recently found out that two of my friends are members of s&s. if these two jackasses are members, S&S's shadiness factor should be well below Plasma Screens, which is, by far, the shadiest of the lot. --["RishiTrivedi"]	+ I think the Shadiness factor (of the Sterling Riot) lies with the police --["Users/JamesSchwab"] + * I was there, the Sterling Riot was a clear and present significant danger to any innocent residents of the complex and their properties. It is my opinion that it was absolutely not shadiness on behalf of the police. --["Users/KrisFricke"] + * There are proper methods of crowd control, from all the reports I've read and heard, the police did not use proper procedure. Using proper procedure will lead to a decrease in tensions not increases. The Police are professionals and they should be able to properly disperse a crowd. --["Users/JamesSchwab"] + * I've heard your objections to their "non-lethal weapons" and I've studying that subject myself, but the point is that the crowd was already unruly, violent and threatening before the cops arrived. I know people who feared for their lives and barely managed to escape (after being chased by large drunk riotious young males) way before the cops arrived. The riot was in process before the cops got involved. --["Users/KrisFricke"] + * I never said the crowd wasn't violent, I never defended students, I criticized the police. Again, proper methods of crowd dispersion were not used. --["Users/JamesSchwab"]
Line 32:	Line 38:
- I think the Shadiness factor (of the Sterling Riot) lies with the police --["JamesSchwab"] - * I was there, the Sterling Riot was a clear and present significant danger to any innocent residents of the complex and their properties. It is my opinion that it was absolutely not shadiness on behalf of the police. --["KrisFricke"] - * There are proper methods of crowd control, from all the reports I've read and heard, the police did not use proper procedure. Using proper procedure will lead to a decrease in tensions not increases. The Police are professionals and they should be able to properly disperse a crowd. --["JamesSchwab"] - * I've heard your objections to their "non-lethal weapons" and I've studying that subject myself, but the point is that the crowd was already unruly, violent and threatening before the cops arrived. I know people who feared for their lives and barely managed to escape (after being chased by large drunk riotious young males) way before the cops arrived. The riot was in process before the cops got involved. --["KrisFricke"] - * I never said the crowd wasn't violent, I never defended students, I criticized the police. Again, proper methods of crowd dispersion were not used. --["JamesSchwab"]	+ ''2005-03-09 13:41:18'' [[nbsp]] [http://www.livejournal.com/users/emosnail/163600.html Recent polling] indicates that Rob Roy's disqualification is indeed pretty damn near a 10! --["Users/KrisFricke"]
Line 38:	Line 40:
- ''2005-03-09 13:41:18'' [[nbsp]] [http://www.livejournal.com/users/emosnail/163600.html Recent polling] indicates that Rob Roy's disqualification is indeed pretty damn near a 10! --["KrisFricke"]	+ ''2005-03-17 14:20:24'' [[nbsp]] I think ["Jusco"] is pretty shady. --["Users/MarieHuynh"]
Line 40:	Line 42:
- ''2005-03-17 14:20:24'' [[nbsp]] I think ["Jusco"] is pretty shady. --["MarieHuynh"]	+ ''2005-03-17 15:12:02'' [[nbsp]] How bout the ["Tiqula Bledsoe"] incident? --["Users/ArlenAbraham"] + * Which Tiqula incident? I think Tiqula in general was about a 10.1 --["Users/KrisFricke"]
Line 42:	Line 45:
- ''2005-03-17 15:12:02'' [[nbsp]] How bout the ["Tiqula Bledsoe"] incident? --["ArlenAbraham"] - * Which Tiqula incident? I think Tiqula in general was about a 10.1 --["KrisFricke"]	+ ''2005-03-18 22:15:57'' [[nbsp]] i really don't like how Campus Crusade is put at a #9 ranking in being shady. I've kept my mouth shut about christian bashing on wiki (because it's sometimes funny i.e - christian kids saying darn and gosh), but the #9 ranking is going too far. It's a religious org and to give it a 9 ranking makes wiki users look like jerks --["Users/GeorgejAndrews"] + * They are pretty shady though. I am frequently accosted by them on the quad and around the CoHo (not so much this quarter tho) and they want to convert me or something. That seems pretty damn shady to me. What rating would you recommmend? --["Users/GeorgeLewis"] + * I'll poll the shadiness rating of campus crusade for christ next time ["EMOSNAIL"] updates. Well time after next, because we have another ASUCD poll overdue. --["Users/KrisFricke"] + * Having Fricke do a poll on Campus Crusade in EMOSNAIL is like having me do a poll on Nathan Thomas/Black Caesar/Dan Beeman Approval ratings among DCR members --["Users/GeorgejAndrews"] + * I'm shocked George, that one would imply EMOSNAIL polling is anything but the paridigm of objectivity! (= --["Users/KrisFricke"] + * Okay George I think the polls have run long enough for me to reveal my true motive for running the CCC poll -- the results in EMOSNAIL show a significantly lower (by .93) shadiness rating than the results in the ucdavis community. I think we can safely say that the readers of emosnail are NOT unduly biased against religious groups. --["Users/KrisFricke"]
Line 45:	Line 52:
- ''2005-03-18 22:15:57'' [[nbsp]] i really don't like how Campus Crusade is put at a #9 ranking in being shady. I've kept my mouth shut about christian bashing on wiki (because it's sometimes funny i.e - christian kids saying darn and gosh), but the #9 ranking is going too far. It's a religious org and to give it a 9 ranking makes wiki users look like jerks --["GeorgejAndrews"] - * They are pretty shady though. I am frequently accosted by them on the quad and around the CoHo (not so much this quarter tho) and they want to convert me or something. That seems pretty damn shady to me. What rating would you recommmend? --["GeorgeLewis"] - * I'll poll the shadiness rating of campus crusade for christ next time ["EMOSNAIL"] updates. Well time after next, because we have another ASUCD poll overdue. --["KrisFricke"] - * Having Fricke do a poll on Campus Crusade in EMOSNAIL is like having me do a poll on Nathan Thomas/Black Caesar/Dan Beeman Approval ratings among DCR members --["GeorgejAndrews"] - * I'm shocked George, that one would imply EMOSNAIL polling is anything but the paridigm of objectivity! (= --["KrisFricke"] - * Okay George I think the polls have run long enough for me to reveal my true motive for running the CCC poll -- the results in EMOSNAIL show a significantly lower (by .93) shadiness rating than the results in the ucdavis community. I think we can safely say that the readers of emosnail are NOT unduly biased against religious groups. --["KrisFricke"]	+ ''2005-03-18 23:59:32'' [[nbsp]] For George's sake you might want to add the LaRouche people on the list...now those guys are WAY shady. Double the square?! Talk about brainwashing a-holes! --["Users/JimSchwab"] + * Hmm, where to put the LaRouche people? It's hard to decide, because it's not exactly secret that they're a cult. I've heard people saying the same thing at Ventura College, UCLA, and UCSB. Perhaps 9, and move the Crusade up to 8? We might also want to split off an ASUCD list in the future. --["Users/BrentLaabs"] + * ummmmm...YEAH. Put those damn LaRouche people on there. I been bothered at least as many times by them as the CCC. Admittedly though, they don't bother me nearly as much for obvious reason. --["Users/GeorgeLewis"] + * What do you say 7? 8? for LaRouche --["Users/JimSchwab"] + * I call it a 8 --["Users/GeorgeLewis"] + * Since it is now on the list twice, we'll keep the polls open on LaRouche. I vote 9. --["Users/BrentLaabs"] + * 10 damn it! they yell hella rude things to people and act like LaRouche is going to save the whole world even though he seems quite crazy --["Users/RevChad"] + * I agree Chad, but annoyance != shadyness. They aren't very secretive, which is one of the main definitions of shadiness. --["Users/BrentLaabs"] + * They claim to promote thinking for yourself while trying to brainwash you, and they claim to promote math while Barnabas Truman tells me they are out to distort/destroy mathematics as he knows it. LaRouche > CCC. --["Users/RevChad"]
Line 52:	Line 62:
- ''2005-03-18 23:59:32'' [[nbsp]] For George's sake you might want to add the LaRouche people on the list...now those guys are WAY shady. Double the square?! Talk about brainwashing a-holes! --["JimSchwab"] - * Hmm, where to put the LaRouche people? It's hard to decide, because it's not exactly secret that they're a cult. I've heard people saying the same thing at Ventura College, UCLA, and UCSB. Perhaps 9, and move the Crusade up to 8? We might also want to split off an ASUCD list in the future. --["BrentLaabs"] - * ummmmm...YEAH. Put those damn LaRouche people on there. I been bothered at least as many times by them as the CCC. Admittedly though, they don't bother me nearly as much for obvious reason. --["GeorgeLewis"] - * What do you say 7? 8? for LaRouche --["JimSchwab"] - * I call it a 8 --["GeorgeLewis"] - * Since it is now on the list twice, we'll keep the polls open on LaRouche. I vote 9. --["BrentLaabs"] - * 10 damn it! they yell hella rude things to people and act like LaRouche is going to save the whole world even though he seems quite crazy --["RevChad"] - * I agree Chad, but annoyance != shadyness. They aren't very secretive, which is one of the main definitions of shadiness. --["BrentLaabs"] - * They claim to promote thinking for yourself while trying to brainwash you, and they claim to promote math while Barnabas Truman tells me they are out to distort/destroy mathematics as he knows it. LaRouche > CCC. --["RevChad"] -	+ ''2005-03-19 20:00:45'' [[nbsp]] Philip, by calling this page a joke. I am offened. Are you saying my disqualification was not shady? You are no longer a friend. I hate you. --["Users/RobRoy"]
Line 63:	Line 64:
- - ''2005-03-19 20:00:45'' [[nbsp]] Philip, by calling this page a joke. I am offened. Are you saying my disqualification was not shady? You are no longer a friend. I hate you. --["RobRoy"]	+ ''2005-03-19 21:13:18'' [[nbsp]] I see religious frats on here, but what about normal social or career specific fraternities? --["Users/GeorgeLewis"]
Line 66:	Line 66:
- ''2005-03-19 21:13:18'' [[nbsp]] I see religious frats on here, but what about normal social or career specific fraternities? --["GeorgeLewis"] - ------ - ''2005-03-19 21:16:39'' [[nbsp]] Do joke pages have a place? I mean, yes I would consider some regular frats shady, but that is my own opinion. Others may find the ACLU or Choice voting shady.... --["JimSchwab"]	+ ''2005-03-19 21:16:39'' [[nbsp]] Do joke pages have a place? I mean, yes I would consider some regular frats shady, but that is my own opinion. Others may find the ACLU or Choice voting shady.... --["Users/JimSchwab"]
Line 71:	Line 69:
- ''2005-03-19 21:20:54'' [[nbsp]] The religious frats are shady due to their connections with ["ASUCD"]. Look through the history on ["Senate"] if you want to know more. --["BrentLaabs"]	+ ''2005-03-19 21:20:54'' [[nbsp]] The religious frats are shady due to their connections with ["ASUCD"]. Look through the history on ["Senate"] if you want to know more. --["Users/BrentLaabs"]
Line 73:	Line 71:
- ''2005-03-19 22:22:23'' [[nbsp]] I'm shocked and appalled that you rated the Orwellians as 3 on a shadiness list. Shame on you. The Orwellians are doubleplusunshady, and can't stand when they get negative publicity. ;) --["BrentLaabs"]	+ ''2005-03-19 22:22:23'' [[nbsp]] I'm shocked and appalled that you rated the Orwellians as 3 on a shadiness list. Shame on you. The Orwellians are doubleplusunshady, and can't stand when they get negative publicity. ;) --["Users/BrentLaabs"]
Line 75:	Line 73:
- ''2005-03-20 16:19:07'' [[nbsp]] I don't think these individual lists are a very good idea at all. If you have a presonal list, put it on your own page or else before we know it this will have everyones list on it and the page will be crazy long. --["GeorgeLewis"]	+ ''2005-03-20 16:19:07'' [[nbsp]] I don't think these individual lists are a very good idea at all. If you have a presonal list, put it on your own page or else before we know it this will have everyones list on it and the page will be crazy long. --["Users/GeorgeLewis"]
Line 77:	Line 75:
- ''2005-03-20 20:00:38'' [[nbsp]] Is Ashley Orsaba's list reversed, with things descending from most to least shady? Also I agree with George -- I don't think this page is meant to be lists of shadiness so much as the things listed are examples to illustrate the One True List --["KrisFricke"]	+ ''2005-03-20 20:00:38'' [[nbsp]] Is Ashley Orsaba's list reversed, with things descending from most to least shady? Also I agree with George -- I don't think this page is meant to be lists of shadiness so much as the things listed are examples to illustrate the One True List --["Users/KrisFricke"]
Line 79:	Line 77:
- ''2005-03-20 20:24:10'' [[nbsp]] he he he, yes i DID screw up my list and now i deleted it, since apparently its alright if only some people are allowed to have lists but not all --["AshleyOrsaba"]	+ ''2005-03-20 20:24:10'' [[nbsp]] he he he, yes i DID screw up my list and now i deleted it, since apparently its alright if only some people are allowed to have lists but not all --["Users/AshleyOrsaba"]
Line 81:	Line 79:
- ''2005-03-20 20:36:13'' [[nbsp]] Ashley, who said that? I think that there shouldn't be any extra lists on this page and we should start a new page where people can post their own lists if necessary. There should only be one list on this page --["GeorgeLewis"]	+ ''2005-03-20 20:36:13'' [[nbsp]] Ashley, who said that? I think that there shouldn't be any extra lists on this page and we should start a new page where people can post their own lists if necessary. There should only be one list on this page --["Users/GeorgeLewis"]
Line 83:	Line 81:
- ''2005-03-20 20:52:13'' [[nbsp]] people should add their own lists to show that people have varying opinions and so everyone is not accountable to the "example" list above. that way there is no attempt to represent everyones views. If this page gets too long then another page can be made at that time. --["KristenBirdsall"]	+ ''2005-03-20 20:52:13'' [[nbsp]] people should add their own lists to show that people have varying opinions and so everyone is not accountable to the "example" list above. that way there is no attempt to represent everyones views. If this page gets too long then another page can be made at that time. --["Users/KristenBirdsall"]
Line 85:	Line 83:
- I removed the attribution of my list because I did not want it there. I added my list because I felt it lessened the impact and seeming authority the first list would have. There is no way there will be a concencious opinion on whether or not something is "really really shaddy," so just showing differing opinions is important. Besides, isn't the point of this page to illustrate the idea rather than convince us something is ''shaddy''? None of the items have explainations, so it's probably just meant as an illustration. If there's actual discussion about this stuff, why not add it to the individual pages instead? I notice that the ["Sterling University Vista Apartments"] page has no discussion about whether or not the riot was X and Y, and instead this dialog has taken place elsewhere several times. --["PhilipNeustrom"]	+ I removed the attribution of my list because I did not want it there. I added my list because I felt it lessened the impact and seeming authority the first list would have. There is no way there will be a concencious opinion on whether or not something is "really really shaddy," so just showing differing opinions is important. Besides, isn't the point of this page to illustrate the idea rather than convince us something is ''shaddy''? None of the items have explainations, so it's probably just meant as an illustration. If there's actual discussion about this stuff, why not add it to the individual pages instead? I notice that the ["Sterling University Vista Apartments"] page has no discussion about whether or not the riot was X and Y, and instead this dialog has taken place elsewhere several times. --["Users/PhilipNeustrom"]
Line 87:	Line 85:
- ''2005-03-20 21:55:55'' [[nbsp]] agreed. i like your take --["AshleyOrsaba"]	+ ''2005-03-20 21:55:55'' [[nbsp]] agreed. i like your take --["Users/AshleyOrsaba"]
Line 89:	Line 87:
- ''2005-03-20 22:20:56'' [[nbsp]] Interesting. I still think there needs to be some sort of standardized ranking system. The original seemed fine to me. heh. oh well. --["GeorgeLewis"]	+ ''2005-03-20 22:20:56'' [[nbsp]] Interesting. I still think there needs to be some sort of standardized ranking system. The original seemed fine to me. heh. oh well. --["Users/GeorgeLewis"]
Line 91:	Line 89:
- ''2005-03-20 22:22:39'' [[nbsp]] I completely disagree with you because the top list does have more authority. It represents a consensus decision on each item. It represents polling at ["EMOSNAIL"]. Your list is not as important as any of the other lists. If you weren't an admin, I'd be editing you now. [[BR]][[BR]] If you want to have different lists, I'd prefer that they were about different things. ASUCD, stores in Davis, the administration. --["BrentLaabs"]	+ ''2005-03-20 22:22:39'' [[nbsp]] I completely disagree with you because the top list does have more authority. It represents a consensus decision on each item. It represents polling at ["EMOSNAIL"]. Your list is not as important as any of the other lists. If you weren't an admin, I'd be editing you now. [[BR]][[BR]] If you want to have different lists, I'd prefer that they were about different things. ASUCD, stores in Davis, the administration. --["Users/BrentLaabs"]
Line 94:	Line 92:
- ''2005-03-20 22:26:48'' [[nbsp]] well i think then it sould say "Based on emosnail" or something b/c i'm sure i'm not the only one who didnt know the origin of the first list. --["AshleyOrsaba"]	+ ''2005-03-20 22:26:48'' [[nbsp]] well i think then it sould say "Based on emosnail" or something b/c i'm sure i'm not the only one who didnt know the origin of the first list. --["Users/AshleyOrsaba"]
Line 96:	Line 94:
- ''2005-03-20 22:29:27'' [[nbsp]] Not all the things on the first list come from ["Emosnail"] --["JimSchwab"]	+ ''2005-03-20 22:29:27'' [[nbsp]] Not all the things on the first list come from ["Emosnail"] --["Users/JimSchwab"]
Line 100:	Line 98:
- ["MarkKlebanov"], ["BrentLaabs"], ["AdamGerber"], ["RevChad"], ["KenBloom"]. ["KrisFricke"], ["JamesSchwab"], ["RishiTrivedi"], and ["PhilipNeustrom"] have all contributed to the first list. The other ones represent a single person's list.	+ ["Users/MarkKlebanov"], ["Users/BrentLaabs"], ["Users/AdamGerber"], ["Users/RevChad"], ["Users/KenBloom"]. ["Users/KrisFricke"], ["Users/JamesSchwab"], ["Users/RishiTrivedi"], and ["Users/PhilipNeustrom"] have all contributed to the first list. The other ones represent a single person's list.
Line 102:	Line 100:
- Can we edit those lists too? --["BrentLaabs"]	+ Can we edit those lists too? --["Users/BrentLaabs"]
Line 104:	Line 102:
- ''2005-03-20 23:47:25'' [[nbsp]] Yeah, but it just doesn't feel right to remove your edits. There has to be someone that we all respect around here, and I wouldn't edit you unless we got a consensus around here. Whether you like it or not, you're not just any other person on this wiki. --["BrentLaabs"]	+ ''2005-03-20 23:47:25'' [[nbsp]] Yeah, but it just doesn't feel right to remove your edits. There has to be someone that we all respect around here, and I wouldn't edit you unless we got a consensus around here. Whether you like it or not, you're not just any other person on this wiki. --["Users/BrentLaabs"]
Line 106:	Line 104:
- ''2005-03-21 05:21:12'' [[nbsp]] Phil is a ["Glossary" Davis Mount Rushmore]-ee! --["KrisFricke"]	+ ''2005-03-21 05:21:12'' [[nbsp]] Phil is a ["Glossary" Davis Mount Rushmore]-ee! --["Users/KrisFricke"]
Line 108:	Line 106:
- ''2005-03-21 22:51:57'' [[nbsp]] how is Students for an Orwellian Society on equal shadiness as lamargate or midgetcop? --["MarieHuynh"]	+ ''2005-03-21 22:51:57'' [[nbsp]] how is Students for an Orwellian Society on equal shadiness as lamargate or midgetcop? --["Users/MarieHuynh"]
Line 110:	Line 108:
- ''2005-03-21 22:59:19'' [[nbsp]] I would say Lamargate is far more shady than either of those two...and I don't know why the midget cop is shady at all --["GeorgeLewis"]	+ ''2005-03-21 22:59:19'' [[nbsp]] I would say Lamargate is far more shady than either of those two...and I don't know why the midget cop is shady at all --["Users/GeorgeLewis"]
Line 112:	Line 110:
- ''2005-03-21 23:03:43'' [[nbsp]] Yeah I was wondering about the midget cop too, but then I remembered -- he allegedly couldn't pass the physical requirements for the police force (being a midget and all), so he sued them -- pursuant to the lawsuit they allowed him to become a police officer. Equal opportunity for the handicapped is all good and well but the police and fire departments have physical standards for a reason, and its NOT to persecute the vertically challenged! --["KrisFricke"]	+ ''2005-03-21 23:03:43'' [[nbsp]] Yeah I was wondering about the midget cop too, but then I remembered -- he allegedly couldn't pass the physical requirements for the police force (being a midget and all), so he sued them -- pursuant to the lawsuit they allowed him to become a police officer. Equal opportunity for the handicapped is all good and well but the police and fire departments have physical standards for a reason, and its NOT to persecute the vertically challenged! --["Users/KrisFricke"]
Line 114:	Line 112:
- ''2005-03-21 23:17:12'' [[nbsp]] I've saw him take down two football players outside of Cantina about two years ago....I dont think any of us could do that --["JimSchwab"]	+ ''2005-03-21 23:17:12'' [[nbsp]] I've saw him take down two football players outside of Cantina about two years ago....I dont think any of us could do that --["Users/JimSchwab"]
Line 116:	Line 114:
- ''2005-03-21 23:25:39'' [[nbsp]] I'm sure the man is in shape and I bet he puts a lot of effort into maintaining optimum fitness (possibly feeling he needs to prove himself -- napoleon complex?) -- but what I heard was that he couldn't do certain things -- I dunno maybe he had to jump over something or something -- and he was unable. I dunno I'm just saying that thats the creation myth I heard for his commission, if its not true than there's nothing shady. Also I want to disclaim that I by no means mean to sound patronizing of his condition here, its admirable that he won't let his physical handicap prevent him from doing what he wants and from what I hear he does a good job. --["KrisFricke"]	+ ''2005-03-21 23:25:39'' [[nbsp]] I'm sure the man is in shape and I bet he puts a lot of effort into maintaining optimum fitness (possibly feeling he needs to prove himself -- napoleon complex?) -- but what I heard was that he couldn't do certain things -- I dunno maybe he had to jump over something or something -- and he was unable. I dunno I'm just saying that thats the creation myth I heard for his commission, if its not true than there's nothing shady. Also I want to disclaim that I by no means mean to sound patronizing of his condition here, its admirable that he won't let his physical handicap prevent him from doing what he wants and from what I hear he does a good job. --["Users/KrisFricke"]
Line 118:	Line 116:
- ''2005-03-21 23:31:24'' [[nbsp]] I had heard that he was no longer in Davis. Is this not true? --["GeorgeLewis"]	+ ''2005-03-21 23:31:24'' [[nbsp]] I had heard that he was no longer in Davis. Is this not true? --["Users/GeorgeLewis"]
Line 120:	Line 118:
- ''2005-03-22 00:01:54'' [[nbsp]] I saw him driving a patrol car last week. --["JimSchwab"]	+ ''2005-03-22 00:01:54'' [[nbsp]] I saw him driving a patrol car last week. --["Users/JimSchwab"]
Line 122:	Line 120:
- ''2005-06-12 16:27:03'' [[nbsp]] I think the ["Shadiness Factor"] page is pretty shady. --["MichaelGiardina"]	+ ''2005-06-12 16:27:03'' [[nbsp]] I think the ["Shadiness Factor"] page is pretty shady. --["Users/MichaelGiardina"]
Line 124:	Line 122:
- ''2005-07-19 18:12:51'' [[nbsp]] I got quite a kick out of this page, though it is so ucd-kid centric that I don't understand a lot of it. --["RocksandDirt"]	+ ''2005-07-19 18:12:51'' [[nbsp]] I got quite a kick out of this page, though it is so ucd-kid centric that I don't understand a lot of it. --["Users/RocksandDirt"]
Line 126:	Line 124:
- ''2005-08-29 14:57:45'' [[nbsp]] I don't think the Midget Cop is shady at all. One of my friends met him and said that he was very nice and absolutely NOT shady. --["AllisonEriksen"]	+ ''2005-08-29 14:57:45'' [[nbsp]] I don't think the Midget Cop is shady at all. One of my friends met him and said that he was very nice and absolutely NOT shady. --["Users/AllisonEriksen"]
Line 128:	Line 126:
- ''2005-08-29 18:54:22'' [[nbsp]] Well, he's less shady than ["TAPS"], which is an organization that gives parking tickets. And far less shady than the Sterling Riots. I'd say that he's doing pretty well for law enforcement. --["BrentLaabs"]	+ ''2005-08-29 18:54:22'' [[nbsp]] Well, he's less shady than ["TAPS"], which is an organization that gives parking tickets. And far less shady than the Sterling Riots. I'd say that he's doing pretty well for law enforcement. --["Users/BrentLaabs"]
Line 130:	Line 128:
- ''2005-11-02 08:26:27'' [[nbsp]] Covell Village is upgraded to 10 after the last two days of illegal campaign practices on campus. --["SharlaDaly"]	+ ''2005-11-02 08:26:27'' [[nbsp]] Covell Village is upgraded to 10 after the last two days of illegal campaign practices on campus. --["Users/SharlaDaly"]
Line 132:	Line 130:
- ''2005-11-02 10:46:34'' [[nbsp]] TAPS is definitely shadier than that, and what about that damn 'firetruck'? --["AllisonEriksen"]	+ ''2005-11-02 10:46:34'' [[nbsp]] TAPS is definitely shadier than that, and what about that damn 'firetruck'? --["Users/AllisonEriksen"]
Line 134:	Line 132:
- ''2005-11-07 17:16:14'' [[nbsp]] removed Measure X entry in category 9 since it was upgraded to category 10 --["KarlMogel"]	+ ''2005-11-07 17:16:14'' [[nbsp]] removed Measure X entry in category 9 since it was upgraded to category 10 --["Users/KarlMogel"]
Line 136:	Line 134:
- ''2005-11-07 19:28:22'' [[nbsp]] I think the list needs to be inverted, with 10 at the top and 1 at the bottom. --["SteveDavison"]	+ ''2005-11-07 19:28:22'' [[nbsp]] I think the list needs to be inverted, with 10 at the top and 1 at the bottom. --["Users/SteveDavison"]
Line 138:	Line 136:
- ''2006-02-10 12:58:38'' [[nbsp]] Is this shadiness rating system on a simple increasing scale, or is it on a log scale (i.e. LaRouche cultists are a million times shadier than frisbee players on the quad)? --["MatthewTom"]	+ ''2006-02-10 12:58:38'' [[nbsp]] Is this shadiness rating system on a simple increasing scale, or is it on a log scale (i.e. LaRouche cultists are a million times shadier than frisbee players on the quad)? --["Users/MatthewTom"]
Line 140:	Line 138:
- ''2006-08-09 16:51:32'' [[nbsp]] Why, ''Natural Log'' of course! --["KarlMogel"]	+ ''2006-08-09 16:51:32'' [[nbsp]] Why, ''Natural Log'' of course! --["Users/KarlMogel"]
Line 142:	Line 140:
- ''2006-08-09 18:19:06'' [[nbsp]] Wow, my old LEAD Freshmen 2009 facebook group made the Shady List! Yeah, that was hella shady. Add that to the list of my all-time best sinister plans. I'd've gotten away with it, too, if it weren't for you meddling kids, and [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Scooby_doo#Scooby-Doo_in_popular_culture that dumb dog of yours] ;-) --["PaulHarms"] - * I'm going to start calling you Slim Shady Harms ["JimSchwab"]	+ ''2006-08-09 18:19:06'' [[nbsp]] Wow, my old LEAD Freshmen 2009 facebook group made the Shady List! Yeah, that was hella shady. Add that to the list of my all-time best sinister plans. I'd've gotten away with it, too, if it weren't for you meddling kids, and [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Scooby_doo#Scooby-Doo_in_popular_culture that dumb dog of yours] ;-) --["Users/PaulHarms"] + * I'm going to start calling you Slim Shady Harms ["Users/JimSchwab"]
Line 145:	Line 143:
- ''2006-08-09 20:15:39'' [[nbsp]] The shadiness is inviting mass amounts of freshmen simply to fill up groups and order them to vote for certain candidates without really interacting with them. I think that might have been the original concern. --["SteveOstrowski"]	+ ''2006-08-09 20:15:39'' [[nbsp]] The shadiness is inviting mass amounts of freshmen simply to fill up groups and order them to vote for certain candidates without really interacting with them. I think that might have been the original concern. --["Users/SteveOstrowski"]
Line 170:	Line 168:
- -["PaulHarms" Shady H]	+ -["Users/PaulHarms" Shady H]
Line 172:	Line 170:
- ''2006-12-10 10:35:23'' [[nbsp]] Steve's position on academic Senate is no longer shady, as the ASUCD Senate voted 6-5-1 to confirm the appointment. --["PaulHarms"]	+ ''2006-12-10 10:35:23'' [[nbsp]] Steve's position on academic Senate is no longer shady, as the ASUCD Senate voted 6-5-1 to confirm the appointment. --["Users/PaulHarms"]
Line 174:	Line 172:
- ''2006-12-12 16:26:01'' [[nbsp]] I don't see how it is shady to take over the Progressive Coalition, I mean who wouldn't? --["SteveOstrowski"]	+ ''2006-12-12 16:26:01'' [[nbsp]] I don't see how it is shady to take over the Progressive Coalition, I mean who wouldn't? --["Users/SteveOstrowski"]
Line 176:	Line 174:
- ''2006-12-14 16:59:42'' [[nbsp]] Actually, AEPi is not religious at all, it's just a collection of mostly secular jewish college students. Most of our brothers are not religious and we even have a catholic brother! --["EricFriedman"] - Hence why it has only a two. Its just a little more shady than a sunny day on the quad, and thats only because it is indoors and not outside. --["MaxMikalonis"] - what does religion have to do with the fraternity? aepi is considered a social fraternity, not a religious one. --["EvanChait"]	+ ''2006-12-14 16:59:42'' [[nbsp]] Actually, AEPi is not religious at all, it's just a collection of mostly secular jewish college students. Most of our brothers are not religious and we even have a catholic brother! --["Users/EricFriedman"] + Hence why it has only a two. Its just a little more shady than a sunny day on the quad, and thats only because it is indoors and not outside. --["Users/MaxMikalonis"] + what does religion have to do with the fraternity? aepi is considered a social fraternity, not a religious one. --["Users/EvanChait"]
Line 180:	Line 178:
- ''2007-01-21 17:26:26'' [[nbsp]] Oh come on, you've always wanted to get sued at least once. --["SteveOstrowski"]	+ ''2007-01-21 17:26:26'' [[nbsp]] Oh come on, you've always wanted to get sued at least once. --["Users/SteveOstrowski"]

Shadiness Factor

BrentLaabs — 2008-08-20 17:24:56

answer

Differences for Shadiness Factor

Deletions are marked with - .	Additions are marked with +.
Line 186:	Line 186:
	+ * Choose between 5 (Student Focus recruiting), 6 (Sterling Riots), or 8 (Campaigning in Dorms) --["Users/BrentLaabs"]

Shadiness Factor

JabberWokky — 2008-08-20 16:17:39

Tongue in cheek, running and ducking.

Differences for Shadiness Factor

Deletions are marked with - .	Additions are marked with +.
Line 9:	Line 9:
- 2. Religious Fraternities (ie. ["Alpha Gamma Omega" AGO] and ["Alpha Epsilon Pi" AEPi]), ["Davis411"].com, [http://www.ljdrama.org/ LiveJournal drama].	+ 2. Religious Fraternities (ie. ["Alpha Gamma Omega" AGO] and ["Alpha Epsilon Pi" AEPi]), People who discriminate against religious beliefs, ["Davis411"].com, [http://www.ljdrama.org/ LiveJournal drama].

Shadiness Factor

JoePomidor — 2008-08-20 14:56:48

Comment added.

Differences for Shadiness Factor

Deletions are marked with - .	Additions are marked with +.
Line 183:	Line 183:
	+ ------ + ''2008-08-20 15:56:48'' [[nbsp]] If religious fraternities are a 2, then what are regular fraternities? + --["Users/JoePomidor"]

Shadiness Factor

TyNowotny — 2008-08-20 14:12:35

(quick edit)

Differences for Shadiness Factor

Deletions are marked with - .	Additions are marked with +.
Line 8:	Line 8:
- 1. Playing frisbee on ["the Quad"] (on a sunny day, of course). ["Bike Church"] Pastors not showing up for scheduled times, they have lives and sometimes other important things, but it just appears shady.	+ 1. Playing frisbee on ["the Quad"] (on a sunny day, of course). ["Bike Church"] ministers not showing up for scheduled times, they have lives and sometimes other important things, but it just appears shady.

Shadiness Factor

JoePomidor — 2008-08-17 01:16:03

(quick edit)

Differences for Shadiness Factor

Deletions are marked with - .	Additions are marked with +.
Line 16:	Line 16:
- 9. ["LaRouche" LaRouche cultists], --X ["Mr. Chan's"] ["Chinese Food"] X--, ["ASUCD"] religious political ["Christian Democratic Party" parties], ["Steve Ostrowski" sueing your friends].	+ 9. ["LaRouche" LaRouche cultists], --X ["Mr. Chan's"] ["Chinese Food"] X--, ["ASUCD"] religious political ["Christian Democratic Party" parties], ["Steve Ostrowski" suing your friends].

Shadiness Factor

JoePomidor — 2008-08-16 22:30:40

Differences for Shadiness Factor

Deletions are marked with - .	Additions are marked with +.
Line 10:	Line 10:
- 3. ["Lamargate"], ["Midget Cop"], ["Students for an Orwellian Society"].	+ 3. ["Lamargate"], ["Tom Waltz"], ["Students for an Orwellian Society"].

Shadiness Factor

GregWebb — 2008-07-09 02:44:47

Differences for Shadiness Factor

Deletions are marked with - .	Additions are marked with +.
Line 12:	Line 12:
- 5. The smell by the cereal in the ["Coffee House" CoHo], John Li of the ["Governance Task Force"], ["Student Focus"] recruiting 1000+ [http://ucdavis.facebook.com/group.php?gid=2203923609 incoming freshmen on Facebook], or ["LEAD"] using the same tactic for three years running although their secret groups are much smaller and may involve active freshmen inviting friends.	+ 5. The smell by the cereal in the ["Coffee House" CoHo], John Li of the ["Governance Task Force"], ["Student Focus"] recruiting [http://ucdavis.facebook.com/group.php?gid=2203923609 incoming freshmen on Facebook](c/o 2010), or ["LEAD"] using the same tactic for three years running (c/o 2010-2012) .

Shadiness Factor

GregWebb — 2008-07-08 16:32:25

Differences for Shadiness Factor

Deletions are marked with - .	Additions are marked with +.
Line 12:	Line 12:
- 5. The smell by the cereal in the ["Coffee House" CoHo], John Li of the ["Governance Task Force"], ["Student Focus"] recruiting 1000+ [http://ucdavis.facebook.com/group.php?gid=2203923609 incoming freshmen on Facebook], or ["LEAD"] using the same tactic for two years running although their secret groups are much smaller and may involve active freshmen inviting friends.	+ 5. The smell by the cereal in the ["Coffee House" CoHo], John Li of the ["Governance Task Force"], ["Student Focus"] recruiting 1000+ [http://ucdavis.facebook.com/group.php?gid=2203923609 incoming freshmen on Facebook], or ["LEAD"] using the same tactic for three years running although their secret groups are much smaller and may involve active freshmen inviting friends.

Shadiness Factor

CarlosOverstreet — 2007-11-21 12:08:21

Differences for Shadiness Factor

Deletions are marked with - .	Additions are marked with +.
Line 14:	Line 14:
- 7. The ["Sterling University Vista Apartments"] Riot, ["Campus Crusade for Christ"], Steven Ostrowski trying to "take over" the ["Progressive Coalition"]	+ 7. The ["Sterling University Vista Apartments"] Riot, ["Campus Crusade for Christ"], Steven Ostrowski trying to "take over" the ["Progressive Coalition"], ["ASUCD Elections"].

Shadiness Factor

CarlosOverstreet — 2007-06-17 00:51:09

Comment added.

Differences for Shadiness Factor

Deletions are marked with - .	Additions are marked with +.
Line 181:	Line 181:
	+ ------ + ''2007-06-17 01:51:09'' [[nbsp]] I would argue LEAD should be listed as shady or shadier than campus crusade. --["Users/CarlosOverstreet"]

Shadiness Factor

PhilipNeustrom — 2007-05-08 11:49:14

Differences for Shadiness Factor

Deletions are marked with - .	Additions are marked with +.
Line 8:	Line 8:
- 1. ["Bike Church"] Pastors not showing up for scheduled times, they have lives and sometimes other important things, but it just appears shady - 1. Playing frisbee on ["the Quad"] (on a sunny day, of course).	+ 1. Playing frisbee on ["the Quad"] (on a sunny day, of course). ["Bike Church"] Pastors not showing up for scheduled times, they have lives and sometimes other important things, but it just appears shady.

Shadiness Factor

PhilipNeustrom — 2007-05-08 11:48:21

like that?

Differences for Shadiness Factor

Deletions are marked with - .	Additions are marked with +.
Line 8:	Line 8:
- ##I can't get the damn formating right! if I remove the - or add a 0 it automaticall moves the list up one number --["Users/StevenDaubert"] - -1. ["Bike Church"] Pastors not showing up for scheduled times, they have lives and sometimes other important things, but it just appears shady - ##0. The ["Davis Wiki"] is sometimes controversial over the way the medium obtains content and information, but it's really not shady	+ 1. ["Bike Church"] Pastors not showing up for scheduled times, they have lives and sometimes other important things, but it just appears shady

Shadiness Factor

StevenDaubert — 2007-05-08 11:43:45

added aspects of the bike church to shadyness list =D

Differences for Shadiness Factor

Deletions are marked with - .	Additions are marked with +.
Line 8:	Line 8:
-	+ ##I can't get the damn formating right! if I remove the - or add a 0 it automaticall moves the list up one number --["Users/StevenDaubert"] + -1. ["Bike Church"] Pastors not showing up for scheduled times, they have lives and sometimes other important things, but it just appears shady + ##0. The ["Davis Wiki"] is sometimes controversial over the way the medium obtains content and information, but it's really not shady

Shadiness Factor

MaxMikalonis — 2007-05-06 13:50:58

(quick edit)

Differences for Shadiness Factor

Deletions are marked with - .	Additions are marked with +.
Line 18:	Line 18:
- 10. ["Sword and Sandals"], a local secret society. ["Rob Roy"] getting ["Winter 2005 ASUCD Election/Disqualification Controversy" disqualified], ["Measure X"]/["Covell Village"] campaign on campus - pizza for vote trade, hiring practices, campaign workers inside the polling center talking to students waiting to vote. The Shadiness Factor page.	+ 10. ["Sword and Sandals"], a local secret society. ["Rob Roy"] getting ["Winter 2005 ASUCD Election/Disqualification Controversy" disqualified], ["Measure X"]/["Covell Village"] campaign on campus - pizza for vote trade, hiring practices, ["Norb Kumagai" campaign workers] inside the polling center talking to students waiting to vote. The Shadiness Factor page.

Shadiness Factor

MaxMikalonis — 2007-05-06 13:49:56

(quick edit)

Differences for Shadiness Factor

Deletions are marked with - .	Additions are marked with +.
Line 15:	Line 15:
- 7. The ["Sterling University Vista Apartments"] Riot, ["Campus Crusade for Christ"], Steven Ostrowski trying to "take over" the Progressive Coalition	+ 7. The ["Sterling University Vista Apartments"] Riot, ["Campus Crusade for Christ"], Steven Ostrowski trying to "take over" the ["Progressive Coalition"]

Shadiness Factor

StevenDaubert — 2007-05-05 23:48:37

mmmm sweet linkage

Differences for Shadiness Factor

Deletions are marked with - .	Additions are marked with +.
Line 12:	Line 12:
- 4. ["Procrastinating" Dog Ate Your Homework] Shady, ["TAPS"], the 'Halloween Headquarters' store that sprung up in ["Davis Manor"].	+ 4. ["Procrastinating" Dog Ate Your Homework] Shady, ["TAPS"], the ["Halloween Headquarters"] store that sprung up in ["Davis Manor"].

Shadiness Factor

EvanChait — 2007-02-11 00:19:48

Differences for Shadiness Factor

Deletions are marked with - .	Additions are marked with +.
Line 179:	Line 179:
	+ *what does religion have to do with the fraternity? aepi is considered a social fraternity, not a religious one. --["EvanChait"]

Shadiness Factor

EvanChait — 2007-02-11 00:16:47

It is a fraternity not a frat

Differences for Shadiness Factor

Deletions are marked with - .	Additions are marked with +.
Line 10:	Line 10:
- 2. Religious Frats (ie. ["Alpha Gamma Omega" AGO] and ["Alpha Epsilon Pi" AEPi]), ["Davis411"].com, [http://www.ljdrama.org/ LiveJournal drama].	+ 2. Religious Fraternities (ie. ["Alpha Gamma Omega" AGO] and ["Alpha Epsilon Pi" AEPi]), ["Davis411"].com, [http://www.ljdrama.org/ LiveJournal drama].

Shadiness Factor

SpammedDavisite — 2007-02-03 20:03:53

FCA Spam

Differences for Shadiness Factor

Deletions are marked with - .	Additions are marked with +.
Line 16:	Line 16:
- 8. ["Campaigning in Dorms Controversy"], advertising via sticking ads on bikes (stop this abomination now).	+ 8. ["Campaigning in Dorms Controversy"], advertising via sticking ads on bikes (stop this abomination now). ["Fischer, Carrillo & Associates"] advertising services via spam.

Shadiness Factor

SteveOstrowski — 2007-01-21 17:26:26

Comment added.

Differences for Shadiness Factor

Deletions are marked with - .	Additions are marked with +.
Line 179:	Line 179:
	+ ------ + ''2007-01-21 17:26:26'' [[nbsp]] Oh come on, you've always wanted to get sued at least once. --["SteveOstrowski"]

Shadiness Factor

JosephBleckman — 2007-01-21 17:22:39

Differences for Shadiness Factor

Deletions are marked with - .	Additions are marked with +.
Line 17:	Line 17:
- 9. ["LaRouche" LaRouche cultists], --X ["Mr. Chan's"] ["Chinese Food"] X--, ["ASUCD"] religious political ["Christian Democratic Party" parties].	+ 9. ["LaRouche" LaRouche cultists], --X ["Mr. Chan's"] ["Chinese Food"] X--, ["ASUCD"] religious political ["Christian Democratic Party" parties], ["Steve Ostrowski" sueing your friends].

Shadiness Factor

MaxMikalonis — 2006-12-14 17:10:02

Differences for Shadiness Factor

Deletions are marked with - .	Additions are marked with +.
Line 178:	Line 178:
	+ *Hence why it has only a two. Its just a little more shady than a sunny day on the quad, and thats only because it is indoors and not outside. --["MaxMikalonis"]

Shadiness Factor

EricFriedman — 2006-12-14 16:59:42

Comment added.

Differences for Shadiness Factor

Deletions are marked with - .	Additions are marked with +.
Line 176:	Line 176:
	+ ------ + ''2006-12-14 16:59:42'' [[nbsp]] Actually, AEPi is not religious at all, it's just a collection of mostly secular jewish college students. Most of our brothers are not religious and we even have a catholic brother! --["EricFriedman"]

Shadiness Factor

SteveOstrowski — 2006-12-12 16:26:01

Comment added.

Differences for Shadiness Factor

Deletions are marked with - .	Additions are marked with +.
Line 174:	Line 174:
	+ ------ + ''2006-12-12 16:26:01'' [[nbsp]] I don't see how it is shady to take over the Progressive Coalition, I mean who wouldn't? --["SteveOstrowski"]

Shadiness Factor

EdwinSaada — 2006-12-12 15:29:09

link edit, - wanted

Differences for Shadiness Factor

Deletions are marked with - .	Additions are marked with +.
Line 107:	Line 107:
- ''2005-03-21 05:21:12'' [[nbsp]] Phil is a ["Davis Mount Rushmore"]-ee! --["KrisFricke"]	+ ''2005-03-21 05:21:12'' [[nbsp]] Phil is a ["Glossary" Davis Mount Rushmore]-ee! --["KrisFricke"]

Shadiness Factor

PaulHarms — 2006-12-11 08:50:16

Ostrowski/ACT shadiness, round 1

Differences for Shadiness Factor

Deletions are marked with - .	Additions are marked with +.
Line 15:	Line 15:
- 7. The ["Sterling University Vista Apartments"] Riot, ["Campus Crusade for Christ"]	+ 7. The ["Sterling University Vista Apartments"] Riot, ["Campus Crusade for Christ"], Steven Ostrowski trying to "take over" the Progressive Coalition

Shadiness Factor

PaulHarms — 2006-12-10 10:35:23

Comment added.

Differences for Shadiness Factor

Deletions are marked with - .	Additions are marked with +.
Line 172:	Line 172:
	+ ------ + ''2006-12-10 10:35:23'' [[nbsp]] Steve's position on academic Senate is no longer shady, as the ASUCD Senate voted 6-5-1 to confirm the appointment. --["PaulHarms"]

Shadiness Factor

MatthewShannon — 2006-12-10 10:12:42

Not shady

Differences for Shadiness Factor

Deletions are marked with - .	Additions are marked with +.
Line 15:	Line 15:
- 7. The ["Sterling University Vista Apartments"] Riot, ["Campus Crusade for Christ"], ["Kai Savaree-Ruess"] Vs ["Andrew Peake"] at the ["Coffee House"]	+ 7. The ["Sterling University Vista Apartments"] Riot, ["Campus Crusade for Christ"]

Shadiness Factor

CaptainRush — 2006-12-10 09:27:31

kind of lame to nominate yourself as "shady"..

Differences for Shadiness Factor

Deletions are marked with - .	Additions are marked with +.
Line 17:	Line 17:
- 9. ["LaRouche" LaRouche cultists], --X ["Mr. Chan's"] ["Chinese Food"] X--, ["ASUCD"] religious political ["Christian Democratic Party" parties], ["Steve Ostrowski"] on ["Academic Senate"]	+ 9. ["LaRouche" LaRouche cultists], --X ["Mr. Chan's"] ["Chinese Food"] X--, ["ASUCD"] religious political ["Christian Democratic Party" parties].

Shadiness Factor

SteveOstrowski — 2006-12-10 03:03:45

Some ideas

Differences for Shadiness Factor

Deletions are marked with - .	Additions are marked with +.
Line 15:	Line 15:
- 7. The ["Sterling University Vista Apartments"] Riot, ["Campus Crusade for Christ"].	+ 7. The ["Sterling University Vista Apartments"] Riot, ["Campus Crusade for Christ"], ["Kai Savaree-Ruess"] Vs ["Andrew Peake"] at the ["Coffee House"]
Line 17:	Line 17:
- 9. ["LaRouche" LaRouche cultists], --X ["Mr. Chan's"] ["Chinese Food"] X--, ["ASUCD"] religious political ["Christian Democratic Party" parties].	+ 9. ["LaRouche" LaRouche cultists], --X ["Mr. Chan's"] ["Chinese Food"] X--, ["ASUCD"] religious political ["Christian Democratic Party" parties], ["Steve Ostrowski"] on ["Academic Senate"]

Shadiness Factor

PaulHarms — 2006-12-10 00:38:30

Mr Chan's is gone, facebook groups not that shady

Differences for Shadiness Factor

Deletions are marked with - .	Additions are marked with +.
Line 13:	Line 13:
- 5. The smell by the cereal in the ["Coffee House" CoHo], John Li of the ["Governance Task Force"].	+ 5. The smell by the cereal in the ["Coffee House" CoHo], John Li of the ["Governance Task Force"], ["Student Focus"] recruiting 1000+ [http://ucdavis.facebook.com/group.php?gid=2203923609 incoming freshmen on Facebook], or ["LEAD"] using the same tactic for two years running although their secret groups are much smaller and may involve active freshmen inviting friends.
Line 17:	Line 17:
- 9. ["LaRouche" LaRouche cultists], ["Mr. Chan's"] ["Chinese Food"], ["Student Focus"] recruiting 1000+ [http://ucdavis.facebook.com/group.php?gid=2203923609 incoming freshmen on Facebook], or ["LEAD"] using the same tactic for two years running although their secret groups are much smaller and may involve active freshmen inviting friends, ["ASUCD"] religious political ["Christian Democratic Party" parties].	+ 9. ["LaRouche" LaRouche cultists], --X ["Mr. Chan's"] ["Chinese Food"] X--, ["ASUCD"] religious political ["Christian Democratic Party" parties].

Shadiness Factor

PaulHarms — 2006-08-10 17:06:32

Differences for Shadiness Factor

Deletions are marked with - .	Additions are marked with +.
Line 151:	Line 151:
- I'm asking you to '''help me''' support LEAD and LEAD's freshman candidate Ravi Deepak (he lives on Malcom 2 in Segundo) in this ASUCD election. (http://elections.ucdavis.edu)	+ I'm asking you to help me support LEAD and LEAD's freshman candidate Ravi Deepak (he lives on Malcom 2 in Segundo) in this ASUCD election. (http://elections.ucdavis.edu)
Line 153:	Line 153:
- LEAD is committed to both progressive values in our campus community and fiscal responsibility within ASUCD. LEAD fights for student rights, for your rights, when the administration, City of Davis, and our goverment try to act against our best interests.	+ L'''EA'''D is commi'''t'''ted to '''b'''oth progressive v'''a'''lues in our campus community and fiscal responsi'''bi'''lity within ASUCD. L'''E'''AD fight'''s''' for student rights, for your rights, when the admi'''n'''istrati'''o'''n, City of Davis, and our goverment try to act against our best interests.
Line 155:	Line 155:
- If everybody on this group could get two of their friends to vote LEAD tonight, right now, that would bring us an extra 600 votes! Even if together '''we''' can only turn out an extra 100 votes tonight, that would make a huge impact on this election with its low voter turnout.	+ If everybody on this group could get t'''w'''o of their friends to vote LEAD tonight, right now, that would bring us an extra 600 votes! Even if together we can only turn out an extra 100 votes tonight, that would make a huge impact on this election with its low voter turnout.
Line 157:	Line 157:
- '''Some of us''' might not have had any direct contact with LEAD yet. Some of us, like me, '''owe''' a lot to LEAD for the opportunities we've had at UCD in the past months. Whichever is true, it's time for us to support the candidates that support freshmen.	+ Some of us might not have had any direct contact with LEAD yet. Some of us, like me, owe a lot to LEAD for the opportunities we've had at UCD in the past months. Whichever is true, it's time for us to support the candidates that support freshmen.

Shadiness Factor

JosephBleckman — 2006-08-09 23:08:10

Have I doven to the core of your sinster sinsterness, Mr. Sinister?

Differences for Shadiness Factor

Deletions are marked with - .	Additions are marked with +.
Line 151:	Line 151:
- I'm asking you to help me support LEAD and LEAD's freshman candidate Ravi Deepak (he lives on Malcom 2 in Segundo) in this ASUCD election. (http://elections.ucdavis.edu)	+ I'm asking you to '''help me''' support LEAD and LEAD's freshman candidate Ravi Deepak (he lives on Malcom 2 in Segundo) in this ASUCD election. (http://elections.ucdavis.edu)
Line 155:	Line 155:
- If everybody on this group could get two of their friends to vote LEAD tonight, right now, that would bring us an extra 600 votes! Even if together we can only turn out an extra 100 votes tonight, that would make a huge impact on this election with its low voter turnout.	+ If everybody on this group could get two of their friends to vote LEAD tonight, right now, that would bring us an extra 600 votes! Even if together '''we''' can only turn out an extra 100 votes tonight, that would make a huge impact on this election with its low voter turnout.
Line 157:	Line 157:
- Some of us might not have had any direct contact with LEAD yet. Some of us, like me, owe a lot to LEAD for the opportunities we've had at UCD in the past months. Whichever is true, it's time for us to support the candidates that support freshmen.	+ '''Some of us''' might not have had any direct contact with LEAD yet. Some of us, like me, '''owe''' a lot to LEAD for the opportunities we've had at UCD in the past months. Whichever is true, it's time for us to support the candidates that support freshmen.

Shadiness Factor

PaulHarms — 2006-08-09 22:33:38

the truth, the whole truth, and way too much of the truth

Differences for Shadiness Factor

Deletions are marked with - .	Additions are marked with +.
Line 147:	Line 147:
	+ * Time to cut the cloak and dagger BS. Here's the facebook message that earns me a shadiness factor of 9: + + From one freshman to another, I'm asking for your help. + + I'm asking you to help me support LEAD and LEAD's freshman candidate Ravi Deepak (he lives on Malcom 2 in Segundo) in this ASUCD election. (http://elections.ucdavis.edu) + + LEAD is committed to both progressive values in our campus community and fiscal responsibility within ASUCD. LEAD fights for student rights, for your rights, when the administration, City of Davis, and our goverment try to act against our best interests. + + If everybody on this group could get two of their friends to vote LEAD tonight, right now, that would bring us an extra 600 votes! Even if together we can only turn out an extra 100 votes tonight, that would make a huge impact on this election with its low voter turnout. + + Some of us might not have had any direct contact with LEAD yet. Some of us, like me, owe a lot to LEAD for the opportunities we've had at UCD in the past months. Whichever is true, it's time for us to support the candidates that support freshmen. + + So please, please, please get at least 2 of your friends to vote at http://elections.ucdavis.edu + + 3 Friends would be even better. Or 4. Or your entire floor, if you're one of those overacheiving types :-) + + Thanks all. + + -Paul Harms + LEAD Campaign Treasure, + Freshman from Ryerson 515 (Segundo) + + (Bonus points to anyone who can find ALL 4 SUBLIMINAL MIND CONTROL COMMANDS in my sinister message). + + -["PaulHarms" Shady H]

Shadiness Factor

SteveOstrowski — 2006-08-09 19:15:39

Comment added.

Differences for Shadiness Factor

Deletions are marked with - .	Additions are marked with +.
Line 145:	Line 145:
	+ ------ + ''2006-08-09 20:15:39'' [[nbsp]] The shadiness is inviting mass amounts of freshmen simply to fill up groups and order them to vote for certain candidates without really interacting with them. I think that might have been the original concern. --["SteveOstrowski"]

Shadiness Factor

JamesSchwab — 2006-08-09 18:10:44

Shady is as shady does

Differences for Shadiness Factor

Deletions are marked with - .	Additions are marked with +.
Line 18:	Line 18:
- 10. ["Sword and Sandals"], a local secret society. ["Rob Roy"] getting ["Winter 2005 ASUCD Election/Disqualification Controversy" disqualified], ["Measure X"]/["Covell Village"] campaign on campus - pizza for vote trade, hiring practices, campaign workers inside the polling center talking to students waiting to vote.	+ 10. ["Sword and Sandals"], a local secret society. ["Rob Roy"] getting ["Winter 2005 ASUCD Election/Disqualification Controversy" disqualified], ["Measure X"]/["Covell Village"] campaign on campus - pizza for vote trade, hiring practices, campaign workers inside the polling center talking to students waiting to vote. The Shadiness Factor page.
Line 144:	Line 144:
	+ * I'm going to start calling you Slim Shady Harms ["JimSchwab"]

Shadiness Factor

PaulHarms — 2006-08-09 17:26:03

i am sarcastic

Differences for Shadiness Factor

Deletions are marked with - .	Additions are marked with +.
Line 143:	Line 143:
- ''2006-08-09 18:19:06'' [[nbsp]] Wow, my old LEAD Freshmen 2009 facebook group made the Shady List! Yeah, that was hella shady. Add that to the list of my all-time best sinister plans. I'd've gotten away with it, too, if it weren't for you meddling kids, and that dumb dog of yours too ;-) --["PaulHarms"]	+ ''2006-08-09 18:19:06'' [[nbsp]] Wow, my old LEAD Freshmen 2009 facebook group made the Shady List! Yeah, that was hella shady. Add that to the list of my all-time best sinister plans. I'd've gotten away with it, too, if it weren't for you meddling kids, and [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Scooby_doo#Scooby-Doo_in_popular_culture that dumb dog of yours] ;-) --["PaulHarms"]

Shadiness Factor

PaulHarms — 2006-08-09 17:19:06

Comment added.

Differences for Shadiness Factor

Deletions are marked with - .	Additions are marked with +.
Line 142:	Line 142:
	+ ------ + ''2006-08-09 18:19:06'' [[nbsp]] Wow, my old LEAD Freshmen 2009 facebook group made the Shady List! Yeah, that was hella shady. Add that to the list of my all-time best sinister plans. I'd've gotten away with it, too, if it weren't for you meddling kids, and that dumb dog of yours too ;-) --["PaulHarms"]

Shadiness Factor

KarlMogel — 2006-08-09 15:51:32

Comment added.

Differences for Shadiness Factor

Deletions are marked with - .	Additions are marked with +.
Line 140:	Line 140:
	+ ------ + ''2006-08-09 16:51:32'' [[nbsp]] Why, ''Natural Log'' of course! --["KarlMogel"]

Shadiness Factor

TomNelson — 2006-08-09 15:26:34

Redirecting links to appropriate pages, grammar

Differences for Shadiness Factor

Deletions are marked with - .	Additions are marked with +.
Line 1:	Line 1:
- Shadiness Factor: A Unit of Measure that Rates an individual/organization/action that uses Shady (Hidden/Secretive/Semi-Unlawful) means to accomplish a task. It's one of many ["Wiki Rating Systems"] developed on this wiki.	+ Shadiness Factor: A unit of measure that rates an individual/organization/action that uses shady (hidden/secretive/semi-unlawful) means to accomplish a task. It's one of many ["Wiki Rating Systems"] developed on this wiki.
Line 3:	Line 3:
- Many Things can be referred to as Shady, but what does this really mean?	+ Many things can be referred to as "Shady", but what does this really mean?
Line 5:	Line 5:
- Shadiness is a Rating System of 1 to 10 (from least shady to most shady)	+ Shadiness has a rating system of 1 to 10 (from least shady to most shady).
Line 9:	Line 9:
- 1. Playing frisbee on ["the Quad"] (on a sunny day, of course) - 2. Religious Frats (ie. ["Alpha Gamma Omega" AGO] and ["Alpha Epsilon Pi" AEPi]), ["Davis411"].com, [http://www.ljdrama.org/ LiveJournal drama] - 3. ["Lamargate"], ["Midget Cop"], ["Students for an Orwellian Society"] - 4. ["Procrastinating" Dog Ate Your Homework] Shady, ["TAPS"], the 'Halloween Headquarters' store that sprung up in ["Davis Manor"] - 5. The smell by the cereal in the ["Coffee House" CoHo], John Li of the ["Governance Task Force"] - 6. ["ASUCD Open Government" Plasma Screen TVs] in the ["Coffee House" CoHo], ["Kalen Gallagher"] saying ["Choice Voting"] is a "disease" - 7. The ["Sterling University Vista Apartments"] Riot, ["Campus Crusade for Christ"] - 8. ["Campaigning in Dorms Controversy"] advertising via sticking ads on bikes (stop this abomination now) - 9. ["LaRouche" LaRouche cultists], ["Mr. Chan's"] ["Chinese Food"], [http://ucdavis.facebook.com/group.php?gid=2203923609 Student Focus recruiting 1000+ incoming freshmen on Facebook], or ["LEAD"] doing the same tactic for two years running although their secret groups are much smaller and may involve active freshmen inviting friends, ["ASUCD"] religious political ["SteveOstrowski" parties]. - 10. ["Sword and Sandals"], local secret society. ["Rob Roy"] getting ["Elections Committee scandal" disqualified], ["Measure X"]/["Covell Village"] campaign on campus - pizza for vote trade, hiring practices, campaign workers inside the polling center talking to students waiting to vote.	+ 1. Playing frisbee on ["the Quad"] (on a sunny day, of course). + 2. Religious Frats (ie. ["Alpha Gamma Omega" AGO] and ["Alpha Epsilon Pi" AEPi]), ["Davis411"].com, [http://www.ljdrama.org/ LiveJournal drama]. + 3. ["Lamargate"], ["Midget Cop"], ["Students for an Orwellian Society"]. + 4. ["Procrastinating" Dog Ate Your Homework] Shady, ["TAPS"], the 'Halloween Headquarters' store that sprung up in ["Davis Manor"]. + 5. The smell by the cereal in the ["Coffee House" CoHo], John Li of the ["Governance Task Force"]. + 6. ["ASUCD Open Government" Plasma Screen TVs] in the ["Coffee House" CoHo], ["Kalen Gallagher"] saying ["Choice Voting"] is a "disease". + 7. The ["Sterling University Vista Apartments"] Riot, ["Campus Crusade for Christ"]. + 8. ["Campaigning in Dorms Controversy"], advertising via sticking ads on bikes (stop this abomination now). + 9. ["LaRouche" LaRouche cultists], ["Mr. Chan's"] ["Chinese Food"], ["Student Focus"] recruiting 1000+ [http://ucdavis.facebook.com/group.php?gid=2203923609 incoming freshmen on Facebook], or ["LEAD"] using the same tactic for two years running although their secret groups are much smaller and may involve active freshmen inviting friends, ["ASUCD"] religious political ["Christian Democratic Party" parties]. + 10. ["Sword and Sandals"], a local secret society. ["Rob Roy"] getting ["Winter 2005 ASUCD Election/Disqualification Controversy" disqualified], ["Measure X"]/["Covell Village"] campaign on campus - pizza for vote trade, hiring practices, campaign workers inside the polling center talking to students waiting to vote.

Shadiness Factor

JosephBleckman — 2006-08-09 12:56:32

Differences for Shadiness Factor

Deletions are marked with - .	Additions are marked with +.
Line 17:	Line 17:
- 9. ["LaRouche" LaRouche cultists], ["Mr. Chan's"] ["Chinese Food"], [http://ucdavis.facebook.com/group.php?gid=2203923609 Student Focus recruiting 1000+ incoming freshmen on Facebook], or ["LEAD"] doing the same tactic for two years running although their groups are much smaller and involve active freshmen inviting friends, ["ASUCD"] religious political parties.	+ 9. ["LaRouche" LaRouche cultists], ["Mr. Chan's"] ["Chinese Food"], [http://ucdavis.facebook.com/group.php?gid=2203923609 Student Focus recruiting 1000+ incoming freshmen on Facebook], or ["LEAD"] doing the same tactic for two years running although their secret groups are much smaller and may involve active freshmen inviting friends, ["ASUCD"] religious political ["SteveOstrowski" parties].

Shadiness Factor

SteveOstrowski — 2006-08-09 12:40:17

Is facebook shadiness really on the level of 9?

Differences for Shadiness Factor

Deletions are marked with - .	Additions are marked with +.
Line 17:	Line 17:
- 9. ["LaRouche" LaRouche cultists], ["Mr. Chan's"] ["Chinese Food"], [http://ucdavis.facebook.com/group.php?gid=2203923609 Student Focus recruiting 1000 incoming freshmen on Facebook], or ["L.E.A.D"] doing the same tactic for two years running although their groups are much smaller and involve active freshmen inviting friends.	+ 9. ["LaRouche" LaRouche cultists], ["Mr. Chan's"] ["Chinese Food"], [http://ucdavis.facebook.com/group.php?gid=2203923609 Student Focus recruiting 1000+ incoming freshmen on Facebook], or ["LEAD"] doing the same tactic for two years running although their groups are much smaller and involve active freshmen inviting friends, ["ASUCD"] religious political parties.

Shadiness Factor

JamesSchwab — 2006-08-09 06:30:51

Differences for Shadiness Factor

Deletions are marked with - .	Additions are marked with +.
Line 17:	Line 17:
- 9. ["LaRouche" LaRouche cultists], ["Mr. Chan's"] ["Chinese Food"], [http://ucdavis.facebook.com/group.php?gid=2203923609 Student Focus recruiting 1000 incoming freshmen on Facebook], or L.E.A.D doing the same tactic for two years running.	+ 9. ["LaRouche" LaRouche cultists], ["Mr. Chan's"] ["Chinese Food"], [http://ucdavis.facebook.com/group.php?gid=2203923609 Student Focus recruiting 1000 incoming freshmen on Facebook], or ["L.E.A.D"] doing the same tactic for two years running although their groups are much smaller and involve active freshmen inviting friends.

Shadiness Factor

JosephBleckman — 2006-08-08 23:52:33

Focus was rather forced into this, after not fighting back last year.

Differences for Shadiness Factor

Deletions are marked with - .	Additions are marked with +.
Line 17:	Line 17:
- 9. ["LaRouche" LaRouche cultists], ["Mr. Chan's"] ["Chinese Food"], [http://ucdavis.facebook.com/group.php?gid=2203923609 Student Focus recruiting 1000 incoming freshmen on Facebook].	+ 9. ["LaRouche" LaRouche cultists], ["Mr. Chan's"] ["Chinese Food"], [http://ucdavis.facebook.com/group.php?gid=2203923609 Student Focus recruiting 1000 incoming freshmen on Facebook], or L.E.A.D doing the same tactic for two years running.

Shadiness Factor

TravisGrathwell — 2006-08-08 23:33:56

i fear bringing this page from the dead

Differences for Shadiness Factor

Deletions are marked with - .	Additions are marked with +.
Line 17:	Line 17:
- 9. ["LaRouche" LaRouche cultists], ["Mr. Chan's"] ["Chinese Food"].	+ 9. ["LaRouche" LaRouche cultists], ["Mr. Chan's"] ["Chinese Food"], [http://ucdavis.facebook.com/group.php?gid=2203923609 Student Focus recruiting 1000 incoming freshmen on Facebook].
Line 21:	Line 21:
- ["AshleyOrsaba"] has a different idea of what is shady.	+ ["AshleyOrsaba"] has a different idea of what is shady.

Shadiness Factor

MatthewTom — 2006-02-10 11:58:38

Comment added.

Differences for Shadiness Factor

Deletions are marked with - .	Additions are marked with +.
Line 138:	Line 138:
	+ ------ + ''2006-02-10 12:58:38'' [[nbsp]] Is this shadiness rating system on a simple increasing scale, or is it on a log scale (i.e. LaRouche cultists are a million times shadier than frisbee players on the quad)? --["MatthewTom"]

Shadiness Factor

SteveDavison — 2005-11-07 18:28:22

Comment added.

Differences for Shadiness Factor

Deletions are marked with - .	Additions are marked with +.
Line 136:	Line 136:
	+ ------ + ''2005-11-07 19:28:22'' [[nbsp]] I think the list needs to be inverted, with 10 at the top and 1 at the bottom. --["SteveDavison"]

Shadiness Factor

KarlMogel — 2005-11-07 16:16:14

Comment added.

Differences for Shadiness Factor

Deletions are marked with - .	Additions are marked with +.
Line 134:	Line 134:
	+ ------ + ''2005-11-07 17:16:14'' [[nbsp]] removed Measure X entry in category 9 since it was upgraded to category 10 --["KarlMogel"]

Shadiness Factor

KarlMogel — 2005-11-07 16:15:23

Differences for Shadiness Factor

Deletions are marked with - .	Additions are marked with +.
Line 17:	Line 17:
- 9. ["LaRouche" LaRouche cultists], ["Mr. Chan's"] ["Chinese Food"], Trading pizza for votes for ["Measure X"]. - 10. ["Sword and Sandals"], local secret society. ["Rob Roy"] getting ["Elections Committee scandal" disqualified], ["Covell Village"] campaign on campus - pizza for vote trade, hiring practices, campaign workers inside the polling center talking to students waiting to vote.	+ 9. ["LaRouche" LaRouche cultists], ["Mr. Chan's"] ["Chinese Food"]. + 10. ["Sword and Sandals"], local secret society. ["Rob Roy"] getting ["Elections Committee scandal" disqualified], ["Measure X"]/["Covell Village"] campaign on campus - pizza for vote trade, hiring practices, campaign workers inside the polling center talking to students waiting to vote.

Shadiness Factor

AllisonEriksen — 2005-11-02 09:46:34

Comment added.

Differences for Shadiness Factor

Deletions are marked with - .	Additions are marked with +.
Line 132:	Line 132:
	+ ------ + ''2005-11-02 10:46:34'' [[nbsp]] TAPS is definitely shadier than that, and what about that damn 'firetruck'? --["AllisonEriksen"]

Shadiness Factor

SharlaDaly — 2005-11-02 07:26:27

Comment added.

Differences for Shadiness Factor

Deletions are marked with - .	Additions are marked with +.
Line 130:	Line 130:
	+ ------ + ''2005-11-02 08:26:27'' [[nbsp]] Covell Village is upgraded to 10 after the last two days of illegal campaign practices on campus. --["SharlaDaly"]

Shadiness Factor

SharlaDaly — 2005-11-02 07:25:16

Differences for Shadiness Factor

Deletions are marked with - .	Additions are marked with +.
Line 12:	Line 12:
- 4. ["Procrastinating" Dog Ate Your Homework] Shady, ["TAPS"], ["Covell Village"] mailings, the 'Halloween Headquarters' store that sprung up in ["Davis Manor"]	+ 4. ["Procrastinating" Dog Ate Your Homework] Shady, ["TAPS"], the 'Halloween Headquarters' store that sprung up in ["Davis Manor"]
Line 18:	Line 18:
- 10. ["Sword and Sandals"], local secret society. ["Rob Roy"] getting ["Elections Committee scandal" disqualified]	+ 10. ["Sword and Sandals"], local secret society. ["Rob Roy"] getting ["Elections Committee scandal" disqualified], ["Covell Village"] campaign on campus - pizza for vote trade, hiring practices, campaign workers inside the polling center talking to students waiting to vote.

Shadiness Factor

KarlMogel — 2005-11-02 04:50:29

pizza is so shady

Differences for Shadiness Factor

Deletions are marked with - .	Additions are marked with +.
Line 17:	Line 17:
- 9. ["LaRouche" LaRouche cultists], ["Mr. Chan's"] ["Chinese Food"].	+ 9. ["LaRouche" LaRouche cultists], ["Mr. Chan's"] ["Chinese Food"], Trading pizza for votes for ["Measure X"].

Shadiness Factor

AnonEmuss — 2005-10-28 19:30:29

Differences for Shadiness Factor

Deletions are marked with - .	Additions are marked with +.
Line 16:	Line 16:
- 8. ["Campaigning in Dorms Controversy"]	+ 8. ["Campaigning in Dorms Controversy"] advertising via sticking ads on bikes (stop this abomination now)

Shadiness Factor

TravisGrathwell — 2005-10-28 16:42:57

addition

Differences for Shadiness Factor

Deletions are marked with - .	Additions are marked with +.
Line 12:	Line 12:
- 4. ["Procrastinating" Dog Ate Your Homework] Shady, ["TAPS"], ["Covell Village"] mailings	+ 4. ["Procrastinating" Dog Ate Your Homework] Shady, ["TAPS"], ["Covell Village"] mailings, the 'Halloween Headquarters' store that sprung up in ["Davis Manor"]

Shadiness Factor

BrentLaabs — 2005-08-29 17:54:22

Comment added.

Differences for Shadiness Factor

Deletions are marked with - .	Additions are marked with +.
Line 128:	Line 128:
	+ ------ + ''2005-08-29 18:54:22'' [[nbsp]] Well, he's less shady than ["TAPS"], which is an organization that gives parking tickets. And far less shady than the Sterling Riots. I'd say that he's doing pretty well for law enforcement. --["BrentLaabs"]

Shadiness Factor

AllisonEriksen — 2005-08-29 14:00:46

Differences for Shadiness Factor

Deletions are marked with - .	Additions are marked with +.
Line 126:	Line 126:
	+ ------ + ''2005-08-29 14:57:45'' [[nbsp]] I don't think the Midget Cop is shady at all. One of my friends met him and said that he was very nice and absolutely NOT shady. --["AllisonEriksen"]

Shadiness Factor

RocksandDirt — 2005-07-19 17:12:51

Comment added.

Differences for Shadiness Factor

Deletions are marked with - .	Additions are marked with +.
Line 124:	Line 124:
	+ ------ + ''2005-07-19 18:12:51'' [[nbsp]] I got quite a kick out of this page, though it is so ucd-kid centric that I don't understand a lot of it. --["RocksandDirt"]

Shadiness Factor

NiareeHopelian — 2005-06-12 16:40:53

Differences for Shadiness Factor

Deletions are marked with - .	Additions are marked with +.
Line 1:	Line 1:
- Shadiness Factor: A Unit of Measure that Rates an individual/organization/action that uses Shady(Hidden/Secretive/Semi-Unlawful) means to accomplish a task. It's one of many ["Wiki Rating Systems"] developed on this wiki.	+ Shadiness Factor: A Unit of Measure that Rates an individual/organization/action that uses Shady (Hidden/Secretive/Semi-Unlawful) means to accomplish a task. It's one of many ["Wiki Rating Systems"] developed on this wiki.

Shadiness Factor

MichaelGiardina — 2005-06-12 15:27:23

Differences for Shadiness Factor

Deletions are marked with - .	Additions are marked with +.
Line 123:	Line 123:
- ''2005-06-12 16:27:03'' [[nbsp]] I think the ["Shadiness Factor"] page is pretty shady. (as well as my link to it) --["MichaelGiardina"]	+ ''2005-06-12 16:27:03'' [[nbsp]] I think the ["Shadiness Factor"] page is pretty shady. --["MichaelGiardina"]

Shadiness Factor

MichaelGiardina — 2005-06-12 15:27:03

Comment added.

Differences for Shadiness Factor

Deletions are marked with - .	Additions are marked with +.
Line 122:	Line 122:
	+ ------ + ''2005-06-12 16:27:03'' [[nbsp]] I think the ["Shadiness Factor"] page is pretty shady. (as well as my link to it) --["MichaelGiardina"]

Shadiness Factor

GeorgeLewis — 2005-05-02 06:57:23

don't think the Sigma Chi page is shady at all, there is an open discussion

Differences for Shadiness Factor

Deletions are marked with - .	Additions are marked with +.
Line 17:	Line 17:
- 9. ["LaRouche" LaRouche cultists], ["Mr. Chan's"] ["Chinese Food"], The ["Sigma Chi"] page on Davis Wiki.	+ 9. ["LaRouche" LaRouche cultists], ["Mr. Chan's"] ["Chinese Food"].

Shadiness Factor

RobPedersen — 2005-05-01 23:37:58

Differences for Shadiness Factor

Deletions are marked with - .	Additions are marked with +.
Line 10:	Line 10:
- 2. Religious Frats (ie. ["Alpha Gamma Omega" AGO] and ["Alpha Epsilon Pi" AEPi]), ["Davis411"].com, ["http://www.ljdrama.org/" LiveJournal drama]	+ 2. Religious Frats (ie. ["Alpha Gamma Omega" AGO] and ["Alpha Epsilon Pi" AEPi]), ["Davis411"].com, [http://www.ljdrama.org/ LiveJournal drama]

Shadiness Factor

RobPedersen — 2005-05-01 23:37:19

Differences for Shadiness Factor

Deletions are marked with - .	Additions are marked with +.
Line 10:	Line 10:
- 2. Religious Frats (ie. ["Alpha Gamma Omega" AGO] and ["Alpha Epsilon Pi" AEPi]), ["Davis411"].com	+ 2. Religious Frats (ie. ["Alpha Gamma Omega" AGO] and ["Alpha Epsilon Pi" AEPi]), ["Davis411"].com, ["http://www.ljdrama.org/" LiveJournal drama]

Shadiness Factor

TravisGrathwell — 2005-04-04 12:59:19

please, lets be reasonable now

Differences for Shadiness Factor

Deletions are marked with - .	Additions are marked with +.
Line 17:	Line 17:
- 9. ["LaRouche" LaRouche cultists], ["Mr. Chan's"] ["Chinese Food"], - 10. ["Sword and Sandals"], local secret society. ["Rob Roy"] getting ["Elections Committee scandal" disqualified], The ["Sigma Chi"] page on Davis Wiki.	+ 9. ["LaRouche" LaRouche cultists], ["Mr. Chan's"] ["Chinese Food"], The ["Sigma Chi"] page on Davis Wiki. + 10. ["Sword and Sandals"], local secret society. ["Rob Roy"] getting ["Elections Committee scandal" disqualified]

Shadiness Factor

MarkKlebanov — 2005-04-04 12:48:28

Differences for Shadiness Factor

Deletions are marked with - .	Additions are marked with +.
Line 18:	Line 18:
- 10. ["Sword and Sandals"], local secret society. ["Rob Roy"] getting ["Elections Committee scandal" disqualified].	+ 10. ["Sword and Sandals"], local secret society. ["Rob Roy"] getting ["Elections Committee scandal" disqualified], The ["Sigma Chi"] page on Davis Wiki.

Shadiness Factor

JimSchwab — 2005-03-22 00:01:54

Comment added.

Differences for Shadiness Factor

Deletions are marked with - .	Additions are marked with +.
Line 120:	Line 120:
	+ ------ + ''2005-03-22 00:01:54'' [[nbsp]] I saw him driving a patrol car last week. --["JimSchwab"]

Shadiness Factor

GeorgeLewis — 2005-03-21 23:31:24

Comment added.

Differences for Shadiness Factor

Deletions are marked with - .	Additions are marked with +.
Line 118:	Line 118:
	+ ------ + ''2005-03-21 23:31:24'' [[nbsp]] I had heard that he was no longer in Davis. Is this not true? --["GeorgeLewis"]

Shadiness Factor

KrisFricke — 2005-03-21 23:25:39

Comment added.

Differences for Shadiness Factor

Deletions are marked with - .	Additions are marked with +.
Line 116:	Line 116:
	+ ------ + ''2005-03-21 23:25:39'' [[nbsp]] I'm sure the man is in shape and I bet he puts a lot of effort into maintaining optimum fitness (possibly feeling he needs to prove himself -- napoleon complex?) -- but what I heard was that he couldn't do certain things -- I dunno maybe he had to jump over something or something -- and he was unable. I dunno I'm just saying that thats the creation myth I heard for his commission, if its not true than there's nothing shady. Also I want to disclaim that I by no means mean to sound patronizing of his condition here, its admirable that he won't let his physical handicap prevent him from doing what he wants and from what I hear he does a good job. --["KrisFricke"]

Shadiness Factor

JimSchwab — 2005-03-21 23:17:12

Comment added.

Differences for Shadiness Factor

Deletions are marked with - .	Additions are marked with +.
Line 114:	Line 114:
	+ ------ + ''2005-03-21 23:17:12'' [[nbsp]] I've saw him take down two football players outside of Cantina about two years ago....I dont think any of us could do that --["JimSchwab"]

Shadiness Factor

KrisFricke — 2005-03-21 23:03:43

Comment added.

Differences for Shadiness Factor

Deletions are marked with - .	Additions are marked with +.
Line 112:	Line 112:
	+ ------ + ''2005-03-21 23:03:43'' [[nbsp]] Yeah I was wondering about the midget cop too, but then I remembered -- he allegedly couldn't pass the physical requirements for the police force (being a midget and all), so he sued them -- pursuant to the lawsuit they allowed him to become a police officer. Equal opportunity for the handicapped is all good and well but the police and fire departments have physical standards for a reason, and its NOT to persecute the vertically challenged! --["KrisFricke"]

Shadiness Factor

GeorgeLewis — 2005-03-21 22:59:20

Comment added.

Differences for Shadiness Factor

Deletions are marked with - .	Additions are marked with +.
Line 110:	Line 110:
	+ ------ + ''2005-03-21 22:59:19'' [[nbsp]] I would say Lamargate is far more shady than either of those two...and I don't know why the midget cop is shady at all --["GeorgeLewis"]

Shadiness Factor

MarieHuynh — 2005-03-21 22:51:57

Comment added.

Differences for Shadiness Factor

Deletions are marked with - .	Additions are marked with +.
Line 108:	Line 108:
	+ ------ + ''2005-03-21 22:51:57'' [[nbsp]] how is Students for an Orwellian Society on equal shadiness as lamargate or midgetcop? --["MarieHuynh"]

Shadiness Factor

AshleyOrsaba — 2005-03-21 14:01:00

removed link by brent calling me "shady"

Differences for Shadiness Factor

Deletions are marked with - .	Additions are marked with +.
Line 21:	Line 21:
- ["AshleyOrsaba"] has a different idea of what is ["AshleyOrsaba" shady].	+ ["AshleyOrsaba"] has a different idea of what is shady.

Shadiness Factor

BrentLaabs — 2005-03-21 12:36:04

yanking good ideas from other lists; applying emosnail poll; changes up 4 debate

Differences for Shadiness Factor

Deletions are marked with - .	Additions are marked with +.
Line 7:	Line 7:
- Here's is an '''example''' of a shadiness factor scale to illustrate the concept of rating things as ''shaddy'' (''don't take this too seriously, this is just an example''):	+ Here's is an '''example''' of a shadiness factor scale to illustrate the concept of rating things as ''shady'' (don't take this too seriously, though; it's all for fun):
Line 10:	Line 10:
- 2. Religious Frats (ie. ["Alpha Gamma Omega" AGO] and ["Alpha Epsilon Pi" AEPi]) - 3. ["Lamargate"], ["Midget Cop"] - 4. ["Procrastinating" Dog Ate Your Homework] Shady, ["Covell Village"] mailings	+ 2. Religious Frats (ie. ["Alpha Gamma Omega" AGO] and ["Alpha Epsilon Pi" AEPi]), ["Davis411"].com + 3. ["Lamargate"], ["Midget Cop"], ["Students for an Orwellian Society"] + 4. ["Procrastinating" Dog Ate Your Homework] Shady, ["TAPS"], ["Covell Village"] mailings
Line 15:	Line 15:
- 7. The ["Sterling University Vista Apartments"] Riot - 8. ["Campaigning in Dorms Controversy"], ["Campus Crusade for Christ"] - 9. ["Mr. Chan's"] ["Chinese Food"], ["LaRouche" LaRouche cultists]	+ 7. The ["Sterling University Vista Apartments"] Riot, ["Campus Crusade for Christ"] + 8. ["Campaigning in Dorms Controversy"] + 9. ["LaRouche" LaRouche cultists], ["Mr. Chan's"] ["Chinese Food"],

Shadiness Factor

KrisFricke — 2005-03-21 05:21:12

Comment added.

Differences for Shadiness Factor

Deletions are marked with - .	Additions are marked with +.
Line 106:	Line 106:
	+ ------ + ''2005-03-21 05:21:12'' [[nbsp]] Phil is a ["Davis Mount Rushmore"]-ee! --["KrisFricke"]

Shadiness Factor

BrentLaabs — 2005-03-21 00:04:26

linked ashley's shadiness list.

Differences for Shadiness Factor

Deletions are marked with - .	Additions are marked with +.
Line 20:	Line 20:
	+ + ["AshleyOrsaba"] has a different idea of what is ["AshleyOrsaba" shady].

Shadiness Factor

PhilipNeustrom — 2005-03-20 23:58:29

removed my list as well, rephrased singular

Differences for Shadiness Factor

Deletions are marked with - .	Additions are marked with +.
Line 7:	Line 7:
- Here's are some '''examples''' of shadiness factor scales to illustrate the concept of rating things as ''shaddy'' (''don't take this too seriously, these are just examples''):	+ Here's is an '''example''' of a shadiness factor scale to illustrate the concept of rating things as ''shaddy'' (''don't take this too seriously, this is just an example''):
Line 19:	Line 19:
- - ---- - 1. ["The Davis Enterprise"]'s stories - 2. ["Murder Burger"] - 3. ["Students for an Orwellian Society"] - 4. The ["24 hour reading room"] at 3AM. - 5. ["Davis411"].com - 6. The number of ["Thai"] resturants in Davis - 7. ["Covell Village"] - 8. The ["40 ounce meal plan"], ["Dining Commons"]' food. - 9. ["Tweakers"] - 10. Someone stealing the ["Seymore the Seal"] from the ["Central Park"] carousel. - - ---- - -
Line 119:	Line 103:
- ------

Shadiness Factor

AshleyOrsaba — 2005-03-20 23:56:12

moving my list to my own page

Differences for Shadiness Factor

Deletions are marked with - .	Additions are marked with +.
Line 33:	Line 33:
- 1. The massive amounts of people wearing Ugg's - 2. all the ["EPA Superfund Site"]s around ["Davis"] - 3. ["Castilian Hall"] dorms - 4. ["Richards Underpass"] - 5. Classes where the professor deliberatly tries to fail people - 6. ["Davis Police Department"] - 7. Athletes getting better pass times than the rest of us. Come on they already get paid to attend as it is - 8. ["Sword and Sandals"] - 9. a vast portion of ASUCD - 10. ["TAPS"] - - Feel Free to add to existing lists or create new lists. - - [http://californiaaggie.com/article/?id=7949 Usage of the term in the Aggie].	+

Shadiness Factor

BrentLaabs — 2005-03-20 23:47:25

Comment added.

Differences for Shadiness Factor

Deletions are marked with - .	Additions are marked with +.
Line 132:	Line 132:
	+ ------ + ''2005-03-20 23:47:25'' [[nbsp]] Yeah, but it just doesn't feel right to remove your edits. There has to be someone that we all respect around here, and I wouldn't edit you unless we got a consensus around here. Whether you like it or not, you're not just any other person on this wiki. --["BrentLaabs"]

Shadiness Factor

PhilipNeustrom — 2005-03-20 22:50:33

minor reply to brent

Differences for Shadiness Factor

Deletions are marked with - .	Additions are marked with +.
Line 120:	Line 120:
	+ * Brent, you're always free to remove my edits.
Line 127:	Line 128:
- ["MarkKlebanov"], ["BrentLaabs"], ["AdamGerber"], ["RevChad"], ["KenBloom"]. ["KrisFricke"], ["JamesSchwab"], ["RishiTrivedi"], and ["PhillipNeustrom"] have all contributed to the first list. The other ones represent a single person's list.	+ ["MarkKlebanov"], ["BrentLaabs"], ["AdamGerber"], ["RevChad"], ["KenBloom"]. ["KrisFricke"], ["JamesSchwab"], ["RishiTrivedi"], and ["PhilipNeustrom"] have all contributed to the first list. The other ones represent a single person's list.
Line 131:	Line 132:
- ''2005-03-20 22:49:35'' [[nbsp]] i DID get your point. And for your information i DID delete my list, and then someone added it back on. Too bad there wasnt a way where we could have a real poll on wiki instead of it just being a few peoples opinions --["AshleyOrsaba"]

Shadiness Factor

AshleyOrsaba — 2005-03-20 22:49:35

Comment added.

Differences for Shadiness Factor

Deletions are marked with - .	Additions are marked with +.
Line 130:	Line 130:
	+ ------ + ''2005-03-20 22:49:35'' [[nbsp]] i DID get your point. And for your information i DID delete my list, and then someone added it back on. Too bad there wasnt a way where we could have a real poll on wiki instead of it just being a few peoples opinions --["AshleyOrsaba"]

Shadiness Factor

BrentLaabs — 2005-03-20 22:46:38

never use a comment when you need an edit, i guess.

Differences for Shadiness Factor

Deletions are marked with - .	Additions are marked with +.
Line 125:	Line 125:
- ''2005-03-20 22:45:19'' [[nbsp]] Not everything comes from emosnail That's correct. You all missed the point of what I was saying. More people worked on the first list: --["BrentLaabs"]	+ ''2005-03-20 22:45:19'' [[nbsp]] Not everything comes from emosnail That's correct. You all missed the point of what I was saying. More people worked on the first list: + + ["MarkKlebanov"], ["BrentLaabs"], ["AdamGerber"], ["RevChad"], ["KenBloom"]. ["KrisFricke"], ["JamesSchwab"], ["RishiTrivedi"], and ["PhillipNeustrom"] have all contributed to the first list. The other ones represent a single person's list. + + Can we edit those lists too? --["BrentLaabs"]

Shadiness Factor

BrentLaabs — 2005-03-20 22:45:19

Comment added.

Differences for Shadiness Factor

Deletions are marked with - .	Additions are marked with +.
Line 124:	Line 124:
	+ ------ + ''2005-03-20 22:45:19'' [[nbsp]] Not everything comes from emosnail That's correct. You all missed the point of what I was saying. More people worked on the first list: --["BrentLaabs"]

Shadiness Factor

JimSchwab — 2005-03-20 22:29:28

Comment added.

Differences for Shadiness Factor

Deletions are marked with - .	Additions are marked with +.
Line 122:	Line 122:
	+ ------ + ''2005-03-20 22:29:27'' [[nbsp]] Not all the things on the first list come from ["Emosnail"] --["JimSchwab"]

Shadiness Factor

AshleyOrsaba — 2005-03-20 22:26:48

Comment added.

Differences for Shadiness Factor

Deletions are marked with - .	Additions are marked with +.
Line 120:	Line 120:
	+ ------ + ''2005-03-20 22:26:48'' [[nbsp]] well i think then it sould say "Based on emosnail" or something b/c i'm sure i'm not the only one who didnt know the origin of the first list. --["AshleyOrsaba"]

Shadiness Factor

BrentLaabs — 2005-03-20 22:22:39

Comment added.

Differences for Shadiness Factor

Deletions are marked with - .	Additions are marked with +.
Line 118:	Line 118:
	+ ------ + ''2005-03-20 22:22:39'' [[nbsp]] I completely disagree with you because the top list does have more authority. It represents a consensus decision on each item. It represents polling at ["EMOSNAIL"]. Your list is not as important as any of the other lists. If you weren't an admin, I'd be editing you now. [[BR]][[BR]] If you want to have different lists, I'd prefer that they were about different things. ASUCD, stores in Davis, the administration. --["BrentLaabs"]

Shadiness Factor

GeorgeLewis — 2005-03-20 22:20:56

Comment added.

Differences for Shadiness Factor

Deletions are marked with - .	Additions are marked with +.
Line 116:	Line 116:
	+ ------ + ''2005-03-20 22:20:56'' [[nbsp]] Interesting. I still think there needs to be some sort of standardized ranking system. The original seemed fine to me. heh. oh well. --["GeorgeLewis"]

Shadiness Factor

AshleyOrsaba — 2005-03-20 21:55:55

Comment added.

Differences for Shadiness Factor

Deletions are marked with - .	Additions are marked with +.
Line 114:	Line 114:
	+ ------ + ''2005-03-20 21:55:55'' [[nbsp]] agreed. i like your take --["AshleyOrsaba"]