http://daviswiki.org/The_California_Aggie_Controversies/Stone_replyRecent Changes of the page "The California Aggie Controversies/Stone reply" on Davis Wiki.en-us http://daviswiki.org/The_California_Aggie_Controversies/Stone_reply2008-05-29 21:53:08JasonAller(quick edit) <div id="content" class="wikipage content"> Differences for The California Aggie Controversies/Stone reply<p><strong></strong></p><table> <tr> <td> <span> Deletions are marked with - . </span> </td> <td> <span> Additions are marked with +. </span> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> Line 32: </td> <td> Line 32: </td> </tr> <tr> <td> <span>-</span> Daniel Stone </td> <td> <span>+</span> <span>["</span>Daniel Stone<span>"]</span> </td> </tr> </table> </div> http://daviswiki.org/The_California_Aggie_Controversies/Stone_reply2008-05-27 21:31:10OscarSabino <div id="content" class="wikipage content"> Differences for The California Aggie Controversies/Stone reply<p><strong></strong></p><table> <tr> <td> <span> Deletions are marked with - . </span> </td> <td> <span> Additions are marked with +. </span> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> Line 1: </td> <td> Line 1: </td> </tr> <tr> <td> </td> <td> <span>+ Dear staff members,<br> + <br> + I wanted to inform everyone on a recent series of events within the editorial<br> + board and in the newsroom:<br> + <br> + On Jan. 31, The Aggie published an editorial regarding Chancellor Larry<br> + Vanderhoef and the circulating faculty petition of no confidence. The editorial,<br> + like all published by The Aggie was written and edited to reflect the collective<br> + opinion of The Aggie's editorial board.<br> + <br> + Later in the production process, I mildly altered the editorial to reflect a<br> + personal opinion, without the consent of the rest of the editorial board. The<br> + following day, upon being confronted by the board, I denied the allegations, a<br> + move which I deeply regret and for which I have appologized. Admittedly, it was<br> + a hefty mistake that questions my integrity, character and devotion to this<br> + editorial staff. I now have the difficult staff of rebuilding the trust of many<br> + editorial board and staff members.<br> + <br> + In an attempt to remedy the root problem, the board agreed we would republish<br> + the editorial with my appology on Thursday's editorial page.<br> + <br> + I would like to appologize to the entire staff for my lack of judgement and<br> + leadership in this situation. I work hard to ensure that The Aggie is a<br> + credible, reputable and trusted news source and I hope my momentary lack of<br> + judgement reflects poorly on neither the staff nor the paper.<br> + <br> + If you have further concerns about this situation, please speak to either me or<br> + Melissa in the newsroom.<br> + <br> + Respectfully,<br> + <br> + Daniel Stone<br> + Editor in Chief<br> + The California Aggie</span> </td> </tr> </table> </div>