This page is for discussing the contents of The Davis Enforcer.
This article was written entirely by the person who put out this publication, and it contains phrases such as "their funding is also somewhat of a mystery" and "it is unknown exactly what the Davis Enforcer intends to enforce" which were written by the individual involved and are probably inaccurate. I say we edit this article down to a solid paragraph describing simply what it is.
-
I agree. An extremely high shadiness factor and seemingly designed to manipulate people/perceptions. However, I suspect the paper itself will die fairly quickly. Perhaps just let the individual make his little crap pile then clean it up later? Trying to clean it up now will probably just egg him on.
-
Yup. At the very least, it's a publication and should have an entry. After that I don't really care. If it dies after one issue, it's documented, if it sticks around, it's now a decently formatted entry. In other words, I think I did the edits requested above. It's now a much less "mystery and magic" style entry and much more factual. Shall we delete this Talk page? —JabberWokky
-
I say leave the talk page for at least a week... the page may engender further discussion.
-
About what? (No, that's not a cutesy way or arguing, I'm honestly asking — what discussion about the entry might be actually productive?) —JabberWokky
-
Though a week has already passed, I am a bit surprised by that question because your past comments on various topics seem to indicate that most everything has a productive value, which I agree with on some level. Past history has shown that the individual who created The Davis Enforcer page basically likes to stir up the pot... I suspect that after it sits for a bit he'll want to stir it up again and we may as well leave this space to discuss further issues and to provide a broader context. —AlphaDog
