The Empire Nation

InfoInfo
Search:    
# Date Editor Comment Action
125 2008-09-28 17:34:19 JasonAller link fixes  view raw print
124 2008-09-27 00:17:05 JasonAller link fixes  view raw print
123 2008-09-26 19:13:35 JabberWokky unlocking  view raw print
122 2007-08-28 17:45:23 PhilipNeustrom    view raw print
121 2007-08-28 17:42:15 WilliamLewis Revert to version 116 (Nobody came out in favor of the other version.).  view raw print
120 2007-08-28 17:40:25 SteveOstrowski    view raw print
119 2007-08-28 17:39:48 SteveOstrowski Unnecessary speculation  view raw print
118 2007-08-27 23:35:21 JabberWokky    view raw print
117 2007-08-27 23:34:54 SteveOstrowski Revert to version 115.  view raw print
116 2007-08-27 23:34:22 WilliamLewis Revert to version 114.  view raw print
115 2007-08-27 23:33:07 SteveOstrowski Revert to version 113.  view raw print
114 2007-08-27 23:32:52 WilliamLewis Revert to version 111 (Sorry, that version sucks. :().  view raw print
113 2007-08-27 23:31:53 JabberWokky Revert to version 110 (Trying a compromise edit between the sides before I lock the entry.).  view raw print
112 2007-08-27 23:31:25 SteveOstrowski Revert to version 110.  view raw print
111 2007-08-27 23:30:55 BradBenedict Revert to version 108 (Hey this is fun).  view raw print
110 2007-08-27 23:30:49 JabberWokky If Philip hasn't fixed the bug, this is going to be an amusing edit.  view raw print
109 2007-08-27 23:30:31 SteveOstrowski Revert to version 106.  view raw print
108 2007-08-27 23:30:12 BradBenedict Revert to version 105 (Penis).  view raw print
107 2007-08-27 23:30:00 WilliamLewis Revert to version 105 (you called me a partisan. you brought up asucd. now stop, this isn't yours.).  view raw print
106 2007-08-27 23:29:25 SteveOstrowski Revert to version 104 (Radio show has nothing to do with ASUCD).  view raw print
105 2007-08-27 23:27:07 WilliamLewis Revert to version 103 (Partisan? I don't support GO/STUFO nor LEAD. ASUCD sucks, IMO.).  view raw print
104 2007-08-27 23:22:00 SteveOstrowski Revert to version 102 (partisan attacks on a show should not be put on ).  view raw print
103 2007-08-27 23:00:20 WilliamLewis Revert to version 101 (more detailed version with errors corrected.).  view raw print
102 2007-08-27 22:59:05 SteveOstrowski Revert to version 100.  view raw print
101 2007-08-27 22:05:40 WilliamLewis Revert to version 99 (*sigh*).  view raw print
100 2007-08-27 22:00:38 SteveOstrowski Revert to version 98.  view raw print
99 2007-08-27 20:57:39 WilliamLewis Revert to version 97 (You would.).  view raw print
98 2007-08-27 20:43:57 SteveOstrowski Revert to version 95 (I disagree with these "details" ).  view raw print
97 2007-08-27 20:11:55 WilliamLewis put back stuff that was removed, correct phone number, rm double space, format  view raw print
96 2007-08-27 18:00:13 JamesSchwab Revert to version 94 (We dont let businesses have full control over their page, an neither can you.).  view raw print
95 2007-08-27 16:45:17 SteveOstrowski Revert to version 90.  view raw print
94 2007-08-27 16:24:33 EdWins sorry karl, didnt get an edit conflict (same time). redo if you want.  view raw print
93 2007-08-27 16:20:11 EdWins lists suck. whats the number to call in?  view raw print
92 2007-08-27 16:14:20 KarlMogel Integrated best parts of two sides of edit war.  view raw print
91 2007-08-27 16:05:57 KarlMogel Revert to version 89 (deleting true information makes me a sad panda).  view raw print
90 2007-08-27 14:05:33 SteveOstrowski Revert to version 88.  view raw print
89 2007-08-27 13:42:30 JamesSchwab Revert to version 83.  view raw print
88 2007-08-27 13:32:47 SteveOstrowski Revert to version 86.  view raw print
87 2007-08-27 09:47:07 WilliamLewis Revert to version 85 (This is how the page would look if it weren't written by Steve and his minions.).  view raw print
86 2007-08-27 09:46:07 JoseBleckman Revert to version 84 (Adding opinions = good, making the whole page negative = bad).  view raw print
85 2007-08-27 09:28:06 JamesSchwab Revert to version 83 (Then edit and add your opinion).  view raw print
84 2007-08-27 09:25:25 JoseBleckman Revert to version 76 (Last few edits seem to have been made to attack him. Uncool.).  view raw print
83 2007-08-27 08:39:53 WilliamLewis    view raw print
82 2007-08-27 08:37:14 WilliamLewis    view raw print
81 2007-08-27 08:36:36 WilliamLewis    view raw print
80 2007-08-27 08:35:40 WilliamLewis    view raw print
79 2007-08-27 08:33:15 WilliamLewis (quick edit)  view raw print
78 2007-08-27 08:32:08 WilliamLewis    view raw print
77 2007-08-27 08:29:58 WilliamLewis    view raw print
76 2007-08-27 05:50:03 SteveOstrowski    view raw print
75 2007-07-24 00:28:32 BrentLaabs you really can't be wrong  view raw print
74 2007-07-19 00:22:27 SteveOstrowski    view raw print
73 2007-07-08 01:54:03 SteveOstrowski    view raw print
72 2007-07-08 01:46:53 ChristopherMckenzie    view raw print
71 2007-07-08 01:45:50 ChristopherMckenzie    view raw print
70 2007-07-07 22:03:12 EdWins Revert to version 68 (random useless insert. the paragraph is fine as is. ).  view raw print
69 2007-07-07 19:45:18 JoseBleckman As much as you might like it to be conservative leaning, it ain't.  view raw print
68 2007-07-07 03:35:54 SteveOstrowski    view raw print
67 2007-07-06 19:58:16 SteveOstrowski    view raw print
66 2007-07-06 19:56:07 JasonAller Comment added.  view raw print
65 2007-07-06 19:46:18 SteveOstrowski    view raw print
64 2007-07-06 07:19:32 JabberWokky    view raw print
63 2007-07-05 17:31:54 BrentLaabs armed conflict  view raw print
62 2007-07-05 16:36:56 WilliamLewis He's faking it.  view raw print
61 2007-07-05 16:35:36 JamesSchwab    view raw print
60 2007-07-05 16:28:25 JoseBleckman Pointing out content, rather than assumptions.  view raw print
59 2007-07-05 16:11:13 JamesSchwab Comment added.  view raw print
58 2007-07-05 15:25:06 JabberWokky (quick edit)  view raw print
57 2007-07-05 15:22:19 JabberWokky +info, formatting  view raw print
56 2007-07-05 15:14:48 JabberWokky Comment added.  view raw print
55 2007-07-03 23:50:48 ChristopherMckenzie    view raw print
54 2007-07-03 23:40:24 BrentLaabs    view raw print
53 2007-07-03 23:37:11 ChristopherMckenzie    view raw print
52 2007-07-02 16:10:44 WilliamLewis replaced clobbered comment  view raw print
51 2007-07-02 16:10:05 WilliamLewis Revert to version 48 (completely factual as is. why do you want to change it?).  view raw print
50 2007-07-02 15:51:25 JamesSchwab    view raw print
49 2007-07-02 15:40:46 JoseBleckman Another try at a compromise.  view raw print
48 2007-07-02 14:16:10 GregWebb    view raw print
47 2007-07-02 13:45:39 WilliamLewis Comment added.  view raw print
46 2007-07-02 13:35:53 ChristopherMckenzie    view raw print
45 2007-07-02 09:24:44 JamesSchwab Comment added.  view raw print
44 2007-07-02 09:19:23 EdWins QQ more.  view raw print
43 2007-07-02 08:38:56 GregWebb Comment added.  view raw print
42 2007-07-02 06:41:28 KarlMogel Comment added.  view raw print
41 2007-07-02 06:20:35 JoseBleckman    view raw print
40 2007-07-02 03:16:11 SteveOstrowski    view raw print
39 2007-07-02 02:25:12 ChristopherMckenzie ah sorry, one more  view raw print
38 2007-07-02 02:18:36 ChristopherMckenzie The great SO..  view raw print
37 2007-07-02 01:22:14 SteveOstrowski    view raw print
36 2007-07-02 01:12:47 EdWins hm?  view raw print
35 2007-07-01 23:06:52 SteveOstrowski    view raw print
34 2007-07-01 22:48:51 EdWins fixing the runaway italics  view raw print
33 2007-07-01 22:46:53 EdWins Comment added.  view raw print
32 2007-07-01 18:15:30 EdWins Revert to version 30 (It is according to SO. "according to content"- maybe in a month or 2of content).  view raw print
31 2007-07-01 18:10:59 JoseBleckman Hardly.  view raw print
30 2007-07-01 15:34:02 WilliamLewis Revert to version 28 (this is correct. first show was an attempted caricature.).  view raw print
29 2007-07-01 14:56:38 JoseBleckman Keeping it to the first show, keeps it to what we have evidence for.  view raw print
28 2007-07-01 14:41:05 EdWins need more than a couple to talk about content really.  view raw print
27 2007-07-01 14:01:02 SteveOstrowski Comment added.  view raw print
26 2007-07-01 14:00:39 JoseBleckman    view raw print
This is a Wiki Spot wiki. Wiki Spot is a 501(c)3 non-profit organization that helps communities collaborate via wikis.