This account is using an obvious pseudonym and seems to be devoted to
causing trouble. I propose this account be banned. —WilliamLewis
Comments:
Note: You must be logged in to add comments
2012-02-06 12:40:00 I agree that this account seems to just be a troll. David Martin
notes that Elizabeth Quesada doesn't even know who's pulling these shenanigans, ostensibly on her behalf. Wasn't there another trollish account a few months back basically railing about the same thing - other editors altering "copy" they hadn't written? —TomGarberson
-
Ahhh... I didn't know that point (that Elizabeth didn't know him). And that changes my view quite a bit. -jw
2012-02-06 13:18:53 If just a troll, why the obsession with Elizabeth Quesada? I'm not saying "no ban," just trying to figure out what is going on. There is so much to troll about that I'm not sure why this one page is being focused on. —CovertProfessor
2012-02-06 14:49:00 I vote ban based on what I've seen today. —PeterBoulay
2012-02-06 14:55:40 If he has a legitimate beef about the page, he's more than welcome to address it. He's used his user page in the past, and there's the [[stop]] macro with a link to the Talk page. If he continues to make a mess while being obnoxious about it, I'll support a ban. For the time being, I'd say we haven't hit ban stage yet. There's still a reasonable chance that he's actually trying to accomplish something legitimate (by which I mean non-trolly) and just doesn't fully understand (or agree with) the relevant issues. —TomGarberson


