Recent Changes for "Users/DavispublicServant" - Davis Wikihttp://daviswiki.org/Users/DavispublicServantRecent Changes of the page "Users/DavispublicServant" on Davis Wiki.en-us Users/DavispublicServanthttp://daviswiki.org/Users/DavispublicServant2008-07-06 12:25:56JasonAllerUsers/ing links <div id="content" class="wikipage content"> Differences for Users/DavispublicServant<p><strong></strong></p><table> <tr> <td> <span> Deletions are marked with - . </span> </td> <td> <span> Additions are marked with +. </span> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> Line 5: </td> <td> Line 5: </td> </tr> <tr> <td> <span>-</span> Welcome to the wiki, whoever you are. - ["SharlaDaly"] </td> <td> <span>+</span> Welcome to the wiki, whoever you are. - ["<span>Users/</span>SharlaDaly"] </td> </tr> <tr> <td> Line 7: </td> <td> Line 7: </td> </tr> <tr> <td> <span>-</span> Is there a particular reason why you can't identify yourself? - ["KenjiYamada"] </td> <td> <span>+</span> Is there a particular reason why you can't identify yourself? - ["<span>Users/</span>KenjiYamada"] </td> </tr> <tr> <td> Line 9: </td> <td> Line 9: </td> </tr> <tr> <td> <span>-</span> Let's just say I prefer to remain anonymous at this time. -- ["DavispublicServant"] </td> <td> <span>+</span> Let's just say I prefer to remain anonymous at this time. -- ["<span>Users/</span>DavispublicServant"] </td> </tr> <tr> <td> Line 11: </td> <td> Line 11: </td> </tr> <tr> <td> <span>-</span> Remaining anonymous is your choice. Perhaps at a later time you will be able to ["Importance of using your RealName" use your real name]. -- ["JasonAller"] </td> <td> <span>+</span> Remaining anonymous is your choice. Perhaps at a later time you will be able to ["Importance of using your RealName" use your real name]. -- ["<span>Users/</span>JasonAller"] </td> </tr> <tr> <td> Line 13: </td> <td> Line 13: </td> </tr> <tr> <td> <span>-</span> ''2006-04-29 19:58:41'' [[nbsp]] Did you want to delete the entire page rather than just the contents of ["Halema Buzayan/Yolo County DA's Office"]? --["JasonAller"] </td> <td> <span>+</span> ''2006-04-29 19:58:41'' [[nbsp]] Did you want to delete the entire page rather than just the contents of ["Halema Buzayan/Yolo County DA's Office"]? --["<span>Users/</span>JasonAller"] </td> </tr> <tr> <td> Line 15: </td> <td> Line 15: </td> </tr> <tr> <td> <span>-</span> ''2006-04-29 21:19:34'' [[nbsp]] DavispublicServant, concerning the information that was posted concering Halema, if you can't provide a cite to a public document, I suggest you either rephase it as your opinion or delete it. --["GrumpyoldGeek"] </td> <td> <span>+</span> ''2006-04-29 21:19:34'' [[nbsp]] DavispublicServant, concerning the information that was posted concering Halema, if you can't provide a cite to a public document, I suggest you either rephase it as your opinion or delete it. --["<span>Users/</span>GrumpyoldGeek"] </td> </tr> </table> </div> Users/DavispublicServanthttp://daviswiki.org/Users/DavispublicServant2006-05-09 11:33:14SharlaDalyMoving discussion about confidentiality to Halema page <div id="content" class="wikipage content"> Differences for Users/DavispublicServant<p><strong></strong></p><table> <tr> <td> <span> Deletions are marked with - . </span> </td> <td> <span> Additions are marked with +. </span> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> Line 13: </td> <td> Line 13: </td> </tr> <tr> <td> <span>- ''2006-04-29 01:47:26'' [[nbsp]] I read the information you posted on the Halema page and also listened to the police tapes on the Davis Enterprise. I understood that Judge Warriner had ordered that the adults involved in Halema's case were to follow the law regarding juvenile confidentiality. Can the Yolo County DA's office decide on its own that these laws no longer apply to a particular juvenile? What's to keep this from happening to other kids in Davis? --["SharlaDaly"]<br> - ------<br> - ''2006-04-29 01:49:08'' [[nbsp]] Maybe we should now remove the Halema page or at least edit out all reference to her identity. --["SharlaDaly"]<br> - ------<br> - ''2006-04-29 08:31:50'' [[nbsp]] I believe that Halema and her family waived their right to confidentiality. --["WilliamLewis"]<br> - ------<br> - ''2006-04-29 08:55:41'' [[nbsp]] I don't believe a parent can waive that right for their child and the Court ordered that the Defense and the DAs office were to follow the confidentiallity laws. Juvenile files are not to be even acknowledged. This does not bode well for juveniles in Yolo County. I think that they should rotate out the DAs assigned to juvenile cases and reassign them to adult criminal cases where confidentially is not something that needs to be grasped. --["SharlaDaly"]<br> - ------<br> - ''2006-04-29 15:43:13'' [[nbsp]] I'd imagine that parents, since they legally represent their children, and that children have no legal rights (short of against abuse and other direct criminal acts) against their parents unless "emancipated" (that is to say, given their own legal identity), are wholly qualified to waive confidentiality rights on behalf of their children. Furthermore, if the parents weren't of the same party (ie representing their children fully), THEY would not have access to the confidential files either. Suffice to say, I would say unless someone cites something authoritative that says otherwise it is not safe to fiat "I don't believe a parent can waive that right." --["KrisFricke"]<br> - ------<br> - ''2006-04-29 18:43:37'' [[nbsp]] Even if the parents give their permission for the release of information, Juvenile Court has to approve it. There is a process. See [http://www.leginfo.ca.gov/cgi-bin/waisgate?WAISdocID=3607458072+0+0+0&amp;WAISaction=retrieve California Code - Welfare and Institutions Code Section 825-830.1] Releasing confidential juvenile information to others not on a very specific list and for very specific purposes is a misdeameanor. From what I read in the paper, the DDA made a request to be allowed to release information about the case and it was denied by Judge Warriner. The order was for everyone to follow juvenile confidentiality laws. Information that the DDA released is extremely confidential and, it is assumed, damaging to the child, including the juvenile's birth date, where she goes to school, her drivers license number, description, names and birth dates of her 3 siblings. Why the DDA did this, I can't fathom. Essentially, she is asking the community to become a huge "police oversight" body. Or, maybe the DDA just disagrees with the Judge's adjudication and hopes that this will result in something that approximates her sense of justice in this matter. That is something to think about --["SharlaDaly"]<br> - I can't access the link provided but this is one of the dumbest things I've ever heard! So parents can't release confidential information about a child but somehow if the government asks a public school for possible military candidates the school must release such information?<br> - * I am not referring to the parents or the juvenile releasing information. The District Attorney did. The child and her parents can do anything they want, but the Officers of the Court cannot. What is so dumb about that? Here's the website to find the code: http://www.leginfo.ca.gov/calaw.html. Search for "Juvenile confidential" under Welfare and Institutions Code. Look for Section 825-830.1 - ["SharlaDaly"]<br> - * Oh, wow. My bad. I completely agree with you on that. I must have read it wrong or something... sorry. --["TusharRawat"]<br> - * Hey I just read sections 825-830.1 and I didn't see anything that answers the specific question at hand -- could you provide a more specific citation? Also, as per your restatement above "''I am not referring ... The District Attorney did.''" I think that mischaracterizes the subject at hand, as the subject is the parents or juvenile authorizing the DA to release information, which essentially is in fact essentially equal to ''the parents or the juvenile releasing information''. -["KrisFricke"]<br> - * See section 827.9. It is not clear that the DDA petitioned the Court to release confidential juvenile police records to the Davis Enterprise and received authorization from the Court after an objection period prior to doing so. The DA/Halema page says "Yolo County District Attorney’s Office has determined that...the office can now talk about the facts of the case with the public." I don't think that the DA's Office has the power to go against a Court Order to follow juvenile confidentiality laws, regardless of whether they anticipate an objection from the parents or not. I am not trying to divert attention from the issue of whether Officer Ly acted in good faith or not. As a parent, I am just alarmed that the DDA can release very personal information about a juvenile without permission from the Court. This is really important. I don't think the DDA has followed the law here. If they release the information to the juvenile and she released it to the press, that would be different, much as I find that equally alarming. -["SharlaDaly"] <br> - ------</span> </td> <td> </td> </tr> </table> </div> Users/DavispublicServanthttp://daviswiki.org/Users/DavispublicServant2006-04-30 17:51:47SharlaDaly <div id="content" class="wikipage content"> Differences for Users/DavispublicServant<p><strong></strong></p><table> <tr> <td> <span> Deletions are marked with - . </span> </td> <td> <span> Additions are marked with +. </span> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> Line 28: </td> <td> Line 28: </td> </tr> <tr> <td> <span>-</span> * See section 827.9. It is not clear that the DDA petitioned the Court to release confidential juvenile police records to the Davis Enterprise and received authorization from the Court after an objection period prior to doing so. The DA/Halema page says "Yolo County District Attorney’s Office has determined that...the office can now talk about the facts of the case with the public." I don't think that the DA's Office has the power to go against a Court Order to follow juvenile confidentiality laws, regardless of whether they anticipate an objection from the parents or not. I am not trying to divert attention from the issue of whether Officer Ly acted in good faith or not. As a parent, I am just alarmed that the DDA can release very personal information about a juvenile without permission from the Court. This is really important. I don't think the DDA has followed the law here. If they release the information to the juvenile and she released it to the press, that would be different, much as I find that equally alarming. -<span>{</span>"SharlaDaly"] </td> <td> <span>+</span> * See section 827.9. It is not clear that the DDA petitioned the Court to release confidential juvenile police records to the Davis Enterprise and received authorization from the Court after an objection period prior to doing so. The DA/Halema page says "Yolo County District Attorney’s Office has determined that...the office can now talk about the facts of the case with the public." I don't think that the DA's Office has the power to go against a Court Order to follow juvenile confidentiality laws, regardless of whether they anticipate an objection from the parents or not. I am not trying to divert attention from the issue of whether Officer Ly acted in good faith or not. As a parent, I am just alarmed that the DDA can release very personal information about a juvenile without permission from the Court. This is really important. I don't think the DDA has followed the law here. If they release the information to the juvenile and she released it to the press, that would be different, much as I find that equally alarming. -<span>[</span>"SharlaDaly"] </td> </tr> </table> </div> Users/DavispublicServanthttp://daviswiki.org/Users/DavispublicServant2006-04-30 17:50:06SharlaDaly <div id="content" class="wikipage content"> Differences for Users/DavispublicServant<p><strong></strong></p><table> <tr> <td> <span> Deletions are marked with - . </span> </td> <td> <span> Additions are marked with +. </span> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> Line 28: </td> <td> Line 28: </td> </tr> <tr> <td> <span>-</span> * See section 827.9. It is not clear that the DDA petitioned the Court to release confidential juvenile police records to the Davis Enterprise and received authorization from the Court after an objection period. The DA/Halema page says "Yolo County District Attorney’s Office has determined that...the office can now talk about the facts of the case with the public." I don't think that the DA's Office has the power to go against a Court Order to follow juvenile confidentiality laws<span>. </span> </td> <td> <span>+</span> * See section 827.9. It is not clear that the DDA petitioned the Court to release confidential juvenile police records to the Davis Enterprise and received authorization from the Court after an objection period<span>&nbsp;prior to doing so</span>. The DA/Halema page says "Yolo County District Attorney’s Office has determined that...the office can now talk about the facts of the case with the public." I don't think that the DA's Office has the power to go against a Court Order to follow juvenile confidentiality laws<span>, regardless of whether they anticipate an objection from the parents or not. I am not trying to divert attention from the issue of whether Officer Ly acted in good faith or not. As a parent, I am just alarmed that the DDA can release very personal information about a juvenile without permission from the Court. This is really important. I don't think the DDA has followed the law here. If they release the information to the juvenile and she released it to the press, that would be different, much as I find that equally alarming. -{"SharlaDaly"] </span> </td> </tr> </table> </div> Users/DavispublicServanthttp://daviswiki.org/Users/DavispublicServant2006-04-30 17:41:22SharlaDaly <div id="content" class="wikipage content"> Differences for Users/DavispublicServant<p><strong></strong></p><table> <tr> <td> <span> Deletions are marked with - . </span> </td> <td> <span> Additions are marked with +. </span> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> Line 28: </td> <td> Line 28: </td> </tr> <tr> <td> </td> <td> <span>+ * See section 827.9. It is not clear that the DDA petitioned the Court to release confidential juvenile police records to the Davis Enterprise and received authorization from the Court after an objection period. The DA/Halema page says "Yolo County District Attorney’s Office has determined that...the office can now talk about the facts of the case with the public." I don't think that the DA's Office has the power to go against a Court Order to follow juvenile confidentiality laws. </span> </td> </tr> </table> </div> Users/DavispublicServanthttp://daviswiki.org/Users/DavispublicServant2006-04-30 13:00:56KrisFrickenarrowing in on the legal question <div id="content" class="wikipage content"> Differences for Users/DavispublicServant<p><strong></strong></p><table> <tr> <td> <span> Deletions are marked with - . </span> </td> <td> <span> Additions are marked with +. </span> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> Line 27: </td> <td> Line 27: </td> </tr> <tr> <td> </td> <td> <span>+ * Hey I just read sections 825-830.1 and I didn't see anything that answers the specific question at hand -- could you provide a more specific citation? Also, as per your restatement above "''I am not referring ... The District Attorney did.''" I think that mischaracterizes the subject at hand, as the subject is the parents or juvenile authorizing the DA to release information, which essentially is in fact essentially equal to ''the parents or the juvenile releasing information''. -["KrisFricke"]</span> </td> </tr> </table> </div> Users/DavispublicServanthttp://daviswiki.org/Users/DavispublicServant2006-04-29 21:40:29TusharRawatmy bad, sorry <div id="content" class="wikipage content"> Differences for Users/DavispublicServant<p><strong></strong></p><table> <tr> <td> <span> Deletions are marked with - . </span> </td> <td> <span> Additions are marked with +. </span> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> Line 26: </td> <td> Line 26: </td> </tr> <tr> <td> </td> <td> <span>+ * Oh, wow. My bad. I completely agree with you on that. I must have read it wrong or something... sorry. --["TusharRawat"]</span> </td> </tr> </table> </div> Users/DavispublicServanthttp://daviswiki.org/Users/DavispublicServant2006-04-29 21:19:34GrumpyoldGeekComment added. <div id="content" class="wikipage content"> Differences for Users/DavispublicServant<p><strong></strong></p><table> <tr> <td> <span> Deletions are marked with - . </span> </td> <td> <span> Additions are marked with +. </span> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> Line 28: </td> <td> Line 28: </td> </tr> <tr> <td> </td> <td> <span>+ ------<br> + ''2006-04-29 21:19:34'' [[nbsp]] DavispublicServant, concerning the information that was posted concering Halema, if you can't provide a cite to a public document, I suggest you either rephase it as your opinion or delete it. --["GrumpyoldGeek"]</span> </td> </tr> </table> </div> Users/DavispublicServanthttp://daviswiki.org/Users/DavispublicServant2006-04-29 21:05:46SharlaDaly <div id="content" class="wikipage content"> Differences for Users/DavispublicServant<p><strong></strong></p><table> <tr> <td> <span> Deletions are marked with - . </span> </td> <td> <span> Additions are marked with +. </span> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> Line 25: </td> <td> Line 25: </td> </tr> <tr> <td> </td> <td> <span>+ * I am not referring to the parents or the juvenile releasing information. The District Attorney did. The child and her parents can do anything they want, but the Officers of the Court cannot. What is so dumb about that? Here's the website to find the code: http://www.leginfo.ca.gov/calaw.html. Search for "Juvenile confidential" under Welfare and Institutions Code. Look for Section 825-830.1 - ["SharlaDaly"]</span> </td> </tr> </table> </div> Users/DavispublicServanthttp://daviswiki.org/Users/DavispublicServant2006-04-29 19:58:41JasonAllerComment added. <div id="content" class="wikipage content"> Differences for Users/DavispublicServant<p><strong></strong></p><table> <tr> <td> <span> Deletions are marked with - . </span> </td> <td> <span> Additions are marked with +. </span> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> Line 25: </td> <td> Line 25: </td> </tr> <tr> <td> </td> <td> <span>+ ------<br> + ''2006-04-29 19:58:41'' [[nbsp]] Did you want to delete the entire page rather than just the contents of ["Halema Buzayan/Yolo County DA's Office"]? --["JasonAller"]</span> </td> </tr> </table> </div> Users/DavispublicServanthttp://daviswiki.org/Users/DavispublicServant2006-04-29 19:42:39TusharRawatwth????? <div id="content" class="wikipage content"> Differences for Users/DavispublicServant<p><strong></strong></p><table> <tr> <td> <span> Deletions are marked with - . </span> </td> <td> <span> Additions are marked with +. </span> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> Line 24: </td> <td> Line 24: </td> </tr> <tr> <td> </td> <td> <span>+ I can't access the link provided but this is one of the dumbest things I've ever heard! So parents can't release confidential information about a child but somehow if the government asks a public school for possible military candidates the school must release such information?</span> </td> </tr> </table> </div> Users/DavispublicServanthttp://daviswiki.org/Users/DavispublicServant2006-04-29 19:01:32SharlaDalyThis discussion should be moved, but I don't know where. <div id="content" class="wikipage content"> Differences for Users/DavispublicServant<p><strong></strong></p><table> <tr> <td> <span> Deletions are marked with - . </span> </td> <td> <span> Additions are marked with +. </span> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> Line 23: </td> <td> Line 23: </td> </tr> <tr> <td> <span>- ''2006-04-29 18:43:37'' [[nbsp]] Even if the parents give their permission for the release of information, Juvenile Court has to approve it. There is a process. See California Code - Welfare and Institutions Code Section 825-830.1 To release confidential juvenile information is a Misdeameanor. --["SharlaDaly"]</span> </td> <td> <span>+ ''2006-04-29 18:43:37'' [[nbsp]] Even if the parents give their permission for the release of information, Juvenile Court has to approve it. There is a process. See [http://www.leginfo.ca.gov/cgi-bin/waisgate?WAISdocID=3607458072+0+0+0&amp;WAISaction=retrieve California Code - Welfare and Institutions Code Section 825-830.1] Releasing confidential juvenile information to others not on a very specific list and for very specific purposes is a misdeameanor. From what I read in the paper, the DDA made a request to be allowed to release information about the case and it was denied by Judge Warriner. The order was for everyone to follow juvenile confidentiality laws. Information that the DDA released is extremely confidential and, it is assumed, damaging to the child, including the juvenile's birth date, where she goes to school, her drivers license number, description, names and birth dates of her 3 siblings. Why the DDA did this, I can't fathom. Essentially, she is asking the community to become a huge "police oversight" body. Or, maybe the DDA just disagrees with the Judge's adjudication and hopes that this will result in something that approximates her sense of justice in this matter. That is something to think about --["SharlaDaly"]</span> </td> </tr> </table> </div> Users/DavispublicServanthttp://daviswiki.org/Users/DavispublicServant2006-04-29 18:43:37SharlaDalyComment added. <div id="content" class="wikipage content"> Differences for Users/DavispublicServant<p><strong></strong></p><table> <tr> <td> <span> Deletions are marked with - . </span> </td> <td> <span> Additions are marked with +. </span> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> Line 22: </td> <td> Line 22: </td> </tr> <tr> <td> </td> <td> <span>+ ------<br> + ''2006-04-29 18:43:37'' [[nbsp]] Even if the parents give their permission for the release of information, Juvenile Court has to approve it. There is a process. See California Code - Welfare and Institutions Code Section 825-830.1 To release confidential juvenile information is a Misdeameanor. --["SharlaDaly"]</span> </td> </tr> </table> </div> Users/DavispublicServanthttp://daviswiki.org/Users/DavispublicServant2006-04-29 15:43:13KrisFrickeComment added. <div id="content" class="wikipage content"> Differences for Users/DavispublicServant<p><strong></strong></p><table> <tr> <td> <span> Deletions are marked with - . </span> </td> <td> <span> Additions are marked with +. </span> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> Line 20: </td> <td> Line 20: </td> </tr> <tr> <td> </td> <td> <span>+ ------<br> + ''2006-04-29 15:43:13'' [[nbsp]] I'd imagine that parents, since they legally represent their children, and that children have no legal rights (short of against abuse and other direct criminal acts) against their parents unless "emancipated" (that is to say, given their own legal identity), are wholly qualified to waive confidentiality rights on behalf of their children. Furthermore, if the parents weren't of the same party (ie representing their children fully), THEY would not have access to the confidential files either. Suffice to say, I would say unless someone cites something authoritative that says otherwise it is not safe to fiat "I don't believe a parent can waive that right." --["KrisFricke"]</span> </td> </tr> </table> </div> Users/DavispublicServanthttp://daviswiki.org/Users/DavispublicServant2006-04-29 08:55:41SharlaDalyComment added. <div id="content" class="wikipage content"> Differences for Users/DavispublicServant<p><strong></strong></p><table> <tr> <td> <span> Deletions are marked with - . </span> </td> <td> <span> Additions are marked with +. </span> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> Line 18: </td> <td> Line 18: </td> </tr> <tr> <td> </td> <td> <span>+ ------<br> + ''2006-04-29 08:55:41'' [[nbsp]] I don't believe a parent can waive that right for their child and the Court ordered that the Defense and the DAs office were to follow the confidentiallity laws. Juvenile files are not to be even acknowledged. This does not bode well for juveniles in Yolo County. I think that they should rotate out the DAs assigned to juvenile cases and reassign them to adult criminal cases where confidentially is not something that needs to be grasped. --["SharlaDaly"]</span> </td> </tr> </table> </div> Users/DavispublicServanthttp://daviswiki.org/Users/DavispublicServant2006-04-29 08:31:50WilliamLewisComment added. <div id="content" class="wikipage content"> Differences for Users/DavispublicServant<p><strong></strong></p><table> <tr> <td> <span> Deletions are marked with - . </span> </td> <td> <span> Additions are marked with +. </span> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> Line 16: </td> <td> Line 16: </td> </tr> <tr> <td> </td> <td> <span>+ ------<br> + ''2006-04-29 08:31:50'' [[nbsp]] I believe that Halema and her family waived their right to confidentiality. --["WilliamLewis"]</span> </td> </tr> </table> </div> Users/DavispublicServanthttp://daviswiki.org/Users/DavispublicServant2006-04-29 01:49:08SharlaDalyComment added. <div id="content" class="wikipage content"> Differences for Users/DavispublicServant<p><strong></strong></p><table> <tr> <td> <span> Deletions are marked with - . </span> </td> <td> <span> Additions are marked with +. </span> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> Line 14: </td> <td> Line 14: </td> </tr> <tr> <td> </td> <td> <span>+ ------<br> + ''2006-04-29 01:49:08'' [[nbsp]] Maybe we should now remove the Halema page or at least edit out all reference to her identity. --["SharlaDaly"]</span> </td> </tr> </table> </div> Users/DavispublicServanthttp://daviswiki.org/Users/DavispublicServant2006-04-29 01:47:26SharlaDalyComment added. <div id="content" class="wikipage content"> Differences for Users/DavispublicServant<p><strong></strong></p><table> <tr> <td> <span> Deletions are marked with - . </span> </td> <td> <span> Additions are marked with +. </span> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> Line 12: </td> <td> Line 12: </td> </tr> <tr> <td> </td> <td> <span>+ ------<br> + ''2006-04-29 01:47:26'' [[nbsp]] I read the information you posted on the Halema page and also listened to the police tapes on the Davis Enterprise. I understood that Judge Warriner had ordered that the adults involved in Halema's case were to follow the law regarding juvenile confidentiality. Can the Yolo County DA's office decide on its own that these laws no longer apply to a particular juvenile? What's to keep this from happening to other kids in Davis? --["SharlaDaly"]</span> </td> </tr> </table> </div> Users/DavispublicServanthttp://daviswiki.org/Users/DavispublicServant2006-04-28 20:41:52JasonAller <div id="content" class="wikipage content"> Differences for Users/DavispublicServant<p><strong></strong></p><table> <tr> <td> <span> Deletions are marked with - . </span> </td> <td> <span> Additions are marked with +. </span> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> Line 3: </td> <td> Line 3: </td> </tr> <tr> <td> </td> <td> <span>+ [[Comments]]</span> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> Line 8: </td> <td> Line 9: </td> </tr> <tr> <td> <span>- Let's just say I prefer to remain anonymous at this time.</span> </td> <td> <span>+ Let's just say I prefer to remain anonymous at this time. -- ["DavispublicServant"]<br> + <br> + Remaining anonymous is your choice. Perhaps at a later time you will be able to ["Importance of using your RealName" use your real name]. -- ["JasonAller"]</span> </td> </tr> </table> </div> Users/DavispublicServanthttp://daviswiki.org/Users/DavispublicServant2006-04-28 20:35:14DavispublicServant <div id="content" class="wikipage content"> Differences for Users/DavispublicServant<p><strong></strong></p><table> <tr> <td> <span> Deletions are marked with - . </span> </td> <td> <span> Additions are marked with +. </span> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> Line 7: </td> <td> Line 7: </td> </tr> <tr> <td> </td> <td> <span>+ <br> + Let's just say I prefer to remain anonymous at this time.</span> </td> </tr> </table> </div> Users/DavispublicServanthttp://daviswiki.org/Users/DavispublicServant2006-04-28 17:08:51KenjiYamadawhy anonymous? <div id="content" class="wikipage content"> Differences for Users/DavispublicServant<p><strong></strong></p><table> <tr> <td> <span> Deletions are marked with - . </span> </td> <td> <span> Additions are marked with +. </span> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> Line 5: </td> <td> Line 5: </td> </tr> <tr> <td> </td> <td> <span>+ <br> + Is there a particular reason why you can't identify yourself? - ["KenjiYamada"]</span> </td> </tr> </table> </div> Users/DavispublicServanthttp://daviswiki.org/Users/DavispublicServant2006-04-28 17:01:04SharlaDalyWelcome to the wiki <div id="content" class="wikipage content"> Differences for Users/DavispublicServant<p><strong></strong></p><table> <tr> <td> <span> Deletions are marked with - . </span> </td> <td> <span> Additions are marked with +. </span> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> Line 2: </td> <td> Line 2: </td> </tr> <tr> <td> </td> <td> <span>+ <br> + <br> + Welcome to the wiki, whoever you are. - ["SharlaDaly"]</span> </td> </tr> </table> </div> Users/DavispublicServanthttp://daviswiki.org/Users/DavispublicServant2006-04-28 11:31:03DavispublicServant <div id="content" class="wikipage content"> Differences for Users/DavispublicServant<p><strong></strong></p><table> <tr> <td> <span> Deletions are marked with - . </span> </td> <td> <span> Additions are marked with +. </span> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> Line 1: </td> <td> Line 1: </td> </tr> <tr> <td> </td> <td> <span>+ Just a humble public servant.</span> </td> </tr> </table> </div>