Recent Changes for "Users/GabeKoulikov" - Davis Wiki

Users/GabeKoulikov

JabberWokky — 2009-11-06 04:47:10

Revert to version 62 (Spam. Dirty Spam.).

Differences for Users/GabeKoulikov

Deletions are marked with - .	Additions are marked with +.
Line 78:	Line 78:
- ------ - ''2009-11-06 03:54:14'' [[nbsp]] Hello dearest, - - My name is Miss Jessica,I was very happy when i saw your data today in (daviswiki.org). Besides i am eager to know more about you and to establish a contact relationship or friendship with you,If you do not mind i would like to receive an e-mail from you for me to be able to unveil myself to you only, and to let you know more about me.Here is my email contact, - ( jessicateamah@yahoo.com ),Awaiting to read from you soonest. - Thanks and have a nice day. - - ( jessicateamah@yahoo.com ) - - JESSICA. --["Users/contacto"]

Users/GabeKoulikov

contacto — 2009-11-06 03:54:14

Comment added.

Differences for Users/GabeKoulikov

Deletions are marked with - .	Additions are marked with +.
Line 78:	Line 78:
	+ ------ + ''2009-11-06 03:54:14'' [[nbsp]] Hello dearest, + + My name is Miss Jessica,I was very happy when i saw your data today in (daviswiki.org). Besides i am eager to know more about you and to establish a contact relationship or friendship with you,If you do not mind i would like to receive an e-mail from you for me to be able to unveil myself to you only, and to let you know more about me.Here is my email contact, + ( jessicateamah@yahoo.com ),Awaiting to read from you soonest. + Thanks and have a nice day. + + ( jessicateamah@yahoo.com ) + + JESSICA. --["Users/contacto"]

Users/GabeKoulikov

BrentLaabs — 2008-09-06 18:42:52

fix links

Differences for Users/GabeKoulikov

Deletions are marked with - .	Additions are marked with +.
Line 32:	Line 32:
- ''2005-11-15 22:52:18'' [[nbsp]] Hi, Gabe. --["SteveDavison"]	+ ''2005-11-15 22:52:18'' [[nbsp]] Hi, Gabe. --["Users/SteveDavison"]
Line 34:	Line 34:
- ''2006-06-21 22:37:33'' [[nbsp]] What is 'Interdisciplinary Science Activism (ISA)'? I'm intrigued. Congrats on your graduation, BTW. --["KarlMogel"]	+ ''2006-06-21 22:37:33'' [[nbsp]] What is 'Interdisciplinary Science Activism (ISA)'? I'm intrigued. Congrats on your graduation, BTW. --["Users/KarlMogel"]
Line 36:	Line 36:
- ''2006-06-22 00:09:54'' [[nbsp]] Gabe is one of the founders of Students for Life at UCD. He is responsible for the people who brought the disgusting photos equating the holocaust to abortion. --["JamesSchwab"]	+ ''2006-06-22 00:09:54'' [[nbsp]] Gabe is one of the founders of Students for Life at UCD. He is responsible for the people who brought the disgusting photos equating the holocaust to abortion. --["Users/JamesSchwab"]
Line 38:	Line 38:
- ''2006-06-22 09:05:26'' [[nbsp]] Okay, this will probably cause chaos and disruption but I disagree Schwab. Reality is reality and if you don't like the pictures you should work to have it stopped. --["SteveOstrowski"]	+ ''2006-06-22 09:05:26'' [[nbsp]] Okay, this will probably cause chaos and disruption but I disagree Schwab. Reality is reality and if you don't like the pictures you should work to have it stopped. --["Users/SteveOstrowski"]
Line 40:	Line 40:
- ''2006-06-22 14:09:21'' [[nbsp]] I believe in free speech so I would not work try and stop their presentation. I would inform those who saw the pictures that they were not scientifically accurate. Their reality is not reality. --["JamesSchwab"] - * Can you be more specific about what you mean by "not scientifically accurate"? In what way(s) specifically were the pictures inaccurate? --["GabeKoulikov"]	+ ''2006-06-22 14:09:21'' [[nbsp]] I believe in free speech so I would not work try and stop their presentation. I would inform those who saw the pictures that they were not scientifically accurate. Their reality is not reality. --["Users/JamesSchwab"] + * Can you be more specific about what you mean by "not scientifically accurate"? In what way(s) specifically were the pictures inaccurate? --["Users/GabeKoulikov"]
Line 43:	Line 43:
- Anyway, I can't seem to find anything resembling 'Interdisciplinary Science Activism (ISA)' on the net, what is it? -["KarlMogel" KJM] - * The pictures were said to be aborted fetuses, they were not. The pictures were of abandoned babies, still born babies, and a doll's hand next to a quarter. --["JamesSchwab"] - * LOL. -["KarlMogel" KJM] - * Where is your '''evidence''' that this is indeed the case? (Remember who you're talking to) --["GabeKoulikov"]	+ Anyway, I can't seem to find anything resembling 'Interdisciplinary Science Activism (ISA)' on the net, what is it? -["Users/KarlMogel" KJM] + * The pictures were said to be aborted fetuses, they were not. The pictures were of abandoned babies, still born babies, and a doll's hand next to a quarter. --["Users/JamesSchwab"] + * LOL. -["Users/KarlMogel" KJM] + * Where is your '''evidence''' that this is indeed the case? (Remember who you're talking to) --["Users/GabeKoulikov"]
Line 52:	Line 52:
- I'm sure you can find even more and better photos using Google image search, or other more trustworthy science sources. Now compare these to the graphic photos on [http://www.abortionno.org/GAP/gap_signs.html the GAP signs] and see how they match up with the identified development times for yourself (many of the GAP pictures have common objects for you to be able to more easily make a size comparison). Seriously, James, where did you get the idea that these pictures are photoshopped/staged? Please know that I am open to correction. I am always thankful for constructive and insightful discussion. --["GabeKoulikov"]	+ I'm sure you can find even more and better photos using Google image search, or other more trustworthy science sources. Now compare these to the graphic photos on [http://www.abortionno.org/GAP/gap_signs.html the GAP signs] and see how they match up with the identified development times for yourself (many of the GAP pictures have common objects for you to be able to more easily make a size comparison). Seriously, James, where did you get the idea that these pictures are photoshopped/staged? Please know that I am open to correction. I am always thankful for constructive and insightful discussion. --["Users/GabeKoulikov"]
Line 54:	Line 54:
- * "Pretty sloppy"?; I could say the same for your response, especially coming from another science guy. I have no way of verifying what you have asserted. Please provide some form of evidence/link. The 9-10 week tells me nothing other than “9 weeks” and “10 weeks” are arbitrary categories that bump up against each other. Like I said, I’m a skeptic. Please help me do my skeptic thing! (arguing for your points in a clear, concise, straightforward manner helps also) --["GabeKoulikov"] - * Ok, there was no need to provide another link to their pictures for the 9-10 week mistakes, as you provided the link above. I then gave you directions for how to get to the other mistakes: ''if you'll look on the Matthew 28:20 page'', which would get you to [http://www.abortionno.org/Matt/matt_signs.html THIS] page, check out pictures # 4 and 6 - they are the exact same image, yet, are labeled differently. I hope this is simple enough for you to follow, as you suggested, we should remember who we're talking to. :) J/K I'm afraid I don't have time today to investigate the preserved stillborn surmise, but I'll investigate it soon enough and let you know. (working on an essay contest.) -["KarlMogel"]	+ * "Pretty sloppy"?; I could say the same for your response, especially coming from another science guy. I have no way of verifying what you have asserted. Please provide some form of evidence/link. The 9-10 week tells me nothing other than “9 weeks” and “10 weeks” are arbitrary categories that bump up against each other. Like I said, I’m a skeptic. Please help me do my skeptic thing! (arguing for your points in a clear, concise, straightforward manner helps also) --["Users/GabeKoulikov"] + * Ok, there was no need to provide another link to their pictures for the 9-10 week mistakes, as you provided the link above. I then gave you directions for how to get to the other mistakes: ''if you'll look on the Matthew 28:20 page'', which would get you to [http://www.abortionno.org/Matt/matt_signs.html THIS] page, check out pictures # 4 and 6 - they are the exact same image, yet, are labeled differently. I hope this is simple enough for you to follow, as you suggested, we should remember who we're talking to. :) J/K I'm afraid I don't have time today to investigate the preserved stillborn surmise, but I'll investigate it soon enough and let you know. (working on an essay contest.) -["Users/KarlMogel"]
Line 57:	Line 57:
- Gabe, so what's that ISA thing, or are you purposefully ignoring my question? -["KarlMogel" KJM] - * Time + real life = procrastination at answering your question, in case that makes you feel less ignored (I have been paying attention). I'm very sorry, Karl, as I've internalized some bad habits like procrastination; ISA is the main thing I'm into, and I was supposed to have all kinds of stuff posted online over a year ago (!), but I thank you for your persistent interest, as it is apparently anti-procrastinatory. ISA is a way of 'testing' to see if there is anything that can be comprehensively done about all the screwed up stuff in the world. From my investigations, observations, and experiences I do not believe that academics, activists, or even the "average person" (really nobody) are doing things appropriately (allow me to explain when I have some more time), so I am trying to come up with something anyone/everyone can do regardless of their sociocultural/temporal context, level of ability, etc., to "help the most people in the best way that lasts the longest." Someone recently challenged me with "help them do what?" which I have currently developed to "help them have the maximized opportunity to do that which is most consistent with reality." These are left deliberately vague (for lack of a better term) in order that we can have multiple comprehensive, scientifically testable and mentally/emotionally/spiritually "satisfying" and practically applicable models of reality be allowed to duke it out through some appropriate combination of cooperation and competition so we can finally figure out what we're supposed to be doing, whether that's objective, subjective, or something involving both, and not let the process of discovery get in our way of doing something now! (I.e. ISA as the general framework everyone can work in, with these models as their own main project/movement/whatever they end up turning into) That's about all I've been able to develop on my own, and so I need to "go public" ASAP, definitely before the end of the Summer. I'm currently working on my own "comprehensive model for reality," and just have to pull everything together and hope that I have something that most people can wrap their minds around and understand and get involved with. I have a sort of "pilot project" we can directly apply ISA to that I'm calling Annotated English, because I tend to be most interested in '''''very''''' "controversial" things and/or things others don't really seem to be interested in discussing ''and'' relating to everything else ''and'' taking seriously, so I came up with a relatively non-controversial starter: how can we "revise" the English language in a simple way such that we more effectively communicate our intended meaning? I hope you all could follow all that! I'll try to clear things up on post more in a few days, or a week. Until then, Karl, or anyone else who's interested PLEASE e-mail me (address is near top of page), especially if you come from a "different" perspective then me (which I've found is pretty much everyone :-), since I apparently could use the help in not procrastinating. I hope that didn't read like an infomercial. Any thoughts? I am ''very'' interested in feedback. --["GabeKoulikov"] - * Hey no problem, I figured it was a combination of terms you came up with, be sure to post your thoughts when you can collect them together - but don't expect everything to fit together neatly over a summer! The english language could definitely use some improvements. -["KarlMogel"]	+ Gabe, so what's that ISA thing, or are you purposefully ignoring my question? -["Users/KarlMogel" KJM] + * Time + real life = procrastination at answering your question, in case that makes you feel less ignored (I have been paying attention). I'm very sorry, Karl, as I've internalized some bad habits like procrastination; ISA is the main thing I'm into, and I was supposed to have all kinds of stuff posted online over a year ago (!), but I thank you for your persistent interest, as it is apparently anti-procrastinatory. ISA is a way of 'testing' to see if there is anything that can be comprehensively done about all the screwed up stuff in the world. From my investigations, observations, and experiences I do not believe that academics, activists, or even the "average person" (really nobody) are doing things appropriately (allow me to explain when I have some more time), so I am trying to come up with something anyone/everyone can do regardless of their sociocultural/temporal context, level of ability, etc., to "help the most people in the best way that lasts the longest." Someone recently challenged me with "help them do what?" which I have currently developed to "help them have the maximized opportunity to do that which is most consistent with reality." These are left deliberately vague (for lack of a better term) in order that we can have multiple comprehensive, scientifically testable and mentally/emotionally/spiritually "satisfying" and practically applicable models of reality be allowed to duke it out through some appropriate combination of cooperation and competition so we can finally figure out what we're supposed to be doing, whether that's objective, subjective, or something involving both, and not let the process of discovery get in our way of doing something now! (I.e. ISA as the general framework everyone can work in, with these models as their own main project/movement/whatever they end up turning into) That's about all I've been able to develop on my own, and so I need to "go public" ASAP, definitely before the end of the Summer. I'm currently working on my own "comprehensive model for reality," and just have to pull everything together and hope that I have something that most people can wrap their minds around and understand and get involved with. I have a sort of "pilot project" we can directly apply ISA to that I'm calling Annotated English, because I tend to be most interested in '''''very''''' "controversial" things and/or things others don't really seem to be interested in discussing ''and'' relating to everything else ''and'' taking seriously, so I came up with a relatively non-controversial starter: how can we "revise" the English language in a simple way such that we more effectively communicate our intended meaning? I hope you all could follow all that! I'll try to clear things up on post more in a few days, or a week. Until then, Karl, or anyone else who's interested PLEASE e-mail me (address is near top of page), especially if you come from a "different" perspective then me (which I've found is pretty much everyone :-), since I apparently could use the help in not procrastinating. I hope that didn't read like an infomercial. Any thoughts? I am ''very'' interested in feedback. --["Users/GabeKoulikov"] + * Hey no problem, I figured it was a combination of terms you came up with, be sure to post your thoughts when you can collect them together - but don't expect everything to fit together neatly over a summer! The english language could definitely use some improvements. -["Users/KarlMogel"]
Line 61:	Line 61:
- ''2006-06-22 14:18:36'' [[nbsp]] Okay, what I mean is that you should use your incredible influence to stop abortion, not the displays. --["SteveOstrowski"]	+ ''2006-06-22 14:18:36'' [[nbsp]] Okay, what I mean is that you should use your incredible influence to stop abortion, not the displays. --["Users/SteveOstrowski"]
Line 63:	Line 63:
- ''2006-06-22 15:56:01'' [[nbsp]] Why would I use my fabulous influence to work to stop abortions? --["JamesSchwab"]	+ ''2006-06-22 15:56:01'' [[nbsp]] Why would I use my fabulous influence to work to stop abortions? --["Users/JamesSchwab"]
Line 71:	Line 71:
- * I spent some time writing a comprehensive response to... everything, but it's too long and implies not nice things about the wiki users involved. I have '''''real life plans''''' for the rest of the night. Explanations will come along with more reasonable work when real life gives me time, and wiki drama doesn't have the practical result of things taking much, much longer (a month?!). People involved should take a ["wiki chill pill"]. Go and watch the sunset tonight if it's been a while. Seriously. All activity Steve is doing from the point of the SFLUCD page wiki lock onward are in no way associated with me unless/until I mention otherwise (whatever else anyone else may say). --["GabeKoulikov"]	+ * I spent some time writing a comprehensive response to... everything, but it's too long and implies not nice things about the wiki users involved. I have '''''real life plans''''' for the rest of the night. Explanations will come along with more reasonable work when real life gives me time, and wiki drama doesn't have the practical result of things taking much, much longer (a month?!). People involved should take a ["wiki chill pill"]. Go and watch the sunset tonight if it's been a while. Seriously. All activity Steve is doing from the point of the SFLUCD page wiki lock onward are in no way associated with me unless/until I mention otherwise (whatever else anyone else may say). --["Users/GabeKoulikov"]

Users/GabeKoulikov

BrentLaabs — 2008-08-25 18:50:11

link fix

Differences for Users/GabeKoulikov

Deletions are marked with - .	Additions are marked with +.
Line 28:	Line 28:
- * Do what ["BrentLaabs/Archive" I did] -- create an ["/Archive"] page	+ * Do what ["Users/BrentLaabs/Archive" I did] -- create an ["/Archive"] page

Users/GabeKoulikov

AlexanderHo — 2007-12-30 15:30:44

Comment added.

Differences for Users/GabeKoulikov

Deletions are marked with - .	Additions are marked with +.
Line 76:	Line 76:
	+ ------ + ''2007-12-30 15:30:44'' [[nbsp]] I may not completely agree with all of your points, but I respect you as a mild tempered, well spoken debater. --["Users/AlexanderHo"]

Users/GabeKoulikov

JasonAller — 2007-09-08 16:30:09

Differences for Users/GabeKoulikov

Deletions are marked with - .	Additions are marked with +.
Line 66:	Line 66:
- [[Include(realdavis)]]

Users/GabeKoulikov

GabeKoulikov — 2007-09-07 17:20:31

I feel like this is now a collaborative fictional story we're writing together.

Differences for Users/GabeKoulikov

Deletions are marked with - .	Additions are marked with +.
Line 72:	Line 72:
	+ * I spent some time writing a comprehensive response to... everything, but it's too long and implies not nice things about the wiki users involved. I have '''''real life plans''''' for the rest of the night. Explanations will come along with more reasonable work when real life gives me time, and wiki drama doesn't have the practical result of things taking much, much longer (a month?!). People involved should take a ["wiki chill pill"]. Go and watch the sunset tonight if it's been a while. Seriously. All activity Steve is doing from the point of the SFLUCD page wiki lock onward are in no way associated with me unless/until I mention otherwise (whatever else anyone else may say). --["GabeKoulikov"]

Users/GabeKoulikov

KarlMogel — 2007-09-07 17:05:39

modifying comment now that I see you're roomies.

Differences for Users/GabeKoulikov

Deletions are marked with - .	Additions are marked with +.
Line 75:	Line 75:
- Were you aware that Steve was going to set up a Sockpuppet account to try to bypass his ban, or did he spring that on you? Just try to be cautious about involving Steve in editing, especially since he has ''just'' gotten himself restricted. --["Users/KarlMogel"] - ------ - ''2007-09-07 16:48:12'' [[nbsp]] Ah, nevermind. You were very aware - the both of you have the same IP Address - which means you're probably in the same room, if not using the same computer. I'm rather disappointed that you've become a party to Steve abusing the wiki. What I wonder is, why didn't you cut out the middle-man and have Steve edit through your account and try to fool everyone that way? --["Users/KarlMogel"] - * Karl, they are roommates. Give Gabe a chance without assuming he's going to act like Steve. Gabe has been asking questions and seems to be trying to figure out what's right and wrong. At this point, I think he's figured out that Steve has managed to alienate an entire community of editors. Please, everybody... give him enough space and time to figure out what he's doing, and then judge the man. Just because he's roommates with Steve doesn't mean he's going to act the same way. (Doesn't mean he won't, but give him a fair chance!) --["JabberWokky"] - * Gotcha, didn't know they roomed together. -KJM	+ That he created another sockpuppet account to bypass the locks wasn't a good idea of his, and has made the situation more troublesome. Just try to be cautious about involving Steve in editing, especially since he has ''just'' gotten himself restricted. --["Users/KarlMogel"]

Users/GabeKoulikov

KarlMogel — 2007-09-07 16:28:12

Differences for Users/GabeKoulikov

Deletions are marked with - .	Additions are marked with +.
Line 79:	Line 79:
	+ * Gotcha, didn't know they roomed together. -KJM

Users/GabeKoulikov

JabberWokky — 2007-09-07 15:56:38

Reply to Karl (And everybody upset at Gabe by proximity to Steve)

Differences for Users/GabeKoulikov

Deletions are marked with - .	Additions are marked with +.
Line 78:	Line 78:
	+ * Karl, they are roommates. Give Gabe a chance without assuming he's going to act like Steve. Gabe has been asking questions and seems to be trying to figure out what's right and wrong. At this point, I think he's figured out that Steve has managed to alienate an entire community of editors. Please, everybody... give him enough space and time to figure out what he's doing, and then judge the man. Just because he's roommates with Steve doesn't mean he's going to act the same way. (Doesn't mean he won't, but give him a fair chance!) --["JabberWokky"]

Users/GabeKoulikov

KarlMogel — 2007-09-07 15:48:12

Comment added.

Differences for Users/GabeKoulikov

Deletions are marked with - .	Additions are marked with +.
Line 76:	Line 76:
	+ ------ + ''2007-09-07 16:48:12'' [[nbsp]] Ah, nevermind. You were very aware - the both of you have the same IP Address - which means you're probably in the same room, if not using the same computer. I'm rather disappointed that you've become a party to Steve abusing the wiki. What I wonder is, why didn't you cut out the middle-man and have Steve edit through your account and try to fool everyone that way? --["Users/KarlMogel"]

Users/GabeKoulikov

KarlMogel — 2007-09-07 15:36:22

Comment added.

Differences for Users/GabeKoulikov

Deletions are marked with - .	Additions are marked with +.
Line 72:	Line 72:
	+ ------ + ''2007-09-07 16:36:22'' [[nbsp]] The content on SFL about the history of the organization is pretty good so far. + + Were you aware that Steve was going to set up a Sockpuppet account to try to bypass his ban, or did he spring that on you? Just try to be cautious about involving Steve in editing, especially since he has ''just'' gotten himself restricted. --["Users/KarlMogel"]

Users/GabeKoulikov

WilliamLewis — 2007-09-07 14:44:54

(quick edit)

Differences for Users/GabeKoulikov

Deletions are marked with - .	Additions are marked with +.
Line 71:	Line 71:
- ''2007-09-07 15:39:47'' [[nbsp]] We as a community decided that Steve should not be able to work on the pages has abused as of late. Edits that he makes WILL NOT be allowed to stand and the accounts he created to circumvent the lock will be banned. If you don't like the page how it is, feel free to work on it on your own. If Steve uses you to edit it, your edits will be tainted and removed. Why the gutting, anyway? --["Users/WilliamLewis"]	+ ''2007-09-07 15:39:47'' [[nbsp]] We as a community decided that Steve should not be able to work on the pages has abused as of late. Edits that he makes WILL NOT be allowed to stand and the accounts he created to circumvent the lock will be banned. If you don't like the page how it is, feel free to work on it on your own. If Steve uses you to edit it, your edits will be tainted and removed. Let me repeat myself: WORKING WITH STEVE IS CIRCUMVENTING THE LOCK AND ALL THE WORK DONE WITH HIM IS POISONED. Why the gutting, anyway? --["Users/WilliamLewis"]

Users/GabeKoulikov

WilliamLewis — 2007-09-07 14:40:18

(quick edit)

Differences for Users/GabeKoulikov

Deletions are marked with - .	Additions are marked with +.
Line 71:	Line 71:
- ''2007-09-07 15:39:47'' [[nbsp]] We as a community decided that Steve should not be able to work on the pages has abused as of late. Edits that he makes WILL NOT be allowed to stand. If you don't like the page how it is, feel free to work on it on your own. If Steve uses you to edit it, your edits will be tainted and removed. Why the gutting, anyway? --["Users/WilliamLewis"]	+ ''2007-09-07 15:39:47'' [[nbsp]] We as a community decided that Steve should not be able to work on the pages has abused as of late. Edits that he makes WILL NOT be allowed to stand and the accounts he created to circumvent the lock will be banned. If you don't like the page how it is, feel free to work on it on your own. If Steve uses you to edit it, your edits will be tainted and removed. Why the gutting, anyway? --["Users/WilliamLewis"]

Users/GabeKoulikov

WilliamLewis — 2007-09-07 14:39:47

Comment added.

Differences for Users/GabeKoulikov

Deletions are marked with - .	Additions are marked with +.
Line 70:	Line 70:
	+ ------ + ''2007-09-07 15:39:47'' [[nbsp]] We as a community decided that Steve should not be able to work on the pages has abused as of late. Edits that he makes WILL NOT be allowed to stand. If you don't like the page how it is, feel free to work on it on your own. If Steve uses you to edit it, your edits will be tainted and removed. Why the gutting, anyway? --["Users/WilliamLewis"]

Users/GabeKoulikov

WilliamLewis — 2007-09-06 18:44:10

Comment added.

Differences for Users/GabeKoulikov

Deletions are marked with - .	Additions are marked with +.
Line 68:	Line 68:
	+ ------ + ''2007-09-06 19:44:10'' [[nbsp]] I'd buy you a beer if I could legally buy beer and if you actually drank beer. --["Users/WilliamLewis"]

Users/GabeKoulikov

KarlMogel — 2007-09-06 12:05:24

Comment added.

Differences for Users/GabeKoulikov

Deletions are marked with - .	Additions are marked with +.
Line 64:	Line 64:
	+ ------ + ''2007-09-06 13:05:24'' [[nbsp]] Hi Gabe, thanks for spilling the beans on the Steve Ostrowski page. He's been playing games with the facts for some time on the wiki, and his reaction to your comment may have pushed the other editors over the edge with regard to his status as a user of the wiki. It would be nice while checking the recent changes page, to not have to see him clogging it up with still more re-wordings of meaningless puppet pages of his. Once again, it can be about Davis! + [[Include(realdavis)]] + I'll get you those papers about human chromosome 2, might have time to dig them up next week. --["Users/KarlMogel"]

Users/GabeKoulikov

GabeKoulikov — 2007-08-08 12:01:18

Posting stuff online explanation

Differences for Users/GabeKoulikov

Deletions are marked with - .	Additions are marked with +.
Line 19:	Line 19:
	+ + '''Explanation: Why I try to post everything about myself and what I do online:''' + *Note: this is a subset of "Gabe is willing to talk with anyone about anything without qualification," with only slight modification based on time limitations, kind of relationship, interest level of the other person/people, and other contextual elements. ''Consider this an invitation.'' + -I only refer people to my online stuff to prevent me having to repeat the same general info 100+ times per month, or whatever. The next best alternative solution is to begin telling certain people, "I have no time for you," which is something I am not willing to do; I aim to serve/answer/whatever anyone who's up for talking/doing something with/asking help/service/assistance of me, and practical concerns such as this inevitably creep up. + -I like people. I believe this is part of being pro-life. + -Posting everything online (and being willing to talk about whatever) also helps me be completely transparent (i.e. I have nothing to hide), have some measure of comprehensive accountability, allows for greater feedback, helps address complacency issues (hypocrisy, apathy, and compromise to reinforce uncompromising proactive integrity), provides greatest opportunity for correction of errors (in particular, my own errors/false beliefs), and I believe sets a good example in too many ways to list here (such as to encourage people not to be inhibited when it comes to exploring all truth). + -For those that say, "Only a fool speaks his whole mind": well.... (appearances can be deceiving)

Users/GabeKoulikov

GabeKoulikov — 2007-06-18 12:46:55

Image gabebeardsmall.jpg deleted.

Users/GabeKoulikov

GabeKoulikov — 2007-06-18 12:45:28

Upload of image gabebeardsmall.jpg.

Users/GabeKoulikov

GabeKoulikov — 2007-06-18 12:37:45

Added updated photo of myself

Differences for Users/GabeKoulikov

Deletions are marked with - .	Additions are marked with +.
Line 1:	Line 1:
- [[Image(gabepicturenew.jpg, thumbnail)]][[Image(gabepicture.jpg, "How Gabe looked during his first two years in Davis", right, thumbnail)]]	+ [[Image(gabepicturebeard.jpg, thumbnail)]][[Image(gabepicturenew.jpg, "2005-2006", right, thumbnail)]][[Image(gabepicture.jpg, "How Gabe looked during his first two years in Davis, 2003-2005", right, thumbnail)]]

Users/GabeKoulikov

GabeKoulikov — 2007-06-18 12:34:19

Upload of image gabepicturebeard.jpg.

Users/GabeKoulikov

GabeKoulikov — 2007-05-18 10:24:08

Link to my fiction writings posted online

Differences for Users/GabeKoulikov

Deletions are marked with - .	Additions are marked with +.
Line 17:	Line 17:
	+ * [http://changethesystem.livejournal.com/profile My fiction writings, up-to-date]

Users/GabeKoulikov

GabeKoulikov — 2007-04-11 23:51:39

Added Netcipia

Differences for Users/GabeKoulikov

Deletions are marked with - .	Additions are marked with +.
Line 16:	Line 16:
	+ * [http://changethesystem.netcipia.net My Netcipia, website under construction]

Users/GabeKoulikov

BrentLaabs — 2007-03-28 14:24:26

answering the question

Differences for Users/GabeKoulikov

Deletions are marked with - .	Additions are marked with +.
Line 19:	Line 19:
	+ * Do what ["BrentLaabs/Archive" I did] -- create an ["/Archive"] page

Users/GabeKoulikov

GabeKoulikov — 2007-03-28 12:59:45

Biographical reduction and YouTube link

Differences for Users/GabeKoulikov

Deletions are marked with - .	Additions are marked with +.
Line 2:	Line 2:
- '''Update: I'm starting to accept that I will always be misunderstood and misinterpreted by people in general, and so am finally starting to seriously deal with it (hopefully). This should be interesting....''' - * For now the key is to understand that unless I'm not being as diligent as I should, everything I do is to better understand reality and behave in accordance with that better understanding in order to make the most of life and maximize the opportunity for others do the same.
Line 5:	Line 3:
- '''Name:''' Gabriel Koulikov, ["UC Davis" UCD] ["Undergraduate Students" undergrad]. - - '''Office:''' I plan to have "office hours" where anyone can talk with me in my self-disciplined schedule.	+ '''Name:''' Gabriel Koulikov
Line 10:	Line 6:
- '''...related:''' It occurs to me that I sometimes don't get back to people in a timely manner because I have so many different things that I do, and very many people I communicate with, so don't take it the wrong way if it takes me a while to get back to you, and don't be afraid to send me extra messages or to stress to me how important it is that I get back to you in a timely way. Many of the things that I end up talking with people about often I am in the process of posting online to help with this. The more mutually beneficial we can make our relationship, the more likely I seem to be to stay in contact with an individual. - * I sincerely apologize to all I have been flakey with getting back to; I am trying to be more consistent. Please do not interpret this as anything more than I have lots of important things/people to vie for my attention. - * If anyone has any advice for how to stay in contact better and "not waste time" or opportunities when you're trying to understand everything, please contact me! - * I am most interested in recieving any relevent feedback people have to give me during my life research; it is very difficult to learn most of this stuff on your own without people pointing things out, so contact me.
Line 15:	Line 7:
- '''Personality:''' In short: like a confused little kid trying to make sense of the big world in the most hardcore way possible. His life motto is "always demand consistency," and everything else about his approach to life/beliefs can be derived from this motto, supposedly. - - '''One word self-description:''' Science. - - '''New Major:''' ["Science and Technology Studies"] (w00t! Finally an "academic excuse" for why I am in college!). - - '''Origin:''' Born and raised in the Greater Sacramento Area (moved from a Russian ethnic neighborhood in Bryte/["West Sacramento" West Sac] to the land of chicken crossings and toilet races, a.k.a. [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fair_Oaks%2C_California Fair Oaks], at age 6). Transfer Student from ["American River College"] in Sacramento (moved to ["Davis"] at age 20). - - '''Ongoing Research Project:''' Interdisciplinary Science Activism (ISA). (See comments below for more) - * In my research, which permeates all areas of my life without exception, I sometimes ask questions in public or to people that may come off as very strange and/or intimidating. This is usually to better understand something, or to "think differently" about something, or see how someone else "thinks differently" about something, or to better understand the other person involved. Some people seem to be intimidated by this, or misinterpret it as me being full of myself and arrogant (especially if I ask the other person to defend their view, or try to explain my best understanding on a subject that I don't have much knowledge on), or that I'm making others "think like me." Is this something I should do something about, or just get used to as an inevitable consequence of my comprehensive reality research? - - '''Sexuality/Relationships:''' Since many have expressed interest, I have ''for the record'' deliberately chosen to be celibate for the rest of my life, and I mean celibacy in the broad sense. This means no romantic/"special" relationships (all relationships with me are to be based on mutual benefit and equality/equity, which I try to make explicit, and any major differences in my relationships are based on the trust level we share and/or what we are trying to accomplish in the relationship). This also means no sex of any kind or sense or bodily location, and also no flirting (all expressions of affection are to be likewise based on the trust level, kindness/mutual respect, and the context of the situation in which they are expressed). So there you have both the positive and negative definitions of how I approach/express my sexuality and relationships. Summary: '''''I am taken''''' [by my quest for Truth/truth, morality, and appropriate human expression], and it's exclusive, and in my best understanding, it is better this way than any other way (explanation coming soon). I hope this explains some misunderstandings? - * Since relationships with other people is an aspect of reality, all relationships are included in my research. - * This has become very important to me; please let me know if you notice any problems, and I will be very grateful/thankful.	+ '''Update:''' The bio previously on this page I now see was poorly worded, somewhat out of date, and at times misleading. I’ll post an updated version on my LJ userinfo page soon.
Line 32:	Line 11:
- * [http://www.xanga.com/doubleg_2nd My secondary blog, Xanga]	+ * [http://www.xanga.com/doubleg_2nd My less-used secondary blog, Xanga]
Line 36:	Line 15:
	+ * [http://www.youtube.com/profile?user=GabrielKoulikov My YouTube channel]
Line 38:	Line 18:
- Give me a moment while I catch up and prioritize. I still have some time. I'll probably reduce this to minimum and move the wordy stuff somewhere else.... - - In the mean time: the reason why I try to make everything about myself "public" is in the hopes that someone, somewhere will either get something from what I have to say that will matter in the grand scheme of things, and that everyone might point out to me where I really may be onto something, and where I just have insanity (preferably also explaining why they see things that way, that we may both have a mutual understanding). So: I say/do whatever I say/do to be of service, and as anti-insanity meds, both aspects requiring others' feedback so as to prevent totalitarian-ish stuff, etc.. - - I'm thinking about what parts of my page should be in first person, or in third person. Why do some choose first vs. third person on their wiki pages? - - My deepest thanks to everyone who has ever helped me since I started exploring Davis. - - '''''Personality note:''''' In general, unless I specify otherwise, I mean ''everything'' both seriously and in a joking way. I (for some reason) think this makes it both easier to understand what I am saying, and to be comfortable with me and/or my style. I also deliberately try to make myself easy to predict. (what do you think?)	+ Is there a way to save or archive your older wiki comments without deleting them?

Users/GabeKoulikov

GabeKoulikov — 2006-11-02 16:45:36

Bio: Public service and anti-insanity

Differences for Users/GabeKoulikov

Deletions are marked with - .	Additions are marked with +.
Line 38:	Line 38:
- Give me a moment while I catch up and prioritize. I still have some time.	+ Give me a moment while I catch up and prioritize. I still have some time. I'll probably reduce this to minimum and move the wordy stuff somewhere else.... + + In the mean time: the reason why I try to make everything about myself "public" is in the hopes that someone, somewhere will either get something from what I have to say that will matter in the grand scheme of things, and that everyone might point out to me where I really may be onto something, and where I just have insanity (preferably also explaining why they see things that way, that we may both have a mutual understanding). So: I say/do whatever I say/do to be of service, and as anti-insanity meds, both aspects requiring others' feedback so as to prevent totalitarian-ish stuff, etc..

Users/GabeKoulikov

GabeKoulikov — 2006-09-03 15:55:44

Update: acceptance of misinterpretations

Differences for Users/GabeKoulikov

Deletions are marked with - .	Additions are marked with +.
Line 2:	Line 2:
	+ '''Update: I'm starting to accept that I will always be misunderstood and misinterpreted by people in general, and so am finally starting to seriously deal with it (hopefully). This should be interesting....''' + * For now the key is to understand that unless I'm not being as diligent as I should, everything I do is to better understand reality and behave in accordance with that better understanding in order to make the most of life and maximize the opportunity for others do the same.

Users/GabeKoulikov

GabeKoulikov — 2006-08-24 14:06:50

Internet Hub linkage

Differences for Users/GabeKoulikov

Deletions are marked with - .	Additions are marked with +.
Line 11:	Line 11:
	+ * I am most interested in recieving any relevent feedback people have to give me during my life research; it is very difficult to learn most of this stuff on your own without people pointing things out, so contact me.
Line 27:	Line 28:
- '''Looking Ahead''' (from my previous two years at UCD, etc.): I seem to have skipped several necessary steps in my lifes journey in an attempt to keep up with where I wanted to go, and had to learn the hard way how essential some of those steps were. I sincerely apologize if I stepped on any toes (or faces, or whatever), and whatever else I may have done, or failed to do. We will now see how this step-by-step approach goes. If anyone would like to contact me during this time, you know how. I would appreciate your input.	+ '''Finally putting things online:''' I have started putting things about myself and my research online. The following is a semi-comprehensive list for those who would like to keep track of me or what I'm up to: + * [http://doubleg.livejournal.com My main blog, LJ] + * [http://www.xanga.com/doubleg_2nd My secondary blog, Xanga] + * [http://www.myspace.com/doubleg_3rd My MySpace] + * [http://ucdavis.facebook.com/profile.php?id=3209227 My Facebook] + * [http://www.43things.com/person/changethesystem My 43 Things] + * All roads lead back to the wiki.
Line 29:	Line 36:
- Gabe plans to use this page as the hub of his internet presence (i.e. all info online concerning him), once he has time in his schedule and disciplines himself to tackle it.	+ Give me a moment while I catch up and prioritize. I still have some time.

Users/GabeKoulikov

GabeKoulikov — 2006-08-09 21:24:57

Research project questions

Differences for Users/GabeKoulikov

Deletions are marked with - .	Additions are marked with +.
Line 21:	Line 21:
	+ * In my research, which permeates all areas of my life without exception, I sometimes ask questions in public or to people that may come off as very strange and/or intimidating. This is usually to better understand something, or to "think differently" about something, or see how someone else "thinks differently" about something, or to better understand the other person involved. Some people seem to be intimidated by this, or misinterpret it as me being full of myself and arrogant (especially if I ask the other person to defend their view, or try to explain my best understanding on a subject that I don't have much knowledge on), or that I'm making others "think like me." Is this something I should do something about, or just get used to as an inevitable consequence of my comprehensive reality research?

Users/GabeKoulikov

GabeKoulikov — 2006-08-08 16:44:14

Explaining flakiness in keeping in touch.

Differences for Users/GabeKoulikov

Deletions are marked with - .	Additions are marked with +.
Line 8:	Line 8:
	+ '''...related:''' It occurs to me that I sometimes don't get back to people in a timely manner because I have so many different things that I do, and very many people I communicate with, so don't take it the wrong way if it takes me a while to get back to you, and don't be afraid to send me extra messages or to stress to me how important it is that I get back to you in a timely way. Many of the things that I end up talking with people about often I am in the process of posting online to help with this. The more mutually beneficial we can make our relationship, the more likely I seem to be to stay in contact with an individual. + * I sincerely apologize to all I have been flakey with getting back to; I am trying to be more consistent. Please do not interpret this as anything more than I have lots of important things/people to vie for my attention. + * If anyone has any advice for how to stay in contact better and "not waste time" or opportunities when you're trying to understand everything, please contact me!
Line 52:	Line 55:
- Here are some pictures of embrological and fetal development:	+ Here are some pictures of embryological and fetal development:

Users/GabeKoulikov

GabeKoulikov — 2006-08-07 12:15:24

Added section on Sexuality/Relationships

Differences for Users/GabeKoulikov

Deletions are marked with - .	Additions are marked with +.
Line 18:	Line 18:
	+ + '''Sexuality/Relationships:''' Since many have expressed interest, I have ''for the record'' deliberately chosen to be celibate for the rest of my life, and I mean celibacy in the broad sense. This means no romantic/"special" relationships (all relationships with me are to be based on mutual benefit and equality/equity, which I try to make explicit, and any major differences in my relationships are based on the trust level we share and/or what we are trying to accomplish in the relationship). This also means no sex of any kind or sense or bodily location, and also no flirting (all expressions of affection are to be likewise based on the trust level, kindness/mutual respect, and the context of the situation in which they are expressed). So there you have both the positive and negative definitions of how I approach/express my sexuality and relationships. Summary: '''''I am taken''''' [by my quest for Truth/truth, morality, and appropriate human expression], and it's exclusive, and in my best understanding, it is better this way than any other way (explanation coming soon). I hope this explains some misunderstandings? + * Since relationships with other people is an aspect of reality, all relationships are included in my research. + * This has become very important to me; please let me know if you notice any problems, and I will be very grateful/thankful.

Users/GabeKoulikov

KarlMogel — 2006-06-30 13:23:41

linky

Differences for Users/GabeKoulikov

Deletions are marked with - .	Additions are marked with +.
Line 52:	Line 52:
- * Interesting - they label the same fetus as being 10 weeks old, then 9 weeks old, then 10 weeks old... That's pretty sloppy. Already the expertise of their "doctor" seems dubious. (And if you'll look at the Matthew 28:10 page, they label the EXACT SAME image as being both 9 weeks and 10 weeks of age.) And if I'm not mistaken, the head pictured by the jar, and later on its own looks like its the one that was a preserved stillborn (the possessor of which was arrested for possessing it) and not an aborted fetus. Thus the formaldehyde jar. -KJM	+ * Interesting - they label the same fetus as being 10 weeks old, then 9 weeks old, then 10 weeks old... That's pretty sloppy. Already the expertise of their "doctor" seems dubious. (And if you'll look at the Matthew 28:20 page, they label the EXACT SAME image as being both 9 weeks and 10 weeks of age.) And if I'm not mistaken, the head pictured by the jar, and later on its own looks like its the one that was a preserved stillborn (the possessor of which was arrested for possessing it) and not an aborted fetus. Thus the formaldehyde jar. -KJM
Line 54:	Line 54:
	+ * Ok, there was no need to provide another link to their pictures for the 9-10 week mistakes, as you provided the link above. I then gave you directions for how to get to the other mistakes: ''if you'll look on the Matthew 28:20 page'', which would get you to [http://www.abortionno.org/Matt/matt_signs.html THIS] page, check out pictures # 4 and 6 - they are the exact same image, yet, are labeled differently. I hope this is simple enough for you to follow, as you suggested, we should remember who we're talking to. :) J/K I'm afraid I don't have time today to investigate the preserved stillborn surmise, but I'll investigate it soon enough and let you know. (working on an essay contest.) -["KarlMogel"]

Users/GabeKoulikov

GabeKoulikov — 2006-06-30 11:13:59

Comment (skepticism)

Differences for Users/GabeKoulikov

Deletions are marked with - .	Additions are marked with +.
Line 53:	Line 53:
	+ * "Pretty sloppy"?; I could say the same for your response, especially coming from another science guy. I have no way of verifying what you have asserted. Please provide some form of evidence/link. The 9-10 week tells me nothing other than “9 weeks” and “10 weeks” are arbitrary categories that bump up against each other. Like I said, I’m a skeptic. Please help me do my skeptic thing! (arguing for your points in a clear, concise, straightforward manner helps also) --["GabeKoulikov"]

Users/GabeKoulikov

KarlMogel — 2006-06-30 03:00:07

blatant

Differences for Users/GabeKoulikov

Deletions are marked with - .	Additions are marked with +.
Line 52:	Line 52:
- * Interesting - they label the same fetus as being 10 weeks old, then 9 weeks old, then 10 weeks old... That's pretty sloppy. Already the expertise of their "doctor" seems dubious. And if I'm not mistaken, the head pictured by the jar, and later on its own looks like its the one that was a preserved stillborn (the possessor of which was arrested for possessing it) and not an aborted fetus. Thus the formaldehyde jar. -KJM	+ * Interesting - they label the same fetus as being 10 weeks old, then 9 weeks old, then 10 weeks old... That's pretty sloppy. Already the expertise of their "doctor" seems dubious. (And if you'll look at the Matthew 28:10 page, they label the EXACT SAME image as being both 9 weeks and 10 weeks of age.) And if I'm not mistaken, the head pictured by the jar, and later on its own looks like its the one that was a preserved stillborn (the possessor of which was arrested for possessing it) and not an aborted fetus. Thus the formaldehyde jar. -KJM

Users/GabeKoulikov

KarlMogel — 2006-06-30 02:53:37

okie

Differences for Users/GabeKoulikov

Deletions are marked with - .	Additions are marked with +.
Line 52:	Line 52:
	+ * Interesting - they label the same fetus as being 10 weeks old, then 9 weeks old, then 10 weeks old... That's pretty sloppy. Already the expertise of their "doctor" seems dubious. And if I'm not mistaken, the head pictured by the jar, and later on its own looks like its the one that was a preserved stillborn (the possessor of which was arrested for possessing it) and not an aborted fetus. Thus the formaldehyde jar. -KJM
Line 55:	Line 56:
	+ * Hey no problem, I figured it was a combination of terms you came up with, be sure to post your thoughts when you can collect them together - but don't expect everything to fit together neatly over a summer! The english language could definitely use some improvements. -["KarlMogel"]

Users/GabeKoulikov

GabeKoulikov — 2006-06-30 00:28:12

Comment on GAP photos

Differences for Users/GabeKoulikov

Deletions are marked with - .	Additions are marked with +.
Line 47:	Line 47:
	+ * So you would like me to go first, I take it. To be honest, I am a skeptic, although I consider myself pretty lazy, but every time I look into it, I only see evidence which supports that the GAP photos depict what they say they do, including from my classes at UCD. Have you taken any of UCD's embryology classes (ex: MCB150)? Seriously, these pictures are in textbooks which the UCD bookstore sells! Who told you/where did you hear that these pictures were fakes? + Here are some pictures of embrological and fetal development: + [http://embryo.soad.umich.edu/carnStages/stage18/stage18.html] (This is the earliest stage where you can see all of the easily recognizable human characteristics @ ~44 days old. These pages go until about "stage 23". This is from the [http://embryo.soad.umich.edu/ embryology department of the University of Michigan] which has references) + [http://www.mhhe.com/socscience/sex/common/ibank/ibank/0113.jpg Embryo and Fetal Growth picture] (This is relative sizes and features of developing pre-born human individuals. Note that 9 months of pregnancy=36 weeks, and that these pictures only go to ≤15 weeks, or early in the 2nd trimester. This is from the McGraw-Hill Higher Education website, a major textbook publisher) + I'm sure you can find even more and better photos using Google image search, or other more trustworthy science sources. Now compare these to the graphic photos on [http://www.abortionno.org/GAP/gap_signs.html the GAP signs] and see how they match up with the identified development times for yourself (many of the GAP pictures have common objects for you to be able to more easily make a size comparison). Seriously, James, where did you get the idea that these pictures are photoshopped/staged? Please know that I am open to correction. I am always thankful for constructive and insightful discussion. --["GabeKoulikov"]

Users/GabeKoulikov

GabeKoulikov — 2006-06-29 23:00:18

ISA comment

Differences for Users/GabeKoulikov

Deletions are marked with - .	Additions are marked with +.
Line 17:	Line 17:
- '''Ongoing Research Project:''' Interdisciplinary Science Activism (ISA).	+ '''Ongoing Research Project:''' Interdisciplinary Science Activism (ISA). (See comments below for more)
Line 49:	Line 49:
	+ * Time + real life = procrastination at answering your question, in case that makes you feel less ignored (I have been paying attention). I'm very sorry, Karl, as I've internalized some bad habits like procrastination; ISA is the main thing I'm into, and I was supposed to have all kinds of stuff posted online over a year ago (!), but I thank you for your persistent interest, as it is apparently anti-procrastinatory. ISA is a way of 'testing' to see if there is anything that can be comprehensively done about all the screwed up stuff in the world. From my investigations, observations, and experiences I do not believe that academics, activists, or even the "average person" (really nobody) are doing things appropriately (allow me to explain when I have some more time), so I am trying to come up with something anyone/everyone can do regardless of their sociocultural/temporal context, level of ability, etc., to "help the most people in the best way that lasts the longest." Someone recently challenged me with "help them do what?" which I have currently developed to "help them have the maximized opportunity to do that which is most consistent with reality." These are left deliberately vague (for lack of a better term) in order that we can have multiple comprehensive, scientifically testable and mentally/emotionally/spiritually "satisfying" and practically applicable models of reality be allowed to duke it out through some appropriate combination of cooperation and competition so we can finally figure out what we're supposed to be doing, whether that's objective, subjective, or something involving both, and not let the process of discovery get in our way of doing something now! (I.e. ISA as the general framework everyone can work in, with these models as their own main project/movement/whatever they end up turning into) That's about all I've been able to develop on my own, and so I need to "go public" ASAP, definitely before the end of the Summer. I'm currently working on my own "comprehensive model for reality," and just have to pull everything together and hope that I have something that most people can wrap their minds around and understand and get involved with. I have a sort of "pilot project" we can directly apply ISA to that I'm calling Annotated English, because I tend to be most interested in '''''very''''' "controversial" things and/or things others don't really seem to be interested in discussing ''and'' relating to everything else ''and'' taking seriously, so I came up with a relatively non-controversial starter: how can we "revise" the English language in a simple way such that we more effectively communicate our intended meaning? I hope you all could follow all that! I'll try to clear things up on post more in a few days, or a week. Until then, Karl, or anyone else who's interested PLEASE e-mail me (address is near top of page), especially if you come from a "different" perspective then me (which I've found is pretty much everyone :-), since I apparently could use the help in not procrastinating. I hope that didn't read like an infomercial. Any thoughts? I am ''very'' interested in feedback. --["GabeKoulikov"]

Users/GabeKoulikov

KarlMogel — 2006-06-29 20:46:39

commentski

Differences for Users/GabeKoulikov

Deletions are marked with - .	Additions are marked with +.
Line 47:	Line 47:
	+ * On their website, they cite a doctor who swears that they are accurate, however, I have found many news stories where they have been accused of pushing the ages of the fetuses to portray them as being more developed than they really are. Even so, the people presenting don't know a lot about the facts involved - for example, the woman I talked to asserted that a human pharyngula-stage embryo that I showed her could think and feel - despite the fact that it has no brain, go figure. Her criterion of egg + sperm = human being doesn't apply to cloned embryos, which took her about 5 minutes to acknowledge, and she couldn't seem to figure out whether a thinking, feeling human clone (in the future) would be considered "life" in the sense that she uses it. Couple that with the fact that she doesn't accept the common descent of humans and chimpanzees, and when I pointed out to her that her humans-beget humans and chimps-beget-chimps falls apart 5.4 million years ago when they last interbred. I asked her to enter into a thought experiment and assume, even though she doesn't believe it to be true, that humans and chimps descended from the same species, so how could she justify treating humans and chimps differently, and she refused to enter the thought experiment. Finally, she said she hasn't much thought about it. ''And you're going from campus to campus with these signs without having thought much about it...?'' Not much for thinking. + Gabe, so what's that ISA thing, or are you purposefully ignoring my question? -["KarlMogel" KJM]

Users/GabeKoulikov

JamesSchwab — 2006-06-29 12:16:41

Differences for Users/GabeKoulikov

Deletions are marked with - .	Additions are marked with +.
Line 46:	Line 46:
	+ * What is you '''evidence''' that they are pictures of aborted fetuses?

Users/GabeKoulikov

GabeKoulikov — 2006-06-28 23:50:11

Personality note

Differences for Users/GabeKoulikov

Deletions are marked with - .	Additions are marked with +.
Line 27:	Line 27:
	+ '''''Personality note:''''' In general, unless I specify otherwise, I mean ''everything'' both seriously and in a joking way. I (for some reason) think this makes it both easier to understand what I am saying, and to be comfortable with me and/or my style. I also deliberately try to make myself easy to predict. (what do you think?) +

Users/GabeKoulikov

GabeKoulikov — 2006-06-28 23:43:44

comment

Differences for Users/GabeKoulikov

Deletions are marked with - .	Additions are marked with +.
Line 38:	Line 38:
- Can you be more specific about what you mean by "not scientifically accurate"? In what way(s) specifically were the pictures inaccurate? --["GabeKoulikov"]	+ * Can you be more specific about what you mean by "not scientifically accurate"? In what way(s) specifically were the pictures inaccurate? --["GabeKoulikov"]
Line 42:	Line 42:
- LOL. -["KarlMogel" KJM]	+ * LOL. -["KarlMogel" KJM] + * Where is your '''evidence''' that this is indeed the case? (Remember who you're talking to) --["GabeKoulikov"]

Users/GabeKoulikov

KarlMogel — 2006-06-26 14:36:53

Differences for Users/GabeKoulikov

Deletions are marked with - .	Additions are marked with +.
Line 41:	Line 41:
- * The pictures were said to be aborted fetuses, they were not. The pictures were of abandoned babies, still born babies, and a doll's hand next to a quarter.	+ * The pictures were said to be aborted fetuses, they were not. The pictures were of abandoned babies, still born babies, and a doll's hand next to a quarter. --["JamesSchwab"] + LOL. -["KarlMogel" KJM]

Users/GabeKoulikov

JamesSchwab — 2006-06-26 08:58:05

Differences for Users/GabeKoulikov

Deletions are marked with - .	Additions are marked with +.
Line 41:	Line 41:
	+ * The pictures were said to be aborted fetuses, they were not. The pictures were of abandoned babies, still born babies, and a doll's hand next to a quarter.

Users/GabeKoulikov

KarlMogel — 2006-06-25 23:46:26

comment

Differences for Users/GabeKoulikov

Deletions are marked with - .	Additions are marked with +.
Line 39:	Line 39:
	+ * I think a conflict between Steve and James has bled onto your page. Even though I don't know what exactly James meant, I might also add that the presenters were not scientifically literate. I recorded an interview with one of them wherein they said that it takes a human egg and a sperm to make a human being, they didn't seem to understand that clones don't involve sperm cells at all, and that their criterion didn't apply - yet, they thought it was wrong to kill cloned embryos. When I pointed out this and other flaws, they said that they "felt tricked." + Anyway, I can't seem to find anything resembling 'Interdisciplinary Science Activism (ISA)' on the net, what is it? -["KarlMogel" KJM]

Users/GabeKoulikov

GabeKoulikov — 2006-06-25 15:51:54

Comment

Differences for Users/GabeKoulikov

Deletions are marked with - .	Additions are marked with +.
Line 37:	Line 37:
- ''2006-06-22 14:09:21'' [[nbsp]] I believe in free speech so I would not work try and stop their presentation. I would inform thoe who saw the pictures that they were not scientifically accurate. Their reality is not reality. --["JamesSchwab"]	+ ''2006-06-22 14:09:21'' [[nbsp]] I believe in free speech so I would not work try and stop their presentation. I would inform those who saw the pictures that they were not scientifically accurate. Their reality is not reality. --["JamesSchwab"] + Can you be more specific about what you mean by "not scientifically accurate"? In what way(s) specifically were the pictures inaccurate? --["GabeKoulikov"]

Users/GabeKoulikov

JamesSchwab — 2006-06-22 14:56:01

Comment added.

Differences for Users/GabeKoulikov

Deletions are marked with - .	Additions are marked with +.
Line 40:	Line 40:
	+ ------ + ''2006-06-22 15:56:01'' [[nbsp]] Why would I use my fabulous influence to work to stop abortions? --["JamesSchwab"]

Users/GabeKoulikov

SteveOstrowski — 2006-06-22 13:18:36

Comment added.

Differences for Users/GabeKoulikov

Deletions are marked with - .	Additions are marked with +.
Line 38:	Line 38:
	+ ------ + ''2006-06-22 14:18:36'' [[nbsp]] Okay, what I mean is that you should use your incredible influence to stop abortion, not the displays. --["SteveOstrowski"]

Users/GabeKoulikov

JamesSchwab — 2006-06-22 13:09:21

Comment added.

Differences for Users/GabeKoulikov

Deletions are marked with - .	Additions are marked with +.
Line 36:	Line 36:
	+ ------ + ''2006-06-22 14:09:21'' [[nbsp]] I believe in free speech so I would not work try and stop their presentation. I would inform thoe who saw the pictures that they were not scientifically accurate. Their reality is not reality. --["JamesSchwab"]

Users/GabeKoulikov

SteveOstrowski — 2006-06-22 08:06:55

Spelling

Differences for Users/GabeKoulikov

Deletions are marked with - .	Additions are marked with +.
Line 33:	Line 33:
- ''2006-06-22 00:09:54'' [[nbsp]] Gabe is won of the founders of students for life at ucd. He is responsible for the people who brought the disgusting photos equating the holocaust to abortion. --["JamesSchwab"]	+ ''2006-06-22 00:09:54'' [[nbsp]] Gabe is one of the founders of Students for Life at UCD. He is responsible for the people who brought the disgusting photos equating the holocaust to abortion. --["JamesSchwab"]

Users/GabeKoulikov

SteveOstrowski — 2006-06-22 08:05:26

Comment added.

Differences for Users/GabeKoulikov

Deletions are marked with - .	Additions are marked with +.
Line 34:	Line 34:
	+ ------ + ''2006-06-22 09:05:26'' [[nbsp]] Okay, this will probably cause chaos and disruption but I disagree Schwab. Reality is reality and if you don't like the pictures you should work to have it stopped. --["SteveOstrowski"]

Users/GabeKoulikov

JamesSchwab — 2006-06-21 23:09:54

Comment added.

Differences for Users/GabeKoulikov

Deletions are marked with - .	Additions are marked with +.
Line 32:	Line 32:
	+ ------ + ''2006-06-22 00:09:54'' [[nbsp]] Gabe is won of the founders of students for life at ucd. He is responsible for the people who brought the disgusting photos equating the holocaust to abortion. --["JamesSchwab"]

Users/GabeKoulikov

KarlMogel — 2006-06-21 21:37:33

Comment added.

Differences for Users/GabeKoulikov

Deletions are marked with - .	Additions are marked with +.
Line 30:	Line 30:
	+ ------ + ''2006-06-21 22:37:33'' [[nbsp]] What is 'Interdisciplinary Science Activism (ISA)'? I'm intrigued. Congrats on your graduation, BTW. --["KarlMogel"]

Users/GabeKoulikov

GabeKoulikov — 2006-04-14 20:33:16

Picture comment change

Differences for Users/GabeKoulikov

Deletions are marked with - .	Additions are marked with +.
Line 1:	Line 1:
- [[Thumbnail(gabepicturenew.jpg)]][[Thumbnail(gabepicture.jpg, right, "Gabe during his first two years in Davis")]]	+ [[Image(gabepicturenew.jpg, thumbnail)]][[Image(gabepicture.jpg, "How Gabe looked during his first two years in Davis", right, thumbnail)]]
Line 19:	Line 19:
- '''Looking Ahead''' (from my previous two years at UCD, etc.): - I seem to have skipped several necessary steps in my lifes journey in an attempt to keep up with where I wanted to go, and had to learn the hard way how essential some of those steps were. I sincerely apologize if I stepped on any toes (or faces, or whatever), and whatever else I may have done, or failed to do. We will now see how this step-by-step approach goes. If anyone would like to contact me during this time, you know how. I would appreciate your input.	+ '''Looking Ahead''' (from my previous two years at UCD, etc.): I seem to have skipped several necessary steps in my lifes journey in an attempt to keep up with where I wanted to go, and had to learn the hard way how essential some of those steps were. I sincerely apologize if I stepped on any toes (or faces, or whatever), and whatever else I may have done, or failed to do. We will now see how this step-by-step approach goes. If anyone would like to contact me during this time, you know how. I would appreciate your input.
Line 28:	Line 27:
- [[Stats(GabeKoulikov)]] - [[Comments]]	+ [[Stats(GabeKoulikov)]] [[Comments]]

Users/GabeKoulikov

GabeKoulikov — 2006-04-14 20:31:49

Fixing pictures

Differences for Users/GabeKoulikov

Deletions are marked with - .	Additions are marked with +.
Line 1:	Line 1:
- [[Thumbnail(gabepicturenew.jpg]] - [[Thumbnail(gabepicture.jpg)]]	+ [[Thumbnail(gabepicturenew.jpg)]][[Thumbnail(gabepicture.jpg, right, "Gabe during his first two years in Davis")]]

Users/GabeKoulikov

GabeKoulikov — 2006-04-14 20:21:49

New picture

Differences for Users/GabeKoulikov

Deletions are marked with - .	Additions are marked with +.
Line 1:	Line 1:
- - attachment:photo.jpg	+ [[Thumbnail(gabepicturenew.jpg]]

Users/GabeKoulikov

GabeKoulikov — 2006-04-14 20:19:47

Upload of image gabepicturenew.jpg.

Users/GabeKoulikov

GabeKoulikov — 2006-04-14 20:15:23

e-mail change and new photo

Differences for Users/GabeKoulikov

Deletions are marked with - .	Additions are marked with +.
Line 1:	Line 1:
	+ + attachment:photo.jpg
Line 7:	Line 9:
- '''Contact:''' e-mail: [[MailTo(doubleg_public AT hotmail DOT com)]]	+ '''Contact:''' e-mail: [[MailTo(gabekoulikov AT gmail DOT com)]]

Users/GabeKoulikov

MichelleAccurso — 2005-11-15 22:01:08

Differences for Users/GabeKoulikov

Deletions are marked with - .	Additions are marked with +.
Line 7:	Line 7:
- '''Contact:''' e-mail: doubleg UNDERSCORE public AT hotmail DOT com, where ALL CAPS are replaced by their respective computer characters, and spaces deleted. (are those spam-bots really that sensitive?)	+ '''Contact:''' e-mail: [[MailTo(doubleg_public AT hotmail DOT com)]]

Users/GabeKoulikov

SteveDavison — 2005-11-15 21:52:18

Comment added.

Differences for Users/GabeKoulikov

Deletions are marked with - .	Additions are marked with +.
Line 30:	Line 30:
	+ ------ + ''2005-11-15 22:52:18'' [[nbsp]] Hi, Gabe. --["SteveDavison"]

Users/GabeKoulikov

GabeKoulikov — 2005-10-14 18:37:26

Thanks!

Differences for Users/GabeKoulikov

Deletions are marked with - .	Additions are marked with +.
Line 26:	Line 26:
	+ My deepest thanks to everyone who has ever helped me since I started exploring Davis. +

Users/GabeKoulikov

GabeKoulikov — 2005-09-20 19:16:55

Finally, the long awaited "explanation/update": Looking Ahead

Differences for Users/GabeKoulikov

Deletions are marked with - .	Additions are marked with +.
Line 19:	Line 19:
	+ '''Looking Ahead''' (from my previous two years at UCD, etc.): + I seem to have skipped several necessary steps in my lifes journey in an attempt to keep up with where I wanted to go, and had to learn the hard way how essential some of those steps were. I sincerely apologize if I stepped on any toes (or faces, or whatever), and whatever else I may have done, or failed to do. We will now see how this step-by-step approach goes. If anyone would like to contact me during this time, you know how. I would appreciate your input. +
Line 23:	Line 26:
- Update coming soon on my new approach at Davis ("testing the hypothesis," and a revamp of my approach to life) by the end of June, for all interested. - --Revision: Since I didn't manage to update by "end of June," I'll add some stuff while I'm on my "vacation" over the next week or four. -

Users/GabeKoulikov

GabeKoulikov — 2005-07-26 16:35:38

Differences for Users/GabeKoulikov

Deletions are marked with - .	Additions are marked with +.
Line 6:	Line 6:
	+ + '''Contact:''' e-mail: doubleg UNDERSCORE public AT hotmail DOT com, where ALL CAPS are replaced by their respective computer characters, and spaces deleted. (are those spam-bots really that sensitive?)
Line 22:	Line 24:
- --Revision: Since I didn't manage to update by "end of June," I'll add some stuff while I'm on my "vacation" over the next week or two.	+ --Revision: Since I didn't manage to update by "end of June," I'll add some stuff while I'm on my "vacation" over the next week or four.

Users/GabeKoulikov

GabeKoulikov — 2005-07-13 15:26:24

Update and picture

Differences for Users/GabeKoulikov

Deletions are marked with - .	Additions are marked with +.
Line 1:	Line 1:
- [[Thumbnail(personpicture.jpg)]]	+ [[Thumbnail(gabepicture.jpg)]]
Line 3:	Line 3:
- '''Name:''' Gabe Koulikov, ["UC Davis" UCD] ["Undergraduate Students" undergrad]. - - '''Phone Number:''' Ask him.	+ '''Name:''' Gabriel Koulikov, ["UC Davis" UCD] ["Undergraduate Students" undergrad].
Line 11:	Line 9:
- '''One word description:''' Science.	+ '''One word self-description:''' Science.
Line 15:	Line 13:
- '''Origin:''' Born and raised in the Greater Sacramento Area (moved from an ethnic Russian neighborhood in Bryte/["West Sacramento" West Sac] to the land of chicken crossings and toilet races, a.k.a. Fair Oaks, at age 6). Transfer Student from ["American River College"] in Sacramento (moved to ["Davis"] at age 20).	+ '''Origin:''' Born and raised in the Greater Sacramento Area (moved from a Russian ethnic neighborhood in Bryte/["West Sacramento" West Sac] to the land of chicken crossings and toilet races, a.k.a. [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fair_Oaks%2C_California Fair Oaks], at age 6). Transfer Student from ["American River College"] in Sacramento (moved to ["Davis"] at age 20).

Users/GabeKoulikov

GabeKoulikov — 2005-07-13 14:44:30

Upload of image gabepicture.jpg.

Users/GabeKoulikov

GabeKoulikov — 2005-07-06 19:36:14

Update

Differences for Users/GabeKoulikov

Deletions are marked with - .	Additions are marked with +.
Line 24:	Line 24:
	+ --Revision: Since I didn't manage to update by "end of June," I'll add some stuff while I'm on my "vacation" over the next week or two.
Line 26:	Line 27:
	+ [[Comments]]

Users/GabeKoulikov

GabeKoulikov — 2005-05-31 23:23:47

Added more/updated info

Differences for Users/GabeKoulikov

Deletions are marked with - .	Additions are marked with +.
Line 3:	Line 3:
- '''Name:''' Gabe Koulikov	+ '''Name:''' Gabe Koulikov, ["UC Davis" UCD] ["Undergraduate Students" undergrad].
Line 9:	Line 9:
- '''Personality:''' In short: like a confused little kid trying to make sense of the big world in the most hardcore way possible.	+ '''Personality:''' In short: like a confused little kid trying to make sense of the big world in the most hardcore way possible. His life motto is "always demand consistency," and everything else about his approach to life/beliefs can be derived from this motto, supposedly. + + '''One word description:''' Science. + + '''New Major:''' ["Science and Technology Studies"] (w00t! Finally an "academic excuse" for why I am in college!). + + '''Origin:''' Born and raised in the Greater Sacramento Area (moved from an ethnic Russian neighborhood in Bryte/["West Sacramento" West Sac] to the land of chicken crossings and toilet races, a.k.a. Fair Oaks, at age 6). Transfer Student from ["American River College"] in Sacramento (moved to ["Davis"] at age 20). + + '''Ongoing Research Project:''' Interdisciplinary Science Activism (ISA).
Line 13:	Line 21:
	+ I'm thinking about what parts of my page should be in first person, or in third person. Why do some choose first vs. third person on their wiki pages? + + Update coming soon on my new approach at Davis ("testing the hypothesis," and a revamp of my approach to life) by the end of June, for all interested. +

Users/GabeKoulikov

GabeKoulikov — 2005-05-06 13:04:46

Differences for Users/GabeKoulikov

Deletions are marked with - .	Additions are marked with +.
Line 12:	Line 12:
	+ + [[Stats(GabeKoulikov)]]

Users/GabeKoulikov

GabeKoulikov — 2005-05-05 12:39:49

Differences for Users/GabeKoulikov

Deletions are marked with - .	Additions are marked with +.
Line 1:	Line 1:
	+ [[Thumbnail(personpicture.jpg)]] + + '''Name:''' Gabe Koulikov + + '''Phone Number:''' Ask him. + + '''Office:''' I plan to have "office hours" where anyone can talk with me in my self-disciplined schedule. + + '''Personality:''' In short: like a confused little kid trying to make sense of the big world in the most hardcore way possible. + + Gabe plans to use this page as the hub of his internet presence (i.e. all info online concerning him), once he has time in his schedule and disciplines himself to tackle it.