Recent Changes for "Users/GregKuperberg" - Davis Wiki

Users/GregKuperberg

GregKuperberg — 2008-12-14 20:52:38

Comment added.

Differences for Users/GregKuperberg

Deletions are marked with - .	Additions are marked with +.
Line 48:	Line 48:
	+ ------ + ''2008-12-14 20:52:38'' [[nbsp]] I don't feel strongly about "January 7, 1980" versus "7 January 1980". My suggestion is the former because (1) it's easier for me to read, not entirely sure why; and (2) it's a standard (not necessarily the standard) for Wikipedia biographies, at least for biographies of Americans. The format "1980-01-07" is really significantly more difficult to read and I don't see that it makes sense in the main text, even though it isn't too bad in the comments section. + + What I do care about rather more is to have a shorter title for each entry in Tragic Events. But maybe we're all in agreement on that one. + --["Users/GregKuperberg"]

Users/GregKuperberg

JabberWokky — 2008-12-14 19:18:08

Tossing another hat in.

Differences for Users/GregKuperberg

Deletions are marked with - .	Additions are marked with +.
Line 47:	Line 47:
	+ * Just to toss it out, a common date form used on the wiki is the [wiki:wikipedia:"ISO 8601" International Standard Date], or greatest to least: 2008-12-14. You'll note all comments are stamped with them. There are several benefits (unambiguity, as there is no common Y-d-m use, sortability, accepted standard, ability to drop or increase precision, a la 2008-12), but the classic drawback is like that of metric units -- it is less common than the classic form. It does appear to be gaining popularity as we have increasingly international communication. --["Users/JabberWokky" Evan 'JabberWokky' Edwards]

Users/GregKuperberg

DavidRobinson — 2008-12-14 18:58:50

Comment added.

Differences for Users/GregKuperberg

Deletions are marked with - .	Additions are marked with +.
Line 45:	Line 45:
	+ ------ + ''2008-12-14 18:58:50'' [[nbsp]] Greg, Although civil dates in this country are given in the form of month, day, and year, the genealogical convention is to go from the smallest increment to the largest--day, month, and year. That is the style accepted by the NEHGS and the NGS. I didn't change any event dates on the Tragic Events page from the conventional format, since that's what most people expect and are used to, just the birth and death dates. I take it you found that problematical? --["Users/DavidRobinson"]

Users/GregKuperberg

DavidRobinson — 2008-12-14 13:01:12

Comment added.

Differences for Users/GregKuperberg

Deletions are marked with - .	Additions are marked with +.
Line 43:	Line 43:
	+ ------ + ''2008-12-14 13:01:12'' [[nbsp]] Greg, I saw your comment on Tragic Events and agree about the short forms versus full names. When I start playing with the page again, I'll adjust as needed. --["Users/DavidRobinson"]

Users/GregKuperberg

IDoNotExist — 2008-12-14 12:26:13

Comment added.

Differences for Users/GregKuperberg

Deletions are marked with - .	Additions are marked with +.
Line 41:	Line 41:
	+ ------ + ''2008-12-14 12:26:13'' [[nbsp]] The formatting on the tragic events page is rather hard to read at the moment. Maybe the descriptions could be indented? --["Users/IDoNotExist"]

Users/GregKuperberg

JabberWokky — 2008-12-06 15:55:37

Differences for Users/GregKuperberg

Deletions are marked with - .	Additions are marked with +.
Line 38:	Line 38:
- * 1) Yes. 2) There's a different ebb and flow with Wiki Spot than with MediaWiki. Sort of like how the conventions and traditions between Wikipedia and Davis Wiki are radically different (primary sources are encouraged, well written creative writing is celebrated, POV is aggregated, not neutral etc). One of the things that dwiki gnomes tend to do is sit on ["Recent Changes"] and watch to assist and expand new topics. Personally, I don't care much about the Preview thing, but I know others do, and that's why. If you always edited with quick edits every day from now on, that would fine by me... it just bugs some editors. It really isn't that big a deal[[Footnote(Disclaimer: The size of the deal may vary by editor, I am not responsible if somebody else considers it a big deal)]]. I ''can'' attest that I'm waiting until you're completely finished (at least for awhile) with the edits on Tragic Events so I can go back and see what you did. --jw	+ * 1) Yes. 2) There's a different ebb and flow with Wiki Spot than with MediaWiki. Sort of like how the conventions and traditions between Wikipedia and Davis Wiki are radically different (primary sources are encouraged, well written creative writing is celebrated, POV is aggregated, not neutral etc). One of the things that dwiki gnomes tend to do is sit on ["Recent Changes"] and watch to assist and expand new topics. Personally, I don't care much about the Preview thing, but I know others do, and that's why. If you always edited with quick edits every day from now on, that would fine by me... it just bugs some editors. It really isn't that big a deal[[Footnote(Disclaimer: The size of the deal may vary by editor, I am not responsible if somebody else considers it a big deal)]]. I ''can'' attest that I'm waiting until you're completely finished (at least for awhile) with the edits on Tragic Events so I can go back and see what you did. --jw

Users/GregKuperberg

JabberWokky — 2008-12-06 15:55:19

Bit more positive, since the practical stuff seems a bit negative.

Differences for Users/GregKuperberg

Deletions are marked with - .	Additions are marked with +.
Line 33:	Line 33:
- ''2008-12-06 15:34:43'' [[nbsp]] msg here (please wait... editing) --["Users/JabberWokky"] - ------
Line 40:	Line 38:
	+ * 1) Yes. 2) There's a different ebb and flow with Wiki Spot than with MediaWiki. Sort of like how the conventions and traditions between Wikipedia and Davis Wiki are radically different (primary sources are encouraged, well written creative writing is celebrated, POV is aggregated, not neutral etc). One of the things that dwiki gnomes tend to do is sit on ["Recent Changes"] and watch to assist and expand new topics. Personally, I don't care much about the Preview thing, but I know others do, and that's why. If you always edited with quick edits every day from now on, that would fine by me... it just bugs some editors. It really isn't that big a deal[[Footnote(Disclaimer: The size of the deal may vary by editor, I am not responsible if somebody else considers it a big deal)]]. I ''can'' attest that I'm waiting until you're completely finished (at least for awhile) with the edits on Tragic Events so I can go back and see what you did. --jw + ----- + ''2008-12-06 15:34:43'' [[nbsp]] By the way, don't feel anybody is picking on you or telling you you're wrong. We're just trying to work with you. Y'know -- the whole "editors working together". The wiki has various tools and traditions that have evolved over the years. Now that you're editing so much (which is appreciated!), you're just now part of the incessant editor back and forth. Looking back on the comments you have gotten, I just didn't want you thinking everybody is being down on you. The comments you've gotten are intended to be practical feedback about how things have worked out and how most other editors work together. So don't feel shy about explaining your rationale or asking "why do people do it this way?". Often (like with the ["Wanted Pages"] entry), there are wiki tools that have shaped how people edit so that other editors can collaborate with them. We're all just working together. Once again, thanks for jumping in with all the editing! --["Users/JabberWokky" Evan 'JabberWokky' Edwards]

Users/GregKuperberg

WilliamLewis — 2008-12-06 15:46:40

(quick edit)

Differences for Users/GregKuperberg

Deletions are marked with - .	Additions are marked with +.
Line 39:	Line 39:
	+ * We've been bugging ["Users/PhilipNeustrom"] for a comment bar for quick edits since the feature came out. I think it is part of his conspiracy to get more coders onboard [wiki:sycamore Project Sycamore]. He might just figure we might want it so badly that someone will break down and write the patch. --["wl"]

Users/GregKuperberg

GregKuperberg — 2008-12-06 15:41:36

Comment added.

Differences for Users/GregKuperberg

Deletions are marked with - .	Additions are marked with +.
Line 34:	Line 34:
	+ ------ + ''2008-12-06 15:41:36'' [[nbsp]] 1) If you remove the last dead link to something, does it then disappear from the wanted page? + + 2) I would be quite happy to preview and even happier to notate some of my changes. But this is really more difficult to do in the WikiSpot software than it is in MediaWiki. Although even then, I'm never going to be all that great with these practices, because I have an ingrained habit of fiddling with text. + --["Users/GregKuperberg"]

Users/GregKuperberg

JabberWokky — 2008-12-06 15:34:43

Comment added.

Differences for Users/GregKuperberg

Deletions are marked with - .	Additions are marked with +.
Line 32:	Line 32:
	+ ------ + ''2008-12-06 15:34:43'' [[nbsp]] msg here (please wait... editing) --["Users/JabberWokky"]

Users/GregKuperberg

JabberWokky — 2008-12-06 15:26:37

Differences for Users/GregKuperberg

Deletions are marked with - .	Additions are marked with +.
Line 31:	Line 31:
	+ * Creating dead links adds the subject to ["Wanted Pages"], where editors can go to find things to write about. The problem that Jason is talking about regarding preview is that lots of quick edits makes it very difficult for others to review your edits and see what you have done. It's up to you, of course, and editing is preferable to not editing... it's just that it fills up the ["Recent Changes"] entry with loads of little changes that are hard to follow. --["Users/JabberWokky" Evan 'JabberWokky' Edwards]

Users/GregKuperberg

GregKuperberg — 2008-12-06 15:13:32

Comment added.

Differences for Users/GregKuperberg

Deletions are marked with - .	Additions are marked with +.
Line 26:	Line 26:
	+ ------ + ''2008-12-06 15:13:32'' [[nbsp]] Okay, capturing history is important. But a better system would be to use searches to see what to link when you make a new page, than to keep a lot of dead links. + + As for preview, the "quick edit" feature is much easier for me when I edit long pages. But it has no preview feature. + --["Users/GregKuperberg"]

Users/GregKuperberg

JabberWokky — 2008-12-06 15:00:00

Comment added.

Differences for Users/GregKuperberg

Deletions are marked with - .	Additions are marked with +.
Line 24:	Line 24:
	+ ------ + ''2008-12-06 15:00:00'' [[nbsp]] In general, the wiki is a resource about Davis, a town that includes many many years worth of people, places and things that no longer exist. Some editors are slowly working through adding historical entries devoted to things from decades (or just years) ago. There's plenty of room. --["Users/JabberWokky"]

Users/GregKuperberg

JasonAller — 2008-12-05 22:57:58

Comment added.

Differences for Users/GregKuperberg

Deletions are marked with - .	Additions are marked with +.
Line 22:	Line 22:
	+ ------ + ''2008-12-05 22:57:58'' [[nbsp]] Capturing history is important to some wiki users. Thus ["departed businesses"] and other pages like ["history"]. --["Users/JasonAller"]

Users/GregKuperberg

GregKuperberg — 2008-12-05 22:51:35

Comment added.

Differences for Users/GregKuperberg

Deletions are marked with - .	Additions are marked with +.
Line 19:	Line 19:
	+ ------ + ''2008-12-05 22:51:35'' [[nbsp]] Is it important to create a page for a bar that's been gone for five years? I'm not understanding this. + --["Users/GregKuperberg"]

Users/GregKuperberg

JasonAller — 2008-12-05 22:41:11

Comment added.

Differences for Users/GregKuperberg

Deletions are marked with - .	Additions are marked with +.
Line 17:	Line 17:
	+ ------ + ''2008-12-05 22:41:11'' [[nbsp]] The only reason the link was "dead" is that no one has yet created a page for the Paragon. There is an entire page devoted to listing all of the ["wanted pages"] on the wiki. --["Users/JasonAller"]

Users/GregKuperberg

GregKuperberg — 2008-12-05 22:04:11

Comment added.

Differences for Users/GregKuperberg

Deletions are marked with - .	Additions are marked with +.
Line 14:	Line 14:
	+ ------ + ''2008-12-05 22:04:11'' [[nbsp]] But the Paragon is a dead link and a dead establishment. + --["Users/GregKuperberg"]

Users/GregKuperberg

JasonAller — 2008-12-05 21:22:06

Comment added.

Differences for Users/GregKuperberg

Deletions are marked with - .	Additions are marked with +.
Line 12:	Line 12:
	+ ------ + ''2008-12-05 21:22:06'' [[nbsp]] Thanks for all of your recent edits. ["Please Remember to Preview"], and also to try to not remove links. The edit to ["Froggy's"] for example removed the link to ["The Paragon"]. --["Users/JasonAller"]

Users/GregKuperberg

JabberWokky — 2008-11-04 14:37:42

Differences for Users/GregKuperberg

Deletions are marked with - .	Additions are marked with +.
Line 11:	Line 11:
- ''2008-11-04 14:37:27'' [[nbsp]] There are a couple ways to fix it, but the best way would involve using the {{{[[Address()]]}}} macro so the points you're highlighting in the entry map automatically via Google Maps and the upcoming new mapping system. --["Users/JabberWokky"]	+ ''2008-11-04 14:37:27'' [[nbsp]] There are a couple ways to fix it, but the best way would involve using the {{{[[Address()]]}}} macro so the points you're highlighting in the entry map automatically via Google Maps and the upcoming new mapping system. --["Users/JabberWokky" Evan 'JabberWokky' Edwards]

Users/GregKuperberg

JabberWokky — 2008-11-04 14:37:27

Comment added.

Differences for Users/GregKuperberg

Deletions are marked with - .	Additions are marked with +.
Line 10:	Line 10:
	+ ------ + ''2008-11-04 14:37:27'' [[nbsp]] There are a couple ways to fix it, but the best way would involve using the {{{[[Address()]]}}} macro so the points you're highlighting in the entry map automatically via Google Maps and the upcoming new mapping system. --["Users/JabberWokky"]

Users/GregKuperberg

GregKuperberg — 2008-11-01 20:26:34

Comment added.

Differences for Users/GregKuperberg

Deletions are marked with - .	Additions are marked with +.
Line 8:	Line 8:
	+ ------ + ''2008-11-01 20:26:34'' [[nbsp]] I have a different recumbent now which is even more awesome. Anyway thanks for your interest. If you can help with the Bicycle Hazards page, that would be great. --["Users/GregKuperberg"]

Users/GregKuperberg

WilliamLewis — 2008-11-01 20:24:57

Comment added.

Differences for Users/GregKuperberg

Deletions are marked with - .	Additions are marked with +.
Line 6:	Line 6:
	+ ------ + ''2008-11-01 20:24:57'' [[nbsp]] I took MAT 21B from you in Winter 2006. It's nice to see you make such substantial contributions to the wiki. If I remember correctly, you had a really awesome recumbent. Still riding it? --["Users/WilliamLewis"]

Users/GregKuperberg

JasonAller — 2008-02-17 18:41:24

Wow, nice edit!

Differences for Users/GregKuperberg

Deletions are marked with - .	Additions are marked with +.
Line 1:	Line 1:
	+ Describe Users/GregKuperberg here. + + [[Comments]] + + ''2008-02-17 18:40:39'' [[nbsp]] ["Welcome to the Wiki"]. Wow, that was an impressive restructuring of ["Music Teachers"]. Thanks for the effort. --["Users/JasonAller"]