Recent Changes for "Users/WilyFerret" - Davis Wikihttp://daviswiki.org/Users/WilyFerretRecent Changes of the page "Users/WilyFerret" on Davis Wiki.en-us Users/WilyFerrethttp://daviswiki.org/Users/WilyFerret2008-03-10 13:32:31JabberWokky <div id="content" class="wikipage content"> Differences for Users/WilyFerret<p><strong></strong></p><table> <tr> <td> <span> Deletions are marked with - . </span> </td> <td> <span> Additions are marked with +. </span> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> Line 2: </td> <td> Line 2: </td> </tr> <tr> <td> </td> <td> <span>+ <br> + [[comments]]<br> + <br> + You might want to read the entry on ["Yolo County Health Department"]... those violations you accused the Co-op of are merely the ''example'' violations, not actual ones. --["Users/JabberWokky"]</span> </td> </tr> </table> </div> Users/WilyFerrethttp://daviswiki.org/Users/WilyFerret2007-10-25 19:54:08WilyFerret <div id="content" class="wikipage content"> Differences for Users/WilyFerret<p><strong></strong></p><table> <tr> <td> <span> Deletions are marked with - . </span> </td> <td> <span> Additions are marked with +. </span> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> Line 1: </td> <td> Line 1: </td> </tr> <tr> <td> <span>- WilyFerret [http://daviswiki.org/Delta_of_Venus?action=diff&amp;version2=204&amp;version1=203 claims] [http://daviswiki.org/Delta_of_Venus?action=diff&amp;version2=223&amp;version1=222 to be] ["Users/BrianElsasser"].<br> - <br> - [[Comments]]<br> - ------<br> - ''2007-10-16 09:38:42'' [[nbsp]] Howdy... the image you used for the Gorman Museum was from another site, which asked nicely that it not be used without permission. If you want to see if you can obtain permission, viewing the image gives you an email to query. --["Users/JabberWokky"]<br> - ------<br> - ''2007-10-16 10:53:59'' [[nbsp]] Brian/Wily, do you know that every edit you (and others) make is recorded and immediately and plainly visible to a large group of people?<br> - <br> - So, we see when you change the name on someone's comment, we see when you change the comment itself, we see when you make snarky negative comments about the Davis Food Co-op, and we see when you change "$500" to "$501" for no apparent reason.<br> - <br> - You're welcome and encouraged to make constructive edits (e.g. the Gorman Museum), but please don't try to use the wiki as your personal playground. It just creates more work for the rest of us to clean up after you. --["Users/Graham.Freeman"]<br> - ------<br> - ''2007-10-17 00:55:07'' [[nbsp]] I could be wrong, but my guess is that WF *wanted* all of us to see his edits, so we'd have to waste our time looking to see whether they needed to be reverted. I think he was pissed that I'd reverted his Delta of Venus deletion yet again. --["Users/CovertProfessor"]<br> - * Maybe. But, as I write below, I think his most recent Delta deletion was reasonable and shouldn't have been reverted. -Graham<br> - * Surely there are more constructive ways of handling his frustration, such as talking to an admin. I'm sure they'd rather sort the situation out than look at a bunch of pointless edits. --["Users/CovertProfessor"]<br> - ------<br> - ''2007-10-16 20:03:15'' [[nbsp]] I think it's reasonable - and a long-standing accepted wiki norm - for Wily/Brian to [http://daviswiki.org/Delta_of_Venus?action=diff&amp;version2=220&amp;version1=219 delete his own comment(s)] from the Delta of Venus page. I think it was inappropriate for CovertProfessor to [http://daviswiki.org/Delta_of_Venus?action=diff&amp;version2=221&amp;version1=220 revert that part of the change], although perhaps s/he wasn't aware that "Wily Ferret" is also "Brian Elsasser". (If so, s/he can easily be forgiven for not knowing, since Brian/Wily should use his real name.)<br> - <br> - Of course, if Eric Redpath then wants to delete his response because it's no longer relevant, that's reasonable too.<br> - <br> - In fact, I'd go so far as to say it's fair for Wily/Brian to delete his own comment and any responses to his comment (including Eric's), but reasonable people may disagree with that. --["Users/Graham.Freeman"]<br> - If WF is indeed BE, then I agree that he should be allowed to delete BE's comments. I don't see why he can't delete them as BE; I'm sure the admins can help him if he lost his password or whatever.<br> - That being said, if you look at the [http://daviswiki.org/Users/WilyFerret?action=recall&amp;version=9 history] of my exchanges with WF, you'll see a description of the original course of events: WF deletes BE's comments. No one notices/cares. Later, he tries to delete Redpath's. I object, mainly because it's someone else's comment, but also because I think that Redpath's comment says something important about the D of V. He insists that Redpath doesn't care if his comment is deleted, but somehow Redpath never shows up to do that. So, WF -- not me -- puts BE's comment back.<br> - Now here we are, months later, and WF is tries to delete the whole exchange (WF and Redpath) again. When I revert it, he changes BE to WF. I'm ok with that if BE is actually WF. Perhaps you know something I don't.<br> - --["Users/CovertProfessor"]<br> - ------<br> - ''2007-10-16 20:49:34'' [[nbsp]]<br> - <br> - So, here's where I stand:<br> - <br> - I'm convinced that all three identities are the same person. Take note of the common source IP ranges that [http://daviswiki.org/Users/WilyFerret?action=userinfo WilyFerret], [http://daviswiki.org/Users/BrianElsasser?action=userinfo BrianElsasser], and [http://daviswiki.org/Users/BrianKenyon?action=userinfo BrianKenyon] all post from.<br> - <br> - If I had more time and/or better tools to investigate, I'm sure that I'd uncover more wiki identities used by the same person. It's not OK in my opinion for this person to be playing identity games, but I'm not fighting that battle right now.<br> - <br> - As I stated above, I think it's reasonable for Wily/Brian/Brian/whatever he wants to call himself today to delete his own comment(s) from the Delta of Venus page. I think a reasonable person can argue that only Eric Redpath should delete Eric Redpath's response, though personally I think it's reasonable for someone to delete the response(s) to their own comments if they're simultaneously deleting the comment(s) in question.<br> - <br> - CovertProfessor is right that WilyFerret's wiki vandalism isn't constructive, and I'm not saying that the other counterproductive edits should stand. I'm just saying that the guy has the right to delete his own comments from the Delta of Venus page.<br> - <br> - And that's it for me on this topic.<br> - <br> - --["Users/Graham.Freeman"]</span> </td> <td> <span>+ WilyFerret</span> </td> </tr> </table> </div> Users/WilyFerrethttp://daviswiki.org/Users/WilyFerret2007-10-16 20:02:01Graham.Freemanminor <div id="content" class="wikipage content"> Differences for Users/WilyFerret<p><strong></strong></p><table> <tr> <td> <span> Deletions are marked with - . </span> </td> <td> <span> Additions are marked with +. </span> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> Line 35: </td> <td> Line 35: </td> </tr> <tr> <td> <span>- As I stated above, I think it's reasonable for Wily/Brian/Brian/GoofBall/BobDylan/whatever he wants to call himself today to delete his own comment(s) from the Delta of Venus page. I think a reasonable person can argue that only Eric Redpath should delete Eric Redpath's response, though personally I think it's reasonable for someone to delete the response(s) to their own comments if they're simultaneously deleting the comment(s) in question.</span> </td> <td> <span>+ As I stated above, I think it's reasonable for Wily/Brian/Brian/whatever he wants to call himself today to delete his own comment(s) from the Delta of Venus page. I think a reasonable person can argue that only Eric Redpath should delete Eric Redpath's response, though personally I think it's reasonable for someone to delete the response(s) to their own comments if they're simultaneously deleting the comment(s) in question.</span> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> Line 37: </td> <td> Line 37: </td> </tr> <tr> <td> <span>-</span> CovertProfessor is right that WilyFerret's wiki vandalism isn't constructive, <span>but</span> I'm not saying that the other counterproductive edits should stand. I'm just saying that the guy has the right to delete his own comments from the Delta of Venus page. </td> <td> <span>+</span> CovertProfessor is right that WilyFerret's wiki vandalism isn't constructive, <span>and</span> I'm not saying that the other counterproductive edits should stand. I'm just saying that the guy has the right to delete his own comments from the Delta of Venus page. </td> </tr> </table> </div> Users/WilyFerrethttp://daviswiki.org/Users/WilyFerret2007-10-16 19:56:52Graham.Freemanelaborating/rephrasing <div id="content" class="wikipage content"> Differences for Users/WilyFerret<p><strong></strong></p><table> <tr> <td> <span> Deletions are marked with - . </span> </td> <td> <span> Additions are marked with +. </span> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> Line 27: </td> <td> Line 27: </td> </tr> <tr> <td> <span>- ''2007-10-16 20:49:34'' [[nbsp]] With regard to whether Wily Ferret and Brian Elsasser are the same person, it appears from the common source IP ranges that [http://daviswiki.org/Users/WilyFerret?action=userinfo WilyFerret], [http://daviswiki.org/Users/BrianElsasser?action=userinfo BrianElsasser], and [http://daviswiki.org/Users/BrianKenyon?action=userinfo BrianKenyon] are the same person. --["Users/Graham.Freeman"]</span> </td> <td> <span>+ ''2007-10-16 20:49:34'' [[nbsp]]<br> + <br> + So, here's where I stand:<br> + <br> + I'm convinced that all three identities are the same person. Take note of the common source IP ranges that [http://daviswiki.org/Users/WilyFerret?action=userinfo WilyFerret], [http://daviswiki.org/Users/BrianElsasser?action=userinfo BrianElsasser], and [http://daviswiki.org/Users/BrianKenyon?action=userinfo BrianKenyon] all post from.<br> + <br> + If I had more time and/or better tools to investigate, I'm sure that I'd uncover more wiki identities used by the same person. It's not OK in my opinion for this person to be playing identity games, but I'm not fighting that battle right now.<br> + <br> + As I stated above, I think it's reasonable for Wily/Brian/Brian/GoofBall/BobDylan/whatever he wants to call himself today to delete his own comment(s) from the Delta of Venus page. I think a reasonable person can argue that only Eric Redpath should delete Eric Redpath's response, though personally I think it's reasonable for someone to delete the response(s) to their own comments if they're simultaneously deleting the comment(s) in question.<br> + <br> + CovertProfessor is right that WilyFerret's wiki vandalism isn't constructive, but I'm not saying that the other counterproductive edits should stand. I'm just saying that the guy has the right to delete his own comments from the Delta of Venus page.<br> + <br> + And that's it for me on this topic.<br> + <br> + --["Users/Graham.Freeman"]</span> </td> </tr> </table> </div> Users/WilyFerrethttp://daviswiki.org/Users/WilyFerret2007-10-16 19:49:34Graham.FreemanComment added. <div id="content" class="wikipage content"> Differences for Users/WilyFerret<p><strong></strong></p><table> <tr> <td> <span> Deletions are marked with - . </span> </td> <td> <span> Additions are marked with +. </span> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> Line 26: </td> <td> Line 26: </td> </tr> <tr> <td> </td> <td> <span>+ ------<br> + ''2007-10-16 20:49:34'' [[nbsp]] With regard to whether Wily Ferret and Brian Elsasser are the same person, it appears from the common source IP ranges that [http://daviswiki.org/Users/WilyFerret?action=userinfo WilyFerret], [http://daviswiki.org/Users/BrianElsasser?action=userinfo BrianElsasser], and [http://daviswiki.org/Users/BrianKenyon?action=userinfo BrianKenyon] are the same person. --["Users/Graham.Freeman"]</span> </td> </tr> </table> </div> Users/WilyFerrethttp://daviswiki.org/Users/WilyFerret2007-10-16 19:24:24CovertProfessorreply to GF <div id="content" class="wikipage content"> Differences for Users/WilyFerret<p><strong></strong></p><table> <tr> <td> <span> Deletions are marked with - . </span> </td> <td> <span> Additions are marked with +. </span> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> Line 14: </td> <td> Line 14: </td> </tr> <tr> <td> <span>- </span> * Maybe. But, as I write below, I think his most recent Delta deletion was reasonable and shouldn't have been reverted. -Graham </td> <td> <span>+</span> * Maybe. But, as I write below, I think his most recent Delta deletion was reasonable and shouldn't have been reverted. -Graham<span><br> + * Surely there are more constructive ways of handling his frustration, such as talking to an admin. I'm sure they'd rather sort the situation out than look at a bunch of pointless edits. --["Users/CovertProfessor"]</span> </td> </tr> </table> </div> Users/WilyFerrethttp://daviswiki.org/Users/WilyFerret2007-10-16 19:22:55CovertProfessorreply to Graham.Freeman <div id="content" class="wikipage content"> Differences for Users/WilyFerret<p><strong></strong></p><table> <tr> <td> <span> Deletions are marked with - . </span> </td> <td> <span> Additions are marked with +. </span> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> Line 21: </td> <td> Line 21: </td> </tr> <tr> <td> </td> <td> <span>+ If WF is indeed BE, then I agree that he should be allowed to delete BE's comments. I don't see why he can't delete them as BE; I'm sure the admins can help him if he lost his password or whatever.<br> + That being said, if you look at the [http://daviswiki.org/Users/WilyFerret?action=recall&amp;version=9 history] of my exchanges with WF, you'll see a description of the original course of events: WF deletes BE's comments. No one notices/cares. Later, he tries to delete Redpath's. I object, mainly because it's someone else's comment, but also because I think that Redpath's comment says something important about the D of V. He insists that Redpath doesn't care if his comment is deleted, but somehow Redpath never shows up to do that. So, WF -- not me -- puts BE's comment back.<br> + Now here we are, months later, and WF is tries to delete the whole exchange (WF and Redpath) again. When I revert it, he changes BE to WF. I'm ok with that if BE is actually WF. Perhaps you know something I don't.<br> + --["Users/CovertProfessor"]</span> </td> </tr> </table> </div> Users/WilyFerrethttp://daviswiki.org/Users/WilyFerret2007-10-16 19:11:09Graham.Freemanresponse to CP <div id="content" class="wikipage content"> Differences for Users/WilyFerret<p><strong></strong></p><table> <tr> <td> <span> Deletions are marked with - . </span> </td> <td> <span> Additions are marked with +. </span> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> Line 14: </td> <td> Line 14: </td> </tr> <tr> <td> </td> <td> <span>+ * Maybe. But, as I write below, I think his most recent Delta deletion was reasonable and shouldn't have been reverted. -Graham</span> </td> </tr> </table> </div> Users/WilyFerrethttp://daviswiki.org/Users/WilyFerret2007-10-16 19:08:29Graham.Freemanmoving Covert Professor's comments to the appropriate page <div id="content" class="wikipage content"> Differences for Users/WilyFerret<p><strong></strong></p><table> <tr> <td> <span> Deletions are marked with - . </span> </td> <td> <span> Additions are marked with +. </span> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> Line 13: </td> <td> Line 13: </td> </tr> <tr> <td> </td> <td> <span>+ ''2007-10-17 00:55:07'' [[nbsp]] I could be wrong, but my guess is that WF *wanted* all of us to see his edits, so we'd have to waste our time looking to see whether they needed to be reverted. I think he was pissed that I'd reverted his Delta of Venus deletion yet again. --["Users/CovertProfessor"]<br> + ------</span> </td> </tr> </table> </div> Users/WilyFerrethttp://daviswiki.org/Users/WilyFerret2007-10-16 19:06:06Graham.Freemanrealized I don't know Covert Professor's gender; links <div id="content" class="wikipage content"> Differences for Users/WilyFerret<p><strong></strong></p><table> <tr> <td> <span> Deletions are marked with - . </span> </td> <td> <span> Additions are marked with +. </span> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> Line 13: </td> <td> Line 13: </td> </tr> <tr> <td> <span>-</span> ''2007-10-16 20:03:15'' [[nbsp]] I think it's reasonable - and a long-standing accepted wiki norm - for Wily/Brian to delete his own comment(s) from the Delta of Venus page. I think it was inappropriate for CovertProfessor to <span>revert that part of the change</span>.<span>&nbsp;&nbsp;And</span>, <span>if</span> Eric Redpath then wants to delete his response because it's no longer relevant, that's reasonable too. </td> <td> <span>+</span> ''2007-10-16 20:03:15'' [[nbsp]] I think it's reasonable - and a long-standing accepted wiki norm - for Wily/Brian to <span>[http://daviswiki.org/Delta_of_Venus?action=diff&amp;version2=220&amp;version1=219 </span>delete his own comment(s)<span>]</span> from the Delta of Venus page. I think it was inappropriate for CovertProfessor to <span>[http://daviswiki</span>.<span>org/Delta_of_Venus?action=diff&amp;version2=221&amp;version1=220 revert that part of the change]</span>, <span>although perhaps s/he wasn't aware that "Wily Ferret" is also "Brian</span> E<span>lsasser". (If so, s/he can easily be forgiven for not knowing, since Brian/Wily should use his real name.)<br> + <br> + Of course, if E</span>ric Redpath then wants to delete his response because it's no longer relevant, that's reasonable too. </td> </tr> </table> </div> Users/WilyFerrethttp://daviswiki.org/Users/WilyFerret2007-10-16 19:03:15Graham.FreemanComment added. <div id="content" class="wikipage content"> Differences for Users/WilyFerret<p><strong></strong></p><table> <tr> <td> <span> Deletions are marked with - . </span> </td> <td> <span> Additions are marked with +. </span> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> Line 12: </td> <td> Line 12: </td> </tr> <tr> <td> </td> <td> <span>+ ------<br> + ''2007-10-16 20:03:15'' [[nbsp]] I think it's reasonable - and a long-standing accepted wiki norm - for Wily/Brian to delete his own comment(s) from the Delta of Venus page. I think it was inappropriate for CovertProfessor to revert that part of the change. And, if Eric Redpath then wants to delete his response because it's no longer relevant, that's reasonable too.<br> + <br> + In fact, I'd go so far as to say it's fair for Wily/Brian to delete his own comment and any responses to his comment (including Eric's), but reasonable people may disagree with that. --["Users/Graham.Freeman"]</span> </td> </tr> </table> </div> Users/WilyFerrethttp://daviswiki.org/Users/WilyFerret2007-10-16 18:02:16JasonAller <div id="content" class="wikipage content"> Differences for Users/WilyFerret<p><strong></strong></p><table> <tr> <td> <span> Deletions are marked with - . </span> </td> <td> <span> Additions are marked with +. </span> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> Line 1: </td> <td> Line 1: </td> </tr> <tr> <td> <span>-</span> WilyFerret [http://daviswiki.org/Delta_of_Venus?action=diff&amp;version2=204&amp;version1=203 claims] [http://daviswiki.org/Delta_of_Venus?action=diff&amp;version2=223&amp;version1=222 to be] ["BrianElsasser"]. </td> <td> <span>+</span> WilyFerret [http://daviswiki.org/Delta_of_Venus?action=diff&amp;version2=204&amp;version1=203 claims] [http://daviswiki.org/Delta_of_Venus?action=diff&amp;version2=223&amp;version1=222 to be] ["<span>Users/</span>BrianElsasser"]. </td> </tr> </table> </div> Users/WilyFerrethttp://daviswiki.org/Users/WilyFerret2007-10-16 17:07:41CovertProfessorIs WF really BE? <div id="content" class="wikipage content"> Differences for Users/WilyFerret<p><strong></strong></p><table> <tr> <td> <span> Deletions are marked with - . </span> </td> <td> <span> Additions are marked with +. </span> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> Line 1: </td> <td> Line 1: </td> </tr> <tr> <td> </td> <td> <span>+ WilyFerret [http://daviswiki.org/Delta_of_Venus?action=diff&amp;version2=204&amp;version1=203 claims] [http://daviswiki.org/Delta_of_Venus?action=diff&amp;version2=223&amp;version1=222 to be] ["BrianElsasser"].<br> + </span> </td> </tr> </table> </div> Users/WilyFerrethttp://daviswiki.org/Users/WilyFerret2007-10-16 09:53:59Graham.FreemanComment added. <div id="content" class="wikipage content"> Differences for Users/WilyFerret<p><strong></strong></p><table> <tr> <td> <span> Deletions are marked with - . </span> </td> <td> <span> Additions are marked with +. </span> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> Line 4: </td> <td> Line 4: </td> </tr> <tr> <td> </td> <td> <span>+ ------<br> + ''2007-10-16 10:53:59'' [[nbsp]] Brian/Wily, do you know that every edit you (and others) make is recorded and immediately and plainly visible to a large group of people?<br> + <br> + So, we see when you change the name on someone's comment, we see when you change the comment itself, we see when you make snarky negative comments about the Davis Food Co-op, and we see when you change "$500" to "$501" for no apparent reason.<br> + <br> + You're welcome and encouraged to make constructive edits (e.g. the Gorman Museum), but please don't try to use the wiki as your personal playground. It just creates more work for the rest of us to clean up after you. --["Users/Graham.Freeman"]</span> </td> </tr> </table> </div> Users/WilyFerrethttp://daviswiki.org/Users/WilyFerret2007-10-16 08:38:42JabberWokkyComment added. <div id="content" class="wikipage content"> Differences for Users/WilyFerret<p><strong></strong></p><table> <tr> <td> <span> Deletions are marked with - . </span> </td> <td> <span> Additions are marked with +. </span> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> Line 2: </td> <td> Line 2: </td> </tr> <tr> <td> </td> <td> <span>+ ------<br> + ''2007-10-16 09:38:42'' [[nbsp]] Howdy... the image you used for the Gorman Museum was from another site, which asked nicely that it not be used without permission. If you want to see if you can obtain permission, viewing the image gives you an email to query. --["Users/JabberWokky"]</span> </td> </tr> </table> </div> Users/WilyFerrethttp://daviswiki.org/Users/WilyFerret2007-08-31 23:13:30WilyFerret <div id="content" class="wikipage content"> Differences for Users/WilyFerret<p><strong></strong></p><table> <tr> <td> <span> Deletions are marked with - . </span> </td> <td> <span> Additions are marked with +. </span> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> Line 2: </td> <td> Line 2: </td> </tr> <tr> <td> <span>- ------<br> - ''2007-08-05 01:16:33'' [[nbsp]] Brian, why did you [http://daviswiki.org/Delta_of_Venus?action=diff&amp;version2=182&amp;version1=181 vandalize] the Delta of Venus page? --["Users/Graham.Freeman"]<br> - ------<br> - ''2007-08-14 22:18:57'' [[nbsp]] Stop deleting stuff. Please.<br> - --["Users/WilliamLewis"]<br> - ------<br> - ''2007-08-15 01:19:16'' [[nbsp]] its ok to mock a comment. But how about modifying the comment and pasting it below the original comment (leaving the original comment as is) and saying something to the effect of the comment should have read like this...Then when you are done sign your name. Deleting comments serves no good. --["Users/MattHh"]<br> - ------<br> - Including this comment from the ["Delta of Venus"] page for reference: ''2006-05-26 04:09:56'' [[nbsp]] ''BrianElsasser's comment is hilarious. sorry we (the delta staff) are too busy to entertain you... wah wah wah. and if you thought we were EVER interesting or witty, i apologize for letting our standards slip. we usually have a pretty intense screening process for potential employees (do you have tattoos? what's your record collection like? how rudely can you throw away a customers newspaper? have you traveled extensively in thailand? etc.) as far as this mysterious manager (me i hope)? i think we find enough time to slack off just fine. corporate fast-food scene??! --["EricRedpath"]''<br> - * Manalive, the entry keeps coming back to haunt me like a bad penny. If I delete it, why does it keep coming back. I thought anyone could edit Davis Wikie...BrianElsasser...I will let this stand for 24 hours and then delete it, hopefully permanently...!<br> - * The comment keeps coming back because people "undelete" (revert) it. It appears as though you (["Users/WilyFerret"]) are trying to delete someone else's comment, and generally, that's not considered acceptable. If there's some reason you think it must be deleted, then say so (you never leave a reason for your deletions). -- ["Users/CovertProfessor"]<br> - * I am Brian Elsasser. The above comment I keep trying to delete, since I discovered it had been undeleted is a response to a comment of my own that I deleted months ago. In other words, Redpath's comment responds to nothing now. Do I have to resub what I wrote originally, which doesn't even really matter now, or will you all let me just get rid of the unpleasantness here altogether...? Redpath doesn't care, it's somebody else who keeps resurrecting the bad vibe...<br> - * If Redpath doesn't care, then why not ask ''him'' to delete it? Otherwise, why have you not only tried to delete this comment, but also vandalized it, as the link from GF above shows? That doesn't seem like someone who is trying to move on from unpleasantness. --["Users/CovertProfessor"]</span> </td> <td> </td> </tr> </table> </div> Users/WilyFerrethttp://daviswiki.org/Users/WilyFerret2007-08-15 21:02:41CovertProfessorclarifying <div id="content" class="wikipage content"> Differences for Users/WilyFerret<p><strong></strong></p><table> <tr> <td> <span> Deletions are marked with - . </span> </td> <td> <span> Additions are marked with +. </span> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> Line 10: </td> <td> Line 10: </td> </tr> <tr> <td> <span>-</span> Including this comment for reference: ''2006-05-26 04:09:56'' [[nbsp]] ''BrianElsasser's comment is hilarious. sorry we (the delta staff) are too busy to entertain you... wah wah wah. and if you thought we were EVER interesting or witty, i apologize for letting our standards slip. we usually have a pretty intense screening process for potential employees (do you have tattoos? what's your record collection like? how rudely can you throw away a customers newspaper? have you traveled extensively in thailand? etc.) as far as this mysterious manager (me i hope)? i think we find enough time to slack off just fine. corporate fast-food scene??! --["EricRedpath"]'' </td> <td> <span>+</span> Including this comment<span>&nbsp;from the ["Delta of Venus"] page</span> for reference: ''2006-05-26 04:09:56'' [[nbsp]] ''BrianElsasser's comment is hilarious. sorry we (the delta staff) are too busy to entertain you... wah wah wah. and if you thought we were EVER interesting or witty, i apologize for letting our standards slip. we usually have a pretty intense screening process for potential employees (do you have tattoos? what's your record collection like? how rudely can you throw away a customers newspaper? have you traveled extensively in thailand? etc.) as far as this mysterious manager (me i hope)? i think we find enough time to slack off just fine. corporate fast-food scene??! --["EricRedpath"]'' </td> </tr> </table> </div> Users/WilyFerrethttp://daviswiki.org/Users/WilyFerret2007-08-15 21:01:15CovertProfessorfixing style <div id="content" class="wikipage content"> Differences for Users/WilyFerret<p><strong></strong></p><table> <tr> <td> <span> Deletions are marked with - . </span> </td> <td> <span> Additions are marked with +. </span> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> Line 10: </td> <td> Line 10: </td> </tr> <tr> <td> <span>- ''</span>''2006-05-26 04:09:56'' [[nbsp]] BrianElsasser's comment is hilarious. sorry we (the delta staff) are too busy to entertain you... wah wah wah. and if you thought we were EVER interesting or witty, i apologize for letting our standards slip. we usually have a pretty intense screening process for potential employees (do you have tattoos? what's your record collection like? how rudely can you throw away a customers newspaper? have you traveled extensively in thailand? etc.) as far as this mysterious manager (me i hope)? i think we find enough time to slack off just fine. corporate fast-food scene??! --["EricRedpath"]'' </td> <td> <span>+ Including this comment for reference: </span>''2006-05-26 04:09:56'' [[nbsp]] <span>''</span>BrianElsasser's comment is hilarious. sorry we (the delta staff) are too busy to entertain you... wah wah wah. and if you thought we were EVER interesting or witty, i apologize for letting our standards slip. we usually have a pretty intense screening process for potential employees (do you have tattoos? what's your record collection like? how rudely can you throw away a customers newspaper? have you traveled extensively in thailand? etc.) as far as this mysterious manager (me i hope)? i think we find enough time to slack off just fine. corporate fast-food scene??! --["EricRedpath"]'' </td> </tr> </table> </div> Users/WilyFerrethttp://daviswiki.org/Users/WilyFerret2007-08-15 21:00:09CovertProfessorreply to WilyFerrett <div id="content" class="wikipage content"> Differences for Users/WilyFerret<p><strong></strong></p><table> <tr> <td> <span> Deletions are marked with - . </span> </td> <td> <span> Additions are marked with +. </span> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> Line 9: </td> <td> Line 9: </td> </tr> <tr> <td> </td> <td> <span>+ ------<br> + ''''2006-05-26 04:09:56'' [[nbsp]] BrianElsasser's comment is hilarious. sorry we (the delta staff) are too busy to entertain you... wah wah wah. and if you thought we were EVER interesting or witty, i apologize for letting our standards slip. we usually have a pretty intense screening process for potential employees (do you have tattoos? what's your record collection like? how rudely can you throw away a customers newspaper? have you traveled extensively in thailand? etc.) as far as this mysterious manager (me i hope)? i think we find enough time to slack off just fine. corporate fast-food scene??! --["EricRedpath"]''<br> + * Manalive, the entry keeps coming back to haunt me like a bad penny. If I delete it, why does it keep coming back. I thought anyone could edit Davis Wikie...BrianElsasser...I will let this stand for 24 hours and then delete it, hopefully permanently...!<br> + * The comment keeps coming back because people "undelete" (revert) it. It appears as though you (["Users/WilyFerret"]) are trying to delete someone else's comment, and generally, that's not considered acceptable. If there's some reason you think it must be deleted, then say so (you never leave a reason for your deletions). -- ["Users/CovertProfessor"]<br> + * I am Brian Elsasser. The above comment I keep trying to delete, since I discovered it had been undeleted is a response to a comment of my own that I deleted months ago. In other words, Redpath's comment responds to nothing now. Do I have to resub what I wrote originally, which doesn't even really matter now, or will you all let me just get rid of the unpleasantness here altogether...? Redpath doesn't care, it's somebody else who keeps resurrecting the bad vibe...<br> + * If Redpath doesn't care, then why not ask ''him'' to delete it? Otherwise, why have you not only tried to delete this comment, but also vandalized it, as the link from GF above shows? That doesn't seem like someone who is trying to move on from unpleasantness. --["Users/CovertProfessor"]</span> </td> </tr> </table> </div> Users/WilyFerrethttp://daviswiki.org/Users/WilyFerret2007-08-15 00:19:16MattHhComment added. <div id="content" class="wikipage content"> Differences for Users/WilyFerret<p><strong></strong></p><table> <tr> <td> <span> Deletions are marked with - . </span> </td> <td> <span> Additions are marked with +. </span> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> Line 7: </td> <td> Line 7: </td> </tr> <tr> <td> </td> <td> <span>+ ------<br> + ''2007-08-15 01:19:16'' [[nbsp]] its ok to mock a comment. But how about modifying the comment and pasting it below the original comment (leaving the original comment as is) and saying something to the effect of the comment should have read like this...Then when you are done sign your name. Deleting comments serves no good. --["Users/MattHh"]</span> </td> </tr> </table> </div> Users/WilyFerrethttp://daviswiki.org/Users/WilyFerret2007-08-14 21:18:57WilliamLewisComment added. <div id="content" class="wikipage content"> Differences for Users/WilyFerret<p><strong></strong></p><table> <tr> <td> <span> Deletions are marked with - . </span> </td> <td> <span> Additions are marked with +. </span> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> Line 4: </td> <td> Line 4: </td> </tr> <tr> <td> </td> <td> <span>+ ------<br> + ''2007-08-14 22:18:57'' [[nbsp]] Stop deleting stuff. Please.<br> + --["Users/WilliamLewis"]</span> </td> </tr> </table> </div> Users/WilyFerrethttp://daviswiki.org/Users/WilyFerret2007-08-05 00:16:33Graham.FreemanComment added. <div id="content" class="wikipage content"> Differences for Users/WilyFerret<p><strong></strong></p><table> <tr> <td> <span> Deletions are marked with - . </span> </td> <td> <span> Additions are marked with +. </span> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> Line 2: </td> <td> Line 2: </td> </tr> <tr> <td> </td> <td> <span>+ ------<br> + ''2007-08-05 01:16:33'' [[nbsp]] Brian, why did you [http://daviswiki.org/Delta_of_Venus?action=diff&amp;version2=182&amp;version1=181 vandalize] the Delta of Venus page? --["Users/Graham.Freeman"]</span> </td> </tr> </table> </div> Users/WilyFerrethttp://daviswiki.org/Users/WilyFerret2007-08-05 00:14:19Graham.Freeman <div id="content" class="wikipage content"> Differences for Users/WilyFerret<p><strong></strong></p><table> <tr> <td> <span> Deletions are marked with - . </span> </td> <td> <span> Additions are marked with +. </span> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> Line 1: </td> <td> Line 1: </td> </tr> <tr> <td> <span>- deleted</span> </td> <td> <span>+ [[Comments]]</span> </td> </tr> </table> </div> Users/WilyFerrethttp://daviswiki.org/Users/WilyFerret2007-07-08 22:51:26PhilipNeustromPage deleted (no content) <div id="content" class="wikipage content"> Differences for Users/WilyFerret<p><strong></strong></p><table> <tr> <td> <span> Deletions are marked with - . </span> </td> <td> <span> Additions are marked with +. </span> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> Line 1: </td> <td> Line 1: </td> </tr> <tr> <td> <span>- [[Comments]]</span> </td> <td> <span>+ deleted</span> </td> </tr> </table> </div> Users/WilyFerrethttp://daviswiki.org/Users/WilyFerret2007-07-08 22:37:54JessicaRockwellcomment box added <div id="content" class="wikipage content"> Differences for Users/WilyFerret<p><strong></strong></p><table> <tr> <td> <span> Deletions are marked with - . </span> </td> <td> <span> Additions are marked with +. </span> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> Line 1: </td> <td> Line 1: </td> </tr> <tr> <td> </td> <td> <span>+ [[Comments]]</span> </td> </tr> </table> </div>