Recent Changes for "Users/jsogul" - Davis Wiki

Users/jsogul

MaxLucas — 2009-09-02 12:59:21

Comment added.

Differences for Users/jsogul

Deletions are marked with - .	Additions are marked with +.
Line 15:	Line 15:
	+ ------ + ''2009-09-02 13:59:21'' [[nbsp]] It was my mistake. I had assumed that the atm had been delivered. Cardtronics must be behind in their deliveries. Hopefully it will arrive soon. --["Users/MaxLucas"]

Users/jsogul

robinlaughlin — 2009-08-27 19:38:10

Comment added.

Differences for Users/jsogul

Deletions are marked with - .	Additions are marked with +.
Line 13:	Line 13:
	+ ------ + ''2009-08-27 20:38:10'' [[nbsp]] Good point about West Village/["West Davis"]. I'll change some of the wording I added...and of course as a fellow editor, you can further change it. --["Users/robinlaughlin"]

Users/jsogul

jsogul — 2009-08-27 14:21:23

Differences for Users/jsogul

Deletions are marked with - .	Additions are marked with +.
Line 12:	Line 12:
	+ * You're right. I never said there should be only one entry, though. --["Users/jsogul"]

Users/jsogul

StevenDaubert — 2009-08-27 10:38:08

Comment added.

Differences for Users/jsogul

Deletions are marked with - .	Additions are marked with +.
Line 10:	Line 10:
	+ ------ + ''2009-08-27 11:38:08'' [[nbsp]] it's my understanding the old location is still open serving pizza, I think two entries are required --["Users/StevenDaubert"]

Users/jsogul

MaxLucas — 2009-08-24 12:50:49

Comment added.

Differences for Users/jsogul

Deletions are marked with - .	Additions are marked with +.
Line 8:	Line 8:
	+ ------ + ''2009-08-24 13:50:49'' [[nbsp]] The atms were just installed and the website has not been updated. It could take months for the website to be updated. --["Users/MaxLucas"]

Users/jsogul

JasonAller — 2009-08-23 13:30:30

never mind, I see you found it. just a spelling issue?

Differences for Users/jsogul

Deletions are marked with - .	Additions are marked with +.
Line 8:	Line 8:
- ------ - ''2009-08-23 14:18:36'' [[nbsp]] looking for the ["Little Caesars Pizza"] page? --["Users/JasonAller"]

Users/jsogul

JasonAller — 2009-08-23 13:18:36

Comment added.

Differences for Users/jsogul

Deletions are marked with - .	Additions are marked with +.
Line 8:	Line 8:
	+ ------ + ''2009-08-23 14:18:36'' [[nbsp]] looking for the ["Little Caesars Pizza"] page? --["Users/JasonAller"]

Users/jsogul

PhilipNeustrom — 2009-08-13 18:07:16

Comment added.

Differences for Users/jsogul

Deletions are marked with - .	Additions are marked with +.
Line 6:	Line 6:
	+ ------ + ''2009-08-13 19:07:16'' [[nbsp]] I think it's very interesting to look at a list of past and present staff: ["The California Aggie Staff History"]. This is the only such list. --["Users/PhilipNeustrom"]

Users/jsogul

JasonAller — 2009-05-21 16:29:41

relinking as alternative to deleting otherwise empty page

Differences for Users/jsogul

Deletions are marked with - .	Additions are marked with +.
Line 1:	Line 1:
- Describe Users/jsogul here. - [[comments]]	+ ''This editor can edit this entry and tell us a bit about themselves by clicking the Edit icon.'' + + [[Comments]] + + ''2009-05-21 17:29:07'' [[nbsp]] Thanks for creating the page for ["Linda Katehi"]. --["Users/JasonAller"]

Users/jsogul

jsogul — 2009-04-30 08:27:56

Differences for Users/jsogul

Deletions are marked with - .	Additions are marked with +.
Line 3:	Line 3:
- ---------- - [http://daviswiki.org/UC_Davis?action=diff&version2=63&version1=59 How about this version]? It acknowledges that it is sometimes claimed, explains the rationale, and also calls it into question. --["Users/JabberWokky" jw] - ------ - ''2009-04-24 19:07:44'' [[nbsp]] Hmmm... how about splitting it out into a new paragraph that starts out with "There is a popular rumor", or something that that? I'm thinking along the lines that saying that there is a rumor and then knocking it down is better than just omitting all mention of it. --["Users/JabberWokky"] - ------ - ''2009-04-25 10:31:09'' [[nbsp]] Nice rewrite. Makes it clear there are people who think that, and also that there's no known evidence (and if somebody can find official documents, they can chime in). --["Users/JabberWokky"] - ------ - ''2009-04-25 19:01:26'' [[nbsp]] Where along the way should ["Users/RealComputers"] have been handled differently? If there is something that could have been done that would have resolved the situation better I think the entire wiki would be better off knowing about it. I can see a few moments that might have gone better, but if you look at [http://daviswiki.org/Users/RealComputers?action=userinfo his edit history] and the [http://daviswiki.org/Users/RealComputers?action=info history of people reaching out to him] I think the wiki collectively tried. Does the ["Welcome to the Wiki"] set of pages need more work? Should there be a don't undo during a new user's first hour, and only leave welcome messages on their page? How can the wiki handle this better the next time it comes up? --["Users/JasonAller"]

Users/jsogul

JasonAller — 2009-04-25 18:01:26

Comment added.

Differences for Users/jsogul

Deletions are marked with - .	Additions are marked with +.
Line 9:	Line 9:
	+ ------ + ''2009-04-25 19:01:26'' [[nbsp]] Where along the way should ["Users/RealComputers"] have been handled differently? If there is something that could have been done that would have resolved the situation better I think the entire wiki would be better off knowing about it. I can see a few moments that might have gone better, but if you look at [http://daviswiki.org/Users/RealComputers?action=userinfo his edit history] and the [http://daviswiki.org/Users/RealComputers?action=info history of people reaching out to him] I think the wiki collectively tried. Does the ["Welcome to the Wiki"] set of pages need more work? Should there be a don't undo during a new user's first hour, and only leave welcome messages on their page? How can the wiki handle this better the next time it comes up? --["Users/JasonAller"]

Users/jsogul

JabberWokky — 2009-04-25 09:31:09

Comment added.

Differences for Users/jsogul

Deletions are marked with - .	Additions are marked with +.
Line 7:	Line 7:
	+ ------ + ''2009-04-25 10:31:09'' [[nbsp]] Nice rewrite. Makes it clear there are people who think that, and also that there's no known evidence (and if somebody can find official documents, they can chime in). --["Users/JabberWokky"]

Users/jsogul

JabberWokky — 2009-04-24 18:07:44

Comment added.

Differences for Users/jsogul

Deletions are marked with - .	Additions are marked with +.
Line 5:	Line 5:
	+ ------ + ''2009-04-24 19:07:44'' [[nbsp]] Hmmm... how about splitting it out into a new paragraph that starts out with "There is a popular rumor", or something that that? I'm thinking along the lines that saying that there is a rumor and then knocking it down is better than just omitting all mention of it. --["Users/JabberWokky"]

Users/jsogul

JabberWokky — 2009-04-24 17:34:45

Differences for Users/jsogul

Deletions are marked with - .	Additions are marked with +.
Line 4:	Line 4:
- [http://daviswiki.org/UC_Davis?action=diff&version2=63&version1=59 How about this version]? It acknowledges that it is sometimes claimed explains the rationale, and also calls it into question. --["Users/JabberWokky" jw]	+ [http://daviswiki.org/UC_Davis?action=diff&version2=63&version1=59 How about this version]? It acknowledges that it is sometimes claimed, explains the rationale, and also calls it into question. --["Users/JabberWokky" jw]

Users/jsogul

JabberWokky — 2009-04-24 17:34:32

Differences for Users/jsogul

Deletions are marked with - .	Additions are marked with +.
Line 1:	Line 1:
	+ Describe Users/jsogul here. + [[comments]] + ---------- + [http://daviswiki.org/UC_Davis?action=diff&version2=63&version1=59 How about this version]? It acknowledges that it is sometimes claimed explains the rationale, and also calls it into question. --["Users/JabberWokky" jw]