Recent Changes for "Wiki Social Norms" - Davis Wikihttp://daviswiki.org/Wiki_Social_NormsRecent Changes of the page "Wiki Social Norms" on Davis Wiki.en-us Wiki Social Normshttp://daviswiki.org/Wiki_Social_Norms2013-12-21 19:50:47SugarmanSaulName again - if you want to revert again, please email sdsugarman@gmail.com! :) <div id="content" class="wikipage content"> Differences for Wiki Social Norms<p><strong></strong></p><table> <tr> <td> <span> Deletions are marked with - . </span> </td> <td> <span> Additions are marked with +. </span> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> Line 5: </td> <td> Line 5: </td> </tr> <tr> <td> <span>-</span> When SaulS<span>ugarman</span> first arrived, he was under the impression that objectivity is a goal, and started removing bias and opinions. Many editors didn't like this, and opinions and biases grew faster wherever Saul tried to remove them. Saul still has his opinion on objectivity, and as a member of the Wiki, has moved the site as a whole a bit toward objectivity, but he now recognizes that Davis Wiki operates a bit differently than his vision, and now adds useful entries.<br> <span>-</span> * ''Actually my views about the Wiki haven't really changed. I edit things for objectivity when I think they are unfairly or especially negatively biasing something. I also like people to own up to the things they say, and I don't think the info page is enough so I like to add comment attribution. The real difference is I have more of a life, less time, and honestly I feel in part because of me, there are less things I find that are as irritating.'' -- SaulS<span>ugarman</span> </td> <td> <span>+</span> When Saul<span>&nbsp;</span>S<span>.</span> first arrived, he was under the impression that objectivity is a goal, and started removing bias and opinions. Many editors didn't like this, and opinions and biases grew faster wherever Saul tried to remove them. Saul still has his opinion on objectivity, and as a member of the Wiki, has moved the site as a whole a bit toward objectivity, but he now recognizes that Davis Wiki operates a bit differently than his vision, and now adds useful entries.<br> <span>+</span> * ''Actually my views about the Wiki haven't really changed. I edit things for objectivity when I think they are unfairly or especially negatively biasing something. I also like people to own up to the things they say, and I don't think the info page is enough so I like to add comment attribution. The real difference is I have more of a life, less time, and honestly I feel in part because of me, there are less things I find that are as irritating.'' -- Saul<span>&nbsp;</span>S<span>.</span> </td> </tr> </table> </div> Wiki Social Normshttp://daviswiki.org/Wiki_Social_Norms2011-03-21 20:04:11JabberWokkyRevert to version 8. <div id="content" class="wikipage content"> Differences for Wiki Social Norms<p><strong></strong></p><table> <tr> <td> <span> Deletions are marked with - . </span> </td> <td> <span> Additions are marked with +. </span> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> Line 5: </td> <td> Line 5: </td> </tr> <tr> <td> <span>-</span> When Saul first arrived, he was under the impression that objectivity is a goal, and started removing bias and opinions. Many editors didn't like this, and opinions and biases grew faster wherever Saul tried to remove them. Saul still has his opinion on objectivity, and as a member of the Wiki, has moved the site as a whole a bit toward objectivity, but he now recognizes that Davis Wiki operates a bit differently than his vision, and now adds useful entries.<br> <span>-</span> * ''Actually my views about the Wiki haven't really changed. I edit things for objectivity when I think they are unfairly or especially negatively biasing something. I also like people to own up to the things they say, and I don't think the info page is enough so I like to add comment attribution. The real difference is I have more of a life, less time, and honestly I feel in part because of me, there are less things I find that are as irritating.'' -- SS </td> <td> <span>+</span> When Saul<span>Sugarman</span> first arrived, he was under the impression that objectivity is a goal, and started removing bias and opinions. Many editors didn't like this, and opinions and biases grew faster wherever Saul tried to remove them. Saul still has his opinion on objectivity, and as a member of the Wiki, has moved the site as a whole a bit toward objectivity, but he now recognizes that Davis Wiki operates a bit differently than his vision, and now adds useful entries.<br> <span>+</span> * ''Actually my views about the Wiki haven't really changed. I edit things for objectivity when I think they are unfairly or especially negatively biasing something. I also like people to own up to the things they say, and I don't think the info page is enough so I like to add comment attribution. The real difference is I have more of a life, less time, and honestly I feel in part because of me, there are less things I find that are as irritating.'' -- S<span>aul</span>S<span>ugarman</span> </td> </tr> </table> </div> Wiki Social Normshttp://daviswiki.org/Wiki_Social_Norms2008-09-09 01:40:08SaulSugarmanName edit. <div id="content" class="wikipage content"> Differences for Wiki Social Norms<p><strong></strong></p><table> <tr> <td> <span> Deletions are marked with - . </span> </td> <td> <span> Additions are marked with +. </span> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> Line 5: </td> <td> Line 5: </td> </tr> <tr> <td> <span>-</span> When Saul<span>Sugarman</span> first arrived, he was under the impression that objectivity is a goal, and started removing bias and opinions. Many editors didn't like this, and opinions and biases grew faster wherever Saul tried to remove them. Saul still has his opinion on objectivity, and as a member of the Wiki, has moved the site as a whole a bit toward objectivity, but he now recognizes that Davis Wiki operates a bit differently than his vision, and now adds useful entries.<br> <span>-</span> * ''Actually my views about the Wiki haven't really changed. I edit things for objectivity when I think they are unfairly or especially negatively biasing something. I also like people to own up to the things they say, and I don't think the info page is enough so I like to add comment attribution. The real difference is I have more of a life, less time, and honestly I feel in part because of me, there are less things I find that are as irritating.'' -- S<span>aul</span>S<span>ugarman</span> </td> <td> <span>+</span> When Saul first arrived, he was under the impression that objectivity is a goal, and started removing bias and opinions. Many editors didn't like this, and opinions and biases grew faster wherever Saul tried to remove them. Saul still has his opinion on objectivity, and as a member of the Wiki, has moved the site as a whole a bit toward objectivity, but he now recognizes that Davis Wiki operates a bit differently than his vision, and now adds useful entries.<br> <span>+</span> * ''Actually my views about the Wiki haven't really changed. I edit things for objectivity when I think they are unfairly or especially negatively biasing something. I also like people to own up to the things they say, and I don't think the info page is enough so I like to add comment attribution. The real difference is I have more of a life, less time, and honestly I feel in part because of me, there are less things I find that are as irritating.'' -- SS </td> </tr> </table> </div> Wiki Social Normshttp://daviswiki.org/Wiki_Social_Norms2007-06-05 16:23:34PhilipNeustromremoved question. this was on my todo list for a while <div id="content" class="wikipage content"> Differences for Wiki Social Norms<p><strong></strong></p><table> <tr> <td> <span> Deletions are marked with - . </span> </td> <td> <span> Additions are marked with +. </span> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> Line 5: </td> <td> Line 5: </td> </tr> <tr> <td> <span>- ''I'm not sure the following text is really appropriate (it's a bit too targeted and I'm not sure it would clear up issues for those who are new. It also implies that objectivity isn't "good")'':<br> - * ''I wanted an example so people without reference to Wiki terms could understand. I also wanted a real example, and the remants of Saul's objectivity kick are strewn through Talk: entries. The idea is to make people feel that they can make "mistakes" or offend other users, because plenty of people on the Wiki right now did the same.''<br> - <br> - When SaulSugarman first arrived, he was under the impression that objectivity is a goal, and started removing bias and opinions. Many editors didn't like this, and opinions and biases grew faster wherever Saul tried to remove them. Saul still has his opinion on objectivity, and as a member of the Wiki, has moved the site as a whole a bit toward objectivity, but he now recognizes that Davis Wiki operates a bit differently than his vision, and now adds useful entries.<br> - * Actually my views about the Wiki haven't really changed. I edit things for objectivity when I think they are unfairly or especially negatively biasing something. I also like people to own up to the things they say, and I don't think the info page is enough so I like to add comment attribution. The real difference is I have more of a life, less time, and honestly I feel in part because of me, there are less things I find that are as irritating. -- SaulSugarman</span> </td> <td> <span>+ When SaulSugarman first arrived, he was under the impression that objectivity is a goal, and started removing bias and opinions. Many editors didn't like this, and opinions and biases grew faster wherever Saul tried to remove them. Saul still has his opinion on objectivity, and as a member of the Wiki, has moved the site as a whole a bit toward objectivity, but he now recognizes that Davis Wiki operates a bit differently than his vision, and now adds useful entries.<br> + * ''Actually my views about the Wiki haven't really changed. I edit things for objectivity when I think they are unfairly or especially negatively biasing something. I also like people to own up to the things they say, and I don't think the info page is enough so I like to add comment attribution. The real difference is I have more of a life, less time, and honestly I feel in part because of me, there are less things I find that are as irritating.'' -- SaulSugarman</span> </td> </tr> </table> </div> Wiki Social Normshttp://daviswiki.org/Wiki_Social_Norms2007-01-23 22:15:02JasonAlleradding link <div id="content" class="wikipage content"> Differences for Wiki Social Norms<p><strong></strong></p><table> <tr> <td> <span> Deletions are marked with - . </span> </td> <td> <span> Additions are marked with +. </span> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> Line 1: </td> <td> Line 1: </td> </tr> <tr> <td> <span>-</span> You'll see many people talking about "Wiki Ethics" and "rules". There are no specific rules here on Davis Wiki... but like any group that has been around, we've developed a society with traditions that allow us to work together. Like most societies, if you've been around for awhile, you'll garner enough respect to bend those traditions a bit, but going against them from the beginning will likely irritate a large group of people... sometimes a good thing, sometimes a bad thing. </td> <td> <span>+</span> You'll see many people talking about "<span>["</span>Wiki Ethics<span>"]</span>" and "rules". There are no specific rules here on Davis Wiki... but like any group that has been around, we've developed a society with traditions that allow us to work together. Like most societies, if you've been around for awhile, you'll garner enough respect to bend those traditions a bit, but going against them from the beginning will likely irritate a large group of people... sometimes a good thing, sometimes a bad thing. </td> </tr> </table> </div> Wiki Social Normshttp://daviswiki.org/Wiki_Social_Norms2007-01-21 21:57:24SaulSugarmanLink removing. <div id="content" class="wikipage content"> Differences for Wiki Social Norms<p><strong></strong></p><table> <tr> <td> <span> Deletions are marked with - . </span> </td> <td> <span> Additions are marked with +. </span> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> Line 3: </td> <td> Line 3: </td> </tr> <tr> <td> <span>-</span> For example, Most entries operate on a "multiple bias" system. Rather than trying to be objective, an entry goes up, and somebody with a different bias adds a different viewpoint - the process continues until the entry accumulates many different biases and becomes well rounded ''and'' opinionated.<span>&nbsp;</span> </td> <td> <span>+</span> For example, Most entries operate on a "multiple bias" system. Rather than trying to be objective, an entry goes up, and somebody with a different bias adds a different viewpoint - the process continues until the entry accumulates many different biases and becomes well rounded ''and'' opinionated. </td> </tr> <tr> <td> Line 6: </td> <td> Line 6: </td> </tr> <tr> <td> <span>-</span> * ''I wanted an example so people without reference to Wiki terms could understand. I also wanted a real example, and the remants of Saul's objectivity kick are strewn through Talk: entries. The idea is to make people feel that they can make "mistakes" or offend other users, because plenty of people on the Wiki right now did the same.''<span>&nbsp;</span> </td> <td> <span>+</span> * ''I wanted an example so people without reference to Wiki terms could understand. I also wanted a real example, and the remants of Saul's objectivity kick are strewn through Talk: entries. The idea is to make people feel that they can make "mistakes" or offend other users, because plenty of people on the Wiki right now did the same.'' </td> </tr> <tr> <td> Line 8: </td> <td> Line 8: </td> </tr> <tr> <td> <span>-</span> When <span>["</span>SaulSugarman<span>"]</span> first arrived, he was under the impression that objectivity is a goal, and started removing bias and opinions. Many editors didn't like this, and opinions and biases grew faster wherever Saul tried to remove them. Saul still has his opinion on objectivity, and as a member of the Wiki, has moved the site as a whole a bit toward objectivity, but he now recognizes that Davis Wiki operates a bit differently than his vision, and now adds useful entries.<br> <span>-</span> * Actually my views about the Wiki haven't really changed. I edit things for objectivity when I think they are unfairly or especially negatively biasing something. I also like people to own up to the things they say, and I don't think the info page is enough so I like to add comment attribution. The real difference is I have more of a life, less time, and honestly I feel in part because of me, there are less things I find that are as irritating. -- <span>["</span>SaulSugarman<span>"]</span> </td> <td> <span>+</span> When SaulSugarman first arrived, he was under the impression that objectivity is a goal, and started removing bias and opinions. Many editors didn't like this, and opinions and biases grew faster wherever Saul tried to remove them. Saul still has his opinion on objectivity, and as a member of the Wiki, has moved the site as a whole a bit toward objectivity, but he now recognizes that Davis Wiki operates a bit differently than his vision, and now adds useful entries.<br> <span>+</span> * Actually my views about the Wiki haven't really changed. I edit things for objectivity when I think they are unfairly or especially negatively biasing something. I also like people to own up to the things they say, and I don't think the info page is enough so I like to add comment attribution. The real difference is I have more of a life, less time, and honestly I feel in part because of me, there are less things I find that are as irritating. -- SaulSugarman </td> </tr> </table> </div> Wiki Social Normshttp://daviswiki.org/Wiki_Social_Norms2005-08-03 22:49:17SaulSugarmanComment added. <div id="content" class="wikipage content"> Differences for Wiki Social Norms<p><strong></strong></p><table> <tr> <td> <span> Deletions are marked with - . </span> </td> <td> <span> Additions are marked with +. </span> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> Line 9: </td> <td> Line 9: </td> </tr> <tr> <td> </td> <td> <span>+ * Actually my views about the Wiki haven't really changed. I edit things for objectivity when I think they are unfairly or especially negatively biasing something. I also like people to own up to the things they say, and I don't think the info page is enough so I like to add comment attribution. The real difference is I have more of a life, less time, and honestly I feel in part because of me, there are less things I find that are as irritating. -- ["SaulSugarman"]</span> </td> </tr> </table> </div> Wiki Social Normshttp://daviswiki.org/Wiki_Social_Norms2005-04-03 18:30:25JabberWokky <div id="content" class="wikipage content"> Differences for Wiki Social Norms<p><strong></strong></p><table> <tr> <td> <span> Deletions are marked with - . </span> </td> <td> <span> Additions are marked with +. </span> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> Line 7: </td> <td> Line 7: </td> </tr> <tr> <td> </td> <td> <span>+ </span> </td> </tr> </table> </div> Wiki Social Normshttp://daviswiki.org/Wiki_Social_Norms2005-04-03 18:22:01JabberWokkyReply <div id="content" class="wikipage content"> Differences for Wiki Social Norms<p><strong></strong></p><table> <tr> <td> <span> Deletions are marked with - . </span> </td> <td> <span> Additions are marked with +. </span> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> Line 6: </td> <td> Line 6: </td> </tr> <tr> <td> </td> <td> <span>+ * ''I wanted an example so people without reference to Wiki terms could understand. I also wanted a real example, and the remants of Saul's objectivity kick are strewn through Talk: entries. The idea is to make people feel that they can make "mistakes" or offend other users, because plenty of people on the Wiki right now did the same.'' </span> </td> </tr> </table> </div> Wiki Social Normshttp://daviswiki.org/Wiki_Social_Norms2005-04-03 16:57:23PhilipNeustromquestion <div id="content" class="wikipage content"> Differences for Wiki Social Norms<p><strong></strong></p><table> <tr> <td> <span> Deletions are marked with - . </span> </td> <td> <span> Additions are marked with +. </span> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> Line 3: </td> <td> Line 3: </td> </tr> <tr> <td> - <span>For </span>ex<span>ample, Most entries operate on a</span> "<span>multiple bias</span>"<span>&nbsp;system. Rather than trying to be objective, an entry goes up, and somebody with a different bias adds a different viewpoint - the process continues until the entry accumulates many different biases and becomes well rounded ''and'' opinionated.</span> When ["SaulSugarman"] first arrived, he was under the impression that objectivity is a goal, and started removing bias and opinions. Many editors didn't like this, and opinions and biases grew faster wherever Saul tried to remove them. Saul still has his opinion on objectivity, and as a member of the Wiki, has moved the site as a whole a bit toward objectivity, but he now recognizes that Davis Wiki operates a bit differently than his vision, and now adds useful entries. </td> <td> <span>+ For example, Most entries operate on a "multiple bias" system. Rather than trying to be objective, an entry goes up, and somebody with a different bias adds a different viewpoint </span>- <span>the process continues until the entry accumulates many different biases and becomes well rounded ''and'' opinionated. <br> + <br> + ''I'm not sure the following t</span>ex<span>t is really appropriate (it's a bit too targeted and I'm not sure it would clear up issues for those who are new. It also implies that objectivity isn't</span> "<span>good</span>"<span>)'':<br> + </span> When ["SaulSugarman"] first arrived, he was under the impression that objectivity is a goal, and started removing bias and opinions. Many editors didn't like this, and opinions and biases grew faster wherever Saul tried to remove them. Saul still has his opinion on objectivity, and as a member of the Wiki, has moved the site as a whole a bit toward objectivity, but he now recognizes that Davis Wiki operates a bit differently than his vision, and now adds useful entries. </td> </tr> </table> </div> Wiki Social Normshttp://daviswiki.org/Wiki_Social_Norms2005-04-03 16:32:53JabberWokky <div id="content" class="wikipage content"> Differences for Wiki Social Norms<p><strong></strong></p><table> <tr> <td> <span> Deletions are marked with - . </span> </td> <td> <span> Additions are marked with +. </span> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> Line 1: </td> <td> Line 1: </td> </tr> <tr> <td> </td> <td> <span>+ You'll see many people talking about "Wiki Ethics" and "rules". There are no specific rules here on Davis Wiki... but like any group that has been around, we've developed a society with traditions that allow us to work together. Like most societies, if you've been around for awhile, you'll garner enough respect to bend those traditions a bit, but going against them from the beginning will likely irritate a large group of people... sometimes a good thing, sometimes a bad thing.<br> + <br> + For example, Most entries operate on a "multiple bias" system. Rather than trying to be objective, an entry goes up, and somebody with a different bias adds a different viewpoint - the process continues until the entry accumulates many different biases and becomes well rounded ''and'' opinionated. When ["SaulSugarman"] first arrived, he was under the impression that objectivity is a goal, and started removing bias and opinions. Many editors didn't like this, and opinions and biases grew faster wherever Saul tried to remove them. Saul still has his opinion on objectivity, and as a member of the Wiki, has moved the site as a whole a bit toward objectivity, but he now recognizes that Davis Wiki operates a bit differently than his vision, and now adds useful entries.</span> </td> </tr> </table> </div>