Recent Changes for "Winter 2007 ASUCD Election/Talk" - Davis Wiki

Winter 2007 ASUCD Election/Talk

JasonAller — 2009-01-09 19:04:05

(quick edit)

Differences for Winter 2007 ASUCD Election/Talk

Deletions are marked with - .	Additions are marked with +.
Line 1:	Line 1:
- This page is for discussing the contents of ["Winter 2007 ASUCD Election"].	+ This page is for ["Talk Pages" discussing] the contents of ["Winter 2007 ASUCD Election"].

Winter 2007 ASUCD Election/Talk

BrentLaabs — 2008-09-04 20:35:51

link fix. funny page still

Differences for Winter 2007 ASUCD Election/Talk

Deletions are marked with - .	Additions are marked with +.
Line 7:	Line 7:
- I'm not convinced that it was a mistake, considering the amount of LEAD promotion she's been doing. --["JosephBleckman"]	+ I'm not convinced that it was a mistake, considering the amount of LEAD promotion she's been doing. --["Users/JosephBleckman"]
Line 9:	Line 9:
- * I'd like to be able to trust that, but in this case considering her campaign so far, I don't think I can. —["JosephBleckman"]	+ * I'd like to be able to trust that, but in this case considering her campaign so far, I don't think I can. —["Users/JosephBleckman"]
Line 13:	Line 13:
- * I have mainly been basing what I've been editing based upon what's been in the Aggie/facebook. If you could provide us with a list of the members of the LEAD organization that could help us decide what to say about her status. --["JosephBleckman"] - * Since facebook is the end all info site for ya, look at the names in the LEAD facebook group and that will give you a good notion of who our dues-paying members are. - ["JamesSchwab"] - * You require dues? Like, of the non-Official Slate candidates too? I supose that adds another level to a potential definition of Slate affiliation, however, I feel that she would still qualify as being LEAD affiliated if a LEAD agent is behind her run. --["JosephBleckman"]	+ * I have mainly been basing what I've been editing based upon what's been in the Aggie/facebook. If you could provide us with a list of the members of the LEAD organization that could help us decide what to say about her status. --["Users/JosephBleckman"] + * Since facebook is the end all info site for ya, look at the names in the LEAD facebook group and that will give you a good notion of who our dues-paying members are. - ["Users/JamesSchwab"] + * You require dues? Like, of the non-Official Slate candidates too? I supose that adds another level to a potential definition of Slate affiliation, however, I feel that she would still qualify as being LEAD affiliated if a LEAD agent is behind her run. --["Users/JosephBleckman"]
Line 18:	Line 18:
- * Agent = Someone in their organization structure. As you know, the ASUCD Political Parties are made up of more than just their official candidates. --["JosephBleckman"]	+ * Agent = Someone in their organization structure. As you know, the ASUCD Political Parties are made up of more than just their official candidates. --["Users/JosephBleckman"]
Line 20:	Line 20:
- * I would like to add that although I am an insider to this whole debate, it's clear that Rozetti is LEAD, the whole idea of her candidacy is to increase the number of votes LEAD obtains and it is no different than Student Focus running 8 people. LEAD needs more votes, they are running the same number of candidates Student Focus is because they want to win. It's clear. ["GregWebb"]	+ * I would like to add that although I am an insider to this whole debate, it's clear that Rozetti is LEAD, the whole idea of her candidacy is to increase the number of votes LEAD obtains and it is no different than Student Focus running 8 people. LEAD needs more votes, they are running the same number of candidates Student Focus is because they want to win. It's clear. ["Users/GregWebb"]
Line 22:	Line 22:
- Despite what everybody says, I want to say once and for all that ["George Ajlouny"] is not running on the LEAD slate. He's an independent now, not because he has LEAD tendencies, but because he feels that he can better represent his constituents as an independent than on Student Focus. --["BrentLaabs"] - * George tends to lean more towards Student Focus, I think. Perhaps it would be proper to list him as being part of the Student Focus party in government, yet not the Student Focus organization, nor slate? Seems the most discriptive depiction of him. --["JosephBleckman"]	+ Despite what everybody says, I want to say once and for all that ["George Ajlouny"] is not running on the LEAD slate. He's an independent now, not because he has LEAD tendencies, but because he feels that he can better represent his constituents as an independent than on Student Focus. --["Users/BrentLaabs"] + * George tends to lean more towards Student Focus, I think. Perhaps it would be proper to list him as being part of the Student Focus party in government, yet not the Student Focus organization, nor slate? Seems the most descriptive depiction of him. --["Users/JosephBleckman"]
Line 25:	Line 25:
- * Non sequitor? Because that was soooo relevant --["Users/MaxMikalonis"]	+ * Non sequitur? Because that was soooo relevant --["Users/MaxMikalonis"]

Winter 2007 ASUCD Election/Talk

MaxMikalonis — 2007-09-10 20:10:19

Differences for Winter 2007 ASUCD Election/Talk

Deletions are marked with - .	Additions are marked with +.
Line 4:	Line 4:
- Regarding ["Erica Rozetti"]-- It was not an Aggie misprint, she said to Richard Proctor that she was running as ["LEAD"], and so that is what Proctor reported. If anything, it was Rozetti's mistake for saying she was running with LEAD, but by no means the Aggies. I had the conversation with Proctor the morning the article came out (I read it online), and because he was the one to write the Names of the Dead piece. --["Max Mikalonis"]	+ Regarding ["Erica Rozetti"]-- It was not an Aggie misprint, she said to Richard Proctor that she was running as ["LEAD"], and so that is what Proctor reported. If anything, it was Rozetti's mistake for saying she was running with LEAD, but by no means the Aggies. I had the conversation with Proctor the morning the article came out (I read it online), and because he was the one to write the Names of the Dead piece. --["Users/MaxMikalonis"]
Line 25:	Line 25:
- * Non sequitor? Because that was soooo relevant --["Max Mikalonis"]	+ * Non sequitor? Because that was soooo relevant --["Users/MaxMikalonis"]

Winter 2007 ASUCD Election/Talk

AndrewBianchi — 2007-02-12 16:49:53

Differences for Winter 2007 ASUCD Election/Talk

Deletions are marked with - .	Additions are marked with +.
Line 26:	Line 26:
	+ + Get over yourselves. There are the candidates that contribute money to their own elections, and they have supporters. Just because someone supports a candidate doesn't mean he or she is a member of that candidate's slate. That is a ridiculous assumption. For instance, I have voiced my support of a few StuFo candidates in the past, but I ran on L.E.A.D. in Winter of 2006. What does that make me? I never paid anything beyond my campaign finances, and I don't walk around saying I'm a member of an organization that has no written or recorded membership. I am glad that many of you have decided someone's affiliation based of assumptions and inferences rather than just confirming it with her. --["Andrew Bianchi"]

Winter 2007 ASUCD Election/Talk

JamesSchwab — 2007-02-12 11:01:12

Differences for Winter 2007 ASUCD Election/Talk

Deletions are marked with - .	Additions are marked with +.
Line 19:	Line 19:
	+ * I do not have the latest numbers, since I am not longer campaign manager, of how many of our dues-paying members are active in ASUCD, but if you ask someone and they do pay the dues they have been trained to proudly say "I am a LEADer". -["James Schwab"]

Winter 2007 ASUCD Election/Talk

JosephBleckman — 2007-02-12 10:17:50

adding an i.

Differences for Winter 2007 ASUCD Election/Talk

Deletions are marked with - .	Additions are marked with +.
Line 18:	Line 18:
- * Agent = Someone in their organzation structure. As you know, the ASUCD Political Parties are made up of more than just their official candidates. --["JosephBleckman"]	+ * Agent = Someone in their organization structure. As you know, the ASUCD Political Parties are made up of more than just their official candidates. --["JosephBleckman"]

Winter 2007 ASUCD Election/Talk

JosephBleckman — 2007-02-12 10:15:35

Reply to Shannon

Differences for Winter 2007 ASUCD Election/Talk

Deletions are marked with - .	Additions are marked with +.
Line 18:	Line 18:
- * Agent = Someone in their organzation structure. --["JosephBleckman"]	+ * Agent = Someone in their organzation structure. As you know, the ASUCD Political Parties are made up of more than just their official candidates. --["JosephBleckman"]

Winter 2007 ASUCD Election/Talk

JosephBleckman — 2007-02-12 10:14:31

Differences for Winter 2007 ASUCD Election/Talk

Deletions are marked with - .	Additions are marked with +.
Line 18:	Line 18:
	+ * Agent = Someone in their organzation structure. --["JosephBleckman"]

Winter 2007 ASUCD Election/Talk

MatthewShannon — 2007-02-12 01:47:36

Differences for Winter 2007 ASUCD Election/Talk

Deletions are marked with - .	Additions are marked with +.
Line 17:	Line 17:
	+ * LEAD has "agents"? I guess I'll need to start watching my back when I'm on the 3rd floor ~Matt Shannon

Winter 2007 ASUCD Election/Talk

JamesSchwab — 2007-02-12 00:58:52

Differences for Winter 2007 ASUCD Election/Talk

Deletions are marked with - .	Additions are marked with +.
Line 16:	Line 16:
	+ * I'm not sure if she has renewed it but she was a card-carrying member for a while. ["James Schwab"]

Winter 2007 ASUCD Election/Talk

JosephBleckman — 2007-02-12 00:48:32

Differences for Winter 2007 ASUCD Election/Talk

Deletions are marked with - .	Additions are marked with +.
Line 14:	Line 14:
- * Since facebook is the end all info site for ya, look at the names in the LEAD facebook group and that will give you a good notion of who our dues-paying members are.	+ * Since facebook is the end all info site for ya, look at the names in the LEAD facebook group and that will give you a good notion of who our dues-paying members are. - ["JamesSchwab"] + * You require dues? Like, of the non-Official Slate candidates too? I supose that adds another level to a potential definition of Slate affiliation, however, I feel that she would still qualify as being LEAD affiliated if a LEAD agent is behind her run. --["JosephBleckman"]

Winter 2007 ASUCD Election/Talk

JamesSchwab — 2007-02-12 00:30:15

do not forget to cross all t's

Differences for Winter 2007 ASUCD Election/Talk

Deletions are marked with - .	Additions are marked with +.
Line 14:	Line 14:
- * Since facebook is the end all info sie for ya, look at the names in the LEAD facebook group and that will give you a good notion of who are dues paying members are.	+ * Since facebook is the end all info site for ya, look at the names in the LEAD facebook group and that will give you a good notion of who our dues-paying members are.

Winter 2007 ASUCD Election/Talk

JamesSchwab — 2007-02-12 00:28:59

Differences for Winter 2007 ASUCD Election/Talk

Deletions are marked with - .	Additions are marked with +.
Line 14:	Line 14:
-	+ * Since facebook is the end all info sie for ya, look at the names in the LEAD facebook group and that will give you a good notion of who are dues paying members are.

Winter 2007 ASUCD Election/Talk

GregWebb — 2007-02-12 00:24:47

Differences for Winter 2007 ASUCD Election/Talk

Deletions are marked with - .	Additions are marked with +.
Line 15:	Line 15:
	+ * I would like to add that although I am an insider to this whole debate, it's clear that Rozetti is LEAD, the whole idea of her candidacy is to increase the number of votes LEAD obtains and it is no different than Student Focus running 8 people. LEAD needs more votes, they are running the same number of candidates Student Focus is because they want to win. It's clear. ["GregWebb"] +

Winter 2007 ASUCD Election/Talk

JosephBleckman — 2007-02-12 00:22:53

Differences for Winter 2007 ASUCD Election/Talk

Deletions are marked with - .	Additions are marked with +.
Line 13:	Line 13:
- ----	+ * I have mainly been basing what I've been editing based upon what's been in the Aggie/facebook. If you could provide us with a list of the members of the LEAD organization that could help us decide what to say about her status. --["JosephBleckman"] +
Line 15:	Line 16:
	+ * George tends to lean more towards Student Focus, I think. Perhaps it would be proper to list him as being part of the Student Focus party in government, yet not the Student Focus organization, nor slate? Seems the most discriptive depiction of him. --["JosephBleckman"] +

Winter 2007 ASUCD Election/Talk

MaxMikalonis — 2007-02-12 00:22:14

Differences for Winter 2007 ASUCD Election/Talk

Deletions are marked with - .	Additions are marked with +.
Line 15:	Line 15:
	+ * Non sequitor? Because that was soooo relevant --["Max Mikalonis"]

Winter 2007 ASUCD Election/Talk

BrentLaabs — 2007-02-12 00:19:15

setting the record straight

Differences for Winter 2007 ASUCD Election/Talk

Deletions are marked with - .	Additions are marked with +.
Line 12:	Line 12:
	+ + ---- + Despite what everybody says, I want to say once and for all that ["George Ajlouny"] is not running on the LEAD slate. He's an independent now, not because he has LEAD tendencies, but because he feels that he can better represent his constituents as an independent than on Student Focus. --["BrentLaabs"]

Winter 2007 ASUCD Election/Talk

AndrewPeake — 2007-02-12 00:15:06

Differences for Winter 2007 ASUCD Election/Talk

Deletions are marked with - .	Additions are marked with +.
Line 11:	Line 11:
- sorry, I was writing that when you made the talk page, andrew	+ sorry, I was writing that when you made the talk page, Joseph says he doesn't trust me. All I can say is that LEAD is only running six candidates (there are only six spots, makes sense to me) and if you consider that I am a active member of the organization, and Joseph is of the rival slate, i might now what is going on. Anyway, I won't edit the page, i figure someone outside of all this should make the decision based on the facts, have a good night. Andrew

Winter 2007 ASUCD Election/Talk

JosephBleckman — 2007-02-12 00:13:45

Differences for Winter 2007 ASUCD Election/Talk

Deletions are marked with - .	Additions are marked with +.
Line 9:	Line 9:
	+ * I'd like to be able to trust that, but in this case considering her campaign so far, I don't think I can. —["JosephBleckman"]

Winter 2007 ASUCD Election/Talk

AndrewPeake — 2007-02-12 00:10:16

Differences for Winter 2007 ASUCD Election/Talk

Deletions are marked with - .	Additions are marked with +.
Line 9:	Line 9:
	+ + sorry, I was writing that when you made the talk page, andrew

Winter 2007 ASUCD Election/Talk

MaxMikalonis — 2007-02-12 00:08:02

Because They aren't using the talk page.

Differences for Winter 2007 ASUCD Election/Talk

Deletions are marked with - .	Additions are marked with +.
Line 8:	Line 8:
	+ * What do you mean? We have six candidates for six spots. That is a fact. Kinda of black and white. I really don't think there is any massive conspiricy theory. Independants and smaller slates support Exec tickets all the time. Rob and FUCK supported the LEAD exec, but that didn't make them LEAD candidates. I don't want to do a revert war...but the facts are facts, and I figure that is what we should stick to. Andrew

Winter 2007 ASUCD Election/Talk

MaxMikalonis — 2007-02-11 23:58:51

from the page AndrewPeake by JosephBleckman

Differences for Winter 2007 ASUCD Election/Talk

Deletions are marked with - .	Additions are marked with +.
Line 5:	Line 5:
	+ + --- + I'm not convinced that it was a mistake, considering the amount of LEAD promotion she's been doing. --["JosephBleckman"]

Winter 2007 ASUCD Election/Talk

MaxMikalonis — 2007-02-11 23:55:20

Differences for Winter 2007 ASUCD Election/Talk

Deletions are marked with - .	Additions are marked with +.
Line 1:	Line 1:
	+ This page is for discussing the contents of ["Winter 2007 ASUCD Election"]. + + + Regarding ["Erica Rozetti"]-- It was not an Aggie misprint, she said to Richard Proctor that she was running as ["LEAD"], and so that is what Proctor reported. If anything, it was Rozetti's mistake for saying she was running with LEAD, but by no means the Aggies. I had the conversation with Proctor the morning the article came out (I read it online), and because he was the one to write the Names of the Dead piece. --["Max Mikalonis"]