Recent Changes for "Winter 2009 ASUCD Election" - Davis Wiki

Winter 2009 ASUCD Election

JasonAller — 2009-03-13 21:07:40

(quick edit)

Differences for Winter 2009 ASUCD Election

Deletions are marked with - .	Additions are marked with +.
Line 59:	Line 59:
- The Senate Candidates' Debate were held on February 11th, 2009 at 11:30 AM in the ["ASUCD Coffee House"]. The Elections Committee was joined by the ["California Aggie"] Editor In Chief ["Richard Proctor"] and Campus Editor Aly Bonde as the California Aggie once again co-sponsored the candidate debates.	+ The Senate Candidates' Debate were held on February 11th, 2009 at 11:30 AM in the ["ASUCD Coffee House"]. The Elections Committee was joined by the ["California Aggie"] Editor In Chief ["Richard Procter"] and Campus Editor Aly Bonde as the California Aggie once again co-sponsored the candidate debates.

Winter 2009 ASUCD Election

BrentLaabs — 2009-03-06 22:26:51

reply to Jon & election analysis: sexism, fees, chmod & piñatas. TGI Friday, man

Differences for Winter 2009 ASUCD Election

Deletions are marked with - .	Additions are marked with +.
Line 11:	Line 11:
- * Joe Chatham and Chris Dietrich[[Footnote(The official tally showed Joe and Chris winning by 13 votes. Complaints for an election recount are currently underway.)]]	+ * Joe Chatham and Chris Dietrich, by an astonishingly tight 13 votes +
Line 264:	Line 265:
- ''2009-03-05 19:18:36'' [[nbsp]] Ahh, I miss being on the Elections Committee. If this is the public controversy I can just imagine what was going on privately. And here I thought my Senate lose by 42 votes was close, I never thought I'd see an executive election decided by 13 votes. - ["JonathonLeathers"]	+ ''2009-03-05 19:18:36'' [[nbsp]] Ahh, I miss being on the Elections Committee. If this is the public controversy I can just imagine what was going on privately. And here I thought my Senate loss by 42 votes was close; I never thought I'd see an executive election decided by 13 votes. - ["JonathonLeathers"] + I think if you were still on the Elections Committee, with a vote that close, the elections committee would have just declared victory for the ["Elections Committee Slate"]. --["Users/BrentLaabs"] + ------ + My personal theory is this: LEAD has started to get sort of a "brand name fatigue", as people search for something better. Especially this time, because they haven't had a organized opposition for a long time. So the one time that qualified people run (to actually win; Rob and Arlen were insanely qualified), they had a decent shot of winning. A major boost to the opposition was the fact that LEAD was running a woman, and men just "seem" more presidential at UCD. So while people are up in arms about the election being racist, the reality is that our generation isn't really racist, nor does it see membership in another race as a negative attribute (this is not to say that our generation doesn't perpetuate racially biased social structures). However, sexism is alive and well, and works at a more subtle level. ASUCD has only had 5 female presidents in 35 years -- for comparison, ASU Minnesota had at least this many ''before'' 1975. Additionally, LEAD was in charge for a long while, so it becomes a good target for blaming the incompetence that comes with being a student government. With no one else to compare to in student memory (4 years), it isn't too hard to convince people that its time for a change. + + Meanwhile, LEAD didn't manage to leverage its advantages very effectively this election. LEAD [http://theaggie.org/article/3123 paid the price] in votes for opposing ["The Green Initiative Fund" The Green Initiative Fee], but didn't manage to embed this simple equation into voters minds that '''Chatham = Higher Fees'''. They didn't even get [http://theaggie.org/article/2733 that idea] through [http://theaggie.org/article/2736 to the Aggie]. They will probably lose the environmental constituency in the short term, but this will be partially compensated for in securing the votes of conservatives. But ultimately, they didn't run a good campaign on the ground. Key personnel like Derrick Lennox, Paul Harms, and Jack Zwald simply weren't used or underused -- out of the LEAD inner circle, they went off to run a wildly successful No on TGIF campaign. While LEAD's intelligence network is still functioning pretty well -- they quickly got word of Greg Webb's discovery that Alex Park had forgotten to run {{{chmod o-rwx}}}, it was only then that LEAD campaigned with the fury they should have to begin with. + + It will be interesting to see how the situation will evolve in the future. If LEAD sticks together, they can override any veto or kill any nominee, but too much obstructionism is dangerous. Especially if you don't offer viable alternatives. Still, a 13-vote win is hardly a mandate, especially when the largest policy initiative from said candidate was bloodily euthanized at the polls. ACT is still a joke ("We're an organization, not a slate" lol). Unless Dietrich makes a concerted effort to start another slate to continue the executive's view of student government, LEAD will probably regain dominance in future elections. However, the point of this election has been made, and we've all been reminded that LEAD is not invincible nor infallible. The campaign of a few individuals in LEAD's base to challenge the elections result through [http://theaggie.org/article/3130 petitions and protest] has done damage to the [http://theaggie.org/article/3130 perception of LEAD] and that of the [http://community.livejournal.com/ucdavis/4358909.html Association as a whole]. There's a proper venue to challenge the results: the ASUCD Court and/or SJA. Remember guys, petitions and protest while not focusing on direct solutions is what makes ["UCSA"] suck. So unless they can get some control of their base and return to the apathetic side of the [http://theaggie.org/article/3151 apathy/piñata cycle], LEAD will start losing out in future elections. + + My advice to anyone who wants to help their party win in the future: stop whining about pointless things like office hours, and start doing stuff to make student life better. --["Users/BrentLaabs"]

Winter 2009 ASUCD Election

JonathonLeathers — 2009-03-05 19:18:57

(quick edit)

Differences for Winter 2009 ASUCD Election

Deletions are marked with - .	Additions are marked with +.
Line 264:	Line 264:
- ''2009-03-05 19:18:36'' [[nbsp]] Ahh, I miss being on the Elections Committee. If this is the public controversy I can just imagine what was going on privately. And here I thought my Senate lose by 42 votes was close, I never thought I'd see an executive election decided by 13 votes. - ["JonathonLeathers"] --["Users/JonathonLeathers"]	+ ''2009-03-05 19:18:36'' [[nbsp]] Ahh, I miss being on the Elections Committee. If this is the public controversy I can just imagine what was going on privately. And here I thought my Senate lose by 42 votes was close, I never thought I'd see an executive election decided by 13 votes. - ["JonathonLeathers"]

Winter 2009 ASUCD Election

JonathonLeathers — 2009-03-05 19:18:36

Comment added.

Differences for Winter 2009 ASUCD Election

Deletions are marked with - .	Additions are marked with +.
Line 263:	Line 263:
	+ ------ + ''2009-03-05 19:18:36'' [[nbsp]] Ahh, I miss being on the Elections Committee. If this is the public controversy I can just imagine what was going on privately. And here I thought my Senate lose by 42 votes was close, I never thought I'd see an executive election decided by 13 votes. - ["JonathonLeathers"] --["Users/JonathonLeathers"]

Winter 2009 ASUCD Election

condemned2bfree — 2009-03-02 13:38:17

Comment added.

Differences for Winter 2009 ASUCD Election

Deletions are marked with - .	Additions are marked with +.
Line 261:	Line 261:
	+ ------ + ''2009-03-02 13:38:17'' [[nbsp]] I'm not a student and could care less who won the election, but as a community onlooker I can't help myself from asking, WTF? The election is over. Move on. There was way more than enough time to vote, and more time was added after the glitch. To call for a new election is a waste of time and money. A better use of that time and money would be to convene a commission to analyze what went wrong and how it may be prevented in the future. But to spend all this time and energy on redoing the election prevents everyone from taking care of the students' business, which is the job of the ASUCD in the first place. By attempting to prevent the seating of the executives and senators now, you simply delay any work from getting done, spiting everyone else for the sake of your own righteous indignation. Move on. --["Users/condemned2bfree"]

Winter 2009 ASUCD Election

RyanMeyerhoff — 2009-03-01 20:52:32

(quick edit)

Differences for Winter 2009 ASUCD Election

Deletions are marked with - .	Additions are marked with +.
Line 250:	Line 250:
- I would disagree, the Bylaws merely say the complaint is sent to SJA and gives SJA no power over the complaint or the Elections Committee itself. The ASUCD Court, however, is the body which empowered by the constitution to make a ruling on this complaint. I see the sending of the complain to SJA as a way to check for ethics violations that potentially result in disciplinary probation.	+

Winter 2009 ASUCD Election

RyanMeyerhoff — 2009-03-01 20:52:08

(quick edit)

Differences for Winter 2009 ASUCD Election

Deletions are marked with - .	Additions are marked with +.
Line 248:	Line 248:
- So, for now, the newly elected ASUCD Senators hold their office while SJA makes a decision as per the complaint and it gets appealed to the ASUCD Court for them to make a final verdict. (assuming SJA's decision is appealed to the court) --["Users/RyanMeyerhoff"]	+

Winter 2009 ASUCD Election

RyanMeyerhoff — 2009-03-01 20:52:02

(quick edit)

Differences for Winter 2009 ASUCD Election

Deletions are marked with - .	Additions are marked with +.
Line 246:	Line 246:
- Point a) includes the ASUCD Student Bill of Rights, which is what I believe to be cited as the violation committed by the Elections Committee in the filed complaint. Point c) gives the ASUCD Court the final say on any election issues and overrules any decision by SJA.	+

Winter 2009 ASUCD Election

RyanMeyerhoff — 2009-03-01 20:51:53

(quick edit)

Differences for Winter 2009 ASUCD Election

Deletions are marked with - .	Additions are marked with +.
Line 244:	Line 244:
- However, the ASUCD Court maintains appellate jurisdiction over any elections issues and is backed in the Constitution as per Article 7, Section 2; "The ASUCD Court Shall a)Have the ultimate authority to interpret the wording of this Constitution and that of legislation enacted pursuant to this Constitution ... c) Review complaints regarding the Elections Committee or any other office or body of ASUCD;"	+

Winter 2009 ASUCD Election

RyanMeyerhoff — 2009-03-01 20:51:46

(quick edit)

Differences for Winter 2009 ASUCD Election

Deletions are marked with - .	Additions are marked with +.
Line 242:	Line 242:
- ''2009-02-28 18:41:34'' [[nbsp]] At this stage in the game SJA is reviewing the complaint filed against the Election Committee (as per the Bylaws, Chapter 4, Section 413, Subsection E; "A complaint against the Elections Committee may be filed with the Student Government Advisor and will be forwarded to Student Judicial Affairs.")	+
Line 261:	Line 261:
-

Winter 2009 ASUCD Election

RyanMeyerhoff — 2009-03-01 20:51:27

(quick edit)

Differences for Winter 2009 ASUCD Election

Deletions are marked with - .	Additions are marked with +.
Line 261:	Line 261:
- ''2009-03-01 12:38:28'' [[nbsp]] I concur with the above comment. This is not a typical complaint filed against a candidate for which the Elections Committee can defer a decision to SJA. This is a complaint against the committee itself, and as per the Bylaws is sent to SJA. (speaking frankly, I do not believe SJA should have jurisdiction over any complaints against the Election Committee. SJA should take a no preference stance to this case as it has nothing to do with candidate misconduct). -	+

Winter 2009 ASUCD Election

RyanMeyerhoff — 2009-03-01 20:51:13

(quick edit)

Differences for Winter 2009 ASUCD Election

Deletions are marked with - .	Additions are marked with +.
Line 263:	Line 263:
- In either case, whatever SJA does with the complaint it will likely be appealed to the ASUCD Court (as both sides of the issue have at least 1 voice involved enough to request the appeal). --["Users/RyanMeyerhoff"]

Winter 2009 ASUCD Election

BrentLaabs — 2009-03-01 19:44:34

Differences for Winter 2009 ASUCD Election

Deletions are marked with - .	Additions are marked with +.
Line 259:	Line 259:
	+ * Wow that clause is extremely poorly written. Might as well swear in Rod Blagojevich, too; doesn't matter if you broke the rules. There still might be precedent by the court that candidates shouldn't have been sworn in, though.

Winter 2009 ASUCD Election

MaxMikalonis — 2009-03-01 18:52:50

Differences for Winter 2009 ASUCD Election

Deletions are marked with - .	Additions are marked with +.
Line 258:	Line 258:
	+ * Sorry Brent, but you definitely don't know the situation @ the Senate. The candidates were seated in accordance with the constitution because there is nothing in that document regarding any pending complaints anywhere, and so it was argued that to delay would cause a lawsuit because the delay was unconstitutional, but several senators had threatened to walk out in order to stop the candidates from being seated. Also, the meeting lasted well past midnight, so it isn't like the Senate was taking the easy route. Also, there definitely weren't the votes to suspend the bylaws, but it was argued that the constitution over-ruled them.

Winter 2009 ASUCD Election

BrentLaabs — 2009-03-01 18:26:58

Differences for Winter 2009 ASUCD Election

Deletions are marked with - .	Additions are marked with +.
Line 257:	Line 257:
	+ * Yeah, well the fact that the candidates were seated without suspending the bylaws was probably unconstitutional. At least in every case before the ASUCD court in the past, swearing in was held up pending the case's resolution. As usual, the Senate took the expedient course, but they're really just inspiring real court litigation.

Winter 2009 ASUCD Election

MatthewShannon — 2009-03-01 15:35:11

Differences for Winter 2009 ASUCD Election

Deletions are marked with - .	Additions are marked with +.
Line 256:	Line 256:
	+ I was speaking in a recent context. In the 3 years I have been working in ASUCD, there hasn't been any complaint against the committee, but many against candidates. (Though the Harney one happened my freshmen year, it does change the unusual nature of the complaint)

Winter 2009 ASUCD Election

WilliamLewis — 2009-03-01 13:21:33

(quick edit)

Differences for Winter 2009 ASUCD Election

Deletions are marked with - .	Additions are marked with +.
Line 255:	Line 255:
	+ There is nothing unusual about the complaint being against the election committee. You've never heard of Harney v. Leathers, Mercy et al. v. Elections Committee, and Van Schoelandt v. Elections Committee? ALL the elections cases that I know of thus far have been lawsuits against the elections committee. --["wl"]

Winter 2009 ASUCD Election

RyanMeyerhoff — 2009-03-01 12:38:28

Comment added.

Differences for Winter 2009 ASUCD Election

Deletions are marked with - .	Additions are marked with +.
Line 255:	Line 255:
	+ ------ + ''2009-03-01 12:38:28'' [[nbsp]] I concur with the above comment. This is not a typical complaint filed against a candidate for which the Elections Committee can defer a decision to SJA. This is a complaint against the committee itself, and as per the Bylaws is sent to SJA. (speaking frankly, I do not believe SJA should have jurisdiction over any complaints against the Election Committee. SJA should take a no preference stance to this case as it has nothing to do with candidate misconduct). + + In either case, whatever SJA does with the complaint it will likely be appealed to the ASUCD Court (as both sides of the issue have at least 1 voice involved enough to request the appeal). --["Users/RyanMeyerhoff"]

Winter 2009 ASUCD Election

MatthewShannon — 2009-03-01 01:28:16

Differences for Winter 2009 ASUCD Election

Deletions are marked with - .	Additions are marked with +.
Line 253:	Line 253:
	+ + That may be the case if it were a complaint against a candidate. Unusually, this complaint is against the Elections Committee itself and as such follows a different procedure.

Winter 2009 ASUCD Election

StevenLee — 2009-02-28 21:20:27

Comment added.

Differences for Winter 2009 ASUCD Election

Deletions are marked with - .	Additions are marked with +.
Line 251:	Line 251:
	+ ------ + ''2009-02-28 21:20:27'' [[nbsp]] the way i read the bylaws is that the elections committee has original jurisdiction over election matters aka they make the initial rulings. The elections committee however can defer that to SJA and thereby take their recommendation. Where the court would come in is if someone were to object to the decision the elections committee made via its deference to SJA. From my understanding this is not a case where the elections committee made a decision and then someone challenged it at SJA. Rather the initial decision which is under the jurisidction of the elections committee has merely been deferred to SJA upon the elections committee request. If however someone does not like that decision, a person can appeal to the court, but the court can only make judgments about the rule of law which the elections committee must follow as precedence. Regardless...I find this a pretty interesting legal question. --["Users/StevenLee"]

Winter 2009 ASUCD Election

MatthewShannon — 2009-02-28 19:03:12

Differences for Winter 2009 ASUCD Election

Deletions are marked with - .	Additions are marked with +.
Line 249:	Line 249:
	+ + I would disagree, the Bylaws merely say the complaint is sent to SJA and gives SJA no power over the complaint or the Elections Committee itself. The ASUCD Court, however, is the body which empowered by the constitution to make a ruling on this complaint. I see the sending of the complain to SJA as a way to check for ethics violations that potentially result in disciplinary probation.

Winter 2009 ASUCD Election

RyanMeyerhoff — 2009-02-28 18:43:53

(quick edit)

Differences for Winter 2009 ASUCD Election

Deletions are marked with - .	Additions are marked with +.
Line 248:	Line 248:
- So, for now, the newly elected ASUCD Senators hold their office while SJA makes a decision as per the complaint and it gets appealed to the ASUCD Court for them to make a final verdict. --["Users/RyanMeyerhoff"]	+ So, for now, the newly elected ASUCD Senators hold their office while SJA makes a decision as per the complaint and it gets appealed to the ASUCD Court for them to make a final verdict. (assuming SJA's decision is appealed to the court) --["Users/RyanMeyerhoff"]

Winter 2009 ASUCD Election

RyanMeyerhoff — 2009-02-28 18:42:13

(quick edit)

Differences for Winter 2009 ASUCD Election

Deletions are marked with - .	Additions are marked with +.
Line 244:	Line 244:
- However, the ASUCD Court maintains appellate jurisdiction over any Elections manners and is backed in the Constitution as per Article 7, Section 2; "The ASUCD Court Shall a)Have the ultimate authority to interpret the wording of this Constitution and that of legislation enacted pursuant to this Constitution ... c) Review complaints regarding the Elections Committee or any other office or body of ASUCD;"	+ However, the ASUCD Court maintains appellate jurisdiction over any elections issues and is backed in the Constitution as per Article 7, Section 2; "The ASUCD Court Shall a)Have the ultimate authority to interpret the wording of this Constitution and that of legislation enacted pursuant to this Constitution ... c) Review complaints regarding the Elections Committee or any other office or body of ASUCD;"

Winter 2009 ASUCD Election

RyanMeyerhoff — 2009-02-28 18:41:34

Comment added.

Differences for Winter 2009 ASUCD Election

Deletions are marked with - .	Additions are marked with +.
Line 241:	Line 241:
	+ ------ + ''2009-02-28 18:41:34'' [[nbsp]] At this stage in the game SJA is reviewing the complaint filed against the Election Committee (as per the Bylaws, Chapter 4, Section 413, Subsection E; "A complaint against the Elections Committee may be filed with the Student Government Advisor and will be forwarded to Student Judicial Affairs.") + + However, the ASUCD Court maintains appellate jurisdiction over any Elections manners and is backed in the Constitution as per Article 7, Section 2; "The ASUCD Court Shall a)Have the ultimate authority to interpret the wording of this Constitution and that of legislation enacted pursuant to this Constitution ... c) Review complaints regarding the Elections Committee or any other office or body of ASUCD;" + + Point a) includes the ASUCD Student Bill of Rights, which is what I believe to be cited as the violation committed by the Elections Committee in the filed complaint. Point c) gives the ASUCD Court the final say on any election issues and overrules any decision by SJA. + + So, for now, the newly elected ASUCD Senators hold their office while SJA makes a decision as per the complaint and it gets appealed to the ASUCD Court for them to make a final verdict. --["Users/RyanMeyerhoff"]

Winter 2009 ASUCD Election

RyanMeyerhoff — 2009-02-28 18:10:38

(quick edit)

Differences for Winter 2009 ASUCD Election

Deletions are marked with - .	Additions are marked with +.
Line 1:	Line 1:
- The '''["Winter"] ["2009"] ["ASUCD Elections" ASUCD Election]''' occurred. The dates of the general election were Wednesday February 18th and Thursday 19th, 2009. Polls officially open at 8 AM on Wednesday February 18th and polls officially close at 11:30 AM* on Friday February 20th, 2009. ["ASUCD"] members can cast their vote at [http://elections.ucdavis.edu] 'or at one of the polling stations managed by the ASUCD Elections Committee. The announcement of election results will be held at the ["Memorial Union"] Patio at Noon.	+ The '''["Winter"] ["2009"] ["ASUCD Elections" ASUCD Election]''' occurred. The dates of the general election were Wednesday February 18th and Thursday 19th, 2009. Polls officially open at 8 AM on Wednesday February 18th and polls officially close at 11:30 AM* on Friday February 20th, 2009. ["ASUCD"] members cast their vote at [http://elections.ucdavis.edu] 'or at one of the polling stations managed by the ASUCD Elections Committee. The announcement of election results were held at the ["Memorial Union"] Patio at Noon.

Winter 2009 ASUCD Election

RyanMeyerhoff — 2009-02-28 18:09:22

(quick edit)

Differences for Winter 2009 ASUCD Election

Deletions are marked with - .	Additions are marked with +.
Line 1:	Line 1:
- The '''["Winter"] ["2009"] ["ASUCD Elections" ASUCD Election]''' occured. The dates of the general election were Wednesday February 18th and Thursday 19th, 2009. Polls officially open at 8 AM on Wednesday February 18th and polls officially close at 11:30 AM* on Friday February 20th, 2009. ["ASUCD"] members can cast their vote at [http://elections.ucdavis.edu] 'or at one of the polling stations managed by the ASUCD Elections Committee. The announcement of election results will be held at the ["Memorial Union"] Patio at Noon.	+ The '''["Winter"] ["2009"] ["ASUCD Elections" ASUCD Election]''' occurred. The dates of the general election were Wednesday February 18th and Thursday 19th, 2009. Polls officially open at 8 AM on Wednesday February 18th and polls officially close at 11:30 AM* on Friday February 20th, 2009. ["ASUCD"] members can cast their vote at [http://elections.ucdavis.edu] 'or at one of the polling stations managed by the ASUCD Elections Committee. The announcement of election results will be held at the ["Memorial Union"] Patio at Noon.

Winter 2009 ASUCD Election

RyanMeyerhoff — 2009-02-28 18:09:07

(quick edit)

Differences for Winter 2009 ASUCD Election

Deletions are marked with - .	Additions are marked with +.
Line 1:	Line 1:
- The '''["Winter"] ["2009"] ["ASUCD Elections" ASUCD Election]''' are coming. The dates of the general election are Wednesday February 18th and Thursday 19th, 2009. Polls officially open at 8 AM on Wednesday February 18th and polls officially close at 11:30 AM* on Friday February 20th, 2009. ["ASUCD"] members can cast their vote at [http://elections.ucdavis.edu] 'or at one of the polling stations managed by the ASUCD Elections Committee. The announcement of election results will be held at the ["Memorial Union"] Patio at Noon.	+ The '''["Winter"] ["2009"] ["ASUCD Elections" ASUCD Election]''' occured. The dates of the general election were Wednesday February 18th and Thursday 19th, 2009. Polls officially open at 8 AM on Wednesday February 18th and polls officially close at 11:30 AM* on Friday February 20th, 2009. ["ASUCD"] members can cast their vote at [http://elections.ucdavis.edu] 'or at one of the polling stations managed by the ASUCD Elections Committee. The announcement of election results will be held at the ["Memorial Union"] Patio at Noon.

Winter 2009 ASUCD Election

AmanpreetSingh — 2009-02-27 13:46:11

Differences for Winter 2009 ASUCD Election

No differences found!

Winter 2009 ASUCD Election

AmanpreetSingh — 2009-02-27 13:46:08

Differences for Winter 2009 ASUCD Election

Deletions are marked with - .	Additions are marked with +.
Line 151:	Line 151:
- * Despite the previous statement, the Senators were in fact sworn in, by a unanimous vote, on February 26.	+ * Despite the previous statement, the Senators were in fact sworn in with no objections, on February 26, 2009. Senator ["Mo Torres"] motioned to make an objection to the swearing in, but did not make his motion in time for the presiding officer, Vice President ["Molly Fluet"], to honor it as per Robert's Rules of Order. The Winter 2009 senators were sworn in because the ["ASUCD Constitution"] states that they must be sworn in one week after the election ends, at the next ASUCD Senate meeting.

Winter 2009 ASUCD Election

BrentLaabs — 2009-02-27 00:32:17

crisis averted... for now

Differences for Winter 2009 ASUCD Election

Deletions are marked with - .	Additions are marked with +.
Line 151:	Line 151:
-	+ * Despite the previous statement, the Senators were in fact sworn in, by a unanimous vote, on February 26.

Winter 2009 ASUCD Election

ChrisDietrich — 2009-02-26 22:42:56

response to Jenni

Differences for Winter 2009 ASUCD Election

Deletions are marked with - .	Additions are marked with +.
Line 240:	Line 240:
	+ * Also, just a brief note about ASUCD elections, ASUCD runs on an instant run-off election system, meaning that the run-off is instantaneous in the event that a majority of voters casting a ballot is not recieved. When the election was run with this system a majority went to Chatham Dietrich and is therefore valid under the elections system. There are no provisions for a separate run-off election. - ["Chris Dietrich"]

Winter 2009 ASUCD Election

BrentLaabs — 2009-02-26 17:54:02

reply to Jenni + obscure ASUCD history

Differences for Winter 2009 ASUCD Election

Deletions are marked with - .	Additions are marked with +.
Line 239:	Line 239:
	+ * I think the problem here is not the fact that the results should be challenged -- they probably should. I think it has more to do with the way that such results should be challenged. The proper venues are the judicial branch of ASUCD: the ["ASUCD Court"] and the ["Campus Judicial Board"]. This whole petition circulating about getting a revote is just clouding the issue that should be judged in court on the basis of facts, not rampant anger and gossip. Lets not forget the first time that ASUCD had a revote forced by petition, people overwhelmingly thought it was malicious; the revote was a resounding victory for ["Horace Hampton"]. If the angry part of LEAD continues on the current tack, they could end up reducing the party's stature for the next two to three years. --["Users/BrentLaabs"]

Winter 2009 ASUCD Election

Jenni — 2009-02-26 16:07:55

Comment added.

Differences for Winter 2009 ASUCD Election

Deletions are marked with - .	Additions are marked with +.
Line 238:	Line 238:
- ''2009-02-26 16:07:42'' [[nbsp]] With a margin as small as 13, there is no way a run-off could be denied, especially with the site being down and the results leaking for so long. I am usually not a LEAD sympathizer at all however in this case, there is actually a pretty strong legal case here. And this is coming from a King Hall Law Student. At the very least, elections are finally being challenged. I have been at Davis long enough to see corrupt ASUCD Elections go unchallenged, its about time somebody said something. --["Users/Jenni"]	+ ''2009-02-26 16:07:55'' [[nbsp]] With a margin as small as 13, there is no way a run-off could be denied, especially with the site being down and the results leaking for so long. I am usually not a LEAD sympathizer at all however in this case, there is actually a pretty strong legal case here. And this is coming from a King Hall Law Student. At the very least, elections are finally being challenged. I have been at Davis long enough to see corrupt ASUCD Elections go unchallenged, its about time somebody said something. --["Users/Jenni"]

Winter 2009 ASUCD Election

Jenni — 2009-02-26 16:07:42

Comment added.

Differences for Winter 2009 ASUCD Election

Deletions are marked with - .	Additions are marked with +.
Line 237:	Line 237:
	+ ------ + ''2009-02-26 16:07:42'' [[nbsp]] With a margin as small as 13, there is no way a run-off could be denied, especially with the site being down and the results leaking for so long. I am usually not a LEAD sympathizer at all however in this case, there is actually a pretty strong legal case here. And this is coming from a King Hall Law Student. At the very least, elections are finally being challenged. I have been at Davis long enough to see corrupt ASUCD Elections go unchallenged, its about time somebody said something. --["Users/Jenni"]

Winter 2009 ASUCD Election

GregWebb — 2009-02-26 15:31:23

Differences for Winter 2009 ASUCD Election

Deletions are marked with - .	Additions are marked with +.
Line 123:	Line 123:
- [[Image(computerlab.jpg, right, thumbnail, "Did voters leave their flyers behind or were they planted? Many computers in the computer labs had the Aggie + flyer. However, this could have been planted by the person taking the photo.")]]	+ [[Image(computerlab.jpg, right, thumbnail, "Did voters leave their flyers behind or were they planted by LEAD, or perhaps anti-LEAD?")]]

Winter 2009 ASUCD Election

JoePomidor — 2009-02-26 15:20:55

(quick edit)

Differences for Winter 2009 ASUCD Election

Deletions are marked with - .	Additions are marked with +.
Line 143:	Line 143:
- * A false emergency call placed to the UC Davis Police department, reporting LEAD candidates for campaigning in front of the library stating that they were harassing him. Some are claiming this call was placed by ["Greg Webb"] however, there is not evidence nor has anyone making this claim come forward to explain why they have accused Webb of placing such a call.	+ * A false emergency call placed to the UC Davis Police department, reporting LEAD candidates for campaigning in front of the library and harassment. Some are claiming this call was placed by ["Greg Webb"] however, there is not evidence nor has anyone making this claim come forward to explain why they have accused Webb of placing such a call.

Winter 2009 ASUCD Election

GregWebb — 2009-02-26 15:16:16

Differences for Winter 2009 ASUCD Election

Deletions are marked with - .	Additions are marked with +.
Line 143:	Line 143:
- * Greg Webb placing a false emergency call to the UC Davis Police department, reporting LEAD candidates for campaigning in front of the library stating that they were harassing him.	+ * A false emergency call placed to the UC Davis Police department, reporting LEAD candidates for campaigning in front of the library stating that they were harassing him. Some are claiming this call was placed by ["Greg Webb"] however, there is not evidence nor has anyone making this claim come forward to explain why they have accused Webb of placing such a call.

Winter 2009 ASUCD Election

GregWebb — 2009-02-26 15:10:15

Differences for Winter 2009 ASUCD Election

Deletions are marked with - .	Additions are marked with +.
Line 144:	Line 144:
- * I would not abuse emergency systems and this claim is baseless. - ["Greg Webb"]	+ * I would not abuse emergency systems and this claim is baseless. Assuming that I would place an emergency call because of a silly election is insulting and an attack on my character. Sure I wanted Joe to win but I would not resort to tactics that would endanger the lives of others or break any rules. Whoever is making such allegations should contact me before they start make such allegations public because that is just disgusting. - ["Greg Webb"]

Winter 2009 ASUCD Election

GregWebb — 2009-02-26 15:01:08

response to allegations

Differences for Winter 2009 ASUCD Election

Deletions are marked with - .	Additions are marked with +.
Line 144:	Line 144:
	+ * I would not abuse emergency systems and this claim is baseless. - ["Greg Webb"]
Line 145:	Line 146:
	+ * True, though the "illegal accessing" wasn't illegal at all and other people did the same. - ["Greg Webb"]

Winter 2009 ASUCD Election

GregWebb — 2009-02-26 14:57:21

Comment added.

Differences for Winter 2009 ASUCD Election

Deletions are marked with - .	Additions are marked with +.
Line 231:	Line 231:
	+ ------ + ''2009-02-26 14:57:21'' [[nbsp]] Regarding the police thing, I want it to be clear to anyone reading that I would not call the police for a non-emergency. I heard about the incident from Brent Abelson, who was canvassing for Previn Witana. Y'all can keep claiming I called the cops but that's just something I would not do. There was no illegal accessing of the elections website. + + I'm not going to get into an edit war, but the difference between allegations against me and allegations against others is that I address them here. I invite others to do the same so we as a community do not misinform. --["Users/GregWebb"]

Winter 2009 ASUCD Election

jsogul — 2009-02-26 14:35:38

Differences for Winter 2009 ASUCD Election

Deletions are marked with - .	Additions are marked with +.
Line 230:	Line 230:
- ''2009-02-26 14:34:46'' [[nbsp]] Regarding the police involvement at Shields - UCDPD received a call around 10:30 p.m. on Feb. 19 regarding some angry protestors. Officers were sent to the scene, but no action was taken and no police report was filed. I confirmed this with UCDPD this afternoon. --["Users/jsogul"]	+ ''2009-02-26 14:34:46'' [[nbsp]] Regarding the police involvement at Shields - UCDPD received a call around 10:30 p.m. on Feb. 19 regarding "some angry protestors." Officers were sent to the scene, but no action was taken and no police report was filed. I confirmed this with UCDPD this afternoon. --["Users/jsogul"]

Winter 2009 ASUCD Election

jsogul — 2009-02-26 14:34:46

Comment added.

Differences for Winter 2009 ASUCD Election

Deletions are marked with - .	Additions are marked with +.
Line 229:	Line 229:
	+ ------ + ''2009-02-26 14:34:46'' [[nbsp]] Regarding the police involvement at Shields - UCDPD received a call around 10:30 p.m. on Feb. 19 regarding some angry protestors. Officers were sent to the scene, but no action was taken and no police report was filed. I confirmed this with UCDPD this afternoon. --["Users/jsogul"]

Winter 2009 ASUCD Election

AndrewBianchi — 2009-02-26 14:23:31

Revert to version 158 (allegation is as valid as the others...).

Differences for Winter 2009 ASUCD Election

Deletions are marked with - .	Additions are marked with +.
Line 138:	Line 138:
-	+ * ACT Chief of Staff, ["Gianni"], going door-to-door in upper-classman Student Housing (the colleges), handing out flyers and condoms.

Winter 2009 ASUCD Election

TheUnicorn — 2009-02-26 14:20:59

(quick edit)

Differences for Winter 2009 ASUCD Election

Deletions are marked with - .	Additions are marked with +.
Line 138:	Line 138:
- * ACT Chief of Staff, ["Gianni"], going door-to-door in upper-classman Student Housing (the colleges), handing out flyers and condoms.	+

Winter 2009 ASUCD Election

AndrewBianchi — 2009-02-26 14:19:34

Differences for Winter 2009 ASUCD Election

Deletions are marked with - .	Additions are marked with +.
Line 123:	Line 123:
- [[Image(computerlab.jpg, right, thumbnail, "Did voters leave their flyers behind or were they planted? Many computers in the computer labs had the Aggie + flyer.")]]	+ [[Image(computerlab.jpg, right, thumbnail, "Did voters leave their flyers behind or were they planted? Many computers in the computer labs had the Aggie + flyer. However, this could have been planted by the person taking the photo.")]]
Line 127:	Line 127:
	+ + Be advised. So far, most of these are unsubstantiated rumors. Until proof is provided on here in the form of picture-evidence or documented violations of election codes or the law.
Line 133:	Line 135:
	+ + ACT allegedly engaged in scandals as they tried to secure more votes for their candidates and the Chatham Camp. + These incidences include: + * ACT Chief of Staff, ["Gianni"], going door-to-door in upper-classman Student Housing (the colleges), handing out flyers and condoms. + * ACT Senate Candidates, Justin Gold and Will Klein handing out Condoms with ACT flyers inside the ARC near the computer voting station wearing ASUCD Election t-shirts, possibly meaning to misrepresent themselves as unbiased poll workers. (Confirmed, 1 violation assessed to Justin Gold) + + Random people allegedly engaged in scandals as they tried to secure more votes for the Chatham Camp. + These incidences include: + * Greg Webb placing a false emergency call to the UC Davis Police department, reporting LEAD candidates for campaigning in front of the library stating that they were harassing him. + * Greg Webb referred to SJA for illegally accessing the ASUCD election website throughout the duration of the election.

Winter 2009 ASUCD Election

GregWebb — 2009-02-26 13:42:08

I didn't call the police, haha is that what they're saying now?

Differences for Winter 2009 ASUCD Election

Deletions are marked with - .	Additions are marked with +.
Line 132:	Line 132:
- * Alleged harassment of students by LEAD supporters/candidates at the Shields Library which ended with police involvement after opponent ["Greg Webb"] called the police	+ * Alleged harassment of students by LEAD supporters/candidates at the Shields Library which ended with police involvement.

Winter 2009 ASUCD Election

BrentLaabs — 2009-02-26 13:40:17

Darth Steve has taught you well, now the apprentice has become the master

Differences for Winter 2009 ASUCD Election

Deletions are marked with - .	Additions are marked with +.
Line 126:	Line 126:
- February 19th Noonish : Word is out that the results have been leaking and upon discovering a deficit of 300+ votes to Joe Chatham, LEAD kicks their campaign into full gear. LEAD allegedly engaged in scandals as they tried to secure more votes for Lula and Rebecca.	+ February 19th Noonish : Word is out that the results have been leaking to both the LEAD and Chatham camps. Both sides ramp up campaigning activities, much to the annoyance of everyone not running for office. + + LEAD allegedly engaged in scandals as they tried to secure more votes for Lula and Rebecca.
Line 130:	Line 132:
- * Alleged harassment of students by LEAD supporters/candidates at the Shields Library which ended with police involvement	+ * Alleged harassment of students by LEAD supporters/candidates at the Shields Library which ended with police involvement after opponent ["Greg Webb"] called the police

Winter 2009 ASUCD Election

GregWebb — 2009-02-26 13:33:09

Revert to version 153.

Differences for Winter 2009 ASUCD Election

Deletions are marked with - .	Additions are marked with +.
Line 126:	Line 126:
- February 19th Noonish : Word is out that the results have been leaking and upon discovering a deficit of 300+ votes to Joe Chatham, LEAD kicks their campaign into full gear.	+ February 19th Noonish : Word is out that the results have been leaking and upon discovering a deficit of 300+ votes to Joe Chatham, LEAD kicks their campaign into full gear. LEAD allegedly engaged in scandals as they tried to secure more votes for Lula and Rebecca. + These incidences include: + * Flyer distribution at computer labs, in violation of the ASUCD Election Codes + * Listserv abuse by a unit director https://listproc.ucdavis.edu/archives-secure/cccn/log0902/0008.html + * Alleged harassment of students by LEAD supporters/candidates at the Shields Library which ended with police involvement

Winter 2009 ASUCD Election

HannahReff — 2009-02-26 10:42:21

Differences for Winter 2009 ASUCD Election

Deletions are marked with - .	Additions are marked with +.
Line 126:	Line 126:
- February 19th Noonish : Word is out that the results have been leaking and upon discovering a deficit of 300+ votes to Joe Chatham, LEAD kicks their campaign into full gear. LEAD allegedly engaged in scandals as they tried to secure more votes for Lula and Rebecca. - These incidences include: - * Flyer distribution at computer labs, in violation of the ASUCD Election Codes - * Listserv abuse by a unit director https://listproc.ucdavis.edu/archives-secure/cccn/log0902/0008.html - * Alleged harassment of students by LEAD supporters/candidates at the Shields Library which ended with police involvement	+ February 19th Noonish : Word is out that the results have been leaking and upon discovering a deficit of 300+ votes to Joe Chatham, LEAD kicks their campaign into full gear.

Winter 2009 ASUCD Election

BrentLaabs — 2009-02-26 02:37:26

Comment added.

Differences for Winter 2009 ASUCD Election

Deletions are marked with - .	Additions are marked with +.
Line 213:	Line 213:
	+ ------ + ''2009-02-26 02:37:26'' [[nbsp]] Wow, that is a little known fact. Personally, I can see why you opposed it -- it only gives the illusion of rights. I doubt any court case will stick based on its vague language. --["Users/BrentLaabs"]

Winter 2009 ASUCD Election

PaulAmnuaypayoat — 2009-02-26 01:21:51

reply to Brent

Differences for Winter 2009 ASUCD Election

Deletions are marked with - .	Additions are marked with +.
Line 211:	Line 211:
- * My intelligence says that LEAD is not united on these elections complaints. Also, I'm guessing that this has to do with Clause 6 of the Student Bill of Rights ("You have the right to a fair vote in all ASUCD elections without any form of disenfranchisement. All ASUCD elections shall be fair and proper as outlined in the ASUCD elections codes."), though I haven't seen the complaint. So basically, we have you [Paul] to thank for bringing back the Student Bill of Rights! --["Users/BrentLaabs"]	+ * My intelligence says that ["LEAD"] is not united on these elections complaints. Also, I'm guessing that this has to do with Clause 6 of the ["Student Bill of Rights"] ("You have the right to a fair vote in all ["ASUCD"] elections without any form of disenfranchisement. All ["ASUCD"] elections shall be fair and proper as outlined in the ["ASUCD"] elections codes."), though I haven't seen the complaint. So basically, we have you ["Paul Amnuaypayoat" Paul] to thank for bringing back the ["Student Bill of Rights"]! --["Users/BrentLaabs"] + * Well, actually, the thanks should go to my friend ["Rawi Nanakul" Rawi] who actually filed the court case against the ["SGAO"] for losing it in the first place. Little known fact: I was actually the leader of the opposition campaign against the ["Student Bill of Rights" Bill of Rights] during the election in which it was approved by the students, and had I been successful, this current ["Student Judicial Affairs" SJA] complaint might not be possible today. - ["Paul Amnuaypayoat"]

Winter 2009 ASUCD Election

BrentLaabs — 2009-02-26 01:01:16

all i know for now

Differences for Winter 2009 ASUCD Election

Deletions are marked with - .	Additions are marked with +.
Line 211:	Line 211:
	+ * My intelligence says that LEAD is not united on these elections complaints. Also, I'm guessing that this has to do with Clause 6 of the Student Bill of Rights ("You have the right to a fair vote in all ASUCD elections without any form of disenfranchisement. All ASUCD elections shall be fair and proper as outlined in the ASUCD elections codes."), though I haven't seen the complaint. So basically, we have you [Paul] to thank for bringing back the Student Bill of Rights! --["Users/BrentLaabs"]

Winter 2009 ASUCD Election

PaulAmnuaypayoat — 2009-02-26 00:50:41

Comment added.

Differences for Winter 2009 ASUCD Election

Deletions are marked with - .	Additions are marked with +.
Line 209:	Line 209:
	+ ------ + ''2009-02-26 00:50:41'' [[nbsp]] Well, it looks like ["LEAD"] has become as corrupt as their former ["Student Focus" rivals] now that they have become the most powerful people in ["ASUCD"]. It is good to see that everyone still keeps things exciting over there. By the way, regarding the complaint that Reynaldo Rodriguez filed, who exactly is he filing the complaint against? In other words, which individual(s) does he allege did the wrongdoing, and what exactly was that wrongdoing? --["Users/PaulAmnuaypayoat"]

Winter 2009 ASUCD Election

jsogul — 2009-02-25 22:17:29

Differences for Winter 2009 ASUCD Election

Deletions are marked with - .	Additions are marked with +.
Line 134:	Line 134:
- On Wednesday February 25th, a complaint was filed by Raynaldo Rodriguez alleging voter disenfranchisement and a violation of the ASUCD Bill of Rights. This complaint was referred to SJA and they will be discussing it next week. Because of this new Senators will not be able to be sworn in at the February 26th Senate Meeting.	+ On Wednesday February 25th, a complaint was filed by Reynaldo Rodriguez alleging voter disenfranchisement and a violation of the ASUCD Bill of Rights. This complaint was referred to SJA and they will be discussing it next week. Because of this new Senators will not be able to be sworn in at the February 26th Senate Meeting.

Winter 2009 ASUCD Election

ChrisDietrich — 2009-02-25 21:39:19

added the complaint

Differences for Winter 2009 ASUCD Election

Deletions are marked with - .	Additions are marked with +.
Line 134:	Line 134:
	+ On Wednesday February 25th, a complaint was filed by Raynaldo Rodriguez alleging voter disenfranchisement and a violation of the ASUCD Bill of Rights. This complaint was referred to SJA and they will be discussing it next week. Because of this new Senators will not be able to be sworn in at the February 26th Senate Meeting. +

Winter 2009 ASUCD Election

GregWebb — 2009-02-23 16:17:32

Differences for Winter 2009 ASUCD Election

Deletions are marked with - .	Additions are marked with +.
Line 123:	Line 123:
	+ [[Image(computerlab.jpg, right, thumbnail, "Did voters leave their flyers behind or were they planted? Many computers in the computer labs had the Aggie + flyer.")]]

Winter 2009 ASUCD Election

GregWebb — 2009-02-23 16:14:51

Upload of image computerlab.jpg.

Winter 2009 ASUCD Election

GregWebb — 2009-02-23 16:11:50

There's a lot to add onto it.

Differences for Winter 2009 ASUCD Election

Deletions are marked with - .	Additions are marked with +.
Line 122:	Line 122:
	+ =Timeline of Events and Scandals= + + February 18th 8:00 AM : Voting Begins + February 19th Noonish : Word is out that the results have been leaking and upon discovering a deficit of 300+ votes to Joe Chatham, LEAD kicks their campaign into full gear. LEAD allegedly engaged in scandals as they tried to secure more votes for Lula and Rebecca. + These incidences include: + * Flyer distribution at computer labs, in violation of the ASUCD Election Codes + * Listserv abuse by a unit director https://listproc.ucdavis.edu/archives-secure/cccn/log0902/0008.html + * Alleged harassment of students by LEAD supporters/candidates at the Shields Library which ended with police involvement + + On the night of Thursday February 19th, the ASUCD Elections page was defunct due to a login system failure. This potentially silenced voters and because of it voting was extended until 11:30 the next morning. +

Winter 2009 ASUCD Election

WilliamLewis — 2009-02-21 15:47:44

+ a proper sig.

Differences for Winter 2009 ASUCD Election

Deletions are marked with - .	Additions are marked with +.
Line 194:	Line 194:
- *It's also unlikely that votes got dropped from the system because we can see from the official report that 6142 voters logged in and exactly that number either voted for one of the tickets or selected the "no preference" button (2839+2826+477=6142). We could tell if votes had been dropped because the number of "Confirmers abstaining in this contest" would be off. --["Nick Sidney"]	+ *It's also unlikely that votes got dropped from the system because we can see from the official report that 6142 voters logged in and exactly that number either voted for one of the tickets or selected the "no preference" button (2839+2826+477=6142). We could tell if votes had been dropped because the number of "Confirmers abstaining in this contest" would be off. --["Users/nsidney" Nick Sidney]

Winter 2009 ASUCD Election

nsidney — 2009-02-21 13:15:30

comment

Differences for Winter 2009 ASUCD Election

Deletions are marked with - .	Additions are marked with +.
Line 194:	Line 194:
	+ *It's also unlikely that votes got dropped from the system because we can see from the official report that 6142 voters logged in and exactly that number either voted for one of the tickets or selected the "no preference" button (2839+2826+477=6142). We could tell if votes had been dropped because the number of "Confirmers abstaining in this contest" would be off. --["Nick Sidney"]

Winter 2009 ASUCD Election

WilliamLewis — 2009-02-21 12:34:16

Differences for Winter 2009 ASUCD Election

Deletions are marked with - .	Additions are marked with +.
Line 193:	Line 193:
- The first number is the number of votes you got. The second number is the number of votes your opponents got. This matches the official count. Just about the only problem that could creep in here is if the voting system silently dropped ballots and some didn't get recorded. The election is close enough that such a thing might have made a difference. You won by 0.2% of the vote. However, this is unlikely. - --["wl"]	+ The first number is the number of votes you got. The second number is the number of votes your opponents got. This matches the official count. Just about the only problem that could creep in here is if the voting system silently dropped ballots and some didn't get recorded. The election is close enough that such a thing might have made a difference. You won by 0.2% of the vote. However, this is unlikely. --["wl"]

Winter 2009 ASUCD Election

WilliamLewis — 2009-02-21 12:33:52

Differences for Winter 2009 ASUCD Election

Deletions are marked with - .	Additions are marked with +.
Line 187:	Line 187:
- * Well, the only real way to do a recount would be to run the ballots through the ballot reading software again. There is a 99.99% chance that this will not change anything though because they are electronic ballots and there is no real way for them to be counted incorrectly. All the ballot files are available at [http://elections.ucdavis.edu] and you can run them yourself to verify the results. And for reference there is no provision in the bylaws or constitution for a recount. So all this will unnecessarily prolong the election and prevent Joe and I from taking our seats. -["Chris Dietrich"] - It would be hella ironic if the LEAD challenge goes the way of the Winter 2001 elections. --["wl"]	+ * Well, the only real way to do a recount would be to run the ballots through the ballot reading software again. There is a 99.99% chance that this will not change anything though because they are electronic ballots and there is no real way for them to be counted incorrectly. All the ballot files are available at [http://elections.ucdavis.edu] and you can run them yourself to verify the results. And for reference there is no provision in the bylaws or constitution for a recount. So all this will unnecessarily prolong the election and prevent Joe and I from taking our seats. -["Chris Dietrich"] + *It would be hella ironic if the LEAD challenge goes the way of the Winter 2001 elections. There is a real way, however, for the ballots to be counted incorrectly. Pretty much all software has bugs. That being said... I did an instant recount using some different software. + % cat pres_win09.blt \| grep ^'1 1' \| wc -l + 2839 + % cat pres_win09.blt \| grep ^'1 2' \| wc -l + 2826 + The first number is the number of votes you got. The second number is the number of votes your opponents got. This matches the official count. Just about the only problem that could creep in here is if the voting system silently dropped ballots and some didn't get recorded. The election is close enough that such a thing might have made a difference. You won by 0.2% of the vote. However, this is unlikely. + --["wl"]

Winter 2009 ASUCD Election

WilliamLewis — 2009-02-21 12:23:50

(quick edit)

Differences for Winter 2009 ASUCD Election

Deletions are marked with - .	Additions are marked with +.
Line 188:	Line 188:
- It would be hella ironic if the LEAD challenge goes the way of the Winter 2001 elections. --["wl"]	+ It would be hella ironic if the LEAD challenge goes the way of the Winter 2001 elections. --["wl"]

Winter 2009 ASUCD Election

WilliamLewis — 2009-02-21 12:23:40

(quick edit)

Differences for Winter 2009 ASUCD Election

Deletions are marked with - .	Additions are marked with +.
Line 188:	Line 188:
	+ It would be hella ironic if the LEAD challenge goes the way of the Winter 2001 elections. --["wl"]

Winter 2009 ASUCD Election

ChrisDietrich — 2009-02-21 12:01:21

comment added

Differences for Winter 2009 ASUCD Election

Deletions are marked with - .	Additions are marked with +.
Line 187:	Line 187:
	+ * Well, the only real way to do a recount would be to run the ballots through the ballot reading software again. There is a 99.99% chance that this will not change anything though because they are electronic ballots and there is no real way for them to be counted incorrectly. All the ballot files are available at [http://elections.ucdavis.edu] and you can run them yourself to verify the results. And for reference there is no provision in the bylaws or constitution for a recount. So all this will unnecessarily prolong the election and prevent Joe and I from taking our seats. -["Chris Dietrich"]

Winter 2009 ASUCD Election

ChrisDietrich — 2009-02-21 01:38:32

this makes more sense as a footnote...

Differences for Winter 2009 ASUCD Election

Deletions are marked with - .	Additions are marked with +.
Line 11:	Line 11:
- * Joe Chatham and Chris Dietrich, who won in the official tally by only thirteen votes. Election complaints to call for a recount are already under way.	+ * Joe Chatham and Chris Dietrich[[Footnote(The official tally showed Joe and Chris winning by 13 votes. Complaints for an election recount are currently underway.)]]

Winter 2009 ASUCD Election

BrentLaabs — 2009-02-20 23:27:09

link to subpage

Differences for Winter 2009 ASUCD Election

Deletions are marked with - .	Additions are marked with +.
Line 44:	Line 44:
	+ For alternate universe results and mathematical analysis, see ["/Bizarro World"].

Winter 2009 ASUCD Election

MattBlair — 2009-02-20 19:27:36

(quick edit)

Differences for Winter 2009 ASUCD Election

Deletions are marked with - .	Additions are marked with +.
Line 19:	Line 19:
- * Kevin Massudi	+ * Kevin Massoudi

Winter 2009 ASUCD Election

ChrisDietrich — 2009-02-20 18:48:38

The tally is official.

Differences for Winter 2009 ASUCD Election

Deletions are marked with - .	Additions are marked with +.
Line 11:	Line 11:
- * Joe Chatham and Chris Dietrich, who won in the unofficial tally by only thirteen votes. Election complaints to call for a recount are already under way.	+ * Joe Chatham and Chris Dietrich, who won in the official tally by only thirteen votes. Election complaints to call for a recount are already under way.

Winter 2009 ASUCD Election

EvanChait — 2009-02-20 17:32:46

Comment added.

Differences for Winter 2009 ASUCD Election

Deletions are marked with - .	Additions are marked with +.
Line 184:	Line 184:
	+ ------ + ''2009-02-20 17:32:46'' [[nbsp]] just curious, how do you conduct a recount on this type of election? --["Users/EvanChait"]

Winter 2009 ASUCD Election

EvanChait — 2009-02-20 17:32:24

Differences for Winter 2009 ASUCD Election

Deletions are marked with - .	Additions are marked with +.
Line 184:	Line 184:
- - just curious about how you conduct a recount on an internet election? - --chait

Winter 2009 ASUCD Election

EvanChait — 2009-02-20 17:31:47

Differences for Winter 2009 ASUCD Election

Deletions are marked with - .	Additions are marked with +.
Line 184:	Line 184:
	+ + just curious about how you conduct a recount on an internet election? + --chait

Winter 2009 ASUCD Election

nsidney — 2009-02-20 16:54:33

updated line about website outage

Differences for Winter 2009 ASUCD Election

Deletions are marked with - .	Additions are marked with +.
Line 2:	Line 2:
- *Sometime between 8 and 9 pm on Thursday, Feb. 19, 2009, the elections website went due to technical issues, so the voting deadline has been extended to compensate for the time were votes couldn't be cast.	+ *Between 6:30 pm and 10 pm on Thursday, Feb. 19, 2009, students were unable to vote because the UC Davis Central Authentication Service (the system that logs students into MyUCD, SISWEB, etc.) went down, so the voting deadline was extended to compensate for the time were votes couldn't be cast.

Winter 2009 ASUCD Election

BrianKim — 2009-02-20 16:45:04

Comment added.

Differences for Winter 2009 ASUCD Election

Deletions are marked with - .	Additions are marked with +.
Line 182:	Line 182:
	+ ------ + ''2009-02-20 16:45:04'' [[nbsp]] Congrats to Chris and Joe, I hope you guys keep up the hard work and prove that you earned this! --["Users/BrianKim"]

Winter 2009 ASUCD Election

BrentLaabs — 2009-02-20 16:40:03

+ ballot initiatives

Differences for Winter 2009 ASUCD Election

Deletions are marked with - .	Additions are marked with +.
Line 20:	Line 20:
	+ == Ballot Measures == + * ["Interviewing Committee Update Act"] - passed + * ["The Green Initiative Fund"] - failed + * ["External Representation Amendment"] - passed

Winter 2009 ASUCD Election

BrentLaabs — 2009-02-20 16:18:05

change isn't here yet

Differences for Winter 2009 ASUCD Election

Deletions are marked with - .	Additions are marked with +.
Line 11:	Line 11:
- * Joe Chatham and Chris Dietrich	+ * Joe Chatham and Chris Dietrich, who won in the unofficial tally by only thirteen votes. Election complaints to call for a recount are already under way.

Winter 2009 ASUCD Election

GregWebb — 2009-02-20 15:58:19

Comment added.

Differences for Winter 2009 ASUCD Election

Deletions are marked with - .	Additions are marked with +.
Line 176:	Line 176:
	+ ------ + ''2009-02-20 15:58:19'' [[nbsp]] CHANGE IS HERE! --["Users/GregWebb"]

Winter 2009 ASUCD Election

WilliamLewis — 2009-02-20 14:49:09

Differences for Winter 2009 ASUCD Election

Deletions are marked with - .	Additions are marked with +.
Line 7:	Line 7:
	+ + = Results= + ==Winners== + ===Executive=== + * Joe Chatham and Chris Dietrich + ===Senate=== + + * Justin Gold + * Shawdee Rouhafza + * Previn Witana + * Joemar Clemente + * Trevor Taylor + * Kevin Massudi + + == Vote distribution == + \|\| \|\|1\|\|2\|\|3\|\|4\|\|5\|\|6\|\|7\|\|8\|\|9\|\|10\|\|11\|\|12\|\|13\|\|14\|\|15\|\| + \|\|Burke Rosen\|\|222\|\|150\|\|111\|\|106\|\|80\|\|79\|\|66\|\|74\|\|76\|\|60\|\|58\|\|80\|\|83\|\|111\|\|307\|\| + \|\|Chintan Desai\|\|464\|\|337\|\|355\|\|335\|\|293\|\|242\|\|115\|\|93\|\|64\|\|86\|\|70\|\|64\|\|77\|\|66\|\|41\|\| + \|\|Elle Segal\|\|328\|\|355\|\|315\|\|277\|\|252\|\|228\|\|123\|\|89\|\|98\|\|82\|\|75\|\|58\|\|70\|\|79\|\|110\|\| + \|\|Joemar Clemente\|\|525\|\|277\|\|156\|\|156\|\|137\|\|135\|\|131\|\|97\|\|107\|\|98\|\|84\|\|91\|\|83\|\|69\|\|52\|\| + \|\|Justin Gold\|\|518\|\|446\|\|388\|\|214\|\|198\|\|139\|\|98\|\|101\|\|85\|\|69\|\|51\|\|65\|\|60\|\|65\|\|45\|\| + \|\|Kevin Massoudi\|\|442\|\|345\|\|278\|\|225\|\|156\|\|135\|\|127\|\|98\|\|94\|\|92\|\|81\|\|75\|\|95\|\|66\|\|45\|\| + \|\|Luka Vidovic\|\|65\|\|99\|\|122\|\|134\|\|117\|\|130\|\|110\|\|121\|\|132\|\|92\|\|122\|\|99\|\|99\|\|107\|\|81\|\| + \|\|Momo Newbon\|\|524\|\|406\|\|282\|\|252\|\|247\|\|172\|\|103\|\|104\|\|88\|\|92\|\|83\|\|77\|\|70\|\|79\|\|64\|\| + \|\|Previn Witana\|\|512\|\|368\|\|312\|\|279\|\|269\|\|251\|\|142\|\|90\|\|77\|\|80\|\|68\|\|74\|\|53\|\|56\|\|54\|\| + \|\|Sanwarl Li\|\|188\|\|148\|\|153\|\|137\|\|121\|\|110\|\|132\|\|126\|\|125\|\|124\|\|104\|\|101\|\|91\|\|74\|\|56\|\| + \|\|Shawdee Rouhafza\|\|477\|\|523\|\|443\|\|344\|\|269\|\|196\|\|123\|\|96\|\|69\|\|61\|\|79\|\|71\|\|67\|\|54\|\|36\|\| + \|\|Trevor Taylor\|\|465\|\|300\|\|251\|\|241\|\|235\|\|213\|\|132\|\|88\|\|77\|\|70\|\|106\|\|87\|\|92\|\|103\|\|73\|\| + \|\|Will Klein\|\|354\|\|316\|\|298\|\|212\|\|162\|\|119\|\|110\|\|107\|\|72\|\|88\|\|75\|\|82\|\|74\|\|97\|\|97\|\| + \|\|Zaana Hall\|\|287\|\|313\|\|303\|\|222\|\|174\|\|182\|\|140\|\|129\|\|110\|\|88\|\|77\|\|70\|\|71\|\|65\|\|46\|\| + \|\|Jeremia Kimelman\|\|195\|\|231\|\|219\|\|184\|\|157\|\|144\|\|105\|\|100\|\|91\|\|86\|\|82\|\|98\|\|92\|\|80\|\|58\|\| + \|\|Totals\|\|5566\|\|4614\|\|3986\|\|3318\|\|2867\|\|2475\|\|1757\|\|1513\|\|1365\|\|1268\|\|1215\|\|1192\|\|1177\|\|1171\|\|1165\|\| + + + = Details =

Winter 2009 ASUCD Election

MattBlair — 2009-02-19 22:36:05

(quick edit)

Differences for Winter 2009 ASUCD Election

Deletions are marked with - .	Additions are marked with +.
Line 2:	Line 2:
- *Sometime between 8 and 9 pm on Thursday, Feb. 19, 2009, the elections website went due to technical issues, so the the voting deadline has been extended to compensate for the time were votes couldn't be cast.	+ *Sometime between 8 and 9 pm on Thursday, Feb. 19, 2009, the elections website went due to technical issues, so the voting deadline has been extended to compensate for the time were votes couldn't be cast.

Winter 2009 ASUCD Election

MattBlair — 2009-02-19 22:34:48

website abck up, voting time extend to 11:30am

Differences for Winter 2009 ASUCD Election

Deletions are marked with - .	Additions are marked with +.
Line 1:	Line 1:
- The '''["Winter"] ["2009"] ["ASUCD Elections" ASUCD Election]''' are coming. The dates of the general election are Wednesday February 18th and Thursday 19th, 2009. Polls officially open at 8 AM on Wednesday February 18th and polls officially close at 8 AM on Friday February 20th, 2009. ["ASUCD"] members can cast their vote at [http://elections.ucdavis.edu] '''WEBSITE CURRENTLY DOWN'''or at one of the polling stations managed by the ASUCD Elections Committee. The announcement of election results will be held at the ["Memorial Union"] Patio at Noon.	+ The '''["Winter"] ["2009"] ["ASUCD Elections" ASUCD Election]''' are coming. The dates of the general election are Wednesday February 18th and Thursday 19th, 2009. Polls officially open at 8 AM on Wednesday February 18th and polls officially close at 11:30 AM* on Friday February 20th, 2009. ["ASUCD"] members can cast their vote at [http://elections.ucdavis.edu] 'or at one of the polling stations managed by the ASUCD Elections Committee. The announcement of election results will be held at the ["Memorial Union"] Patio at Noon. + *Sometime between 8 and 9 pm on Thursday, Feb. 19, 2009, the elections website went due to technical issues, so the the voting deadline has been extended to compensate for the time were votes couldn't be cast.

Winter 2009 ASUCD Election

njp — 2009-02-19 21:32:16

Differences for Winter 2009 ASUCD Election

Deletions are marked with - .	Additions are marked with +.
Line 108:	Line 108:
	+ * You are thinking of auto-aware, not autocratic. But LEAD is planning on sending robots back from the future to assassinate ACT's founders.

Winter 2009 ASUCD Election

MattBlair — 2009-02-19 20:51:17

Differences for Winter 2009 ASUCD Election

Deletions are marked with - .	Additions are marked with +.
Line 1:	Line 1:
- The '''["Winter"] ["2009"] ["ASUCD Elections" ASUCD Election]''' are coming. The dates of the general election are Wednesday February 18th and Thursday 19th, 2009. Polls officially open at 8 AM on Wednesday February 18th and polls officially close at 8 AM on Friday February 20th, 2009. ["ASUCD"] members can cast their vote at [http://elections.ucdavis.edu] or at one of the polling stations managed by the ASUCD Elections Committee. The announcement of election results will be held at the ["Memorial Union"] Patio at Noon.	+ The '''["Winter"] ["2009"] ["ASUCD Elections" ASUCD Election]''' are coming. The dates of the general election are Wednesday February 18th and Thursday 19th, 2009. Polls officially open at 8 AM on Wednesday February 18th and polls officially close at 8 AM on Friday February 20th, 2009. ["ASUCD"] members can cast their vote at [http://elections.ucdavis.edu] '''WEBSITE CURRENTLY DOWN'''or at one of the polling stations managed by the ASUCD Elections Committee. The announcement of election results will be held at the ["Memorial Union"] Patio at Noon.

Winter 2009 ASUCD Election

MatthewShannon — 2009-02-18 12:13:44

Comment

Differences for Winter 2009 ASUCD Election

Deletions are marked with - .	Additions are marked with +.
Line 138:	Line 138:
	+ *Throughout the campaign, Joe has shown very little respect to both the critiques of TGIF and to the people who say them. Despite this, there are other members of the "Yes" campaign team who have been receptive to the critiques and if they were to participate in the campaign next year, I think Davis will have a far better TGIF to vote on.

Winter 2009 ASUCD Election

PeteWillits — 2009-02-18 10:51:23

Comment added.

Differences for Winter 2009 ASUCD Election

Deletions are marked with - .	Additions are marked with +.
Line 137:	Line 137:
	+ * The Aggie editorial on TGIF said they actually liked the idea of it, they just didn't like the way it was set up. So it seems they wouldn't have a problem if Chatham reintroduced an improved version of it next year. --["Users/PeteWillits"]

Winter 2009 ASUCD Election

BrentLaabs — 2009-02-18 00:53:40

another aggie article

Differences for Winter 2009 ASUCD Election

Deletions are marked with - .	Additions are marked with +.
Line 30:	Line 30:
	+ * [http://theaggie.org/article/2745 ASUCD Elections Today]

Winter 2009 ASUCD Election

BrentLaabs — 2009-02-18 00:20:08

AGTV strikes again!

Differences for Winter 2009 ASUCD Election

Deletions are marked with - .	Additions are marked with +.
Line 4:	Line 4:
	+ + Senate Candidate television advertisements can be viewed on the [http://www.youtube.com/user/asucd ASUCD Youtube Channel].

Winter 2009 ASUCD Election

BrentLaabs — 2009-02-18 00:14:40

cen-unsure

Differences for Winter 2009 ASUCD Election

Deletions are marked with - .	Additions are marked with +.
Line 36:	Line 36:
	+ * Censure isn't actually doing something, it's just a way of pretending you're actually doing something. And we all know office hours are basically BS anyway, right?

Winter 2009 ASUCD Election

AndrewBianchi — 2009-02-17 23:57:50

Differences for Winter 2009 ASUCD Election

Deletions are marked with - .	Additions are marked with +.
Line 131:	Line 131:
- ------ - ''2009-02-17 23:43:10'' [[nbsp]] I think it's telling that Joe Chatham was able to overcome the TGIF burden and still win the Aggie endorsement. --["Users/GregWebb"]	+ * I think it's telling that Joe Chatham was able to overcome the TGIF burden and still win the Aggie endorsement. --["Users/GregWebb"] + * I think it's telling of the Aggie's analytical skills and willful ignorance to the point that Joe will likely introduce TGIF again if it doesn't pass this quarter. --["Users/AndrewBianchi"]

Winter 2009 ASUCD Election

GregWebb — 2009-02-17 23:44:39

Differences for Winter 2009 ASUCD Election

Deletions are marked with - .	Additions are marked with +.
Line 35:	Line 35:
	+ * Or censure.

Winter 2009 ASUCD Election

GregWebb — 2009-02-17 23:43:10

Comment added.

Differences for Winter 2009 ASUCD Election

Deletions are marked with - .	Additions are marked with +.
Line 130:	Line 130:
	+ ------ + ''2009-02-17 23:43:10'' [[nbsp]] I think it's telling that Joe Chatham was able to overcome the TGIF burden and still win the Aggie endorsement. --["Users/GregWebb"]

Winter 2009 ASUCD Election

AndrewBianchi — 2009-02-17 23:31:14

Differences for Winter 2009 ASUCD Election

Deletions are marked with - .	Additions are marked with +.
Line 54:	Line 54:
- ==Endorsement-like Statements== - ["Greg Webb/Winter 2009 ASUCD Endorsements" Greg Webb's endorsement-like statements] - ["Users/BrentLaabs/ASUCD Endorsements" Brent Laabs' endorsement-like statements] (alumnus) - - ===The California Aggie Endorsements===	+ ==The California Aggie Endorsements==
Line 73:	Line 69:
	+ + ===Endorsement-like Statements=== + Everyone should free to add recommendations here as you do not need to be an official representative of any club or organization, or even a student in order to issue "endorsement-like" statements! + + ["Greg Webb/Winter 2009 ASUCD Endorsements" Greg Webb's endorsement-like statements] + ["Users/BrentLaabs/ASUCD Endorsements" Brent Laabs' endorsement-like statements] (alumnus) + +

Winter 2009 ASUCD Election

Darach — 2009-02-17 23:08:07

This places all the info in a more compact and balanced format. Thanks author.

Differences for Winter 2009 ASUCD Election

Deletions are marked with - .	Additions are marked with +.
Line 3:	Line 3:
- == President/Vice President == - \|\|<rowbgcolor="#FFCCCC">["LEAD"]\|\| ["Lula Ahmed-Falol"] / ["Rebecca Schwartz"]\|\| - \|\|<rowbgcolor="#FCFCF3">["Independent"]\|\| ["Joe Chatham"] / ["Chris Dietrich"]\|\| - == Senate == - LEAD - * ["Chintan Desai"] - * ["Previn Witana"] - * ["Trevor Taylor"] - * ["Elle Segal"] - * ["Shawdee Rouhafza"] - * ["Momo Newbon" Monisha Momo Newbon ]	+ [[Include(Winter 2009 ASUCD Election/Nav)]]
Line 15:	Line 5:
- ["ACT"] [[Footnote(This is not the A.C.T. created by ["Joseph Bleckman"] and ["Greg Webb"], however it is the product of a member of the ["Theta Xi"] fraternity. This is ironic considering another Theta Xi ["Spencer Higgins"] destroyed the Bleckman/Webb A.C.T.. It is clear that the legend of A.C.T. has been circulating throughout Theta Xi for the past two years.)]] - * ["Will Klein"] - * ["Justin Gold"] - * ["Zaana Hall"] - - HEAD - * ["Sanwarl Li"] - - Independent - * ["Kevin Massoudi"] - * ["Joemar Clemente"] - * ["Burke Rosen"] - * ["Jeremia Kimelman"] - * ["Luka Vidovic"] - - - == Ballot Measures ==	+ == Ballot Measure Details ==

Winter 2009 ASUCD Election

BrentLaabs — 2009-02-17 23:03:11

Revert to version 109 (no, it's actually you who is biased).

Differences for Winter 2009 ASUCD Election

Deletions are marked with - .	Additions are marked with +.
Line 4:	Line 4:
- \|\|["LEAD"]\|\| ["Lula Ahmed-Falol"] / ["Rebecca Schwartz"]\|\| - \|\|["Independent"]\|\| ["Joe Chatham"] / ["Chris Dietrich"]\|\|	+ \|\|<rowbgcolor="#FFCCCC">["LEAD"]\|\| ["Lula Ahmed-Falol"] / ["Rebecca Schwartz"]\|\| + \|\|<rowbgcolor="#FCFCF3">["Independent"]\|\| ["Joe Chatham"] / ["Chris Dietrich"]\|\|

Winter 2009 ASUCD Election

Darach — 2009-02-17 23:00:23

Again, this is biased formatting.

Differences for Winter 2009 ASUCD Election

Deletions are marked with - .	Additions are marked with +.
Line 4:	Line 4:
- \|\|<rowbgcolor="#FFCCCC">["LEAD"]\|\| ["Lula Ahmed-Falol"] / ["Rebecca Schwartz"]\|\| - \|\|<rowbgcolor="#FCFCF3">["Independent"]\|\| ["Joe Chatham"] / ["Chris Dietrich"]\|\|	+ \|\|["LEAD"]\|\| ["Lula Ahmed-Falol"] / ["Rebecca Schwartz"]\|\| + \|\|["Independent"]\|\| ["Joe Chatham"] / ["Chris Dietrich"]\|\|

Winter 2009 ASUCD Election

AndrewBianchi — 2009-02-17 22:23:55

Comment added.

Differences for Winter 2009 ASUCD Election

Deletions are marked with - .	Additions are marked with +.
Line 150:	Line 150:
	+ ------ + ''2009-02-17 22:23:55'' [[nbsp]] It will be rather comical if Joe and Chris win on Friday and TGIF doesn't or visa versa. It was Joe's lack of leadership over the past 8 months, I believe, that lead to the poorly structured initiative. I would even wager a guess to say that he kept TGIF under his purview and away from the public in order to use it for political capital this election. If the Yes on TGIF campaign had hosted townhall-esque meetings, or had they incorporated a wider range of elected officials in it's construction, TGIF wouldn't be wrought with failure (if not elective failure, than operational). However, TGIF was written behind closed doors in such a fashion that it has now been met with great disapproval by many campus leaders, and hopefully this will be reflected in the vote. It also goes to show that while the Aggie endorsements are always a prize in ASUCD election, their quality is generally lacking. How the editorial board of the Aggie urges students to vote No on TGIF, but then contradicts themselves by recommending a vote for all it's major proponents running for ASUCD elective office boggles my mind. --["Users/AndrewBianchi"]

Winter 2009 ASUCD Election

BrentLaabs — 2009-02-17 14:03:52

beige, the new independent color

Differences for Winter 2009 ASUCD Election

Deletions are marked with - .	Additions are marked with +.
Line 5:	Line 5:
- \|\|Independent\|\| ["Joe Chatham"] / ["Chris Dietrich"]\|\|	+ \|\|<rowbgcolor="#FCFCF3">["Independent"]\|\| ["Joe Chatham"] / ["Chris Dietrich"]\|\|

Winter 2009 ASUCD Election

WilliamLewis — 2009-02-17 09:12:38

Revert to version 105 (red = lead. If StuFo and Go were still around, they'd be yellow and green.).

Differences for Winter 2009 ASUCD Election

Deletions are marked with - .	Additions are marked with +.
Line 4:	Line 4:
- \|\|["LEAD"]\|\| ["Lula Ahmed-Falol"] / ["Rebecca Schwartz"]\|\|	+ \|\|<rowbgcolor="#FFCCCC">["LEAD"]\|\| ["Lula Ahmed-Falol"] / ["Rebecca Schwartz"]\|\|

Winter 2009 ASUCD Election

ChrisDietrich — 2009-02-17 09:04:51

either give every candidate a color or no colors. it was visually unfair.

Differences for Winter 2009 ASUCD Election

Deletions are marked with - .	Additions are marked with +.
Line 4:	Line 4:
- \|\|<rowbgcolor="#FFCCCC">["LEAD"]\|\| ["Lula Ahmed-Falol"] / ["Rebecca Schwartz"]\|\|	+ \|\|["LEAD"]\|\| ["Lula Ahmed-Falol"] / ["Rebecca Schwartz"]\|\|

Winter 2009 ASUCD Election

EliYani — 2009-02-17 07:47:06

(quick edit)

Differences for Winter 2009 ASUCD Election

Deletions are marked with - .	Additions are marked with +.
Line 85:	Line 85:
- Every quarter the Aggie sits down with ASUCD candidates and decides endorses the candidates they feel are most qualified for the job. This quarter the endorsed the following candidates.	+ Every quarter the Aggie sits down with ASUCD candidates and decides endorses the candidates they feel are most qualified for the job. This quarter they endorsed the following candidates.

Winter 2009 ASUCD Election

BrentLaabs — 2009-02-17 01:55:05

missed one

Differences for Winter 2009 ASUCD Election

Deletions are marked with - .	Additions are marked with +.
Line 50:	Line 50:
- *http://theaggie.org/article/2655
Line 53:	Line 52:
	+ * [http://theaggie.org/article/2655 Steal this Column: Dirty, Smelly Hippies] + * [http://www.theaggie.org/article/2732 Steal this Column: …And Filthy Rotten Liars (TGIF)]